1. WHether it be not most safe for our Lord the King, to continue and keep in force all the old Sta­tutes and Laws, made for the good of his Sub­jects, he being sworn so to do at his Corona­tion and Annointing, and not to suffer any Parliament to make or bring him any Bill, or himself to sign the same, for the nulling there­of? because he is sworn to keep them all.

2. Whether it be not safe for our Lord the King, to fulfil all the Contents of his Declarations and Remonstrances, before his Corona­tion; with his large Promises upon the Word of a King, to assure all his Subjects of the truth thereof, when there is no Act, nor Statute-Law in force, to hinder the effectual performance of the same? And whe­ther any Act made by any ensuing Parliament, to obstruct the Peoples enjoyment of those declared Promises, be not very prejudicial to his Royal Word and Person?

3. Whether it be not safe for the King, to conveen Parliaments by the general Suffrages of the People, as in the first Parliament of Edw. 3^d, after Writs published and Proclamation made, and not by Letters of Election, &c. Numb. 2. and that none should come Armed with Weapons to the Parliament? And whether those Parliaments ought not to act according to the best example of Parliaments, (viz.) that in the 13th of Edward the 3d, Num. 8, 9. who durst not give their Consents to any Bill, for the sessing any Tax, upon the Ninth Sheaf of [Page 4] their Corn, Ninth Fleece and Lamb, &c, until they had advised with the Commons and Freemen in the Country, that chose them? And whether the Statute in the 34th of Edward the first, chap. 1. That no Tallage nor Aid, &c. should be levied, by Us, or our Heirs, in our Realm▪ without the Consent, not only of Archbishops, Bishops, Earls, Barons, Knights, Burgesses, &c. but all other Freemen of the Land, was not the ground of their so doing? and whether other Statutes, of a later date, do not express the same order? as the Statute in the 14th of Edw. the 3d, chap. 21. and the Statute in the 25th of Edw. the 3d, chap. 8. and the Stat. of the 36th of Edw. the 3d. and the Petitions of Right in the 3d of Charles the first. By which Statute, and other good Statutes of this Realm, nothing ought to be against the inherited Freedom of the Subjects, and that they should not be brought, nor compelled to contribute any Tax, Tallage, Aid, or other like charge, not set by common consent in Parliament; and whether this common consent in Parliament, be not according to the Examples afore-men­tioned? and whether Parliaments that act contrary, be not the only enemies to the Statute-Laws and their Country?

4. Whether it be not safe for the King, according to the contents of the 30th chap. of Magna Charta, that the Lands, Rents, Goods of alien Marchants, Papists, &c. residing in England, be seized and secu­red, to prevent the giving of Intelligence how to plot or undermine his Government? and whether it was not upon this ground, the express Statute of 2. Hen. 4. chap. 12, 20. 1 Hen. 4 chap. 7, 8. 3 Hen. 5. ch. 3. 4 Hen. 5. ch. 6. 1 Hen. 6. ch. 3. That neither Irish, Welch­men Brittons, &c. should purchase House or Land in any place of the Realm, or to reside or be in either Court, Fort, Town, or City, in the same to prevent Treachery? and whether this would not be a good work to be done now, to prevent an inundation of Popery? and whe­ther the Statute in the 23d of Elizabeth, chap. 4. enjoyn not the same.

5. Whether it be not safe for our Lord the King, to uphold and maintain onely one universal and general Interest, and to make no dif­ference between himself and Subjects? since Nature hath provided life to be either in body or head no longer than they are united; and if only to regard the head, and neglect the body, be not the only way to bring a ruine and death upon both? And whether the power to grant Patentees and Protections to some few, that abuse the rest of his loyal Subj [...]cts, be not the preserving of a particular Interest, and not the general?

2ly. Since particular Interests are promoted,

1. Whether it be not the duty of every English-man to preserve his Right and Freedom, being his inheritance provided him by Nature and the Statute-Laws, and to suppress all that violate them? And if those that promote particular Interest, do apprehend, try, judge, and kill them for doing their duty, whether then those are not Martyrs for their Country? and whether all those that have performed their duty in the like kind, within these twenty one years, whether they lost their lives in the field or otherwise, were not Martyrs for their Country also? and whether the People can be safe if they neglect their duty?

2. Whether it be not the Peoples Right, to have all Promises from their Liege Lord performed, that he hath promised them for the en­joyment of their Common, Civil, and Religious Freedom? and whe­ther a man of words ever did his Country good, without his deed ac­cordingly? and whether the People can be safe, unless all their Pro­mises are fulfilled?

3. Whether it be not great oppression (upon the miscarriage of some people) for them that are innocent to be deprived of their promised Liberty, and their bodies imprisoned, their houses searched, by the botches, boyls and scum of a Commonwealth, as their rude debauch­ed behaviour, by their swearing and damming, and taking away mens Arms, Money, Plate, &c. without Licence, and afterwards take a sum of Money from some third person, to release him, do not prove them to be a company of unrighteous Caterpillers? and whether this oppression and unrighteousness be not countenanced, to have an Act of Oblivion granted particularly to such rude fellows, to obstruct a course of Law, and to disenable the loyal Subjects of the King to right them­selves (for those injuries done them) according to Law? and whether such practices do make the People happy and safe?

