THE ANTIQUITIES OF PALMYRA.

Containing the HISTORY OF THE CITY, and its EMPERORS, From its Foundation to the Present Time.

WITH An APPENDIX of Critical Observations on the Names, Religion, and Government of the Country.

AND A COMMENTARY on the Inscriptions lately found there.

LONDON, Printed for S. Smith and B. Walford, Printers to the Royal Sociey, at the Princes-Arms in St. Paul's Church-Yard. 1696.

MVNIFICENTIA REGIA. 1715

GEORGIVS D. G. MAG. BR. FR. ET. HIB. REX F.D.

SOCIETATI REGIAE

In Collegio Greshamensi
Supremo Numini, & Laboranti Naturae
Horas utilissimè impendenti,
Verae Philosophiae instauratrici,
Mathematum, & politioris Litteraturae
Arbitrae, & Sequestrae,
Eruditi orbis Delicijs,
Quam ambierunt Princip [...]um Maximi,
Venerantur, quotquot Musis litarunt
Farraginem hanc
RERUM PALMYRENARUM
[...] exaratam
Summo, quo decet, cultu, & observantiâ
Lubens merito more majorum,
D.D.D.C.Q.
AB. SELLERUS.

THE PREFACE.

THE Learned World having been for some years in ex­pectation of a Description of the Antiquities of Palmyra from some accurate Traveller, whose Curiosity might prompt him to visit those Desarts, that he might enrich Eu­rope with the Rarities of that remote Province of the East, of which the World had had but a very obscure, if any, ac­count; some worthy English Mer­chants, pursuant to the Dictates of that nobler Genius, that actuates the gene­rous Members of the Levant Company, overlookt all the Difficulties and Ha­zards, that accompany such an Enter­prize, and attempted the Discovery. And though the first Essay was not crown'd with so good Success, as it de­serv'd, through the Treachery and Base­ness of the Arab Prince, who at that [Page]time govern'd the Country; the second Voyage was perform'd to the great Sa­tisfaction of Mankind, and 'tis to their Munificence, that we owe those Jour­nals, which the Royal Society hath late­ly publisht. Nor is this the only In­stance, wherein those eminent Mer­chants have been Benefactors to the Commonwealth of Letters; their Com­pany consisting of Men of good Birth, and gentile Education, of liberal For­tunes, and as large Minds; and may their Success in their worldly Affairs be suited to their great Deserts, may they always flourish, and always be in a ca­pacity to do worthy Actions.

To the jealous Arabs the Underta­king seem'd ridiculous, that prudent Men should contract a great Expence only to transcribe a few imperfect In­scriptions, and take a view of old Ru­ines, and perhaps there are some Cen­sors who live nearer than the Desarts of Tadhmur, who are of the same opinion; but the Men of Judgment in all Ages have entertained different Sentiments, and Providence seems to have been par­ticularly concern'd in the Preservation [Page]of many Fragments of Antique Litte­rature. When L. 2. p. 121. Strabo treats of Olyn­thus, and other Cities of Greece, which had been utterly destroy'd before his time, insomuch as whosoever travel'd those parts, might justly question whither ever those places had been inhabited; he sub­joins, that the Curious and Inquisitive were pleas'd to visit those Ruines, being desirous to see the Theatres, where so many noble Actions had been perform'd, and to pay Homage to the Ashes of those Illustrious Persons, who lay there buried: (And what a Spirit of Emulation does it raise in every generous Soul to prompt him to sublime Actions, when he views the Tombs, or hears the Story of the Heroes of former Ages?) And in the days of In Cha­ront. Lucian, when many Cities had been swallowed up of Earthquakes, or bu­ried in the Sea, tho' Rivers themselves had been lost, and absorpt, that they ne­ver more appear'd, yet the Tomb of Ina­chus was preserv'd at Argos, a Memori­al of the Atchievements of that first King of the Morea.

Neither Strabo, nor Mela, take any notice of Palmyra, nor (which is more to be admired) many of the Arabian [Page]Geographers, neither Alferganus, nor the Geographer commonly called the Nubian, neither Nasser Eddin nor Ʋ ­lug Beig, set out by our Learned Mr. Greaves; its Situation was very remote from both Rome and Athens, in the midst of vast Desarts, which deter'd the curious Traveller; and its Empire, and Glory were so short-lived, that we can­not expect a large Description of its State and Fortunes from the ancient Writers. But such Memorials, as ei­ther they, or the later Historians have afforded, I have taken care to digest into method, and to offer them to the present Age. Had we Domninus the Historian of Antioch, who lived in the Neighbourhood, or Philostratus of A­thens, or Nicostratus of Trebizond, who wrote the History of those times, par­ticularly the Affairs of the East, it would have been no difficult Province to have given a more perfect account of that Country; or had we but that one Oration of the most accurate Lon­ginus, which he wrote in praise of O­daenathus, that no doubt would have furnisht a sufficient stock of Materials toward the writing the Life of that [Page]Great Man; but these are Blessings lost to the World, and, I fear, past retrie­ving.

It may look like a bold, and daring Undertaking, to adventure to build a Large Structure with so few Materials; but I have been as careful in my ac­counts, as I was qualified to be, and ac­cording to my Understanding have con­fin'd my self to the strict Rules of Truth, and exactly followed my Vou­chers, (whom for that reason I have ci­ted in the Margin;) for he, who pre­tends to write History without Autho­rities, may be said to be Author of a Romance, or a Collector of Dreams, but can never be allowed to be a good Historian. And if I have been, as I take it for granted, mistaken in any of my Conjectures, (as I have frequently taken that liberty, but no where, that I know of, without some grounds for my so do­ing) it is no wonder, and will be easily pardoned, when 'tis consider'd, that e­ven the Historians of that Country, and of the early Ages, knew not all the particulars of the Palmyrene Affairs; that Theodorit himself the Bishop of Cy­rus [Page]in Cyrrhestica, a Neighbouring Pro­vince, in less than two hundred years after the Reign of Odaenathus, is so mi­staken, as to affirm, that Zenobia was constituted the Toparch of Syria, and Phoenicia by the Persians, after they had routed the Romans, and that he, who digs in a dark Mine, may be al­lowed a little failure in his Work; and I shall thank any Learned Man, who shall correct my Errors, and set the Hi­story in a better light.

I have dealt with my Reader, as I love to be treated my self, having been always pleased with a full account of whatever is material on any subject, when profestly handled; and I have gi­ven my Authorities in the Margin, not to make a show of much acquaintance with Books, but to inform the Reader that I have not imposed on him, and to direct him where he may satisfy him­self, if he doubts. I have used the words Palmyra and Tadhmur promiscuously, because, though the new name, whither imposed by a Conqueror, or given for any other reason, prevail'd among the Greeks and Romans, yet the old Syriac [Page]name kept its Interest among the Na­tives, and has at this day recover'd an entire Possession, as some other neigh­bouring Cities in that Country have done: So Caesarea in Palestine is at pre­sent call'd, as of old, Paneas; and Petra in Arabia, is now named Bosra, to omit other Instances. For, as Lib. 14. c. 8. Seleu­cus Nicator urbes con­struxit multis opibus firmas, & viribus, qua­rum ad praesens plere­que licet Graecis nomi­nibus appellentur, quae iisdem ad arbitrium im­posita sunt conditoris, primogenita tamen no­mina non amittunt, quae ex Assyriâ linguâ insti­tutores veteres indide­runt. Am­mianus Marcellinus has well observ'd, When Seleucus Ni­cator rebuilt many old Cities in Syria, (among whom we may reckon Palmyra) and gave them Strength and Ri­ches, tho' many of them are still called by the Greek Names, which their Founder Seleucus gave them; yet they did at the same time among the Natives retain their old Syrian Appellations, which their first Founders imposed. (Hence came it, that the new name of Adrianople given to Palmyra, was in a little time worn out; and tho' the Greeks called the Island of Corsica Diod. Sic. l. 5. p. 205. Cyrnus, the Natives still main­tain'd the Interest of the true name, and it continues to this day; Steph. [...]. and tho' He­raclea was for a while called Plistarchia, in time it asserted its ancient Right, and [Page]was called as formerly, Heraclea.) And I heartily wish, that the Learned Men, who have visited those Oriental Coun­tries had furnisht themselves with In­struments, and spent some time in tak­ing the exact Longitudes and Latitudes of the several Cities.

In the Chronological Accounts, I have followed the commonly receiv'd Epo­chas, and accordingly fixt my Series of Times, without entring into an over­nice Examination of particular Disputes in Chronology, which was not so con­sonant to my present Subject, having fixt the year of the Creation according to the Computation of our most Learn­ed Arch-bishop Ʋsher. I have freely used the names of the Heathen Gods, (tho' for the most part with a distin­guishing Epithet;) and besides, the ne­cessity of my Subject, which obliged me to it, I might plead the usual practise in other Languages, that the Fathers did the same; and some of the antient Chri­stians, who went larger lengths than I ever durst, witness that Epitaph in Gru­ter 1050. , (Jovis optimi maximi beneficio hic in spe resurrectionis quiescit;) nor can I be perswaded, that such Studies are dis­agreeable [Page]to my Profession, (if any pas­sage of that kind appears in the History, I here renounce it, and may it be, as if it had never been said or written) while the Learned Synesius hath publisht the Life of Typhon, and Osiris, St. Ambrose, (as 'tis said) and Palladius, the History of the Brachmanes, and Nonnus, besides his Paraphrase upon St. John, was the Author of the Dionysiaca. Tho', after all, I must profess, I expect to be treat­ed rudely by some sowre Criticks; but having no private design in these Pa­pers, I shall please my self to be corrected by a Man of Sense and Temper, and for the rest of the Tribe, they are be­neath Consideration; it must be acknow­ledg'd, that a Treatise of this kind ought to have been written in the Learned Language, (as probably it may be here­after;) but it was requisite to publish the Commentary in the same Language with the Text, and that the Journals having been set forth in English, the Hi­story ought to be written in the same Tongue; and had not a good part of my Papers, when finisht, been unhappily lost past retrieving, my Genius also nausea­ting the Drudgery of doing the same [Page]thing over again, I might perhaps have managed the Subject with more Accu­racy. P. 258. I have affirmed, that the Saturns and Jupiters of the Heathens were born after the days of Job and of Joshua, and herein I have followed the Fathers, par­ticularly Theophilus of Antioch, (an ex­cellent Chronologist, and who by that unanswerable Argument hath ruined all that was then said for the Eternity of the World, and of the Heathen Gods) who in one place of his excellent Work a­gainst Autolycus, (which for this reason is justly stiled by Lactantius, liber de temporibus) affirms, L. 2. p. 58. that Saturn, Ju­piter, Neptune, and Pluto, were much younger than the Creation; in a second, L. 3. p. 258. that Jupiter was much younger than Moses, and the Law; but more expresly in a third, P. 282. that Cronus and Belus, i. e. Saturn, as Thallus says in his History, lived but 322 years before the Trojan War; whereas Moses lived 630 years before that famous Epocha. And the Chronologer Petavius proves, that when Saturn fled into Italy, driven out by his Son Jupiter, Ehud was then a Judge in Israel, about the year 1330 before Christ; and that from the time of Ja­nus, [Page]to whom Saturn fled, to Aeneas, the whole was not 200 years.

The Arabick Authors, as well as the common People of the Country, are to this day possest with the Opinion, that Tadmur was built by Solomon, and that by the help of Spirits, as was also Baal­bec, (says Benjamin Tudelensis) the su­perstitious Jews and Arabs thinking it impossible that Art should perfect a stu­pendous Building without the assistance of a familiar. If the City were de­stroy'd by Nebuchadnezzar, before he laid siege to Jerusalem, as John Malela expresly affirms, and in this account we may give him Credit, because he was of that Country, and may be presum'd, not to be ignorant of the Affairs of Sy­ria) then it is not improbable, that Seleu­cus Nicator, the Founder of the Syrian Empire, rebuilt Tadhmur, as he did ma­ny other Cities; and that then, in ho­nour to him, and compliance with both their Benefactor and Conqueror; they dated their publick Writings from the first year of his Empire, the aera Seleu­cidarum, as it is commonly stiled. The Si­tuation of the City fitted it for a publick Mart, and the Cities Alalis, Sura, Ptol. l. 5. c. 15. and [Page] Alamata, being parts of Palmyrene, and built on the Banks of the Euphrates, may be presumed the Ports, where they brought their Goods, either exported, or imported on that noble River, the Cities being subject to the Re-publick. Of what Bigness, and Capacity for car­riage the River that did run by its Walls was, we know not, it having been ma­ny years since absorpt. That there ran a River there in Ptolemy's time, the Geogragrapher affirms expresly, that many other Rivers have been lost in Earthquakes, to which the Eastern Regions are very subject, no Man doubts; and some which yet continue to run, are soon buried: L. 1. c. 13. Mela avers, that a great River arises near Corycus in Cilicia; and having made a great noise, is immedi­ately swallow'd, and disappears; and the River that runs by Aleppo, is in a few hours afterward buried in the Sands.

When the Romans began to enlarge their Conquests in Syria, I question not but Palmyra was under the Jurisdiction of the Arabs; for when Pompey the Great, after the Death of the famous Mithra­dates, marcht against Aretas the King of the Arabs, ( Appian calls him King of [Page]the Nabataean Arabs) ann. V. C. 690. ante Christum 63. his Kingdom reacht from the River Euphrates to the Red Sea, says Dio, L. 36. (in which compass Pal­myra must be included;) this Aretas was doubtless one of the Al-Hariths of the Arabians, who were Kings of Gessan, and in later Ages Lords of Taah­mur. After which time, I believe, it acknowledg'd the Roman Power, but was govern'd by its own Laws, having under its immediate Jurisdiction, be­sides the three Cities on the River al­ready mentioned, twelve more in the Inland of Syria. When Trajan made his glorious Expedition into Persia, I con­jecture, Palmyra was a Sufferer in the common Calamity of that Country, for Pliny says it was sometime in the Roman, at others in the Parthian In­terest, or else it would not have need­ed Hadrian's assistance to rebuild, and beautify it; while other Cities tasted of Trajan's Bounty, for from Trajan's Expedition (in the 8th year of his Reign, of Christ 105.) the Inhabi­tants of Bozra and Petra, dated their Writings, says the Author of the A­lexandrian [Page]Chronicle: L. 3. p. 105. and Zosimus af­firms, that at Zaragardia, not far from the Euphrates on the Persian side, in his time there stood a noble Throne built of stone, which the Natives called Tra­jan's Throne; erected, I doubt not, in memory of his illustrious Atchieve­ments in that Country. But whate­ver Palmyra might have suffered un­der Trajan, was repair'd by his Suc­cessor, who gave the City his own name, and they in Gratitude made Vows for his Recovery; not in the last, the 19th of his Reign, as thro' haste is said, F. 35, 36. (he reigned almost 22 years;) but in the seventeenth, from which Sickness he recover'd to dye afterwards in greater torment, (and this I mention here, that I may correct the Mistake in the History:) To this City Septimius Severus may also be presumed a Benefactor, (to whom be­fore his famous Expedition against the Parthians, Spart. vit. Septim. p. 67. when he routed Niger, with whom the Arabs, Parthians, and the Inhabitants of Adiabene, join'd their Forces) the Re-publick gave their as­sistance against the Allies of the Em­pire, [Page]and adopted his name into their most eminent Families; after which time, till the Reign of Zenobia, I take them to have been in confederacy with, and subject to the Emperors; for they assisted both Alexander Se­verus and Gordian, in their Expediti­ons into the East against the Persians, as the Inscriptions testify; only it looks probable, that upon the Captivity of Valerian, the Senate for a while dis­sembled their Interests, and acknow­ledg'd the Power of Sapores. In the Battel at Immae, where Zenobia was routed, S. Hierom affirms, that Pom­peianus the Frank settled at Antioch, but the Family was unquestionably fixt in that Country long before; Capitol. Marcus. for when Marcus the Philosopher un­dertook the German War, he married his Daughter to Claudius Pompeianus, who was of Antioch. This also I mention to correct another Mistake. After the Captivity of Zenobia, the City was a Spectacle of pity; but be­ing a necessary Frontier, was repair'd, and in Dioclesian's time was the Seat of the Governor of the Province. In [Page]the days of Constantius, the Inhabi­tants were noted, as now, for great Robbers, P. 8. says the old Geographer, set out by Gothofred, and govern'd by Wo­men; but that I take for granted is an Error, as if, when Zenobia had be­gun to wield a Scepter, none but her own Sex in that Country durst pre­tend to command. Malel. part 2. p. 39. Theodosius the Great divided Libanesia from the Sea­coast of Phoenicia, and made it a di­stinct Province, Emesa being the Me­tropolis, under whose Jurisdiction Pal­myra was put, and so continued, when the Followers of Mahomet had made themselves Masters of that Country, and for many Centuries after; for in A­bulfedas's time, above 1300 after Christ, Tadhmur acknowledg'd Hems, ( Eme­sa) its Metropolis, and probably it was so after his time. In the Reign of the same Theodosius, (if P. 28. ed. Gron. Ethicus, or who­ever goes under that name, lived in those days) or before (for St. Hierome is said to have translated him) Palmy­ra is reckoned among the famous Towns of the East; as it is also by P. 8. Julius Honorius, who lived before [Page] Theodoric; for Cassiodore mentions him, ( Palmira damascus, read Palmyra, Da­mascus) and the Author of the Alexan­drian Chronicon among the famous Cities of the fourth Climate, reckons Palmyra, with Apamea, Emesa, &c. in Caele Syria. In Justinian's time it be­came the Residence of the Governor of the East, and subject to the Con­stantinopolitan Empire, but 'tis proba­ble did not continue long in that State; for about the year of Christ 640. when Heraclius was Emperor, Jaba­lah the Son of Al Iham was King of Gassan, and Lord of Tadhmur, (perhaps a Tributary to Heraclius) who being overcome by Omar the Caliph, one of Mahomet's Successors; submitted, and turn'd Mahometan; but, repenting, he afterward went to Constantinople, Pococ. not. in Specim. hist. Ar. p. 77, 136. and became a Christian; and at this time, I believe, Mahometanism settled it self at Tadhmur, the Tribe of Gassan being before those days Christian.

I shall not particularly undertake to demonstrate the Usefulness of Coins and Inscriptions, the Learned World [Page]hath been already fully convinc'd of that truth; how many difficult, and obscure Passages in Chronology have been set in their due light, how ma­ny Series of Kings have been regular­ly deduc't, what Rites and Customs both sacred and civil have been by those helps discover'd, needs no fur­ther proof; though were there no­thing, else at Palmyra to be seen, but the noble Ruines of the Temples and Palaces, built according to the best and boldest Rules of the ancient Ar­chitecture, I should think a Journey thither on that Errand alone worth the Undertaking. And though the oldest of the Palmyrene Inscriptions is a hundred years younger than our bles­sed Saviour's Incarnation (as I have made appear in the Commentary) yet they are not so contemptible as some have imagin'd, but afford us some Memorials of those times, which no where else occur. And by the same Argument, (the use of the Greek Ε, which appears not till about Domi­tian's time) by which I postpone the oldest Inscription at Tadhmur a hun­dred [Page]years, may we prove the Spuri­ousness of that Table preserv'd at Rome, which is reported to contain the very Title, which by Pilate's Order was affixt to the Cross of our Lord, for therein [...] is written with the same sort of Ε.

It must be confest, that in the Pal­myrene Inscriptions are some peculiar words, which occur not in the Lexica, as [...], &c.) of which sort there are more in other old Mar­bles; nor is it any wonder, that in a remote part of Syria, where a different Language was spoken, Pric. in Apul. Apolog. p. 67. De foedere Hiera­pytniorum, & Priansens. sciunt doctiores usque­quo huc progredi licet, scripta hoc genus non in­tra Lexicorum septa co­ercenda: satis (que) de In­terpretis fide, ac judicio constare, qui sciet, ubi legem sequi, ubi dare o­porteat. the Greek should not be so pure, as at Athens; and in such cases a Critick is left to his own Judg­ment: nor is it a Disrepu­tation to his Fidelity, or acumen, if he happen to wander, where he has no Guide.

The Usefulness of the Journals and History will never be controverted, [Page]when 'tis consider'd, that they give us the account of a Country, hard­ly before known to the present Age, and of many Rites and Cermonies, which the European World counts ri­diculous, but will appear very ancient and defensible; for no Nation under Heaven hath been so tenacious of old Usages, as the Orientals. Of which I shall give a few instances.

That the Arabs should suspect the Europeans, that in those Ruines, a­mong so many Sepulchres, they should seek for Treasures, is no wonder to me, since it was very usual under the Foundations of all magnificent Stru­ctures to bury great Sums of Mo­ney, probably that the Coin, when the Building was ruinous, might discover the Founder, Talismans also being set up in several places to direct the cu­rious Enquirer. Thus Jamblic. ap. Phot. cod. 94. Rhodanes found a great quantity of Gold by the Di­rections of a Pillar, upon which was pourtrayed a Lyon; and a like Story is related in the Life of Aesop: And in David's Tomb, Josephus says, the [Page]High-Priest Hyrcanus found a vast Treasure; but the Author of the P. 364. Alexandrian Chronicle avers, that it was Hezekiah, who first open'd the Tomb to show the Riches of his An­cestors to the King of Babylon's Am­bassadors, and that for profaning the Ashes of his Fathers, God devoted his Posterity to Captivity.

That they should account a young Camel drest a noble Feast, will cease to be a Subject of wonder or diver­sion, when we remember, that Custom is the Judge of good or coarse Meats, that every Nation, even in the civiliz'd parts of Europe, differ in their Noti­ons of preferable Dishes, and that a Treat of the best things the Country affords ought to be reckon'd a Feast. To which we may add, that their An­cestors lived on the same fare; that L. 16. p. 767. Strabo calls the Arabs of his time Camel-eaters; that Adv. Jo­vin. l. 2. c. 6. St. Hierome avers, that the Arabs and Saracens, and all other the barbarous Inhabitants of the Desart, lived upon the Milk and Flesh [Page]of their Camels, (and so says Abulfa­rajus) that both Hist. a­nim. l. 6. c. 26. Aristotle and 11. 41. Pliny reckon the Flesh, and the Milk of Camels, not only among the whole­some, but among delicious Meats; and that In Clio. Herodotus affirms, that the Persians of quality on their Birth­days, (which was a solemn Festival among them) among other Dishes, treated their Friends with a whole Oxe, and a whole Camel drest; that Apud. A­then. l. 4. Antiphanes says, that a Camel serv'd up hot was a Feast for a King; and that the Emperor Lamprid. p. 108. Elagabalus (who was a Native of that part of Syria, where the Emir, who treated the Eng­lish Merchants, lived) in imitation of Apicius (who was no contemptible Judge of luxurious Eating, having spent a fair Estate in the Gratifica­tions of his Palate, and being since his Death quoted as an Author for all the Varieties of the old Cookery) used to eat the feet of Camels, as an extraordinary Dish; and when he would appear magnificent, caused to be brought in at Supper entire [Page]Camels for the Service of his Friends.

Pilaw (or Rice) is another Dish a­mong the Arabs, as also among the Persians, Indians and Turks, and so it was of old, says Lib. 15. Strabo. The Arabs of this Age live as their Ancestors, who wandred up and down with their Families, and Cattel, and fixt for a while, where-ever they found Water for themselves, and Grass, for their Herds; their Tents are now, as of old, made of Camels Hair, (the Camel is in truth the most useful of Animals to them; the Flesh is their Meat, the Milk their Drink, their Tents are made of their Hair, their Carriage is upon Camels, and their Riches a numerous Herd of them) they marry as many Wives as they are able to maintain; Am. Mar­cellin. l. 23. c. 6. generally hate Drunkenness, and avoid it as the Plague; never make Water standing, nor ease nature, but in a place of great Privacy; and those, who are military Men, sit arm'd at the Table, and never put off their Scimitars till [Page]they go to bed; all which Customs Ammianus observ'd were practis'd a­mong the old Inhabitants of those Countries. They measure their Jour­nies, not by leagues or miles, but by hours and days, as the old Syrians did; impaleing is a Punishment usu­al to this day, and the Criminal is forc't to carry his Stake to the place of Execution, as the Person to be cru­cified anciently carried his Cross. The Custom of putting the whole Family to Death for the Offence of the Chief of it, (of notorious and hainous, as the Murder of their Prince, or the like) is not quite difus'd to this day in Persia; and as Valerian, and o­thers were flead alive, so was Marc Antonio Bragadini, the Venetian Go­vernor of Famagusta, tortur'd by the Turks, when Cyprus was taken; his Skin being salted and stuft, according to the old Persian Method. And as the same Valerian, clad in his Royal Purple, with his Back lifted Sapores into the Saddle; so was Bajazet forc't to assist Tamerlane, when he mounted. [Page]The Men of Condition used of old to ride with a Banner, and so they con­tinue to do to this day. A Present of one or more Changes of Raiment was a Mark of Favour among the Ae­gyptians, Jews and Syrians, as long since as the days of the Patriarch Jo­seph; and the Habit (the Calaat) sent by the Grand Seignior, or the King of Persia, to any Subject or Fo­reigner, is now one of the highest In­stances of Royal Bounty.

In the Monuments of their Dead the Persians of former Ages placed Magi to keep the Tomb; Arrian. l. 6. expedit. Alex. p. 144 and in this present Age the Mahometans give a Maintenance to a greater or less num­ber of Moullah's, who read the Law in the Moschees, and take care of the Sepulchres, where their Princes are in­terr'd. And as of old they hired their Women Mourners to make a solemn Lamentation at Funerals, so now the Jewish Women are hired for the same purpose. I shall add no more, but that at Aleppo, (as my worthy Friend [Page]Mr. Aaron Goodyear informs me, to whom I profess my self indebted for many useful Notices) in the Month of June the Women go to the River, and with solemn Sorrow bewaile Tam­muz, and afterward make themselves very merry; which is no other, than the practice of one of the oldest Su­perstitions in the World, of which I shall treat at large.

The Heathen Mythologists affirm, Apollodor. Bibliot. l. 3. c. 13. that Cinyras the Assyrian founded the City of Paphos in the Island of Cyprus; where, having married the Daughter of the King of that Country, he be­gat Oxyporus and Adonis; that Adonis was very beautiful, and beloved by Venus, when an Infant, who, that he might be bred carefully, sent him to Proserpina to be educated; but when she came to demand him, Proserpina resus'd to deliver her Charge; where­upon the Controversy was decided by Jupiter, that the Youth should stay a third part of the year with Proserpina, another third with Venus, and the re­mainder [Page]should be at his own Dispo­sal. But Adonis being pleas'd with the Charms of Beauty, chose to spend two thirds of his time with Venus, who passionately loved him; for which reason Diana being displeas'd with him, sent a wild Boar to assault him, by whose Teeth he fell a Sacrifice to her Indignation. Vid. Cyril. in Is. l. 2. tem. 3. p. 274. But others tell the Story differently, that Cinyras lay with his own Daughter Myrrha, on whom he begat Adonis; but, being asham'd of his Incest, expos'd the Infant on the top of the Mountains, where the Nymphs nurst and kept him, till he grew a most beautiful Youth, spend­ing most of his time in his Sports; at which Age Venus seeing him, sell vi­olently in love with him, and chose him her Gallant; that this created Jealousy in Mars, who turn'd himself into the shape of a wild Boar, and slew him; which, when Venus heard of, she gave her self up to the extrava­gant Sallies of an ungovernable Grief, and at last resolv'd to follow him in­to the Shades to demand him there; [Page]but Proserpina refusing to deliver him, they comprimis'd the Affair, that he should be half the year in the inferior World, and the other half in this; up­on which Venus return'd very joyful, and having inform'd her Followers of the Agreement, they instituted a so­lemn Festival, which was continued to be celebrated with all the Demonstra­tions of publick Exultation.

This Story, Plutarc. de Isid. & Osirid. with a little Variation, the Aegyptian Writers (from whom the Asiaticks deriv'd most of their Su­perstitious Rites and Observances) tell us, under the name of Osiris, whom Typhon nailed up in a Chest, (or Cof­fin) which he threw into the Nile, that it might be swallowed up of the Sea; that Isis, as soon as she heard of it, immediately went upon the search of Osiris, inquiring of all she met, till at last some Children inform'd her, what Typhon had done; whereupon, taking Anubis with her, she sailed down the River, and through the Ocean, till she came to Byblus in Sy­ria, [Page]where she found the Ark (or coffin) resting upon a Sprig of Heath, which she carried with her into the Ship, and so return'd to Egypt, and there hid the Coffin at Butis, where her Son Orus was nurst; that Typhon hunting in those parts by the Light of the Moon, which was then at full, found the Coffin, and cutting the Body into fourteen pieces scatter'd it up and down in several places; where­upon Isis hearing of the Fact, sailed up and down the Marches in a Boat of Reeds, till she had gather'd up the scatter'd Limbs, which she buried in divers places, to prevent any further Attempts of Typhon, and to create O­siris greater honour. In the Aegyptian Month Athyr, they say, Osiris was slain; and on the seventeenth of their Month Tybi, Isis return'd from Byblus, having spent almost two Months in the search. From this O­riginal came the practice of the Ae­gyptian Priests, who upon the first of those Anniversaries pretended, that the Body of Osiris was hid in their [Page]Temples, where, no one knew, where­upon they lamented him, as if that had been the very day, wherein he was murther'd by Typhon; they shav'd, and made bald their Heads, V. Herodot. Euterp. Jul. Firmic. Lucian. de Deâ Syr. Cyril. & Procop. in Isai. 18. &c. (the Custom of such, as were in the deepest Mourning) they thumpt their Breasts, they wan­dred up and down the Streets making heavy Lamentations, (in imi­tation of the Mournings, and Pere­grinations of Isis;) and if there hap­pen'd to be any of the Inhabitants of Caria at that time in Aegypt, they slasht their Faces with Knives and Lan­cets, (as the Priests of Baal used to do, when their Idol would not answer them;) they cut their Arms, and ve­ry often made Incisions into the Wounds of the last year, not quite healed: And after they had done this for some time, ( Plutarch says, for 4 days) they pretended to find the Body, which they had been so earnestly looking for; and on the nineteenth day of the Month Athyr, when it was night the Priests made their Procession to the [Page]River with an Ark of Gold cover'd with the holy Stole; upon which, as soon as they had poured Water, the By-standers cried out, ( [...]) we have found him, let us turn our Lamentations into Joy: After this they return'd and made merry, treating themselves with Cakes, where­on they stampt the Figure of a Sea­horse, i. e. Typhon; and at the same time they wrote an Epistle to the Wo­men of Byblus, that Adonis was found, (for he, whom the Aegyptians called Osiris, the Phaenicians and Syrians na­med Thammuz, says St. Hierome, and Adonis, says Cyril and Procopius;) this Epistle they put into an Earthen Pot, say the above-named Fathers, ( [...], Lucian calls it [...];) the Jews say, 'twas an Ark, or little Ship made of Reeds or Paper, which, after the performance of some (pro­bably Magical) Rites, they seal'd and committed to the Waves, and of its own accord in seven days time it was carried by the Winds to Byblus, but never to any other place on the Sea­coast [Page]of Phaenicia: And when the Wo­men of that City received it, they put an end to their Lamentations, and be­gun their joyful Festival with Dances, and solemn Feasting. As the precise time of the beginning the Festival at Byblus commenc't from the hour, in which they receiv'd the Epistle from Aegypt; so the exact time to begin the Mourning was fixt, says Lucian, by another extraordinary Circum­stance; the River Adonis at that sea­son, from its rise on the side of Mount Libanus, to its fall into the Sea, being all bloody, the Sea it self also for a considerable space being discolour'd with the same, (the Natives believing that at that time Adonis was actual­ly slain on the Mountain, and that his Blood alter'd the Colour both of the River and the Ocean) though one of the more inquisitive Byblians told Lu­cian, that the bloody face of the Wa­ters proceeded from a reddish sort of Earth, which the strong Winds, that at that time used to blow, brought down into the River, and gave the [Page]Streams their Tincture. At this time the Woman began their Mourning, (having first offer'd the Sacrifices of the Dead to Adonis, as the Aegypti­ans used to do) and shaved their Heads, (which, whoever refus'd to do, was by way of Penance obliged for a whole day to prostitute her self to all Strangers, and whatever she got, was to be spent in a Sacrifice to Ve­nus) their Lamentations, says L. 19. Am­mianus Marcellinus being as extrava­gant, as those of a Mother for an only Son.

The Epistles sent from Alexandria to give notice, that Osiris or Adonis was found, are mention'd, say the Fathers, by the Prophet Isaiah, 18.2. Wo to the Land that sends their Am­bassadors by the Sea in Vessels of Bull­rushes upon the water; or, as the Sep­tuagint more pertinently, [...]) and the mournful So­lemnity by the Prophet Ezekiel, 8.14. [Page]who among the abominable Idola­tries of the People of the Jews, mentions the Womens weeping for Tham­mûz: Cyril. in Is. [...]; ità & Procop. in loc. & Theodorit, in Ezek. 8. Hieron. ib. Ste­phan. [...]. Procop. ubi supr. [...]. For from Ae­gypt the Superstition spread it self over all the neighbouring Countries, over Phae­nicia, Syria, and Cy­prus; who challeng'd the mock Deity for their own; nor did the peculiar People of God, the Israelites, escape the Infecti­on, but they also fell into the same Madness.

The old Arabian Zabii, says Ben Maimon, affirm, that in that night in which Thammùz was slain, all the I­dols that were in the World, met at Babylon in the Temple of the Sun, who related to them what had befall'n Thammûz; whereupon the Images wept, and lamented all night, and the next Morning every one of them flew [Page]back to his old station: From whence, says he, came the Custom of Mourn­ing early in the Morning over Tham­mûz, in the Month called by his name: the Month Thammûz, says St. Hierome, answers to our June; and the Jewish Astronomers call the Sun's entrance into Cancer, Thekupha Thammuz, the Revolution or Period of Thammuz. The whole Feast was called by the Greeks, [...], or [...]; the Death of the mock God [...], the Search after him [...], the find­him [...]. The Festivals having a place in the old Kalendar; Gruter, 138, 139. in which we find Isid. Aavigium, not Lavatio, as Vrsinus reads it, but navigium, as it ought to be read; and in another Month Heurisis. V. Macrob. Saturnal. l. 1. c. 21. The whole had its Mythological Moral; for by Adonis, Osiris, and Thammuz, was meant the Sun, who when the Summer Solstice was past, moving backward toward the South, seemed to have deprived the Northern Hemisphere of his Presence, and Influences.

L. 2. c. 4. l. 4. c. 14. Julius Pollux says, that the In­habitants of Phaenicia called Adonis, Gingras, probably from the name of a Pipe, made of the Bone of a Goose­leg, which they used in his Solemnity, which made a very melancholy, and sorrowful Musick; and they had a Dance called by the same name in remembrance of the first Inventor of Husbandry, who died in the Summer-time, as he was hunting, and who is honour'd yearly with a mournful Song by the Farmers of the Country, (who at that time used to sow their Wheat and Barley in the Fields near the Ci­ties, says the Scholiast on Therocritus) accompanied by as doleful Instrumen­tal Musick. The Custom still in use at Aleppo of frequenting the River at this Festival, I presume had its Origi­nal also in Aegypt, where the Inhabi­tants paid a peculiar Veneration to the Waters of Nilus, as St. Athanasius, who was born there, affirms; and Lactantius adds, that they worshipt the River yearly, because there Isis begun her search of Osiris.

That all this Pomp was older than the Jewish Captivity, the holy Writ avers; it lasted to the days of Plu­tarch, and the Astronomer Ptolomee, who mention it; (as do almost all the old Apologists for Christianity:) Julius Pollux enumerates the Cere­monies of the Mourning in the Reign of Commodus; and Lucian avers, that he saw one of those little Arks that brought the Letter from Alexandria floating into the Harbour, while he was at Byblus; the practice continued in Aegypt, when Cyril was Patriarch there, about the year 440 after Christ, and in Phaenicia in the times of Pro­copius of Gaza, who lived above a 100 years after Cyril; and to this day is in use at Aleppo, as my honoured Friend informs me, and probably in some other Cities of that Country.

I thought it necessary to make this Digression, which is not disagreeable to my Subject; and if the Reader (whom I earnestly desire to correct [Page]the Errata, before he begins the Book) find any advantage by the Underta­king, I shall not think my time ill em­ploy'd.

The CONTENTS of the several Chapters in the History.

  • Chap. 1. THE Building of Tadmur by So­lomon, Page 3.
  • Chap. 2. The Situation, Product, and Inhabitants, p. 6.
  • Chap. 3. The Commerce, and Riches of the City, p. 11.
  • Chap. 4. The Civil Government of the City from Solmon 's time, p. 16.
  • Chap. 5. The Religion, and Ecclesiastical Government, p. 19.
  • Chap. 6. Its several Fortunes from its Foundation to Alexander the Great, p. 24.
  • [Page]Chap. 7. Its State under the Kings of Syria to Augu­stus, p. 26.
  • Chap. 8. Its Condition from the Reign of Augustus to Hadrian, p. 28.
  • Chap. 9. The State of the City under Hadrian, p. 33.
  • Chap. 10. Its several Fortunes from Hadrian to Gallienus, p. 38.
  • Chap. 11. The Life and Athievements of Odenathus, p. 42.
  • Chap. 12. The State of the Roman Em­pire at that time, with a Con­tinuation of the Acts of Ode­nathus, p. 47.
  • Chap. 13. The Folly and Stupidity of Gallienus, with the Victory of Odenathus over the Persi­ans, p. 53.
  • [Page]Chap. 14. The Victory of Ode­nathus over Quietus and Ba­lista, p. 60.
  • Chap. 15. The Murder of Odenathus, the short Reign of Maeonius, with his Character, p. 66.
  • Chap. 16. The Death of the Emperor Valerian, p. 70.
  • Chap. 17. The Original, and Birth of Zenobia, p. 76.
  • Chap. 18. Her Learning, Magnificence, and Virtues, p. 80.
  • Chap. 19. The Religion of Zeno­bia, p. 85.
  • Chap. 20. Her Courage and Bra­very, p. 89.
  • Chap. 21. Her illustrious Atchivements, Victory over Heraclian, and Conquest of Aegypt, p. 94.
  • [Page]Chap. 22. The Reign of Aurelian, the Battel of Imma, p. 100.
  • Chap. 23. The fatal Battel of Emesa, the Siege of Palmyra, p. 105.
  • Chap. 24. Palmyra taken, Zenobia made a Prisoner, p. 111.
  • Chap. 25. Zenobia 's Ministers slain, and among them Longinus, p. 115.
  • Chap. 26. The Rebellion of the Palmy­renians, the City destroy'd by Aurelian, p. 117.
  • Chap. 27. The History of Firmius, Ze­nobia 's Confederate, p. 121.
  • Chap. 28. The Account of Zenobia, till Aurelian 's triumph, p. 124.
  • Chap. 29. The triumph of Aurelian o­ver Zenobia and Tetri­cus, p. 127.
  • [Page]Chap. 30. The History of Zeno­bia after the triumph till her Death, with an Account of her Family, p. 133.
  • Chap. 31. The Murther of Aureli­an, p. 136.
  • Chap. 32. The State of Palmyra under Dioclesian, p. 140.
  • Chap. 33. The History of Palmyra from the Reign of Honorius to Justi­nian, p. 150.
  • Chap. 34. The State of Palmyra from Justinian to the present Age, p. 153.
In the Appendix.
  • THE Inscriptions, p. 163.
  • Chap. 1. Of the names Tadmur and Palmyra, p. 175.
  • Chap. 2. Of the names of the Inhabi­tants, p. 187.
  • Chap. 3. Of the publick Officers, p. 197.
  • Chap. 4. Of their Idolatry and Super­stition, p. 241.
  • Chap. 5. An Account of Vaballa­thus, p. 272.
  • Chap. 6. The History of Longinus, p. 287.
  • Chap. 7. The Commentary on the In­scriptions, p. 295.
A View of the Ruines of Palmyra alias Tadmor, taken on the Southern Side.
THE HISTORY OF Palmy …

THE HISTORY OF Palmyra.

HISTORIES of Remote Countries, and Strange Re­volutions, have been always entertained with Respect: And the pleasure of Seeing at so great a Distance, and Hearing of dismal Ca­tastrophe's, wherein we have no other immediate share, but that of Wonder and Pity, is not to be reckon'd among the meanest Satisfactions of a Wise Man's Life; since every Turn of Pro­vidence in a Foreign Nation, every new Scene of Prosperity or Adversity is a Lesson to the rest of the World: And [Page 2]the best Rules of Behaviour both for a publick and private Capacity, are de­ducible from such remarkable Occur­rences.

And among all the great Revolu­tions that have call'd for the Astonish­ment and Commiseration of Mankind, the several Fortunes of Palmyra are not the least remarkable; a Country far distant from our Region, distinguisht by Nature from the rest of the World by a separate Situation; and an Empire, that in the space of Ten Years over-ran all the East, baffled the Forces of the Persians, subdued Egypt, and made all Asia to the Hellespont tremble; But in a few Months afterward was stript of all its Grandeur, and by degrees re­duced to the lowest state of Poverty, as it is this day. Of this Country I in­tend to treat, of its Founder, and Anti­quity; its Situation, and Plenty; its Government Ecclesiastical and Civil; and its several Fortunes and Conditions, as far as my Reading will assist me, till some more able Critick shall undertake the Task; and I shall begin with such an Account of the Place as the Antients furnish us with.

CHAP. I.

WHen Solomon had finisht his stu­pendious Temple at Jerusalem (which better deserv'd to be reckon'd among the World's Wonders, than that at Ephesus,) and the Noble Palace which he built for himself, 1 King. 9.10, 18. 2 Chron. 8.3, 4. in the Twentieth Year of his Reign he made War against Hamath-Zobah, which had been sub­dued by David, but revolted; and ha­ving conquer'd it, he built Tadmor in the Wilderness, the Ʋpper and Nether Bethhoron, Baalath, and all the Store-Cities, which he strongly fortify'd with Walls, and Gates, and Bars; they be­ing his Frontier Towns, and the Limits of his vast Empire: 2 Chron. 9.26. For he reign'd over all the Kings from the River (Euphrates) to the Land of the Philistines, and to the Border of Egypt. 1 King. 4.24. From Tiphsac even to Azzah: i. e. from Gaza to Thap­sachus, which Was one of the Passes over the Euphrates.

The Arabick Translator of 2 Chron. 8.3. implies, that Tadmor was a City before Solomon's time, and that he only re­edified [Page 4]it; that it was a Metropolis of old, as it was in the latter times, and had many Towns under its Jurisdiction: nor is it altogether improbable, those Parts of the World near the Place where the Ark rested after the Deluge ceas'd, being first peopled. The Arabick Hi­storian Vers Poc. p. 53. Abulfarajus, says, That So­lomon, in the Twenty fourth Year of his Reign, having destroy'd the City of Antioch, built seven Cities in its stead, of which Tadmor was one. But the Fabulous Historian of Antioch, Par. 1. p. 185. & Par. 2. p. 152. John Matela, averrs, That the Foun­dations of Palmyra were lay'd in the same place in which David slew Goliah, and cut off his Head with his own Sword; and that King Solomon, in Memory of this great Victory, built a Noble City there, and, from the Fate of the Giant, call'd it Palmyra. While Antiq. l. 8. c. 2. Josephus thus informs us, That Solo­mon, after he had built Gazara, which Pharoah, having taken it from the Phi­listines, gave to his Daughter, not far from it built two Cities, Betachora, and Baleth, with other Places, to which he might retire for his Pleasure, that he might enjoy a temperate Air, excel­lent [Page 5]Fruits, and pleasant Streams: From whence he past into the Desart above Syria, and making himself Master of it, lay'd the Foundations of a great City (which Hier. in Ezek. 47. he beautified with extraordi­nary Buildings) two Days Journey from the Ʋpper Syria, and one from Euphrates, but from Babylon six Days Journey. And the reason why he built this City so far from the inhabited Places of Syria, was, that in the Upper Parts there was no Water, but in that Place only there were Fountains and Wells (as it appears by the Peutinger Tables, that near it stood the Centum Putei.) (a) When therefore he had built the City, and fenced it with strong Walls, he named it Tadmor, as it is now called by the Syrians, while the Greeks call it Palmyra.

CHAP. II.

FRom its Founder and Name, I shall proceed to consider its Situation and Plenty. As to its Situation, from the Description that Josephus gives of it, it is plain, that, though it stood in a Desart Country, it was a very Fertile Spot of Ground, the Air being very moderate and healthy: For when Epist. ad Porph. Lon­ginus invites his Friend Porphyry thi­ther, he encourages him to undertake the Journey, upon two Accounts; first, That they might renew their old Friendship; secondly, That he might recover his broken Health, by the ex­cellency of the Air of Palmyra.

Lib. 8. p. 205. Ptolemy places it East from Alexan­andria; (in the same Climate with An­tioch, Seleucia, Hierapolis, Emesa, and other Cities of Alexandria, says the Author of the Alexandrian Chronicon,) Chron. A­lex. p. 82. in the Longit. of 71 deg. 30 min. and the Latit. of 34 deg. the Longest Day being there above 14 Hours.

The first Inhabitants of Tadmur, I conjecture, were the Sons of Abraham [Page 7]by Keturah; for they are said to be sent by their Father into the East, Gen. 25.6. i. e. into the East from Je­rusalem, and the Land of Canaan, into the Desarts of Arabia, and the Coun­tries bordering on the Euphrates, whose Inhabitants are called, in Holy Writ, The Children of the East; and were, for that reason also, call'd Saracens, that is, Orientals, or Easterlings, (as our most Learned Pocock affirms.) Now the Sa­racens are said by Lib. 23. cap. ult. Amm. Marcellinus, to be the Arabes Scenitae (though Pliny and Ptolomy distinguish them) to whom the Palmyrenians were conterminous, if not the same; and for this reason, I doubt not, but Odenathus, in all the latter Writers, is call'd the King of the Saracens; though Zenobia, in her Let­ter to Aurelian, distinguishes the Sara­cens from her Subjects, reckoning the Saracens among her Foreign Troops and Auxiliaries. In the Ecclesiaslick Notitia, it is accounted a part of Phoe­nicia Libanesia. And Porphyry, treat­ing of Longinus's Inviting him to Pal­myra, says, He undertook to persuade him to leave Sicily, and to travel into Phoenicia. Others make it a part of [Page 8] Arabia; but 'tis commonly reputed by Ptolemy, and others, a part of Syria, as Phoenicia is another part of that large Country: though Zenobia, in her Let­ter above-mentioned, distinguishes the Palmyrenians from the Syrians, (as L. 1. p. 40. Zosimus also does.

That it stood in a Wilderness, besides the Holy Writ, and Josephus, Nat. Hist. tom. 1. l. 1. §. 21. p. 583. ad Paris. Pliny, who was Contemporary with the Jewish Hi­storian, agrees, who thus describes it: Palmyra is a City eminent in its Situa­tion, in the riches of its Soil, and its pleasant Streams, being surrounded on every side with a vast Desart of Sand: It seems to have been separated from the rest of the World, and did preseve its Liberty in a private Condition be­tween the two Mighty Empires, the Roman and Parthian; and as soon as any War happens to break out, it is equally their care to engage it on their side, and in their Interest: It is di­stant from Seleucia on the Tygris 337 Miles; from the neighbouring Shore of Syria, or the Mediterranean, 203; and from Damascus 176.’ The same Author, in other places also, mentions the Solitudes of Palmyra; beyond [Page 9]which, on one hand, is Stelendena (a Country not so much as nam'd by other Writers;) on the other side, they reacht home to Emesa; and to the Westward, as far as Petra in Arabia Felix, from whence to the Persian Gulf, it was all Desart.

