THE First Case that I am desired to express my Judgment in, is this, Whether it is not Possible for the De­vil to impose on the Imaginations of Persons Bewitched, and to cause them to Believe that an Innocent, yea that a Pious person do's torment them, when the Devil himself doth it, or whether Satan may not appear in the Shape of an Innocent and Pious, as well as of a Nocent and Wicked Person to Afflict such as suffer by Diabolical Molestations?

The Answer to the Question must be Affir­mative; Let the following Arguments be duely weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary.

[Page 2] Argu. 1. There are several Scriptures from which we may infer the Possibility of what is Affirmed.

1. We find that the Devil by the Instigation of the Witch at Endor appeared in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel. I am not Ignorant that some have asserted that, which, if it were proved would e­vert this Argument, Viz. that it was the true and not a delusive Samuel which the Witch brought to converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are some of the Jewish Rabbies ^(a) and some Christian Doctors ^(b) and many late Popish Authors ^(c) amongst whom Cornel. ^(d) Lapide is most elaborate. But that it was a Daemon representing Samuel has bin evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers: especially ^(e) Peter Martyr, ^(f) Balduin [...]s ^† Lavater, and our Incomparable John Rainolde. I shall not here insist on the clearing of that, especi­ally considering, that elsewhere I have done it: only let me add that the Witch said to Saul, I see E [...]him, i. e. A God; (for the whole Context shows, that a single Person is intended) Ascending out of the Earth. 1 Sam. 28. 13. The Devil would be Worshipped as a God, and Saul now, that he was become a Necromancer, must bow himself to him. Moreover, had it bin the true Samuel from [Page 3] Heaven reprehending Saul, there is great Reason to believe that he would not. only have reproved him for his sin, in not executing Judgment on the Amalekites; as in Ver. 18. But for his wickedness in consulting with Familiar Spi [...]its: for which Sin it was in special that he Dy [...]d. 2. Chr [...]n. 10. 13. But in as much as there is not one word to Testi [...]y against that Abomination, we may conclude that it was not Real Samuel that appeared to S [...]ul. And if it were the Devil in his likeness the Argument seems very strong, that if the Devil, may appear in the Form of a Saint in Glory, much more is it pos­sible for him, to put on the Likeness, of the most Pious and innocent Saint on Earth. There are, who acknowledge that a Daemon may appear in the Shape of a Godly Person, But not as doing Evil. Whereas the Devil in Samuels likeness told a Per­nici [...]s Lye, when he said Thou hast Disquieted me. It was not in the Power of Saul, nor of all the De­vils in Hell, to di [...]quiet a Soul in Heaven, where Sa­muel had been for Two years before this Appariti­on. Nor did the Spectre speak true, when he said, Thou and thy Sons shall be with me; tho' Saul himself at his Death went to be with the Devil, his Son Jo­nathan did not so. Besides, (which suits with the matter in hand) the Devil in Samuels shape confir­med Necromancy and cursed Witchery. He that can in the likeness of Saints encourage Witches to Familiarity with Hell, may possibly in the Likene [...] ofa Saint afflict a Bewitched Person. But this we see from Scripture, Satan may be Permitted to do.

[Page 4]And whereas it is objected, that the Devil may appear indeed in the Form of Dead Persons, but that he cannot represent such as are living; The Cont [...] is manifest. No Question had Saul said to the Witch, bring me David who was then living, she could as easily have shown living David as dead Samuel, as easily as that great Conjurer, of whom ^† Wierus speaks, brought the appearance of Hector and Achilles and after that of David before the Emperour Maximilian.

And that evil Angels have sometimes appeared in the likeness of living absent persons is a thing abun­dantly confirmed by History.

^(I) Austin tells us of one that went for Reso­lution in some intricate Questions, to a Philosopher of whom he could get no Answer; but in the night the Philosopher comes to him, and, resolve, all his Doubts. Not long after, he demanded the Reason why he could not answer him in the day as well as in the night; The Philosopher professed he was not with him in the night, only acknow­ledged that he dreamed of his having such Con­versation with his Friend, but he was all the time at home, and asleep. Pau [...]s and Palladius did both of them profess to Austin, that one in his Shape, had divers times, and in divers places appeared to them ^(k) Thyreus: mentions several Apparitions of, absent living persons, which happened in his time. [Page 5] which he had the certain knowledg of A Man that is in one place cannot (Aut [...]pro [...]opos) at the same time be in another. It remains then that such spectres are Prodigious & Supernatural, & not with­out Diabolical Operation. It has been Controver­ted among Learned men, whether innocent persons may not by the malice and deluding Power of the Devil be represented as present amongst witches at their dark Assemblies. The mentioned Thyreus sayes that the Devil may and often does represent the Forms of innocent persons out of those Con­ventions, and that there is no Question to be made of it, but as to his natural Power and Art he is able to make their shapes appear amongst his own ser [...]ants, but he suppo [...]eth the Providence of God will not suffer such an Injury to be done to an Innocent Person. With him ^(m) Delrio, and Spineus concur. But Cumanus in his Lucerna Inquisit [...]rum (a Book which I have not yet seen) defends the Affirma­tive in this Question. Bins fieldius in his Treatise, concerning the Confession of Witches, inclines to the negative, only ^(o) he acknowledges Dei extraordinaria Permissione Posse Innocentes sic representari. And he that shall assert, that the great and Holy God ne­ver did nor ever will permit the Devil thus far to abuse an Innocent Person, affirms more than he is able to prove. The story of Germanus his discover­ing a Diabolical illusion of this nature concerning a great Number of Persons that seemed to be at a feast [Page 6] when they were really at home and asleep, is men­tioned by many Authors. But the Particulars in­sisted on, do sufficiently evince the truth of what we assert, viz. that the Devil may by Divne Permission appear in the shape of Innocent and Pious Persons. Neverthelesse, it is evident from another Scripture, viz. that in, 2 Cor 11. 1 [...]. For Satan himself is trans­formed into an Angel of Light. He seems to be what he is not, and makes others seem to be what they are not. He represents evil men as good, & good men as evil. The Angels of Heaven (who are the Angels of Light) love truth and Righteousness, the Devil will seem to do so to. And does therefore sometimes lay before men excellent good principles and exhort them (as he did Theodore maill [...]t) to practise many things, which by the Law of Righte­ousness they are obliged unto, and hereby he does more effectually deceive. Is it not strange, that he has sometimes intimated to his most devoted ser­vants, that if they would have familiar Conversa­tion with him, they must be careful to keep them­selves from enormous Sins, and pray constantly for Divine Protection? But so has he transfarmed him­self into an Angel of Light, as ^(p) Boissardus shew­eth. He has frequently appeared to men pretend­ing to be a good Angel, so to Anatolius of old; and the late instances of ^(q) Dr Dee & Kellet are famously known. How many deluded Enthusiasts both in former and latter times have bin imposed on by [Page 7] Satans appeaing visibly to them, pretending to be a good Angel. And moreover, he may be said to transform himself into an Angel of Light because of his appearing in the Form of Holy Men who are the Children of Light, yea in the Shape and Habit of Eminent Ministers of God. So did he appear to Mr Earl of Colchester in the Likeness of Mr Liddal an Holy man of God and to the Turkish Chaous Baptized at London Anno 1658 pretending to be Mr D [...]ry an excellent Minister of Christ. And how of­ten has he pretended to be the Apostle Paul Or Peter or some other celebrated Saint? Ecclesiastical His­tories abound with Instances of this nature. Yea, sometimes he has transfigured himself into the Form of Christ. It is reported that he appeared to ^(r) St Martin Gloriously arrayed as if he had been Christ. So likewise to ^(s) Second [...], and to another Saint, who suspecting it was Satan, transforming himself into an Angel of Light had this expression, If I may see Christ in Heaven it is enough, I desire not to see him in this world, whereupon the spec [...]re vanished. It has been related of Luther, [...]hat after he had been Fasting and Praying in his Study, the Devil comes pretending to be Christ, but Luther saying, away thou confounded Devil, I acknowledg no Christ but what is in my Bible, nothing more was seen. Thus then the Devil is able (by Divine Permission) to Change himself into what Form or Figure he pl [...]aseth,

[Page 8] Omnia transformat sese in miracula rerum.

A Third Scripture to our purpose is that, in Re [...] 12 10 where the Devil is called the Accuser of the Brethren Such is the malice and Impudence of the Devil, as that he does accuse good men and that before God, and that not only of such Faults as they really are guilty of, he accused Joshua with his filthy garments, when thro' his Indulgence some of his Family had transgressed by unlawful marriages. Zac: 3. 23. with Ezra: 10. 18. but also with such Crimes, as they are altogether free from. He represented the Pri­mitive Christians as the vilest of men, and as if at their meetings they did commit the most nefandous Villani [...]s that ever were known. And that not only innocent but eminently Pious persons should thro' the malice of the Devil be accused with the Crime of witchcraft is no new thing. Such an af­f [...]iction did the Lord see meet to exercise the great Athanasius with ^(t) only the Divine Providene did wonderfully vindicate him from that as well as from some other soul Aspersions. The Waldenses (altho the scriptures call them Saints, Rev: 13. 7.) have been traduced by Satan and by the world as Horri­ble witches. So have others in other places, only because they have done extraordinary things by their prayers. It is by many Authors related that a City in France was molested with a Diabolical Spectre, which the People were wont to call Hugon. [Page 9] Near that place a number of Protestants were wont to meet to serve God. Whence the Professors of the true Reformed Religion were nick-named Hugo­nots by the Papists, who designed to render them before the world as the servants and worshippers of that Demon, that went under the name of Hugon. And how often have I read in Books written by Jesuits, that Luther was a Wizza [...]d, & that he did himself confess that he had Familiarity with Satan! Most impudent Untruths! nor are these things to be wondered at, since the Holy Son of God himself was reputed a Magician, and one that had Familiari­ty with the greatest of Devils. The Blaspheming Pharisees said, He casts out the Devils thro' the Prince of Devils. Math. 9. 34. There is then not the best Saint on Earth (Man or Woman) that can assure themselves that the Devil shall not cast such an Imputation upon them. It is enough for the Dis­ciple that he be as his Master, and the Servant as his Lord: If they have called the Master of the House Beelzebub, how much more them of His Houshold. Math. 10. 25. It is not for men to determine how far the Holy God may permit the wicked one to pro­ceed in his Accusations. The sacred story of Job. giveth us to understand that the Lord whose wayes are past finding out, do's for Wise and Holy Ends suffer Satan, by immediate Operation, (and con­sequently by Witchcraft) greatly to afflict innocent persons, as in their Bodies and Estates, so in their Reputations. I shall mention but one Scripture more to confirm the Truth in hand. It is that in, [Page 10] Eccles. 9. 2, 3. Where it is said, All things come a­like to all, there is one event to the Righteous and to the Wicked, as is the Good, so is the sin­ner, this is an evil amongst all things under the Sun that there is one Event happenet [...] to all. And in Eccles. 7. 15. tis said, There is a just man that perisheth in his Righteousness.