4. Whether it be not lawful, and encouraged by the Promise of the King, for all the People (especially all those who have had many good things promised them, but as yet no good deeds done them) to joyn in an Association, and not any more to suffer such fellows, under any pretence whatsoever, to do the like, but to stand upon their guards in their own houses respectively, and keep them out? And whether this be not warranted by the common Law-books? and whether Judge Cook was not mistaken to say they might do so, and that it was [Page 6] no Murder if the housekeeper did kill any such attempters? Whether now, as the case stands, the People can be safe, if they do not so asso­ciate? and whether such an Association will not make the King more safe than all that hath been done since his coming to his Throne?

5. Whether it be not Treason for the People to confess the unrigh­teousness and sin of the Governours and Nobles of a Nation, in their prayers, and use Daniel's words, (viz.) We, our Kings, our Princes, and our Fathers have sinned, and conclude with one of the Respon­sials in the Common-Prayer-Book, Lord have mercy on them? and whether the People can be safe and avoid the Judgment of Heaven, if they do not so confess their sin, and pray for them? or else how shall the Curse that's upon them depart? Dan. 9. 8, 11, 12, 13, 14.

3ly. Since sin and unrighteousn [...]ss aboundeth, and the People bound to make Confession to God;

1. Whether it be safe for King and Subject, to reade the Prayers made by the Church of England, when the Spirit of God in the Go­spel bids them pray with the Spirit and understanding, And the Ca­nons of the Church commands them to read Prayer; and the Apostle saith, Rom. 8. 26. We know not what to pray for as we ought without the Spirits help; and yet these superstitious Priests will undertake to teach all the People of God to reade Prayer, contrary to the Com­mand in the Gospel and the help of the holy Ghost, and so stifle a gift of Prayer, and grieve the holy Spirit? And whether God will re­gard such Readers, that so oppose him, or give them a return, that so contradict him? Or, if it can be in the least thought, that a Spirit of Holiness and Sanctification can ever rest and be in men that delight in Prophaness, Idolatry and Superstition? and whether such Prayer-men and their Prayers, be ought else unto the Lord but (yellings and howlings of Dogs, Lions, and Bears) Abomination? Jer. 51. 38. Prov. 25. 8. and 21. 27. Isa. 1. 11. To what purpose then is the multitude of your Sacrifices? [such Prayers] I am weary of your Abo­minations. And whether in a short time God will not be angry and a weary of these Prayer-men, and their Prayers also?

2. Whether it be safe for either King or Subject to believe there is any other spirit in these Priests and Sursingle-men, than was in the Pro­phets [Page 7] of King Ahab, when Zedekiah the son of Chenaanah went near and smote Micaiah on the cheek, 1 King. 22. 24. and do ma­nage their spirit as well, and would be smiting all the honest Presby­ters and others, termed Phanaticks, that preach the Gospel, elegant­ly, spiritually and powerfully in the Nation, by getting power from the King to put those poor men into Prison, and feed them there with bread and water of affliction, that their Ignorance might not be dis­covered, nor their Peace disturbed? 1 King. 22. 27. And whether there be any other zeal in these fellows, than was in the Priests of Baal and Prophets afore▪ mentioned, who were only zealous in Persecution, Falshood and Lyes? And whether those that Christ sends to preach the Gospel do resolve the fall of Adam, as one Mr. Garret, a learned man in holy Orders did, to be only a wind that blew him down from the wall where he was set to dry; Or, as another said that was in holy Orders also, That God forbad the Jews to eat Swines fl [...]sh, and Adam killed a Pig and ate it, and that was the forbidden fruit: Or as one Dr. Powry of Bishopsgate, not long since, on a Collection-day, affirmed, that Ministers of the Gospel must be comely handsome men? And whether these be not all lyars, and do erre, not knowing the Truth, when the Text saith, Acts 10. 34. God is no respecter of persons, and Luke 20. 21. I know thou art just, and accepts no mans person; and Gal. 2. 6. the same? And whether a Minister receive from Christ a spirit of prophaness, as in Dr. Reeve Dean of Windsor, not long since in Pauls Churchyard at the three Crowns, being moved about a Pe­tition, answered▪ Gods-wounds he could do no more than he could, but By God he would do what he could? And in like manner the reverend Bishop Perce, coming into a Barbors-shop where one Mr. Maker­ness was a trimming, the said Makerness offered him his seat, with some such complement as this; He was glad to see his Lordship in good health. Quoth the Bishop, dost thou know me? Yes, said Mr. Markerness, you are the Reverend Father in God, Lord Bishop of Bath and Wells. What's thy name, quoth the Bishop? my name is Makerness. The Bishop presently swares, Godswounds, a Pillar of the Church! and whether, if God give not these men repentance, they are not like to go to Ahabs and Baals Prophets, being of so like a spi­rit, and so near affinity in their works?

3. Whether it be not safe for King and Subjects, to keep off and avoid all Ecclesiastical Imposition, since the Puritan Spirit is so increa­sed, that for one Puritan in the year 1640, there is now ten Phana­ticks? [Page 8] and whether the breaking this ten-fold cord will not break all in pieces?

4. Whether it be not safe for King and Subject, to nip the Pride and Covetousness of these Ecclesiastical men in the Bud, lest by their Pride and Insolency they swell so high, as to renew our Distractions, and bring all into Blood again?

5. Whether there be such a spirit in King, Church, or State, to give a quiet Responsial, and not to thirst after the Blood of him and them, that wish both King and Subject peace and safety, will be great cause of joy to him and them? otherwise, Whether it be Treason, to con­clude with David's Prayer in Psal. 43. 1. Judge me, O God, and plead my Cause against an ungodly Nation, and deliver me from the deceit­full and unjust men▪ &c.