It was distant from the Euphrates a Day's Journey, says Ʋbi sup. Josephus: Not far from that Noble River, says Lib. 5. Bell. Civ. p. 676. Ap­pian, (for as soon as Marc. Antony threaten'd the Sack of the City, the In­habitants immediately transported all their Goods beyond the River, the Banks of which they defended with their Archers, and so leaving the Town empty, baffled the Design, and de­ceiv'd the Expectations of the Roman Troops,) but situate by a River that run by its Walls, whose Name Ptolemy either knew not, or omitted. But other Geographers call it Palmyra, Domin. Marius Niger, Ma­ginus, &c. af­firming, that it had its Rise in the Pal­myrene Mountains, ran through the Country, and at last emptied it self into the Euphrates, though now there are no footsteps of its course left: Nor is it a wonder, that a small River should be swallowed up in a long tract [Page 10]of Time, of such vast quantities of Sand.

When Solomon built it, he gave it all the Advantages of Strength and Se­curity that the Rules of Fortification in that Age allowed of; and it conti­nued so as long as it was a Frontier Garrison, fenc'd with strong Walls, and an advantagious Situation; but better guarded by a brave Garrison, the Mi­litia of Palmyra being esteem'd very stout. Their Archers were excellent Marks-men, says Ʋbi sup. Appian, and their Horse-men well armed with heavy Ar­mour, and very secure, (the Army of Zenobia, saith the Historian, consisting of Anchers, Zosim. l. 1. p. 44. and Horse-men arm'd Cap-a-pé,) who, notwithstanding the weight of their Arms, were much better Horse-men than the Romans; and such a Zonar. tom. 2. p. 237. Value did they set upon their Hor­ses, that no greater Affront or Disgrace could be offer'd to a Palmyrenian, than to take his Horse from him. Nor did the Romans disdain their Assistance; for in their Militia with the Assyrians and Moors, the Inhabitants of Palmyrene and Osroene were muster'd.

CHAP. III.

PALMTRA was the Metropolis of the Province, and gave it its Name, being a Place of great Antiquity, and great Trade; Rich, says Pliny, in the Fertility of its Soil, but much more so by its Commerce; for it had not only the Advantage of its own Com­modities, but was the Thorough-fare of all the Merchants that liv'd beyond it toward the Mediterranean, who traded to Forath, and Charax, and other Ports on the Persian Gulf, if I rightly under­stand Nat. Hist. l. 6. §. 32. p. 722. Pliny, who says, that at Petra in Arabia the two Ways met, both of those who came through Palmyra (pro­bably from Antioch, Seleucia in Pisidia, Laodicea, and other conterminous Places,) and of those also who came from Gaza, travelling towards the Gulf, it being impossible, but the Caravans, who made that their constant Road both to and from Persia, must help to enrich the Stages where they Baited.

But this was not all its Happiness; its Inhabitants were great Merchants, [Page 12]says Ʋbi sup. Appian. And Marc. Antony thought the Plunder of this City a sufficient Recompence for all the Fa­tigues and Hardships which his Horse endured in that Countrey, during the Persian War, tho' he failed of his At­tempt: They had form'd themselves into a Company, under a President and Governor of their own. (An East-India Trade cannot well be carry'd on by a single Person, though he were one of the Merchants of Tyre, who were Companions of Princes.) For I find in one of the Inscriptions, Pag. 99. that Septimius Orodes was honourd with an Illustrious Testimonial from (a) the Presidents, or Chiefs of the Merchants. And I doubt not, but they carry'd the Manu­factures, and other Commodities of Asia, down the Euphrates to Balsora, [Page 13]or perhaps no farther than Vologesia, Vid. Ap­pend. and brought from Persia the Merchan­dizes of India and Arabia, and so fur­nisht the Romans with Spices, and Silks, and other rich Goods: For though they are said to lie far from the Sea, and without the advantage of the River (which must be retracted, since it an­ciently had the assistance of a River, though it is since lost in the Sands,) yet it must be acknowledged, they were not far from the Euphrates, a Noble and Navigable River, and had the conveniency of their Camels and Dromedaries, by which sort of Car­riage all the Riches of the East were formerly brought into Europe by Ca­ravans, before the Cape of Good-Hope was discover'd.

But Palmyra had its own Product, Salt, with which the Inhabitants now drive a trade; and Dates, the Fruits of their Palm-Trees, which were not only great Delicacies at Rome, and elsewhere, Plut. Sym­pos. 8. qu. 4. (for Nicolaus Damascenus thought the Dates of Syria a fit Pre­sent for Augustus, and Phoenicia hath [Page 14]its Name from its (a) Palm-Trees, but was of the same Use to the Asiaticks, that the Cocoa is to the Indians, if we may believe Lib. 16. p. 746. Strabo, who affirms, that the Country about Euphrates pro­duces great quantities of Barley, but that the want of all other things was supplied by their Palm-Trees; that that single Tree afforded the Inhabitants both Wine and Vinegar, Honey and Meal; and out of it they wove their Cloaths: The Shells serve the Smiths for Fire; and when you have soakt the Shells in Water, you may feed your Cattle, your Oxen and Sheep with them: And 'tis reported, that there is a Persic Poem, which enumerates Three hundred and sixty Uses (one for every Day of the old Year) of the Palm­Tree. Id. p. 778. In some Places of Arabia they are perfum'd: And those in Plut. ubi sup. Syria, as they are most Beautiful to [Page 15]the Eye, so they are of a most delicious Taste to the Palate.

And the Ruines of its pompous Build­ings yet standing, erected before it be­came the Seat of the Eastern Empire, are a further and undeniable Demon­stration, that, notwithstanding its un­happy Situation in the Confines of two such Potent and Contentious Neigh­bours, as the Romans and the Parthians, it was once a very Flourishing and Wealthy Place, though now it looks like the Residence of Beggery and Famine.

CHAP. IV.

THE Government of Palmyra comes next to be consider'd, both in Ecclesiastical and Civil Affairs. And first, in Civil Affairs.

As long as it was in the hands of Solomon, I question not but it was govern'd, as the rest of his Provinces were, by such Lieutenants as himself appointed (the [...] & [...] of the several [...], whom Ant. l. 8. c. 2. Jo­sephus mentions) under Rehoboam, I take it for granted, it revolted with the rest of Syria, when Rezin became King of Damascus: but whether it submitted to the Power of Rezin, or form'd it self into a Commonwealth, as it was after­wards, or what its Government was till the days of Augustus, we have no Records. In his time, probably, it was govern'd by a Prince, or Toparch; almost every Town in Parthia, and the neighbouring Syria, upon the Death of Julius Caesar, or rather after the fatal Overthrow of Crassus, Appian l. 5. Bell. Civil. p. 671. being seiz'd upon by some Tyrant, the Parthians sup­porting [Page 17]porting them in their Usurpations, having been invited by those Roytelets to their Assistance. But supposing that it had fallen under one of those petty Princes, in Pliny's time it re­cover'd its old Form of Government; for he affirms, that in his days Palmyra was ( [...], sui Juris) neither sub­ject to the Romans, nor the Parthians, as F. Harduin well interprets the words (privatâ sorte) of the Natural Hi­storian. And Vopisc Aurel, Aurelian, in his Letter to Zenobia, when he requires her to sur­render herself, promises, that the Inha­bitants of the Country should be go­vern'd by their own Laws. And of this the Inscriptions are an unquestio­nable Evidence, wherein (a) the Senate and People of Palmyra are frequently said to have erected Monuments to those Illustrious Persons who had deserved well of the Republick. And Septi­mius [Page 18]Odaenathus, and Septimius Aeranes his Son, are said to be Men of the Sena­torian Dignity; and Rupilius Orodes, both a Senator, and of the Council of State.

In the Reign of Antoninus Caracalla it was a Roman Colony, as appears by the Coins: But under Odaenathus and his Sons it became the Seat of the Oriental Empire, conquer'd all Egypt, and forc'd a great part of the Roman Empire to acknowledge its Jurisdiction, being possest of all the East as far as Ancyra, and in a fair way to possess all Bythynia, as far as Chalcedon, had not the Natives taken Arms in behalf of Aurelian: But it is now under an Arab Prince, Nominated by, and Tributary to the Ottoman Port.

CHAP. V.

THE Religion of Palmyra, when it was subject to King Solomon, was, I question not, Jewish; but how long they retain'd Circumcision among them, after God in his just Judgment had confin'd Rehoboam's Kingdom to narrower Limits, I know not: This is very plain, that very many of the Pro­per Names of the Inhabitants in after Ages are Jewish, and Zenobia her self (who by her Name appears to have been a Syrian, and probably of Tadhmur, for there her Father liv'd when she lost her Empire, though she deriv'd her self Originally from Cleopatra Queen of Egypt) was a Jewess. And 'tis not alto­gether unlikely, that Longinus, in Com­plaisance to the Religion of his Mi­stress, in his admirable Treatise of the Sublime, speaks so honourably of Moses and his Writings: And if we may credit Benjamin Tudelensis, even in his time there were Two thousand profest Jews Inhabitants of that City. In process of time, I doubt not but they [Page 20]blended the Jewish Rites with those of the Gentiles, (as the new Inhabitants of Samaria did, after the Natives had been transported by Shalmanezer,) till at last Paganism prevail'd.

After Christianity was planted in the World, and St. Thaddeus had preach'd the Gospel by our Blessed Saviour's own Order at Edessa; I believe, that Holy Religion soon spread it self into the Neighbourhood, even to Tadhmur, tho' Paganism was not quite dispossest; as appears by the Inscriptions to their Country Gods, Alagbelus, and M. Ma­lachbelus, Jaribolus, Venus Aphacitis, and others, who all had at Palmyra their Temples, Priests, and Services. It was very early an Episcopal See, if not an Archiepiscopal, because it was the Metropolis of a Country: but in the Subscriptions of the ancient Coun­cils, or the Notitiae of the Church, we have very little or no mention of its Prelates. Marinus, Bishop of Palmyra, is said to have subscribed the Canons of the First General Council at Niece; and in the Sixth Act of that at Chal­cedon, John Bishop of Palmyra being absent, made his Subscription by the [Page 21]Hand of the Archbishop of Damascus; At which time (as from its being ruin'd by Aurelian), it held the rank of a poor Bishoprick, and was under the Metro­politan of Damascus: But in the No­titia collected by Leo the Wise, Edessa is the Metropolis of Phoenicia Libanesia, in the Patriarchate of Antioch, whose Suffragans were the Bishops of Laodicea, Palmyra, &c. by which it appears, that in Leo's time, Ann. Dom. 900. it was still a Bishoprick; and when it lost that Honour, I cannot determine.

In the Roman Martyrology of Baronius, on the 15th of June is celebrated the Memory of the Saints Lybia and Leonis, who were Sisters; and of Eutropia, a Girl of Twelve Years old, all of Pal­myra, who by divers Torments obtain'd the Crown of Martyrdom. It is true, there is no mention of these Brave Women in the Old Roman Martyrology, as Rosweyd accounts it, nor in Ado of Vienna, but the Acts of St. Febronia, who suffer'd under Dioclesian at Siba­polis (perhaps Scythopolis, V. Mart. Jun. 25. or the [...]) in Syria, mention them, as Per­sons who suffer'd in the same cruel Per­secution. It is plain, from the Inscrip­tions [Page 22]found at Tadhmur, that Dioclesian had been in that Country; and from the Church-Historians, that he rais'd a violent Persecution in Syria: And that which gave Rise to it, was in all like­lihood that which Eusebius observes, that, a little while after the Christians of Nicodemia had felt the Fury of the Emperor, several Confederacies were form'd in Melitene, and other Parts of Syria, to seize the Empire, and to de­throne Dioclesian. Now, in every In­surrection or Tumult, the Christians were sure to suffer, as the Authors of Sedition, though they were the most Peaceable and Loyal Men in the World, both by Principle and Practice.

Thus Christianity subsisted in those days of Persecution, when the Number of Martyrs encreas'd the Number of Confessors: But then Peace and Plenty were, by the Bounty of the Great Con­stantine and his Successors made the Churches Patrimony. I question not but the Followers of our Blessed Saviour, at Palmyra, had their share of the Prosperity which their Brethren en­joy'd; till the Viciousness of the Chri­stian Morals, and the execrable Opi­nions [Page 23]and Heresies that debaucht the Faith of the Orientals, subjected those once Famous Churches to the Maho­metan Yoke: For as soon as Syria sub­mitted to the Power, and acknow­ledg'd the Dominion of the Successors of that False Prophet, I presume, Pal­myra was by degrees reduc'd to the mean Condition in which it now is; for per­haps, no one City hath run so many risks of different Fortune, as Palmyra, though it hath hitherto preserv'd its ancient Name and Situation; while, of Ctesiphon and Persepolis, Niniveh and Babylon, with many other Cities in that part of Asia, it may be averr'd, what the Psalmist says of Sodom, and the other Cities which God destroyed, their Memorial is perisht with them.

CHAP. VI.

IT is a very difficult Task, to give a just and clear Account of the se­veral Fates of Ancient Kingdoms and Governments, especially when Nature hath seem'd to please it self, by placing them in a remote Situation, and at a distance both of Place and Communi­cation from other Nations: And this is the case of Tadhmur, which was re­pair'd, if not built by Solomon, a Great, a Wise, and a Victorious Prince, who beautify'd it with whatever might af­ford it Strength and Ornament; lost, I take it for granted, in a little time after, under his Son Rehoboam, when, through his Folly, and God's just Judg­ment, the greatest part of his Territo­ries revolted from him. I conjecture, that as long as the Kingdom of Da­mascus kept up its Grandeur, so long Palmyra was in Peace, either under those Kings, or under the Conduct of its own Senate: 2 King. 23.29. But when Pharoah Necoh went up against the King of As­syria to the River Euphrates, and made himself Master of all Syria, I doubt not [Page 25]but it was for a while subject to him, till Nebuchadnezzar conquer'd all those Countries home to the Gates of Pelu­sium, now Damiata. The Jo. Males. par. 2. pag. 152. Fabulous Historian of Antioch would have the World believe, that when Nebuchad­nezzar intended to Besiege Jerusalem, it was in the hands of the Jews, who had Mann'd it with a very stout Garrison; and that Victorious Prince, not think­ing fit to leave a Place so well fortified behind him, sate down before it; and when he had taken it, burnt it, and then besieg'd and took Jerusalem.

After this, it continued tributary to the Princes of the Babylonish and Persian Empires, though perhaps govern'd by a Senate of its own Citizens; and in the same State it remain'd under the Successors of the Great Alexander (the Kings of Syria) being united by Se­leucus, I doubt not, to the rest of his Territories; whence, in like manner, as the other Cities under his Government, it receiv'd the Use of the Syrian Epocha, the Aera Antiochena, Dhilcarnain, or Se­leucidarum, and the Names of the Ma­cedonian Months, which the Inscrip­tions undeniably prove.

CHAP. VII.

SYRIA (says Bell. Civ. l. 5. p. 676. Appian) was go­vern'd by the Posterity of Selencus Nicator, to the days of Antiochus Pius, and his Son: but when Pompey the Great conquer'd it, and made it a Pro­vince, it was govern'd by a Roman President: The first who bore that Office, was Scaurus; and after him, though not immediately, Gabinius. Gabinius was succeeded by Crassus, who being slain by the Parthians left his Government to Bibulus. But whether, in all this space of time, while the Ro­man Eagle hover'd over the East, Pal­myra was a Sharer in in the Common Calamity, and felt the Talons of that Bird of Prey, we have no Accounts.

After the Death of Julius Caesar, every City submitted to a Prince of their own; the Parthians affording them their Assistance, having, upon the Invitation of those Tyrants, penetrated Syria. This incens'd Marc Antony, who expell'd the Usurpers, exacted heavy Taxes from other Cities, and attempted [Page 27] Palmyra. For when Cleopatra, who waited on him in Cilicia, was return'd home, Antony, who had given himself up to her Embraces, and, to the loss of his Honour, obey'd all her Dictates, commanded his Horse to Plunder Pal­myra, upon the light and trifling pre­text, that by reason of their Situation in the Confines of the Romans and Par­thians, the Palmyrenians were firm to neither Interest, but minded their own Profit, and, the Encrease of their Trade and Merchandise; but in truth, that he might pay his Soldiers with the Spoils of that wealthy City.

The Inhabitants of Palmyra being aware of the Invasion, carry'd all their rich Moveables to the other side of the River, the Banks of which they lined with their Archers. Upon which, An­tony's Troops finding the City empty of Inhabitants, and of the Riches they so eagerly coveted, having lost their labour, return'd to their Camp. This Invasion occasion'd the next Parthian War, many of the petty Princes of Syria flying for Shelter to the Parthians, while Marc Antony, having been so scandalously foyl'd, stay'd no longer in [Page 28] Syria to settle Affairs, and quiet Di­sturbances, but hasten'd into Egypt to attend Cleopatra, to whom he had en­tirely devoted himself and his Fortunes.

CHAP. VIII.

IN this state of Freedom, Ease and Plenty, it continued under Augustus; and the succeeding Emperors govern'd by their own Officers and Laws, as Pliny expresly averrs, till the Reign of Trajan, when, I conjecture, it fell into the same Common Calamity with Edessa, Nisibis, Dio Cass. Traj. and other Frontier Towns of the East (whose fate it is com­monly to be harrast on both sides;) for Trajan having, in his Sixth Consu­late, declar'd War against the Arme­nians and Parthians, upon the pretext, That the King of Armenia had receiv'd his Crown from the King of Persia, whereas he ought to have taken it from the hands of the Roman Emperor; but in truth, stimulated by his desire of [Page 29]Vain-glory, made an Expedition into the East, reduc'd Armenia, and settled the Government of that Countrey; took Nisibis and Batnae, and was ho­nour'd by the Senate with the Name of Parthicus, added to his other Titles. After which, he winter'd at Antioch, where he, by an extraordinary Provi­dence, and with much difficulty, escap't perishing in that great Earth­quake which had almost ruind that Noble City. After this, he return'd into the East, past the Euphrates, sub­dued all Adiabene, Arbela, and Gauga­mela, and came to Babylon; the Par­thians being unable to oppose him, having been much weaken'd by their Civil Dissentions. Then he past the Tigris, and went to Ctesiphon, and thence pursued his Conquests to the Ocean, where he declared, That if he had been as young as Alexander, he would have follow'd the Example of that Illustrious Prince, and have sail'd into India. But while he was thus amusing himself with his vain Ambi­tious Thoughts, the Provinces which he had subdued revolted, and seiz'd and murther'd the Roman Garrisons. [Page 30]Whereupon, Trajan commanded Lusius and Maximus to chastise the Rebels, and to reduce the Cities to Terms of Duty and Obedience. In this Expedi­tion Maximus was slain in Battle; but Lusius recover'd Nisibis, took Edessa, as he did also Seleucia, and other Places, by his Lieutenant-Generals: Where­upon, to prevent their future Revolt, Trajan gave the Parthians a King, and settled the Estate of the East (as In Au­relian. Vopiscus calls that Country, be­cause, in respect of Rome, the Sun seem'd to rise in Parthia,) and this the Coins confirm, which mention the re­ducing of Armenia and Mesopotamia under the Power and Jurisdiction of the Romans in this Emperor's Reign.

At this time, 'tis probable, Palmyra was much ruin'd; for otherwise it would not have wanted the favourable Assistance of Trajan's Successor, who may be justly reckon'd their Second Founder. Hadrian was a magnificent Prince, and a great Builder (and for that reason call'd the Wall-Flower, a great number of eminent Edifices owing their Being and Beauty to his Liberality:) He it was who built the [Page 31] Fora at Nicodemia and Nice, Chron. A­lex. p. 598. the Four High-ways, and that part of the Wall that looks toward Bithynia: At Cyzicum he built the Temple, and floar'd it with Marble: And in many other Places he either erected New, or re­pair'd the Old Buildings, both Sacred and Civil. And in almost every City of his vast Empire, he left some Marks of his Magnificence. Hadrian. Dio Cassius af­firming, that he generously assisted all the Towns that were subject to his Em­pire, or confederate with it, of which he visited more than any of his Prede­cessors, a great part of his Reign being employed in more than one Progress through those spacious Territories: some Cities he adorn'd with Aqueducts, others with safe Ports; upon some he bestow'd a Donative of Corn, or Pub­lick Buildings; upon others, Money or Privileges. Jo. Malel. par. 1. pag. 363, 364. At Antioch he repair'd what had been destroy'd by that ter­rible and furious Earthquake that in Trajan's time had almost buried that noble City in its own Ruines; as he did the Temple at Cyzicum, which in his own Reign had been destroyed by another Earthquake, and made it one [Page 32]of the World's Wonders for Archi­tecture and Beauty, bestowing great Privileges upon the poor undone Inha­bitants, which was the noblest Charity: He also re-erected the Colossus at Rhodes, which had been many years before thrown down by an Earthquake. Above all, he was a great Benefactor to the City of Athens, toward which he al­ways exprest a peculiar Regard; as in Requital, they call'd him, while alive, Adrianus Olympius in their Coines and Inscriptions; as he was in several other Cities, after his death, Deify'd, espe­cially in Syria; for to speak the Truth, and to be doing Good, were, in the esteem even of the Heathen World, most God-like Qualities.

CHAP. IX.

BUT the Liberality of this Muni­ficent Emperor was not confined to Greece, or the adjacent Parts of Asia; the remoter Cities of Syria, who had suffer'd so deeply during the War which Trajan made in the East, were not ex­cluded from their share in his Bounty: For he had been a Spart. Hadr. Lieutenant-General in that Expedition, and had seen the dismal Effects of War, and Military Rage and Rapine; and upon the Death of Trajan, had made a Peace with the Parthians (envious of the Glory of his Predecessor, says Sextus Rufus, very maliciously,) having remov'd the King, whom Trajan had set over them, and withdrawn the Roman Armies out of all the Countries beyond the Euphrates; and because he was not ambitious to have his Name inscribed on all his Pub­lick Buildings, as it was customary, he gave it to the Cities which he new built or beautified, among whom we must reckon Palmyra, Steph. de Ʋrb. which, after he had repair'd its Ruines, he call'd Ha­drianople; [Page 34]and (with the leave of Father Harduin, perhaps the Coin in the King of France's Treasury, and in Monsieur Patin, p. 203. with this Incription, ΑΔΡΙΑΝ—ΜΗΤΡΟΡΟΛΙϹ) may be ascribed not to Hadrianople in Thrace, nor that other City in Cyrenaica of the same Name, but to Palmyra, which was a Mother-City, as appears by the Pag. 99. In­scriptions, and by Ptolemy, who not only reckons it among the Metropoles of Coelesyria, but makes it the Capital of the Province of Palmyrene, which had its Denomination from it. And it is not unfitly represented by a Woman sitting on a Hill: For Tadmor is en­closed on three sides with long ridges of Mountaines, the Castle being built on one of them, which commands the Entrance into the City: And to this City I would ascribe the Coin of Cara­calla, in Monsieur Patin, p. 302. with the Figure of an Archer almost Naked on the reverse, his Thin Habit imply­ing the Heats; and his Arms, the Militia of his Country; the Sagit­tarii of Palmyrene being Famous in Hi­story.

This City, I doubt not, but Adrian visited, when, in the Sixth Year of his Empire, he made his Progress into the East, and receiv'd the Homage of all the Kings and Toparchs, whose Territories lay in those Parts. And this his Expe­dition, I understand to be meant in the Inscriptions. In which Expedition, Pag. 105. Malech Agrippa, the Son of Jaraius, was the second time the Secretary of the City; and when that Prince happen'd to draw near his end, and the Palmy­renians were in fear of losing their Pa­tron, their Neighbours of the City Tieve, three Days Journey from Tadmor towards the Euphrates (probably the Oriza of Ptolemy, as the Learned Mr. Halley conjectures) and a City of Paelmyrene, as Ptolemy reckons it, made their Vows for his Recovery, (as ap­pears by the Inscription:) Pag. 109. For in the Last Year, the Nineteenth of his Reign, (not the Seventh, as the Aera of Seleu­cidae is mistaken in the First Account,) Agathangelus of Abila, Vid. Ap­pend. the Decapo­litan, built an Arch, or Cupola, in the Temple of Jupiter, and erected a Bed of State (or Pulvinar, usually dedicated to the Heathen Deities) to [Page 36] Jupiter the Thunderer, for the Health of the Emperor Adrian his Lord’; who languisht a long time before he died, Spart. Hadr. and suffer'd such Agonies of Pain, that he would fain have persuaded his Servant, who attended him, to have run him through; and when that Per­suasive would not prevail, would either have stabb'd or poyson'd himself. So difficult was it for this Great Emperor to breathe his last.

But when Aurelius Antoninus had prevail'd with the Senate to have him Deify'd, and appointed him the Ho­nours properly given to the Gods, with a College of Priests, and Attendants to do the Service of the Temples erected to him at Puteoli, and elsewhere, (which Societies continued to the Reign of Gruter. CCCCVII. 1, 2. CIO­IX. 9. Septimius Severus at Rome; but how long in the Cities of the East, I know not,) and had instituted Publick Games in his Name, (from which Gratitude to his Patron, the Historian says. Au­relius had the Name of Pius given him.)

The Cities of the East, in Imitation of Italy, had their Sodales Hadrianales also (and Temples, questionless, erected to his Memory) of which Samosata is [Page 37]an undemiable Instance, where L. Grut. ubi sup. Fabius M. F. Gal. Cilo, Praefect of the City, was a Fellow of the College of Priests deputed to the Service of the Deisy'd Emperor Adrian; particularly Palmyra, who gratefully commemorated her Se­cond Founder allowed of his Consecra­tion, built him a Temple, and devoted some of her Inhabitants to the Service thereof, as appears by the Inscription in Gruter; Vid. Ap­pend. and by another among those lately publisht, where he is called Adrian the God; and I am apt to be­lieve, that the little Temple mention'd in the Journal, Pag. 104, 105. was erected to his Me­mory, as well as to Jupiter. 5

CHAP. X.

THE City having been repair'd, we may justly suppose, that by the Advantages of its Situation and Trade, and the continuance of a long Peace with the Parthians, not often in­terrupted, (except in the War which Septimius Severus made against them, when he took both Ctesiphon and Babylon, Zosim. l. 1. p. 4. and reduced all Arabia, ha­ving ma [...]cht through that Arabia where the Scenitae pitcht their Tents, in which Country Tadmur lay,) it ar­rived to its ancient Glory, when the Emperor Antoninus Caracalla honour'd it with the Privileges of a Ʋlpian. l. 1. de Censib. Roman Colony Juris Italici (for there was a difference between Colonies, all were not Juris Ita­lici, as Palmyra was,) Colonia Palmyra it is stiled in the Goltz. Thes. pag. 151. Coins of that Em­peror, a Metropolis and a Colony, in the Inscriptions; probably in Honour of his Mother, whom he afterward made his Wife, Julia Domna, who was of this Country; but whether of Emisa (as several Authors affirm) or Palnoyra, [Page 39]or some third City, I am not certain: A Native of Syria we know she was, for so says Spartian. Septim. p. 65. Spartianus; and Oppian her Contemporary, calls her, the (a) Assvrian Venus, and a Moon that was never Eclipst, or in her Wain. The same Poet, in the same place, mention­ing the Destruction of the Parthians, and the Taking of Ctesiphon (as the Coins do mention the Mezob. p. 295. Victoria Par­thica of that Prince) as do also the Historians; in which Expedition, I doubt not but the Palmyrenians, in Gra­titude, Declared for his Interest.

This Honour and Privilege of a Roman Colony, Palmyra kept, in the Reign of Alexander Severus (for un­der him, the great Lawyer Ʋlpian flourisht) and assisted him with their Forces in his Expedition into the East, in the Fisth Year of his Reign, (of which Undertaking. Vit. Al. Severi. pag. 131, 133, 134. Lampridius gives so august a Character; though Herodian upon this, as upon all other occasions, [Page 40]lessens, and would obscure the Atchieve­ments of that excellent Prince. In this Expedition, Journal, p. 97. Aurelius Zenobius being, as I conjecture, the Commander of the Forces of the Republick of Palmyra, attended, and was an unwearied Assistant to Rutilius Crispinus, the Roman Ge­neral, Vid. Ap­pend. and discharg'd the Offices of a Man of Conduct and Courage against the Persians, and deserv'd the most ample Testimonials of his Bravery and Prudence.

But Palmyra never arrived to such an illustrious pitch of Glory, as it did under Odenathus and his Sons, who establisht it the Seat of the Eastern Em­pire, and beautified and strengthned it accordingly; and for a few Years it afforded as remarkable Transactions of War and State, as any other part of the World can boast of, in so short a space of Time: And therefore I shall give my self the liberty to treat more largely of these Affairs, and to deduce the Series of the History of the Imperial Family of Palmyra, as far as the An­tients afford us light, and shall leave the judicious Reader to his choice, what Memoirs he will give most credit to,

ϹΕΠΤ ΖΗΝΟΒΙΑ ϹΕΒ

L Ε

IMP C HERODIANVS AVG

SALVS AVGVSTI

ΑΥΤ. Κ. ΔΟΜ. ΑΥΡΗΛΙΑΝΟϹ ϹΕΒ.
L Β

ΟΥΑΒΑΜΑΘΟϹ ΑΘΗΝΟΥ ΑΥΤ. ΕΡΜΙΑϹ
L Ε

[Page]

ϹΕΠΤΙΜΙΑ ΖΗΝΟΒΙΑ ϹΕΒ

L Ε

IMP C AVRELIANVS AVG

VABALATHVS VCRIM DR

ΑΥΤ. Κ.Λ.Δ. ΑΥΡΗΛΙΑΝΟϹ ϹΕΒ.
L Α

ΟΥΑΒΑΜΑΘΟϹ ΑΘΗΝΟΥ ΑΥΤ. ΕΡΜΙΑϹ
L Δ

having taken care in every Paragraph to produce my Vouchers; while I bemoan heartily the loss of Ʋranius his ( [...]) Arabick History, in the Second of which Books he treated of Palmyra; as also of Domninus of An­tioch, whom Malela commonly fol­lows; and of Philostratus of Athens, the Historiographer, who liv'd under Aurelian, and wrote the Transactions of his own Time: but particularly I regret the want of that Oration which Longinus made in Praise of Odenathus, and called by his Name, of which Li­banius makes mention in his Epistles, which would questionless have given a more ample History of that Illustrious Prince, than all the jejune Narratives of the Roman Historians. But since we must follow the Light that is given us, I shall first begin with Odenathus, then treat of Zenobia, and their Chil­dren.

CHAP. XI.

ODENATHƲS (says Lib. 7. cap. 22. Orosius) was a Man of mean Birth and Original, ( Odenathus Quidam, as he stiles him:) A Man of Palmyra (says Ʋbi Infr. Zonaras:) Of no Reputation, and unknown (says Lib. 4.134. Agathias,) till he made his Name Famous by his Con­quests over the Persians, and other eminent Atchievements, which give him an extraordinary Character in the ancient Historians. Breviar. Sextus Rufus says, that he was a Decurio of Palmyra; which being a word of large significa­tion, may in that Author, I think, be render'd a Procurator, or Senator: And so he is stiled in the Pag. 88. Ibid. P. 99. Inscriptions, if he be the same Person, Septimius Ode­thus, the Most Illustrious Senator, the Son of Airanes Nephew of Vaballathus; of which Order also his Son Septimius Aira­nes was. And L. 1. p. 36. Zosimus says expresly, that his Ancestors were Men of Honour and Condition, having been in past Ages enobled by the neighbouring Kings. Pag. 382. Georgius Syncellus calls him a [Page 43]great Soldier, and probably he was the General of the Forces of the Com­monwealth of Palmyra: A Prince (says Pag. 192. Pollio) accomplisht in the Art Military, and from his Youth a great Hunter, (Hunting being in those days, according to the most ancient Practice, the Recreation and Exercise of the most Eminent Persons, a Sport that bred them to great Hardiness and Resolution, and much Experience in War,) he be­stowed his leisure hours in destroying Lyons, Leopards, Bears, and other Beasts of Prey, inuring himself to bear the Fatigues of Labour, to endure the Hardships of Heat, and Showers, and the other Toils incident to a Wood­man's Life; and by these Methods brought himself to a Habit of enduring the scorching Beams of the Sun, and the annoyance of the Dust, in his Wars with the Persians.

The later Greeks frequently stile him the King of the Saracens, of the Bar­barous Saracens, as if he had been a Phylarchus of some part of Arabia: Lib. 23. cap. ult. Ammianus averring, that those who were anciently called Arabes Scenitae, were afterwards called Saracens, (but [Page 44]herein he differs from both Pliny and Ptolemy:) A Name (says Scaliger) never used by any Author before Pto­lemy; whereas Pliny, who liv'd at least fifty Years before that excellent Astro­nomer, expresly mentions them. Now the Saracens, over whom Odenathus and Zenobia reign'd, had been of old, says Procopius Confederate with the Ro­mans.

And as the Quality of this Mighty Prince hath been mistaken, so have his Actions been wrongfully represented: Orosius affirming, that he form'd an Army of the Boors of Syria, and with those Rusticks overcame the Persians; and so says Sextus Rufus. But they confound two Stories, if we may credit Par. 1. p. 391, &c. Malela; for he affirms, that when Sapores had over-run all Syria, and had taken, plunder'd and burnt Antioch (which happen'd in the 314th. Year of the Aera Antiochena, the 12th. of the Reigns of Valerian and Gallienus,) he afterward ravaged all the East to Emesa, a City of Phoenicia Libanesia, carrying with him, whither soever he went, Fire and Sword, and all the In­struments of Cruelty: but when he [Page 45]came to Emesa, Sampsigeramus the Priest of Venus, having collected a hasty Army of the Country-men of that Pro­vince, placed himself in the Head of them in his Priestly Habit; which created him Respect from all who saw him, particularly from the King of Persia, to whom he said he was sent an Empassador: Upon which, while the King was discoursing him, one of the Boors threw a Stone from his Sling, and hitting Sapores in the Forehead, slew him; whereupon the Army be­lieving that the Romans were falling on their Camp, left all their Booty, and fled, Sampsigeramus pursuing them; and that while the scattered Persians were making their escape, Enathus a Confederate of the Romans, the King of the Barbarous Saracens, and Lord of that part of Arabia, met them upon the Borders, and destroy'd the remainders of that scatter'd Army, as Domninus the Chronologer of Antioch affirms, to whom Malela gives credit; while Philostratus the Historian (as the same Malela confesses) who liv'd a Con­temporary with those Princes, gives a different Account; That after Sapores [Page 46]had made such great Devastations in Syria, had ravag'd Cilicia and burnt all her eminent Cities, ( Domninus says, the King went not in Person, but sent Spates his General with an Army to commit those Outrages,) as he was returning through Cappadocia into Per­sia, Enathus the King of the Saracens came forth to meet him, and pay the Respects of a Confederate, and at length slew him. But to set the History in its true Light, it will be requisite to take a short View of the State of the Empire at that time.

CHAP. XII.

THE Roman Interest in the East having been sinking for some years after the Death of Gordianus, un­der his Successor Philip, who was also his Murtherer, as also under Decius, Gallus, and Aemilianus; Valerian, and his Son Gallienus, were chosen to wear the Purple; the Persians in the mean time ravaging the East, as the Scy­thians over-ran and pillag'd the rest of the Empire.

This Devastation continued for some years, till at last Valerian marcht against the Scythians, who had taken Chal­cedon, burnt the City of Nice, and pil­lag'd and set fire to the famous Temple of Diana at Ephesus; and after that, he attempted to drive the Persians out of their New Conquests, Anno Christi, 260, but very unfortunately; for having engag'd his Troops in those vast De­sarts, where the Rays of the Sun were very fervent, and few places afforded Water sufficient for an Army, and Forage and Provisions must be brought [Page 48]from a great distance, Valerian sent Embassadors to Sapores, Eclogae Le­gat. Petii Patricii, p. 29. loaden with Gold, to buy a Peace: But the cruel and crafty Monarch knowing the neces­sitous Condition of the Roman Army, and being incens'd, that Valerian, in his Letters, had not treated him with all the Pompous Titles which the Per­sians Kings used to assume to them­selves, detain'd the Embassadors for a while in Prison, till he had gotten all his Forces in a readiness to March, and then dismist them, Zosim. l. 1. p. 32. with this Answer, That if Valerian would give him a Meeting, they would agree upon Ar­ticles among themselves, that should be for the Common Good of both Em­pires. To this Meeting, Valerian, prest by the Necessity of his Affairs, very imprudently assented: but as he was pursuing his Journey, accompanied only with a few Attendants, he was seiz'd on by the Persian Soldiers, and made a Prisoner; Sapores using him with all rigour and contempt, setting his Foot on his Neck every time he mounted his Horse, till after some years he flea'd him, and so put an end to his miserable Life.

In this Expedition, Odenathus, (who, during the Reigns of Decius, Trebo­nianus, Gallus, and Volusianus, while the Persians had seiz'd and pillag'd Me­sopotamia, Syria, and the adjacent Pro­vinces, had probably join'd himself to to the Conquering Party, and acknow­ledg'd the Jurisdiction of the Persians, not being able, alone, and unassisted, to oppose so great a Power,) seeing the Roman Emperor engaged in Person in the Head of a puissant Army for the recovery of the East, and knowing that his Ancestors had received many signal Favours from the Emperors, Predecessors to Valerian, was easily persuaded to declare for the Roman In­terest. But when Valerian was taken Captive, Odenathus bethought himself, and endeavour'd to make his Peace, having found the Persian Monarch so much Superior to the Roman. Where­upon, being convinced of the necessity he was under to smooth the Mind of that haughty Prince, he form'd an Em­bassie, loaded several Camels with most noble Presents, especially of such things which Persia did not produce, and sent them to Sapores with the most submis­sive [Page 50]Letters, affirming, That in the whole War he had not been an Enemy to that Great King. But the proud Persian commanded his Servants to throw the Presents into the River, and tearing the Letters, he trampled them under his Feet, expressing himself in an angry Tone to this purpose, Who is this insolent Man, and from whence, that he dares write his Letters to his Liege Lord and Sovereign? If he intends to alleviate his Punishment, let him come hither with his Hands tied behind his Back, fall at my Feet, and beg my Par­don; but if he refuses, let him know, that I will destroy him and his Family, and ruine his Country.

What effect this sharp Answer had upon the Prince of Palmyra, we want Information; but I doubt not, he dis­sembled his Resentment, made the best Terms he could for himself, and waited an Opportunity to revenge the Injury; which, in a few years offer'd it self, when Gallienus gave him his Commis­sion to insult the Persians.

To support the Opinion, That Ode­nathus was was an Ally, if not a Sub­ject of the Persians, before Valerian [Page 51]attempted the recovery of the East out of their hands, Trebellius Pollio affirms, That when Cyriades pretended to the Empire, he robb'd his Father of a vast Summ of Silver and Gold, and with it fled to the Persians; and having insi­nuated himself into the Affections of Sapores, and entred into a Confederacy with him, incited him to make War upon the Romans, after he had engaged Odenathus in the same Design; that he took Antioch and Caesarea, and made himself, either by downright Force, or the Terror of his Arms, Lord of the East; whereupon he assum'd the Title of Augustus: But when Valerian came into the East, he was slain by his Sol­diers. This Allyance he made with the King of Persia (says Tom. 3. pag. 25. Tristan) in the First or Second Year of Valerian, in the Fourth (says Mezzobarba,) and he reign'd at least two years, say the Goltz. Thesaur. p. 72. Coines. But Salmasius will not al­low, that Odenathus was concerned in this Attempt upon Syria; but Odomastes (perhaps Oromastes) whom he supposes a General, or a Tributary Prince to the Persian; though it is not altogether improbable, but the Prince of Palmyra [Page 52]might be engaged in this Design, not only because in League with the Persian, but also, because being an Ambitious, Politick and Warlike Prince, he was willing to enlarge his Limits, and to take the Advantage of the distracted Estate of the Roman Empire at that time, to make Additions to his own Territories. But when Valerian was marching into the East, and Cyriades was slain, then he bethought himself, and in good time changed his Party, and declared for the Romans: Which enraged Sapores, and gave occasion to him to upbraid Odenathus, when Va­lerian was made Prisoner, with his Apo­stasie from his Duty.

CHAP. XIII.

THE Wings of the Roman Eagle having been thus deplumed, and the Glory of the Empire eclip'st, while Valerian wore the Chains, and daily suffer'd the Insolences of the King of Persia, it might have been with Justice expected that Gallienus should have exerted his utmost Powers to release his Father, and set his Coun­try and Subjects free. But instead of applying himself to such becoming Un­dertakings, which would have given new Life to his People, and new Lawrels to himself, (who had in the beginning of his Reign behaved himself like a Man of Courage and Conduct,) he gave himself up to all manner of Voluptuousness, and permitted the Commonwealth to be shipwrackt, inasmuch as he not only neglected to make an attempt for his Father's Release, (while, by the Bar­barians, the neighbouring Princes, who were Confederate with the Persians, Sapores was sollicited with all earnestness to set him at liberty, and to make a Aurel. Victor. Caess. p. 155. [Page 54]Peace, of which the Letters still ex­tant in Trebellius Pollio are an unde­niable Demonstration; while also the Bactrians, Iberians, Albanians, and Tauroscythae, wrote to the Roman Gene­rals, promising their Assistance to re­deem him out of an ignominious Sla­very,) but suffer'd the Goths, A.D. 261. say the Fasti Idatiani; but Cassiodore says, Anno 263. to over-run all Thrace, Macedon, and Achaia, with the neigh­bouring Provinces, Zosim. l. 1. p. 34. one Party of them ravaging Illyricum, and pillaging all its Cities, another invading Italy, and march­ing to the very Gates of Rome, while the Parthians made their Inroads into. Mesopotamia, and the Syrian Banditti har­rast the East, Aug. Ep. 80. insomuch as the Con­siderate part of Mankind thought the World near its End, (and the sad Effects of those Eruptions were visible, in the Ruines of many a Noble City and Country, almost Two hundred Years after, both in the East and West, says Lib. 7. cap. 22. Orosius,) while every bold Pretender durst set up his Title to the Empire in the West, who could defend his Usur­pation with his Sword; his Father Va­lerian languishing all the while under a [Page 55]severe Captivity, Treb. Pol. p. 175. till his Age and his Afflictions had cover'd him with Grey Hairs.

When the Affairs of the Empire were in this perplext estate, Eutrop. l. 9. §. 10. Treb. Pol. p. 178, 179. and their Inte­rest at the lowest ebb, Gallienus having deserted the Care of the Republick, sauntred away his Time idlely, or spent it ridiculously in the Company of Rope­dancers and Stage-players, and laught at the loss of many a fertile and rich Province; while Posthumus maintained its Grandeur in the West, and preserved Gallia; and Odenathus in the East at­tackt and subdu'd the Persians. For when that senseless Emperor saw him­self so miserably opprest on all hands, awaken'd by the Out-cryes of his People, he for a little while rouz'd him­self out of his Lethargy, and look'd about him; and seeing all at stake, re­quested Odenathus, Zosim. l. 1. pag. 36. Zonar. T. 2. p. 235, 237. the Governor-Gene­ral, or Praetor, of Palmyrene, and Conse­derate of the Romans, (the Prince of that Country, says Trebellius Pollio,) to drive the Persians out of the Roman Territories: Odenathus consider'd, that if he did not interpose, it would be im­possible but that Sapores would in a [Page 56]small time, under so negligent a Prince as Gallienus, have made himself Master of the World, and that his own Native Country must necessarily have been made an Appendage of that Empire; and for this reason, as well as to re­venge the Affront offer'd him in the Slight put on his Embassadors, he join'd his Forces to the remains of the Roman Army, who still continued to support the Reputation of that August Em­pire in the East: And in this diffi­cult Undertaking he behaved himself with so much Address, and such an ex­traordinary Courage, that he humbled the Pride of the Greatest of the Eastern Monarchs in the midst of all his Glory and Triumphs: For he first fell upon the Persian General, and having routed him, recover'd Nisibis and Mesopotamia out of the Hands of the Invaders; then attack't the King of Persia with a Suc­cess suitable to his Bravery; Philostr. ap. Malel. par. 1. p. 393. & Zonar. Tom. 2. p. 237. Agath. l. 4. p. 134. for as Sa­pores was returning home, loaden with the Spoils of Syria and Cilicia, Ode­nathus came out to meet him, as one of his Allyes; but under that pretext he deluded him, having way-lay'd him as he past through Euphratesia [Page 57](call'd of old Commagene, says Proco­pius; Augusto-Euphratesia, by Theo­dorit a Bishop of that Country,) so streightned him, that being to march through a Valley whose Ways were too steep and rugged for his Carriages, he slew all his Prisoners, and threw them into the Hollows, and by that means past over his heavy Baggage. After this, he fought and routed the Army of the Persians, and made so great a slaughter of their Troops, that Delega­tionib. p. 45. Peter the Historian, a Man of the Se­natorian Dignity, and Embassador to Chosroes King of Persia, affirms, That when Sapores had past the Euphrates with the remains of his shatter'd Army, his Soldiers thinking themselves secure, by their station on the other side of the River, embraced one another with un­expressible Transports: After which, Sapores sent to the Garrison at Edessa, promising them to give them all the Money which he had plunder'd in Syria, if they would not molest him in his March, but suffer him quietly to hasten Home through their Territory; sub­joyning, that he did not offer them this great Summ, as if he were afraid of [Page 58]them, but that he might make the more speed into Persia, to celebrate a great Festival that he was near, not being willing to be hinder'd in his De­sign. To this the Garrison consented, receiv'd the Money, and gave him leave to pass by the City unmolested.

By this Victory, Odenathus not only preserv'd the Roman Territories in the East, and defended the Limits, but re­cover'd several Cities which the Per­sians had usurpt, and made his Inroads as far as Ctesiphon, the Royal Seat of those Eastern Princes, obliging them to quit their other Conquests, to de­fend their Wives and Children. In this Expedition also he made himself Master of the Treasures of that Great Mo­narch; and of what those Kings held more valuable and more precious than all their Wealth, his Concubines; and at the same time he took many of the Nobility Prisoners. This was so Meri­torious an Action, that the Trib. Pol. p. 192. Roman Hi­storian confesses, That without this In­terposition, the Interest of the Empire had been entirely sunk in the East: And withal, he informs us, That Ode­nathus assumed the Name of King, be­fore [Page 59]he rais'd his Army, (though the Greek Writers allow him to have only been declar'd General of the East, an Honorary Trust conferr'd on none but Persons of the best Condition and Qua­lifications,) that his Wife Zenobia, his eldest Son Herod, and his two younger Sons Herennianus and Timolaus, ac­pany'd him, when ( Anno Christi, 246.) he fought and routed that Potent Mo­narch, and recover'd the Territories that he had usurped on this side the River.

To reward these brave Services, Treb. Pol. p. 180. Gal­lienus declar'd him Augustus, and his Copart'ner in the Empire, (so that the Historians with great injustice reckon Odenathus and his Son Herodian among the Tyrants, as if they had been Usurpers, who ought to have been in­serted into the Catalogue of the Law­ful Emperors,) and commanded Mo­ney to be stamp't in his Name, the re­verse of which represented the Captive Persians following his Triumphant Chariot: The Senate, the City, and all the People of Rome, being wonder­fully pleas'd with the Performance.

This Declaration of Gallienus intitled Odenathus to the Possession of the East, while his illustrious Archievements prov'd him worthy of the Purple: And accordingly, upon his return from Ctesi­phon, he assum'd the Habit and Style, and Declar'd his Son Herodes his Co­part'ner in the Empire, and Princeps Juventutis; as, besides the Historians, the Coins do fully declare.

CHAP. XIV.