From hence we inferr that there is no outward Affliction whatsoever but may befal a Good Man; now to be represented by Satan as a Tormentor of Bewitched or Possessed Persons, is a sore affliction to a Good man. To be Tormented by Satan is a sore Affliction, yet nothing but what befel Job, and a Daughter of Abraham whom we read of in the Gospel. To be represented by Satan, as tormenting others, is an affliction like the former. The Lord may bring such extraordinary Temptations on his own Children, to Afflict and Humble them, for some sin they have been guilty of before him. A most wicked Person in St. Ives, got a Knife, and went with it to a Ministers House; designing to stab him, but was disappointed. Afterwards Con­science being awakened, the Devil appears to this Person in the Shape of that Minister, with a Knife in his hand exhorting to Self-murder. Was not here a punishment suitable to the sin which that Person had been Guilty of? Perhaps some of those, whom Satan has represented as committing Witchcrafts, have been tampering with some foolish and Wick­ed Sorceries, tho' not to that degree, which is Cri­minal and Capital by the Laws both of God, and [Page 11] Men; for this Satan may be permitted so to scourge them. Or, it may be they have misrepresented & abused others, for which cause the Holy God may justly give Satan leave, fal [...]ely to represent them.

Have we not known some that have bitterly cen­sured all that have bin complained of by bewi [...]ched Persons, saying it was impossible they should not be Guilty, soon upon which themselves or some near Relations of theirs, have to the lasting Infamy of their Families been accused after the same Manner, and personated by t [...]e Devil? Such▪ tremendous r [...] ­ [...]ukes on a few, should make all men to be careful how they joyn with Satan in Condemning the In­nocent.

Arg: 2. Because it is possible for the Devil in the Shape of an innocent person to do other mischiefs. As for those who acknowledge that Satan may perso­nate a Pious Person, but not to do mischief, their opinion has been conf [...]ted by more than a few unhappy instances. Mr Clark ^(u) speaks of a man that had been an Atheist, or a Sadduce, not b [...]li [...] ­ving that there are any Devils or any (to us) in­vi [...]ible world, This man was converted, but as a Punishment of his In [...]idelity, evil Angels did often appear to him in the Shape of his most intimate Friends, and would sometimes seduce him into great inconveniences. It has bin else where and but now noted that a Doemon in the Shape of excel­lent Mr. Dury appeared to the Turkish Chaous Ann. [Page 12] 1658 to di [...]wade him from prosecuting his de­sires of Baptism into the name of Christ; Also to Mr. Earle in the likeness of his Friends, to dis­courage him from doing things lawful and good. A multitude of Jews were once deluded by a person pretending to be Moses from Heaven, and that if they would follow him they should pass safe through the Sea (as did their Fathers of old thro' the red sea) whereby great numbers of them were deceived and perished in the waters. ^(w) Learned and Judicious men have concluded that this Moses Cree [...]sis, was a Demon, transforming himself into Moses. And that the Devil has frequently appeared ^(x) in the shape of famous Persons to the end that he might seduce men into Idolatry a sin equal to to that of witchcraft) no man that has made it his concern to enquire into things of this nature can be ignorant. Many Examples of this kind are collect­ed by Mr. Bromhall in his Treatise of Spectres, and the cunning Devil, to strengthen men in their worshipping of Saints departed: And by Mr Bovet in his Pande­monium. It is credibly reported that the Devil in the likeness of a faithful Minister (at St Ives before mentioned near Boston in Lincolnshire) came to one that was in trouble of mind, telling her the longer she lived, the worse It would be for her, & therefore advising her to self-murder. An eminent Person still living had the account of this matter from Mr. Cotton (the famous Teacher of both Bostons). He [Page 13] was well acquainted with that Minister, who rela­ted to him the whole Story with all the Circum­stances of it. For Mr. Cotton was so affected with the Report, as to take a Journey on purpose to the Town where this happened, that so he might obtain a satisfactory Account about it, which he did. Some Authors say that a Demon appeared in the Form of Sylvanus ( Hiero [...]'s Friend) attempting a dishonest thing, the Devil thereby designing to blast the Re­putation of a famous Bishop. I have in another Book mentioned that celebrated Instance concern­ing an honest Citizen in Zurick (the Metropolis of Heluetia) in whose Shape the Devil appeared com­mitting an abominable Fact (not fit to be named) very early in the morning, seen by the Prefect of the City, and his Servant. They were amazed to Behold a man of good Esteem for his conversation, perpetrating a thing so vile and abominable: but go­ing from the Spectre in the Field, to the Citizens House in the Town, they found him at home, & in his bed, nor had he been abroad that morning, which convinced them that what they saw was an Illusion of the Devil. This Passage is mentioned as a thing known and certain by Lavater in his Trea­tise of Spectres, ^(z) who was a most learned and judicious Preacher in that City. Our Juel faith of him that he must ingeniously confess, that he never understood Solomons Proverbes, until Lavater ex­pounded them to him. That Book of his De Spec [...]ris [Page 14] hath been published in Latin, high and low Dutch French, Italan. The Leaned Zanchy ^† speaks highly of it, professing that he had read it both with Pleasure and Profit. Voetius ^(a) takes notice of that Passage which we have quoted out of Levater as a thing Memorable.

Some Popish Authors argue, that that Devil can­not personate an innocent man as doing an Act of witchcraft, because then he might as well represent them as commiting Theft, murder &c. And if so, there would be no Living in the world. But I turn the Argument against them, He may (as the mentioned Instances prove) personate honest men as doing other Evils. And no solid Reason can be given why he may not as well personate them un­der the notion of witches as under the notion of Thieves, Murders and Idolators. As for the Objecti­on, that then there would be no living in the world, we shall consider it under the next Argument.

Arg: 3. If Satan may not represent one that is not a covenant servant of his as afflicting those that are bewitched or possessed, then it is either because he wants Will, or Power to do this, or because God will never per­mit him thus to do. No man but a Saddu [...] doubts of the ill will of Devils. Nothing is more pleasing to the Malice of those wicked Spirits than to see Innocency wronged. And the Power of the Ene­my is such as that having once obtained a Divine Concession to use his Art, he can do this and much [Page 15] more then this amounts unto. We know by Scrip­ture-Revelation that the Sorcerers of AEgypt caused many untrue and delusive ^(†) Representations before Pharaoh and his Servants. Exod. 7. 11, 22 & 8. 7. And we read of the working of Satan in all Power and Signs, and lying wonders. 2. Thes. 2. 9. His [...]art is beyond what the wisest of men may pretend unto. He has perfect skill in Opticks, and can therefore cause that to be visible to one, which is not so to another; and things also to appear far otherwise then they are. He has likewise the Art of Limning in the Perfection of it, and knows what may be done by Colours. It is an odd Pas­sage ^(b) which I find in the Acta Eruditorum Printed at Lip [...]ick, that about 32 years ago an indigent Mer­chant in France was instructed by a Doemon that with water of Borax he might colour Taffities, so as to cause them to glister and look very gay. He fearcheth into the Nature, Causes, and Reasons of things, whereby he is able to produce wonderful ef­fects. So that if he does not form the Shape of an innocent person as afflicting others, it is not from want of either will or power. They that affirm that God never did nor ever will permit him thus to do, alledge that it is incon [...]stant with the Righte­ousness and Providence of God in Governing Hu­mane Affairs thus to suffer men to be imposed on. It must be acknowledged ^(c) that the Divine Pro­vidence [Page 16] has taken care that the greatest part of man­kind shall not be left to unavoidable Deception, so as to be always abused by the mischievous Agents of Hell, in the objects of plain [...]ence. But yet it is not for sinful and silly Mortals to prescribe Rules to the Most High in his Government of the world, or to direct him how far he may permit Satan to use his power: I am apt to think that there are some amongst us, who if they had lived in Job's days, and seen the Devil tormenting of him, and heard him complaining of being fear'd with Dreams and terrified with Night-visions, they would have joined with his uncharitable friends in Censuring him as a most guilty person. But we should consi­der that the Most High God do [...]h sometimes deal with men in a way of Absolute Soveraignty, per­forming the thing which is appointed for them, and many such things are with him. If he does destroy the perfect with the wicked, and Laugh at the Trial of the innocent (Job 9. 22, 23.) who shall enter into His Counsels! who has given Him a Charge over the Earth. or who has disposed the whole world! men are not able to give an Account of his ordinary works much less of his secret Coun­sels, and the Dark Dispensations of his Providence. They do but darken counsel by words without knowledge when they undertake it. If we are not able to see how this or that can stand with the Righteousness of him that Governs the world, shall wo say that the Almighty will pervert Judgment? or that he that Governs the Earth hateth Right? [Page 17] shall we condemn him that is most just? But where­as 'tis objected where is Providence? and how shall men live on the Earth, If the Devil may be per­mitted to use such power? I demand, where was Providence, when Satan had Power to cause sons of Belial to lye and swear away the life of innocent Nab [...]th, laying such Crimes to his charge as he was never guilty of? And what an hour of Darkness was it? How far was the power of Hell permitted to prevail, when Christ the Son of God was Accu­sed▪ Condemned, and Hanged for a Crime that he never was guilty of? That was the strangest Provi▪dence that has happened since the world began, and yet in the Issue the most glorious. We must therefore distinguish between what does ordinarily come to pass by the Providence of God, and things which are extraordinary. It is not an usual thing for a Naboth to have his life taken from him by false Accusations, or for an Athanasi [...]s or a Susann [...] to be Charged, and perhaps brought before Courts of Judicature for Crimes of which they were alto­gether Innocent.

