AS the affairs of GOVERNMENT and LIBER­TY, are the greatest points of controversy, now in the world, it certainly is of great impor­tance, that our ideas be clear and just con­cerning them. Permit me therefore to offer a few thoughts, upon a familiar metaphor, which the holy Ghost has used to illustrate their true nature. In Amos, v. 24. he says, ‘Let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.’ From whence we may observe,

First. That judgment and righteousness are essential to free­dom. When we would represent any thing as quite free, we say, it is as free as water. And not only the flow of mercy and grace from God to men, but also its effects in them, in producing obedience unto him, are often compared thereto in the word of truth—John, IV. 14. and VII. 38. Titus, 2.11, 12. and 3, 5—8. This is most certain, because

Second. Freedom is not acting at random, but by reason and rule. Those who walk after their own lusts, are clouds without water, carried about of winds; or raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; while the true SONS OF LI­BERTY are like streams, which run down in a clear and steady channel. David says, I will run the way of thy commandments, when thou shalt enlarge my heart. I will walk at liberty, for I seek thy precepts. Streams and rivers must have steady chan­nels to run in; but they that promise liberty while they despise government, are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest. 11 Pet. 2.10—19.

Third. Though tyranny and licentiousness often make a great noise, yet government and liberty are much stronger than they are. The former, like raging waves, dash themselves against the rocks, and die upon the shore; or like a tempest, after making sad waste and devastation, their strength is gone, and their force is over. While the latter, like a mighty stream, carry all before them, and never rest till they can get through or over all obstacles, which are put in their way.

[Page 4] Fourth. Streams and rivers are of great use, and cause a con­stant flow of refreshment and blessings wherever they come; so does the exercise and administration of judgment and righ­teousness, among all people that enjoy them. Hence,

Fifth. The command of heaven is, Let them run down; put no obstruction in their way. No, rather be in earnest to re­move every thing that hinders their free course.

Sixth. The context plainly shews, that a main obstruction to these great blessings, among the people then spoken to, was their assuming a power to govern religion, instead of being go­verned by it. True religion is a voluntary obedience unto God. And the great design of all ordinances and acts of wor­ship towards him, is that thereby we may obtain pardon and cleansing, with direction and assistance to behave as we ought towards our fellow-men. But instead of this, those people added their own inventions to divine institutions, and substituted their acts of devotion towards God, in the place of a righteous practice towards men; or for a cover to their con­trary conduct: And they would fain have been thought very religious, although they turned judgment into wormwood, hated him that rebuked in the gate, and abhorred him that spoke upright­ly. These things were written for our admonition; and all things of that nature, if indulged, will prove as pernicious to us, as they did to the Jews. And since self-interest and self-flattery have an amazing influence to blind men, concerning their own conduct in these affairs, great care ought to be taken to guard against deception therein. And perhaps a close attention to two late publications, from the ruling party in this State, may be very serviceable in that respect.

Eleven years ago, the episcopal clergy appeared very earnest for having Bishops established in America; which caused Dr. Chauncy of Boston, to write an answer the next year, to what Dr. Chandler had published upon that subject. And as Chandler had declared, that all they wanted, was only to have their church compleatly organized, without the least design of injuring others, the best reason that Chauncy could give, why his request ought not to be granted, was this: Says he,