Odenathus having thus atton'd for the Negligence of Gallienus, sup­ported the sinking Fortune of that Au­gust Empire, and preserv'd his own Native Country in its own Quiet and Freedom, and behav'd himself with so dextrous an Address, and such an ex­traordinary Courage, that he humbled the Pride of the Greatest of the Eastern Monarchs, and acquir'd a great Repu­tation to his Arms; and having spent some time in settling his new Con­quests, [Page 61](though he fail'd of his main En­terprize of releasing Valerian, who was, upon this Irruption of the Palmy­renians, slain by Sapores,) at the Re­quest of Gallienus, Treb. Pol. p. 192. Zonar. T. 2. p. 237. he undertook to suppress Macrianus, who had, in Op­position to Gallienus, Declar'd himself Emperor in Phoenicia, (though Eusebius avers, that himself did not assume the Purple, but that he made his Sons Em­perors.) and was acknowledg'd by the Roman Army under his Command. But Macrianus having baffled the Scythians, Zonar. Syn­cel. p. 382. Treb. Pol. p. 176. and driven them out of Achaia, was retir'd with his Eldest Son, of his own Name, into Illyricum, where, in a pitch't Battel, they were both slain by Aureolus, another of the Pretenders to the Empire: But Macrianus had left Quietus the Younger of his Sons in the East, with the Title of Augustus, under the Conduct of Balista an Experienced General. Balista was the Praefectus Prae­torio to the Emperor Valerian, a Cap­tain of rare Capacity, and singular Cou­rage, of great Wisdom and Foresight, and as great Resolution and Bravery; he was General of the Horse under Ma­crianus in the East. And when Macrianus [Page 62]that Country, he, with Quietus the Second Son of Macrianus, managed the War with so much Courage and good Fortune, that while he attack't Sapores on one hand, and Odenathus on the other, they drove him to take shelter in the Desarts of Persia; upon which Victory they assumed the Title of Em­perors, which engaged Gallienus against them: Therefore Odenathus march't and fought them at Emesa, where Ba­lista fell by the Sword of Odenathus, Quietus by the Hands of the Citizens of Emesa, says Zonaras; while Trebellius Pollio in one place affirms, Pag. 116. That after the Army was routed, the Soldiers seiz'd both Quietus and Balista, and de­liver'd them to Odenathus, who slew them: Pag. 194. but in another place he says, That the common report was (sew Writers accounting for Balista's Actions, after he was Declar'd Emperor, while they treat more largely of his Per­formances, while he was Praefectus Prae­torio of the East) that he was flain by a Private Sentinel of Odenathus's Army, as he was sleeping in his Tent: but in a third place he affirms, Pag. 176. That the Army of Quietus, instigated by Ba­lista, [Page 63]slew the young Prince, and ha­ving thrown his Body over the Walls of Emesa, immediately surrender'd: Others (as he says) affirming, Pag. 193. That Odenathus having slain Quietus, gave Balista his Life; but that Balista, not daring to trust either Gallienus, Aureolus, or Odenathus, assum'd the Imperial Purple. Nor does the Report want Au­thors, that he was slain at Daphne, near Antioch, at a Farm which he had pur­chased, where helived a private life: while very many others averr, That having Declar'd himself Emperor, he was mur­ther'd by those whom Aureolus sent to apprehend Quietus, whom he deman­ded as part of his Plunder, having slain his Father, and Elder Brother. The Accounts even of those Times being so various, it cannot be expected that the Writers of the present Age should better adjust the History, while we are obliged to the Information of the Coins, Goltz. Thes. p. 72. that Balista reign'd Three Years at least, and that his Name was Servius Anicius (or Sergius Anicetus) Balista. Whatever his Fate was, as to his Titles, he was an Illustrious Person, happy in his Undertakings, and had a [Page 64]singular Faculty in providing his Army with Provisions and Necessaries; and so well vers'd in Politicks, that Vale­rian acknowledged, that he had learn'd the Rules of Government from Balista, and that he was one of the most Provi­dent and most Experienced Generals of the Age. But whether he was that Callistus whom Zonaras affirms to have been chosen by the Roman Troops their General, after the Captivity of Valerian, and who, when he saw the Persians carelesly wandring up and down, as if they had no more Enemies to conquer, fell upon them, and routed them, I will not determine, though it be highly probable, the Names being very like ( Callistus, and Balistas,) and the ex­ploits seem to be the same. But in this one Circumstance Zonaras is mistaken, who attributes the Taking the Baggage and Concubines of Sapores to Callistus, which was the Atchieve­ment of Odenathus.

When Odenathus had thus compleated the Conquest of the East, and wrested it out of the Hands both of the Roman Rebels, and the Persian Usurpers, Treb. Pol. p. 176, 179. he gave an exact Narrative of all his Pro­ceedings [Page 65]to Gallienus, and sent him the Persian Nobility, whom he had taken Prisoners: And that besotted Prince had the confidence to triumph at Rome, for the Victories which Odenathus got in Euphratesia.

Immediately upon this, Sincel ubi sup. Odenathus being a Captain of indefatigable Cou­rage, and great Expedition, engaged himself in the Expulsion of the Goths, who made their Irruptions into Phrygia, Cappadocia, and Galatia, and threatned the East. But having march'd through Cappadocia to Heraclea of Pontus, the Scythians, terrify'd with the Name of the Illustrious General, retired; but as he was preparing to pursue them, he was most unfortunately and most bar­barously murder'd. Treb. Pol. p. 184. The Anger of God against the Roman Commonwealth being most visibly seen; because, after Valerian was slain, he would not reserve Ode­nathus for its Preservation.

CHAP. XV.

THE Manner of Odenathus his Death is differently related, tho' the Historians agree in the main. Ʋbi supr. Malela, (a) after his fabulous wont, affirms, That he was slain by Gallienus. L. 1. p. 36. Zosimus, That while he was at Emisa, celebrating either his own, or some Friend's Birth-Day, he was by Trea­chery murthered. But the generality of Writers assert, That Odenathus, with his Son Herodes, were slain as they were about to pursue the Scythians, who fled before them: That the Parricide who made the Assassination, was his Kinsman, his Brother's Son, Moeonius; whom Syncellus calls Odaenathus (pro­bably according to the Mode of that Time and Country, Moeonius Odae­nathus:) and that he, for a few days after, assum'd the Title of Emperor, [Page 67](as appears by the Coins,) but that he was suddenly dispatcht by those very Soldiers who had been wheadled to cloath him with the Imperial Pur­ple. So fell the most Unjust of Men to his Relations, the most Disloyal Traytor to his Prince, the most Un­grateful Villain to his Benefactor, and the most Profligate of Wretches.

Maeonius was induced to imbrue his Hands in the Blood of his King, Pol. p. 192, 193. Cuspin. Caes. p. 74. his Re­lation, and his Friend; instigated (say some) by Zenobia, who, to dispatch a Son-in-Law, that hinder'd her Children from succeeding to the Empire of the East, (for Herodes, or Herodian, was the Son of Odenathus by a former Wife,) was content at the same time to see her Husband stabb'd. But more probably he committed the execrable Murther, being instigated by the most malicious of Tempers, and an abominable mixture of Envy and Ambition; this prompted him to destroy one of the best of Em­perors, upon the pretext, that his Son Herod was a Man of extraordinary Softness and Delicacy, (as Men who are naturally Kind and Good-natur'd, are apt to be Effeminate. Voluptuous [Page 68]and Amorous,) and because his Father had given him all the King of Persia's Concubines, all his Treasures, and all the Gems taken in the War: Or rather, upon an old Grudge; Zonar. T. 2. p. 237. for the fierce Young Man accompanying his Uncle in his Manly Exercise of Hunting, pre­sum'd, the first of the Company, to throw his Javelin at the Wild Beast that was rouz'd; and being reproved for it by his Uncle, that Honour being reserv'd for the most Eminent Person of the Hunt) in contempt of the Re­primand, persisted to gratifie his own Humour, and committed the same Crime a second and a third time: Whereupon, Odenathus ordered him to be dismounted, and his Horse taken from him, (which was the greatest Af­front that could be offer'd to a Man of Quality in that country.) Upon this, the hot Spark could not forbear expres­pressing his Resentments, and threatning Revenge. Whereupon he was confin'd: but in a little time, at the Intercession of Herodes, Odenathus set him at li­berty. But the Pardon was as uneasily digested as the Affront, (the injur'd Person may be inclined to remit the [Page 69]Offence; but he who does the Wrong, never forgives;) for he watch't his Opportunity, and imbru'd his Hands in the Blood of both his King, and his Advocate.

Thus fell that Great Prince and his Eldest Son, both Emperors, after Ode­nathus had Reigned Four Years, (and Herodes at least Three, as the Coins expresly prove; it being probable, that Odenathus wore the Purple some time after Gallienus declar'd him Em­peror, before he assum'd Herodes to be his Copartner in his Government,) leaving his Crown and Scepter by Right to his Grandson Vaballathus, Vid. Ap­pend. but in the Possession of, and de Facto to Ze­nobia, and her Sons Herennianus and Timolaus.

CHAP. XVI.

O Denathus was murther'd the same Year that Gallienus was slain, but some time before him. For, Anno Christi 260, Valerian was taken, in the Sixth Year of his Reign; after which, the Persians managed the Af­fairs of the East according to their own Will and Pleasure. Valerian's Son, and his Copart'ner in the Empire, Gallienus, being lost in the mazes of his Vices, and so devoted to his Pleasures, that his Name was not so much as mention'd in the Army, who seem'd to have for­gotten him, as entirely as he had for­gotten himself, and all Princely Qua­lifications; for he rejoyc'd at his Fa­ther's Captivity, which clad all Rome in Mourning, and cover'd every Wise Man with Tears; and diverted him­self with Stage-plays, Treb. Pol. p. 176, 182. Horse-races, and the Combats of the Gladiators; in making himself Beds of Roses to wallow in, in the Summer-time; and Beds of Melons, to gratifie his Palate in the Winter; in building Castles of Apples, [Page 71]and other Fruits, and exercising his noble Courage in attacking them; in finding out Methods how to Preserve Grapes Sound and Untainted three Years, and Wines always in the Muste, Figs always Green, and Apples Ripe in every Month in the Year; as if he had been born a Slave to his Belly and his Pleasures. He spent all his time in Riot and Luxury, in Wine and Women; never would drink, but out of a Golden Bowl (despising Glass, because com­mon and cheap,) and every time chang'd his Wine: his Concubines sate at the same Table with him; and at the next Table to him, his Buffoons, Parasites and Jesters. His Cloaths were foreign, and different from the Habit of the Roman Princes his Predecessors; his Hair powder'd with Gold, and his Head crown'd with Rays; while his most intimate Privy-Counsellers were the Roman Ladies. And in this disso­lute Course he lived till the Year of Christ, 264. when Odenathus undertook and revenged the Quarrel, and baffled and put to flight the formidable Host, In which Year, it is very probable, the Persian King, enraged at his loss of [Page 72]Honour, Spoils, and Conquer'd Terri­tories, put Valerian to Death. Anno 268, Odenathus was murther'd, and the same year Gallienus was slain. For thus the Treb. Pol. p. 184. Historian states his Accompts of Time: ‘Whereas Valerian and his Son reign'd Fifteen Years, in the Sixth Valerian was taken Prisoner by the Persians; after which, Gal­lienus reign'd Nine Years, some say Ten: For its certain, that he cele­brated his Decennalia at Rome; and after that, overcame the Goths, made a Peace with Odenathus, an Agree­ment with Aureolus, and overcame Posthumus and Lollianus. — After which, he was slain near Milan, by the Hand of Cerronius (or Cecropius) the General of the Dalmatian Troops.

What the Quarrel was between Gal­lienus and Odenathus, and upon what Reasons, no Historian, that I know of, gives any Account: but perhaps the Coins hint it; for in those of Gallienus, Anno Christi 266, a year and more be­fore Odenathus was murthered, there often occurs Pax Augg. Concordia Augg. (with two Right Hands joined.) 'Tis true, Mezzobarba understands the In­scriptions, [Page 73]of the Union between Gal­lienus and the junior Valerian; but be­sides that Valerian was not Emperor till the next year after those Coins were stampt, Anno Christi 267, as Mezzo­barba himself confesses, we never read of any Dispute between them; for the Younger Valerian was a Prince of ex­cellent Temper and Modesty; but a Quarrel there was between Odenathus and Gallienus (as Trebellius Pollio says expresly.) Much less can I interpret the Coins to have relation to Valerian the Father, as Monsieur Patin does; for long before this year, Valerian was a Prisoner in Persia, and probably mur­thered.

It must be confest, that there is great variety of Opinions concerning the Age of Valerian; and that it is very difficult to adjust the precise time of his Death, which happen'd at so great a distance from Rome, and in a Country at open War with the Em­peror, which precluded all Communi­cation. But I shall endeavour to fix the Time. Tom. 3. pag. 1. Monsieur Tristan says expresly, That Valerian was born An. V.C. 937. Anno Christi 185; and [Page 74]that he was murthered an. aet. 75, Christi 260, the very year in which he was made a Prisoner. But the whole Assertion is precarious, and built upon the wrong Supposition, That he lived but 75 years, and was flea'd the very year in which he was taken.

Signior Mezzobarba affirms, that he was slain an. aet. 77. but fixes no year either from the Building of Rome, or from our Blessed Saviour's Birth. The Writers of the Imperial History of those Times say only in general, that he lived to a great Age in the state of Cap­tivity: While the Writer of the Chro­nicon, commonly call'd the Alexan­drian, allows him to have lived but 61 years; but expresly affirms, that he reign'd 14 years, and that he was put to death by the Persians when Claudius and Paternus were Consuls, Anno Christi 268/9.

Most of the Old Fasti averr, that Valerian and Gallienus reign'd 15 years; and so does Trebellius Pollio; and that Valerian was taken by the Persians, Gallieno 7. & Sabinillo Coss. Anno Christi 266. (as Idatius declares.)

Among all which Writers, there [Page 75]is great Variety, but little Truth; while its plain to me, that Valerian was alive when Odenathus first took Arms for his Release (and so could not be put to Death the same year in which he was taken.) Pag. 179. Trebellius Pollio ex­presly affirming, that Odenathus exerted his utmost Vigour; and attended to nothing else but that Valerian might recover his Liberty. And the same Author as expresly avers, Pag. 184. that Valerian was dead before Odenathus was mur­thered: The Anger of God (as he says) appearing visibly against the Roman Commonwealth, in that after Valerian was slain, he would not suffer Odenathus to live. I am therefore of the Opinion of the learned Monsieur Patin, Pag. 405. that as soon as Sapores had experimented, to his cost, the Bravery and Conduct of the King of Palmyra, and understood that his Design was to restore the Cap­tive Valerian to his Liberty, from an ignominious Slavery; then his Rage transported him to that barbarous and inhumane Act of Cruelty, A. C. 264; and if we may credit the Coin in Golt­zius, he was Deify'd after his Death. Thesaur. p. 70. But enough of this Digression; let us return to Zenobia.

CHAP. XVII.

SEptimia Zenobia (for so she was call'd, and for the knowledge of her first Name we are wholly obliged to the Coins) being thus left by her Husband the Empress of the East, (for as she follow'd him in all his Wars, so she accompany'd him in his Expedition against the Goths, when he was assassi­nated at Heraclea,) and acknowledg'd to be so by the Army (after they had dispatch't her Ephemerous Competitor Maeonius, a Man of the loosest Man­ners, profuse Luxury, and an ungo­vernable Temper) managed that vast Empire with a Bravery and Conduct truly Heroick, and above her Sex; and by the Assistance of the wise Mi­nisters and Generals Odenathus left her, kept up the Reputation of her Government, and advanc'd it. She was Prudent and Fair, Learned and Stout; as rigorous as a Tyrant, to those who were perverse and obstinate; but humane and kind to all who were ready to live under Laws and Disci­pline. [Page 77]She surpast even her Husband, who was one of the most Illustrious Personages in the World, in Courage, Magnanimity, and every generous Quality. In a word, she was an addroit Accomplish't Lady, who had all the transcendent Qualities that would create her the Esteem of the World, and render her worthy the Noblest Throne upon Earth, being of High Birth, Extraordinary Accomplish­ments, and the Greatest Performances.

Her Original was Noble, Treb. Pol. p. 196, 198, 200. and the best Blood of the Egyptian Kings flow'd in her Veins; for she deriv'd her self from the Family of the Ptolemy's, and from Cleopatra; and had a great Re­gard for the last Queen of Egypt, whom with Dido and Semiramis she celebra­ted, as the Heroins of their several Ages; Zenobia particularly proposing to her self the Imitation of all Cleopatra's Illustrious Qualifications, while she avoided those Vices that eclip'st her Glory. Her Mother's Name we are ignorant of, but her Father was Achil­leus (Zozimus calls him Antiochus) whom the Palmyrenians chose to be their Prince, Vopisc. p. 219. when they took Arms [Page 78]against Aurelian. To him, Zosimus says, that Aurelian gave his Life and Liberty, after he had made him his Prisoner. Nor is it the most unpardo­nable Conjectures, to imagine that he was the Father of Lucius Epidius Achil­leus, who twenty years afterthe Sack of Palmyra, being made Governor of Egypt, took upon him the Im­perial Purple, and maintained his Pre­tensions for six years at the least, as the Coins expresly inform us; and at last, after he had been besieged eight Months in Alexandrid, was overcome by Dio­clesian and Galerius, and put to death.

Her Beauty was as Illustrious as her Birth, Id. p. 192. but Manly and August, not Soft and Effeminate; Cornelius Capitolinus affirming, that she was the Handsomest of all the Eastern Ladies, (though Syria were famous for Beauties, more than one of the Roman Empresses owing their Birth to that Country:) Her Face was of a Brownish colour, Pag. 199. (and 'tis no wonder that she appear'd so at Rome, who in Palmyrene had been inur'd to march in the Head of her Army, on foot, several miles at a time, where the Rays of the Sun were so servent and so [Page 79]troublesom.) Her Eyes Black and Sparkling, her Mien Divine, her Charms Irresistable; her Teeth of such an ex­traordinary Whiteness, that some Men thought them Pearls: Her Voice Clear and Masculine: And all her Shapes Re­gular and Lovely.

And with her Beauty, she had Youth and Vigour; for after her Captivity, she was marry'd at Rome, and there had Children by a Man of the Senatorian Dignity.

But all the Symmetry of her Face, and the Beauties of her Mien, were not fit to stand in competition with the more ravishing Accomplishments of her Mind.

CHAP. XVIII.

HEr Ancestor Cleopatra was a Lady of great Wit, Plut. M. Anton. p. 1698. & pass. edit. Steph. and many Lan­guages; so that she seldom made use of an Interpreter, but her self answered all Foreigners that petition'd her in their own Languages, Aethiopians, Troglo­dytes, Jews, Arabs, Syrians, Medes and Parthians; whereas her Predeces­sors hardly understood the Speech of their own Country, the Greek and the Coptick; and all this variety was re­commended by a charming Delivery; her Words flowing with a delicate Sweetness, intermixt with a becoming Raillery: The several Languages which she spake, were like the several Notes of a well-tun'd Lute; every thing that she said, was harmonious, and gave a new pleasure to all who heard her. And in this Qualification Pol. p. 199. Zenobia strove to imitate that Great Lady; she had some knowledge of the Latin Tongue, but out of Modesty used it not: but she spake Greek, and the Language of Egypt, in perfection: And [Page 81]so well skill'd was she in the Alexan­drian and Oriental Histories, that she is said to have written an Epitome of them; and she was also acquainted with as much of the Roman Affairs, as were treated of in Greek. And though she understood other Tongues more accurately than the Latin, and thought it not worth her while to be a Critick in it; yet she commanded her Sons to inure themselves to the Language of Rome, rather than that of Greece, (which they spake but seldom, and with some difficulty,) designing them probably, in her ambitious Thoughts, for the Go­vernment of that proud City, as she had already declared them Emperors; to which end she had provided her self of a pompous Chariot, in which she intended to have made her trium­phant Entry into the Capital of the World, as a Conqueror; while it hap­pen'd that she was carry'd in the same Chariot a Captive into that haughty City. Vopis [...]

And as she was very Learned her self, so she became a declared Patroness of Arts, and a Favourer of Scholars. Longinus (the best Critick of the Age [Page 82]he liv'd in, and perhaps of any Age, and a Philosopher of unquestionable Re­putation) fix'd his Residence at the Court of this Heroick Empress, was admitted to a share in our Councils, taught her Greek, and was probably made the Governor of her Sons: And, could Longinus have persuaded Porphyry, whom by Letter he earnestly invited to Palmyra (with the Queen's Allow­ance, I doubt not) that admirable Pla­tonist had tasted of her Bounty, as did Paulus of Samosata, and other Votaries of Learning in that Age.

Id. p. 198. Sec. Sat­rectionem. Her Magnificence went an equipage with her Learning and her Charms. From the Coins it appears, that she took the Name of Augusta, managing the Empire not only in her Son's Name (as the Historian says) but in her own: And while Gallienus was sauntring in Rome among Fidlers and Players, she kept the State of a Persian Monarch; and to perpetuate her Memory, she built a City on the Banks of the River Euphrates, toward the West, five Miles from the Castle of Mambri, nearer to the Roman Territories, but three Days Journey from Circesium, which she [Page 83]call'd by her own Name, Zenobia; which, Proeop. Pers. l. 2. c. 5. p. 97. & de Ae­dific. l. 2. c. 8. p. 42, 43. when in after Ages it fell into decay, was repair'd, fortify'd and beautify'd by Justinian; and the Place where the Emperor Aurelian gave her a House at Tivoli, thought it self happy to change its old Name for that of this magnifi­cent Princess.

Her Court was pompous, her Gran­deur eminent, she was ador'd like the Eastern Kings, and her Treats were as splendid as any of those made by the Roman Emperors. She usually wore the Royal Robe, and a Diadem; but when she made a Speech to her Army, she put on a Helmet, and appear'd like a second Pallas. Her Cimar was of Purple trimm'd round the Edges with rich Gems, and clasp'd in the middle with a large sparkling Diamond, instead of a Button; her Arm being often bare.

At her Feasts she was serv'd in Gold Plate, enchast with Precious-stones, after the manner of Cleopatra; and chose to be attended rather by elderly Eunuchs, than Women. And the part she bore in the Triumph of Aurelian (than which Rome never saw any thing [Page 84]more Pompous) though it demon­strated her great Misfortune, yet was suited to her magnificent Temper; for she was loaded with Gems of the greatest Magnitude and Value, pro­bably the Spoils of her own Cabinet; which, though she were a Lady of a vigorous Constitution, much incom­moded her, during the Cavalcade. Her Feet and Hands were chain'd with Golden Fetters; and her Necklace was a massie Gold Chain, the end of which was held up by a Persian Buffoon.

She was Chaste to a Miracle, (and in this she differ'd from her Ancestor the Queen of Egypt, whose Lewdness blemisht her other Accomplishments,) inasmuch as she never enjoy'd her Husband's Com­pany, but for the sake of Children; and as soon as she found she had Con­ceiv'd, she retir'd, according to the Custom of the Jews, of whom P [...]ag. l. 2. c. 12. Clemens of Alexandria gives the same Cha­racter.

And in the midst of all her Plenty, her Temperance was admirable, being always sober; though sometimes she used to drink with her Captains, to [Page 85]ingratiate her self to them; and at other times, with the Armenians and Persians, the better to dive into their Secrets.

Upon all Occasions she was very Li­beral, and yet managed her Largesses with great Prudence; and took more care of her Revenues, than most Mo­narchs usually do: And this appear'd by the vast Summs found in her Cof­fers, when she fell into the Hands of Aurelian.

CHAP. XIX.

ZEnobia's Religion was at first Pagan; Phot. Cod. [...]. pag. 802. Gr. but she forsook the Hea­then Polytheism, and became a Jewess, by whose Persuasions, I know not, (for Philastrius was certainly in a Dream, when he aver'd, That Paulus of Samo­sata, Bishop of Antioch, being a Ju­daizing Christian, and a Teacher of the Necessity of Circumcision, and other Mosaical Rites, persuaded her to turn Jew: Nor can I acquit Monsieur Tristan [Page 86]of Inadvertency, Tom. 3. p. 203. when he quotes Pho­tius, That Odenathus also quitted the Idolatry in which he had been bred, and turn'd Jew probably upon the Per­suasions of his Wife; and that there is reason to believe, that both of them were converted by Paulus of Samosata to Christianity; for all that he says, is without Authority, and groundless.) But notwithstanding her Religion, she behav'd her self with great Temper and Meekness towards the Christians her Subjects, neither endeavouring to com­pell their Consciences, nor to seize their Churches. She was a Hater of Perse­cution, though she were a New Con­vert, (and such Persons are generally very warm, and acted by an extraor­dinary Zeal,) and though she was of a Religion whose Proselytes have al­ways been Haters of all who differ from them in Principles; for Epist. ad Solitar. St. Athanasius says, That she was so Just to the Chri­stians, as not to convert their Churches into Synagogues.

It is the common Opinion, Niceph. l. 6. c. 27. that she was in a fair way to have embrac'd Christianity, if she had faln into good Hands; that Paulus of Samosata, the [Page 87]Patriarch of Antioch, undertook the Province, and took great pains therein, ( Zenobia being an excellent Disputant, and admirably skill'd in Controversie,) but having unhappily fallen into the Heresie of Artemon, he infus'd into her Mind very mean Notions of our Blessed Saviour, That he was a meer Man, and not of the same Nature with God the Father; and that this occasion'd his Deposition, and probably the loss of his design'd Disciple. But it is al­most indisputably certain, that all this fair Story is built on a Mistake of the words of Theodorit, who only says, That Paulus fell into the Heresie of Ar­temon; Lib. 2. de Haerisib. n. Paulus. and affirm'd, That our Saviour was only a meer Man; by this means designing to ingratiate himself with, and to flatter Zenobia, Vid. Vales. in Euseb. l. 7. c. 30. who was a Jewess, and so would not allow Jesus to be God.

It is plain from the Ecclesiastick Hi­storian, that she had a great regard for Paul, that she made him her Ducenarius, or Procurator at Antioch; and that he affected rather to be called by that Title, than that of Bishop, being a haughty Man, and a Lover of Secular [Page 88]Grandeur; but for his Heresie, and his vain and disallowable Morals, he was condemn'd by a Synod at Antioch, Euseb. l. 7. c. 28, 29. Anno Christi 166, and the 12th. Year of Gallienus, in which year Dionysius Bi­shop of Alexandria died: But the proud Patriarch, supported by his powerful Patroness, despised the Determination of the Synod. Whereupon, the Ca­tholick Prelates, after Aurelian, the de­clar'd Enemy of Zenobia, had assum'd the Purple, call'd a Second Synod, de­pos'd the Heretick, and fill'd the See with Domnus, Son of his Predecessor Demetrianus: But though Condemn'd by two Synods, the Heretick main­tain'd his pretended Title to his Juris­diction, and kept the Possession of his Episcopal Palace and Revenues, though his Throne were possess'd by a more Orthodox Prelate. Whereupon, the Synod appeal'd to Aurelian, who or­der'd Paul to be Ejected by the Secular Power. So well affected was that Em­peror towards the Christian Church at that time, tho' afterwards he chang'd his Behaviour. And it is not the most groundless of Conjectures, that Aure­lian was so ready to serve the Orthodox [Page 89]against the Heretick; because Paul was a Favorite and Dependant of Ze­nobia his Enemy, while the Catholicks were his Friends, and good Subjects.

CHAP. XX.

AND now, having accounted for her Religion, I shall adventure to describe her Course of Life, and Practises. She used her self to all sorts of becoming Manly Exercise; and shew'd, upon all Occasions, a Hardiness above that of her soft Sex. She often rode on Horse-back, commonly in a Chariot, seldom was carry'd in a Chair, Treb. Pol. p. 192. and very frequently march'd three or four miles on foot in the Head of her Army, having inur'd her self to bear the Fatigues of War, the Scorchings of the Sun, and the parch't Sands of the Desarts: For her Education was like that of her Husband's; and in the opinion of some very good Judges, the [Page 90]Wife was the braver of the two; the most Couragious, as well as the Fairest of her Sex. She often arm'd her Head with a Casque, and as often assisted at her Councils of War; and such an esteem she had of true Magnanmity, that she told Aurelian, That she ac­counted Gallienus and Aureolus Milk­sops, but she esteem'd him qualify'd to make an Emperor of the World; be­cause he was a Stout and Adventurous General. She accompany'd Odenathus in all his Expeditions, and was with him when he so succesfully attempted the Persians.

The Persians, it must be confest, used to carry their Wives with them into the Field, but rather for Show and Mag­nificence, that they might enjoy the pleasure of seeing a fierce Battle fought, and be exempt from all the Hazards of it; but Zenobia went into the Field as a great General, and had her share in the Dangers of the Engagement.

And this part of her August Cha­racter her Enemy Aurelian gave her: 1b. p. 198. For when it was objected to him, That he made a mighty bustle about a Trifle, when he triumph't over an unfortunate [Page 91]Woman: — He told the Senate, ‘That they knew not the Accomplish­ments of that Great Lady; That she was Prudent and Politick in her Councils, and Constant to her Reso­lutions; That she had an entire and undisputed Power over her Army; was very Liberal, when Necessity requir'd; and very Sharp, when Se­verity was requisite; That it was by her Conduct, that Odenathus over­came the Persians, put Sapores to flight, and march't to the Walls of Ctesiphon; That she made all the East, and all Egypt tremble, when neither the Arabs, nor the Saracens, nor the Armenians could affright them; and and that he gave her her Life, upon the prospect that such an extraordi­nary Heroine, who could preserve and manage the vast Empire of the East for her self and Children, would be of great Advantage to the Com­monwealth, and teach the Romans the Rules of Conduct and Govern­ment.’

To make good this Character, and to let the World see how well the Deli­cate Sex might be accomplisht for Rule [Page 92]and Dominion, she told the Emperor, That if she had succeeded in her At­tempt, she design'd to have constituted Victoria, the Wife of Victorinus, ano­ther brave Lady of that Age (who had made more than one Emperor, and took to her self the Title of Augusta, and is stiled in the Coins and Histo­rians, Mater Castrorum) her Companion in the Royal Dignity, and between them they would have divided the Em­pire of the World.

The only Fault which I find her charg'd with (except her Fear, when she fell into the Hands of Aurelian, which prompted her to discover all her Friends and Assistants to that cruel Prince, who presently murther'd them, for in this she fell beneath the Great Cleopatra,) was her dislike of her Son-in-Law Herodes, whom Odenathus had begotten on a former Wife, and that she consented to his murther, that the Empire might devolve on her own Sons, Herennianus and Timolaus. But this is reported by only one Historian; and I cannot believe, that to rid her hands of a Son-in-Law, she would con­sent to the Parricide of her Husband, [Page 93]whom she lov'd so dearly, and who so well deserv'd it; for they both fell at the same time, and by the same Hand. But Diamonds have their Flaws; and the richest Metals, some Alloy.

I have thus endeavoured to set this Heroine in a true Light; for it would not have been just, to treat a Princess of such rare Endowments both of Mind and Body (who was the Ornament of her Sex, and the Wonder of the Age she liv'd in, reverenc'd over all the East, and admir'd even at Rome by her bitterest Adversaries) with a meager and jejune Character, though the best Descriptions, even of the ancient Wri­ters, fall below her Merit. And now I shall proceed to a more particular Ac­count of her Atchievements.

CHAP. XXI.

ODenathus and Herodian being slain, Treb. Pol. p. 180, 197. Zenobia, during the Mi­nority of her two Sons (who were left very young) Herennianus and Timolaus, whom she declar'd Principes Juventutis & Augusti, took upon her the Em­pire, (Monsieur Patin says, Pag. 430. That Gallienus gave her the Title of Empress, but without Proof: but whether it was given her, or she assum'd it, Theodorit and Nicephorus Callisti are much mi­staken, who call her only the Toparch of the Country, and affirm, that she ow'd her Dominion and Territory to the Persians, who having overcome the Romans, gave her the Government of Syria and Phoenice,) and she manag'd it not like a Woman, nor only better than Gallienus, but with more Courage and better Conduct than many famous Em­perors, and gave Gallienus a Specimen of her Abilities, in a few Months after she had undertook to weild her Scepter. For when the News of Odenathus's Mur­ther was brought to Rome, the Emperor, [Page 95]who had some Courage (for he was an odd mixture of Softness and Hardiness) made Preparations of War, though very late, against the Persians, to re­venge his Fathers ignominious and bar­barous Death; and to this end, sent an Army under Heraclianus the Prae­fectus Praetorio, a famous General, and a true Lover of his Country, into the East. But Zenobia, jealous of his De­sign, and resolv'd neither to dethrone her Sons, nor to devest her self of the Imperial Purple, and acknowledge the Roman Authority, met him upon the Borders of Persia, fought him, and routed and destroyed his whole Army. This General Heraclian, Caess. p. 74. Cuspinian calls Herodian, by a great Mistake, affirm­ing, that he was the Governor of Gallia (Dux Galliae;) and that he was op­pos'd by Zenobia, because he made the Expedition into Persia without her Order.

Heraclianus, Zosim. l. 1. p. 37. Treb. Pol. p. 181. upon his return from this unfortunate Expedition, where his Honour had been sacrificed, and his Life with great difficulty saved, ha­ving assisted in the driving the Scy­thians or Goths out of Greece, entred [Page 96]into a Conspiracy with Claudius, the next Man in Dignity and Employment to the Emperor; and having engag'd Cecropius, the General of the Dalmatian Forces, in the Design, they by his Hand slew Gallienus, (this Cecropius, The General of the Dalmatians, Tom. 3. p. 177. Monsieur Tristan believes to be the same Cecrops the Moor, whom L. 1. p. 35. Zosimus affirms to have assum'd the Empire, when Gal­lienus return'd from Germany to Rome, to drive the Scythians out of Italy; and that he was call'd the Moor, be­cause made Governor of Mauritania by Claudius: Whereas Zosimus affirms, that the other Disturbers of that Reign of Gallienus, Cecrops, Antoninus, and the like, were brought to condign Punish­ment by him, only Aurelius survived: And if so, Cecropius in Zosimus could not be the same who murther'd Gal­lienus,) and by a general Consent Clau­dius was declar'd Emperor, who (as Aurelian in his Letters declares) suffer'd Zenobia to Reign quietly, Treb. Pol. p. 199. while he was busied in the Gothick War. And in this he acted very politickly, that that Warlike Lady preserving the Bounda­ries of the Eastern Empire free from [Page 97]Disturbance, he might the more se­curely accomplish his other Designs; and in this Resolution he persisted, Pol. p. 204. though the Senate, when he was elected, cried out five times, O Emperor Clau­dius, deliver us from the Palmyrenians: And again seven times, O Emperor Claudius, rescue us from Zenobia and Victorina. For he was forc'd to ac­knowledge in his Letters, That as Te­tricus had made himself Master of all France and Spain; so the Queen of Palmyra, to their shame be it spoken, was possest of all their Archers.

While the Forces of the Empire were employ'd by Claudius, Zosim. l. 1. p. 39, 40. Pollio, ubi sup. in the First Year of his Reign ( Anno Christi 270, An­tiochianus and Orphitus being Consuls) to compel the Scythians to repass the Danube, and to return to their own Country, (for they had ravag'd Asia and Achaia, Acarnania, Boeotia, Thes­saly, and the adjacent Countries,) Ze­nobia sent her Troops into Egypt, to reduce that fertile Country under her Jurisdiction; the Inhabitants of that rich Province having, upon the News of the Death of Gallienus, unanimously acknowledg'd and taken the Oath of [Page 98]Allegiance to Claudius, though he were absent. This Zenobia resented, as an Injury offer'd to her own Title, and the Succession of her Sons, it being usual for the Junior Augustus, upon the Death of the Elder, to claim the Possession of the whole Empire: Or else she took this occasion to assert her Pretensions to that Kingdom; for she derived her Pe­degree from the Family of the Ptolemy's, and particularly from Cleopatra the last Queen of that Country, whom the Ro­mans had by force dispossest.

To make this Conquest, she sent her General Zabdas into Egypt (where a Party of the Natives, under Timagenes ( Pollio calls him Timogenes) had already declar'd for her Interest, and supported her Claim) who with a powerful Army of Seventy thousand Men, made up of Palmyrenians, Syrians and Barbarians, fought Fifty thousand Egyptians, and after a very sharp Engagement (in which the Militia of Palmyra continued the Fight with unwearied Obstinacy and Pertinaciousness) got the Victory: After which, having left Five thousand of his Soldiers behind him to keep the Country in awe, he return'd to Palmyra.

While this Invasion was made, Probus, whom the Emperor Claudius had de­clar'd the Praefect of Egypt, was, accor­ding to Command, scouring the neigh­bouring Seas of the Pyrates, who, in those times of Disorder, much infested the bottom of the Streights: But as soon as he heard the fatal News, that during his Absence, Egypt had been subdued; he return'd with all speed, forming an Army of what Forces he had with him, and such other of the Natives as were content to List them­selves for the Service, and to throw off the Yoke of the Palmyrenians, which they hated; and making an Attempt upon the Guards whom Zabdas had left to preserve his New Conquest in Obe­dience, he drove them out of the Country.

Upon the Report of this Revolution, Zabdas return'd; but Probus having in the mean time strengthned his Troops with Recruits from Lybia, and the re­moter Parts of Egypt, attack't the E­nemy, got the Victory, and drove the Men of Palmyra a second time out of that Country.

In pursuit of this Victory, Probus possest himself of a Hill near Babylon (the Egyptian City of that Name) that he might preclude Zabdas from retiring into Syria. But Timagenes, who ex­actly knew all the Country, with Two thousand Palmyrenians got to the top of the Hill, unknown to the Egyp­tians, and falling upon them unex­pectedly, cut them all off. Which when their General saw, he, not willing to outlive his Honour, fell on his own Sword.

CHAP. XXII.

EGyt being thus reduc'd under the Power of Zenobia, the remainder of the Barbarians, who outliv'd the Battle fought between Claudius and the Goths, at Naissus, secured themselves within a Tabor of their Waggons, and so made their Retreat: A violent Pesti­lence at the same time raging in both Camps; in which Contagion, Claudius, [Page 101]one of the most Accomplisht of the Roman Princes, breath'd his last. To him Quintillus his Brother succeeded; but hearing that Aurelian was chosen Emperor, he order'd his Physicians to cut his Veins, and so expir'd.

Aurelian having baffled the Scy­thians, and subdued all the Pretenders to the Government, having built the Walls of Rome, and settled the Civil State of that City (which took up the two first Years of his Reign) undertook an Expedition into the East, to reduce Palmyra, which at that time had brought under its Jurisdiction all Egypt, and all the East, home to Ancyra the Metropolis of Galatia; and would have extended its Conquests over Bithynia to the Gates of Chalcedon, if the Inha­bitants, having been made acquainted with the Resolutions of Aurelian, had not emancipated themselves from that Yoke.

Aurelian did not march directly into the East, Vopisc. p. 216. but secured the Provinces through which he went, being forc'd to fight many Battels by the way, be­fore he reach'd Syria. For in Illyricum and Thrace he overthrew the remainders [Page 102]of the Goths, and slew Five thousand of them, with their Commander Can­nabas. After which, he march'd through Byzantium into Bithynia, which had declar'd for his Interests; took Tyana, which was betray'd to him by Heraclammon, but spar'd the City, for the sake of the Philosopher Apollonius, who was born there, while he order'd the Traytor to be executed; all the other Cities between Tyana and Antioch rendring themselves.

Near Antioch, Zenobia had fix'd her station, in the Head of a numerous Army advantagiously posted. But Au­relian was a Prince of Undaunted Cou­rage, a Bold Spirit, and Dextrous Ad­dress; and prepar'd himself, as became a Prudent General, for a Battel: And observing, that the Strength of Zenobia's Forces consisted in her Horse-men, (who were arm'd Cap-a-pée, and better understood Horsemanship than the Roman Troops) he posted his Foot be­yond the River Orontes, in a separate Body, and commanded his Horse not to engage the Palmyrenians while their Body was fresh and lusty; but when they charg'd, to retire, and dissemble a [Page 103]Flight, till the extreme Heat of the Weather, and the Weight of their heavy Arms had tyred them, and forc'd them to desist from the Pursuit. The due Observation of this Order got the Victory: For when the Romans, by this manner of Fighting, had satigued the Palmyrenian Troops, and tyred their Horses, then they charg'd them with the utmost Vigour, and as they fell from their Horses, or their Horses sunk under them, trod them under their feet. The Slaughter was various; some were slain with the Sword, others stifled with the fall of their own Horses upon them, a third sort trampled to death by the Roman Troops, while the scatter'd re­mainders of that great Army fled to Antioch.

This Battel was fought (says Chron. ex vers. Hier. Eu­sebius) in the second Year of the 250th. Olympiad, Anno Christi 273, at (a) Imma, not far from Antioch, [Page 104]and in the Engagement Pompeianus the Frank (whose Family thereupon settled at Antioch, and was in being in St. Je­rom's time, his dear Friend Euagrius being of that House and Lineage) did the Emperor extraordinary Service, and behav'd himself with great Bravery. And it was this Battel, or rather the Shadow of a Battel, says L. 7. c. 23. Orosius, for Zenobia was rather frighted than beaten into Submission) that put that Great Princess into the Hands of the Romans, and decided the Controversie (say Eutropius, and Aurelius Victor.) But they are both mistaken; for Ze­nobia lost her Empire in a much sharper Engagement at Emesa, where her Forces were entirely routed: Of which more in the next Chapter.

CHAP. XXIII.

ZAbdas the General of Zenobia's Ar­my, Zosim. p. 45. a Commander of great Expe­rience, and (till then) as great Success, fear­ing lest the People of Antioch, upon the report of the loss of the Battel, should have fallen upon and insulted the re­mains of his Conquer'd Troops, having found a Man who somewhat resembled Aurelian, clad him in such Habit as that Prince used to wear when he fought, leading him through the Streets of that large City in Triumph, as if he had gotten the Victory, and made the Em­peror his Prisoner.

By this Stratagem Zabdas imposed upon the Citizens of Antioch, and amuzed them the remaining part of that Day, till the Night coming on, he retir'd with Zenobia to Emesa: And thus he deluded the Antiochians, who otherwise would have much in­commoded his Retreat, and escap'd being surpriz'd and ruin'd by Aurelian; for the Emperor had recall'd his Foot from the other side of the Orontes, with [Page 106]an Intention, the next day, to have failen upon the reliques of the Palmy­renian Army on every side: But his Design was frustrated by the flight of Zenobia; whereupon he alter'd his Intentions, and enter'd Antioch, being receiv'd by the Citizens with all the Marks of Zeal for his Service; and was so well pleas'd with the Testimonies of their Repentance and Submission, that he publish'd an Indemnity to the Inha­bitants, and recall'd those who had fled out of fear of being punish'd for ad­hering to the Interests of the Queen of Palmyra.

At this time Aurelian was inform'd, that a Party of the Palmyrenians had posted themselves advantageously on a Hill that overlook'd Daphne, the famous Suburb of Antioch, in confidence that the Steepness of the Place would secure them from all the Attacks of the Ro­mans. But the Emperor commanded his Infantry to draw themselves into their Close Order, and to cover them­selves with their Shields, so to bear off the Darts and Stones that their Ad­versaries might hurl down upon them: And by this method they got an easie [Page 107]Victory, and put all their Enemies to flight; whom the Romans pursued so closely, that some were forc'd to throw themselves off from the Preci­pices, and so were torn in pieces, while the remainder perish't by the Swords of the Victors.

After this, the Cities of Apamea, La­rissa and Arethusa open'd their Gates, and submitted to the Conqueror, re­ceiving him with all the Marks of Ho­nour and Respect. But Aurelian un­derstanding that the Army of Zenobia, and her Allies, being no less than Se­venty thousand Men, were encamp't in the Plain before Emesa, immediately mov'd towards them, and encamp't with his Dalmatian, Mysian and Pan­nonian Horse, with the Legions of No­ricum and Rhaetia, and with his Praeto­rian Bands, who were all select Troops, and tryed Men, in view of the Enemy. Besides these Regiments, Aurelian had in his Army several Troops of Moorish Horse, of the Militia of Asia, from Tyana, and from Mesopotamia, Syria, Phenicia, and Palestine, all choice Men.

When the Armies engag'd, the Ro­man Horse took care not to be enclos'd [Page 108]by the Palmyrenians, who were supe­riour to them in number, and gall'd them very severely, breaking and dis­ordering their Ranks. But as they were about to turn their backs, the Roman Foot charg'd the Enemy's Troops so briskly, that they soon put them to flight. Upon this followed a bloody slaughter, the Jews falling on with their Clubs and Maces, which made a thun­dering and unusual Noise upon the Ar­mour of Brass and Iron in which the Palmyrenians charg'd: The whole Country was cover'd with the Car­casses of Men and Horses, while the few that escap'd, fled to the City.

Zenobia being extremely grieved, as she ought, at her Defeat, deliberated what she should do; and it was unani­mously in Council agreed, That she should desert Emesa (the Inhabitants of the City being her Enemies, and wish­ing well to the Romans) and betake her self to Palmyra, where being more se­cure, she might consult at leisure how to repair her lost Fortunes. This Ad­vice she immediately comply'd with, and fled to Palmyra.

The News of her flight being brought to Aurelian, he entred Emesa in Triumph, cover'd with the Trophies of a noble Victory, and was receiv'd by the Citi­zens with all the Marks of Joy, and ac­cording to the Deserts of an Invincible Hero. At Emesa he seiz'd the Trea­sures of Zenobia, which, by reason of her precipitate haste, she was forc'd to leave behind her, and then with all ima­ginable speed mov'd toward Palmyra. In his March, Vopisc. p. 218. the Syrian Banditti much infested his Camp; for they had, Victor. p. 155. du­ring the Disturbances of the Empire, made themselves very formidable, their Troops being numerous, their Horses fleet to admiration, and the Desarts fa­vouring their retreat with their Prey; inasmuch as at this time it was Prover­bial at Rome, That none but Women and Thieves govern'd the East.

When Aurelian had quitted himself of these troublesom Attendants, he form'd the Siege of Palmyra, straightly beleaguing the City, and fortifying his Camp with Castles, while the neigh­bouring Nations furnisht him with all sorts of Provisions. The Besieged, in the mean time, being possest with a [Page 110]vain Opinion, That their City was Im­pregnable, derided the Attempts of the Romans, as if they must be forc'd, in a few days, to raise their Siege, for want of Necessaries; while the City was well provided with all the requisites of War, the Garrison numerous and brave, and engaged to fight, not, as be­fore, for Glory and Conquest, but for their Wives and Children, and their own Liberties, their All being at stake: For it was beyond the reach of Fancy to imagine (says Aurelian, in his Let­ter to Mucapores) what vast quantities of Arms and Military Stores were in that City; that no part of the Wall was without two or three Engines to throw Darts, and other Instruments of Mischief, into the Enemies Camp; that with some of their Machines they threw Fire among their Tents; and that the Garrison behav'd themselves with so much Resolution, that Aurelian having been wounded with an Arrow, had like to have breath'd his last under the Walls of Palmyra.

CHAP. XXIV.

THis Resolution of the Besieged, join'd to the many Fatigues the Emperor was obliged to undergo, made him almost quite weary of his Design: Whereupon he wrote to Zenobia, re­quiring her to surrender the Place, and promising her and her Confederates, that they should be allowed to live in great Plenty and Security, in such a part of the Empire as the Senate should appoint, upon Condition, that all her Treasure and Arms, her Horses and Camels, should be given up to the Romans; after which, Palmyra should be permitted to be a Free Common­wealth, as it had been in past Ages. But the haughty Queen kept up her Courage, though her Fortunes were sunk, and return'd the Emperor this Answer:

Zenobia the Queen of the East, To the Emperor Aurelian.

NO Man ever yet, except your self, durst demand of me, what your Let­ters require. Whatsoever is to be at­chieved in War, must be gotten by Cou­rage and Resolution. You command me to surrender my self and Empire; but you have forgotten, that Cleopatra chose rather to die by her own Hand, than to lessen and outlive her Grandeur. I am not destitute of Assistance; I daily expect Succours from the Persians: The Sara­cens and Armenians are in my Interests; and the very Free-booters of my Country have already insulted and baffled your Army. When these Auxiliary Troops ar­rive, which I look for from all Quarters, you will abate of your imperious De­mands, though you now require me to yield, as if you had already gotten an entire Conquest, and had made your self Lord of all the East.