But if we therefore conclude that such a thing as this can never happen in the World, we shall of­fend against the Generation of the just. It i [...] not ordinary for Devils to be permitted to reveal the [...]—sins of men; yet this ha [...] been done more than once or twice. Nor is it ordinary for Daemo [...]s to Steal Money out of M [...]ns Pockets, and Purses, or Wine and Cyder out of their Cellars. Yet some such Instanc [...]s have there been amongst our­selv [...]s. [Page 18] It is not usual for Providence to permit the Devil to come from Hell and to throw Fire on the Tops of Houses, and to cause a whole Town to be burnt to Ashes thereby. There would (it must be confessed) be no living in the world if Evil-An­gels should be permitted to do thus when they had a mind to it. Neverthless, Authors worthy of Cre­dit, tell us that this has sometimes happened. ^(d) Both Erasmus and Ca [...]us write that the Town of Schiltach in Germany, was in the Month of April, 1533. Set on Fire by a Devil and Burnt to the Ground, in an Hou [...]s space. Tis also reported by Sigibert, Aventinus and others, that some Cottages and Barns in a Town called Bingus were Fired by a wicked Genius. That spiteful Daemon said it was for the Impieties of such a Man whom he named, that he was sent to molest them. The poor Man to satisfy his Neighbours, who were ready to Stone him, carried an hot Iron in his hand, but receiving no hurt thereby, he was judged to be innocent. It is not ordinary for a Devil upon the Dying Curse of a Servant, to have a Commission from Heaven to tear and torment a bloody cruel master; yet such a thing may possibly come to pass. There is a fearful Story to this purpose in the Account of the Bucaneers of America, ^(e) wherein my Author relates that a Servant, who was Spirited or Kidnapt (as they call it) Into America, falling into the Hands of a Tyrannical Master, he ran away from [Page 19] him, but being taken and brought back, the hard­hearted Tyrant Lashed him on his Naked Back, un­til his Body ran in an entire Stream of Blood. To make the Torment of this Miserable Creature In­tolerable, he Ano [...]nted his Wounds with Juyce of Lemmon mingled with Salt, and Pepper, being ground sma [...]l together, with which Torture the Miserable Wretch gave up the Ghost, with these Dying words, I beseeth the Almighty God, Creator of Heaven and Earth, that HE permit a Wicked Spirit, to make thee feel as many Torments before thy Death, as thou hast caused me to feel before mine. Scarce four dayes were past after this Horrible Fact, when the Almighty Judge, gave Permission to the father of Wickedness to Possess the Body of that cruel Ma­ster, and to make him Lacerate his own flesh, until he dyed, belike surrendering his Ghost into the hands of the Infernal Spirit, who had Tormented his Body. But of this Tragical Story enough.

To proceed, Is it not usual for Persons after their Death to appear unto the Living. But it do's not therefore follow, that the Great God will not suffer this to be. For both in former and latter A­ges, Examples thereof have not been wanting. No longer since, than the last Winter, there was much Discourse in London concerning a Gentlewoman, unto whom her Dead Son (and another whom she knew not) had appeared. Being then in Lon­don, I was willing to satisfy my self, by enquiring into the Truth of what was reported. And on Feb. 23. 1691. my Brother (who is now a Pastor [Page 20] to a Congregation in that City) and I Discoursed the Gentlewoman spoken of. She told us, that a Son of hers, who had been a very civil young man, but more airy in his Temper than was plea­sing to his serious Mother, being Dead, she was much concerned in her Thoughts about his Con­dition in the other World. But a Fortnight after his Death, he Appeared to her, saying, Mother, you are solicitous about my eternal Welfare. Trouble your self no more, for I am happy, and so vanished. Should there be a continual Intercourse between the Visible and the Invisible World, it would breed Confusion. But from thence to inferr, that the Great Ruler of the Universe will never permit any thing of this nature to be, is an inconsequent Conclusion. It is not usual for Devils to be per­mitted to come and violently carry away persons through the Air, several Miles from their Habitati­ons. Nevertheless, this was done in Sweedland a­bout Twenty Years ago, by means of a cursed Knot of Witches there. And a Learned Physici­an now living, giveth an Account of several Chil­dren, who by Diabolical Frauds were Stollen from their Parents, and others left in their room: And of two, that in the night-time a Line was by In­vi [...]b [...] Hands put about their necks, with which they had been Strangled, but that some near them happily prevented it. V. Germ. Ephem. Ann [...] 1689. pag. 51. 516.

Let me further add here; It has very seldome been known that Satan has personated Innocent [Page 21] Men doing an ill thing, but Providence has found out some way for their vindication; Either they have been able to prove that they were in another Place when that Fact was done, or the like. So that perhaps there never was an Instance of any Innocent Person Condemned in any Court of Judicature on Earth, only through Satans deluding and imposing on the Imaginations of men, when nevertheless, the Witnesses, Juries, and Judges were all to be excused from blame.

Arg: 4. It is certain both from Scripture and History that Magicians by their Inchantments and Hellish Con­juriati [...]s may cause a false Representation of persons, & things. An inchanted eye shall see such things as others cannot descern. It is a thing too well known to be denied that some by rubbing there eyes with a Bewitched water have immediately thereupon seen that which others could not discern. And there are persons in the World, who have a strange spec­tral sight. Mr Glanvil ^(f) speaks of a Dutch-man that could see Ghosts which others could perceive no­thing of. There are in Spain a sort of men whom they call Zahurs; these can see into the Bowels of the Earth. They are able to discover Minerals & hidden Treasures. nevertheless, they have their extraordi­nary sight only on Tuesdays and fridays; and not on the other dayes of the week. ^(f) Delrio faith that when he was at Madrid Ano.Domin. 1575. He saw some of these strange sighted Creatures. Mr. [Page 22] George Sinclare, in his Book enti [...]uled Satans Invisi­ble World discovered ^(h) has these words, ‘I am undoubtedly informed that men and women in the High-lands can discern Fatality approaching others by seeing them in the waters or with winding Sheets about them. And that others can lecture in a Sheeps shoulder-bone a death within the Parish seven or eight dayes before it come. It is not improbable but that such Preternatural Knowledge comes first by a Compact with the Devil and is derived down-ward by Succession to their Posterity. Many such I suppose are Innocent, and have this sight against their will and Inclination.’ Thus Mr. Sinclare. I concur with his supposal that such Knowledge is Originally from Satan, and perhaps the Effect of some old Inchantment. There are some at this day in the World, that if they come into an House where one of the Family will dye within a Fortnight, the smell of a Dead Corpse offends them to such a de­gree as that they cannot stay in that House. It is reported, that near unto the Abby of St. Mau­rice in Burgundy ⁽ⁱ⁾ there is a Fish-pond in which are Fishes put according to the number of the Monks of that place. If any one of them happen to be sick there is a Fish seen to Float and Swim above water half dead, and if the Monk shall dye, the Fish a few dayes before dieth. In some parts in Wales Death lights or Corps Candles (as they call [Page 23] them) are seen in the night time going from the House where some body will shortly dye, and passing into the Church-yard. Of this, my dearly Honoured and never to be forgotten Friend Mr. Richard Baxter ^(k) has given an Account in his Book about Witchcrafts lately Published. What to make of such things, except they be the Effects of some old Inchantment I know not. Nor what Natural Reason to Assign for that which I find a­mongst the Observations of the Imperial Academy for the Year 1687 viz. That in an Orchard, where are choice Damascen Plumbs, the Master of the Family being Sick of a Quartan Ague, whilst he continued very ill, four of his Plumb-trees instead of Damascens brought forth a vile sort of yellow Plumbs: but Recovering Health, the next Year the Tree did (as formerly) bear Dama [...]cens a­gain. But when after that he fell into a fatal Drop­sy, on those Trees were seen not Damascens, but another sort of Fruit. The same Author. ^(l) gives Instances of which he had the certain know­ledge concerning Apple-trees, and Pear-trees, that the Fruit of them would on a sudden wither as if they had been baked in an Oven, when the Own­ers of them were mortally sick. It is no less strange that in the Illustrious Electoral ^(m) House of Brandenbarg before the Death of some one of the Family, Feminine Sp [...]ctres appeared. ⁽ⁿ⁾ And often in the Houses of Great Men, Voices and [Page 24] Visions from the Invisible World have been the Ha [...]bingers of Death, When any Heir in the Wo [...]hipful Family of the Br [...]ertons in Chesh [...]e is near his Death, ther [...] are seen in a Pool adjoyning, Bodies of Trees swimming [...]or certain days toge­ther. On which Learned C [...]mbden ^(o) has this note. These and such like things are done eithe [...] by the Holy Tutclar Ang [...]ls of men, [...]r else by the Devils, who by Gods Permission might [...]ly shew their Power in this Inferiour World. As for Mr. [...] Notion that some persons may have a second [...]ight (as 'tis tear­med) and yet be themselves Innocent, I am satis­fied that he judgeth right. For this is common amongst the Laplanders, who are horribly addicted to Magical Incantations. They bequeath their Doemons to their Children as a Legacy, by whom they are often assisted (like Bewitched Persons, as they are) to see and do things beyond the power of Nature. An Historian who deserves Credit, relates, ^(p) that a certain Laplander gave him a true and particular Acco [...]t of what had happened to him in his Journey to Lapland. And further complained to him with Tears, [...]hat things at a g [...]ea [...] distance were Represented to him, and how much he desired to be Delivered from that Diabo­lical Sight, but could not. This doubtless was caused by some Inchantment. But to proceed to what I intend. The Eyes of Persons by reason of [...]anting Charms, may not only see what others [Page 25] do not, but be under such power of Fascination as that things which are not, shall appear to them as real. The Apostle speaks of B [...]w [...]ched Eyes. Gal. 3. 1. And we know from Scripture, that the I­maginations of men have by Inchantments been imposed upon. And Histories abound with very strange Instances of this Nature. The old Witch Circe by an [...]nch [...]nted Cup caused Ulysses his Com­panions to imagine themselves to be turned into Swine. And how many Witches have been them­selves so Bewitched by the Devil, as really to be­lieve that they were transformed into Wolves, or Dogs, or Cats. It is Reported of Simon Magus, ^(q) that by his Sorceri [...]s, he would so impose on the Imaginations of people, as that they thought he had really changed himself into another sort of Creature. Apollonius of Tyana could out-do Si­mon with his Magick. The great Bohemian Con­jurer Zyto ^(r) by his Inchantments caused certain Persons, whom he had a mind to try his Art upon, to imagine that their hands were turned into the feet of an Ox, or into the Hoofs of a Horse, so that they could not reach to the Dishes before them to take any thing thence. He Sold Wisps of Straw to a Butcher, who bought them for Swine That many such prestigious Pranks were played. by the unhappy Faustus, is attested by Camerarius, Wierus, Voetius, Lavater, and Lonicer.