‘We are, in principle, against all civil establishments in re­ligion.—It does not appear to us, that God has entrusted the state with a right to make religious establishments. If the [Page 5] state in England has this delegated authority, must it not be owned, that the state in China, in Turkey, in Spain, has this authority likewise? What should make the difference in the eye of true reason? Hath the state of England been distin­guished by heaven by any peculiar grant, beyond the state in other countries? If it has let the grant be produced. If it has not, all states have, in common, the same authority in establish­ments conformable to their own sentiments in religion; what can the consequence be, but infinite damage to the cause of God and true religion! And such in fact has been the consequence of these establishments in all ages, and in all places. Should it be said, we claim liberty of conscience, and fully enjoy it; and why would we confine this privilege to our selves? Is it not as reasonable, episcopalians should both claim and enjoy it? It is readily allowed; and we are as willing they should possess and exercise religious liberty in its full extent, as we desire to do it ourselves. But then, let it be heedfully minded, we claim no right to desire the interposition of the state to esta­blish that mode of worship, government, or discipline, we apprehend is most agreeable to the mind of Christ. We de­desire no other liberty, than to be left unrestrained in the exercise of our principles, in so far as we are good members of society: And we are perfectly willing episcopalians should enjoy this liberty to the full. If they think Bishops, in their appropriated sense, were constituted by Christ or his apos­tles we object not a word against their having as many of them as they please, if they will be content to have them with au­thority altogether derived from Christ. But they both claim and desire a great deal more. They want to be distinguished by having bishops upon the footing of a state-establishment. The plain truth is, by the gospel-charter, all professed chris­tians are vested with precisely the same rights; nor has one denomination any more a right to the interposition of the civil magistrate, in their favour, than another; and where­ever this difference takes place, it is beside the rule of scrip­ture, and I may say also, the genuine dictates of uncorrupted reason.’ ^* From whence we may learn, that corrupt reason­ings, have carried Dr. Chauncy's denomination on in a way beside scripture rule, for these hundred and forty years; for just so long have their rulers interposed their authority, to support [Page 6] their religious ministers by assessment and distress, to the un­speakable damage of other denominations, and contrary to the practice of the first planters of the country, for eighteen years. And that partiality was wholly an arbitrary usurpation of the ruling party, without the least warrant for it, in either of our charters; yet the majority of the convention last winter, voted to incorporate those ecclesiastical laws with others, into the new constitution of government, which they were framing for us, which, if it had been received by the people, would have esta­blished them in another manner than ever they were before.— Upon hearing of which, the agent and committee of our Bap­tist churches met at Boston, Feb. 21, and drew up a protest, and petition to our next Assembly against it; wherein they shew, that those laws are contrary to christian liberty, exclude Christ from being the only lawgiver and head of his church, are a breach of public faith, as they tax people where they are not represented, and impower the majority to judge for the rest about spiritual guides, which naturally causes envying and strife, contrary to the wisdom that is from above, which is without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And they close with saying, ‘Our earnest prayer is, that your honors may be the happy instruments of promoting such impartial peace, as to fix it as a fundamental principle of our constitution, that religious ministers shall be supported only by Christ's authority, and not at all by assessment and secular force: which impartial liberty has long been claimed and enjoyed by the town of Boston.’

Great numbers, and of various denominations, subscribed this address to our Assembly; ^† which alarmed a number of ministers; and Mr. Phillips Payson, who preached the Election sermon, at Boston, May 27th, commended the constitution that was framed for us last winter, and says, "It may justly be considered as a high evidence of the abilities of its compilers, and if it should not be complied with, it is very probable we never shall obtain a better." And he said to the Assembly,

"The importance of religion to civil society and government, is great indeed, as it keeps alive the best sense of moral obliga­tion, a matter of such extensive utility, especially in respect to [Page 7] an oath, which is one of the principal instruments of govern­ment. The fear and reverence of God, and the terrors of eternity, are the most powerful restraints upon the minds of men. And hence it is of special importance in a free govern­ment, the spirit of which being always friendly to the sacred rights of conscience, it will hold up the gospel as the great rule of faith and practice. Established modes and usages in reli­gion, more especially the stated public worship of God, so ge­nerally form the principles and manners of a people, that changes, or alterations in these, especially, when nearly con­formed to the spirit and simplicity of the gospel, may well be esteemed very dangerous experiments in government. For this and other reasons, the thoughtful and wise among us, trust that our civil fathers, from a regard to gospel worship, and the constitution of these churches, will carefully preserve them; and at all times, guard against every innovation, that might tend to overset the public worship of God, though such inno­vations may be urged from the most foaming zeal. Persons of a gloomy, ghostly and mystic cast, absorbed in visionary scenes, deserve but little notice in matters, either of religion or government. Let the restraints of religion, once be broken down, as they infallibly would be, by leaving the subject of public worship to the humors of the multitude; and we might well defy all human wisdom and power, to support and pre­serve order and government in the State." ^*