This Epistle inflam'd Aurelian, and put him upon doing all that a wise and brave General ought to have attempted, [Page 113]to reduce the City; he intercepted the Persian Succours, and debaucht the Sa­racens and Armenians, whom he cor­rupted by Money, and bought off, till they deserted, according to the Custom of those fickle and changeable Nations, who are true only to their own Inte­rests, and pay their Homage and Ser­vices to that Prince who bids most for them.

When the Garrison heard that all their Relief was cut off, and saw the Emperor bent to carry on his At­tacks with the utmost vigour, being also much prest with the want of Ne­cessaries, they determined to send their Queen over the Euphrates into Persia, to beg the Assistance of that great King; and to this end, they did set Ze­nobia on a female Camel, which sort of Creatures run swifter than any Horse, (others say, on a swift Dromedary,) and convey'd her out of the City.

Aurelian, vex'd heartily that his Enemy had made her escape, dispatch't his Light-Horse to overtake her, who seiz'd on her as she was just embark't, en­deavouring to reach the farther side of the Euphrates, and brought her back [Page 114]to the Roman Camp with mighty Joy and Triumph.

In the mean time, the Garrison was divided in their Sentiments, one Party of them resolving to maintain the Town to the last Man, and to the last drop of their Blood; while others were determined to supplicate the Emperor's Pardon, and to surrender. And this last Opinion prevail'd; whereupon, Aurelian having given his Promise, that they should be indemnify'd for whatever was past, they open'd their Gates, and begg'd the Conqueror's Mercy, who receiv'd them with all Kindness, and took care they should not suffer any damage.

CHAP. XXV.

THus was that proud City, emu­lous of the Glory of Old Rome, reduc'd under the Power of Aurelian, who having possest himself of all the Treasure and rich Moveables of it, re­turn'd to Emesa, and there sate in Judg­ment on Zenobia and her Accomplices. For the Army were ready to mutiny, and petition'd, that she that had been the cause of all their Hardships, should be Executed. But Aurelian, who had a grand Esteem for her Courage, and other Heroical Qualifications, and who could not have forgotten the Merits of her Husband Odenathus, and his great Services, who supported the sinking Empire in the East, and preserv'd it from utter Ruine, thought it beneath the Courage of a brave Man to murder a Woman, one of so rare Endowments, and who had for some years worn the Sacred Purple, in cold blood; and being convinc'd, that it would more contribute to his Glory, to carry her in Triumph to Rome, than to put her [Page 116]to Death in the East, he preserv'd her from the Rage of the incens'd Soldiers; and to satisfie the Mutinous, sharply expostulated with her the Reasons of her Obstinacy, and caused all those to be slain who had engaged her to take up Arms against Aurelian. This oc­casion'd the Execution of many emi­nent Persons, among whom the most learned Longinus met his Fate with great Resolution; and to the last, he bore his Sufferings with a Philoso­phical Courage, and was so far from being affrighted with the Shadows of the Grave, that he comforted his Friends who bemoan'd his Destiny, and convinc'd them, that if this lower World be but one large Prison, he is the happiest Man who is soonest dis­charg'd and set at liberty.

CHAP. XXVI.

THe Affairs of the East having thus been adjusted, Vopisc. p. 219. and the Country left without Disturbance, Zosim. l. 1, p. 55: Au­relian determin'd to return into Eu­rope; but before he could reach Rome, while he was passing through Rhodopa, a Province of Thrace, the Inhabitants of Palmyra, who could not content them­selves with their meaner Circumstances (the loss of their Empire being a con­tinual Affliction) resolved to betake themselves to their Arms, to recover their ancient Grandeur. In pursuit of this Design, they fell upon Sandario, and the Six hundred Archers whom the Emperor had left there in Garrison, and putting them to the Sword, chose Achilleus (the Father of their Captive Queen Zenobia) their Prince. But as soon as the Emperor heard of the Re­volt, being a General of unwearied Diligence and Dispatch, he immediately march'd back into Asia, and utterly de­stroy'd that unhappy City.

This part of the Story Zosimus tells somewhat differently; That the Men of Palmyra, instigated by Apsaeus, who had in former times been a busie Agi­tator among them, attempted to per­suade Marcellieus ( T. Nonnius Marcel­linus, I suppose, who afterwards was Consul in Year of the Emperor Tacitus, Anno Christi 275,) whom Aurelian had constituted his Governor of Mesopo­tamia, and the Praefectus Praetorio of the East, to take upon him the Em­pire. He put them off from day to day; and under the pretext of consi­dering so weighty an Affair, before he determin'd his Resolutions, gain'd time till he had certify'd Aurelian of the Re­volt; but at last he positively refused to take the Purple. Whereupon they chose Antiochus their King, and arm'd themselves in his defence.

Upon the News that Marcellinus sent, the Emperor doubled his March, and in a short time came to Antioch; the Inhabitants, who were busied about their Sports, in seeing the Horse-races, being surpriz'd at his coming; from whence he immediately speeded to Pal­myra, which without fighting he took, [Page 119]and raz'd, giving Antiochus his Life and Liberty, accounting him beneath his Anger.

In the Sack of the City, the Soldiers were surfeited with Blood and Rapine (as Aurelian, in his Letters to Cejonius Bassus, relates) sparing neither Age, Sex nor Quality, involving Women and Children, Old and Young, the Nobility and the Boors in the same common Ruine, till there was hardly left a Man to inhabit the City, or to manure the Ground.

Such a Revenge satiated even the fierce Temper of Aurelian, inasmuch as he he wrote to Cejonius Bassus (or rather Cerronius, according to the old Copies, probably the same Cerronius, the General of the Dalmatian Troops, who slew Gallienus, whom, I conjecture, Aurelian left the Governor of Palmy­rene) to put a period to the Carnage, and to spare the poor remains of that unfortunate City, enjoyning him ex­presly to build the Temple of the Sun (which had been sack't and rifled by the Soldiers of the Third Legion) as mag­nificently as it had been in times past (and by the Ruines of it extant at this Vid. Ap­pend. [Page 120]day, it appears to have been a stupen­dous Building) to the repairing this noble Structure he enjoined him to ex­pend 300 Pound weight of Gold, which he found in the Coffers of Zenobia, be­sides 1800 Pound weight of Silver, which was rais'd from the sale of the Peoples Goods, together with the Crown Jewels, all which he order'd to be sold, to make Money to beautifie the Temple, while himself promises to write to the Senate to send a Priest from Rome to Dedicate it.

After this, Aurelian return'd into Europe without any disturbance, car­rying the unhappy Zenobia his Prisoner with him to Rome, till she became one of the Ornaments of his Triumph; whither I shall follow her, to compleat her Story, when I have briefly con­sider'd the Fortunes of her Associate Firmius.

CHAP. XVII.

WHen Aurelian had put to death all Zenobia's Councellors, Mi­litary Officers, and Associates, and de­stroy'd the City, Marcus Firmius (as the Coins stile him, while the Histo­rians call him Firmus) one of the Con­federates of the Captive Princess, took upon him the Title of Emperor, Vopis. p. 242. and endeavour'd to revenge her Quarrel: He was born at Seleucia, and bred up to all manner of robust Exercises, Na­ture having fitted him with a Gigantick Body qualified for such Undertakings; his Stature was tall to a Prodigy; and his Limbs so firm, that supporting him­self only with his Hands, he could en­dure the Smiths, when they had laid an Anvil on his bare Breast, to smite on it with their Sledges: And propor­tionable to his Strength was his Sto­mach, for he used to eat an Ostrich at a Meal; and could swallow at a sit­ting, though his usual Drink was Wa­ter, as much Wine as two Buckets would hold: He had also amast vast [Page 122]Wealth, having often sent his Ships to trade in the East-Indies, which return'd loaden with all sort of rich Goods, and among other Rarities, two Elephants Teeth of ten Foot long: And of the Products of Egypt, he had in his Ware­house as much Paper and Glew as would maintain an Army. Vid. Sal­mas. in loc. And, that he might keep a Port suitable to his Sta­tion, to his Riches, and his Dignity, he built him a noble and pompous Pa­lace at Alexandria.

Firmius having thus fill'd his Coffers, and provided all things necessary to maintain the Interest he resolv'd to en­gage in, declar'd himself a Friend and Confederate to Zenobia, (nor is it alto­gether improbable that Zenobia consti­tuted him, being a Man of extraordinary Strength and Courage, and Master of a great Estate, her Governor over Egypt, when Zabdas had conquer'd it,) and when that Illustrious Queen fell into her Misfortunes, he enter'd into a League with the Blemmyoe and Sara­cens, and then declar'd himself Empe­ror (as the Coins expresly prove, tho' Aurelian, according to the Custom of that Age, which stiled all Tyrants and [Page 123]Usurpers Thieves, will not allow him a better Title than that of the Egyptian Robber, and though Vopiscus says that he declar'd Egypt a Free State, refusing to assume the Ensigns of Royalty) and having recollected the scatter'd Forces of Zenobia's Army, undertook to sup­port the improsperous Cause, and to defend Alexandria.

But no Power could resist the Genius of Aurelian; for after the return of that great Man from Carrae, Firmius fell a Victor to the Conqueror, and some say, became his own Executioner. But Aurelian himself affirms, that after he had routed his Army, he besieged him in Alexandria, and having taken the City by Storm, he severely cha­stised the Citizens for their Sedition, but Crucify'd their Ephemerous Em­peror (for he did not reign a full Year) which was the usual Punishment to which Thieves were Condemn'd.

From Egypt the fierce and indefati­gable Emperor march'd his Troops to­ward the West, vex'd and angry that Tetricus still maintain'd his Pretensions to the Purple in France; but upon his approach, Tetricus, who could no longer [Page 124]endure nor digest the Insolence of his Legions, gave up his Army to Aure­lian, who having thus quietted the Af­fairs of both the East and West, re­turn'd to Rome with his Captives, which City he resolv'd to enter in State, as the Lord of the Universe.

CHAP. XXVIII.

THe Affairs of Zenobia, after she fell into the Hands of Aurelian, are differently related. L. 1. p. 55. Zosimus avers, that the Victorious Emperor carried her, her Son, and all her Accomplices with him towards Rome, and that it was reported, that she either died of some Disease, or that refusing all man­ner of Sustenance, she starved her self; and that the rest of the Captives, ex­cept her Son, were Shipwrack't, and drown'd in the Streights, between Chal­cedon and Byzantium. Pay. 2. p. 397. Malela says, that Aurelian caus'd her to ride on a Dromedary, and carry'd her with him [Page 125]through all the East, till he came to Antioch, where for three Days he ex­posed her to the sight of the People, loaden with Fetters, who had often seen her in the height of her Glory; after which, he transported her to Rome, where, after she had acted her part among the Princes of the conquer'd Provinces, he caus'd her to be Be­headed. But Tom. 2. p. 240. Zonaras talks doubtfully, his Authors from whom he derived his Notices differing in their Accounts; some affirming, that the Victor used her with the greatest Clemency, and marry'd her at Rome to a Man of Qua­lity, ( Syncellus says he was a Senator,) others, that she died by the way, op­prest with grief for the loss of her Em­pire, and that Aurelian himself mar­ried one of her Daughters, and dis­pos'd of the others for Wives to the most Illustrious of the Romans.

But in the Memoirs of the Western Affairs, we are rather to be guided by the Writers of that Country, who may be presumed to have been better ac­quainted with what was done in their own Country, than those who liv'd at a great distance in the East. And they [Page 126]all agree, Hier. Chron. Eutrop. Treb. Pol. &c. that Zenobia surviv'd all her Misfortunes, that Aurelian gave her her Life for her own sake, and for the Me­rits of Odenathus, and that she lived very happily in Italy, after she, having been devested of the Empire of the East, had made her Figure in the Tri­umph of Aurelian; and I shall account for the Pomp of it, which the Historian says was Specious and Magnificent, be­cause that was the last of the Imperial Triumphs, which was made according to the ancient manner. Though it must be confest, that Onuphrius Pan­vinius says, that the last Triumph was that of Belisarius, who, by the Order of the Emperor Justinian, was allowed to make his Entry into the City of Con­stantinople in a Triumphant Chariot, drawn by four Horses a breast, after he had recover'd Africa out of the hands of the Vandals, and made Gelimer their King his Prisoner; and that his Scho­liast Joachim Maderus affirms, that Heraclius, Johannes Commenus, and Manuel his Son, had their several Triumphs: But these have no re­lation to Rome, but to Constanti­nople. And of the Triumph of Beli­sarius, [Page 127]Procopius says expresly, Vandal. l. 2. c. 9. p. 255. [...], &c. that it was not according to the ancient me­thod, but that he began his Procession at his own House, from whence he march'd on foot to the Hippodrome, and from thence to the Imperial Throne; and withal he avers, that for near Six hundred Years before Belisarius, the Honour of the Triumph was not given to any other, since the days of Titus and Trajan, and those other great Emperors who had con­quer'd the Barbarians; among whom, I suppose, he includes Aurelian.

CHAP. XXIX.

THe Triumphal Pomp was always very August: Vopisc. p. 220. & Onufr. de Triumph. p. 140. The whole Senate march'd in their several Ranks toward the Capitol, being followed by the Trumpets of War, who sounding a Charge, introduc'd the Representations of the several Countries that had been subdued, and the Cities that had been [Page 128]taken, done in exquisite Imagery and Picture: After these followed the Riches of the Conquer'd Provinces, vast quan­tities of Gold and Silver, and noble Gems, Crowns and Royal Robes, and the other Ornaments of Royalty and Gran­deur, intermix'd with the Arms that were peculiar to the Regions that had been reduc'd under the Roman Power: These were succeeded, among others, by a long Train of Sacrifices, and Priests attending that Service, all clad in rich Garments of Silk and Purple, inter­wove with Gold: Then came the Cha­riots of the unfortunate Princes, with a long train of their faithful Subjects, who, to shew their Fidelity, were con­tent to follow the adverse Fortune of their Sovereigns.

When Aurelian made his Entry into that superb City, there were three Royal Chariots very remarkable: The first belong'd to the Hero Odenathus, (while alive) richly adorn'd with Gold, and Silver, and Precious-Stones, which gave it a peculiar Lustre. The second, no less glorious than the first, was a Present made by the King of Persia to the Great Aurelian, (who also presented [Page 129]him with a Purple Robe, of so beautiful a Dye, dipt in the Indies, that nothing of the Imperial Wardrobe, or the Ca­binets of the Roman Ladies, was com­parable to it.) The third, was the Chariot which Zenobia had caused to be made for her self, in hopes to have entred Rome in Triumph, after she had reduced that proud City. 'Tis true, she made her entry into Rome in the same Chariot; but she rode in it a Cap­tive, not a Queen.

These Chariots were followed by a fourth, which (as it was reported) did once belong to the King of the Goths, drawn by four Stags a-breast, in which Aurelian (clad in the famous Purple above-mentioned, which he afterwards dedicated to Jupiter Capitolinus, and which after Ages look'd on with Admi­ration) was drawn to the Capitol, where he sacrificed the Stags, according to a Vow made to Jupiter, when he took the Chariot. In the head of these Chariots march'd twenty Elephants; of Lybian Lions, Vid. Sal­mas. in Vo­pisc. pag. 371. Leopards and Pan­thers, as also of those of Palestine, two hundred; which, after the Triumph was ended, Aurelian bestowed on his [Page 130]private Friends, that he might lessen the Publick Expence. These were sol­lowed by four Tygars, by several Camelopardali, Elks, and other strange Beasts, each in their orders.

Part of this Pomp consisted of eight hundred pair of Gladiators destin'd to the Entertainment of the People, and of an infinite number of Captives; for, besides the Barbarous Nations of the Blemmyes, the Inhabitants of Axumis, and of Arabia the Happy; the Indians, Bactrians, Iberians, Saracens and Per­sians; and after them, the Goths, the Alans, the Roxolans, the Sarmatians, Franks, Suevians, Vandals and Ger­mans, with their Hands bound behind their Backs, preceded the Imperial Cha­riot. Among these, the principal Men of Palmyra, as many as had outliv'd the Calamity of their Country, and the Rebels of Egypt, had their station. But the most remarkable of the Captives were ten Masculine Women, who, habited in Mens Cloaths, had done ex­traordinary Service to the Gothick Ge­neral; these few being all that survived of the Amazonian Race, who sought against the Romans; and in the Head [Page 131]of every Nation, was carry'd the Name of the Country to which they belong'd.

Amid'st this numerous train of Prisc­ners, Tetricus made a peculiar Figure; he was habited A-la-mode de France, where he had been Emperor, in a Scar­let Cloak, under which he wore a light Gold-coloured Coat, and a pair of French Breeches; with him was his Son, whom Tetricus had declared Em­peror in France. After him followed Zenobia, deck'd to the greatest advan­tage, but loaden with her Golden Chains, whose weight was supported by her Attendants. The Crown of every conquer'd City, distinguish'd by an eminent Inscription, was carried before every Nation. After them fol­lowed the People of Rome, the Banners of the several Colleges, and the Ensigns of every Regiment, with the Cuirassiers, followed by the rest of the Army. And after these the Senators march'd (but not so brisk and merry as otherwise they would have been on such a Solemnity, because Tetricus, who was a Member of that August Body, was led a Captive in the Triumph.) It was late e're the [Page 132]Cavalcade reach'd the Capitol, but Night before the Emperor return'd to the Palace.

On the following Days the common People were solaced with the sight of Stage-plays, Horse-races, Huntings, the Duels of the Gladiators, and mock Sea­fights. And among other the Plea­santries of that merry time, it is not to be forgotten, that Aurelian, before he made his Expedition into the East, promised the Romans, that if he return'd a Conqueror, he would give a Crown of two Pound weight to every Citizen, which they expected would be of no worse Metal than Gold: But the Em­peror being neither able nor willing, presented each of them with a fine Wheaten Loaf in shape of a Crown, and of the same weight, and one of these he bestowed on every Commoner, every year, as long as he liv'd.

CHAP. XXX.

WHen this Ceremony was over, Aurelian gave both Tetricus and Zenobia their Lives, constituting Tetricus (a) Corrector of Lucania, ( Trebellius Pollio says, of all Italy,) and setling Zenobia at Rome, where she liv'd in much Plenty and Honour to a great Age, maintaining the Port of a Roman Matron, by the Estate which the Emperor possest her of in Tivoli, not far from the Emperor Adrian's Palace, and the Place which is called Conchae (or Concae;) and so well she behav'd her self in her new Habitation, that the Place of her Residence was called Zenobia, from the illustrious Inhabi­tant.

The precise Situation of this Zenobia (the Villa of this excellent Princess) is to this day under dispute: Cons. del Ré de l'An­tichità Ti­burtine, par. 2. c. 5. Fulvio Car­doli says, that the Ruines of the Villa Zenobia are to be seen in that Place that is called Colle di Santo Stephano, which is situate near the Palace of Adrian. But Del Ré avers, that Conchae is near the Lake Della Solforata, call'd the Baths; that the Plain is to this day called the Plain of Conche; and, that the noble Marbles to be seen there, are a demonstration that he was not mi­staken in the Situation. The Baths being built (says the learned Andrea Bacci) by Agrippa, for the use of such as would fre­quent them; that three hundred years after their first Foundation, the Place was deputed for the Habitation of Zenobia; and, that the Cardinal Hyppolito of Fer­rara found there a Jewel of Gold, an Antique Vessel of Silver, and other Or­naments belonging to the Ladies of those early times, with an Inscription, that in that Place one of the Daughters of Zenobia was buried. From all which, viz. from the Name Conche, still re­maining, from the Antique Fabricks standing thereabouts, and from what [Page 135]was found there, it may be gathered, that the Villa Zenobia could not be far off.

Some Authors affirm, that Zenobia's Sons, Herennianus and Timolaus, were slain by Aurelian's Order, (Greatness is seldom unaccompanied with Jea­lousie; and a Rival Prince never thinks his Title secure, till his Competitor is in his Grave;) but others say, that they tasted of the Emperor's Clemency, and died at Rome natural Deaths, the very year in which they were brought thither, Ann. Chr. 273, Pag. 385. (says Mezzo­barba;) while Vaballathus having been led in Triumph with his Mother Ze­nobia, spent the remainder of his life in a private station. But whence that learned Man had these Notices, I pro­fess I know not. This we are sure of, that in the Reign of Constantine the Great, her Posterity were reckon'd among the Nobility of Rome, so says Trebellius Pollio expresly: In the Reign of Valens the same Family continued in great Reputation, says Eutropius: And St. Jerom witnesses the same thing for the times of Honorius. And Cardinal Baronius imagines, that Zenobius the [Page 136]Bishop of Florence, St. Ambrose's Con­temporary, was one of the Descendants of this famous Empress; but I suppose he built his Conjecture on no other Foundation, but the Likeness of the Names.

Such was the Fate of this illustrious Lady; such the Destiny of Palmyra, the Metropolis of her Empire, under Aurelian; L. 5. p. 53. a Catastrophe, if we may credit the Heathen Historian Zosimus (who was a great Bigot for Paganism) foretold by Oracles, Vid. Ap­pend. and confirm'd by more than one sad Omen, which de­termin'd the period of that short-liv'd Empire.

CHAP. XXXI.

AƲrelian having thus subdued all his Adversaries, Aurel. Vit. &c. and establish'd his own and the Empires Quiet, lived after this in an extraordinary Pomp and Splendor: He was the first of the Roman Emperors who habited himself in Cloth of Gold, the first who wore Gems on [Page 137]his Cloaths, and in his Shoes, and put on a Diadem, (the Coin in Oeselius de­scribing him encircled with a Diadem different from, and more rich than those of his Predecessors:) He valued himself, as the Recoverer of the Empire both in the East and West, as the Re­storer of the World to its desired Peace and Tranquility, and as one who was born a God, Deus & Dominus Natus, on the reverse of one of his Coins in Mezzo­barba, p. 407. and the Lord of the Uni­verse. He was undoubtedly an emi­nent Prince, though born of mean Pa­rents, comparable to the Alexanders, and the Julius Caesars of former Ages, if he had not sully'd the Lustre of his Vertues by his Excessive Cruelties, of which the Carnage at the Sack of Pal­myra is a severe Instance. And so valuable did he account that Victory, that, to preserve the Memory of it (ac­cording to the Practice of the Roraan Emperors) he added to his Imperial Titles, among many others, that of the Palmyrenian, as appears by an old In­scription consecrated to his Honour in the Fifth Year of his Reign, in Thesaur. p. 274. Goltzius, ( i. e. the last, says Petavius and Tristan, though the old Ibid. Coins (and their Au­thority is to me unquestionable) ex­presly [Page 138]mention the Sixth Year of his Reign; and with them agrees the Pag. 637. Chronicon, commonly call'd the Alex­andrian,) which is worth the preserving, because in very few Inscriptions the mention of Palmyra occurs:

MAGNO AUGUSTO PRINCIPI MAX. IMP. FORTISSIMO, CON­SERVATORI ORBIS, L. DOMITIO AURELIANO P. F. PONT. MAX. TRIB. POT. V. P. P. COS. III. PROCOS. GOTH. MAX. PALMYR. MAX. GER. MAX.

ORDO BRIXIANORUM.

Or, To the Great Au­gustus. To the Great and August, the most Illustri­ous of Princes, the Bravest of Emperors, the Preserver of the World, Lucius Do­mitius Aurelianus, Pious and Happy, the Chief Priest, in the Fifth Year of his Tribunitian Power, the Father of his Country, Consul the Third time, Pro­consul, the most Glorious Conqueror of the Goths, the Palmyrenians and Ger­mans,

The Brescians dedicate this Inscription.

His Cruelty was the cause of his Death; for his Secretary Eros (or Mnestheus, as Vopiscus calls him) having been threatned by Aurelian, and fearing his fierce Temper, thought it adviseable to prevent his own Death, by imbruing his Hands in the Blood of his Master, whom, by the help of his Accomplices in the Treason, and by the Hand of Mucapores, he slew, as he was taking the Air, attended with but a thin Guard, while the Camp lay at the New Castle (Coenophrium) a Mansion between Heraclea and Byzantium, in the Road, toward Persia, against which Aurelian was marching his Army, Cuspin. Caes. p. 79. to revenge himself upon that Nation, for assisting Zenobia in the former War against the Romans.

Thus Aurelian made his Exit, in the Chron. Alex. p. 637. Seventy fifth Year of his Age; and after his Death, was honoured, as the more deserving Princes usually were, with a Deification, as both the Histo­rians and the Coins declare.

CHAP. XXXII.

BUt though Palmyra was thus ruin'd by the Commands of Au­relian, I cannot think it was wholly raz'd, it not being consonant to the Wisdom of that August Government to slight so strong a Garrison upon the Borders; for this would have been the same, as to invite the Persians to a new Invasion; but that the Emperor, who gave a particular Order to re-build, beautifie and endow the noble Temple of the Sun, that had been plunder'd and destroyed by the insolent Soldiers, did also take care, that the City should be put in a posture of defence, so as it might obstruct the Irruptions of the Enemy, and that to that end he consti­tuted Cerronius Bassus the Governor of that Province; though I doubt not, but it lost the Privileges of a Roman Co­lony, of a Metropolis, and in all pro­bability of a Free City, and was only left in the condition of a Garrison, or Praesidium. For as it was usual to ad­vance a Praesidium, or Fort, to the [Page 141]Honour of a City, as Bosra in Arabia was promoted by the Emperor Severus; so, on the contrary, a City often lost its Franchises, when it turn'd Rebel to the Emperor. In this condition I sup­pose it to have been, when Dioclesian and Maximinian wore the Imperial Purple, Hierocles at that time being the Praefect of the Province, as appears by the only Latin Inscription that hath been as yet found at Palmyra; the Pil­lar being erected to the Honour of the above-named Emperors, Vid. Ap­pend. and of Constan­tius and Galerius Maximianus the Cae­sars, who had most happily founded Castra.

Now, that we may know when Castra was founded, it will be necessary to consider the State of the Empire at that time. Dioclesian having been op­posed by many Competitors, was par­ticularly rival'd by Achilleus in Egypt; Eutrop. brev. Idat. Chron. against him therefore he march'd in Per­son, besieged him in Alexandria, and at last slew him. After this, he went into Me­sopotamia, and there making a halt, sent Galerius, Ann. Chr. 296, against Narses King of Persia. Galerius rashly engaging the Persians, between Callinicus and [Page 142] Carrae, with a very small Force, was routed, and beaten back to the Camp of Dioclesian; who, when he met him, treated him with so much scorn, that he made him run in his Purple Robe some Miles by his Chariot-side, like a Foot-man, before he vouchsafed to speak to him. But in a little time after this, Ann. Chr. 297, upon Galerius his important Solicitations, he furnish'd him with Recruits from Illyricum and Maesia, and commanded him to retrieve the Honour he had lost in the first Engage­ment, and accordingly he behav'd him­self with so much Bravery in the second Battle (in which with 25000 Men he broke into the Enemies Camp) that he routed the Persians, beat them out of Armenia Major, where they had posted themselves, took the Tents and Bag­gage of Narses, and a great Booty, made his Wives, his Sisters, and Children, (his Daughters, says Rufus Festus,) with a great part of the Persian Nobility, Pri­soners, drove the King to fly for shelter to the remotest Solitudes of his Domi­nions, and acquitted the Romans from the ignominy of the Captivity of Va­lerian.

Narses being reduc'd to so great ex­tremity by this last Blow, P. Patric. excerpt. p. 26. that had al­most determin'd the period of his Em­pire, chose Appharban, one of the most trusty and most beloved of his Courtiers (his Praefectus Praetorio, as the Historian, using the Style of his own Country, calls him) his Chief Minister, a Man of Address, and happy Application, to be his Ambassador to Galerius; who having obtained leave to deliver his Message, thus accosted this victorious Prince; ‘That all Mankind knew, that the two Empires of Rome and Persia, were two great Luminaries, which, like the two Eyes in the Body, were to receive Lustre, Beauty and Help one from the other; that it was unnatural, when they endeavoured to extinguish each other; that to destroy, and bring to desolation, could not be reckon'd among the illustrious Atchievements, but must be accounted an effect of Madness and Folly; that only meaner Spirits delighted in the Ruine of their Enemies; that Narseus was not to be reckoned a weak Prince, because he was unfortunate, but that Galerius being the greatest of Monarchs, the [Page 144]Conquest of Narseus, who was in no one noble Qualification inferior to any of his Predecessors, was referv'd by the Destinies for him. And that he further had it in his Commission to assure him, That though his Master had a just Title to his Dominions, yet he threw himself upon the Mercy and Clemency of the Romans; that he would not offer any Terms to Gale­rius, but would be content with what­ever Articles he would please to allow him, desiring him to return him his Wives and his Children; that this Humanity would entitle him to a nobler Conquest, than his victorious Arms; and, that his generous Usage of his Family already had been such, that he profess'd his inability to pay him his Acknowledgments as he de­served.’ — (For the Kings Wives and Children had been treated with all sort of handsom Usage; and the Nobi­lity who had been made Prisoners of War, except their restraint, found no difference between their Captivity and Freedom, between the Enemies Camp and their own Palaces; that not only no Insults were made on their Persons, [Page 145]no Injuries offered them, but their En­tertainment was liberal, and suited to their Quality.) To this the Persian Embassa­dor subjoin'd, ‘That the State of Man­kind was very mutable, and subject to great Alterations,’

Upon this Galerius seem'd to be in a heat, and answer'd, ‘That it was not well done of the Persians, to desire their Adversaries to consider the Instabilty of Humane Affairs; because, whenever they were bless'd with Success, them­selves were the most insolent of Con­querors, and added new Afflictions, by their opprobrious Usage to those who who were before most heavily opprest: putting them in mind of their inhu­mane Carriage toward the unfortunate Emperor Valerian, to whom they shew'd neither Justice nor Moderation; for after you had circumvented him, and made him your Prisoner, you kept him in Chains, till he had languisht out many years in durance, and without any re­gard to his extreme Age, or his Sacred Character, you used him with scorn, and at last put him to a cruel and disho­nourable Death: And whereas the Rage of the most violent and wicked Men [Page 146]uses to be appeas'd, when their Ad­versaries are dead, your Malice out­liv'd the Object of it; and though his Body was mortal, you resolv'd to treat it with a Tyranny that endeavour'd to make it self immortal; for having flea'd that great Prince alive, you salted and preserved his Skin, as a lasting Me­morial of your Treachery, and insa­tiable Cruelty: This last thing, he as­sured the Embassador he mention'd, not that he resolved to follow so ignomi­nious a President, but to convince the Persians that they could not have any Pretensions to that Humane Usage which they petition'd for; and that he was satisfied, that their Argument from the Inconstancy of Humane Affairs, never made any impression on their Minds in the days of their Prosperity; while he was resolv'd to tread in the steps and to imitate the nobler Practices of his Predecessors, who were accustom'd to suppress the Stubborn and Obstinate, but to comfort and support the Peni­tent.’ — And having thus spoken, he commanded the Embassador to return to his Master, and to represent to him the Clemency of the Romans, of whose Cou­rage [Page 147]he had lately met with an unque­stionable Demonstration, bidding him to expect in a short time the return of the Prisoners, according to his Desires.

Having dismist the Persian Embas­sador, the Triumphant Galerius re­turn'd into Mesopotamia to Dioclesian, cover'd with Lawrels, and the Trophies of an entire Victory, and was received with the testimonies of the greatest Ho­nour, as he justly deserv'd. At Nisibis, Galerius met the Emperor, without whose Consent himself, being only Caesar at that time, could not confirm a Peace, and having made Dioclesian acquainted with the Particulars, consulted with him what Articles they should propose to the Persian Monarch. P. Patric. Excerp. p. 29. 30. When they had ad­justed the Affair, they sent Sicorius Pro­bus, the Emperor's Secretary, into Per­sia, with the Terms of Agreement. The King treated the Embassador with all Ci­vility; but, pretending some hinderance or other, carried him with him from place to place, till he came to Asprudis, a River of Media, where the scattered remains of his routed Army, having ral­lyed, and embody'd themselves, pitcht their Tents; there he granted the Em­bassador [Page 148]all the Demands of his Master the Emperor, except that the Place of Meeting should be Nisibis: Upon which the Persian Monarch's Wife and Children were restored him, and the Captive No­bility had their Liberty.

At this time Castra was founded by Dioclesian, says Lib. 23. cap. 5. Ammianus Marcellinus, (and Par. 2. p. 17. Johannes Malela,) which he calls Cercusium; Malela, Circisium; but the Subscriptions of the Chalcedon Council, Castro-Circon, by a complication of both Names. For the Irruptions of the Persians into the Roman Territories on the side of the Euphrates were so destructive to those Provinces, that the Procop. Persic. l. 2. c. 5. p. 97. & de Aedi­fic. l. 2. c. 3. p. 42. Emperors saw it very necessary to build several Cities and Castles upon the Banks of that River, to secure their Borders, particularly in that large and barren Desart that lies between Euphratesia and the Persian Limits; in that Solitude Dioclesian erected three Castles built of unbak'd Bricks, of which number Mambri was one, which was si­tuate five miles below Zenobia; but Cir­cesium stood three days Journey lower than Zenobia, and as far from Palmyra, be­ing the last and remotest Castle that the Romans had on their Confines, a little be­low [Page 149] Thapsacus; it was built very neat, and very strong, on the confluence of the Euphrates, and the Abora (or Cha­borras, as it is called in Ptolemy) two noble Rivers, which wash the Walls of the City, being situated on the farther side of the Euphrates, in that very Angle which the two Rivers make when they meet: Besides the Ramparts of the Castle, it was defended by a long Wall, which extended it self for some miles on the sides of both the Rivers, and was built in the figure of a Triangle. In times past it was a mean place, and not tenable; but Dioclesian fenced it with high Walls and Towers, when in the Confines of the Barbarians he fix'd the Limits of the Roman Empire, lest the Persians should by that Pass invade Syria, as they had in times past often done, to the great detriment of the Provinces, paricularly under Ammian. ubi supr. Gallienus, when they march'd their Army over this Ford, and sack't and burnt Antioch. In Malel. par. 2. p. 17. the Reign of Julian the Apostate it was garrison'd with 6000 Men: and in the 13th. Year of Precop. ubi supr. Justinian, when Chosroes brought his Forces thither, with a design that way to invade the Empire, he durst not attempt [Page 150]it. After which time, how long it con­tinued in the hands of the Emperors of the East, I know not. By all which it appears, that Castra was founded Anno Christi 27 8/9. and that at that time Hierocles was Governor of Palmyra.

CHAP. XXXIII.

IN the Reign of Honorius, Palmyra continued a Roman Garrison, the Town being then under the Inspection of the Dux Phoeniciae, as the Notitiae, collected probably in that Emperor's Reign, affirm; commanded by a Co­lonel, or Praefect of the first Illyrian Legion, which was left there in Garrison. And in this state it was when Stephen the Grammarian of Constantinople pub­lish'd his Work concerning the Cities; for he calls it expresly a Castle of Syria ( [...],) as Hermolaus his Epitomator, who dedicated his Breviate to the Emperor Justinian informs us. But though the Civil Privileges of the [Page 151]City were infring'd, it retain'd the Ho­nour of an Episcopal See; this fell not under the cognizance of the Pagan Em­perors, and for that reason was not for­tified; the Church being careful to pre­serve her Rights, when the City ho­nour'd with the Episcopal Jurisdiction, had lost her's.

Justinian having determin'd, in the First Year of his Reign, Ann. Chr. 52⅞. to make War upon the Persians, resolv'd to re-build Palmyra, says Procopius, who thus describes it: Procop. de Aedific. l. 2. c. 11. p. 50. & l. 5. c. 1. p. 95. That there was a City of Phoenicia, near Mount Libanus, cal­led Palmyra, built of old in a Country that had no Neighbours but such as were at a great distance, but most com­modiously situated to observe the move­ments of the Saracens, the Enemies of the Romans, having been built on pur­pose to prevent the Irruptions of those Barbarians into the Roman Territories. This City having been for a long time deserted, Justinian strengthened with ex­traordinary Fortifications, bringing Wa­ter to the Place for the support of a strong Garrison which he fix'd there. (And to Justinian I am enclined to attri­bute the building the Castle of Palmyra, Vid. Jour­nal p. 84, 85, 103. [Page 152]rather than to a Prince of the Druses, who never, that we read of, enlarged their Territories as far as Tadmur; as also, that noble Aqueduct seems to be of his Foundation, which runs under­ground in a direct passage five miles, and is cover'd all the way with an Arch of bastard-Marble, and a Path on both sides the Chanel, large enough for two Persons to walk a breast in, with Venti­ducts at every twenty yards distance, being built for the supply of the Garrison with Water.) This was done (says Chronogr. p. 148. Theophanes) in the First Year of Justi­nian, after the Death of his Uncle Justin, the Emperor having given Commission to Patricius the Armenian, the Governor of the East, to see the Work done ef­fectually, having furnish'd him with Money to that purpose, commanding also the Governor of the East to make that Place the Seat of his constant Resi­dence, and to preserve the Churches from the Sacrilegious Saracens.

Eight Years after this, Procop. Bel. Pers. l. 2. c. 1. p. 88. when Belisarius had reduced Italy under the Obedience of the Emperor, Ann. Chr. 535, Chosroes King of Persia concerted his Affairs with Alamundarus one of the Arabian Princes, [Page 153]that he should invade Arethas another of the Saracen Kings, but in the Roman Interest, upon the pretext, that Arethas detain'd from him a little Region cal­led Strata, that lies to the South of the City Palmyra, but barren of all things being burnt with the fervent Sun, so that it produces neither Trees nor Fruits, and is destin'd only to the feeding of a few Cattle. Id. c. 5. p. 97. Whereupon Chosroes made an Inroad into the Roman Territories, march'd his Army three days by the Banks of the River Euphrates, till he came to Zenobia, the Foundation of the Queen of Palmyrene; but finding the Region uninhabited, and destitute of all Necessaries, the City also refusing to sur­render, when required to do so, he re­tired to Sura, another City upon the Euphrates.

CHAP. XXXIV.

ABout a hundred Years after the repairing of Palmyra by Justinian, it pleased God to permit Mahomet, an obscure Arab, to scourge the Eastern Churches for their Heresies, and their [Page 154]loose Manners; and to lay the Founda­tions of an Empire, which, with the Religion call'd Mahometan, hath pre­vail'd over a great part of the known World, and in a very few years after the first appearance of that false Prophet, establish't its Jurisdiction in Tadmur, where it prevails to this day.

In the Year of Christ, Elmacin. l. 1. c. 1. 623. the Second of the Hegira, Chosroes the Second, the King of Persia, commanded all the Churches in Syria and Mesopotamia to be destroy'd, carrying away with him all the Gold and Silver, with all the Or­naments of those Holy Places, even to the very Marble, into his own Country. It is probable, that Tadmur was not ex­empt from this dreadful Persecution: But whatever its Fate was under Chosroes, it is unquestionable, that a few years after­wards it fell into the Hands of the Ma­hometans, who, Anno Christi 638, He­girae 16, having taken the Capital City of the Persians, and routed Izdigerdes their last King, and seiz'd his Empire (the Constantinopolitan Princes not con­cerning themselves, as they ought, to prevent these sudden and large Con­quests) may be presumed to have made [Page 155] Palmyra their own. After which time, I believe, the Fortifications were permit­ted to run to decay, it being no longer a Frontier, since Persia was in their hands on one side of it, and Arabia on the other: And then also, I conjecture, it ceas'd to be a Mart, the Mahometans be­ing in constant Hostility with the Chri­stians; so that the Caravans not being able to travel safely, the Trade with the Persian Gulph was diverted and lost; of which beneficial Commerce the City being deprived, and situate in a desart Country, soon fell into Poverty and Ruine.

In the Year 659, the 39th. Elmac. l. 1. c. 5. of the Mahometan Computation, when Muavias the Son of Abusofianus, with his Army of Syrians, march'd against Alis the Fifth of Mahomet's Successors, he sent Da­hacus with 3000 Men to plunder Iraca, after which they fell into the Province of Higiaza, and having murther'd all the Arabs they met with, loaded themselves with their Spoiles. Whereupon Alis sent against him his General Hagjar the Son of Adis, with 4000 Men, who fol­fowed them as far as Tadmur within the [Page 156]District of Emesa (for so it was reckon'd at that time) where they had a sharp En­gagement, in which Dahacus was routed. And by this it is very plain, that Tadmur came very early into the hands of the Successors of Mahomet.

Anno Christi 746, Id. l. 1. c. 21. of the Hegira 127, the People of Emesa, at that time the Metropolis of the Country, rebell'd against Merwan the Caliph, who came against the Town with a strong Force, and besieged it: Whereupon the In­habitants supplicated his Pardon, pro­mised Obedience, and open'd their Gates. But when the Caliph had entred the City in the Head of 300 Men, the Citizens betook themselves to their Arms, and slew all the Soldiers, Merwan him­self hardly escaping through the Gate that leads to Tadmur, (the old Roman Road lay from Emesa to Apamea, and thence to Palmyra, but the direct Road lay through the Desart, without touch­ing at Apamea;) and when Suleiman the Son of Hisjam, being created Caliph, in opposition to Merwan, by the Men of Basra, was overthrown in Battle, he re­tired, first to Emesa, which he fortified; [Page 157]but being a second time beaten, he fled to Tadmur, leaving his Brother Saidus his Lieutenant in Emesa. From which Pas­sages it appears to me credible, that Tad­mur was then a Place of little Trade or Interest, but a Sanctuary for the Unfor­tunate, for Banditti, and Free-booters, who fled thither, and found a secure re­treat, being protected by the advanta­geous Situation of the Town, which for several Days Journey was on every side surrounded with wild and uninhabited Solitudes.

And if I might be allowed a bold Conjecture, how the River that ran by Palmyra, in Ptolemy's time, and which Marius Niger says emptied it self into the Euphrates, happen'd so to be lost, that now there remain no footsteps of it; I would affirm, Elmacin, l. 2. c. 11. that it was buried in that terrible Earthquake that happen'd in those Countries, Anno Christi 859, of the Hegira 245, which ruin'd many a noble City, threw down the Palace at Bagdat, did great damage to Carrae, Emesa, Damascus, Edessa, Laodicea, and all along the Coast of Syria: for at this time, the Arabick Historian avers, that a River vanish't (nor is it unusual in such [Page 158]most violent Concussions) being swal­lowed up of the Earth, that no Man ever could discover what new Channel it had found under ground. At this time, 'tis highly probable, Tadmur did not escape, when all the neighbouring Cities were harrast, and then the River might be absorpt. Nor does Justinian's bringing Water to Tadmur, for the service of his Garrison, contradict this Opinion, because a River may be for other uses, and yet not fit for Drink, many other of the Springs in those Countries being brackish and sulphurous.

About the Year of Christ 1172, Itiner. p. 57, 58. Ben­jamin Tudelensis the Jew, among other Parts of the East which he visited in his Travels, touch'd at Tadmur, and he in­forms us (though he is mistaken in the exact distances of Places) that from Baalbeck (or Baalath) built by Solomon in the Valley of Libanus, to Tadmur in the Desart, was four Days Journey; that Solomon built it of large Stones, and fenced it with a strong Wall; that it was built in a Desart far from any Inha­bitants; and that in his time there were in the City 2000 stout Jews, who waged War with the Christians, and with the [Page 159] Arabs the Subjects of Sultan Noraldin, but were ready to assist their Neighbours the Ishmaelites. From which Passage it appears, that in Benjamin's time, the Eastern Jews, a Race of known Wan­derers, had nested in Tadmur, deserted probably by the Arabs, and that they lived by Rapine and Inroads.

When the Caliphs of Babylon began to lose their Empire, I question not but Tadmur became subject to the Mamalukes; and upon the fall of their Empire, to the Grand Signior, under whose Jurisdiction they now live, though govern'd by a Prince of their own, and by the Usage of our English Merchants, when Melham was their Emir, it is put past all doubt that they have not forgotten, to this day, the Custom of their Ancestors, of rob­bing all that fall into their hands; for which Rapines, and their other ill ma­nagement, their Emirs are frequently deposed, and sometimes strangled by the Ottoman Port; so Melham, who robb'd the English Merchants, was in some time after surpriz'd by the Bassa of Aleppo, and put to death. Hassine, his Successor, was, Anno 1693, deposed, and one Dor substituted the Emir of those Arabs.

Thus I have, according to the best of my Understanding, given the History of Palmyra, from its first Foundation, to the present Age: And by this Ac­count we may learn, that Cities, as well as their Inhabitants, have their Infancy and Youth, their Riper Years, and their [...]ecrepit Days; that nothing can resist the Insults of Time, and the Barbarity of Ungovernable Conquerors; and that it is impossible to erect a Monument to our Memory, that shall be lasting, but a noble Series of Vertuous and Brave Actions, that they only rescue from Oblivion, and give Immortality, when Marbles shall Moulder into Dust, and the World it self shall be no more.

FINIS.
THE APPENDIX: OR, Cr …

THE APPENDIX: OR, Critical Observations Upon the Names of Palmyra and Tadmur; AND THE INHABITANTS, Their Offices and Religion.

Together with an Account of Vaballathus and Longinus: AND A Commentary on the Inscriptions.

Inscriptiones Palmyrenae.

I. Sepulchralia.

I. 1. ΤΟ ΜΝΗΜΕΙΟΝ ΤΟΥ ΤΑΡΦΕω­ΝΟϹ ΕΚΤΙϹΕΝ ΕΞΙΔΙωΝ ϹΕΠΤΙΜΙΟϹ ΟΔΑΙΝΑΘΟϹ Ο ΛΑΜΠΡΟΤΑΤΟϹ ϹΥΝΚΛΗΤ[ΙΚΟϹ] ΑΙΡΑΝΟΥ ΟΥΑ­ΒΑΛΛΑΘΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΝΑϹωΡΟΥ ΑΥ­ΤωΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΥΙΟΙϹ ΑΥΤΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΥΙω­ΝΟΙϹ ΕΙϹ ΤΟ ΠΑΝ-ΤΕΛΕϹ ΑΙωΝΙΟΝ ΤΕΙΜΗΝ.

II. 2. ΜΑΡΘΕΙΝ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΚΑΠΑΔΗΤΟΥ ΟΥΑΒΑΛΛΑΘΟΥΤΟΥ ϹΥΜωΝΟΥ ϹΟΡΑΙΧΟϹ ΑΙΡΑΝΟΥ ΑΝΗΡ ΑΥΤΗϹ ΜΝΗΜΗϹ ΕΝΕΚΕΝ ΜΗΝΕΙ ΔΥϹΤΡω ΤΟΥ ςΥ ΕΤΟΥϹ.

III. 3. ΤΟ ΜΝΗΜΕΙΟΝ ΕΚΤΙϹΑΝ ΕΚΑΒΗΛΕϹ ΜΑΝΝΑΙΟϹ ϹΟΧΑΕΙϹ ΜΑΛΧϹϹ ΟΥΑΒΑΛΛΑΘΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΝΝΑΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΕΛΑΒΗΛΟΥ ΑΥΤω ΚΑΙ ΥΙΟΙϹ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΔΙΥ ΜΗ­ΝΟϹ ΣΑΝΔΙΚΟΥ.

IV. 4. ΜΝΗΜΕΙΟΝ ΑΙωΝΙΟΝ ΓΕΡΑϹ ωΚΟΔΟΜΗϹΕΝ ΓΙΧΟϹ ΜΟΚΙΜΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΚΑΙΛΚΙΑΛϹΙϹΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑ ........ ΟΥ ΕΙϹΤΕ ΕΑΥΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΥΙΟΥϹ ΚΑΙ ΕΚΓΟΝΟΥϹ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΔΙΤ ΜΗΝΕΙ ΞΑΝΔΙΚω.