There is newly Published a Book (mentioned in the Acta Eruditorum) wherein the Author ^(s) [Page 26] ( Wiechard Valvassor) relates that a Venetian Jew instructed him (only he would not attend his Instructions) how to make a Magical Glass which should represent any person or thing ac­cording as he should desire. If a Magician by an Inchanted Glass can do this, he may as well by the help of a Daemon cause false Idoeas of Persons and Things to be Impressed on the I­maginations of bewitched Persons. The Blood and Spirits of a Man, that is bitten with a Mad­ Dogg, are so envenomed, as that strange Im­pressions are thereby made on his Imagination. Let him be brought into a Room where there is a Looking-Glass, and he will (if put upon it) not only say but swear that he sees a Dog tho' in truth there is no Dog it may be within 20 Miles of him. And is it not then possible, for the Dogs of Hell to pey [...]on the Imaginations of miserable Creatures, so as that they shall believe & swear that such Persons hurt them as never did so? I have heard of an Inchanted Pin, that has caused the Condemnation and Death of many scores of Innocent persons. There was a Noto­rious Witchfinder in Scotland, that undertook by a Pin, to make an Infallible discovery of suspect­ed persons, whether they were Witches or not If when the Pin was run an Inch or two into into the Body of the Accused party, no blood ap­peared, nor any sense of Pain, then he declared them to be Witches. By means hereof my Au­thor tells me no less then 300 persons were [Page 27] condemned for witches in that Kingdom. This Bloody Jugler after he had done enough in Scot­land, came to the Town of Berwick upon Tweed. An honest man now living in New-England assureth me that he saw the man thrust a great Bras [...]e Pin two inches into the body of one that some would in that way try whether there was Witch­craft in the case or no. The Accused Party was not in the least sensible of what was done, and therefore in danger of receiving the Punishment justly due for Witchcraft. Only it so happened, that Collonel Fenwick (that worthy Gentleman, who many years since lived in New England) was then the Military Governour in that Town. He sent for the Mayor and Magistrates, advising them to be careful and cautious in their Proceedings. For he told them, it might be an Inchanted Pin, which the Witch-finder made use of. Whereupon the Magistrates of the place ordered that he should make his Experiment with some other Pin as they should appoint: But that he would by no means be induced unto, which was a sufficient Discovery of the Knavery and Witchery of the Witch-finder. There is a strange Diabolical Energy goeth along with Incantations. If Balak had not known that, he would not have sent for Balaam to see whether he could Inchant the Children of Israel. The Scripture intimates that Inchantments will keep a Serpent from biting, Eccles. 10. 11. A Witch in Sweedland confessed that the Devil gave her a wood­en Knife; and that if she did but touch any living [Page 28] thing with that Knife, it would dy immediately. And that there is a wonderful Power of the Devil attending things Inchanted, we have confirmed by a prodigious Instance in Major Weir a Scotch­man. That wretched man was a perfect Prodigy. A man of great parts; esteemed a Saint; yet liv­ed in secret Uncleanness with his own Sister for Thirty Four Years together. After his wicked­ness was discovered, he did not seem to be troubled at any of his Crimes, excepting that he had cau­sed a poor woman to be publickly whipped, be­cause she reported that she had seen him commit­ting Beastiality: which thing was true, only the woman could not prove it. This horrid Creature, if he had his Inchanted Staff in his hand, could pray to Admiration, and do extraordinary things, as is more amply related in the Postscript to Mr. Sin­clares his Book before mentioned. But if he had not his Inchanted Rod to Lean upon, he could not transform himself into an Angel of Light. But by all these things we may conclude, that it is not impossible, but that a guilty Conjurer, that so he may render himself the less suspected, may by his Magical Art and Inchantment cause Innocent Per­sons to be Represented as afflicting those whom the Devil and himself are the Tormentors of.

Arg. 5. The Truth we affirm is so evident, as that many Learned and Judicious Men have freely subscribed unto it:

[Page 29]The Memorable Relation of the Devils assuming the Shape of an Innocent Citizen in Zurick, is in the Judgement of that Great Divine, Lud Levater of weighty Consideration. And he declares that he does therefore mention it, that so Judges might be cautelous in their Proceedings in cases of this nature, inasmuch as the Devil does often in that way intangle Innocent Persons, and bring them into great Troubles. His words are ^(s) Hanc Historian ideo recito, ut Judices, in hujusmodi, Ca [...]ibus cauti [...]i [...]: Diab [...]l [...]s enim hac v [...]a [...]ape inno­centibus in [...]idiatur. He confirms what he faith by Reciting a Passage out of Alertus Granzius, who writes that the Devil was seen in the Shape of a No­ble man to come out of the Empress her Chamber. But to clear her Innocency she (according to the superstitious Ordeals then in fashion) walked blind­ [...]old over a great many of glowing hot Irons with­out touching any of them. Voetius in his ^(u) Dis­putation of Spectres, proposeth that Question, whe­ther the Devil may not untruly personate a Godly man, and answers in the Affirmative. And with­al adds, that it is a sufficient Argument ( Ad homi­nem) to answer the Papists with their own Histo­ries, which give Instances of Satan's appearing in the Figure of Saints, nay of Christ himself. And in his Discourse concerning the Operations of Doemons ^(w) he has the like Problem, whether the Devil may not possibly put on the Shape of a true Believer, a [Page 30] real Saint, not only of such as are dead, but still li­ving, and answers, Quidni? Why not? It is true Popish Casuists ^(x) do generally incline to the Negative In this Question. Neverthelese, the In­stance of Germanus who saw a company of honest people represented by the Devil as if they had bin feasting together, when they were really asleep in their beds, does a little puzzle them, so as that they are necessitated to take up with this Conclu­sion, ^(y) That by an extraordinary Permission of God, Innocent Persons may be Represented by Satan in the Noctural Conventicles of Witches. And if so, much more as afflicting Bewitched Persons. Delrio giv­eth an account of an Innocent Monk, whose Re­putation was indangered by a Daemons appearing in his Shape. He writes more like a Divine than Jesuites use to do, when he [...]aith that ^(z) It is not absolutely to be denied, but that the Devils may exhibit the Forms of Innocent Persons, if God permit it, who when he does permit it, usually by some Providen [...]s discovers the Fraud of the Devils, that so the Inno­cent may be vindicated, or if not, it is to bring them to Repentance for some Sin, or to try their Patience. It is rare to see such words dropping from the Pen of a Jesuit. As for Protestant Writers, I cannot call to mind one of any note, that does deny the possibility of the Affirmative, in the Question before us. Dr. Henkelius has [Page 31] lately ^(a) Published a Learned and Elaborate Discourse concerning the right Method of Cu­ring such as are Obsessed with Cacodaemons, in which he asserts, that Satan may possibly assume the Form of Innocent and Pious Persons, that so be might thereby destroy their Reputations, and expose them to undue Punishments. As for our English Divines, there are not many greater Casuists than Mr. Perkins. Nor do I know any one that has written on the case of Witchcraft with more Judgment and Clearness of Understanding. He has these words ^(b) ‘If a man being dan­gerously sick and like to dye upon Suspicion, will take it on his death, that such an one has Bewitched him, it is an allegation which may move the Judge to Examine the Party, but it is of no moment for Conviction.’ The like is asserted by ^(c) Mr. Cooper, Mr. Bernard, (once a famous Minister at Batcomb in Somerset) his Book called, A Guide to Grand-Jury-men in Cases of Witchcraft, is a solid and wise Treatise. What his Judgment was in the Case now under Debate, we may see, page 209, 210. Where his words are these: ‘An Apparition of the Party suspected, whom the Afflicted in their Fits seem to see, is a great suspicion. Yet this is but a Presumption tho' a strong one, because these Apparitions are wrought by the Devil, who can Represent to the [Page 32] Phantasy such as the Parties use to fear, in which his Representation he may as well lye as in his other Witness. For if the Devil can repre­sent to the Witch seeming Samuel, saying, I see Gods ascending out of the Earth, to beguile Saul, may we not think he can represent a com­mon ordinary Person, Man or Woman Unrege­nerate tho' no Witch to the Phantasy of vain persons, to deceive them and others that will give Credit to the Devil.’ Thus Mr. Bernard.

As for the Judgment of the Elders in New-Eng­land, so far as I can learn, they do generally con­curr with Mr. Perkins, and Mr. Bernard. This I know, that at a Meeting of Ministers at Cambridge, August 1. 1692. where were present seven Elders besides the President of the Colledge, the Question then discoursed on, was, Whether the Devil may not sometimes have a Permission to Represent an Innocent Person as tormenting such as are under Diabolical Mo­lestations? The Answer which they all concurred in was in these words, viz. That the Devil may sometimes have a Permission to Represent an Innocent Person as tormenting such as are under Diabolical Mo­lestations. But that such things are rare and extraordi­ry, especially when such Matters come before Civil Ju­dicatures. And that some of the most Eminent Ministers in the Land, who were not at that Meeting, are of the same Judgment, I am assured. And I am also sure, that in Cases of this Nature, the Priests [...]ips should keep Knowledge, and they [Page 33] should seek the Law at his Mouth, Mal. 2. 7.

Arg. 6. Our own Experience has confirmed the Truth of what we affirm.

I have in another Book given an account concer­ning Eliz. Knap, of Groton, who complained that a Woman as eminent for Piety, as any in that Town, did appear to her, and afflict her. But afterwards she was satisfied that that person never did her any harm, but that the Devil abused them both. A­bout two years ago, a bewitched person in Chelms­ford, in her Fitts, complained that a worthy good man a near relation of hers, did afflict her. So did she likewise complain of another person in that Town, of known Integrity and Piety.

I have my self known several of whom I ought to think that they are now in Heaven, considering that they were of good Conversation, and reputed Pious by those that had the greatest Intimacy with them, of whom nevertheless, some complai­ned that their Shapes appeared to them, and threat­ned them. Nor is this answered by saying, we do not know but those persons might be Witches. We are bound by the Rule of Charity to think other­wise. And they that censure any, meerly because much a sad Affliction as their being falsely represen­ted by Satan, has befallen them, do not do as they would be done by. I bless the Lord, it was never the portion allotted to me, nor to any Relation of mine to be thus abused. But no man knoweth what may happen to him, since There be just Men [Page 34] unto whom it hapneth according to the work of the Wicked. Eccles. 8. 14. But what needs more to be said, since there is one amongst ourselves whom no man, that knows him, can think him to be a Wizzard, whom yet some bewitched per­sons complained of, that they are in his Shape Tormented. And the Devils have of late, accused some Eminent Persons.