Perhaps many may think, that the two authors I have quoted upon religious establishments, are of opposite sen­timents, if not of different denominations, in religion.— Could this thought be supported by evidence, it would readi­ly be admitted; rather than to suppose them guilty, of such self-contradiction, as they most certainly are. For facts abun­dantly shew, that Dr. Chauncy has exerted himself, from time to time, to defend the establishment we complain of, much more than Mr. Payson has done. And to defend it against the bishops, the first of these gentleman says, "It does not appear, to us, that God has entrusted the state with a right to make re­ligious establishments." The other warns our civil rulers, against suffering any changes in their "established modes and usages in religion." The first declares, that such establishments [...] fact, been of infinite damage to the cause of God and true [Page 8] religion, in all ages, and in all places. The other says, "The thoughtful and wise among us, trust that our civil fathers, from a regard to gospel worship, and the constitution of these churches, will carefully preserve them; and at all times, guard against every innovation, that might tend to overset the public worship of God."

The Jews at Thessalonica, when moved with envy, cried to their rulers, These that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also. But for a professed minister of Christ, to alarm our civil rulers of danger, that the worship of God would be overset, if they did not carefully preserve these churches, is much more surprizing! He says, "Persons of a gloomy, ghost­ly and mystic cast, absorbed in visionary scenes, deserve but little notice in matters, either of religion or government." And indeed I think so too; and to whom can these epithets belong so properly, as to those, who think that the church of Christ, and the worship of God, would be overset, if secular force was not used to support them? Are such churches built upon the ROCK, or upon the sand?

This gentleman says, "The language of just complaint, the voice of real grievance, in most cases, may easily be distinguish­ed from the meer clamor of selfish, turbulent and disappointed men. The ear of a righteous government will always be open to the former; its hand, with wisdom and prudence will sup­press the latter." ^*— This is an important truth. And since he warns our rulers against innovations, I think i my du­ty, plainly to mention some of them, which his party have been guilty of in our land. The learned tell us, that to innovate, is "to introduce, or practise new customs, opinions, or laws, af­ter a sly, clandestine manner. And let the public judge, whe­ther his party have not done so, in the following instances; al­though they have doubtless had many pious men among them.

The Massachusetts company came over to New-England, ten years after Plymouth people had begun the settlement thereof. ^† The charter, which constituted them a civil go­vernment, expressly limited them, not to make any laws con­trary to the laws of England; and all the freemen, who were [Page 9] admitted to vote for their rulers, took an oath of allegience to the government, wherein they solemnly engaged to submit to, "all such laws, orders, sentences and decrees, as should be lawfully made and published by them." ^* But when they set out to frame and enforce a new religious establishment, very contrary to that of England, they found that their oath stood in the way of it; therefore they passed an act, four years after they came to Boston, to absolve themselves, and all the freemen, from their oath to keep acts lawfully made, and framed an­other, of submission to all such laws as they called wholesome. Was not this an innovation of the worst kind?

The following year the court sent out to all their ministers and brethren, for advice and assistance, about one uniform order of discipline in their churches; ^† and at the same time passed an act, to compel every male within their jurisdiction, of six­teen years old and above, to take this new invented oath, or be punished at their discretion.

Mr. Roger Williams was then minister of Salem; and be­cause he publicly warned his flock against taking that oath, he was soon convented before the rulers at Boston: ^‡ But he boldly stood his ground, against them and their ministers too. The next time their assembly met, they took away a valuable tract of land from his church, till they should give the court satis­faction upon these matters. For this, Mr. Williams and his church, wrote letters of reproof to the churches where those rulers belonged; but instead of repenting of this iniquity, they banished him out of their colony. ^§ Whereupon he went and founded the first civil government, that ever established equal religious liberty, since the rise of Antichrist. And soon after gathered the first Baptist church in America. He also did the most to prevent the ruin of all these colonies by the Indians, of any one man in the country. Thus he overcame evil with good; while the advocates for the use of secular force in re­ligion, have requited him, and his friends, evil for good ever since.