II. Elogia Honoraria.

I. Publica ex decreto Senatûs. 5. ΗΒΟΥΑΗ ΚΑΙ Ο ΔΗΜΟϹ ΑΛΙ­ΛΑΜΕΝΑ ΡΑΝΟΥ ΜΟΚΙΜΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΑΙΡΑΝΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΘΘΑ ΚΑΙ [Page 165]ΑΙΡΑΝΗΝ ΤΟΝ ΡΑΤΕΡΑ ΑΥΤΟΥ ΕΥϹΕΒΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΡΗΙΛΟΡΑΤΡΙΔΑϹ Κ[ΑΙ] ΡΑΝΤΙ ΤΡΟΡω [ΕΥ]ϹΕΙΜωϹ ΑΡΕϹΑΝΤΑϹ ΤΗΡΑΤΡΙΔΙΚΑΙ ΡΑ­ΤΡΙΟΙϹ ΘΕΟΙϹ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΧΑΡΙΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΝΥ Λ ΜΗΝΟϹ ΞΑΝΔΙ­ΚΟΥ.

II. 6. Η ΒΟΥΛΗ ΚΑΙ Ο ΔΗΜΟϹ ΒΑΡΕΙΧΕΙΝ ΑΜΡΙϹΑΜϹΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΙΑΡΙΒωΛΕΟΥϹ ΚΑΙ ΜΟΚΙΜΟΝ ΥΙΟΝ ΑΥΤΟΥ ΕΥϹΕΒΕΙϹ ΚΑΙ ΡΗΙ­ΛΟΡΑΤΡΙΔΑϹ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΧΑΡΙΝ ....

III. 7. Η ΒΟΥΛΗ ΚΑΙ Ο ΔΗΜΟϹ ΙΟΥΛΙΟΝ ΑΥΡΗΛΙΟΝ ΖΗΝΟΒΙΟΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΖΑΒΔΙΛΑΝ ΔΙϹΜΑΛ­ΧΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΝΑϹϹΟΥΜΟΥ ϹΤΡΑ­ΤΗΓΗϹΑΝΤ'Α ΕΝ ΕΡΙΔΗΜΙΑ ΘΕΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΥΡΗΡΕΤΗϹΑΝ­ΤΑ ΡΑΡΟΥϹΙΑ ΔΙΗΝΕΚΕΙ ΡΟΥ­ΤΙΛΛΙΟΥ ΚΡΙϹΡΕΙΝΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΗΓΗ­ϹΑΜΕΝΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΕΡΙΔΗΜΗϹΑϹΑΙϹ ΟΥΗΞΙΛΛΑΤΙΟϹΙΝ ΑΓΟΡΑΝΟ­ΜΗϹΑΝΤΑΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΟΙΚΟΝΙϹωΝΑ ΡΗΕΙΔΗϹΑΝΤΑ ΧΡΗΜΑΤωΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΛωϹ ΡΟΛΕΙΤΕΥϹΑΜΕΝΟΝ ωϹ [Page 166]ΔΙΑ ΤΑΥΤΑ ΜΑΡΤΥΡΗΘΕΝΤΑ ΥΡΟ ΘΕΟΥ ΙΑΡΙΒωΛΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΥΡΟ ΙΟΥΛΙΟΥ ....... ΤΟΥ ΕΞΟΧωΤΑ­ΤΟΥ ΕΡΑΡΧΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΙΕΡΟΥ ΡΡΑΙ­ΤωΡΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΗϹ ΡΑΤΡΙΔΟϹ ΤΟΝ ΡΗΙΛΟΡΑΤΡΙΝ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΧΑ­ΡΙΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΔΝΡΗ.

IV. 8. Η ΒΟΥΛ[Η ΚΑΙ Ο ΔΗ] ΜΟϹ ϹΕΡΤΙΜΙΟΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΡΑΤΙϹΤΟΝ Ε[ΡΙΤΡΟΡΟΝ Ϲ]ΕΒΑϹΤΟΥ ΔΟΥ­ΚΗΝ[ΑΡΙΟΝ] .... ΕΟΔΟΤΗΝ ΤΗϹ ΜΗΤ[ΟΚΟΛω] ΝΕΙΑϹΚΑΙ ΑΝΑΚΟ­ΚΟΜΙϹΑ[ΝΤΑ Τ]ΑϹ ϹΥΝΟΔΙΑΣ ΕΞ ΙΔΙωΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΡΤΥΡΗΘΕΝΤΑ ΥΡΟ ΙωΝ ΑΡΧΕΜΡΟΡωΝΚΑΙ ΛΑΜ­ΡΡωϹ ϹΤΡΑΤΗΓΗϹΑΝΤΑ ΚΑΙ Α­ΑΓΟΡΑΜΟΜΗϹΑΝΤΑ ΤΗϹ ΑΥ­ΤΗϹ ΜΗΤΡΟΚΟΛωΝΕΙΑϹ ΚΑΙ ΡΛΕΙϹΤΑ ΟΙΚΟΘΕΝ ΑΝΑΛωϹΑΝΤΑ ΚΑΙΑΡΕϹΑΝΤΑ ΤΗΤΕ ΑΥΤΗ ΒΟΥ­ΛΗ ΚΑΙ ΤωΔΗΜω ΚΑΙ ΝΥΝΕΙ ΛΑΜ­ΡΡωϹ ϹΥΜΡΟϹΙΑΡΧΟΝ ΤωΝ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΟϹ ΒΗΛΟΥ ΙΕ[Ρ]ωΝ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΕΝΕΚΕΝ ΕΤ ............ ΞΑΝΔΙΚω.

II. Elogia Honoraria privata.

I. 9. ΙΟΥΛΙΟΝ ΑΥΡΗΛΑΙΟΝ ΖΕΒΕΙΔΑΝ ΜΟ­ΚΙΜΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΖΕΒΕΙΔΟΥ ....... ΑϹΤΗωΡΟ­ΒΑΙΔΑΙΟΙ ϹΥΝ Α[Υ]Τω ΚΑΤΕΛΤΗΟΝΤΕϹ ΕϹ ΟΛΟΓΕϹΙΑΔΑ ΕΝΡΟΡΟΙΑΝ ΕϹΤΗϹΑΝ ΑΡΕ­ϹΑΝΤΑ ΑΥΤΟΙϹ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΧΑΡΙΝ ΞΑΝΔΙΚω ΤΟΥ ΗΝΡΗ ΕΤΟΥϹ ....

II. 10. ϹΕΡΤΙΜΙΟΝ ΟΥΟΡωΔΗΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΡΑ­ΤΙϹΤΟΝ ΕΡΙΤΡΟΡΟΝ ϹΕΒΑϹΤΟΥ ΔΟΥΚΗ­ΝΑΡΙΟΝ ΚΑΙ (a) ΑΡΟΑΡΕΤΗΝ ΙΟΥΛΙΟϹ ΑΥΡΗΛΙΟϹ (b) ΕΑΛΜΗϹ ΚΑϹϹΙΑΝΟΥ ΥΟΥ Μ[Ε]ΛΕΝΑΙΟΥ ΙΡΡΕΥϹ (c) ΡωΜΑΙωΝ ΤΟΝ (d) ΡΗΙΛΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΡΡΟϹΤΑΤΗΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΗΟΡΗ.. ΜΗΝΕΙ ΞΑΝΔΙΚω.

III. 11. ϹΕΒΤΙΜ[ΙΟΝ ΟΥΟΡωΔΗΝ] ΤΟΝ ΚΡΑ[ΤΙϹΤΟΝ ΕΡΙΤΡΟ]ΡΟΝ ϹΕΒΑϹ[ΤΟΥ ΔΟΥΚ]ΗΝΑΡΙΟΝ ΚΑ[Ι ΑΡΟΑΡΕ] ΤΗΝ [Page 168]ΙΟΥΛΙΟΤΗ ΑΥ[ΡΗΛΙ]ΟϹ Ε[ΑΛΜΗϹ] ΡΥΙΛϹΟϹ Μ[ΕΛΕΝΑΙ]ΟϹ ΜΑΛωΧΑ ΝΑϹϹΟΥΜΟ[Υ] Ο ΚΡΑΤΙϹΤΟϹ ΤΟΝ [ΡΗΙΛΟΝ]. ΚΑΙ ΡΡΟϹΤΑΤΗΝ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΕΝΕΚΕΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ .... [ΜΗ­ΝΕΙ Ξ]ΑΝΔΙΚω.

IV. 12. ϹΕΡΤΙΜΙΟΝ ΑΙΡΑΝΗΝ ΟΔΑΙ­ΝΛΤΗϹΥ ΤΟΝ ΛΑΜΡΡΟΤΑΤΟΝ ϹΥΝ­ΚΛΥΙΚΟΝ.

V. 13. ΕΞΑ ...... ΝΤωΝ ΑΥΡΗΛΙ .... ΡΗΛΙΟΔωΡ ..... ϹΤΡΑΤΙωΤΗϹ ΛΕ ...... ΚΗϹ ΤωΝ ΡΑΤΡωΝ ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΚΑΙ ΕΥ­ΧΑΡΙϹΤΙΑϹ ΧΑΡΙΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΓΞΡΗ.

VI. 14. ... ΥΡΙΛΙΟΝ ΟΥΟΡωΔΗΝ [ϹΥΝ­ΚΛ]ΗΤΙΚΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΒΟΥΛΕΥΤΗΝ ΡΑΛΜΥΡΗΝΟΝ ΒΗΛΑ ΚΑΒΟϹΑΡϹΑ ΤΟΝ ΡΗΙ[ΛΟΝ] ΤΕΙΜΗϹ ΧΑΡΙΝ Ε ΤΟΥϹ ΟΡΗ.

VII. 15. ΜΑΛΕΝΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΓΡΙΡΡΑΝ ΙΑΡΑΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΡΑΑΙΟΥ ΓΡΑΜΜΑ­ΤΕΔ ΓΕΝΟΜΕΝΟΝ ΤΟ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΝ ΕΡΙΔΗΜΙ[Α] ΤΗΕΟΥ ΑΔΡΙΑΝΟΥ Α­ΛΙΜΜΑ [Page 169]ΡΑΡΑϹΧΟΤΑ ΞΕΝΟΙϹ ΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΡΟΛΕΙΤΑ[ΙϹ.]

ΕΝΗ ... Ν ΥΡΗΡΕΤΗϹΑΝΤΑ ΤΗΤ ......... [...]ΤΕΥΜΑ ΤΟΥ ........ ΥΡΟ ... ΕΚΑΙ ...... ΤΟΝ ΝΑΟΝ ΤΟΝ .... ΔΙΟϹ .... ΝΤωΤ ......

VIII. Arsoffae in Monasterio Maronitarum. 16. † ΕΡΙ ΕΕΡΓΕ ΕΡΙΕΚ o. ΤΕ ΕΥΝ­ΓΕΝ̄ ΜΑΡωΝΙΕ ΤΕ ΧωΡΕΡΙΕΚ o.

III. Anathemata. 17. ΔΙΙ ΥΡΣΙϹΤω ΜΕΓΙϹΤω ΚΑΙ ΕΡΗ­ΚΟω ΒωΛΑΝΟϹ ΖΗΝΟΒΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΑΙΡΑΝΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΟΚΙΜΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΘΘΑ ΕΡΙΜΕΛΕΤΗϹΟΗ ΑΙΡΕΘΕΙϹ ΕΡΗΚΑϹ ΡΗΓΗϹ ΥΡΟ ΙΑΡΙΒωΛΟΥ ΘΕΟΥ ΤΟΝ Βω[ΜΟΝ] ΕΞ ΙΔΙωΝ ΑΝΕ­ΘΗΚΕΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΔΟΥ ΜΗΝΟϹ ΥΡΕΡ­ΒΕΡΕΤΑΙΟΥ Κ.

IV. VOTA. Tievae. 18. ΔΙΙ ΜΕΓΙϹΤω ΚΕΡΑΥΝΙω ΥΡΕΡ Ϲω­ΤΗΡΙΑϹ ΤΡΑ. ΑΔΡΙΑΝΟΥ ϹΕΒ .... ΤΟΥ ΚΥΡΙΟΥ ΑΓΑΤΗΑΝΓΕΛΟϹ ΑΒΙΛΗΝΟϹ ΤΗϹ ΔΕΚΑΡΟΛΕΟϹ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΜΑΡΑΝ ωΚΟΔΟΜΗϹΕΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΚΛΙΝΗ .... ΕΞ ΙΔΙωΝ ΑΝΕΤΗΗΚΕΝ ΕΤΟΥϹ ΕΜΥ ΜΗΝΟϹ ΛωΟΥ.

V. Imperatorum Memoriae. 19. ........ es Orbis & Propaga­tores Generis Humani, D. D. N. N. Dio­cletianus ......... ssimi Impp. & Con­stantius, & Maximianus Nobb. Caes. Castra feliciter condiderunt.

....... ntes Ossiano Hieroclete V.P. Praes. Provinciae D. N. M. O. eorum.

Briadenae.

ΑΡΗΙΕΡωΘΗ ΑΑΙ ΛΙΝΔΙΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΑΜΡΗ ΕΤΟΥϹ

ΔΙΑ ΜΑΤΕΡΝΟΥ Κ[ΑΙ Ρ]ΑΡΡΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΙΚΟΥ ΚΝΕΤΜΝ.

—Υ—Ν

Andrenae.

I. ΙΕΥΞΑΜΕΝΟϹ ΕΓω ΙωΑΝΝΗϹ ΕΡΕ­ΤΥΧΑ — ΚΑΙ ΕΥΧΑΡΙϹΤωΝ Τω Θω ΡΡΟϹ — ΕΝΙΚΑ ΥΡΕΡ ΤωΝ ΑΜΑΡ­ΤΙωΝ ΜΟΝ.

II. Ad Portam Australem. ΑΥΤΗ Η ΡΥΛΗ ΤΔ ΚΥΡ .. ΔΙΚΑΙΟΙ ΕΙΕΕΛΕΥΕΟΝΤΑΙ ΕΝ ΑΥΓΗ.

III. Ad Portam Occidentalem. Χ ΘΜΓ Γ

IV. ΥΡΙΟΝ ΡΟΝ ΜΙΧΑΗΛ.

V. ΙΑΥΤΙ... ΛΙΚΑ ...

VI. .. ΡΙΟϹ ΤωΝ Δ [...]ΥΝΑΜΕ ... ΗΜωΝΑΝ ΤΙΛΗΜΡΙ ΘΕΟΕ ΙΑΚω ΒΤ.

VII. ΑΥΞΙΤωΝ.

VIII. + ΕΛ ✚ΕΕΚΙ.

IX. ΕΛΙΕ.

X. ΖψΗ.

THE APPENDIX.

HAving finish'd my pri­mary Task, I shall apply my self to some other Considerations of a similar na­ture; which I was unwilling to interweave with the thread of the History, that the Dis­course might appear uniform, and all of a piece: I have therefore reserved for this Appendix such Critical Ob­servations as I had made up­on the Names of the Place, and of the Inhabitants, with [Page 174]the Honorary Offices which the Men of Eminence bore in the City: To which I have added an Account of their Idolatry; with a short separate History of Vabal­lathus and Longinus, two Great Men of Pal­myra; intending to con­clude the Dissertations with some Remarks upon the In­scriptions found among the Ruines of this once Illustrious City.

CHAP. I. Of the Names Tadmur, and Palmyra.

THE preceding History having given an Account of the Foun­dation of Palmyra, I shall in this Chapter account for the Names which were given it, in the Syriac Language Tadmur, but in the Greek Palmyra, (says Josephus.)

And first of Tadmur, [...], in the Hebrew, 2 Chron. 8.34. [...], as the Septuagint. Or as the Alexandrian Copy, much nearer to the Original, [...]. The F. Harduin therefore very ineptly, in his Notes on Pliny, calls it Theudemer; and Josephus as inartificially, [...]. It must be confest, that St. Hierom, in Ezek. 47. (and he is followed by Monsieur Spon, and others) affirms, that Thamar in the Prophet, who is stating the Limits of Judaea to the South, is no other than Tadmur; Hie verò terminus plagae [Page 176]australis; h. e. meridianae, incipit à Thamar, quae urbs in solitudine est, quam & Solomon miris operibus instruxit, & hodiè Palmyra nuncupatur, Hebreóque sermone Thamar dicitur, quae in linguâ nostrâ Palma sonat: And I was once en­clinable to have corrected the Transla­tion of the Septuagint from the He­brew; and instead of what we now read, [...], to have read, [...]. from Thamar, the City of Palm-Trees, or Palmyra: But I have since altered my Opinion, because Thamar is exprefly said to be the Bor­der of Judaea to the South, whereas Palmyra lies near directly East from Jerusalem, and am apt to believe that St. Hierom was deceived by the like sig­nification of the words; Tamar in He­brew (not Tadmur) signifying a Palm-Tree, while Palmyra is not allowed to be of a Roman, but Greek Original; and if so, cannot be derived from Palma, a pure Latin word; and that the Sep­tuagint read the Text aright, Theman being toward the South of Judaea, Theman, says the Targum of Jonathan, [Page 177]i. e. Jericho, a Town (says Eusebius de Locis Hebr.) 15 Miles distant from Pe­tra in Arabia, and is, in the Old Testa­ment, often put for the whole Countrey South of Judaea; the [...] in the Sep­tuagint being not far distant from it, as Strabo ( l. 16. p. 259.) affirms, ‘That Petra is the Metropolis of Arabia Na­bataea; That the Countrey round it is Desart, especially towards Judaea; That it is situate three or four Days Jour­ney from Jericho, and five from the Palmetum, or City of Palm-Trees, as I would render it.

I was also once of the Opinion, that Palmyra had its Denomination from the Palm-Trees, as St. Jerom says expresly, though Tadmur be not a word of that signification, (but seems to me to be derived rather from [...] implying its admirable and stupendous Situation, probably because a fertile Spot of Ground in the midst of a vast Desart.) But because Josephus seems to deter­mine it to be of Greek Original, I can­not think it derived from [...], an Aegyptian Deity; for what had the Gods of Aegypt to do near the Banks of Euphrates? nor from [...], a King or Father; but from [...], which [Page 178]signifies a Persian Shield; or Parma, as the Latins render it, ( Hesych. [...], Glossar. Vet. [...].) For the Palmyrenians were near Neighbours to the Persians, while at a great distance from either Rome or Egypt, and from them with whom they maintain'd a continual Commerce, might receive the Name of their City, which very well agrees to a strong Frontier Town, built for the de­fence of the Borders; and this exactly quadrates with the Arabick [...] Damar, Praesidium. And we may as well derive Palmyrene from a Persick Origi­nal, as the neighbouring Province Os­rhoene (the two Provinces being often confounded, for Photius Cod. [...]. styles Zenobia [...], The Queen of Osrhoene,) which was without any dispute so denominated from Os­roes (or Chosroes) the King of that Country, Procop. l. 1. Pers. c. 17. p. 49. and a Confederate of the Per­sians, who gave his Name to Edessa, and the Territory round it. For I cannot be of the mind of Malela, though he seems, by his often mentioning it, Par. 1. p. 182. Par. 2. p. 153. to be fond of his Etymology, that it was called Palmyra, [...], [Page 179]because it was the Place where Goliath received his Fate at the Hands of King David; though the Humour of giving Names to Cities or Countreys, from such Fabu­lous Encounters, hath not been altoge­ther disus'd; for says Damascius ( apud Phod. Cot. 242.) some affirmed, that his Native City, Damascus, was so cal­led from Ascus, a Giant whom Jupiter there overcame, ( [...]:) And, I fear, some of our Histo­rians, zealous for the Honour of Brute, will be found guilty of the same Crime.

But though I cannot believe the Fi­ction of David's slaying Goliath at Pal­myra, yet it is very probable, that that stout and victorious Prince might have extended his Empire as far as Palmyra, Bechart. Spanhem. Hist. Job. & Hyde Not. in Abr. Peritzol. p. 60. when he invaded Hadad-Ezer King of Soba, (2 Sam. 8.3. 1 Chron. 18.3.) the Eu­phrates being the Eastern Limit of Syria Sobah (from beyond which River Ha­dad-Ezer brought his Auxiliaries, i. e. from Mesopotamia, 2 Sam. 10.16. there called Syria beyond the River,) as Da­mascus was the Western: And Palmyra is said, 2 Chron. 8.3, 4. to be situated in Hamath Soba, or Syria Soba; and the two Cities of Arabia the Desart, Sabe [Page 180]and Barathena in Ptolomy, seem to be Soba and Berothai, Cities of the Sabe­ans, mention'd in the Sacred Writings.

Castaldus and Ortelius affirm that Pal­myra is now called Amegara; but Sanson says it is called Faid, as do Nicolosius in his Hercules Siculus, Par. 3. P. 263. and others; where­as it still retains its old Denomination Tadhmur, as it always did among the Syrians and Arabs. L. 2. p. 72. The old Geographer of Ravenna reckons it among the Cities of Caele-Syria, (for so I will adventure to correct that Author, Syria Cilensin Comagenis, which Monsieur Porcheron reads Syria Seleucis, but it should be read Syria Cele in Comagenis,) but calls it Malmiora, which the Editor says is mistaken for Palmyra, and with him I agree. Tho' perhaps Tamira in the same Author may be set for Tadmira (as Hepolis for Heliopolis) for that Geogra­pher lived in the 7th Century, Ib. when that City having fallen into the Hands of the Arabs, had recover'd its ancient Syriack, or Arabick Name.

I have in the History affirm'd, from the Authority of Lib. 1. Censibus. Ʋlpian, that Caracalla made Palmyra a Colony Juris Italici; but if I might be allowed a Conjecture, I could think, that Septimius Severus [Page 181]made it a Colony, as he did several o­ther Cities in that Country, Rhesaina, Tyrus, Laodicea, Nisibis, and Singara, which from his Name were stiled in the Coins Septimia Rhesaina, Colonia Septi­mia Tyrus, Septimia Colonia Laodicea, Septimia Colonia Nisibis, (or as it is al­ways in the Coins, [...],) but that his Son Caracalla gave it the Priviledges of an Italian City, as Ʋlpian affirms; for it seems to me past all doubt, from the frequent use of the Names Septimius, and Septimia, by the Inhabitants of Pal­myra, who gave it as a Praenomen to the People of both Sexes, of the best Fami­lies and Condition, that the Citizens of Tadmur had a very reverend regard for the Emperor Septimius Severus; but we want Coins to determine this Question.

In an Inscription, about the Year 296. Pag. 99. Journal. (for I am willing to supply the Date from the former Inscription, pag. 98. because they both treat of the same Person) Tadmur is called [...], as if it were the Mother of other Colo­nies, says the Editor, (a word that oc­curs not in any Author) which was a very honourable appellation, Thucyd. l. 1. § 25. p. 15. Ed. Ox. cum Schol. the Colo­nies being obliged [...] ( i. e. [...]) to [Page 182]Honour their Mother City, and to give it the Preference the Law had appoin­ted; but the word should be divided in­to [...], i. e. [...] and [...], Palmyra being both a Metropolis and a Colony, as were several other Cities in Syria, as appears from the Coins. Colo­nia Damascus Metropolis. [...]. Sephyrus Metropolis Co­lonia. Tyrus Metropolis Colonia.

Now, though to be a Roman Colony, was a great Honour, and entitled the City to great Priviledges; yet it must be acknowledged that it left the City deprived of its former unlimited Liber­ty: for in time past it was govern'd by its own Statutes; Agel. lib. 16. c. 13. Harduin. Antirrhet. p. 37, 52. but when made a Co­lony, was under the Roman Jurisdiction, paid Submission to their Laws, and Tri­bute to the Emperors, from which it was before exempt; and if a Frontier Town, as Palmyra was, it admitted of a Roman Garrison (the First Legion of the Illyrians being posted there) with the Liberty reserv'd to the Citizens, that they were to be Listed as Romans into their Legions, not as Auxiliaries.

In the Ecclesiastick Notitia, Palmyra was at first a Metropolitan, as long as it was the Chief City of the Province, [Page 183] i. e. till its Destruction by Aurelian. At the Division of the Empire by Con­stantine the Great, it was a Suffragan See under the Archbishop of Damascus, who, in the Sixth Act of the Council held at Chalcedon, thus subscribes for the Bishops of his Province, [...], &c. From whence also it appears that that Church was Orthodox in those days; and that Palmyra was the first of the Suffragans to that Metropolitan; but af­terward it became subject to the Metro­politan of Edessa, as appears by the Noti­tia of the Emperor Leo; since which time it hath no longer a place in the Ecclesiasti­cal Account, Christianity having been, for some Ages, totally banisht from Palmyrene

Whether the Merchants, who Tra­vell'd from Syria to Seleucia, Strab. lib. 16. p. 747. and Baby­lon, thro' the Country of the Arabes Scenitae, thro' the Malii, and their De­sarts, and Ferried over the Euphrates near Anthemusia in Mesopotamia, a City Situate near the river Aborrhas, took Palmyra in their way, I cannot deter­mine; nor whether Alexander the Great marcht his Army thro' or by that City, [Page 184]when having left Egypt, and past thro' Phaenicia to Thapsacus, he carried his Troops over the Euphrates; since none of the Writers of the Atchievements of that Miraculous Prince take any no­tice of Palmyra; tho' it be to me un­questionable, that Palmyra submitted to that irresistible Conqueror, as did many other Cities, of whom the Historians make not any mention.

The Situation of the City, as to its Longitude and Latitude, is differently accounted for by the Writers of the Country, the Arabs (as the very Learn­ed Dr. Hyde informs me) Ismael Abul-Feda, Geograph. M.S. the Prince of Hamah. i. e. of that part of Syria, wherein Tadmur was Si­tuate, (who was Born in the Year 672. of the Mahometan Aera, and constituted the Lord of the Country in the Year 710. of the same Computation) con­fesses, that his Country-men, who make it part of Arabia, are not agreed, three several Authors placing it in different degrees.

  • The first fixes it in Long. 67.40. Lat. 34.00.
  • The second in Long. 67. 40. Lat. 30.00.
  • The third in Long. 64.00. Lat. 33.50.

But Calcashendi, T [...]n. 1. p. 321. another Arabian Author, gives this Account out of other [Page 185]Writers, as the Excellent Master of the Oriental Languages, Dr. Hyde Tran­slates him— ‘As for the Territory of Tadmur— the Author of the Book Al Tarîph says, it is Situate between the Two Villages and Rahba, and is reckon'd to be in Arabia, in the fourth of the Seven Climes: The Author of the Book of Longitudes says, its Lon­gitude is 62 degrees, and its Latitude 34 degrees. The Lord of Hamath (i. e. Abulpheda) says, it belongs to the Territory of Hems (i. e. Emesa) on the East-side of it, and that most of its Soil is saltish; that in it there is a sort of soure Plant called Nagjel, and also Olives. There are likewise very great, and Ancient Ruins, con­sisting of Pillars, and Rocks, and a Castle with a Wall. The Author of the Book, called, Al Raud Almîtar says, that it was Originally an Anci­ent City, which the Spirits Built for Solomon, with extraordinary Fortifi­cations. It was called Tadmur from Tadmur the Daughter of Hassân, whose Sepulchre is there, and Solo­mon did Inhabit it after her. The Au­thor of the Book Al-Azîzi saith, that between Tadmur and Damascus are 59 [Page 186]Miles; between Tadmur and Rahba 102 Miles. The Lord of Hamath says, it is from Hem's about three Stations.’ The only difference in the Accounts is in this, that the Longitude of Palmyra in words at length, out of the Book of Longitudes, is 62. which in Abulpheda's Geography is 67. where it is exprest in Letters; which must be attributed to the Carelesness of the Transcribers.

I was a little surpriz'd, when reading Al Edrisi (commonly, but wrongly, call'd the Nubian Geographer) I found a Tademyr in Spain, which comprehend­ed the Kingdoms of Murcia and Tarra­gon, and was enclined to believe that the Caliph sent a Colony from the Syrian Tadmur (as well as from the other Cities of his vast Dominions) to People Spain, when he had conquer'd it, who from their own Native City gave the Name to that part of Spain: But my Learned and much honoured Friend Dr. Bernard, has inform'd me, that the Spanish Tade­mir may be derived, as to Name, and no otherwise, from the Syrian Tadmor, or from [...], Tadmera, Mescella Po­puli, from a mixture of several Nations inhabiting there; as Tidal, in Holy Writ, is called the King of the Nations; [Page 187]and Galilee stiled Galilee of the Gentiles.

The Arabs of this Age say, that in ancient time Solomon Ebn el Doud (or the Son of David) built a City in that Place, which being destroyed, was re­edify'd by a strange People; and the present Inhabitants pretend to show you the top of a Mountain where one of So­lomon's Concubines lies buried, as if that Great King had fix'd his Court there, ha­ving destin'd it to his Retirement and Pleasures, as Josephus seems to affirm.

CHAP. II. Of the Names of the Palmyrenians.

FRom the Names of the City, I shall proceed to consider the Names of the Inhabitants, and I question not, but as their first Language was Hebrew, or Syriack, so the People had Syriack, or He­brew Names. This wants no further Confirmation, the Inscriptions put it past all doubt, Odenathus, Airanes, Va­ballathus, Mocimus, Orodes, Zabdas, Mat­thas, Jaribolus, &c. being all pure Sy­riack; and had the Curiosity of our En­glish Travellers directed them to have [Page 188]transcribed the Syriack Inscriptions, as well as the Greek, at Tadmur; I doubt not, but as we might from them have retrieved the old Syriack Alphabet, so we also might have been enabled to correct more than one Mistake either of the Graver, or Transcriber (as I shall unque­stionably demonstrate there are such) in the Names of the People of that famous City. This Method, I doubt not, the Palmyrenians made use of, that their publick Monuments, as long as they continued, might preserve the know­ledge of their ancient Native Language; and I hope some attempt will be made to recover at least the understanding of their Letters: For Monsieur Petit's Specimen, in Spon's Miscellanies, is all Dream; and that Learned Man, if he had been in Earnest, would doubtless have given us his Alphabet, and the In­scriptions accordingly reduc'd into the Hebrew, or some other known Chara­cter. 'Tis true, he says they are the Phaenician (probably the same with the old Syriack) Letters, (for Gruter's Opi­nion, that they are Arabick, is not to be defended,) but I refer the Reader to An­tony Gallandius's Confutation of Mr. Pe­tit, in the same Miscellanies.

After the Romans had extended their Empire into the remoter Parts of Syria; the Men of Palmyra, agreeable to the Practice of the other Nations of the East, assumed to themselves a Prae-No­men, the Custom of having Two Names having been taken up by the Greeks and Syrians about the Times of Trajan; and this seems to be confirm'd by the Sepulchral Inscriptions at Tadmur, N. 3, 4. the most ancient of which were erected under Trajan, where the Names of Elabelus, Mannaeus, Soraechus, Malchus, Vaballathus, Gichus, Mocimus, stand alone, without any Prae-nomina; but in the Inscriptions of After-times, Sep­timius, Rupilius, Julius Aurelius, fre­quently occur, which being Roman, were prefix'd to their Syriack Names, (as some of them had two Syriack Names, the last having probably been givent to those who were adopted into other Families, as Phanius Mocimus, qui & Airanes, Julius Aurelius Zeno­bius qui & Zabdilas—) the Fore-Name Septimius was in very frequent use at Tadmur, probably in Honour of Sep­timius Severus the Emperor, their Be­nefactor: The First of their Empe­rors was Septimius Odenathus; their [Page 190]only Empress, Septimia Zenobia; their Great Men, Septimius Orodes, and Sep­timius Airanes. Now, the Prae-Nomen being either Greek or Roman, the second the proper Syriack Name of the Person, was post-pon'd to that, which was as­sum'd, ex. gr. Septimius Zenobius, Lon­ginus Cassimus, Julius Aurelius Zenobi­us, Alexander Capadetus, Julius Aurelius Ealmes (if it should not rather be read Palmes, for he is said to be a Roman, and a Gentleman of one of their Troops: Now, Palma is a known Name among the Romans; Palma, the Consul and the Lieutenant-General to Trajan, in his Parthian Expedition, is very famous, who being of a contrary Faction to Adrian, Spart. Hadr. p. 2, 4. was slain at Terracina, by the Order of the Senate.) And for this reason, I cannot agree with the Learned Mr. Halley, correcting the Coins of Vaballathus, and reading Airanes for Hermeias; for it's plain, that in those Names the first is Greek, or Latin, the latter Syriack; which also confirms me in my Opinion, that Vaballathus was the Son of Herodes (or Herodianus) and that the Father's Name was Athenas He­rodes; of which more hereafter.

It is also observable, that the Palmy­renians, [Page 191]like their Neighbours the Arabs, with their own Names gave their Pe­digree, reckoning up their Ancestors, many times, to their Great-Grand-Father: This the Saracenic History puts out of all dispute as to the Arabs; and the Inscriptions, as to the Inhabi­tants of Tadmur.

Now to shew that the Names are of Syriack or Hebrew Extraction, as the prae Nomina of Greek or Latin, is an easie Undertaking. Jaribolus, or Ja­riboleus, is Jerubbaal ( Gideon's Name;) Bareiches is Barachias, Baruchus, Tom. 3. Mon. Graec. p. 346. or Ba­rachus, (of which Name were Baruch the Prophet Jeremy's Scribe; and a Bishop, [...], and Borochus the Judge in Jamblichus) Ouorodes is Orodes, and Herod; Sorae­chus, Saruch, Nahar's Father, Gen. 11. and in Jamblicus's Apud. Phot. Cod. 94. Babylonicks, Sorae­chus, the Son of Soraechus the Publican, makes a considerable Figure; Simon is purely Hebrew; Vaballathus is Ba­lathus with the Arabick Praefix; Bal, Belus, Bolathus, and Balathus, the same Name in Damascius; Ballatha is the Name of a Syrian City, in Ptolemy; and Sanballat ( i. e. the Prince Bal­lathus) appears, in Holy Writ, the Go­vernor [Page 192]of Mesopotamia, [...], Nehem. 2.9. and Vabal­lathus, in Vopiscus, is called Balbatus, for Ballathus. Euseb. l. 7. c. 30. Bolanus was one of the Bishops, who, in the Synod of Antioch, condemn'd Paulus of Samosata. Mat­thas among the Men, and Martha a­mong the Women, are also Hebrew; Matthas, Matthat, Matthan, Matta­thas; Airanes, Aarones; Jaraius, Jair; Elabelus is Elbelus, or the God Bel— sometimes Alagbelus, Alagabalus, cor­ruptly Heliogabalus. Mannaeus is the same Name with Manoah, Judg. 13.2. or, as the LXX. [...], or Manahath, 1 Chron. 1.40. Zenobius was a common Name among the Phaenicians and Syrians. L. 8. c. 13. Eusebius mentions two Martyrs of that Name, who suffer'd in the Dio­clesian Persecution, the one an admi­rable Physician, the other a Presby­ter of the Church of Sidon. Against Zenobius of Emesa, Phot. [...]od. 228. Ephremius the Pa­triarch of Antioch wrote a Learned Treatise. And Zenobius a Bishop of Cilicia was Martyr'd in the same Per­secution, with his Wife, and his Sister Zenobia, says Simeon Metaphrastes; and the Wife of Basiliscus the Emperor was also call'd Zenobia. Malech, Malchus, [Page 193]and Malchion (of which Name was an Eminent Id. l. 7. c. 29. Presbyter of Antioch, who oppos'd Paulus of Samosata the Here­tical Patriarch of that See) are from the same Original; as is Malechus Po­dosaces, who was the Prince (or Phy­larchus) of the Arabians, Am. Mar­cel. l. 24. in the times of the Emperor Julian; and Melham, the Name of the late Prince of Tadmur, who treated the English Merchants with so much Injustice. Zebeidas Zabdas, and Zabdilas, are the same; of which Name were Zabdas Bishop of Jerusalem after Hymenaeus, and Zabdi ( Josh. 7.3.) while the ignorant Transcribers of the Histo­rian Vopiscus have turn'd Zenobia's Ge­neral Zabdas into a Woman, ( Vopisc. p. 217. contra Zenobiam, & Zabam ejus Sociam.) Samsus, Samson, [...] in the LXX. are of the same Original; and from thence is Sampsa (or [...]) Esdr. 4.8. and Sam­saiceramus one of the Princes of Syria under Pompey, another of that Name, being the Priest of Venus under Gallienus; and Sampsa a City in Arabia, says Stephanus, [...]. And Epiphan. Haer. 53. [...]. And [Page 194]in the same Stephanus, [...].

Odaenathus is also of a Syrian Family; of which Name was a Philosopher, the Scholar of the Junior Plutarch, says Suidas out of Damascius ( [...]) who ought to be re­membred, Vid. [...]. if only for that one excel­lent Sentence of his, That it is very difficult, and next to impossible, for Men either to think or speak of God, as He is. John Malela always calls the Emperor Enathus; and he, being of Antioch, may have been presumed to have understood the Language, Names and Manners of his own Country, De Marty­rib. Palaest. p. 333. Syria. And Eusebius, among the Martyrs of Palestine, who suffer'd in the Dioclesian Persecution, reckons Ennathas a Woman of Scytho­polis. And I have been enclined to be­lieve, that Enathus and Ignatius were the same Name ( Ignatius only better turn'd to please the Ear of the Greeks and Romans,) and that, in Honour of Odae­nathus, Gallienus assum'd the Name, who, in two rare Coins in Monsieur Pag. 413. Patin, and as rare an Inscription in In H. A. Script. p. 509. Fulvius Ʋrsinus, is styled Publius Li­cinius Ignatius Gallienus; or as F. Har­duin, [Page 195]p. 330. from another Coin, Eg­natius.

As to the Name Mocimus, I have been under suspence, whether I should cor­rect the Books from the Monuments, or believe that the Transcriber of the Inscriptions might mistake a K for an N, which letters are not of a very diffe­rent make, and turn and read Monimus for Mocimus. Apud Ju­lian. Orat. IV. p. 281. Jamblichus, who was born at Chalcis, not far from Edessa, says, that Monimus was the Mercury of the People of Edessa: And Apud Phot. Cod. [...]. Damascius, in the Life of Isidore the Philosopher, says that Jamblichus derived himself from Monimus and Sampsaiceramus, the Roytelets of Syria; V. [...]. and the Criticks have corrected Stephanus, [...]. reading [...] for [...]. But since the Name occurs so often in the Inscriptions at Palmyra, and is al­ways written [...], I am enclined to think that that was the right read­ing, and ought not to be alter'd, and that from thence Jamblichus and others are to be corrected.

Nor is it to be omitted, that the Pal­myrenians, as well as other Nations, gave the Names of their Gods to their Princes, [Page 196]and Illustrious Persons, as appears by the frequent use of Jaribolus, Mocimus, Vaballathus, Elabelus, and Sampsaice­ramus, among them; as of Adonijah, and Elijah, &c. among the Jews; of Belshazzar, and Nebuchadnezzar, among the Babylonians; of Mithrobarzanes, and Mithradates, among the Persians; of Taautus, Serapion, Heracles, Hera­clammon, Ammonius, Isidorus, Psamma­tosiris, Orus, Orion, &c. among the Aegyptians; of Cronius, Posidonius, He­phestion, Dionysius, Apollos, among the Greeks; of Ithobalus, and Abibalus, a­mong the Yyrians; of Annibal, Asdr [...] ­bal, and Maherbal, among the Cartha­ginians; of Saturninus, Jovianus, Mar­tius, Mercurialis, and Venerius, among the Romans. And in like manner the Custom prevailed over the Northern, and other Nations, as might easily be proved.

CHAP. III. Of their Publick Offices.

FRom the Names of the Inhabitants, I proceed to consider the several Officers that managed the Affairs of the Commonwealth; for the Senate, in whose hands the Government was, and to whom was the Dernier Resort, constituted se­veral Officers for the due Administra­tion of the Duties of Religion and Justice.

[...].

And because the Eastern Nations were much addicted to Idleness, and great Lovers of Diversion (few of the Turks, Arabs or Persians of the present Age being enclinable to hard labour, most of their time being spent in smoak­ing Tabacco, and drinking Coffee,) in­somuch that they too often prefer'd their voluptuous Satisfactions (for they spent thirty Nights together in con­tinued Revellings) to their Safety; Maleld. 1. p. 313. (for when Sapores, after he had made Va­lerian his Prisoner, sackt the City of Antioch, they were so intent and busied [Page 198]in seeing the Actors of a Farce, Ammian. l. 3. c. 5. that till one of their Mimicks, turning him round, told them with astonishment, that the Swords of the Persians were at their Throats, they saw nothing of their Danger: Zosim. lib. up. 55. And when the Emperor Au­relian return'd the second time to Pal­myra, he surpriz'd the same Antiochians, so intent upon the sight of their Horse-Races, that when they thought him in Thrace, he was in their Market-place.) I will first treat of their [...], or Aedilis, the Rich and Eminent Per­son, who furnish'd the Money for their Publick Spectacles, and was at the Charge of the Plays, Vid. Ma­lel. l. 9. p. 290. L. 12. p. 272, 273. though they had great Bequests often made to this pur­pose, and sometimes the Expence was defray'd out of the Publick Treasury; (for that they had such an Officer at Tad­mur, the Inscriptions put out of all dis­pute.) Their Original Office, it is true, was like that of our (a) Clerks of the Market (if not at first deputed to inspect the Temples, and their Revenues, and [Page 199]to file the Records,) where they en­quired into whatever was bought or sold, and regulated the Prices; and their number at Athens (says Aristotle, in his Book of that Commonwealth, cited by Harpocration) was Twenty, Five in the Pireaeus, and Fifteen in the City. But that which made them most acceptable to the Common People, was their Secundary Employment, to enter­tain the Citizens with whatever might contribute to their Diversion, upon their own Pocket; and perhaps it often happen'd, Ludos facere Aedi­lem Cic. l. 1. de Orat. argentum ad ludos commodare. l. 28. D. de auro, argento, &c. aediles plebis ludorum maximè gratiâ crea­tos. Vid. Gronov. Ob­serv. l. 4. c. 21. that the same Persons who furnish'd the Expence, was the President, and Judge of the Games (both the [...] and [...],) who, if the whole Pro­vince met (the [...]) was from the Name of the Country call'd the [...], as there were [...], &c. And therefore Ruffi­nus, in his Version of the Martyrdom of St. Polycarp, renders [...], in Eusebius's Greek by Munerarius, the Person who managed the Expence of the Spectacula, very properly.

This Generosity made so deep and lasting an Impression upon the Popu­lace, who are generally led by Ap­pearances, Reinesii-Inscript. class. 6. n. cxxi. and satisfy'd with Show, that they often erected Monuments to the Memory of their Benefactors, for thiS very reason. So the City of Taena­rium (in the Gulf of Sparta) celebrated the Glory of Tiberius Claudius Charito, in this noble Inscription:

[...] f. [...]. [...]. Hoc est. [...]. Subaudi [...].

‘The City of the Taenarians have honoured Tiberius Claudius Charito, their most excellent Citizen, for his great Prudence, and his unspeakable Magnificence, when he was the Aedile (or [...]) of their City. This Monument was erected by the Order and Decree of the Senate.’

[...]d. Gro­ [...]vii me­mor. Cosson. [...]. 146. In like manner Claudius Paulinus was rewarded by the Senate and People of Smyrna (for I conjecture that the Marble found in that City belongs to it) [Page 201]with a noble Monument erected to the Memory of his Daughter; because he he had been the General of their Horse, one of the chief of their Council, their Aedilis, and Questor, and President of their Senate (a) (which last was the highest Civil Honour he could attain to; Plin. Pa­negyric. for even at Rome the Consul presided in the Senate, when the Emperor was present, if the Emperor himself was not Consul.) Thus the City of Antioch erected a Marble Statue in Daphne to Artabanus, one of their Citizens, Malel. par. 1. lib. 12. p. 381. who was the first syriarcha who presided over the Olympick Games celebrated in that City in the Reign of the Emperor Commodus, with this Inscription, To the eternal memory of Artaban.

And thus the Senate and People of Palmyra, among the other Atchieve­ments of Jullus Aurelius Zenobius, and of Septimius Orodes, celebrated them, that they had magnificently and splen­didly [Page 202]discharged this Office; particu­larly Zenobius, that he managed that Province, when he undertook it, with an extraordinary Liberality. For they distinguisht between what was done at the expence of the Publick, and came out of the Treasury, and what was ex­pended by the Officer out of his own Coffers; and themselves took care, if the Commonwealth did not, to record this Circumstance; Transact. p. 99, 103, 109. so Bolanus is said to have built an Altar, [...], at his own charge; and Agathangelus, to have e­rected a Canopy, and a Bed of State, [...]: Vid. pag. 105. And so Septimius is said to have supplied the Company (or Cara­vans of Travellers) [...]. And Mareades, Malel. par. 1. p. 390. who had been one of the Magistrates of Antioch, was, in the Reign of Gallienus, by the Vote of the whole Senate and People, ejected out of the Government; because, whatever Party he was obliged to provide for in the Publick Horse-Races, he not only refused to lay out any Money of his own, but cheated the Publick of what was destin'd by the City to those Di­versions, (the Emperors afterwards Enacting, That whosoever was ap­pointed [Page 203]to inspect the Ludi Circenses, L. 10. tit. 31. §. 20. which was the Office of the Duumviri, and alienated or diverted to another use any part of the Revenue destin'd to that Service, should be obliged to re­fund.) This Disgrace occasion'd his flying to Sapores the King of Persia, in those dissolute Times, to whom he gave an Account of the unhappy State of his Native Countrey, and the Care­lesness of the Inhabitants, which occa­sion'd the ruine of that noble City, as is already mention'd, the Traytor him­self being sacrificed by that very Prince whom he had invited into Syria, to the angry Manes of his abused Country; Beheaded (says Malela,) Burnt alive (says Ʋbi sup. Ammianus Marcellinus.) And Oecono­mic. c. 4. Xenophon, introducing Socrates in­structing Critobulus as to what would be expected from a Man of his Figure and Fortune at Athens, after he had inform'd him, that he must very frequently be at the charge of noble Sacrifices, and magnificent Entertainments and Feasts, he adds, That it would be expected from him, that he would be obliged to keep Horses for the Publick Races ( [...],) and if he should ever refuse so to treat [Page 204]the Citizens, they would punish him as severely as if he had robb'd their Houses. So passionately were the People of those Ages and Countries addicted to the Spectacula, and so much did they think them their due.

[...].

The Senators of Palmyra were Men of Eminence and Condition, and the most Honourable Members of the Re­publick, and therefore are stiled in the Inscriptions ( [...]) Most Illustrious: But of those Sena­tors, some, I conjecture, were a stand­ing Council of State, (as the [...] were at Athens, and in most Common­wealths, some similar Court;) for Ru­pilius Orodes is said to be both a Senator and a Counsellor ( [...]:) So that as the V. Marm. Oxon. n. 46. [...] and [...] were distinguisht at Athens, so at Palmyra the [...] and [...] had their Distinctions. For as the Romans had their Senate, so other Cities had theirs; their Court of Al­dermen, who govern'd the People (their Duumviri representing the Con­suls.) of which Senators some were Eminent and Principal for Authority [Page 205]and Influence; and such, probably, were the [...] at Palmyra, Men who had borne the Office of the Duum­virate, and for that reason were not only of the Senatorian, Memor. Cosson. Marm. 2. p. 140. but Consular Dignity, ( [...] as it is worded in another Inscription.)