It is an awful thing which the Lord has done to convince some amongst us of their error. This then I Declare and Testify, that to take away the life of any one, meerly because a Spectre or Devil, in a Bewitched or Possessed person does accuse them, will bring the Guilt of Innocent Blood on the Land, where such a thing shall be done. Mercy forbid that it should, (and I trust that as it has not, it never will be so) in New-England. What does such an Evidence amount unto more then this. Either such an one did afflict such an one, or the Devil in his likeness, or his Eyes were bewitched.

The things which have been mentioned make way for, and bring us unto the Second Case, which is to come under our Consideration,

Viz.

If one Bewitched is struck down at the Look or Cast of the Eye of another, and after that Recovered again by a Touch from the same Person, is not this an infallible Proof that the Person Suspected and Complained of is in League with the Devil?

Answer; It must be owned that by such [Page 35] things as these Witchcrafts and Witches have been discovered more then once or twice. And that an ill Fame or other Circumstances attending the suspected Party, this may be a ground for Exa­mination; but this alone does not afford suffici­ent matter for Conviction. As Spectres or Devils appearing in the Shapes of men that have been murdered, declaring that they were murdered by such persons and in such a Place, may give just Occasion to the Magistrate for Enquiry into the matter. One great Witch-Advocate ^(d) confesseth that by this means Murders have been brought to Light; yet that alone, if other Cir­cumstances did not concurr, would not by the Law of God take away the Life of any man. If my Reader pleaseth, he shall hear what old Mr. Bernard of Batcomb faith to a Case not un­like to this, and the former. His words are these. ^(e) ‘The naming of the suspected in their Fits, and also where they have been, and what they have done here or there, as Mr. Throg­mortons Children could do, and that often and ever found true, This is a great Presumption; yet is this but a Presumption, because this is only the Devils Testimony, who can lye and that more often than speak Truth. Christ would not allow his witness of him in a point [Page 36] most true. Nor St. Paul in the due praises of him and Sylas. His witness then [...] be received as sufficient [...] life. [...] may accuse an Innocent, as I shewed before in Mr. Edmunds giving over his practice to find Sto [...]len Goods. And Satan we read would ac­cuse Job to God Himself to be an Hypocrite, and to be ready to be a Blasphemer. And he is called the Accuser of the Brethren. Albeit I cannot deny but this has very often proved true, yet seeing the Devil is such an one as you heard, Christian men should not take his wit­ness, to give in Verdict upon Oath, and so swear that the Devil has therein spoken the Truth. Be it far from good men to confirm any word of the Devil by Oath, if it be not an evident Truth without the Devils Testimo­ny, who in speaking the truth has a lying Intent, and speaks some truths ofthings done, which may be found to be so, that he may wrap with them some pernicious Lye, which cannot be tried to be true, but must rest upon his own Testimony to insnar [...] the Blood of the Innocent.’ Thus Mr. Bernard resolved the Case above sixty years ago; and truly in my Opinion like a Wise and Orthodox Divine, what he says, reacheth both this and the former Case. Doctor Cotta (a Learned Physician) in his Book about The Tryal of Witchcraft, shewing the true and right Method of the Discovery with a Confutation of Erroneous Ways (which Book he De­dicates [Page 37] to the Right Honourable Sir Edward Cook Lord Chief Justice of England) ^(f) He Dis­courses concerning the Exploration of Witches by the Touch of the Witch [...]uring the Touched Bewitched, and sheweth the Fallibility and Vanity of that way of Tryal, tho' he had often seen persons Bewitched in that way immediately delivered from the present Fit or Agony which was upon them. But he taketh it to be be a Diabolical Miracle. He argueth thus, ^(g) ‘No man can doubt but that the vertue wherewith this Touch was indued, is supernatural. If it be so, how can man, to whom nothing is simply possible that is not natural, be justly reputed an Agent there­in? If he cannot be esteemed in himself any possible or true Agent, then it remaineth that he can only be interessed therein as an Accessa­ry in Consent, or as a Servant unto a Superiour Power. If that Superiour Power be the Devil, the least reasonable doubt remaining, whether the Devil alone or with the Consent or Con­tract of the suspected person has produced that wonderful effect; with what Religion or Reason can any man incline rather to Credit the Devils mouth in the Bewitched, than to pity the Accu­sed,& believe them against the subtilty of a de­ceitful Devil. If the Devil by Divine Permis­sion [Page 38] may cause supernatural Concomitances and Consequences to attend the natural Actions of men without their Allowance, as is manifest in Possessed Per [...]ons, how is it reasonable and just that the Impositions of the Devil should be imputed unto any man. And (saith he) God forbid that the Devils Signs and Won­ders, nay his Truths should become auy legal Allegations or Evidences in Law. We may therefore conclude it unjust that the forenamed Miraculons Effect by the Devil wrought and imputed by the Bewitched, should be esteemed an infallible Mark against any man, as therefore convinced for that the Devil and the Bewitched have so dec [...]phered him?’ Thus that Learned Man. But to the case in hand, I have several things to offer.

1. It is possible that the Persons in Question may be Possessed with Cacodoemons. That be­witched Persons are many times really possessed with evil Spirits, is most certain. And as Mr. Perkins observes, no man can prove but that Witchcraft might be the cause of many of those Possessions, which we read of in the Gospel. And that Devils have been immitted into the Bodyes of miserable Creatures by Ma­gicians and Witches, Histories and Experience do abundantly testify. Hierom ^(h) relates [Page 39] concerning a certain Virgin, that a young man, whose Amours she despised, prevailed with a Magician to send an evil Spirit into her, by means whereof she was strangly be­forted. Tis reported ⁽ⁱ⁾ of Simon Magus that after he had used an Hellish Sacrifice, to be revenged of some that had called him a great Witch, he caused infernal Spirits to enter into them. Many confessing Witches have ac­knowledged that they were the cause of such and such Persons being Possessed by evil An­gels, as ^(k) Thyroeus and others have obser­ved. Now no Credit ought to be given to what Doemons in such, as are by them Ob­sessed, shall say. Our Saviour by his own une [...]ring Example has taught us not to receive the Devils Testimony in any thing. The Papists are justly Condemned for bringing Diabolical Testimony to confirm the Principles of their Religion. Peter Cotton the Jesuit ^(l) enq [...]red of the Devil in a Possessed. Person what was the clearest Scripture to prove Purgatory. At the time when Luther dyed, all the possessed people in the Netherlands were quiet. The Devils in them, said the [Page 40] reason was, because Luther ^(m) had been a great Friend of theirs, and they owed him that respect as to go as far as Germany to attend his Funeral. Another time when there was a talk of some Ministers of the reformed Religion, the Devils in the Obsessed laughed and said they were not at all afraid of them, for the Calvinists and they were very good Friends. The Jesuits insult with these Ti [...]ti­monie [...] as if they were divine Oracles. But the Father of Lies is never to be believed. He will uttet Twenty great Truths to make way for one lye. He will accuse Twenty Witches, if he can but thereby bring one Innocent Person into Trouble. He mixeth Truths with Lies, that so those Truths giving Credit unto Lies, men may believe both, -and so be deceived. And whereas some say that the Persons in Question are only bewitched and not possessed, let it be Considered that possessed persons are called Energumens from EPJOMAI Agitor. They whose Bodys are Preternaturally agitated, so as to be in danger of being thrown into the Fire or into the Water, though they may be bewitched, are undoubtedly possessed with Doemons. Mark 9. 22, 25. Learned men ^(a) give it as a most [Page 41] certain sign of possession, when the Afflicted party can see and hear that which no one else can discern any thing of, and when they can discover ^(†) secret things. Acts 16. 16. past, or future, ^(b) as a possessed person in Germany foretold the War which broke out in the year 1546. And when the Limbs of miserable Creatures are bent and dis [...]ted so as could not possible be without a Luxation of Joynts, were it not done by a preternatural hand, and yet no hurt, caused thereby, that argu­eth Possession. Also, when persons are by the Devil cast into Fits, in the which they speak of things, that afterwards they have no remembrance of ^(c) or, if they are by cruel Devils tortured, so as to cause horrendous Clamours in the Distres­sed Sufferers, that's another sign of Obsession by evil Spirits. If all these things concurr in the persons concerning where the Question is, we may conclude them to be Doemoniacks. And if so, no Juror can with a safe Conscience look on the Testimony of such, as sufficient to take away the Life of any man.

2. Falling down by the cast of an Eye proceeds not from a natural, but an Arbitrary Cause. Not [Page 42] from any Poyson in the Eye of the Witch, but from the Agency of some Doemon. The Opinion of Fascination by the Eye is an old Fable. And (saith Mr. Perkins) as fond as old. Pliny ^(o) speaks of a people that killed Folks by looking on them, and he adds that they had two Apples in each Eye. And Tally writes of women who had two Apples in one Eye that always did mischief with their meer Looks. So Ovid. Pupula duplex [...]ulminat. And Plutarch ^(p) writes that some persons have such a poyson in their Eyes as that their Friends and Familiars are fascinated thereby. Nay he speaks of one that Bewitched himself sick by looking on his own Face in a Glass Others write of Fascination by a meer Prolation of words. And for ought I know, there may be as much witchery in the Tongue as there is in the Eye. Sennertus ^(q) has discovered the Su­per [...]tition of these Fancies. Sight does not proceed from an Emission of Rayes from the Eye, but by a reception of the visible Species And if it be (as Philosophers conclude) and [...] Action and not an Emission of optick Spirits, so that sight as such, does receive some­thing from the Object, and not act upon it, the notion of Fascination by the Eye is unphiloso­phical. It is true, that sore Eyes will affect those [Page 43] that look upon them. Dum spectant Oculi Loesos, Loeduntur et ipsi, for which a natural Reason is easily to be assigned. But if the Witches eyes are thus infected with a natural Contagion, whence is it, that only Bewi [...]ed Persons are hurt thereby? if the vulgar Errour concerning the Basilisks killing with the Look of his poyson­ful eye, were a Truth, whatever person that Serpent cast his Eye upon would be poysoned. So if Witches had a physical Venome in their Eyess others as well as fascinated persons would be sensible thereof. There is as much Truth in this Phansy of Physical Venome in the Eye of a Witch, as there is in what Pliny ^(†) and others relate concerning the Thibians, viz. that they have two Apples in one Eye, and the Effigies of an Horse in the other Eye; and that they are a people that cannot be drowned:

3. As for that which concerns the Bewitched Per­sons being recovered out of their Agonies by the Touch of the Suspected Party, it is various and fallible.

