A brief Relation, containing an Abreviation of the Arguments, urged by the late Protector, against the Government of this Nation by a King or Single Person.
The Consideration of the Obstruction that probably this true Relation will meet with all from fawning Courtiers and Deceived Englishmen, had almost prevented its prosecution; but remembring that nought but the awaking of my dear slumbering Country-men from that drousey state, that for some dayes they have seem'd to lye in, which if persisted in, will give too great an opportunity to the common Enemy to effect his will on us all; I was encouraged to proceed, trusting in the Lord, who has and will deliver the Innocent from all the Calumnious aspersions of Court Parasites. And therefore without any other Apologie, I shall proceed to the Arguments themselves, which I shall deliver if not in the absolute terms, yet in the genuine sense.
IMprimis, Because its possible, yea and more than ordinarily probable, that a single person in a short time will work over his Council to his own will, though illegall; either in conferring places of Honour and profit on them and their friends, or else in terrifying them by threats.
2 Because that a single person being raised to such a state, is subject to wax wanton and so forget, or rather neglect the Commonalty, in providing for a few that will be at his beck, ready to fulfill his pleasure.
3 Because that notwithstanding for a time, he may carry matters faire, and do some good things, Jehu like, untill he has gotten an interest in the affections of the people, but then forgetting or rather slighting what he formerly pretended too, instead of countenancing of Justice and endeavouring Reformation, its possible he may become a favourer of iniquity; nay, said he, a settler of a Court, or nurserie of Whores, Rogues, Bawds and such like persons, as was evidently seen in former dayes at Whitehall.
4 Because if he cannot accomplish his designe on his Coun [...]il, but they discover his wickednesses and abominations, and oppose him (on the behalf of their Countrey) he will be ready [...]nd apt secretly to confederate and make Leagues with other [...]rinces, and so let in a Forraign enemy, rather than be kept [...]ithin the bounds of Law and Justice, as we have seen in the (late) King, who has brought in Irish and Scots, and also sent [Page] Letters-pattents with letters of Credence to three Forraigne princes, By Doctor Duck, Major Boswell. inviting them to come into England.
5 Because if the chief Governour, King or Single person should become an Ideot, then nought but a continuall charge (upon the good people) could be expected, even robing them of their substance, untill they are made so poore, as not to be able to oppose an enemy, which so soon as understood will sufficiently encourage a Forraign enemy, to make an invasion upon us.
6 Because the Government by one single person, is far more chargeable to the people, which in the laying aside of, the people will soon become sensible by the lessening of their charge: for that Revenue (which was to uphold one man, and spent in voluptuousnesse by him) being brought into the publique Treasury, will help to defray much of the charge that otherwise must fall on the people; nay, said he, whosoever shall go about to settle the Government in one person, will make themselves so odious, that the people will be ready to knock them ot'head; for when once the Family of the Stuarts is gone, if you establish one man in the government, in a little time he will become master of the Nations Treasure, and at his first coming to the place will most eagerly desire moneys, to buy this bauble for one, and that toy for an other; and after a little while, when he hath tasted the sweetness and deliciousnesse thereof, will to maintain the same become a purchaser of lands with the peoples moneys, untill they are become so poore that they shall be necessitated to be his Vassals, and consequently Slaves for ever; for as the first doth, so a second, and third will doe after him, untill the good people be utterly undone.
7 Because the Government being placed in one person, he will be subject to judge of himself as above law, and without the reach of any law, and by Violence, Tyrannize over whom he pleases, commanding one man to prison, and moneys from another, and possibly both money and liberty from a third▪ &c. the refusing of which arbitrary commands or actions wil [...] expose men to his mercy, which will be no lesse than cruelty.
8 Because that the abominations and wickedness of a Cour [...] has been, and (is justly feared) will be, so great that both the person himself and his Council about him will alwaies (f [...] to uphold their voluptuousness) be ready to erect new Monopolies, granting pattents to his Lords, &c. to get money [Page 5] from the people, for to maintain their pompe and pride, and thereby keep the people in such servitude, that in a little time, they will be out of a capacity to gain justice on any of the Courtiers: And then the Citizen must wait for his money, when his commodity is sold, and scarce dare ask, and not dare arrest a Courtier for what he oweth, for fear of his Master. And the Country mans hedges will be broken down, his Corn trampled on, and spoiled, or eaten by the game, and to complain of which, will be accounted a crime little less than Treason.
These and such [...]re the things you must expect (said he) if you set up one Single person, and who would be so mad, God having so signally witnessed against the King and House of Lords: The much blood that hath been shed, and the vast treasure expended, and the Controversie decided on our parts, witnesseth aloud against it. Further, said he, I am confident that who ever they be, that shall go about to settle a Court in this Nation, God will destroy and bring to nought, and Confusion will be to them and their posterity, and (said he) if ever I should go about any such thing, I desire God would never blesse me nor mine.