The Name [...], it must be con­fest, is commonly given to every Mem­ber of that Court; so the old Glossary. [...], Decurio, Curialis; called De­curiones, because whenever the Colonies, or Municipia, were establisht, and the Government of those Cities first insti­tuted, the Decurio (like our Alderman of the Ward) had his particular Pro­vince appointed, and his Number of Persons, whom he inspected (Nonius Marcel. Decuriones à numero, cui prae­erant, dicebantur,) but the whole Order, or aggregate Body, govern'd all the Inhabitants, and are therefore called, in the Laws, and ancient Histories, Decu­riones Civitatum, Municipiorum, & Co­loniarum. L. 6. Epist. ad Sept. Great care (says Tully) was used in the choice of such Governors, the Names of the Candidates being, be­fore the Election, proposed to the Peo­ple, that they might make their just [Page 206]Exceptions, if they had any, against the Person. When any Publick Busi­ness was to be done, the Senators were solemnly summon'd to the Court; Vid. Not. in Cod. l. 10. T. 31. n. 1. for out of their Body the Duumviri were chosen (who were to be nominated three Months before they entred upon their Province;) as also the Aediles, (and in some Places the Dictators and Praetors,) the Court being obliged to give immediate Notice to every Offi­cer, if absent, whom they had elected: The Inspection of the Treasury was committed to them; they were en­trusted with the Management and Dis­posal of all Bequests, and of the Publick Money; they were to take care that the Granaries should always be full, that the City might not want Bread: They imposed and levied Taxes: In short, the whole Management of the Commonwealth was in their hands.

It must be granted, that the Dis­charge of the Office was very expen­sive, and they were accountable for whatever Publick Money should be embezled or misapplied, Vid. B. Brisso. l. 4. Select. An­tiquit. and were in­cumbred with a troublesom Province; for the Senator was not to leave the [Page 207]City, to go to the Court, either upon the Publick, or his own private Affairs, without leave from the President of the Province: They were prohibited the ap­plying themselves to a Military Employ­ment; and if any Man scrupled to serve his Countrey, after he was chosen, the Law compell'd him for two Years together to do the Office of a Duumvir (unless the Court exempted him, or he had the consent of the Citizens to excuse him;) nor would flying to a Monastery give a Protection; a Religious House was not then a Sanctuary to skreen a Man from Civil Employments. And there­fore in the Nov. 46. Novels of the Emperor Leo (after whose Reign the word doth not occur in the Laws, nor is it to be found in the Basilica) the Office of the Ducurio is styled [...], an Employment very bur­thensom and grievous, and probably, the Person, when chosen, was obliged to give to the Publick Treasury a Summ of Money; it being mention'd Grut. 475.3. as a great Honour done to Titius Chresimus, that for the Merits of his Father, the Senate admitted him into their Society gratuitously, Ob merita Patris honorem [Page 208]Decurinatûs gratuitum decrevit Ordo Decurionum.

But as the Office was thus molested (inasmuch as it was sometimes inflicted as a Punishment for some Offences) so their Privileges were very great, and their Station very honourable; they were exempt from all extraordinary Employments, and from enduring the Torture; were not to be condemn'd to the Mines, not to be Burnt alive, thrown to the Wild Beasts, Crucified, or Beheaded, (but if Criminal, were Imprison'd, and Fetter'd, till the Em­peror had declar'd his Pleasure, and de­termin'd their Fate,) and the Honour was derived to the Family, to the Fa­thers and the Children of the Senators, who were by this means ennobled; the Men of Worth were capable of being chosen Members of the Court at Fif­teen; and if any of them arrived to the Age of Seventy, or prov'd the Fa­ther of Twelve Children, he was ex­cused from the Fatigue, while he en­joyed all the Privileges of a Senator; nor could he be compell'd to go out of the Province, unless in cases of most urgent necessity. Their Body was [Page 209]styled Ordo Decurionum; the Roll in which their Edicts were entred, Al­bum Decurionum; their Habits distin­ctive and ornamental (Decurionalibus Vestimentis Ornatus;) Grut. p. 372.7. their Houses were supplyed with Water upon the Publick Charge (ut Aquae digitus in Domo ejus flueret, commodisque Publicis, Id. 475.3. ac si de­curio frueretur;) and they were ca­pable of the greatest Bequests, above Fifteen hundred Pound having been given by C. Torasius, Grut. p. 279.3. to furnish out the Expence of a great Supper, annually provided on the Birth-day of his Son, for the Ducuriones of the City, and for a Largess in Money to the Poor. And if any generous Person, when dying, left Legacies to the People, they were entrusted with the Disposal, (as appears by the Inscriptions D. F. D. I. P. h. e. Decurionum fide dividenda in publicum.) And if the Emperor resolved to express his Indignation against any People, he denied them the Privilege of being ruled by a Senate of their own Inhabitants, and left their Lives and Fortunes to the Discretion and Integrity of their Go­vernor, who was a Foreigner. Dio. l. 51. p. 451. So Au­gustus punish'd the proud City of Alex­andria; [Page 210]for when he had conquer'd Egypt, he constituted Cornelius Gallus their Governor, but would not permit any Citizen a share in Publick Affairs, while he allowed other Cities their Pri­vileges, ( [...],) and in this state they continued till Septimius Se­verus gave them (the Jus buleutarum) the liberty to be govern'd by their own Citizens; Spartian. Severus, p. 70. and his Son Antoninus put them into the capacity of being chosen Senators at Rome, which, I conjecture, was one of the Privileges of the Decu­riones in the Colonies.

That this Title was very Honourable in the Colony of Palmyra, appears from Sextus Rufus, who calls Odenathus, be­fore he assum'd the Purple, by the Name of Decurio Palmyrenus, which Trebellius Pollio explains by Princeps Civitatis; for the Senators were the principal Men of the Cities where they resided.

[...].

In Imitation of the Roman Methods of Government, the Palmyrenians had [Page 211]also their Procuratores Ducenarii; of which Order was Septimius Orodes, un­der Odenathus; and Paulus of Samosata, the Patriarch of Antioch, under Zenobia. The Original of the Office is to be de­duced from the Times of Augustus, who, Sneton. Au­gust. n. 32. for the better and more regular go­vernment of his Subjects to the three Courts of Judicature, which had been formerly erected, added a fourth, styled Decuria Ducenariorum of an inferior Order, the Judges whereof, at their first Institution, were appointed to determine Causes of less moment, but were in process of time advanced to a nobler Jurisdiction; they were commonly Men of Quality, of the Equestrian Dig­nity, though sometimes Liberti, (but in those days the Emperors Freed-Men made no contemptible Figure in the Commonwealth,) the Custom, before the Reign of Augustus, was, Dio. l. 53. p. 506. that every Officer furnisht the Expence of his Em­ployment without any Charge to the Publick, but that wise and munificent Prince considering the Temptations such Officers, who were no way provided for out of the Exchequer, were exposed to, appointed every one his Salary: And [Page 212]from hence the Ducenarii had their Name, and not from their collecting the Tribute of the Provinces, and the Summs which they exacted (the Du­centesima) though that was a part of their Business, as of the Proconsul, where he presided, but from the Pension, which by the Imperial Constitution was to be paid them (which Capitolinus calls Du­cenum H. S. stipendium, as the Law mentions the Procuratores Centenarii and Sexagenarii for the same reason.) For this Dio avers expresly, whatever some learned Men affirm to the con­trary, Ʋbi sup. [...] the Salary being proportion'd to the Quality of the Person and his Employment; the Summ being limited as well as the Office: For the Procu­rator was not permitted to levy Sol­diers, nor to raise larger Taxes upon the Provincials, than were appointed by the Emperor, or Senate; he was obligede to resign, whenever required; [Page 213]and not to lingerin the Province after his time was expir'd, but to return to Rome in three Months.

In a few Years their Authority was enlarged, became great and illustrious; Tacit. An­nal. 12. Claudius obliged the Senate to enact it, That whatever was determin'd by the Emperor's Procurator, should be lookt on as valid, as if himself had decided the Controversie in Person. And when the Senate had Past it as an Act, L. 1. D. de Offic. Proc. Caes. it was reckon'd among the Laws of the Em­pire. The Office was seldom bestow'd on a private Person, unless of extraor­dinary Merit, but upon a Man of Emi­nence, and a Favourite of the Empe­ror's: Id. Vit, Agric. He was impowered to inspect all Publick Affairs; but the proper Busi­ness of the Procurator, was to over-see the Publick Revenue; his Office in the Province entitling him to the same Charge that the Praefecti Aerarii (the Lords of the Treasury) had at Rome; and it was a step to the Senatorian Dig­nity, as that was many times to the Imperial; Capitolin. Pertinax, p. 54. for Pertinax was the Procu­rator Ducenarius in Dacia, before he assum'd the Purple. Their Title was [...], as appears by the Inscrip­tion, [Page 214]and by Holy Writ, (for Festus is, Act. 26.25. call'd [...].) They had their Guards to protect them ( [...]) says E. H. 7.30. Eusebius, their Retinue was great, and their Atten­dance numerous; sometimes they re­presented the Presidents of the Pro­vinces ( Procurator Caesaris Vice Praesidis Provinciae fungetur, says the Law; and the old Inscriptions Grut. p. 376. Procur. August. & Proleg. Provinciae Rhetiae, & Vindelic.) At other times both Offices were uni­ted; for Id. p. 487. 6. P. Vibius was both Procu­rator and Praeses of Sardinia: And whenever the President resided in the Province, the Procurator was his As­sessor in the Courts of Judicature, and had an equal Vote in the Determina­tion of such Causes as were brought before them. This Power of making inspection into all Matters, often en­couraged them to be very troublesom, (insomuch that the Emperor Constanstine the Great thought fit to restrain their Power, and regulate their Exactions;) and they were of old more particularly guilty of molesting the Primitive Chri­stians, whom they persecuted with ex­treme Severity, compelling the weaker [Page 215]sort to Blaspheme, or Compound, while they caused the resolute Confes­sors to be tortured to Death. This the Novatian Commentary in Apud. Phot. Cod. 182. pag. 214. Eulogius demonstrates, that in the Persecution begun by Decius and Valerian, Peren­nius the Ducenarius, by Order of the Emperors, pursued the Christians at Rome, and in the neighbouring Coun­tries, with the greatest severity, mur­dering some, and compelling others to commit Idolatry. About which time, St. Cyprian informs us, Ep. 170. Edit. Oxon. that Martialis and Basilides, two Spanish Bishops, had appear'd before the Procurator Ducena­rius, and had taken out Libels of Secu­rity from him; that they had sacrificed to Idols. And that which supported Paulus of Samosata, Patriarch of Antioch, against the Catholick Church, which had in a Synod solemnly condemn'd him, was, Euseb. 7.10. his Authority of Procurator to Zenobia his Patroness; upon which he valued himself, for it supported his Pride and Grandeur, and therefore chose rather to be called by the Name of Ducenarius, than Bishop, (and ac­cordingly he kept up the state of a Civil Officer, and Minister of Justice, [Page 216]had his Tribunal, and a Sublime Throne, together with his Secretum, ( Secretarium, or Auditorium) Court of Judicatory, in the innermost part of the Praetorium, separated from the rest of the Hall by Railes and Curtains, that being the Place where the Chief Magi­strate used to sit, when he took cogni­zance of Criminal Causes.) And in an old Inscription, Grut. 346.1. Q. Aelius Januarius is said to have been the Procurator of Osroene, and Syria Caele.

But this was not the sole signification of the word Ducenarius; for by it some­times was meant, L. 2. c. 8. one who commanded Two Hundred Men (so says Vegetius) as the Centenarius did One Hundred. And thus Ad Pa­rumach. St. Jerom musters the Offi­cers of a Regiment, Post Tribunum Pri­micerius, deinde Senator, Ducenarius, Biarchus, Circitor, Eques. So the old Glossary, Ducenarius [...]. Dux Ducenarius, in Thes. p. 102. Goltzius. Vir Duce­narius, as Salmasius reads the old In­scription in P. 457. 8. Gruter. Tribunus Mili­taris Legionis Tertiae Italicae; not Du­cenarius Tribuni, as Scaliger says in the excellent Index to that laborious and useful Work; though perhaps the im­perfect [Page 217]words of the Inscription may be supplied, and read Procurator Duce­narius, Tribunus, &c. They are called Protectores Ducenarii in another Inscrip­tion; the [...], Grut. p. 531. 2. Comman­ders of Two Companies of the Life­guards, who of old, as among us, were treated with the Title of Colonels, and accordingly respected and paid: The difference of Title between these Mili­tary Ducenarii and the Procurators consisting in this, that the Office of the former was styled Dignitas Ducentena, of the later Dignitas Du­cenaria.

[...].

Among other Officers of Note and Figure at Palmyra, the [...], or Secretary of the Senate and People, was very eminent; and among others who had been chosen to that Honour, Malech Agrippa is remarkable in the Inscriptions, who a second time ma­naged that Office, when Alexander the Emperor came into Syria.

The Secretaries or Scribes at Rome were very numerous, being divided into [Page 218]their several Classes or Decuriae, Tacit. An­nal. l. 13. their Office obliging them to attend upon the respective Magistrate, to whom they did belong, whether he were the Praetor, Aedile, Quaestor, General of the Fleet, or the High Priest (or the War­dens of the Port at Athens,) for every one of these had his Scriba; the Em­ployment was very honourable, (for the Secretary was very little inferior to the Chief Magistrate, either in Dignity or Authority, being often of the First Rank of the Nobility,) Orat. 8. in Verr. so says Tully, Scribarum Ordo est honestus — quod eorum hominum fidei tabulae publicae, pe­riculaque Magistratuum commitantur. He was Elected into the Office, says Julius Pollux. Ʋbi infr. And Aristotle, in his Account of the Commonwealth of A­thens, affirms, that he was the Keeper of the Publick Records (and Tully says the same) enroll'd all the Decrees of the Senate, and was an Assessor in the Courts of Judicature. And therefore Suidas is mistaken, when he avers, that they had no other Employment, than to Write, Jul. Pol. l. 8. c. 8, 9, 11. and Read, or Publish the Or­ders of the Senate: There were Three [...] at Athens, of whom the [Page 219]First kept all the Publick Writings, the Letters and Decrees of the City, and he was chosen out of the [...] by the Council: To the Second, the keep­ing of all the Laws was entrusted, and he also was nominated by the Council: But the Third was the Secratary of the People, chosen by the Commons, and he it was who read all the Writings of the People, says the Scholiast of Thucy­dides, or rather read all the Publick Orders both to the Senate and People: His Method of Proceeding is thus stated by Ammonius, In [...]. [...]. The Grammateus having several Orders of Council in his Hand, which he was to publish to the People; he began with the first, and read the Name of the Person who proposed the Decree, his Father's Name, and the Name of the Tribe or People to which he belong'd, and then publisht the Decree it self; after which, [Page 220]he proceeded to the second, and third, till he had publisht them all.

The Name of the Secretary was al­ways inserted into every Decree, toge­ther with the [...], or President of of the Senate for the time being, or the Praetor. Thus the Inscription at Agri­gentum (Gergento) in Sicily, Grut. 401. [...]. And very often his Name had the precedence in the Decree, as appears by several Instances; Andocyd. de Myster. [...]. Thucyd. l. 3. v. V. Cl. Not. in Marm. Ox. 46. [...]. And in the Coins, the Name of the [...], as of a publick eminent Officer, from whose Year of Govern­ment the People made their Computa­tion, is frequently inserted, particularly in those of the Cities of Caria, where, I suppose, the [...] was the Chief Magistrate. One of the Coins of Mylasa is said to be stampt [...], (and Hybreas the Ora­tor govern'd the City, says Lib. 14. p. 659. Strabo.) So the Coin of the Magnesians, [Page 221]upon the Maeander, in the Reign of Maximinus, was stampt [...]. And another of the Ephe­stans, [...], when Ariston was their Secretary. And so Honou­rable was the Office, Act. 19. and so Great the Authority at Ephesus, that when the whole City was in an Uproar, and all the People of Asia fermented into a vio­lent Tumult, (for it is highly probable, that the Insult was made upon St. Paul, when the [...], the Commu­nity of Asia, were met to celebrate their Publick Games,) he, by his single Au­thority and Command, dismist and disperst the riotous Assembly.

And I conjecture, that it was one reason why the same Person was not long continued in this Office, to pre­vent any mischievous Innovations which might be made in the Republick by an Officer who nad so great a Trust, and had it in his Power to make himself very Popular. For it was a Law at Athens, V. Petit. de legib. Attic. That no Man should be twice [...], under the same Magistracy: Though [...] Person might be chosen a second time, under new Ma­gistrates, as appears by the Palmyrene [Page 222]Inscription; for though some Places of Trust were, by special Favour, and upon great Merit, given for Life, some of their High Priests being constituted [...] yet, though Sigonius affirms the contrary, even the High Priesthood it self was limited, and probably An­nual in many Places. So Grut. 448.1. Papirius Alexander is said to be High Priest the second time (though in the same In­scription he is called the Priest of Bac­chus for his Life.) And in a Coin of the Magnesians, near Sipylus, Apphianus is said to be Praetor and High Priest the second time. So several Cities were constituted [...], the second and third time. And T. Fl. Taeanus ( Gruter calls him Aelianus) is said to have been the thirteenth time, [...], in the [...]. And Cleogenes, in the Decree of the Senate and People of Athens, Petit. ubi sup. p. 232. is said to have been the first time Secretary ( [...],) as Malech Agrippa manag'd that Pro­vince a second time at Palmyra. Nor was the [...] always a Civil Of­ficer, or Minister of State, but some­times an Ecclesiastick, and Minister of Religion; for the High Priest had al­ways [Page 223]ways his Secretary; to which Office no Man was at first admitted, but he who was of the Patrician Dignity. Thus Cl. Paulinus, V. Gronov. Memor. Cosson. p. 146. Marm. 22. in a curious Inscrip­tion lately brought from the Levant, is styled the General of the Horse, the Prutanis, Aedilis, Quaestor, President of the Senate, President of the Gymna­sium (or Gymnasiarch,) Master of the Ordnance (or Armory,) the Custos Rotu­lorum, and Secretary of the Olympick Games. Where we may observe, that the [...] and [...] were distinct Offices, the one a Civil, the other a Sacred Employment: But that the first also was very Honourable; for in another Inscription brought from the same Place, T. Fl. Marm. Ox. 116. Onesimus Pater­nianus, is styled the Master of the Ordnance, the Guardian of the Temple of the Nemeses, the General of their Horse, the Keeper of their Records, the First [...] (or [...],) the Aedile, the Quaestor of the City, and honour'd with many other great Offices: as also, Grut. p. 219. that he was chosen by Vote; that he was to take into his Custody the Tables wherein the Laws were written; that he was obliged to preserve the Origi­nals [Page 224]of all the Leagues, and to keep in a strong Box all the Books belonging to his Office, and the Publick Affairs; and when he shall be required by the Community, he shall bring them into the Senate-House; and whenever the Society shall chuse another ( [...]) Custos Rotulorum, he shall de­liver up his Trust.

But in process of time, no Lay-man was permitted to be Secretary to the High Priest, he was always chosen out of the inferior Sacred Orders, and in the old Inseriptions is styled Scriba, à Libris Pontificalibus, who transcribed and preserved all the Ritual, and other Books, that belong'd to the High Priest's Office, and many times he managed the Revenues of the Sacerdotal College, being the Treasurer of the Temple. So Q. Ingenuus Maximianus was Scriba Pub­licus Pontif. Grut. 306.7. & Curator Aerarii, the Keeper of the Records of the Temple, (and Publick Treaties and Leagues, be­sides the Deeds of private Families, were for the most part deposited in Temples.) And the Treasurer; so Nehemiah made Shelemiah the Priest, and Zadock the Scribe, and the Levite Pedaiah, Trea­surers [Page 225]of the Temple ( Nehem. 13.13.) And Ingenuus is styled Scriba Publicus, because the High Priest had besides him (as I conjecture) another private Secre­tary for his own Affairs. So Livius Theona is said to be ab Epistolis Graecis, Id. 587.6. Scriba, à Libris Pontificalibus. Such Publick Scribes belonging to the High-Priests, were those probably of whom we read in the Sacred Writings, the Chief Priests and the Scribes being com­monly joined together, ( [...], Mat. 26.3. Mar. 10.33. a very honourable Station, for God is said to imprint Glory on the Face of the Scribe, Ecclus. 10.5.) and they conti­nued in Employment among the Jews, when the High-priesthood ceas'd, 600 Years after our Saviour's time; for when Gregentius introduces the emi­nent Jews, Disput. cum Herbano Judg. who attended their Cham­pion Herbanus to the Disputation about Religion, at Tephra, he reckons up a multitude of Scribes, and Pharisees, and Lawyers, who were present at the De­bate of the Controversie, they being the most illustrious Persons of the Nation; [...].

Among the chief Ministers at Antioch (a City with which Palmyra had a great Commerce) the Secretary of the Olym­pick Games was habited, Malel. l. 12. P. 377. and worshipt as a God; for when Commodus the Em­peror had confirm'd the Bequest of So­sibius to the People of Antioch, that every Fifth Year they might, for Forty five Days together, celebrate the Olym­pick Games, the next Officer to the Alytarches (who was the President of the Assembly, and made Laws for the good and decent Management of those Sports) was the [...], who represented Apollo; he was chosen by the Senate and People, clad, all the time the Solemnity lasted, in a White Gar­ment, his Head adorn'd with a Crown of pure Gold shap't like the Leaves of Lawrel, and was worshipt as if he had been Apollo. This Officer, if the Olym­pick Games were peculiar to Antioch in the East, as to Elis in Greece, (so says the learned Commentator on the Oxford Marbles, though the above-cited Inscription in Honour of Paulinus persuades me to believe that the Games were also celebrated at Smyrna,) was also peculiar to that City. But the rest [Page 227]of Asia had their other Games in Ho­nour of the Emperors (which were celebrated by the ( [...],) Communities of Asia, Galatia, Bithynia, &c. wherein the [...] had a principal share. This Office, perhaps, was discharged by Malech Agrippa at Palmyra, in the Games celebrated in Honour of Alex­ander the Emperor, when he came into that part of Syria, in the ( [...]) general Meeting of the Inhabitants of that Province.

At Alexandria, one Order of their Priests were called [...], (and among them, probably, he who was of more eminent Worth and Station was styled [...] Scribarum Pri­mus, as among the Lictors, the [...] was Lictorum Princeps,) of whose extraordinary Sobriety, Conti­nency, and other Vertues, together with their love of Solitude and Abstinences, Cheraemon the Stoick (who was of the same Order, say Theodorit and Tzetzes, Ap. Porph, [...]. l. 4. though Strabo speak slightly of him) gives a large Account. And St. Cle­mens of Alexandria describes their Habit; [...]. l. 6. [...]. [Page 228]That the Sacred Scribe had Wings on his Head (like a Mercury;) that he carry'd a Book in his Hand, and a Pot, or Vessel, (for so I render [...], not Regulam, as the Interpreter: For who carries Ink in a Rule? Ink must be carry'd in a Vial, or Pot. So Hesych. [...] ( lege [...]) [...], as I would correct the learned Grammarian. Id. [...] and so [...]) in which was Ink, and a Pen, to write with: His Provence was to be acquainted with, and to know exactly the Hieroglyphicks of the Egyptians, to understand Cosmo­graphy and Geography, the Motions of the Sun and Moon, with the Influences of the Seven Planets, the Chorography of Egypt, the Description of the River Nilus, the Use of the several Vessels and Instruments employed in Holy Offices, the state of all Consecrated Places, the several kinds of Measures, and what­ever else was necessary for the accom­plishing their Sacred Studies. For in [Page 229] Egypt the Priests were obliged to make themselves Masters of the Thirty six Books of Hermes, which contain'd their Sacred Philosophy, treating of Religion and Nature, (the other Six Books of his Works being Medicinal,) among whom the Prophet (the Chief Priest, or Prae­fect of the the Temple) was bound to learn Ten for his part (called [...], the Sacerdotal Books) wherein Hermes treated of the Laws, and the Gods, and the whole Discipline of the Priesthood; the Chanter ( [...], or [...],) the [...] (or [...], as Cheraemon calls them) with the [...], L. 1. Hiero­glyph. being obliged to learn the rest. And Orus Apollo says, that he who would describe an [...] in Hieroglyphick, ought to repre­sent him by Ink, a Sieve, and a Reed: Of the Reed the Egyptians made their Pens, so that Ink, and a Reed, denoted his Profession; the Sieve (which also was made of the Reed, or Bulrush) his Condition and Quality, that he was well provided for, and had leisure to study, those who want Bread being compell'd to apply themselves to Me­chanical Trades. And the same Au­thor [Page 230]informs us, they were Judges of Life and Death, not that they pro­nounced the Sentence of Condemnation upon Criminals, or granted Pardons or Reprieves; but that in times of Sickness, they determin'd whether the Patient should live or die: [...], (which is, I doubt not, an Egptian word, nor does it oc­cur in any Lexicon, only in Hesychius I find [...], and perhaps [...]) for the [...] had a Sacred Book, which they called Ambres (probably a Medicinal Treatise, one of the six Books of Hermes, which he wrote upon that Subject) by the In­spection of which, they judg'd whether the sick Person would either die, or recover. So much for the [...].

[...].

It is unquestionable, that the Hea­thens treated their Mock-Deities (and they did so in smitation of what the True God himself commanded the Jews [Page 231]under the Mosaical Constitutions) as great Princes use to be serv'd. The Temple was the Palace of the God, the Priests his Servants; he had every Day his Sacrifices, (and the Heathen Notion was, That the Deity liv'd upon the Steams and Blood of those Oblations, as the True God is said to smell a sweet­smelling savour.) The Temple was nobly furnisht with whatever might serve for Pomp or Use, with Tables (on which the Meat-Offerings and Drink-Offerings were presented,) with Pulvinaria and Lectisternia; with Beds, and Pillows of State, whereon he might rest himself, (for they believ'd him Per­sonally present in the Place that was consecrated to his Honour, as the True God dwelt in the Sanctum Sanctorum) and whatever other Utensils were re­quisite: And on the Days of High So­lemnity, the People were entertain'd at the Expence of the Idol (tho' them­selves pay'd for it, part of their own Sacrifices being deputed to that use) with Musick, and a splendid Feast, par­ticularly on the Anniversary Festival of the Dedication of the Temple; and a Master of the Feast was constituted to [Page 232]see all things managed with decorum, and in good Order. This Officer, pro­bably, is called, in the Sacred Writings, [...] in the Palmyrene In­scription, [...] the Symposiarch, in the Sacrifices of Jupiter Belus; which Office was discharg'd by Septimius Orodes. Varro calls the Symposiarch, Modimperator; Arrian, [...] Plutarch, sometimes, [...], at other times [...], or [...]. The Place (as well as the Entertain­ment) was called [...]. Hesyc. [...]. The Seats, or Couches, whereon the Guests were placed, [...]. So the old Glossary. Lectus Genialis, [...].) L. 6. c. 1. Jubius Pollux says the Sympo­siarch was the Curator, the Director and Governor of the Feast; (the [...], or [...], in Aristophanes,) and that he was chosen either by Lot, or by Vote; by Lot, says In Epict. l. 1. c. 25. Arrian. Plutarch, in a Treatise written on purpose on this Subject with great accuracy, as if he had been forming a Statue of Wax, how a Symposiarch ought to behave himself, says, Quaest, Conviv. l. 1. Probl. 4. That in his time the Practice [Page 233]was grown into disuse, (I suppose he means in Private Feasts; for in Solemn Festivals, I question not but it was pre­serv'd,) and that he and his Friends would endeavour to restore it; That the King (so he calls the Symposiarch) was crown'd, after he had been chosen by the common Consent of the Com­pany; That his Province was, to make and impose the Laws of Drinking; That he ought to be a Man of Skill in that Exercise, and a Man of Prudence, to consider that he govern'd his Friends, (That a Tyrannical Administration would mis-become such a Prince,) and so to order the distribution of the Wine according to every Man's capacity, that no one in the Company might prove troublesom in his Drink, and so to mix Water with every Glass, that every Man might be able to bear it: By which Method they did wind up every Man's Humour to such a peg, that the dissonant Tempers, as Discords in Musick make Harmony, might pro­mote the Mirth and Good Humour of the Company. He blames some Men, who turn'd the Room into a Court of Justice, a School, or a Play-house, intro­ducing [Page 234]Orators with their Declamations, Musick and Dancers, all which he dislikes. He distinguishes between Pri­vate and Publick Feasts; between what was Sacred, and what not; and cen­sures Alcibiades and Theodorus, that they managed the Private Feast of Po­lytion, as if it had been an Entertain­ment at a Solemn Sacrifice; for they had their Torch-bearers, and Eccle­siastical Officers who explained the Mysteries (Hierophantae,) whereas no­thing should be said or done in such a Meeting, but what is agreeable to the Design; That a strict decorum ought to be observ'd in such Meetings; That a Man with a hoarse Voice ought not to be commanded to sing, nor a lame Man to dance, nor an old Fellow to comb his Bald Head; That the Insti­tution was serious, tho' the Management pleasant and jocular; and that a Reward was given to him who should entertain the Company with any thing that was new and diverting, provided it were comely and honest. Thus Plutarch.

That all the Company obeyed the Master of the Feast, is plain from that passage in Arrian, Ʋbi sup. who says, That in [Page 235]the Saturnalia the King was chosen by Lot; That he commanded every one in Company, and order'd him his Busi­ness. [...] ( lege [...]) &c. Drink you, and do you fill, while the third Man sings; Go you home, you have your Dose, and come you in: — And every Man obeys, lest he should disturb the Mirth of the Com­pany. The Rule of Drinking was stated and known, every Man accord­ing to his capacity, the Symposiarch being Judge, and every wise Man as much as he pleased. So when the King of Persia made his Feast to his Subjects ( [...], the LXX. render it) they all drank according to Law, so say our Translators; but the LXX. [...], not according to the Rules which were usually prescribed by the Master of the Feast, every Man drank what himself pleased. And when Agesilaus the Great, Plut. A­pophth. Laconic. being chosen the Symposiarch, was askt by the Servant who fill'd the Wine, what quantity of Liquor he should give to every Man? If there be much Wine (says he) give every Man as much as he desires; if but a little, divide it equal. And I question [Page 236]not but these Rules of Drinking were observed in Solemn, Publick and Reli­gious Festivals, as well as in Private En­tertainments, since much of the Pagan Religion consisted in good Eating and Drinking, and other Methods of Jol­lity.

[...].

Nor were the Senate of Palmyra only concern'd for the immediate Rites of their own City, but they chose out of their Men of Condition, one or more to inspect the Places in their Neigh-bourhood, dedicated to their Religious Worship. So Bolanus the Son of Ze­nobius, the Nephew of Airanes, who was the Son of Mocimus, the Grandson of Matthas, was the Curator of the Fountain dedicated to Venus, at Nacle (or Naclis) a City that was situate be­tween Heliopolis (the Syrian Heliopolis) and Biblus, under Jaribolus, who being one of their ( [...]) Countrey Gods, was the President of the Place. Of Jaribolus I shall treat hereafter; at present, of the Overseer or Guardian of the Fountain. The Curators (that is [Page 237]the true Roman Name) were those who probably superintended the Repairs of the Fountain, collected and improved the Revenues, and made Provision for the great Crowds who came thither to consult the Oracle, or visited the Place, out of (mistaken) Devotion, at the solemn times appointed: They were the Aeditui Fontium, or the [...].

There were several sorts of [...] among the Antients, who had their Denomination from their Con­cerns: The Overseer of the Appian way ( [...]) occurs in Gruter, P. 495.2. (and the People of Spain were for a while very eager Disputants for the Honour of a new Saint, whose Tomb they had found, call'd St. Viar, through their mistake of a broken In­scription, of which only these Fragments remained, S. VIAR, i.e. Curatores Viarum.) So the [...] were the Overseers of their Games, says Julius Pollux. L. 3. c. 30. [...]. And Princes are said to be [...] [...]— Preservers of the Rights of Religion, and of their Subjects. The Curators of the Imperial Palaces and Revenues [Page 238]were Men of the Senatorian, and some­times of the Consular Dignity, Lib. 5. says Agathias: [...]. And the Wardens of the Port at Athens are styled [...] in Harpocration, who inspected the Ships, that bought Corn into the Port, and took care that the City might not want Bread. They were, says Lib. 6. p. 411. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, [...], Assistants to the Demarchus at Athens, Copartners with him in his Government, and Judges of Causes: But now, says he, from one part of their Business, they are called [...], the Guardians of Holy Places. The Trust was thought too great for any single Person. At Athens the number was Five, Aristot. [...]. Apud Har­pocrat. the President (or [...],) with Four Assessors, who were chosen by the People, two out of the Citizens in general, the third out of the Eumolpidae, the fourth out of [Page 239]the Ceryces (the Descendants from Eu­molpus and Ceryx.) In the Panathenaea & Dionysia their number was encreased to Ten, one out of every Tribe; but their Business was only the oversight of the Games (the Wrestlings, Pollux. l. 8. c. 9, V. c. 8. Horse­races, and Musick:) And when the greater Mysteries were celebrated, Ten inferior Priests ( [...]) were added to the [...] and [...], as Assi­stants in Sacrificing.

But though the Number at Athens, of their Curators of their Mysteries and Sacred Places, were but Four; at Nacle, its plain, they were more, from the In­scription, Eight at the least, and how many more we know not. At Ancyra in Galatia, the [...] was a Person of great Honour, from whose Office they commonly dated their Inscriptions, the Senate and People crecting a Monument to the Honour of Fulvius Rusticus Aemilianus their Bene­factor, V. Maym. I. in Memor. Cosson. p. 140. [...], when Menotesbius Alexander was their [...], (so I am enclined to render it, not that he only took care of the Inscription.) Marm. 3. p. 141. Another Inscription was set up to the Honour of T. Fl. Taeanus, [Page 238] [...] [Page 239] [...] [Page 240] [...] (when Agesilaus Secundus was Phylarchus, so they call'd the Commander of the Horse of every Tribe, who was a Lieutenant-General to the General of the Horse, says Har­pocration,) Flavius Asclepius and Au­relius Asclepius ( [...]) being Curators, for there were more than One at Ancyra; and sometimes the same Person was both the Phylarchus and [...]. Marm. 4. p. 142. Another Inscription to the Honour of the same Taeanus being erected ( [...]) when Posthumius and Antonius Antoninus were both [...] and [...]. But this I propose only as a Conjecture, and shall be glad to be corrected, if mistaken.

CHAP. IV. Of their Idolatry and Superstition.

I Shall not undertake to fix the Epocha of the Original of Idolatry, nor determine what Creature on this side the Highest Heaven, which is the Throne of the Great Creator of the World, was the first Object of Super­stitious Worship; but I have great reason to believe, that when Religious Adoration was first transferr'd from the True God, it was given to the Heavenly Bodies, to the Sun and Moon, they being the most illustrious Visible part of the Creation, and for ought that any Man, the oldest in the World, could remember or know (further than Revelation gave him infallible Instru­ction) might be, as they have conti­nued Unchangeable and Incorruptible in their Nature, so Eternal in their Du­ration, they having been made and fix'd in their glorious Spheres, before the first Man's Breath was breath'd into his Nostrils from Above: Whereas the [Page 242]older Heathens knew the Pedigree, and the times of the several Births of their Saturns and Jupiters, and the whole Race of Gods derived from them; their first Books of Heathen Divinity being written upon the Subject of the Theo­gony, or the Generation of their Gods.

But besides the Antiquity of their Original, their Usefulness and Benefi­cence to the World was another Encou­ragement to the Worship of the Sun and Moon; (and if we examine the late Pretensions of Polytheism, we shall find, that in a great part it proceeded from this Belief, That such and such Persons having been Benefactors to the World in many useful Inventions, they were for those Reasons, after their deaths, Deify'd and ador'd.) For what greater Blessings were the Heathens sensible of, than what the Sun, and, in a less degree, the Moon bestowed, who not only di­stinguisht the Seasons of the Year (the variety of which are necessary to the Productions of the Earth, and the growth of Animals) and regulated the Computations of Time, but gave to all Creatures Health and Vigour, and the Preservatives of Life; Light, the first [Page 243]Blessing the World ever saw, and the truest Emblem of the Divinity; and Heat, and genial Warmth, to cherish and Promote the Ease of Mankind, which also produc'd all things necessary for Life, form'd Minerals in the Bowels of the Earth, and regulated the Motions of the Sea.

And when some of the most ancient of the Eastern Sages, finding some Dis­cords in Nature, which they could not reconcile, agreed to assert two First Principles of Good and Evil, yet they chose the Sun to represent Both (as a common Agent in both their Names;) because when the Sun was in their Ho­rizon, they were Partakers of its Light, and its Heat; but when it retir'd, they were cover'd with Darkness (unless sup­plied by the Moon) because his Influences gave Life, and promoted the Genera­tion of Animals, but his Absence intro­duced Corruption and Death. And to preserve the remembrance, since the Sun was not always in view, the Orien­tals maintained an Unexstinguisht Fire to represent it (nothing here below comeing so near to the Image of that great Light, as Fire.) Nor did those [Page 244]Sages believe those glorious Planets to be meer Machines fix'd to their Orbs, but, as the Platonists talkt of Intelli­gences, who mov'd those great Bodies, so they thought them the Residences of the Divinity (the Sensible Sun to be the Seat of the Intellectual Sun.) And so the Manichees, who had their two first Principles from the Persian Magi, aver'd, that our Blessed Saviour dwelt in the Sun: And therefore they, con­trary to the Christians of those early Ages, who constantly and at all times ador'd toward the East, directed their Worship toward the Sun, in what part soever of the Heavens he was, believing that to be the Tabernacle fix'd for our Blessed Lord, in which he liv'd and mov'd. And among the Egyptians (between whom and the Persians, or Chaldeans, there was a Dispute for Se­niority in the Schools of ancient Learn­ing) they had a Tradition, That the first Books of Religious Worship were given to them by a Hawk, who brought them to the Priests of Egypt from the Sun, whose Bird the Hawk was, and by which they represented that noble Planet; as they did also Venus, says Horapollo.

And its unquestionable to me, that Baal, V. Seld de Diis Syris. Moloch, Milchom, Rimmon, Chemosh, Chiun, Nisroch, Nergal, and several other Dei­ties mention'd in the Sacred Writings; as also Saturn, Jupiter, Hercules, Osiris, Belus, Apollo, Mithras, Marnas, &c. were no other than the Sun: as Astarte, Ʋrania, Isis, Milytta, Alilath, Cybele, Juno, Lucina, Diana, and Venus, were no other than the Moon. The Phae­nicians call'd the Sun, [...] (says Philo Byblius) The only God of Heaven, who hears all Mens Prayers, and inspects all their Wants, says Or­pheus, (and from Orpheus the Pythago­reans, as from Pythagoras the Platonists, and other Greeks, receiv'd their Know­ledge of the Gods, says In Plat. Timaeum, p. 289. Proclus, out of Pythagoras himself; [...]). The King, says Julian (i. e. Moloch) the Governor of all Things. And the Moon is call'd the Queen of Heaven, in Holy Writ; and the Mother of the World, in Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Plutarch. For though the Heathen Deities were wor­shipt differently in different Countreys, [Page 246]and under different Names, they had all relation to the same thing, says Arte­midorus, [...]. l. 1. c. 9. p. 14. ( [...].) And this I shall briefly prove.

That the Sun is described under that variety of Names, is plain from the ancient Writers and Inscriptions: Sa­turn was the Sun, says Ad Auto­lic. l. 3. p. 282. Theophilus; (the Orientals worshipt Saturn, whom they call'd Bel, or Baal; and these Orientals were the Phaenicians and Syrians, says Damascius, in the Life of Isidorus, Apud Phot. Cod. [...]42. who call'd Saturn, El, Bel, and Bolathus; and no Man doubts but Bel was the Sun:) And so was Jupiter in the Esteem of the same Syrians, says Saturn. l. 1. c. 23. Macrobius; Assyrii quoque Solem sub nomine Jovis, quem [...] nominant, maximis ceremoniis celebrant in civitate, quae Heliopolis nuncupatur; (who, in the Palmyrene Inscriptions, is called [...], in others, [...].) And Herodotus says, the Persians called the whole Circle of the Heavens, i. e. the Course of the Sun, Jupiter. And from the Coins we learn, that the Antients had their [...], [Page 247] i. e. the Sun; as well as their [...], the Moon. Par. 1. p. 20. Ma­lela informs us, ‘That Mars was Baal; That the Assyrians erected a Pillar at first to Mars, whom in the days of Justinian they continued to worship, calling him, in the Persian Tongue, the God Baal, i. e. Mars the Warlike. (Though Jamblichus avers, that Azizus, i. e. Mars, among the Syrians, was but one of the Assessors, or Attendants of the Sun.) No Man doubts but that Apollo was the Sun; (and as it was customary to hang up Tables of extraordinary Cures, with the Method of Cure, in the Temple of Aesculapius at Coos; so was it usual, at Heliopolis, to do so in the Temple of the Sun: For C. 121. Nicolaus Myrepsus says, that the Medicine called Climax Her­maicus was transcribed from the Ori­ginal preserv'd in the Temple of the Sun at Heliopolis, written in the Cili­cian Characters.) And so was Adonis, says Satur. l. 1. c. 21. Macrobius, (Adonim Solem esse non dubitabitur, inspectâ religione As­syriorum, apud quos Veneris Architidis, & Adonis maxima olim veneratio viguit, quam nunc Phaenices tenent) worshipt [Page 248]both by the Syrians and Phaenicians. Now Adonis, among the Phaenicians, signifies a Lord, [...], says Hesychius; i. e. Adonai, among the Jews; among the Syrians, Moloch; but by the Egyptians, Tammuz. Mer­cury (the Syrian Mocimus, in Jambli­chus) was one of the Attendants of the Sun; and so was Hercules; as Mnevis and Apis were sacred to the Sun and Moon in Egypt, and Anubis was reckon'd of his Guard, In Plat. Polit. p. 417. ( [...], says Proclus;) as the Baetuli in Syria were reckoned his Assistants, says Damascius: And such, I suppose, were Jaribolus, and Malachbelus, and Alagbelus (or Elabe­lus, as it is written in the Inscriptions) at Palmyra: not the Summer and Winter Sun, as Mr. Selden; nor the Sun and Moon, as Mr. Halley; but Dii Patrii, or Penates, Assistants to the Sun. For the Sun was reputed the King of Heaven, surrounded with numerous Guards, and a Crowd of Attendants, (called, in Holy Writ, the Host of Heven,) the Signs of the Zodiack were reckon'd his Asses­sors; and the Planets, his Lictors, his [...], or Mace-bearers, says our [Page 249]very learned Selden, out of the An­tients; and 'tis considerable, that most of his Names among the Orientals, were rather expressive of his Dignity, than his Nature, as Baal, Moloch, Mithras, Marnas, Adonis, and the like, which are all Titles of Honour and Autho­rity.

And if Jupiter Thalassius were the Heathen Neptune, then Neptune was the Sun; [...], says Hesychius; He was wor­shipt at Sidon: And 'tis well known, that the Sun was the God of the Sido­nians. And Nonnus, in his Dionysiaca, Lib. 11. says [...], &c. That he was called Belus by the Syrians (the Inhabitants of Euphrates, at Palmyra, and thereabout,) Ammon in Lybia, Apis in Egypt, Saturn among the Arabs; but among the Assyrians, Ju­piter, Nor was Pluto a different Deity, says the Emperor Julian, whose excel­lent Oration in Praise of the Sun is well worth reading, [...].’

That Sarapis also was the Sun, is plain from what is already said, and [Page 250]from the old Inscription in XXII. 10, 11. Gruter, [...]. And Par. 2. p. 46. Malela says, that Theodosius caused to be shut up at Alexandria ( [...]) the Temple of Serapis the Sun. That the Persian Mi­thras was the same Deity, no Man doubts. Oeconom. c. 8. Xenophon, who had been in that Countrey, says that they swore by Mithras the Sun. And the ancient In­scription in XXXIII. 9. Gruter is dedicated [...]. And whereas Da­mascius says, that at Heliopolis, the Image of Gennaeus, in the Temple of Jupiter, was worshipt in the Figure of a Lion erect; what does it represent, but the Mithrae Leones, of which Ter­tullian treats? so was Bel. Serv. in Aen. 1. Linguâ Punica Bal dicitur apud Assyrios autem Bel — & Saturnus, & Sol. And Zosimus says, L. 1. p. 56. that when Aurelian had built a noble Temple at Rome to the Honour of the Sun, he placed in it [...], read it [...]) the Images of the Sun, who was Belus, which he had brought with him from Palmyra: This Bel was the same with the Deus Belenus of the Germans, and the Abellio [Page 251]of the ancient Gauls, and accordingly they offer'd Humane Sacrifices to him: Hominem optimam, & gratissimam Diis victimam, says L. 3. c. 2. Mela of the old Gauls. Thus was Moloch worshipt a­mong the Jews, Edomites, and others, who sacrificed their Children to the Idol. The same Oblation did the Africans make to Saturn; and Elaga­balus the Emperor, to his Country God Alagbaal his Namesake, says In Pseud. Anton. l. 5. Herodian.

That Osiris, Omphis, and Nilus, were different Names of the same glo­rious Luminary, our learned Mr. Selden hath undeniably proved. And so was Orus, says Horapollo, L. 1. Hie­rogl. ( [...].) In short, Julian says, that all the several Names of the Heathen Gods were expressive in a different manner of the Glory of the Sun; [...]. Nor did the Arabs, in the time of Alex­ander the Great, worship any other Gods but the Heaven, i. e. the Sun and Bac­chus, says L. 7. de Expedit. Alex. Arrian, [or rather Bacchus and Ʋrania, as Herodotus, and Celsus in Origen, affirm, i. e. the Sun, and the [Page 252] Moon; for Bacchus was no other than Auson. Epigr. 29. Osiris, and Adonis,] the Island of Nosala, and some other whole Countries, being dedicated to his Service. In Palestine they devoted Horses and Chariots to his Honour, to denote the Swiftness of his Motion, 1 King. 23. and they worshipt him toward the East, the Rising-Sun, Ezek. 8. turning their Backs upon the Sanctum Sanctorum, which was toward the West. His Festival was celebrated with great Pomp, says Julian; his Birth-Day was celerated on the 25th. of De­cember, says the old Calendar, and his Day of the Week, at Antioch, was dedicated, in their highest Solemnities, to the noblest Exercises, the Horse-races, says Malela. And when the Heathens swore with the greatest gravity, Marm. Oxon. 1. they call'd him to wit­ness the Truth of what they said; [...] (not [...], as it is pub­lish'd,) I swear by Jupiter, the Earth, the Sun, and the other Gods. And this I men­tion, that I may take leave to mention another such Correction in Edit. Ox. p. 7. Aristeas; [...], &c. (not [...]:) for if so, it should be [...], &c.