For sometimes the Afflicted Person is made sick, (instead of being made whole) by the touch of the Accused. Sometimes the Power of Ima­gination is such as that the Touch of a Person in­nocent and not accused shall have the same effect. It is related in the Account of the Tryals of Witches at Bury in Suffolk 1664 during the time [Page 44] ^(r) of the Tryal there were some Experiments made with the persons afflicted, by bringing the Accused to touch them, and it was observed that by the least Touch of one of the supposed Witch­es, they that were in their Fitts, to all mens Ap­prehension wholly deprived of all sense and un­derstandings, would suddenly shriek out and open their hand.

Mr. S [...]rjeant Keeling, did not think that suffi­cient to Convict the Prisoners, for admitting that the Children were in Truth Bewitched, yet (saith he) it cannot be applyed to the Prisoners upon the Imagination only of the Parties Afflicted. For if that might be allowed, no Person whatsoever can be in safety, for perhaps they might fancy a­nother Person who might altogether be innocent in such matters. To avoid this Scruple it was privately desired by the Judge, that some Gentle­men there in Court, would attend one of the dist­ [...]mpered Persons in the farther part of the Hall, whilst she was in her Fitts, and then to send for one of the Witches to try what would happen, which they did accordingly. One of them was convey'd from the Barr, and brought to the Af­flicted Maid. They put an Apron before her Eyes, and then another person (not the Witch) touched her, which produced the same Effect, as the Touch of the Witch did in the Court. Where­upon [Page 45] the Gentlemen returned much unsatisfyed. Bodin ^(s) relates that a Witch who was tryed at Nants, was commanded by the Judges to touch a bewitched person, a thing often pract­ised by the Judges of Germany in the Imperial Chamber. The Witch was extreamly unwilling, but being Compelled by the Judges, she cryed out, I am undone; and as soon as ever she touched the Afflicted person, the Witch fell down dead, and the other recovered. That horrid Witch of Salisbury, Ann Bodenbam ^(t) who had been Servant to the Notorious Con­jurer Dr. Lamb, could not bear the sight of one that was Bewitched by her. Assoon as e­ver she saw the Afflicted Person, she ran about shrieking, and crying, and roaring, after an Hideous manner, that the Devil would Tear her in pieces, if that Person came near her. And whilst the Witch was in such Torment, the Bewitched was at case, By these things we see that the Laws and Customes of the King­dome of Darkness are not always and in all places the same.

And it is good for men to concern them­selves with them as little as may be.

[Page 46]I think there is weight in Dr. Cotta's ^(u) Argument, Viz.

That the Gift of healing the Sick and Possessed was a special Grace and Favour of God, for the Con­firmation of the Truth of the Gospel, but that such a Gift should be annexed to the Tonch of Wicked Witches, as an infallible sign of their Guilt, is not easy to be believed. It is a thing well known, that if a Person possessed by an Evil Spirit, is (as oft it so happens) never so outragious whilst a good man is Praying with, and for the Afflicted, let him lay his hand on them, and the Evil Spirit is quiet. I hope this is no evidence of any Covenant, or vo­luntary Communion between the Good man that is Praying and the Evil Spirit. No more does the Case before us, Evince any such thing.

4. There are that Question the Lawfulness of the Experiment. For it this healing power in the Witch is not a Divine but a Diabolical Gift, it may be dangerous to meddle too much with it. If the Witch may be ordered to Touch Afflicted Persons in order to their healing or recovery, out of a sick Fitt, why may not the Diseased person be as well ordered to Touch the Witch for the same cause? And if to touch him, why not to scratch him and fetch Blood out of him, which is but an harder kind of Touch? But as for this Mr. Perkins doubts not to call it, a Practice of Witchcraft, It is not safe to meddle with any of the Devils Sacraments or Institutions. For My own part, I should be loath [Page 47] to say to a man, that I knew or thought was a Witch, do you lock on such a Person, and see if you can Witch them into a Fitt. And there is such an Afflicted Person do you take them by the Hand, and see if you can Witch them well again. If it is by vertue of some Contract with the Devil, that Witches have power to do such things it is hard to conceive how they can be bid to do them, without being too much concerned in that Hellish Covenant. I take it to be (as elsewhere ^(w) I have expressed) a solid Principle, which the Learned Sennertus insists on, Viz. That they who force ano­ther to do that which be cannot possibly do, but by vertue of a Compact with the Devil, have themselves implicit­ly Communion, with the Diab [...]lical Covenant. The Devil is pleased and honoured, when any of his Institutions, are made use of. This way of dis­covering Witches is no better than that of putting the Urine of the Afflicted Person into a Bottel that so the Witch may be Tormented, and Dis­covered. The Vanity and Superstition of which practice I have formerly shewed, and Testifyed against. There was a Conjurer his Name was Edward Drake ^(x) who taught a man to use that Experiment for the Relief of his Afflicted Daughter, who found benefit thereby. But we ought not to practice Witch­crafts to discover Witches, nor may we make use [Page 48] of a White healing Witch (as they call them) to find out a Black and Bloody one. And how did men first come to know that Witches would be disco­vered in such wayes as these, which have been mentioned? If Satan himself were the first disco­verer (as there is reason to believe) the experi­ment must needs have deceit in it. see Dr. Willet on Exod: 7. Quest. 9. And such Experiments better become Pagans or Papists than Professors in New England; whereas 'tis pleaded, that such things are practised by the Judges of the Imperial Chamber, I Reply, that those Judges (as Bodia relates, Lib. [...]. Daemon. Cap. 6.) have required suspected Witches to pronounce over the afflicted persons, these words, I Bless thee in the Name of the Father, &c. upon which they have immediately recove­red; but is the [...] day come upon us, that such Superstitions as these shall be practised in New-England. The Lord Jesus forbid it. See Baldwins his Testimony against the Practice of the Camera Imperia [...]is. Cas. Consc. [...]. 3. c. 3. page 634.

5. If the Testimony of a Bewitched or Possessed Person, is of Validity as to what they see done to themselves, then it is so as to others, whom they see [...] less then themselves. But what they af­firm concerning others, is not to be taken for E­vidence. Whence had they this Supernatural Sight? It must needs be either from Heaven or from Hell. If from Heaven, (as Elisha's Servant [Page 49] and Balaams Ass could discern Angels) let th [...]ir Testimony be received. But if they had t [...]is Knowledge from Hell, tho' there may possibly be truth in what they affirm, they are not leg [...]l Witnesses. For the Law of God allows of no Revelation from any other Spirit but himself, Isai. 8. 19. It is a Sin against God to make use of the Devils help to know that which cannot be otherwise known. And I te [...]ti [...]ie against it, as a great Transgression, which may justly provoke the Holy One of Israel, to let loose Devils on the whole Land. Luk. 4. 35. See Mr. Bernards Guide to Juries in cases of Witchcraft. p. 1 [...]6, 137, 138. And Brochmand. Theol. de Angelis p. 227. Altho the Devil Accusations may be so far re­garded as to cause an Enquiry into the Truth of things. Job 1. 11, 12. & 2. 5, 6. yet not so as to be an Evidence or ground of Conviction. The Persons, concerning whom the Question is, [...]ee things through Diabolical Mediums. On which account their Evidence is not meer hu­mane Testimony. And if it be in any part Di­ [...]bolical, it is not to be owned as Authentick. For the Devils Testimony ought not to be receiv­ [...]d neither in whole, nor in part. [...]. I am told by credible persons, who say it is certainly true, that [...] Bewitched Person has complained that she was [...]a [...]t into Fits by the Look of a Dog; and that [...]he was no more able to bear the sight of that Dog, then of the person whom she accused as Be­witching [Page 50] her. And that thereupon the Dogg was shot to death. This Dog was no Devil: for then they could not have killed him. I s [...]p­pose no one will say that Dogs are Witches. It remains then that the casting down with the Look is no infallible sign of a Witch.

7. It has always been said, that it is a difficult thing to find out Witches. But if the Represen­tation of such a person as afflicting, or the Look or Touch be an infallible proof of the guilt of Witchcraft in the persons complained of, 'tis the easiest thing in the world to discover them. For it is done to our hand, and there needs no enquiry into the matter.

8. Let them say this is an infallible Proof, produce any word out of the Law of God which does in the least countenance that Assertion. The Word of God instructs Jurors and Judges to proceed upon clear humane Testimony. Deut. 35. 30. But the word no where giveth us the least Intimation, that e­very one is a Witch, at whose Look the Bewitch­ed person shall fall into Fits. Nor yet that any other means should be used for the discovery of Witches, then what may be used for the finding out of Murderers, Adulterers, and other Crimi­nals.

9. Sometimes Antipathies in Nature have strange and unaccountable Effects. I have read of a man that at the sight of his own Son, who was no Wizzard would fall into Fits. There [Page 51] that find in their Natures an averseness to some persons whom they never saw before, of which they—give no better an account then he in Martial. Concerning Sabidius.

Non Amo te Sabidi, nec possum dicere quare.

That some Persons at the sight of Bruit-Creatures Cats, Spiders, &c. Nay, at the sight of Cheeses, Milk, Apples, will fall into Fitts, is too well known to be denied. De [...]singius in his Learned Discourse De Pulvere Sympat [...]tico. P. 128. Saith, there was one in the City of Groning that could not bear the sight of a Swines Head. And that he knew a­nother who was not able to look on the Picture thereof. Amatus Lusitanus speaks of one that at the sight of a Rose would swoon away. This pro­veth that the Falling into a Fitt, at the Sight of a­nother is not always a sign of Witchcraft. It may proceed from Nature and the Power of Imagination.

To conclude; judicious Casuists ^(†) have deter­mined, that to make use of those Media to come to the knowledge of any matter, which have no such power in them by Nature, nor by Divine Instituti­on, is an Implicit going to the Devil to make a Dis­covery: Now there is no Natural Power in the look or touch of a Person to bewitch another. Nor is this by Divine Institution the means whereby Witchcraft is Discovered. Therefore it is an un­warrantable practise.

We proceed now to the third Case Proposed to Consideration, If the things which have been men­tioned [Page 52] are not infallible Proofs of Guilt in the Accu­sed party, it is then Q [...]e [...]i [...]d, Whether there are any Discoveries of this Crime, which Jurors and Judges may with a safe Conscience proceed upon to the Conviction and Condemnation of the Persons under Suspicion?