He farther declared, That God had born witnesse against the Parliament, for that they were intending to make peace with the late King, and to settle him, telling some members of the then Parliament and army, when they spake of settling the Government in one single person that God would destroy them, some for going about to settle iniquity by a law, and others for not protesting against them, and for not declaring their protest to the good people of England: and thus now gentle reader thou hast the substance of some of the reasons, urged by the late Lord Protector against Monarchy, though suddenly he leapt into the same himself, but now it may be said, these reasons are not sufficient to prove the same, whether they are or not, I shall not now dispute, but that it may appeare to be probable, I present these ensuing Queries.
Upon the whole I Querie, whether any man upon rational grounds can expect, that the present Protector or single person (pretending to Government,) should be more honest righteous and just than his deceased Father was?
But more particularly upon the Arguments.
1 I would Querie, first, Whether the late Protector did not worke over his Council to some things illegal.
2 Whether Kings formerly and the Protector lately did not wax wonton, and providing for some few of their creatures neglect the Commonalty?
3 Whether, our late experience of a single Person cannot testifie, that though for a small time, he seemed to favour honest men and things, yet when he thought himself seated, whether I say, he did not then slight both them and it, and become a favourer of the contrary? And whether our late Court did not shew more growth and increase of Rogues, Bauds and Whores, than all the time of our Government by a Common-Wealth.
4 Whether a Confederacy has not been made abroad with our secret enemies at home, that so a single person might the better suppresse those that see the wickednesse of his designes.
5 Whether the single person now pretending to Government, though the son of a subtile man, be a wise man? fit to dispose of Common-Wealth treasure.
6 Whether the good people of this Nation be not very sensible of the expensiveness extroardinary of a single person more than of a Common-Wealth? and whether they do not finde a want of that vast treasure expended upon Baubles, Toyes, and triffling gugaes? such as we of late have had two much cause to speak of. And whether the [Page 7] cause of the peoples poverty, has not been by means of purchasing lands to the Family of the late Protector, as well as High- Spaniola business?
7 Whether the late person set up, did not judge himself above law? and whether he did not Tyranize over mens persons, restraining both them and their liberty? and whether the mercy he has pretended to in the execution thereof has not been very cruelty?
8 Whether the late single person to uphold his, and his Courtiers voluptuousness, has not been ready to uphold what monopolies he found on foot, and likewise to devise new wayes to the same purpose. and whether the Citizen has not had experience of Court payment, and the Country man (though sad) of the spoyling of his fences, destroying his crop, by them that belong to the Court, and that, they please to call their game? And if these be the beginnings what will the end be; and therefore for a closure I must say; what shall we say or do mare then the King Protector has said and done.
Now to conclude, I humbly present to consideration, whether upon a diligent serious weighing of the present action and past managment of State affairs, of some being Lawyers, &c. (raised from a low estate to sit in Council) and become great favourites at Court, it may not be found and clearly seen, that they have a designe for to bring in Charles Stuart? For if first they bring in a single person and grant that, the next dispute will be, whether the one family or the other has most right: and who have most interest Charls or Richard, I think asketh no long time to answer. Farther I would add, whether it be not more likely to attain to the practice of that golden rule, do as you would be done too, under the Government of a Common Wealth, in which law-makers are liable to be judged by the law made, rather than under a Monarchical Government; where or in which one if setled [Page 8] is above law and accountable to none? who though never so wicked and unjust cannot be removed but by an extraordinary providence, as was the case of the late King and Protector.
Now whereas it is indeavored by some Court parasites to insinuate into the people, that that which the Common Wealth party aimes at, is an involving of the Nations in blood and confusion; (I would meekly tender. Whether their deportments and behaviour under the almost insupportable burden of the Tyrany of late times, (in which their rights and liberties have lain bleeding) hath given any just cause of such suspition? Or rather, whether their patience has not manifested, their hope hath been, and still is in God, from whom, by the means of a lawfull free Parliament they only expect deliverance;) be not a vindication sufficient only not from what is now suggested against them, Which Letter Whaley foolishly shewed the K [...]ng. but also, from that old brand that the late Protector in a letter to the late King, while at Hampton Court gave them (viz.) Levellers, and that their work would be to kill the King and levie all mens estates, by which m [...]nes he effected his end (viz) an incensing of the people and the other part of the Army against them, which when he had done, he easily carried on his wicked designes, which since has come to publick view, for a diliverance from which are the hearty prayers of all true English-men.