The Moon was reputed the Sister and Wife of the Sun, as Juno was of Jupiter; and the same with Venus, says Philo­chorus, in Macrobius. Now, Venus was a very comprehensive Name among the Antients, says Tetrabib. l. 1. Ptolemy, The Syrians worship Venus, as the Mother of the Gods, ( [...],) calling her by several Names in several Countries. And Plu­tarch affirms, In Crass. that the Goddess of Hie­rapolis was by some called Venus; by others, Juno; by a third sort, Nature, that gave Beginning and Seeds to all Things: By the Assyrians, Arabs, and Persians, she was ador'd under the Name of Ʋrania, says Lib. 3. Herodotus: And in Africa, says Apologet. Tertullian. And Lib. 6. Met. Apu­leius calls her Dea Caelestis magna Jovis germana, & conjux. And so says Plo­tinus, ( Ʋrania was Venus and Juno, the Wife and Sister of Jupiter.) And she is called by Lib. 5. Herodotus, [...], the Governess of the Stars, i. e. the Queen of Heaven. (And for this rea­son the Egyptians accounted it absurd to call Heaven, [...], by a word of the Masculine Gender; they styling it Ʋrania, because the Moon governs all [Page 254]Things.) And therefore Elagabalus the Emperor being himself called by the Name of the Sun, called his Wife Ʋrania, as if they had been the Sun and Moon. de Deâ Syr. Lucian says, that the Sy­rians at Byblos (the next Town to Hierapolis, for this reason, in the Coins, called [...], the Sacred Byblus) wor­shipt Venus and Adonis with great Solemnity, and that the Phaenician Astarte was the Moon, ( [...], says Procopius, in 2 King. 17.) she being ador'd in Syria under that Name, in the days of [...]. l. 1. c. 9. p. 14. Artemidorus, i.e. under the Antonines, ( [...].) And the above­mention'd Lucian says, that the Juno at Hierapolis (the Goddess of Syria) was of all Shapes, but still the same God­dess; she was in some Features like Minerva; in others, like Venus, the Moon, Rhea, Diana, Nemesis, and the Destinies. Ʋbi sup. Macrobius says, that the Syrians worshipt Adonis ( i. e. the Sun,) and Venus Architis ( i. e. the Moon.) Some Criticks read the word Adar­gidis, others, Dercitidis; but Mr. Sel­den, Aphaciditis. And it must be ac­knowledg'd, [Page 255]that Venus was solemnly worshipt at Aphaca, a Place not far from Hierapolis; and so probably was she at Arca, a City in Syria, not far from Aphaca, and near both Hierapolis and Byblus, the Place where Alexander Se­verus was born, says P. 114, 118. Lampridius (who in one place calls it Ʋrbs Arcena; in another, Arca Caesarea) one of the In-land Ptol. l. 5. c. 15. Cities of Phaenicia. So that I think the words in Macrobius need not correction: for as from Aphaca is de­rived Aphacitis; so from Arca, Arcitis. Venus being the known Deity of all that Country, De C. D. l. 4. c. 10. St. Austin wonders why the Heathens should account Vesta and Venus the same, while the one was the Goddess of Chastity, the other the Patroness of Lewdness: But his Admi­ration would have ceas'd, had he con­sider'd, that the same Mock-Divinity was represented under those different Names. That Isis, Lucina, Diana, Hecate, &c. were the Moon, is prov'd by Mr. Selden: And though Athens were Minerva's own City (and she the Patroness of Modesty,) yet Theseus their Founder commanded the Citizens to worship [...], says Attic. p. 20. Pau­sanias, [Page 256]the same, I suppose, with Pallas. The Pythagoreans sacrificed to Venus ( i. e. the Moon) on the Sixth Day of their Week, i. e. Friday, says Vit. Py­thag. l. 1. c. 28. Jam­blichus; a Day sacred also among the Arabs (being dedicated to their Ʋrania) long before Mahometanism prevail'd a­mong them. And lest the Moon should be treated with an inferior Worship, and appear without Attendants, the Antients offer'd Immortal Fire to Her, as well as to the Sun, says Julian, and gave her a Paredrus, or Companion; [...], in Hesychius; the [...] Sors Lunae, says Mr. Selden; Satur. l. 1. c. 19. but Macrobius says, that [...] is the Moon herself.

And it is to be observ'd, that the Antients allow'd not of Sexes among their Gods; or rather, thought every God of both: Hence Orpheus calls the Moon, [...]. And so is Bacchus styled, [...].’

And Calvus the old Poet, in Macrobius, ‘Pollentémque Deum Venerem.’

And the Deus Lunus was famous in the [Page 257]East, worshipt at Carrae in Mesopotamia (on whose Coins a Cock is stampt, be­because he was [...], says Vit. Pyth. l. 1. c. 18. & l. 2. c. 21. Jamblichus in the esteem of the Pythagoreans, [...], sacred to the Sun and Moon,) at Ancyra in Galatia, at Antioch in Pisidia, at Nisa in Caria, at Gaba in Galilee, at Juliopolis in Bithynia, at Magnesia in Asia, at Saettae in Lydia, and at Sibi­duda in Phrygia Salutaris, as the Coins in F. Harduin expresly declare.

It is highly probable, that the Wor­ship of the Sun was the Religion of the Chaldeans, in Abraham's time, when God rescued that learned and devout Patriarch from the Prejudices of his Education, and the Persecutions of his Adversaries; (and if the Sacred Rites of the Chaldeans had their Original in Egypt, and were thence transplanted into the East, the Idolatry begun much earlier:) But this we are sure of, that the first Account that is given us of Idolatry, in the oldest Book in the World, the oldest, at least, that is come to the hands of the Men of the later Ages (the Book of Job, which, I may presume, was penn'd before the History [Page 258]of the Creation it self) is that of the Worship of the Sun and Moon, of Job 31.26, 27. worshipping the Sun in his splendour, and the Moon walking in her brightness, long before any of the Heathen Saturns or Jupiters could enter their claim, they all having been born long after Job's time. And the Form of Adora­tion there mention'd is very ancient (Kissing the Hand, and paying Obeysance,) which is naturally render'd by [...] and Adoratio, among the Greeks and Latins. And when the Jews turn'd Idolaters, they are said, Judg. 10. to worship Baalim and Ashteroth, that is, in the Punick Language, says St. Au­gustine, the Jupiters and Juno's of the Heathen World; by which he cannot mean other than the Sun and Moon: For Jupiter and Juno, in the Age just after Joshua, were not then in Embryo; and when the Gentiles of succeeding Ages, the latter School of the Plate­nists (who were great Admirers of the Orphick and Pythagorean Rites) asham'd of the Accounts which the old Poets gave of their Gods, turn'd all the Story of Homer and Hesiod into Mythology; they still continued the Worship of those [Page 259]glorious Planets. With what Pomp and Ceremony of Eloquence doth Julian the Apostate Emperor treat of this Sub­ject, in his Hymn written in Praise of the Sun, styling him, the King of all the World, the Most Divine Prince, and the Common Father of Mankind, ( Au­relian calls him a Deity that he was sure of, Deus certus Sol.) and, that all things, from one end of the World to the other, were govern'd by his Providence; affirming, that for his own part, he had from a Youth a great regard for him; and that at Constantinople they kept an Annual Feast, and offer'd Sa­crifices to his Honour. Nor does he forget the Moon, who was solemnly worshipt at Athens after his time: For N. 11, Marinus, in the Life of Proclus, in­forms us, that when Lachares and Sy­rianus, upon the first appearance of the Moon, did adore the Goddess ( [...],) that Proclus retiring a little way from them, put off his Shoes (another Custom and Rite of Religious Worship, as old at least as Moses, when he convers'd with God in the Bush, continued by the Platonists, in compliance with the Rule of Py­thagoras, [Page 260] [...], that he who would sacrifice, ought to discalceate,) and then saluted, i. e. ador'd the Deity, ( [...].) L. 4. p. 245. And when Zosimus the Pagan Historian studiously aggra­vates the Severity of the Edict of Theo­dosius, who destroy'd all the Heathen Temples and Images, he subjoins, that it was very dangerous for any Man, at that time, to assert the Rights of Pa­ganism, to affirm that the Heathen Deities were Gods, or so much as to look up to Heaven, and to worship the Sun and the Moon ( [...].) And at this day, among those poor Savages who inhabit the remotest part of Earth, in Greenland, and other Parts of the North, if they have any Religious Ceremonies, any Object of Worship, they bow down to the Rising-Sun, and acknowledge its Di­vinity: As in like manner the old Scythians, L. 3. c. 5. with whom one continued Night, as in Greenland, lasted half the Year, worshipt Apollo, says Mela. Nor could the Christians easily be wean'd from this Custom at Rome, a long time after Christianity had prevailed there; for many of them, in the days of [Page 261]Pope Leo the Great, Ser. 7. de Nativitat. Christi. when they came into the Church of St. Peter, as they went up the Steps that led to the Altar, turning themselves about, bow'd their Heads, and worshipt the Rising-Sun.

This Worship was objected to the Jews, in the days of the first Roman Em­perors, by Petronius and Juvenal, that they worshipt nothing but the Clouds, and the Sun, (for so I render Caeli Numen,) i. e. in the Sacred Style, the Host of Heaven. And in the Reign of Honorius and Theodosius, the Caelicolae were a new upstart Sect of Superstitious Votaries ( Nomen inauditum quodam­modo novum crimen superstitionis vindi­cantes, Cod. l. 1. tit. 9. §. 12. in the words of the Law) called Caelicolae, says the Collector of the Sy­nopsis [...], because they worshipt the Heavens ( [...]) who had their separate Places of Meet­ing, their different Rites, and distinct Ministers of their Religious Ceremo­nies: But whether they were Jews, the remains of the old Essens, as some affirm, (though the Law seems to me plainly to distinguish the Caelicolae from the Jews,) or some Christian Hereticks, the Progenitors of the Euchitae (as others [Page 262]affirm, though the Law also seems to distinguish them, when it makes them liable to the same Penalties with Here­ticks,) or rather some of the Remains of the old Heathens, who renounc'd their Saturns and Jupiters (whose Di­vinities they could not vindicate; be­cause whatever is God, must be Eternal) but stuck to the Worship of the Sun and Moon, as the later Platonists did, be­cause they believed them Eternal, and of the same Duration with the Supreme Being, I will not undertake to de­termine.

Considering what hath been already asserted, I think it needs not much more Proof, that Syria was eminently famous for the Worship of the Sun and Moon. In Syria, 'tis most probable, that this Idolatry either had its first Original, or its most immediate Propagation; and there it continued till Paganism breath'd its last in that part of the East, till the Followers of Mahomet, profest Ene­mies of Polytheism, made use of the Sword to extirpate it. The whole Country seem'd to be devoted to this Service; Edessa is called the Re­gion dedicated to the Sun, from the [Page 263]Beginnings of Time ( [...]) and sow as Hierapolis-Byblis said to be consecrated to Venus and Adonis, and so was all Phaenicia. Aeschylus, in his Supplices, styles Phae­nicia, [...], i. e. saith the Scholiast, because all the Coast about Mount Libanus was parti­cularly addicted to the Worship of that Deity: The Worship begun in Assyria (or Syria;) from them the Men of Ascalon brought it into Phaenicia, and from them the Cypriotes deriv'd their Superstition.) Ammian, Marcel. l. 23. c. 23. And in the Emperor Julian's time, the Moon (the same with Venus, as I have already prov'd) was most solemnly worshipt at Carrae, and in all the adjacent Country; and their most illustrious Princes thought it not a diminution of their Honour to be Priests to their Gods; Herodian. l. 5. Bassianus and Alexianus (i. e. Elagabalus, and Alexander Severus his Brother) were both consecrated Priests of the Sun, tho' both reputed the Sons of Caracalla the Emperor, and their Mother was un­doubtedly the Empress Julia's Sister, and themselves Candidates of the Empire, (and, as of old, the Eldest of the Family [Page 264]was both Prince and Priest; so Herodian affirms that Bassianus was consecrated to that Service, because the Office pe­culiarly belong'd to the Eldest Brother:) Ithobalus, or Ethbaal the King of Tyre, was the Priest of Astarte, Ad Autolic. p. 257. says Theo­philus: And when Pompey, having sub­dued Mithradates, distributed King­doms among the great Men of Asia, who had given him Assistance, he made Archelaus the Priest of Venus, in Com­magene; which entitled him to a Prin­cipality and Authority not inferior to the Royal Dignity, says Bell. Mi­thrad. p. 251. Appian. And what extraordinary Influence Sampsai­geramus the Priest of the same Idol at Emesa had upon that Country, hath been already demonstrated.

How much addicted Palmyra was to Venus, who appointed Curators of her Fountain at Nacle, out of her most emi­nent Inhabitants, and what a glorious Temple was erected in that City to the Sun, so adorn'd and beautify'd, that Aurelian thought the Spoiles worthy his carrying to Rome, has been formerly mention'd; and though that victorious Prince, in the heat of Action, could not prohibit his Soldiers the plundering and [Page 265]defacing that noble Structure, he soon after took care, though the rest of the City was left buried in its own Ruines, that the Temple should be re-edified; Vopisc. p. 219. for Aurelian had a particular Veneration for the Sun (whose Figure appears often on his Coins,) Id. p. 213, 217. his Mother had been the Priestess of Apollo, in the place where he was born; and when his Affairs at Emesa (in his Engagement with Ze­nobia) were desperate, 'tis pretended that his Foot were encouraged to sup­port his routed Horse, by an extraor­dinary Person whom he knew not at that time; but when he return'd to Emesa, and went into the Temple of Elagabalus to give Thanks for his Victory, he there met the same Figure which had appear'd to him; where­upon he founded a Temple in that City to the Sun, (a new Temple, without doubt; Herod. ubi sup. for the Temple of the Sun was famous at Emesa before Aurelian's time, for its Beauty and Magnificence, its extraordinary Riches, and the Quality of the Votaries who sent their Offerings thither, the neighbouring Barbarous Princes every Year making their Pre­sents to Elagabalus,) and another at [Page 266] Rome, Zosim. l. 1. p. 56. upon which he bestow'd a vast Summ of Money, adorn'd it with the the Spoyles of the famous Temple at Palmyra, having at the same time of­fer'd his own unparallell'd Robe to the Deity.

In Syria, and the neighbouring Pro­vinces, lived the Philosophers who kept up the Reputation of Paganism, when it was expos'd to the severest Prosecution of the Imperial Edicts: Porphyry was of Tyre; Sopater a Syrian; Jamblicus a Native of Chalcis; Ʋranius was of Apamia; Eustathius and Aede­sius, Cappadocians; Proclus of Lycia; Marinus a Samaritan of the City of Sichem; Damascius of Damascus; Sim­plicius a Cilician; Hermias and Dio­genes, Phaenicians; Isidorus of Gaza, &c. And whatever progress Christianity might have made in other Places, it is plain, from the Epistle of Julian to Li­banius, that Heathenism defended its Possession in Syria; for when that un­happy Apostate Emperor made his Ex­pedition into Persia, from Berrhaea to Batnae, all the Countrey was full of Sacrifices; the smell of Incense had per­sum'd the Air; and at Hierapolis he [Page 267]met with more than a few who had been Confessors, in the former Reigns, for the Ancient Rites. In Malela's time, the Assyrians continued to worship Mars, or Baal; and whoever shall read Da­mascius's Life of Isidorus, may satisfie himself what Methods the Philosophers of those days used to support the Inte­rest of Polytheism, what Visions they pretended to, what Magical Rites they used, and what Miracles were wrought in Confirmation of their Opinions; Zosimus affirming, that in his time a Globe of Fire hover'd up and down in the Air, about the Temple of Venus, at Aphaca, the Place whither the Men of Palmyra sent to learn their Fate, when Aurelian threaten'd them with Ruine, says that bigotted Advocate of Idolatry, who thus relates the Story; That when they having consulted the Oracle at Seleucia, in Cilicia, had received from thence a melancholy Answer, they sent to Aphaca, a Place situate between Heliopolis and Byblus, where the Temple of Venus Aphacitis stood: Near that Temple was a natural Fountain, that seem'd as if it had been made by Art; to this Fountain the People of that [Page 268]Country, at those Set-Times, when they met there, brought their Offer­ings, either of Gold or Silver, Silks, or Linnen Cloaths, or whatever else was of Value: If Venus was pleased with the Oblation, the Garments that were offer'd sunk to the bottom, as well as the heavy Metals; but if the Deity was displeas'd, all swom on the top of the Fountain; and that this Omen befel the Men of Palmyra, the Year when their City was destroyed. But the Oracular Fountain, that fore­told the Ruine of Palmyra, could not secure it self from a like fate in a few Years after, under Constantine the Great, which Eusebius, the Church Historian, thus relates; Euseb. Vit. Constant. l. 3. c. 55. & Orat. de laud. Con­stant. That the pious Emperor having been inform'd, that the pretext of Religion, was only a cover for noto­rious Debaucheries, resolved to destroy all those Places that were destin'd to the Gratifications of the Flesh, particularly the famous Temple of Venus in Phae­nicia: That on one part of the Mount Libanus, near the top of it, in Aphaca, a Grove and Temple had been conse­crated to Venus, not in the middle of a City, or in the High-way, where the [Page 269]Ambition of the Heathens prompted them, for the most part, to build their Temples, but in a retired Place, remote from all Towns, and publick Roads, where a School of Lewdness was e­rected, where effeminate Men prosti­tuted themselves to unnatural Lusts, in honour of the Daemon; and the Female Sex, laying aside all regard to Modesty and Religion, devoted themselves to gratifie the irregular Desires of all Pre­tenders, they living without Control or Observation; because no vertuous Person durst approach the Place; till that illustrious Prince commanded his Soldiers to demolish the Temple, and so put a period to those abominable Pra­ctices, giving the Pagan Inhabitants truer Notions of Religion and Chastity: This, says Eusebius, was the Fate of that infamous Temple. But see the Malice and Disingenuity of a zealous Heathen: Zosimus affirms, that a miraculous Fire hover'd over the Place in his time. And Damascius tells strange Stories of the same nature, Vit. Isidor. in his days, of the Globes of Flame (the Baetuli) that frequently appear'd about Mount Li­banus: That the Worship at Aphaca was [Page 270]in use before Marcus Antoninus's Reign, the Palmyrene Inscription demonstrates: Zosim. ubi sup. The Solemn Meetings there were An­nual, the Practices most execrable, Lust and Luxury making a great Figure in all their pretended Religious Ceremonies, especially in that Country, Lucian him­self avering, that at Byblus, De Syr. p. 658. & ult. a very little way from Nacle, the Women who re­fused to cut their Hair in the time of their solemn Mourning for the Death of Adonis, were obliged for a whole Day to prostitute themselves to all Strangers; and whatever they got, was to be spent in a Sacrifice to Venus.

Aphaca was the Name of the Place, says Zosimus ( [...]) and Eusebius seems to be of the same Opi­nion (there being many Cities of that Denomination in Syria, Euseb. de loc. Hebr. one belonging to the Tribe of Juda, another to the Tribe of Asher, a third in the Coasts of the Amorites, a fourth a City of Syria;) but others, with greater pro­bability, that the Name of the City was Nacle, (and of the Well Aphaca;) so says Suidas expresly, V. [...] & v. [...]. upon the Autho­rity of Christodorus, who wrote the History of Nacle, or Naclis, (a Book [Page 271]which, if extant, would have much il­lustrated this part of our History) that it stood near Heliopolis, and that the Rites called [...] (not [...], as it is in the printed Copy) were there per­formed. What is meant by [...], the Lexicographer informs, Etymol. M. V. [...]. that it is a Syriack word, (in the Arabick it signi­fies Praeputium, or Vinculum,) and that if it be fit to render such a word into Greek, it signifies (a) Embraces, Venus in that place embracing her Darling Adonis; and probably Nacle has a like signification.

CHAP. V. An Accounu of Vaballathus.

HAving, in the foregoing History, averr'd, that Vaballathus was not the Son of Odenathus, as the generality of Writers have attested; but the Grand­son of that heroick Prince, as Monsieur Tristan and F. Harduin have affirm'd; I think my self obliged to give my Rea­sons for my Opinion; the Roman and Greek Historians of those times being either wholly ignorant of him, as, I think, Trebellius Pollio, Zosimus, and others were; or mistaken in his Pe­digree, as Vopiscus, who is the only Author who mentions him, seems to be.

That Odenathus had Grandsons before he assum'd the Purple, Trans. p. 88. appears to me very plain from the Palmyrene Inscrip­tion, where Septimius Odenathus (the same, I believe, with the Emperor of that Name) at that time a Man of the illustrious Senatorian Order and Dig­nity, [Page 273]built a Monument for himself, his Sons, and Nephews, or Grandsons, ( [...].) That those Nephews could not be the Off­spring of Herennianus and Timolaus, the Sons of Zenobia, is to me undoubted; because at their Father's Death they were very young, says the Roman Historian, (Zenobia, Trebel. Pol. p. 180. quòd parvuli essent filii ejus, qui supererant, Heren­nianus & Timolaus, ipsa suscepit impe­rium,) and therefore may be supposed the Sons of Herodes, or Herodianus, whom Odenathus begat on a former Wife; and for these Reasons, and by the help of the Inscriptions, I am en­clined to deduce the Line of that Fa­mily after the following manner: [Page 274]

  • NASORUS
    • VABALLATHUS.
      • AIRANES.
        • SEPTIMIUS ODENATHUS.
          • N. his first Wife
            • ATHENAEƲS HERODES.
            • SEPTIMIƲS AIRANES.
              • HERMIAS VABALLATHƲS.
          • SEPTIMIA ZENOBIA his second Wife
            • HERENNIA [...]
            • TIMOLAƲS.
            • Daughters mar­ried at Rome to Persons of the Senatorian Dignity.
              • Their Children at Rome, A. C. 400.

I have been encouraged to believe that Odenathus in the Inscriptions was the same Person with the Emperor of that Name, from his prae-Nomen Sep­timius, which cannot justly be pre­sumed to have been used in the East, before the First Emperor of that Name made his Inroads into Persia. Now Septimius Severus died, Anno Christi 211, before which time Odenathus may well presumed to have been born, being murthered Ann. Chr. 26⅞ and I have given him a second Son, from the Authority of the Inscriptions, where Septimius Airanes, Pag. 99. a Man of the Con­sular Dignity, is said to have been the Son of Odenathus, the Date of the In­Inscription confirming it, viz. A.C. 253. I have also adventured upon adjusting the Pedigree of his Ancestors, from the same Inscription, Pag. 88. where Septimius is said to be the Son of Airanes, the Grandson of Vaballathus, the Great-Grandson of Nasorus (according to the Method of the Arabs, who usually reckon'd their Descent after that man­ner;) for I cannot think Airanes to be the prae-Nomen of Vaballathus, since all their fore-Names were either Roman [Page 276]or Greek, to neither of which Lan­guages Airanes belongs. I have also subscribed to the Opinion of Tristan and Harduin, that Vaballathus was the Son of Herodes; not only because Herodes is in the Coins represented with a Beard, which implies some Years beyond Youth, while Vaballathus has a very young Face, but because the Coins de­clare him to have continued Emperor, after Zenobia was conquer'd; and I am so far from thinking that his Mother-in-Law held the Empire in his Name, that I believe she prosecuted him, as she did his Father, that she might en­throne her own Children; the Subject, it must be confest, is much in the dark, and for want of Directions from the Antients, it is easie to be mistaken, but the luckiest Conjecturer in such Cases is the best Critick. It is plain from the Historians, V. Tristan. Tom. 3. p. 2 [...]8, &c. that there were violent Contests between Herod and Zenobia, while Odenathus was alive (as it sel­dom happens that Mothers-in-Law look over-favourably on their Predecessor's Children) but that those Disputes serv'd only to advance the Son in his Father's Favour, who had declar'd him his Co­partner [Page 277](a little while after himself had been made Emperor) and consequently his Successor; and accordingly the Coins mention the third Year of his Reign, whereas Odenathus wore the Purple but four Years, being then murthered, and with him his Son Herod. Upon whose Death, I doubt not, but Vaballathus immediately assum'd the Imperial Title and Dignity, as in right he ought, and probably was confirm'd in his Pretensions by Claudius and Au­relian, (otherwise his Name and Titles could never have appear'd on the reverse of the Coins of Aurelian; for neither Zenobia's nor either of her Son's Name is found on any of the Imperial Coins of the Romans, because in open Hostility with them; which confirms me, that Vaballathus was not the Son of that great Queen,) his Fourth Year being coincident with the First, his Fifth with the Second of Aurelian, (which unque­stionably proves him to have been De­clared Augustus, as soon as his Father was dead;) but being convinced that Zenobia had made the Army firm to her Interests, and declar'd her own Sons Emperors, he fled to the Romans for [Page 278]Protection, who being well assured of the Justice of his Title (his Grandfather Odenathus having been declar'd Em­peror at Rome, whose right Heir V [...]bal­lathus was, whereas Zenobia had no such Pretensions) treated him with that Respect which those great Princes used to pay to distressed Monarchs; and I doubt not, but in Gratitude to his Patrons, he assisted Aurelian, not only with the Equity of his Cause, but with what Forces he could bring into the Field. In the Sixth Year of his Reign, he had the Satisfaction to see his Competitors conquer'd, and led Captive to Rome; Goltz. The­saur. p. 73. and the Coins tell us, that he bore the Title of Emperor in the Fourth Year of Aurelian, which was the Seventh of Vaballathus, (ΑΥΤ. Κ. ΟΥΑΒΑΛΛΑΘΟϹϹΕΒ Λ.Ζ) which was the Year after Palmyra was ruin'd. From whence it plainly ap­pears to me, that he was a Confederate of the Romans in that War, his Effigies and Titles being stampt on the reverse of Aurelian's Coïns, that very Year that he undertook his Expedition into the East, as well as the Year after Ze­nobia was subdued; for that was a Pri­vilege [Page 279]never granted but to those Princes who were in League with, and had done good Service to the Roman Com­monwealth. So Rhemetalces King of Thrace is joyn'd with Augustus, and Ab­garus the Toparch of Edessa with Mar­cus Aurelius, to demonstrate their being in the Interests of those Princes, but with some distinction in the Habit of the Head, or Crown, to denote their Subjection; for when Vaballathus wears a Wreath or Diadem, then Au­relian wears a Crown of Lawrel; but when Vaballathus wears a Crown of Lawrel, Aurelian wears a Crown radiated, or, as the Heralds call it, rayoneé.

How long Vaballathus lived after the Eighth Year of his Reign, or what his Fate was, I know not; but I am enclined to believe that he sunk by de­grees in the Favour of Aurelian, and being deprived of the Imperial Dignity, was forced to content himself with the meaner Title of King, or Viceroy, and that this happen'd in the two last Years of that Emperor; for to that Year I refer those Coins, wherein he is styled [Page 280] VABALATHƲS REX. V. Fulv. Ʋrsin. Not. ad Vopisc. Aurel. Mezzob. p. 407. Patin. Jud. f. 29. — VABAL. LATHƲS REX ƲCRIM. P. P. — ƲCRIMOR—ƲCRIMP —ƲCRIMDR. —VERIMP. — VABALATƲS ITER. IMP. R. — all which are Latin, and consequently seem to be coin'd, not in the East, but somewhere nearer Rome, but all in the Reign of Aurelian; and from them I conjecture that Au­relian, after he had setled his Autho­rity in Syria, destroy'd Palmyra, and put an end to the Pretensions of the Family of Odenathus, oblig'd Vabal­lathus to decline the Title of Emperor, and to use that of the Imperial Vice­gerent in the East; and that this is implyed in the Coins, where he is said to be ƲCRIMOR (wrongly in others ƲCRIMDR, or ƲCRIMP) not Vice Cae­saris Rector Imperii Orientalis, as F. Har­duin very ingeniously (because in Au­relian's Age, and long before, Caesar was a Title of Honour inferior to that of Imperator, Spart. p. 35. Capitolin. p. 24. Aelius Verus being the first who was declar'd Caesar, but never was Emperor, the Title at that time, and in future Ages, being appropriated to the Heir Apparent of the Empire; [Page 281]so that it should have been Vice Impe­ratoris, as Nemesius is styled in Clxviii. 4. Gruter,) but Vir Clarissimus Rector Imperii Orien­talis; for so the Governors of Pro­vinces were styled, Grut. CL. 9. in the Language of the Law, and in the old Inscriptions, Fabius Maximus V. C. Rect. Prov. &c. This Province Vaballathus managed more than once, being said to be ITER. IMP. R. i. e. iterum Imperii Rector, a second time the Emperor's Vicegerent in the East; for such were the Toparchs of that Country (the Name demonstrates it, Toparcha is Vicem­gerens,) which was in some Ages fill'd with those Roytelets: Such also were Phylarchs of the Arabians, who held their Dignity at the pleasure of either the Romans or Persians, to whom they were subject. (Thus Agrippa, upon his Father's Death, was made Prince of Chalcis, but when he had continued in that Government four Years, Joseph. An­tiq. l. 20. c. 3, 5. was displaced by Claudius, but made Te­trarch of Iturea, Batanaea, Trachonitis, and Abilene, to which the same Empe­ror afterwards added a part of Galilee.) But though their Territory was small, their Ambition commonly was very [Page 282]great, and the Titles which they af­fected very pompous, witness a Coin of Antiochus the Fourth, V. Har­duin. Num. p. 587. one of the little Princes of Sebaste, a corner of Cilicia erected into a Kingdom by Vespasian, says Ant. l. 18. c. 7. Josephus, who styles himself [...], the great King; and another of Abgarus on the reverse of Severus, with the same Title; it being very likely that Vaballathus, prompted by the like Vanity, styled him­self Vaballathus Rex Ʋcrim. P. P. Va­ballathus the King, and the Father of his Country, (as in a Latin Coin of Zenobia, whom Theodorit, who was of Cyrrhestica, a Province not far from Palmyrene, calls the Toparch of Pal­myra; she is said to be Queen or Go­verness of all the East; Zenobia Aug. totius Orientis R. i. e. Rectrix, or Re­gina, as she styles her self in her Letter to Aurelian;) unless this Inscription intimates to us another change in his Fortune and Tenure, that he was con­stituted the Prince of that part of Cyr­rhestica, whose chief City was Ʋrima (in the Coins, by mistake, Ʋcrima, and Verima) situate on the Euphrates, between Samosata and Edessa, near [Page 283]the Mid-way, and an Episcopal See.

Against this Opinion, that Vaballathus was the Grandson of Odenathus, the learn­ed Spanheim musters all his Forces, Dissert. 7. de Ʋsu & Pr Numism. p. 597, &c. and blames Monsieur Tristan for indulging too much to his own Wit and Con­jectures, while Vopiscus says expresly that Vaballathus was Zenobia's Son, ( If. Casaubon's Notion, that it was only a fictitious Name, through mistake of the Greeks, who understood not the Syrian Language, needs no further Con­futation;) for which Opinion also Sal­masius contends earnestly, the Credit of Vopiscus supporting it. But it is plain, Not. in Vo­pisc. p. 380. that Vopiscus was deceived in that Pa­ragraph, when he says, ‘That Zenobia did not hold the Empire in the Name of Herennianus and Timolaus, but of her Son Vaballathus. — expresly against the Assertion of Trebellius Pollio, 30 Tyr. p. 198. who affirms the contrary; and of P. 216. Vo­piscus himself, in another place, ‘That Zenobia held the Empire of the East (Nomine Filiorum) in the Name of her Sons.’ — And that the Coins are an unquestionable Confirmation of this Truth, Spanheim himself confesses, in which the second and third Years of [Page 284]their Empire is recorded; and there­fore (if any Manuscript would give countenance to the addition) I should think, with Tristan, that the word (Herodis) is left out, and that it should be read Vaballathi Herodis Filii; or probably Vopiscus might mistake his Author, (for P. 209. he confesses, that he took all his Notices out of the Greek Writers,) and through haste, read [...] for [...], and so translate Filii for Ne­potis. But the placing the Head of Va­ballathus on the reverse of Aurelian's Coins, is to me an unquestionable Evi­dence that he was not Zenobia's Son; for I believe there cannot be one In­stance produced of any Emperor who gave such an Allowance, but to a Friend and Confederate; whereas Ze­nobia and her Sons were always in profest Enmity, and open War with the Romans, and the Romans with them, who were very eager, all through the Reign of Claudius, to have that haughty Queen subdued, and the Empire wrested out of her Hands. Nor will the Years of his Reign agree with this Opinion (if Vaballathus were carry'd a Prisoner to Rome with Zenobia, and Zenobia did [Page 285]not reign above five or six Years;) for those in Goltzius mention the Seventh Year of his Reign; one of which was stampt at Troas, implying, that that City declar'd for his Interests, in the fifth Year of his Empire, the Year in which Aurelian went to the East; and the Figure of Hope on the reverse of one of his Latin Coins, Mauroceni thes. c. 13. p. 143. implies his Ex­pectation to be restored by that puis­sant Prince, who had been so long kept out of his Right by his Mother-in-Law.

But Spanheim enforces his Opinion with a second Argument, That Herod's Name doth not appear in any of the Coins of Vaballathus, nor is there any Proof that Herod was ever call'd A­thenas, or Athenaeus. To which I an­swer in general, That it was the Custom of that Age and Country to have Two Names, the one Latin or Greek, the other Syriack, as Septimius Odenathus, Hermias Vaballathus; so that it is not improbable, that Herod was call'd A­thenaeus, ( Athenas, Athenaeus, Atheno­dorus, from Athene, i. e. Minerva, as Hermias from Hermes, or Mercury.) I once thought, that [...], by the [Page 286]transposing the Letters (done by the Greek Monetarii, ignorant of Syriack) was put for [...], (by which Name Malela, the Syrian Writer, always calls Odenathus;) but from one of the Coins in Goltzius, Thesaur. p. 73. [...] — I am enclinable to read it, [...], He­rodes and Orodes being the same Name, and always so written in the Inscrip­tions. But of this Conjecture I must leave those Persons to be Judges, who have seen those rare Coins, while I profess I was never so happy.

CHAP. VI. An Account of Longinus.

HAving accounted, as well as I could, for Vaballathus, I shall easily be pardoned by all the Lovers of Learning, if out of a due Reverence to the Memory of Longinus, I endeavour to adjust the Particulars of the Life of that admirable Man.

Who his Father was, we know not, it having been the fate of many other excellent Persons, that the World hath been left ignorant of their Parents, or the Place of their Nativity; but his Mother's Name was Frontonis, Suid. [...] the Sister of the famous Fronto (Nephew pro­bably to the great Plutarch) by Birth of the City of Emesa, by Profession an Orator, who having, in the Reign of the Emperor Severus, fix'd his Residence at Athens, became a Competitor for Glory in his publick Exercises with Philostratus the Elder, and Apsines of Gadara, and died at Athens, leaving his Nephew Longinus the Critick his [Page 288]Heir. Whether Longinus was born at Palmyra, as the Editor of his Book of the Sublime Conjectures, I know not; though it be not altogether improbable that his Mother, who was of Emesa, might marry at Palmyra, a City not far from it; though Tanaquil Faber, in his Edition of that excellent Trea­tise, from that Passage of Vopiscus in the Life of Aurelian, Pag. 219. ‘(That Longinus dictated the haughty Epistle of Ze­nobia to the Emperor Aurelian, tho' it were written in Syriack—)’ would conclude, that Longinus was not born in Syria; and that those who determin that that Country was the Place of his Nativity, are confuted by Vopiscus.

He is usually called Dionysius Lon­ginus, but for what reason, or from what Manuscripts, I know not; Suidas expresly calling him Cassius, though I rather think it should be Casimus, as it is in the old Milan Edition of that Lexi­cographer, when he reckons up the Au­thors out of whom he compiled his Work ( [...]) Casimus, Abul Casimus, and Al-Casem, being Arabick Names, that commonly occur in the Saracenick History.

In his younger days he travell'd into many Countries to improve his Studies, Ep. Longini apud Porph. Vit. Plot. (his Parents giving themselves the Satif­faction to travel with him, and to ob­serve his Proficiency,) where he con­tracted an Acquaintance with the most learned Men of all Nations, who were the Ornaments of that Age, with Euclides, Democritus, and Proclinus of Troas, the Platonists; with Plotinus, and Gentilianus Amelius, of the same Sect at Rome; with Ammonius and Origen, under whose Tuition he was a long time (probably at Alexandria, where also he acquir'd the Acquaintance of Heliodorus the Peripatetick;) with Theodotus and Eubulus, who kept up the Platonick Succession at Athens; with Themistocles and Phebion, the Stoicks; with Annius and Medius, with Herminus and Lysimachus, with Athe­naeus and Musonius, of the same School at Athens; as also with Ptolemy, and another Ammonius, the Peripateticks.

Having thus gratify'd his Curiosity in his Travels, and furnisht his Mind with they useful Learning of the Age, he fix'd at Athens, probably under the Tuition of his Uncle Fronto, who enga­ged [Page 290]him in the Study of Philology, where he soon discover'd his excellent Genius, and was reputed the most famous Cri­tick of his time, his Judgment of Au­thors being so much valued, that it be­came the Standard of that learned Age; and every Book was either approv'd or condemn'd, as Longinus pronounc'd its fate. At Athens, I conjecture, he wrote his admirable accurate Treatise of the Sublime, upon the Importunity of his Friend Posthumius Terentianus (or, as some other Copies read it, Sect. 10. Florentianus) to whom he dedicates it; for, speaking of the most celebrated Orator, he calls him, our Demosthenes, and reckons him­self among the Greeks. At Athens, Porphyry became his Scholar, Eunap. Vit. Porphyrii. a Privi­lege much valued in that Age; for Lon­ginus was reputed a living Library, his Province engaging him to consider and censure the Writings of the Antients. And there Longinus changed his Syrian Name Malchus into that of Porphyrius (as Amelius, upon the same dislike, call'd him Basileus) training him up in the Niceties of Gramma [...] and Rheto­rick, and accomplishing his Juvenile Studies; and Porphyry, who himself was [Page 291]an excellent Critick, calls him in grati­tude ( [...]) the Prince of the Criticks, and the best Philologer of his Age: For if any Man had adventured to correct an ancient Writer, his Opinion never found Approbation, till it was confirm'd by the judicious Longinus. Nor was his whole time spent in Criticism; tho' Plotinus, toucht with a little Envy, for they did not agree in all their Senti­ments, said he was a good Philologer, but not a Philosopher; for he profest himself a Platonist, and, as such, cele­brated the Festival of Plato (probably his Birth-day) at Athens, Porphyr. a­pud Euseb. Prepar. l. 10. Porph. Vit. Plotini. according to the Custom of those Times, with great Solemnity, and gave himself up to that Allegorical way of Writing to which that Sect of Philosophers indulged; for from him, and Numenius, as well as from the Books of Plato, Origen learn'd his method of Allegorizing the Holy Porphyr. apud Euseb. H. E. l. 6, c. 19. Scriptures. How long he fill'd the Platonick Chair at Athens, or who suc­ceeded him, I know not; as also, whe­ther he ever lived at Magnesia ad Si­pylum, or not, and were the Praetor of that City, Successor, perhaps, to his [Page 292]Uncle Fronto in that Office; since I find in the Coins of Valerian, V. Hard. Nummi. [...]. h. e. [...] (another Aurelius Fronto was Praetor of Byzantium, under Alexander Severus;) and in another of Gallienus, [...]. Nor can I fix the Year when he retired into Syria, and setled himself at Palmyra, where his Learning and Wisdom rendred him very illustrious, and capacitated him to assist Zenobia with his Counsels, till his death, and to educate her Sons in all good Literature. But though he gave himself to the Study and Practice of the Rules of Government, while he lived at Palmyra, as became a Privy-Counsellor to a great Queen, V. Gesn. Biblioth. and there probably writ his Book of Tacticks, for the use of that warlike Empress; yet he was far from deserting his other be­loved Muses, but made diligent En­quiries after the Writings of all the learned Men of that Age, Porph. ubi sup. especially of Plotinus. The Country where he was, lay remote from the known Seats of polite Learning; the People, in an active and contentious Age, were more addicted to Arms than Arts: And the [Page 293]Language of Palmyrene was so very dif­ferent from the usual learned Tongues, that he look'd about him a long time, till he could find a Copyist that under­stood so much Greek, as to enable him to translate the Works of Plotinus; but having found a fit Man, he confin'd him to that Province, as himself relates in his Epistle to Porphyry: Such a Value did he put on the Works of that pro­found Platonist, tho' he did not agree entirely with him, and took an occa­sion to write against him and Amelius, expressing at the same time a deep Ve­neration for them both. He encou­raged Amelius to visit the East, and of him purchased all Plotinus's Works: And having heard that Porphyry, by his Abstinence, and other Severities, had impair'd his Constitution, he in­vited him also very earnestly to come to Palmyra, assuring him that that Air would repair his ruin'd Health, and kept up his Correspondence with his old Friends to the day of his death: And there also he wrote his Panegyrick upon Odenathus (probably upon the Death of that heroick Emperor) which Libanius was so fond of; but whether [Page 294]he composed any of those Books at Pal­myra, either in Critick (for he censured both Poets and Orators) or Philosophy, the loss of which the learned World be­wails, is uncertain: This we know, that that haughty Epistle which Ze­nobia sent to Aurelian, when he re­quired her to resign her Authority, was said to be dictated by this great Man, the Resentment of which gave occasion to his death; for that severe and proud Emperor hated any thing that seemed to check his Power, or ruffle his am­bitious Thoughts.

So fell the admirable Longinus, to the grief of all good Men, who bemoan his fate, and the loss of his excellent Writings, most of which, in all likely­hood, perisht when Palmyra was de­stroy'd. I had some Intentions to have subjoyn'd an Account of his Works, but I supersede that Disquisition, as foreign to my present Design, till some other Occasion offers.

CHAP. VII. A short Commentary on the Inscriptions.

I Have digested the Inscriptions, not as they are set down in the Journal, where they are placed as they inciden­tally fell under the Traveller's Eye, but under their several Heads, to which they seem reduceable. And first I be­gin with the Sepulchral Inscriptions, the Epitaphs inscribed upon the Tombs of the People of Palmyra.

I.

[...].

Which may be thus rendred:

Monumentum sepulchrale propriis sump­tibus condidit Septimius Odenathus emi­nentissimus Senator, Aeranis filius, Va­ballathi [Page 296]nepos, Nasori pronepos, & sibi, & filces suis, & nepotibus in perpetuum, in honorem sempiternum.

This Inscription contains an Account, ‘That Septimius Odenathus, the most excellent Senator, had erected that Monument for himself and his Poste­rity, to preserve their Name for ever.’ And he hath hitherto had his Wish, the Monument having escap'd the Fury of Time, the Rage of the Roman Soldiers, and the Madness of the superstitious Arabs, who are profest Enemies to all the remains of venerable Antiquity. That this Septimius Odenathus was the same illustrious Person who afterward was declar'd Emperor, I suppose, P. 27⅔. I have already prov'd to be very probable.

[...] occurs not in the Lexicon, but signifies a Place of Burial. The Place is the Sepulchre, the Epigraphe the Monument, says In 3 Ae­neid. Servius; Operis extructio sepulchrum, nomen inscriptum monimentum; but a Mausolaeum con­tain'd many Sepulchres, as one Se­pulchre might include many Monu­ments; the Tomb being built very often (as our Vaults) for the service of [Page 297]the whole Family, as this of Odenathus was erected for himself, his Sons and Nephews; others, for the Owner, his Children and Servants, &c. whereas whosoever laid violent Hands on him­self, was to be buried alone, Plato, l. 9. de Legib. and with­out an Inscription: The shorter the Epitaph, the more honourable it was accounted, so it contained the Atchieve­ments of the Person there deposited, it was not to exceed four Heroical Verses, says Plato, ( [...]) and of this kind ( i. e. very short) are the Palmyrene Inscriptions. Pausan. l. 2. But the Men of Sicyon chose a much shorter Method, inscribing only the Name of the Dead Person (not men­tioning so much as his Father's Name) and wishing him Joy; while the Pal­myrenians inserted their Pedigree to four or five Generations past. By such Monuments the Antients thought to perpetuate their Memory to Eternity, and for this reason the Grave is com­monly called Domus Aeterna, V. Gruter. passim. Domus Perpetua, Domus Aeternalis, and Se­pulchri Perpetui Honor; and what is in this Inscription said to be done [...], is in another [Page 298]Monument said to be, [...]. And with their own Names they inserted those of their Progenitors, that they also might be enrolled in the Annals of Honour. And they often took care to inscribe the Epitaph in se­veral Languages, that other Nations might be thereby instructed in the Name and Vertues of the Dead, (and perhaps, that they might preserve some remains of their native Language likely to be supplanted and forgotten.) Capitol. Gordian. 3. p. 165. Thus, when Philip had slain the Emperor Gordian, the Army buried him at Circeia Castra (or Circesium) in the Confines of Persia, and wrote his Epi­taph in Greek and Latin, in the Persic, Jewish, and Egyptian Languages, that all Nations might understand it, To the Deify'd Gordianus, the Conqueror of the Persians, the Goths and Sarmatians, the Arbiter of the Roman Seditions, the Conqueror of the Germans; but not the Conqueror of the Philippi, for they murder'd him.

2.

The Second Inscription contains an Epitaph which Soraechus erected to his [Page 299]Wife Martha, Ann. Christi 178. in the 1 8/9 of Marcus Antoninus the Em­peror:

I. [...].
[...].

And may thus be rendred:

In memoriam Marthae Alexandri Ca­padeti filiae, Vaballathi Neptis, Symonis proneptis Soraechus Aeranis filius, mari­tus illius posuit mense Martio, A. D. 490.

3.

The Third is of the same nature, appropriated by Malchus to himself and his Children, tho's built by his Ancestors:

To [...].
Hoc Monumentum condiderunt Elabe­lus, Mannaeus, Sochaeis. Malchus verò Vaballathi filius, Mannei nepos, Elabeli [Page 300]pronepos sibi, & filiis posuit, anno 414. mense Aprili.

It is plain, that in this Inscription there is a mistake in the first line, of [...] for [...], and a greater in Grammar, if Elabelus, Man­naeus, and Sochaeis, be taken for the same Man; I have therefore render'd it literally from the Greek, and have reason to think that there is another mistake in the Name [...], for if Malchus were the Grandson of Man­naeus, the Great Grandson of Elebelus, as the Inscription demonstrates, then Sochaeis and Vaballathus must be the same Person, for he is expresly called the Son of Vaballathus; nor is it unpardonable to imagine, that In­scriptions set up by Syrians, who can­not be presum'd exact Masters of Greek, and transcribed in some haste, might be subject to mistakes, many such (whe­ther of the Graver or Copyist, I can­not determine) frequently occurring to the diligent Reader; and there­fore I believe that [...] should be chang'd into [...], or [...] ϹΟΧΑΕΙϹ / ΒΟΛΛΛΘΟϹ) the same Name with [Page 301] Vaballathus, by which Alteration the whole Inscription is very intelligible Sence, and Grammar.

4.

[...]
I. [...].
[...].

Thus rendred:

Monumentum in sempiternum honorem aedificavit Gichus Mocimi filius, Caelcial­cisi nepos, Mannaei pronepos in sui, & natorum, & posterorum sepulturam, anno 314, mense Aprili, i. e. Chr. 2 o.

I very much doubt, that more than one fault occurs in the Names of the Persons, (and perhaps for [...], we may read [...] al is a common prefix; and Asisus, or Azisus, a Syrian Name. Josephus mentions Azizus a Roytelet of Emesa; it was also the Name of their God Mercury;) and if so, it must be render'd, Mocimi, qui & Azizus, filius, Mannaei nepos. But I dare not vouch for the Emenda­tion; [Page 302]whatever therefore may become of that Conjecture, it is certain, that there is a mistake in the Date, and that for ΔΙΤ we ought to read ΔΙΥ. (Υ and Τ are letters easily confounded,) because in the Inscription, Ϲ for Σ, and ω for Ω, and Ε for Ε are used, all which never appear in any genuine Coin, or Marble, till Domitian's time, as the Criticks agree.) This Inscription therefore is of the same Year with the precedent, the Monument being set up, Ann. Chr. 102, the Fourth of the Em­peror Trajan: And these two are the most ancient Inscriptions at Tadmur. I have rendred [...] by honos sempiternus, upon the Authority of Hesychius, [...].

5.

From the Inscriptions of the Se­pulchres, I proceed to consider their publick Monuments, erected by the Order of the Senate and People of the Commonweal [...]h of Tadmur, to the Ho­nour of such of their Citizens who had deserv'd well of the Republick. The [Page 303]first that occurs, relates to Alilamenes, or rather Alcamenes.

[...].
Senatus, Populusque (Palmyrenus) Al­camenem Panii Mocimi, qui & Aeranes, filium, Matthae nepotem, & Aeranem illius patrem viros pios, & patriae amantissimos, & omnimodo publicè pla­centes patriae, & penatibus honoris ergô, anno 450, ultimo mensis Aprilis, h. e. Ann. Chr. 131. Hadriani Imp. emor­tuali.