Let me here premise two things,

1. The evidence in this Crime ought to be as clear as in any other Crimes of a Capital Nature. The word of God does no where intimate, that a less clear evidence, or that fewer or other witnes­ses may be taken as sufficient to convict a man of Sorcery, which would not be enough to convict him were he charged with another evil worthy of Death. Numb; 35. 30. if we may not take the Oath of a distracted person or of a possessed person in a case of Murder, Theft, Felony of any sort, then neither may we do it in the Case of witchcraft.

2. Let me premise this also, that there have been wayes of trying witches long used in many Nations, Especially in the dark times of Paganism and Pope­ty which the righteous God never approved of. But which as (judicious Mr. Perkins expresseth it in plain English) were invented by the Devil, that so Innocent Persons might be condemned, and some notorious witches escape. Yea, many superstitions and Magical experiments have been used to try witches by. Of this sort is that of scratching the witch, or seething the urin of the Bewitched person, or making a witch-cake with that urine. And that Trial of putting their hands into scalding water, to see if it will not hurt them. And that of sticking an Awle under the seat of the suspected [Page 53] party yea, and that way of discovering witches by tying thei [...] hands and feet, and casting them on the water, to try whether they will sink or swim. I did publickly bear my Testimony against this supersti­tion in a Book Printed at Boston Eight years past.

I hear that of late some in a Neighbour Colony have been playing with this diabolical invention. It is to be Lamented that in such a Land of upright­ness as New-England once was, a practice which Pro­testant writers generally condemn as sinful, and which the more sober and I earned men amongst Papists themselves have not only judged unlawful but (to express it in their owne Terms) to be no less than a Mortal Sin, should ever be heard of. Were it not that the Coming of Christ to Judge tee earth draw [...]th near, I should think that such Practises are an unhappy omen that the Devil and Pagans will get these dark Territories into their Possession again. But that I may not be thought to have no Reason for my calling the impleaded Experiment into Question, I have these these things further to all [...]dge against it.

1. It has been rejected long agon, by Christian Nations as a thing Superstitious and diabolical. In Italy and Spain it is wholly disused. And ^(a) in the Low Countreys, and in France, where the Judges are Men of Learning. In some parts of Germany old Pag [...]anish Customs are observed more then in o­ther Countreys, nevertheless all the ^(b) Accade­mies [Page 54] throughout Germany have disapproved of this way of Purgation.

2 The Devil is in it.All Superstition is from him.And when secret things, or [...]atent Crimes, are discovered by Superstitious practices, some Compact and Com­munion with the Devil is the Cause of it, as Austin ^(c) has truly inti [...]ted. And so it is here. For if a Witch cannot be drowned, this must proceed either from some natural cause, which it doth not, for it is against nature for humane Bodies, when hands and feet are tyed, not to sink under the water Besides, they that plead for this superstition, say that if Witches happen to be Condemned for some o­ther Crime and not for Witchcraft, they will not swim like a Cork above Water, which shew­eth that the cause of this Natation is not Physical. And if not, then either it must proceed from a Di­vine Miracle to save a Witch from Drowning; or lastly, it must be a Diabolical Wonder. This superstitious Experiment is commonly known by the Name of, The Vulgar Probation, because it was never appointed by any lawful Authority, but from the Suggestion of the Devil taken up by the rude Rabble. And some ^(d) learned men are of O­pinion, that the first Explorator (being a White Witch) did Explicity covenant with the Devil, that he should discover [...]atent Crimes in this way: And that it is by vertue of that first Contract that the Devil goeth to work to keep his servants from sinking, when this Ceremony of his ordaining is used. Moreover, we know that Di [...]bolus est Dei Simia, the Devil seeks to [Page 55] imitate Divine Miracles. We read in Ecclesiastical Story, that some of the Martyrs when they were by Persecutors ordered to be drowned, prov'd to be immersible. This Miracle would the Devil imi­tate in causing Witches, who are his Martyrs not to sink when they are cast into the Waters.

3. This way of Purgation is of the same nature with the old Ordeals of the Pagans If men were accu­sed with any crime, to clear their innocency they were to take an hot Iron into their hands, or to suffer sc [...]lding water to be poured down their throats, & if they received no hurt thereby they were acquit­ted. This was the Devils invention, and many times (as the Devil Would have it) they that submitted to these Trials, suffered no Inconvenience. Ne­vertheless, it is astonishing to think what inno­cent Blood has been shed in the World by means of this Satanical Device. Witches have often (as ^(e) Sprenger observes) desired that they might stand or fall by this Tryal by hot Iron, and sometimes come off well. Indeed, this Ordeal was used in other Cases and not in Cases of Witch­craft only. And so was the Vulgar Probation by casting into the Water practiced upon persons ac­cused ^(f) with other Crimes as well as that of Witchcraft. How it came to be restrained to that of Witchcraft, I cannot tell. It is as Supernatural for a Body whose hands and feet are tyed to Swim above the Water, as it is for their hands not to feel a red hot Iron. If the one of these Ordeals is law­ful [Page 56] to be used, then so is the other too. But as for the fiery Ordeal it is rejected and exploded out of the World; for the same reason then the Tryal by Water should be so.

4. It is a Tempting of God when men put the Innocency of their Fellow-Creatures upon such Tryals. To desire the Almighty to shew a Mira­cle to clear the Innocent, or to Convict the guil­ty is a most Presumptuous Tempting of him. Was it not a Miracle when Peter was kept from Sinking under the Water by the Omnipotency of Christ. As for Satan, we know that his ambition is to make his Servants believe that his Power is equal to Gods, and that therefore he can preserve whom he pleaseth. I have read ^(g) of certain Magici­ans, who were seen walking on the Water. If then Guilty persons shall Float on the Waters, either it is the Devil that causeth them to do so, (as no doubt it is) and what have men to do to set the Devil on work; or else it is a divine Miracle, like that of Peters not Sinking, or that of the Iron that Swam at the word of Elisha. And shall men try whether God will work a Miracle to make a Discovery? If a Crime cannot be found out but by Miracle, it is not for any Judge on Earth to usurp that Judgment which is reserved for the Di­vine Throne.

5. This pretended Gift of Immersibility attend­ing Witches is a most fallible deceitful thing. For many a Witch has sunk under the water. G [...]del­mannus ^(h) giveth an account of six notorious and [Page 57] clearly convicted Witches, that when they were brought to their vulgar Probation, sunk down under the water like other persons; Althusius affirms the like concerning others in the ⁽ⁱ⁾ Bohemian History it is related that Uratslaus the King of Bohemia, extirpated Witches out of his King­dom, some of which he delivered to the Ax, o­thers of them to the Fire, and others of t [...]em [...] caused to be Drowned. If Witches are imme [...]si­ble, how came they to dye by drowning in Bohe­mia? Besides, it has sometimes been known that persons who have floated on the water when the Hangman has made the Experiment on them, have sunk down like a Stone, when others have made the Trial.

6. The Reasons commonly alledged for this Su­perstition are of no moment. It is said they hate the water; whereas they have many times desired that they might be cast on the water in order to their purgation. It is alledged, that water is used in Baptism, therefore Witches swim. A weak Phan­ [...]y. All the water in the world is not consecrated Water. Cannot Witches eat Bread or drink Wine, notwithstanding those Elements are made use of in the Blessed Sacrament. But (say some) the De­vils by sucking of them make them so light that the water bears them. Whereas some Witches are twice as heavy as many an innocent Person. Well, but then they are Possessed with the Devil. Suppose so; Is the Devil afraid if they should sink, [...] he should be drowned with them? But [...] then [Page 58] we [...] the Gadarens Hogs drowned when the Devil was in them?

These things being premised, I answer the Que­stion Affirmatively. There are Proofs for the Con­viction of Witches which Jurors may with a safe Con­science proceed upon, so as to bring them in Guilty. The Scripture which [...]aith, Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live, clearly implies, that some in the world may be known and proved to be Witches. For until they be so, they may and must be suffered to live. More­over we find in Scripture that some have been con­victed and executed for Witches. For Saul cut off those that had familiar Spirits, and the Wizzards out of the Land, 1 Sam. 28. 9.

It may be wondred that Saul who did like him that said, Flectere si nequeo Superos Ac [...]eronta Movebo, should cause the Wizzards in the land to be put to death. The Jewish Rabbies say, the reason was be­cause those Wizzards foretold that David should be King. It is (as Mr. Gaul ^(k) observes) the o­pinion of some learned Protestants, that Saul in his Zeal did overdo. And that under the Pretext ^(l) of Witches he slew the Gibeonites, for which that Judgment followed. 2 Sam. 21. 1. Neither (saith Mr. Gaule) want we the storied Examples of Gods Judgments upon those that defamed, prosecuted and exe­cuted them for Witches that indeed were none. But we have in the Scripture the Example of a better Man than Saul to encourage us to make Enquiry after [Page 59] Wizzards & Witches in order to their Conviction and Execution. This did the rarest King that e­ver lived, cause to be done, Viz. Josiah. 2▪ Kings 23. 24. The Workers with Familiar Spirits and the Wizzards, that were spied in the Land of Judah, did Josiah put away, that he might perform the words of the Law. It seems there were some that sought to hide those Workers of Iniquity, but that incom­parable King [...]pied them out, and rid the Land & the World of them.

Q. But then the Enquiry is, What is sufficient Proof?

A. This Case has been with great Judgment answered by several Divines of our own, particu­larly by Mr. Perkins, and Mr. Bernard. Also Mr. John Gaule a worthy Minister at Staughton in the County of Huntington, has published a very Judici­ous Discourse, called Select Cases of Conscience touch­ing Witches and Witchcrafts, Printed at London A. D. 1646. wherein he does with great Prudence and Evidence of Scripture-light handle this and other Cases. Such Jurors as can obtain those Books, I would advise them to read and seriously as in the fear of God to Consider them. And so far as they keep to the Law and to the Testimony, & speak ac [...]ording to that Word, receive the Light which is in them. But the Books being now rare to be had, let me express my Concurrence with them in these two particulars.

1. That a free and Voluntary Confession of the Crime made by the Person Suspected and Accused after Exami­nation, is [...] sufficient ground of Conviction.