And they were so far from promoting peace among themselves by these means, ^‖ that in less than a year after his banishment, [Page 10] the two ministers of Boston, and the two chief rulers of the colony, who belonged to that church, got to open clashings in their meeting-house, on the Lords-day, and the flame spread through the land. ^* This moved them to call a general synod upon it. And because a new house of representatives refused to join in punishing such as the synod had condemned, it was immediately dissolved, and another house called; and then several were banished, and seventy-six men were disarmed, of whom fifty-eight were of Boston. ^† The year after they made their first law to support ministers by assessment and distress; which was followed with finings, imprisonings, whippings and hangings; and with the exertion of all their art and power, for forty years after, in various attemps to divide and conquer Rhode-Island colony. And all the disorders, which these and other means could produce therein, have been used ever since, as a most prevailing argument for an established religion by human laws.

And those violations of the rights of conscience, furnished the British court with the most plausable plea they ever had, ^‡ for taking away our first charter; and in the second, for de­priving us of the inestimable priviledge of chusing our chief rulers; ^§ which was evidently the root of all the gall and wormwood, blood and slaughter, which we now deplore. For the crown being vested with an arbitrary power of appointing our chief officers, the arbitrary requirement of our property to support them, was the natural consequence. And it is well known that contests about that matter kindled this bloody war. So that the scheme of religious establishments by human laws, is stained with the guilt of all this blood.

In my late history of New-England, a great number of proofs are produced to the above facts, and our opponents are welcome to discover any mistakes therein, if they can. And I shall now close, with earnestly requesting the attention of my dear countrymen to two points.

1. Consider what our civil liberties will be, if these men can have their wills. I need not inform you that all America are in arms against being taxed where they are not represented: [Page 11] But it is not more certain, that we are not represented in the British parliament, than it is, that our civil rulers are not our representatives in religious affairs: Yet ministers have long prevailed with them, to impose religious taxes, intirely out of their jurisdiction. And they have now been defied to preserve order in the state, if they should drop that practice. "That magistrates should thus suffer these incendiaries, and disturbers of the public peace, might justly be wondered at (says the great Mr. Locke) if it did not appear, that they have been invited by them unto a participation of the spoil, and have therefore thought fit to make use of their coveteousness and pride, as a means whereby to increase their own power." ^*

2. How can liberty of conscience be rightly enjoyed, till this iniquity is removed? The word of truth says, why is my liberty judged of another man's conscience? Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. But Mr. Payson says, "Let the restraints of religion once be broken down, as they INFAL­LIBLY would be, by leaving the subject of public worship to the humours of the multitude, and we might well defy all hu­man wisdom and power to support and preserve order in the state." He tells of humours, but it is well known that no men are influenced more by distempered humours, than those who are fond of arbitrary power. And if he had not been deeply absorbed thereby in visionary scenes, how could he possibly have delivered this sentence as he did, directly in the face of glaring facts which then surrounded him, as well as against divine truth! By an express law of this government, the multitude of people in Boston, have been left intirely free, these eighty-five years, to choose what worship they would at­tend upon, and not to be compelled to pay a farthing to sup­port any that they did not chuse: And there are proofs enough to shew, that this liberty has greatly contributed to the welfare and not the injury of the town. And his great swelling word, INFALLIBLY, is as contrary to the holy scriptures, as it is to experienced facts. That word says, in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing, if we shall reap your carnal things? The Lord hath ordained, that they who preach the gospel, should live of the gospel. Let him that is taught in the word, communicate unto him that teacheth [Page 12] in all good things. Be not deceived, God is not mocked. And Christ solemnly forbids the giving of any countenance or sup­port to teachers who bring not HIS DOCTRINE; of which each rational soul has an equal right to judge for himself.— Mat. xv.—Rom. xiv. 4.5.—1 Cor. ix. 1.14. and x. 15.29.— Gal. i. 8.9. and vi. 6.7.—2 John, x. 11. But the command­ments of men among us, while they have allowed this liberty to Boston, have expressly denied the same to the country; where they have ordained, that they who preach the gospel, shall live of human laws; which laws are so opposite to these laws of Christ, that they empower the majority in each town or parish to judge for the rest; even so, that if the minority were ever so fully persuaded, that the parish minister perverted the gospel, instead of teaching it truly, yet the majority might seize the goods, or imprison the persons, of the minority, to support that blind guide! And the chief judge of each of our county courts have been required, from year to year, to charge the grand jury upon their oaths, to prosecute every parish in the county, that did not settle such a minister as the court called orthodox. Though, at the same time, if any church, together with the town or parish, was ever so unanimous in the choice of a gospel minister, yet there is an express law of this govern­ment that excludes him from being settled in their constitution, until he has an accademical degree, or an approbation from the majority of the settled ministers in that county.