[Page 60]Indeed, if Persons are Distracted or under the Power of Phrenetick Melancholy that alters the case. But the Jurors that examine them, and their Neigh­bours that know them may easily determine that case. Or if Confession be ^(m) extorted, the E­vidence is not so clear and Convictive. But if a­ny Persons out of Remorse of Conscience, or from a Touch of God on their Spirits, confess and shew their Deeds, as the Converted Magicians in Ephesus did Act. 19. 18, 19. Nothing can be more clear. Suppose a man to be suspected for Murder, or for Committing a Rape, or the like Nefandous Wickedness, if he does freely confess the Accusation that's ground enough to condemn him. The Scrip­ture approveth of Judging the wicked Servant out of his own Mouth. Luk. 19. 22. It is by some ob­jected that persons in Discontent may falsely accuse themselves. I say, if they do so, and it cannot be proved, that they are false Accusers of themselves, they ought to dye for their Wickedness, and their Blood will be upon their own Heads. The Jury, the Judges, and the Land is clear. I have read a ve­ry sad and amazing and yet a true story to this purpose

There was in the Year 1649 in a Town called Lauder in Scotland a certain woman accused and im­prisoned on suspicion of witchcraft. When others in the same prison with her, were convicted, and their Execution ordered to be on the Monday following, she desired to speak with a Minister, to whom she [Page 61] declared freely that she was guilty of Witchcraft, acknowledging, also many other Crimes committed by her, desiring that she might dye with the Rest. She said particularly that she had Covenanted with the Devil, and was become his Servant, about twenty years before, and that he Kissed her, and gave her a Name, but that since he had never owned her. Se­veral Ministers who were jealous that she accused herself untruly, charged it on her Conscience, telling her that they doubted she was under a Temptation of the Devil to destroy her own Body & Soul, and ad [...]juring her in the Name of God to declare the Truth. Notwithstanding all this, she sti [...]ly adhered to what she had said, & was on Monday morning Condemned and ordered to be Executed that day. When she came to the place of Execution, she was silent until the Prayers were ended. Then going to the Stake where she was to be Burn't; she thus expressed her­self, All you that see me this Day! Know ye that I am to Dye as a Witch by my own Confession? and I free all men, especially the Ministers, and Magistrates from the Guilt of my Blood! I take it wholly on my self, and as I must make answer to the God of Heaven, I declare I am as free from Witchcraft as any Child, but being ac­cused by a Malicious Woman, and imprisoned under the Name of a Witch, my Husband and Friends disowned [...], and seeing no hope of ever being in Credit a­gain, through the Temptation of the Devil, I made that Confession to destroy my own Life, being weary of it, and abusing rather to Dye than to Live. This her La­mentable Speech did astonish all the Spectators, few [Page 62] of whom could refrain from Tears. The Truth of this Relation (saith my ⁽ⁿ⁾ Author) is certain­ly attested by a Worthy Divine now living, who was an Eye and an Ear-witness of the whole mat­ter. But thus did that Miserable Creature suffer Death. And this was a just Execution. When the Amalekite confessed that he killed Saul, whom he he had no legal Authority to meddle with, altho 'tis probable that he belied himself, David gave order for his Execution, and said to, him, Thy Blood be upon thy head, for thy Mouth hath Testifyed against thee. 2. Sam. 1. 16. But as for the Testimony of Con­fessing Witches against others, the case is not so clear as against themselves. They are not such Credible Witnesses, as in a Case of Life and Death is to be de­sired. It is beyond dispute, that the Devil makes his Witches to dream strange things of themselves and others which are not so. There was (as Authors be­yond Exception relate) in appearance a sumptuous feast prepared, the wine & meat set forth in Vessels of Gold.A certain person whom an amorous young man had fallen in Love with was represented and sup­posed to be really there, but Appollonius Tyanoeus ^(o) discovered the Witchery of the Business, and in an instant all vanished, and nothing but dirty Coales were to be seen. The like to this is men­tioned in the Arausican Council. There were certain women that Imagined, they road upon Beasts in the night, and that they had Diana and [Page 63] Herod [...]as in Company with them, besides a Troop of other persons. The Council giveth this sen­tence on it, Satanas qui se trans [...]igurat in Angelum Lucis, transformat se in divers [...]rum pers [...]narum species, et mentem quam captivam tenet, in somnis deludi [...]. Satan transforms himself into the likeness of diverse persons, and deludes the Souls that are his Captives with Dreams and Pha [...]sies. See Dr. Willet on 1 Sam. 28. page 165. What Credit can be given to those that say they can turn men into Horses? If so, they can as well turn Horses into men. But all the Witches on earth in Conjunction with all the Devils in Hell, can never make or unmake a rational Soul; and then they cannot transform a Bruit into a man, nor a man into a Bruit. So that this Transmutation is Phantastical. The Devil may, and often does impose on the Imaginations of his Witches and Vassals, that they believe them­selves to be Converted into Beasts, and reverted into men again. As Nebucadnezzar whilest under the Power of a Doemon really imagined himself to be an Ox, and would lye out of Doors and eat Grass. The Devil has inflicted on many a man the Disease called Lycanthropia, from whence they have made Lamentable Complaints of their being Wolves. In a word, there is no more Reality in what many Witches confess of strange things seen or done by them whilest Satan had them in his full Power, than there is in Lucian's Ridiculous Fa­ble of his being bewitched into an Asse, and what strange Feats he then played. So that what such [Page 64] persons relate concerning Persons and Things at Witch-meetings, ought not to be received with too much Credulity. I could mention dismal Instan­ces of Innocent Blood which has been shed by means of the Lies of some confessing Witches. There is a very sad Story mentioned in the Preface to the Relation of the Witchcrafts in Sweedland, how that in the year 1676. at Stockholm, a young wo­man accused her own Mother (who had indeed been a very bad woman, but not guilty of Witch­craft, and Swore that she had carried her to the Nocturnal meetings of Witches, upon which the Mother was burnt to death. Soon after the Daughter came crying and howling before the Judges in open Court, declaring that to be revenged on her Mother for an Offence received, she had falsely accused her with a Crime which she was not guilty of: for which she also was justly Exe­cuted. A most wicked man in [...], freely Con­fessed himself to be a Magician; and accused ma­ny others whose Lives were thereupon taken from them, and a whole Province had like to have been ruined thereby; but the imposture was discovered. The Confessing pretended Wizzard was burnt at Paris in the year 1668. I shall only take notice further of an awful Example mentioned by A. B. Spotswood in his History of Scotland. p. 449. His words are these. ‘This Summer ( Viz. Anno. 1997.) There was a great business for the Try­al of Witches; amongst others one Margaret Atkin being apprehended on Suspicion and threatned [Page 65] with Torture, did confess herself Guilty. Being Examined touching her Associates in that Trade, she named a few, and perceiving her Delations find Credit, made offer to detect all of that sort, and to purge the Country of them; so she might have her Life granted. For the reason of her Knowledge, she said, that they had a secret mark all of that sort in their Eyes, whereby she could surely tell, how soon she Looked upon any, whether they were Witches or not. And in this, she was so readily believed, that for the space of 3 or 4 Moneths she was carried from Town to Town to make Discoveries in that kind. Many were brought in Question by her Delations, especially at Glas­gow, where diverse Innocent women, through the Credulity of the Minister Mr. John Cowper, were condemned and put to death. In the end she was found to be a meer deceiver, and sent back to Fife, where she was first apprehended. At her Tryal she Affirmed all to be false that she had confessed of her self or others, and persisted in this to her death, which made many fore-think their too great Forwardness that way, and moved the King to recal his Commissions given out against such persons, discharging all Proceedings against them, except in case of Voluntary Con­fession, till a solid Order should be taken by the Estates touching the form that should be kept in their Tryal.’ Thus that famous Historian

2 If two credible Persons shall affirm upon Oath that they have [...] the Party accused speaking such words, or doing things which none but such as have Familiarity [Page 66] with the Devil ever did or can do, that's a sufficien [...] Ground for Conviction.

Some are ready to say, that Wizzards are not so unwise as to do such things in the Sight or Hearing of others. But it is certain that they have very often been known to do so. How often have they been seen by others using Inchantmen [...]s? Conjuring to raise Storms? And have been heard calling upon their Familiar Spirits? And have been known to use Spells and Charms? And to shew in a Glass or in a Shew-stone persons absent? And to reveal Secrets which could not be discovered but by the Devil? And have not men been seen to do things which are above humane strength that no man li­ving could do, without Diabolical Assistances? C [...]au­di [...] was seen by witnesses enough, to draw a Ship which no humane strength could move. Tuccia a Ve [...]tal Virgin was seen to carry water in a Sieve. The Devil never assists men to do supernatural things undesired. When therefore such like things shall be Testified against the accused party not by Spe­ [...]t [...]es which are Devils in the Shape of persons either living or dead, but by real men or women who may be cred [...]ted, it is proof enough that such an one has that Conversation and Correspondence with the Devil as that he or she, whoever they be, ought to be exterminated from amongst men. This notwithstanding, I will add; It were better that Ten Suspected [...]itches should escape, than that one Innocent Person should beCondemned. That is an old saying and true, Prestat reum no [...]ntem ab­solvi, [Page 67] quam [...]x pro [...]ibitis [...] & illegitima [...] condemn [...]d [...] It is better that a Guilty Person should be ABSOLVED, than that he should without sufficient ground of Convict­ion be condemned. I had rather judge a Witch to be an honest woman, than judge an honest woman as a witch. The Word of God directs men not to proceed to the Execution of the most capital offen­ders, untill such time as upon searching diligently the matter is found to be a Truth, and the thing certain. Deu. 13. 14. 15.

An Acquaintance ^(p) of mine at London in his description of New-England declares, that as to their Religion, the People there are like Mr. Perkins. It is no dishonour to us, if that be found true. I am sorry that any a­mongst us begin to slight so great a man, whom the most ^(q) Learned in Forr [...]ign Lands, speak of with Ad­miration, on the account of his polite and acute Judgment. It is a grave and good Advice which he giveth in his Dis­course of Witchcrafts. (Chap 7. Sect. 2.) wherewith I con­clude. I would therefore wish and advise all Jurors who give their Verdict upon Life and Death in Courts of Assizes, to take good heed that as they be diligent in zeal of Gods Glory, and the good of his Church, in detecting of Witches, by all sufficient and lawful means, so likewise they would be careful what they do, and not to Condemn any party Suspected upon bare Presumptions, without sound and sufficient proofs, that they be not guilty through their own Rashness of Shedding Inno­cent Blood.

Boston, New-England, Octob, 3. 1692.