And this constitution has been so far from promoting our public welfare, that if the whole town of Chelsea, where Mr. Payson lives, was publicly sold for the most it would fetch, it would go but a little way towards paying the costs this govern­ment have been put to, only for the sitting of their legislature to form religious societies, and to hear and act upon quarrels and disputes of that nature, which they have no right to medle with. And how can justice and righteousness ever have their free course among us, while men thus assume power to govern religion, instead of being governed by it?

I am as sensible of the importance of religion, and of the utility of it to human society, as Mr. Payson is. And I con­cur with him, that the fear and reverence of God, and the ter­rors of eternity, are the most powerful restraints upon the minds of men. But I am so far from thinking, with him, that these restraints would be broken down, if equal religious liberty [Page 13] was established, that I am very certain we should heretofore have suffered much more than we have done, if the restraints of religion had not often constrained his party to act contrary to their ecclesiastical laws, or to suspend the execution of them. They often declare, that they allow us liberty of conscience, and also complain of injury, if we recite former and latter acts of their party to prove the contrary. Just so has Dr. Chandler done with regard to bishops; and he declares they had now no design of taxing America to them; yet he says, "Should a general tax be laid upon the country, and thereby a sum be raised sufficient for the purpose, I believe such a tax would not amount to more than four pence in one hundred pounds; and this would be no mighty hardship upon the country. He that could think much of giving the six thou­sandth part of his income to any use which the legislature of his country should assign, deserves not to be considered in the light of a good subject, or member of society." ^* Put in an­swer hereto, Dr. Chauncey says "If the country might be taxed four pence in one hundred pounds, it might for the same reason, and with as much justice, if it was thought the support of bishops called for it, be taxed four shillings, or four pounds, and so on." All but tories will allow this to be good reason­ing; and why is it not as good in a baptist as in a presbyterian? He goes back 150 years, and tells of the EPISCOPAL YOKE OF BONDAGE, which our forefathers came into this wilder­ness to avoid, and says, "Shall it be declared in the face of the world, that this would be no hardship to their posterity, and that they would be neither good subjects, nor good mem­bers of society, if they thought much of supporting that POWER which has been, and may again be TERRIBLY OPPRESSIVE!" ^† True, Doctor: There lies the difficulty. It is not the PENCE, but the POWER, that alarms us. And since the legislature of this State passed an act, no longer ago than last September, to continue a tax of FOUR PENCE a year, upon the baptists in every parish where they live, as an anknowledgement of the POWER that they have long assumed over us in religious affairs, which we know has often been TERRIBLY OPPRESSIVE, how can we be blamed for refusing to pay that acknowledgement; especially when it is considered, that it is evident to us, that God never allowed any civil State upon earth, to impose reli­gious [Page 14] taxes; but that he declared his vengeance against those in Israel, who presumed to use force in such affairs. — 1 Sam. ii. 16.34. —Micah. iii. 5.12.

Rulers, ministers and people, ought to improve all their in­fluence, in their several stations, to promote and support true religion by gospel means and methods; but as the teaching the fear of God by the precepts of men, brought confusion and ruin upon the Jewish nation—Isaiah. xxix 13 21 — it surely is of infinite importance, that every lover of our dear country, be in earnest to have it saved from such iniquity, and from such ruin.