Alcamenes is a Name well known, and frequently occurs; but Alilamenes, no where, that I remember. Thucyd. l. 8. Alcamenes was one of the Generals of Agis King of Sparta, sent into Eubaea when that Island revolted from the Athenians, afterward made the Governor of Chios, and slain by the Athenians at Pireaeus. [Page 304]Another Ttetz. Arel. 8. p. 147. of that Name, was a famous Statuary in Brass, a Contemporary and Rival of the great Master Phidias; or perhaps it should be read, Alexamenes. Alexamenes the Son of Damon was the Polemarchus, or General of the Aeto­lians, says CXXIX. 15. Gruter; and instead of Panius, I would read either Pinnius, which is no unusual Name among the Romans ( L. Pinnius Celer, & L. Pin­nius Celsus occur in the Inscriptions) or rather Phanius; [...], in DV. Gruter; [...], the Praetor of Apamia, in the Harduin. p. 58. Coins. That this Phanius Mocimus was also called Airanes, the Inscription demonstrates, wherein Airanes is expresly called the Father of Alcamenes; they are both magnified for their Piety, and their Love to their Country (as Barachias, and Mocimus his Son, are applauded in the next In­Inscription) to which they were great Benefactors, while in gratitude their fellow-Citizens honoured such Patrons with the magnificent Titles of [...] ( Founders of their City,) [...] ( Saviours,) and [...] (Benefactors,) paying them the highest Respect while alive; and perpetuating their Memory [Page 305]when dead, by a thankful Remem­brance, by publick Statues, and noble Inscriptions, according to that excel­lent Sentence that is happily preserv'd among the Fragments of the ancient Gratitude in one of Gruter's Marbles, 896, 4. [...].’ That good Men, even when they are dead, ought to be recompenc'd, and celebrated.—Thus the Senate and People of Ancyra, the Metropolis of the Tectosagi, ho­noured L. Fulvius Rusticus Aemilianus, Calpurnius Proclus, and T. V. Marm. Cosson. 1, 2, 3, 4. Flavius Taeanus, their Benefactors, their Foun­ders, and Saviours. This Title of Be­nefactors was sometimes given to Kings, says the Holy Writ, Luk. 22.25. to the Ptolemy's, Mithridates, to Philip of Macedon, and other Princes; even to Women, so Berenice is called by Era­tosthenes: sometimes by Sovereigns to their Subjects, so Artaxerxes honour'd Mordecai with the Title of Benefactor and Saviour, says Antiq. l. 11. c. 6. Josephus. Their Names and Atchievements, for the Preservation of their Masters, being re­corded (V. Esth. 6. 1, 2.) and a par­ticular Reward always V. He­redot. l. 8. appointed [Page 306]them; at other times to whole Coun­tries, so the Agriaspae were called Arrian. l. 3. de Ex­ped. Alex. p. 73. [...], (the Persian Name is Orosan­gae, says Herodotus,) because they amsted Cyrus the Son of Cambyses in his Expedi­tion against the Scythians; a Title that demonstrated their Likeness to the Dei­ties, [for the Egyptians called their Nilus and Osiris, i. e. the Sun, Omphis, which signifies a Benefactor, says De Isid. & Osir. & Julian. O­rat. 3. Her­maeus in Plutarch,] to whom also a good Man was sometimes accounted a Bene­factor, for so Clinodemus the Son of Le­botus is by a publick Decree of the Senate and People of Delos declared ( [...]) he and his Posterity Benefactors to the Temple and People of Delos. V. Oxon Marm. Ap­n. 1. & 3. p. 287. And Dionysius of Berytus is celebrated as a Benefactor to his Country Gods, so the learned Edi­tor of the Oxford Marbles, and others, understand the Inscription, [...], i. e. Beneficus erga Pa­trios Deos, while the Inscripton may be thus rendred, I think more properly, Dionysius Zenonis filius Theodori nepos Berytius beneficus (h. e. solenni decreto Berytiornm [...], seu Benefactor [Page 307]sancitus) Diis Patriis (Marmor sc. seu aram posuit, seu dedicavit.) Thus in a curious Inscription found and tran­scribed by Monsieur Spon, in the Isthmus of Corinth; the Dedication is made, [...], Miscellan. erudit. An­tiquit. §. 10. n. 111. p. 363. Publius Licinius Pyaem. Priscus Iuventianus, the High Priest for Life, devoting to his Country Gods, and his Country, the Altars which he had built, the Pro­visions which he had made for the Athletae, who should come thither to the Isthmian Games, with other munifi­cent Buildings erected to their Honour:’ Upon which account we may well pre­sume him a Favorite to the People of Corinth, and to the Penates; as Alca­menes and his Father Airanes are said to be pleasing not only to their fellow-Citizens, but to their Country Gods, who probably by an Oracle declar'd their good Opinion of their Persons, and acceptance of their Services; for so Julius Aurelius Zenobius is in ano­ther of these Inscriptions, P. 97. Transact. said to be for his extraordinary meritorious Ser­vices to his Prince and Country, ho­nour'd with a Testimonial from the God Jaribolus, (who was doubtless one [Page 308]the Country Gods, or Penates of Pal­myra;) and Bolanus declar'd in a third place to be chosen one of the Curators of the Fountain Aphaca by the same God Jaribolus, P. 103. the Heathens paying a great Veneration to their Country Gods, or Penates, (for so the old Gles­saries instruct us. Penates, [...]; Goth. l. 1. c. 25. p. 375. & vice versâ [...], Pe­nates: and Procopius says, that Janus was the first of the antient Gods, whom the Romans call'd Penates, [...], h. e. Penates, Ep. Jam­blich. [...].) For when Julian the Emperor would pass an extravagant Complement upon his Friend Jambli­chus, (if the Epistle be his, which I much doubt) he says, that as soon as he came into Bithynia, he offered him his Presents, as if he had been one of his Country Gods, [...].

6.

[...]......
Senatus, populus (que) Bareichen (seu Barachiam) Amrisamsi filium Jaribo­leos nepotem & Mocimum illius filium viros pios, & Patriae amantes honoris ergo coluit.

This honorary Inscription needs no Commentary, since it is so very like the former, unless it be worth re­marking that Jariboleus is here the Name of a Man, as elsewhere of a God, it being very usual to give the names of their Deities to their great Men; though perhaps it might not be rec­kon'd the wildest of Conjectures to imagine, that Amrisamsus was called Jariboleus after the name of his God, to whose Patronage he had committed himself, and by whom he was nomina­ted to some Office, perhaps the Priest­hood, as Bolanus was by the same Deity to the Office of Curator of the Foun­tain Aphaca.

The following Inscription is very noble, and very instructive.

7.

[...] [Page 310] [...].
S. P. Q. (Palmyrenus) Julium Aure­lium Zenobium, qui & Zabdilas, Dios­malchi filium, Nassumi Nep. militantem in adventu Dei Alexandri, & indefessà praesentiá, inservientem Rutillio Crispino Duci, & deductis vexillationibus; aedi­lem, nec suis parcentem sumptibus, sed & optimum Magistratum, ideó (que) testimonio ornatum à Deo Jaribolo, & à Julio ...... nobilissimo Praefecto praetorio, & à Patriâ, Patriae amantem, honoris ergo. Anno. 554. Christi sc. 242. Gordiani tertii ⅚.

To understand this Inscription a­right, it is requisite to reflect upon the State of both the Roman and Persian Empires at that time, which I shall [Page 311]briefly consider. Alexander the Great having made himself Master of all the East, Zosim. l. 1. pag. 18. his Successors the Kings of Syria, kept the Possession of that part of the Empire, till Arsaces the Parthian, pro­vok't by the Injuries done to his Bro­ther Tiridates, took Arms, and having slain Pherecles the Governor of the Country, laid the Foundation of the Parthian Empire (which whither it commenc'd under Seleucus Callinicus, or his Father Antiochus, who call'd himself the God, I will not undertake to determine:) This Empire lasted 270 Years, L. 2. & He­rodian. l. 6. says Agathias out of the Records of that Country, from Arsa­ces their first King to Artaban the last, under whom Artaxeres, ( Zosimus calls more properly Artaxerxes) an obscure Persian, but of an aspiring Mind, of great Courage and Industry, having fermented several of the Natives into a Rebellion, after three Battles fought with success, seiz'd Artaban, and, hav­ing muther'd him, put the Crown on his own Head, and so translated the Empire a second time to the Persians. This happen'd, Agath. l. 4. says the above-menti­oned Historian, in the five hundredth [Page 312]and thirty eight Year of Alexander the Great, ( i. e. of the aera Seleucidarum) and in the fourth Year of Alexander the Son of Mammaea: Artaxerxes hav­ing thus conquer'd the Parthians, and settled himself in the Throne, the next Year after, viz. the fifth of Alexander, he made his Incursions into the Roman Territories. Alexander at first attemp­ted to divert him from his Inroads by his Letters; but finding the Method unsuccessful, he marcht with a power­ful Army into the East, fought that potent Prince, forc't him to fly, and got a glorious Victory, having taken 300 Elephants, Lamprid. pag. 133. destroy'd 200 more, slain an Hundred and twenty thousand of their Horse, besides 10000 of their (Cataphractae) Troops, that were arm'd cap à pe; he also recover'd Mesopota­mia out of their hands, and first taught the Persians how to serve the Romans; after which he return'd to Antioch, and from thence to Rome, where the Senate decreed him a Triumph, as the Reward of his Services on the 25th of September, Anno Christi 22 6/7.

This Victory, says Cassiodore in his Fasti, was obtain'd in the first Year of Alexander, Julianus and Crispinus be­ing Consuls, (his Coss. Alexander Xerxem Regem Persarum vicit) but he is mistaken; for not to mention, that Julian and Crispinus were not Consuls, till the ⅔ Year of Alexander (who came to the Empire Anno aer. vulg. 222. the 10th of March, after Heliogabalus was slain) being fixt by all the other Fasti, (both those of Idatius, and those, which the most Learned Mr. Dodwell hath publisht out of the MSS. of Sir H. Savil, and Isaac Vossius) to the Year of Christ 224. Agathias positively avers, that Artaxerxes did not assume the Crown of Persia, till the fourth Year of Alexander Mammaeae, which is exactly coincident with the 538th year of the aera Seleucidarum, and the vulgar Year of Christ 22 6/7 and this account the Historian declares he had from the Archives of the Persian Kings.

In this Expedition the Palmyrenians declar'd for the Interests of the Ro­mans, against the Persian Usurper, and sent their Troops to their assistance un­der [Page 314]their General Zenobius. This Ze­nobius is said to be the Son [...], or [...]. like [...], the Names of the Heathen Gods being usu­ally given to the Men of illustrious Des­cent; this Diosmalchus was the Son of Nassumus: Transact. pag. 98. In another Inscription a like name occurs, [...]. The Expedition of Alexander is stiled [...], that great Prince having been dead some years, when this Inscription was erected, and by the Senate deified, who appointed him a Colledge of Priests, call'd Alexandriani, and order'd a Festival to be kept on his Birch-day, Lamprid. pag. 136. which the Romans continu­ed to celebrate near a hundred years after, in the days of Constantine the Great; and to this Deification probably the [...] in the Inscription, hath a remote relation; for the Heathens sel­dom speak of their Princes, but as of sacred Persons, their Persons were nu­mina, and all their Laws and Actions divine. Thus [...] is often used; when Eunapius treats of the Title of Philostratus's Book of the Life of Apol­lonius, he saith, it rather ought to be stiled [...], the Pa­gans [Page 315]setting up that Impostor in oppo­sition to our blessed Saviour, who being God, made his appearance among Men. So St. Gregory of Nazianzum, Orat. 38. calls our blessed Lord's Incarnation [...]. It was the com­mon Opinion of those Ages, that their Gods did upon some solemn days de­scend from Heaven, put on humane Shape, and appear in those Cities, for which they had a particular Regard, (as many of the Ancients thought the Martyrs did frequently show them­selves in those places, either where they had been born, or put to death, Vid. Dion. Chrysost. Tars. 1. pag. 408. or bu­ried;) and this Descent they called [...]; and being prone to Deify their Princes, and to treat them with all sort of divine Honours, when­ever the Emperor vouchsaft to visit any City, they entertained him with the highest Testimonies of Joy and Exulta­tion, and reputed the Day a solemn Festival; and therefore in the Coins [...]. V. Harduin. num. p. 397. And Adventus Augusti faelicissimus frequently occurs, and in another of the Inscriptions at Palmyra, [...].

The Imperial General in this Expedi­tion was Rutillius Crispinus, (the Praeno­men of that great Man being restor'd to him from this Inscription, no ancient Monument else calling him other than Crispinus: Lamprid. p. 61, 63.) Tullius Crispinus was the Praefectus Praetorio under Didius Julia­nus; but he cannot be the Man; but there was another Crispinus, a Man of the Consular Dignity, who with Meno­philus, Capitolin. Maximini. 2. p. 146. after the barbarous Murther of Alexander Severus, maintained Aqui­leia against Maximinus, who in vain besieg'd it. They were both sent by the Senate to preserve that important Place; Id. p. to 169. and they maintain'd their Pro­vince with so much Courage, that the Soldiers dispairing to take the City, fell upon their Generals, and slew both Maximin and his Son, in their Tents. The same Crispinus had been long be­fore Collegue with Julianus in the Con­sulship ann. ⅔. of Alexander Severus, of Christ 224. from the Death of A­lexander the Great 547. and from the Year of Augustus (or the Epocha of the Battel at Actium) 253. say the ancient Fasti, publisht by the most Learned [Page 317] Dodwell. Upon this General Crispinus Zenobius of Palmyra, was a constant Attendant, assisting the Auxiliary Troops with whatever Necessaries they stood in need of in those barren De­sarts; [...]: i. e. Vexillatio­nibus, Vexillariis, or auxiliariis, the words being of an equivalent inport; for those very Troops, V. Salmas­in H. A. Script. p. 125.455. which Taci­tus calls in one place auxiliorum co­hortes, he presently after stiles vexil­lares cohortes, the whole Roman Ar­my being divided into their own Legions; and Auxiliaries, says Mon­sieur Saumaise, auxilia in cohortes di­visa, cohortes in vexilla, ita (que) cohors semper de auxiliis, & vexilla de co­hortibus; the Dux Vexillorum in the Inscriptions being the same with the Praepositus auxiliorum.

Zenobius was also [...], or ae­dile of his City, (the Office I have al­ready accounted for) and he adorn'd his Province with great Magnificence, for so I read [...] (or [...]) [...], the Phrase [...] frequently occuring in [Page 318]these, as in several other Inscriptions; and for this Reason, among others, he is honour'd with the Title of a good Magistrate, [...];) for this generous and beloved Officer had his publick Testimonies, that he deserv'd the noblest Character that could have been given of him, since both the Gods and Men were Vouchers for his Merit; the God Jaribolus, Juli­us Philippus, the Praefectus Praetorio of the East, together with all his fellow-Citizens, having publickly attested his Love to his Country. Of the God Ja­ribolus, P. 168, 169 and his Oracle, I have spoken already; and the Monument it self is an undeniable Proof of the Regard his Country had to him, and with what respect the Roman Governour of the East treated him. Who this Praefectus Praetorio of the East was, will be easily found, if we reflect on the Date of the Inscription, an. aer. Seleucid. 554. i. e. Christi 242. the year before the young­est Gordian was slain; at which time Julius Philippus the Arabian, was the Praefectus Praet. of the East.

Capitolinus affirms, P. 161, 162. that Gordian pro­claim'd the War, and went into Persia, [Page 319]when Praetextatus and Atticus were Consuls: i. e. says Onuphrius, in the year of Christ, according to the vulgar Computation, 242. for then C. Ausidi­us Atticus, and C. Ausinius Praetexta­tus were Consuls; that Misitheus died, and Philip succeeded him, Apriano, and Papo Coss. that is, the year after, an Christi 243. for then C. Julius Ar­rianus, and Aemilius Papus were Con­suls; but that the Year following, when Peregrinus, and Fulvius Aemilianus were Consuls, Gordian was slain the first of March, and Philip succeeded him. So say the Fasti of Idatius, and others; and so says Cassiodore, (that in the Consulate of Peregrinus and Aemi­lianus, Gordian was slain by Philip, as he was returning home crown'd with Lawrel for the Conquest of the Persi­ans, not far from the Roman Territo­ries near Circesium; for there he was buried, that being the Roman Bounda­ry toward the East; and that the Army built him a Tomb on the Euphrates, the Place being called the Sepulchre of Gor­dian, says Aur. Victor, but carried his Bones to Rome:) nor do the Fasti in Sir H. Savil's MS. set out by Mr. Dod­well, [Page 320]disagree, only they fix the Con­suls a year higher, which the Palmy­rene Inscription confirms, in which Philip is expresly said to have been the Praefectus Praetorio of the East; an. 554. h. e. Chr. 242.

From whence also we may collect, that the City of Palmyra was in the Expedition of Gordian, as well as in that of Alexander a Confederate, and an Assistant to the Romans. How that Common-wealth behaved it self toward Philip the Murtherer, and Successor of Gordian, we have no Records; but from the rasure in the Inscription we may conclude, that they hated his Name and Memory: In truth so odious were the Person and Actions of Philip, that no one Historian, that I remember, hath written his Life; and those who treat of him by the by, call him perfidious Wretch. Aurelius Victor stiles him Thraconites, i. e. a Native of the Region of Traconitis, (born at Bostra in Arabia says Tristan,) he was of a very mean Parentage and Original; his Father a true Arab, a Captain of Banditi, (his name Saturninus, says Tristan) his Life ignominious, and his Death such as he [Page 321]deserv'd, being sacrificed by Decius to the angry Manes of his Predecessor; 'tis true, Eutropius affirms, that he was deify'd after his Death, but so were many of the worst of Emperors. Af­ter he assum'd the Purple, he made an ignominious Peace with the Persians, and leaving his Brother Priscus his Go­vernour of the East, Zosim. l. 1. p. 20. he march't to Rome. Priscus behav'd himself so inso­lently in his Office, and laid such hea­vy Taxes on the People, that in a lit­tle time he became insufferable, inso­much that the Natives betook them­selves to their Arms, and chose Papia­nus (others call him Jotapianus) Em­peror, having, as it is very probable, slain Priscus; and Philip himself a little time after fell by the hand of Decius. And at this time, I believe, the rasure was made in the Inscription at Palmyra, it being no unusual Practice both at Rome and in the East, as to deface the Statues of eminent Persons, when fallen into dis­grace; so to scratch out their Names out of the honorary Inscriptions, devo­ted to their Memory: Thus in an Epi­graphe at Rome, Grut. 161. [...] the name of Stilicho is eras't, (though his Titles are left un­toucht, [Page 322]as in the Palmyrene Inscription, V. C. & inlustris militis, & magistri utri­us (que) militiae,) as is also the name of Fl. Macrobius Longinianus the then Go­vernor of Rome: Grut. 178.8.330.3. the name of Maximi­anus in a 2d, of Commodus in a 3d, to o­mit other Instances.

8.

[...].
S. P. Q (Palmyrenus) Septimium (Orodem) optimum Procuratorem Duce­narium Augusti, qui oleum curavit do­nandum Metropoli coloniae, qui (que) privatâ impensâ, & suo sumptu commeatum mer­catoribus iter commune facientibus prae­buit; & à negotiorum praesidibus am­plum testimonium adeptus est; fortiter, & cum laude militantem, & aedilem e­jusdem Metropolews coloniae, plurimas [Page 323]etiam opes domi impendentem; ideo (que) pla­centem eidem senatui, Populo (que) & nunc magnificè Modimperatorem agentem in sacrificiis Jovis Beli, honoris ergo coluit. Ann. ..... mense Martio.

In three several Inscriptions erected to the Honour of Septimius Orodes, this by the Senate of Palmyra, and two o­thers by his Friend Julius Palmes, (for I no way doubt, but they all belong to the same Illustrious Person, and were set up in the same Year, and the same Month;) he is said to have been the Procurator Ducenarius to Odaenathus, (for there could be no other Emperor at Palmyra in the Year of Christ 266.) and to have done many good Offices for his Country, particularly for the Merchants, who honour'd him with a publick Testimonial of their Gratitude; what the Office of the [...] was, Vid. Appen. cap. 3. what the [...], and [...], I have al­ready declar'd: the imperfect word .... [...] is by Mr. Halley rendred [...], (it being unquestionable, that the Ancients did distribute, besides Bread, and other Largesses, Flesh to [Page 324]the People; the Law calls it Visceratio, and the old Glossary, Visceratio, [...];) but if I might be allowed the liberty of making ano­ther Conjecture, I would read it [...], (or as the Syrian Graver might spell it [...]) the Custom of bestowing Oyl upon the Citizens on solemn Festivals, being well under­stood: Cestrania Severina gave a great Sum to the Colledge of the Den­drophori, Grut. 312.4 that every year upon her Birth-day such a quantity of Oyl might be distributed to every one of them. And T. Fundilius Geminus gave, Id. 414.2. besides his Bequest to the Chest of the Augu­stales, and the Magistrates, &c. to the People a Feast, Id. 136.5. and a Largess of Oyl on his Birth-day. And L. Caecilius be­queath'd to the Inhabitants of Como e­very year on the Feast of Neptune, Oyl for their Gymnasia, and their Baths, and for the Exercises in the publick Places of Sport, (as I would rendert he words, in campo.)

I have read [...], (as many other Eastern Cities are stiled in the Coins) though Monsieur Patin, P. 130. &c. in his Edition of the [Page 325]Coins of Maurocenus, retains [...] in those of the Cities of Emsea, Carrae, and Antioch, (Cities of the East not far from Palmyra;) in all which I am of opinion, the word should be ren­dred Metropolis colonia, [...] never appearing in any Lexicon; [...] is rendred by the Critics Conjunctio in via, or iter commune; and Septimius is magnified in the Inscription for his defraying the Expence of the Caravan, for which reason the Presidents of the Merchants in a publick Meeting gave him their Testimonial, according to custom: Grut. 309.1. So Metrodorus the Son of Her­mogenes, the Grandson of Metrodorus, was honoured with a Testimonial from the whole Synod, or Colledge of Priests of Ceres, and advanc'd to the Office of Stephanephorus, or the President, of their Country in holy things, ( [...]) and others are said to have been ( [...]) rewarded with the Thanks of their publick Assemblies; Inscript. Cossou. n. 12. the Merits of Septimius were as illustri­ous as his Country's Love toward him: He had obliged their private Societies, and been very magnificent to the whole [Page 326]City; he had been an Officer, and be­hav'd himself with Courage and Repu­tation under his Prince Odaenathus, pro­bably when he routed the Persians; and was that year, when the Monument was erected, the Symposiarch in the Festival dedicated to Jupiter Belus their Patron Deity, viz. in the year 266. after Christ, and of the Empire of Odaenathus the [...]/ [...].

9.

I proceed in the next place to consi­der the Monuments erected by private Persons to the Memory of their Friends: The first of which contains the grateful Remembrance which the Palmyrene Merchants, trading to Vologesias, retain'd of the great Services, which Julius Au­relius Zebeidas did them in that Expe­dition.

[...]....

Which, with leave to fill up the va­cant Spaces, and to correct the Mi­stakes, may thus be read and rendred:

[...]....
Julium Aurelium Zebeidam Mocimi F. Zebeidae N. perpetuum commercii cu­ratorem qui cum illo descenderunt ad em­porium Vologessiam elegerunt, virum iis gratissimum, cultûs gratiâ: Mense Mar­tio, anno 558. h. e. Christi 246. Phi­lippi Arabis Imp. 2 o.

That Palmyra was a City of great Trade, and the Inhabitants eminent Merchants, hath been already prov'd from Appian and Pliny; as also that their Commerce was maintain'd both with Persia and the Western Empire; which also was done by other Frontier Cities, though under the Jurisdiction of the Roman Princes, as by Nisibis and Edessa; of whom the old Geogra­pher says, that ‘they were peopled with Men of condition, excellently skill'd in all the Methods of Trade, [...]. §. 16. p. 10 great Navigators, very rich, and Ma­sters [Page 328]of all worldly Plenty; that what they bought of the Persians, they sold to the Romans, dealing in all sort of Commodities, but Con­traband Goods, Brass and Iron, which they were forbidden to sell to the Enemies of Persia. Which Character seems exactly suited to the Palmyrene Merchants.

For that they traded to Vologesias, (a City under the Persian Jurisdiction) is plain from the Inscription; in which [...] is neither the Town of Olgas­sus, nor the Name of a Man, but of a famous City on the Euphrates, not far from its Confluence with the Tigris. Babylon, says Nat. Hist. l. 6. §. 30. p. 71⅔. Pliny, was once the Seat of the Eastern Empire, and the great Mart of Trade; but it fell into decay, when Seleucus Nicator built Seleucia, where the two Rivers meet, situated in a most fruitful Soil, and commonly called Babylon. To eclipse the Glory, and lower the Trade of Seleucia; the Parthians, after they had made them­selves Masters of the East, built Ctesi­phon, three miles from Seleucia on the Eastern Bank of Tigris, and there sixt the Residence of their Kings; but, this [Page 329]Project not answering expectation, King Vologeses (who in a Coin in the Cabi­net of Pope Alexander the 7th, is stiled [...], with all his lofty Titles, ac­cording to the Rhodomontade of the Parthian and Persian Kings; [...]; to which Epithets, in another Coin in Monsieur Patin, is added [...]) being Con­temporary with Nero and Vespasian, built another City, which from his own Name he called Vologesocerta, in the Neighbourhood, (18 miles distant, say the Peutinger Tables;) but to the South of Babylon, and there, probably, fixt the staple of Trade from the Persi­an Gulph, and the other parts of the East. This City is called by Stephanus [...], by Ptolomee [...]; Volocessia in the Peutinger Tables, and Vologessia by Ammianus Marcellinus; but by Pliny, according to the Persic Ter­mination, Vologesocerta. [...], says Hesychius; to prove which Assertion there is an eminent Passage in Pliny; N. H. l. 6. §. 10. p. 66¾. that among the Cities of Armenia the Less, Armosate is situate near the Euphrates, Carcathiocerta near the Tigris, (which Lib. 11. p. 527. Strabo affirms, was [Page 330]the Royal City of Sophene;) but on the Mountains Tigranocerta stood. And for Artasigarta, which Ptolemee L. 5. c. 13. places in Armenia the Greater, I would read Ar­taxicerta; Zadracarta being also the chief City of Hyrcania, says Lib. 3. de exped Alex. p. 71. Arrian. And I cannot but remark, that this word, either in Termination, or Prae­fixt, in almost all Languages signifies a City. In Hebrew Kiriath-Arba is the City of Arba, Kiriath-Sepher is the Ci­ty of Books; in the Punick, Carthage is the new City, in the Scythian, Carpa­luk the City of Fish; says Tzetzes, Chil. 8. c. 224. [...]. And in our own British Cair-Lundein, London; Cair-Kent, Canterbu­ry; Cair-went, Winchester, &c. and probably among the Aegyptians Gran-Cair hath its name from this Original, or al Cahira, as the Arabians call it.

To this City Vologesia, the Mer­chants of Palmyra traded, not long af­ter it was made a Mart by the King, who founded it; but the Commerce was often interrupted by the frequent Wars made by the Romans and Persi­ans against each other; particularly during the Expedition of Gordianus in­to [Page 331]the East; but when Philip the Arab, having murdred that excellent Empe­ror, succeeded him, and made an igno­minious Peace with Sapores in the first year of his Reign, the Persian Compa­ny at Palmyra sent Julius Aurelius Ze­beidas, with other eminent Persons of their Society, to Vologesia to re-establish their Factory, and adjust all Differen­ces that had happen'd since the War broke out; And he discharg'd that Of­fice so faithfully, and so much to their Satisfaction, that upon his return they erected a Monument with an honorary Inscription to his Memory, which is still preserv'd, and as a Reward of his great Services, chose him their Presi­dent. For so I am inclin'd to read that broken, and unintelligible part of the Inscription; [...]; i. e. [...]; curator; say the Lexicogra­phers; it commonly signifies rerum di­vinarum curatorem, [...], but here a President or Inspector. [...], says Hesychius.

The two following Inscriptions con­cern the same Persons.

10.

[...].
Septimium Orodem optimum Procura­torem Augusti Ducenarium & Archege­tam Julius Aurelius Palmes Cassiani F. Melenaei N. Eques Romanus amicum, & Patronum. Anno 578. mense Martio; h. e. Christi 266. Odenathi 2 o.

11.

[...].
Septimium Orodem optimum Procura­torem Augusti Ducenarium, & Archege­tam Julius Aurelius Palmes, Publius Me­lenaeus [Page 333]Malchi F. Nassumi N. vir prae­stantissimus amicum, & patronum honoris ergo anno .... mense Martio, (colue­runt.)

Of Septimius Orodes, I have discours't in the Comment on the eighth Inscrip­tion, and of his eminent Employments under Odaenathus, as his Procurator Ducenarius, and in the City, as their Aedilis and Symposiarch; in these two Inscriptions he is stiled [...], (for so I would read the unintelligible [...] not [...], as Mr. Halley conjectures; the Praefectus annonae, the Officer, who took care the City should not want Bread; because he is said to be [...] the Patron of Julius Aurelius Palmes the Roman Knight, who was not a Native of Palmyra, the Γ and Ρ being Letters easily mistaken one for the other; and in one Copy of the Inscription it is thus written, ΑΡλ­ΠΗΤΗΝ.) Now the Archegeta was the Chief, or President of his Tribe, says Hesychius ( V. [...], Id. v. [...]) the Heroe, from whom the Tribe had its name; they were [Page 334]honour'd with Statues of Brass, says the V. [...] v. loc. Etymolog. magnum, and were Persons of the most eminent Dignity; their number at Athens was ten Erechtheus, Aegeus, Pandion, &c. and of the same number were their Tribes; their Au­thority was great, and their Power ex­tensive, ( Hes. [...]: Theodorit, l. 3. [...], citing Plutarch deoracul. defectu, calls Arsalus, Aryus, and Tosobis, whom Saturn slew, but the Lycians deify'd, [...], whom Plutarch calls [...]; and the same Author in the Life of Lycurgus, says the King of Sparta was their [...]) the name was particularly given to those who were the Leaders or Captains of Colo­nies, when they were transplanted, and their Protectors: So [...]. 6. Xenophon says of Hercules, [...]. Vit. Alci­biad. Plutarch of Minerva, [...]; and the old Inscription to Apol­lo, in Monsieur It. Athen. p. 150. Spon. [...]; as he is also stiled by Thucydides L. 6. n. 3. p. 349., who mentions an Altar erected to Apol­lo [...], by the Inhabitants of Chalcis, who left Eubaea, and built Naxus, upon which the Priests ( [...]) [Page 335]used to offer Sacrifice, before they left Sicily, whenever they undertook a Voyage. Apollo was so called, says the old Scholiast upon Pindar V. Cluver. Sicil. p. 93, 94., be­cause he was the Author of that Expe­dition of the Naxians, when they went into Sicily; or as Lib. 5. Bell. civil. p. 734. Appian says, [...].

This President, or Prince of the Tribe, was sometimes stiled the Phy­larchus, ( [...] in He­sychius) or [...], as it is in the Ancyran Inscription above mention'd; p. 240. for where-ever the [...] is named, V. Memor. Cosson. p. 14½. the [...] is also named in the same In­scription. And the Phylarchs of the Saracens were so called, because the Peo­ple were divided into 12 Tribes; over every one of which was establish'd a Prince, called the Phylarchus, a Custom kept up by the Goths, and other barba­rous Nations. To what number the Tribes at Palmyra amounted, I know not; but that Septimius Orodes was the chief of one of them, is manifest from the Inscription; nor do I doubt but those Chiefs had the power to admit a [Page 336]Foreigner to the Priviledges of the Tribe, and to give him their Protecti­on; and therefore Orodes is said to be Friend to Julius Aurelius Palmes, and his Patron. ( [...]) Hesyc. [...] Gloss. vet. [...] Pratroci­nium, [...] Patronus, praepositus. And Harpocration affirms, V. [...], & [...]. that no Foreigner was permitted to leave his own City, and to settle at Athens, unless one of the Citizens undertook to be his Patron, ( [...]) the fine the Foreigner, when so patro­niz'd, paid to the City was 12 Drach­mas, called from those who paid the Tax [...], which whosoever refused to lay down, he was brought to the ( [...]) Officers, who took care of their Tolls, and sold, being for the most part condemn'd to the Gallies. Nor can I doubt but the same Custom of Patro­nizing Foreigners was observ'd in o­ther Cities, particularly at Palmyra; this Patronage sometimes covered only private Persons: Marm. Cos­lon. 5. Thus at Ancyra, Fla­vianus Eutyches acknowledges, C. Ael. Flavianus Sulpicius his Patron, Γ. [...], [Page 337]( Lege [...]) [...]. Eutyches, I doubt not, was his Libertus, and acknowledg'd the Patronage of his quondam Master, who had made him free; such Testimonials of Gratitude being as usual, as just, (and sometimes it happen'd the Freedman himself became a Patron; so. Grut. 610.3. Tiberius Claudius the Libertus of Augustus, is cal­led the Patron of his Parents, to whom he erected a Monument.) Sometimes the Patronage reach'd Societies, and Companies of Trade, (so we read of the Patrons of the Colleges of the Arvales, Grut. pass. the Dendrophori, the Companies of Smiths, the Braziers, the Fishermen, and Shipwrights, &c.) sometimes whole Cities and Regions, and the Title and Office was very honourable, C. Torasius being by the unanimous Suffrages of the Magistrates chosen the Patron of a Town by the River Clitumnus, (ob me­rita ejus erga Remp.) for his great Ser­vices done to the Common-wealth.

This Patronage it was requisite that even the Romans themselves (during the Reign of Odenathus in the East, in whose time the Inscriptions were made) [Page 338]should court, as Julius Palmes did; I call him Palmes because it is a known Ro­man name, (and perhaps Melenaeus should be written Mellinius, or Menela­us) for which reason I have inserted Publius for Puilsus. He was a Man of the Equestrian Dignity, which intitled him at Rome to eminent Privileges; which I shall not minutely enumerate, only mentioning, that the Roman Knights install'd the Princeps juventu­tis, presenting him with a Horseman's Shield, ( Parma) and a Silver Spear; for so says the Ancyran Marble, as Gronovi­us judiciously hath supplied the eras't Letters. Marm. An­cyr. p. 60.84. Equites autem Romani univer­si Principem Juventutis Romanorum par­mis utrum (que) & hastis argenteis donatum appellaverunt; for that both Caius and Lucius were Principes juventutis, the Coins put out of all doubt: And that whenever a Native of any of the Ro­mon Colonies was admitted to the Ho­nour of being made a Roman Knight, he reckon'd the Privilege among his no­blest Titles: Grut. 388.4.400.3. Marm. Cos. son. p. 141. So L. Claudius, the chief­est Person of the Island of Malta, glories in the Honour, as does Fl. Aelianus, (or Ti. Flavius Taeanus, as it is written in [Page 339]the Marble of Cosson) though the High­priest of the whole Province of Galatia, and Galatarches, the 2d Founder of his native City Ancyra, and their Embassa­dor to the Emperor Antoninus.

12.

[...].
Septimium Airanem Odaenathi filium senatorem eminentissimum.

I have already prov'd it not unlike­ly, that this Airanes was the Son of the Emperor Odaenathus, before he assum'd the Purple, from his name Septimius, the name of his Father being also inser­ted, and from the Date of the follow­ing Inscription on the same Pillar, viz. ann. Christi 251. but 13 years before Odaenathus was chosen by Gallienus, his Co-partner in the Government of the World.

13.

[...].
Aurelius Valerius Heliodorus Prae­fectus Legionis Illyriciorum in honorem Patrum, & gratulationis ergô anno 363. h. e. Chr. 251. Decii ult.

I have given the name Valerius to Heliodorus to fill up the Vacancy, be­cause it occurs elsewhere, ( L. P. Vale­rius Heliodorus) and because the [...] that appears before [...]. seems to be last Letter of [...], a like Vacancy occur­ring in the same name in another In­scription. This Heliodorus was, I doubt not, either the Son of, if not the same Person with, Lucius Aurelius Heliodo­rus. the Son of Antiochus, a Citizen of Palmyra; who in an Inscription at Rome, publisht by Gruter, (but more accurate­ly by Tristan and Spon) erected a Silver Statue, ( [...]) with all its Ornaments, to Aglibelus and Malachbelus, the Gods of his Country, for the safety of him­self, his Wife and Children, in the Year 547. according to the Computation of his Country, but in the Year of Christ 235. being the last year of the Reign of Alexander Severus, the Inscription late­ly found at Palmyra bearing date 16 [Page 341]years after, ann. Chr. 251. which was the last year of the Emperor Decius. He is stiled [...], in the Marble at Rome, ( Tristan reads it [...]) not because an Inhabitant of Pal­myra, which from their Benefactor was called Hadrianople; for then it should have been written [...], but by mistake of the Graver, or Transcri­ber; for [...], he being one of the College of Priests ( Sodalis Hadri­analis) dedicated to the Service of that Emperor, after the Senate had deify'd him: For, that he was acknowledg'd a God at Palmyra, is plain from another Inscription; in which he is called, [...]. And in that City, I doubt not but Heliodorus was one of his Priests, [...] a Priest of Hadrian, as [...] a Temple built to his Memory, and [...], the Plays instituted to his Honour. I call him [...], the same with [...], which occurs in another Reines. cl. VI. n. 101. In­scription, (or [...] for [...], Propraetore) and have given him the Command of the Illyrian Legion, because in after-times (and probably in the days of Decius) that Legion was [Page 342]deputed to lye in Garrison at Palmyra, as says the Notitia of the Oriental Em­pire; Sub Duce Phaenices Praefecturae, (or, as it is much better in the MS. Praefectus) Legionis primae Illyriciorum Palmyrae.

Against my Opinion, that both the Inscriptions concern the same Person, I have met with but one Objection; that in the one Marble he is called a Priest, in the other a Soldier, as if the Offices were incompatible: But the Answer to the Objection is very easy, since it was usual in those days for one and the same Person, to put on the Sa­cerdotal Habit, and the Military, (as there have been in all the later Ages of the Church Martial Bishops and Priests) to omit the Emperors, who were for the most part Generals of their own Armies, and at the same time High-Priests; and to confine my self to the College of Priests deputed to the Ser­vice of Hadrian: Grut. XLV. 9. Lucius Ragonius was a Sodalis Hadrianalis, & Legatus Legio­nis 13. Geminae. ccccxii. 2. Septimius Aper Octavius is stiled Sodalis Hadrianalis, and Sevir turmae secundae Equitum Ro­manorum; and MXC. 13. M. Aelius Aurelius Cleo, [Page 343]is called Sodalis Hadrianalis, & Tribu­nus militum, & Laticlavus Legionis 12. Fulminatricis. To which I may add, that Marc Antony to ingratiate himself with Augustus, as Appian affirms, be­came one of the Priests of Julius Cae­sar; and DLXV. 4. Lucius Julius Bonatus was the High-Priest of all the Temples in Asia, and the General of the Forces of the Ly­dians. Other Instances of this kind fre­quently occur in the old Inscriptions.

Not is it a just Argument against my Emendation, that Heliodorus has many names, it not being unusual for the same Person to have 4 or 5 names; e. gr. Lu­cius Livius Sulpicius Galba, Titus Aeli­us Adrianus Antoninus, P. Licinius Py­aem. Priscus Juventianus: And among infinite other such Examples, that in Gruter comes nearest the Palmyrene; DCVIII. 7. L. P. Valerio Heliodoro Tr. Leg. 2. Ad­jutricis L. P. Valerius Chilo Filius ejus. I shall only add, that there was an Au­relius Heliodorus, a Freedman of one of the Caesars, whom Gruter mentions, but of which of the Caesars, or whither the same Heliodore with the Palmyrenian, I cannot determine.

14.

[...].
Rupilium Orodem Senatorem, & Du­um-virum Palmyrenum Belacabus Arsacis filius amicum cultûs gratià honoravit, anno 570. h. e. Christi 258. Valeria­ni 4 o.

Rupilius is a name that frequently oc­curs in the Books, and Marbles of the Ancients, and therefore I shall only mention Rupilius Bonus, whose Daugh­ter Rupilia Faustina was the Grand mo­ther by the Father's side to the Empe­ror Marcus Antoninus the Philosopher, says Capitolinus; P. 22. whither I have as hap­pily rendred the name of Rupilius Oro­des's Friend, who honour'd him with the Inscription, (or whither it should be read [...], Belas Sapo­ris filius, Arsacis nepos, or any other way) I think is not much material. The Titles of Orodes have been already considered.

15.

[...].
[...]
Malech, qui & Agrippa, Jaraei fil. Raaei nep. secundò scribam (civitatis Palmyrenae) in adventu Dei Hadriani, unguenta praebentem tam hospitibus, quàm incolis inservientem exercitui, — & tem­plum Jovis Beli (ornantem).

I have adventur'd to change the name Malen, which no where occurs, into Malech, ( N and X being Letters of similar shape, and make) which is a known, and common name among the Syrians and Arabs, among whom the Philosopher Porphyry was call'd Mal­chus, Malchus the High-Priest's Servant was probably of that Country, Am. Mar­cellin. l. 24. c. 2. and Ma­lech Podosaces was one of the Phy­larchs of Arabia, when Julian the Apo­state [Page 346]Emperor made his Expedition a­gainst the Persians: The Office of Ma­lech Agrippa was very honourable; he was Secretary of State to the Repub­lick of Palmyra, when Hadrian marcht into the East; i. e. in the 6th year of his Empire, anno Christi 122. says Eu­sebius. In which Expedition I am en­couraged by the broken parts of the Inscription, to believe he assisted the Army with his Person, and Services; the Fragments being somewhat like part of the 7th Inscription; that he was a Be­nefactor to his City and Country, ap­pears from the grateful Memorial erect­ed to his name; wherein mention is made of the Temple of Jupiter Belus, (so I have fill'd the Vacancy from ano­ther N. 8. Inscription;) to which, I question not but he had been a munificent Bene­factor; perhaps he had been Symposi­arch, as Septimius Orodes was after­wards. He also gave a Largess to the publick Baths at Palmyra of Oyl for all Persons, who should frequent those Bag­nio's, whether Strangers or Citizens; it being usual among the Ancients to make such Donations: So Gr. 376.5. L. Caecilius Cilo gave to the People of Como by his [Page 347]Will, Oyl for their Baths; [...], says the old Glossary. For the Baths of every City were lookt up­on not only as ornamental, but highly useful, and great Promoters of Health and Vigor; the building such Structures is reckon'd among the noblest Acts of Magnificence in Agrippa, Titus, Diocle­sian, Constantine, and others; the repair­ing of them when ruinous, esteem'd a Princely Benefaction; some are cele­brated for building Gynmasia, or Porti­cos, others for floring the Apartments with Marble, a third sort for bringing Water from a great distance for the Ser­vice of the Bagnio; and others made an allowance for the Oyl that should be spent there in the Gymnasia annext to the Bath; all which appears in the In­scriptions of Gruter. P. 180, 181. & pass. To these Privi­leges sometimes particular Persons were admitted, or particular Sexes, mixt Bathings being expresly prohibited, says Lampridius; in other places only the Freemen of the City, sometimes even Servants were allowed to frequent the place and Foreigners: P. 181.1. C. Arunceius Cotta Colonis incolis, hospitibus adven­toribus, servis (que) corum lavationem ex sua [Page 348]pecunia gratuitam perpetuo dedit; Capitolin. Anton. p. 19 & An­toninus Pius gave the People liberty to use his own Bath gratis. To the Bath there commonly was annext a Racket-Court (Spaeristerium) as well as a Bathing-place (Dioclesian in sphaeri­sterio nymfeum fieri curavit) where those, P. 178. in 5. who frequented the Bagnio, gave themselves their Heats, before they went into the Bath; so Martial,

Redde pilam, lonat aes thermarum; Lu­dere pergis?
Virgine vis solâ sotus adire domum?

As also a Gymnasium, or Palaestra, where they wrestled, and used other Exercises; so the same Martial, L. 3. cap. 68

Gymnasium thermae stadium est ex parte, recede,
Exuimur, nudos parce videre viros.

In the Bagnio there were two other A­partments, the Calidarium, or Stove, and the Tepidarium, called unguentarium, tepidarium unctuarium, by Pliny uncto­rium, L. 7. c. 32. Sect. 2. by Julius Pollux [...] ( [...]) [Page 349]into these the Wrestlers and o­thers went, when they had perform'd their Exercises: De sudo­rib. p. 455, 456, 459. Theophrastus affirms, that the generality of the Wrestlers, though healthy, had very strong and nauseous Sweats, ( Diotimus the Gym­nasiarch divides them into three sorts, according to the degrees of Exercise, and the several Changes made in the Body) and that if the Fueller made a strong Fire all of the sudden in the Stove, it caused a less Sweat; but if the Fire were encreast gradually, it was of more use. I shall not reckon up all the Officers of the Bagnio, (the Fornacator, the Den­drophori, Aquarii, Pilicrepi, &c.) but mention only the Alipta, whom Caelius Aurelianus calls Ʋnctor, and so does the old Glossary, [...], Ʋnctor; who anointed the Wrestlers; but this was the Office of an inferiour Servant, the Governour of the Bagnio was called the Alipta, says Jul. Pollux, L. 3. c. ult. & l. 7. c. 3. [...]; though the word was not allowed among the Ancients, being introduc'd by the Writers of the Midling Comedy, ( [...];) which is also acknow­ledg'd [Page 350]by the Author of the Etymologi­cum magnum, who affirms, that instead of [...], the Antients used the word [...]: But in process of time it was denizen'd; for the People of Spar­ta erected a Monument to Gaius Rubri­us Bianor the Aleiptes, Grut. 1090. 9. for his Gravity, according to the Lacedemonian Custom, and for his Vertue in the Gymnasia. But I cannot agree with the Translator of a­nother Inscription, 327 where [...] is rendred by Aliptae, for the [...] were not the Governours of the Gymnasium, but the [...] the Gentlemen, who perform'd their Exer­cises, and erected that Monument to Bato the Gymnasiarch, or Aliptes: The Office was very honourable, for the Gymnasiarch was often the High-Priest of the place for life, Grut. 313. 10. 316. 1. and honour'd with o­ther considerable Preferments; and it was reckon'd among his noblest Titles, that he was Governour of the Imperial Bagnio. Id. 327. The Office of the Gymnasiarch was annual, but it was often given for several years to the same Person, if he deserv'd well of the Society; for then, besides the Continuation in his Dignity, he was honour'd with a Crown of Gold, [Page 351]Statue, and Inscriptions to perpetuate his Name and Merit.

When a Bath was built, it was usual to give it a solemn Dedication: 178. 7. So Dioclesian and Maximian, Constantius and Galerius Emperors, with Severus and Maximian Caesars, consecrated the Baths of Dioclesian, (and probably for this rea­son does the Historian aggravate the Cruelty of Caracallus, Lamprid. p. 111. 112. that he murder'd several People of all Conditions in the Baths) and some eminent Persons were deputed Curators to super-intend the Building, that it might not fall into ruine, nor its Revenues be alienated, or employ'd to wrong uses. And such care was taken, that every thing should be kept in due repair, that though the Re­venue hath been alienated for many A­ges, yet the very Ruines of those pub­lick Buildings at Rome remain to this day very venerable.

16.

At Arsoffa, in the Ruines of a noble Church, upon the Chapiters of several Marble Pillars, that supported the Body or Nave of the Church, is inscrib'd the time of the Foundation of that sacred [Page 352]Building, which is said to have been erected when Sergius was Bishop of the place.

[...].
Episcopo Sergio consanguineo Maronii Chorepiscopi.

Whither Maron, or Maronius, in the Inscription, were the same with the Founder of the Sect of the Maronites, I cannot determine, nor whither the Church did belong to them; but it seems probable both from the name, and because the Maronites chief Resi­dence anciently, as now, was about Mount Libanus, and in the neighbour­ing places towards the Euphrates.

[...]
Leg. [...].
[...].
Jovi summo, maximo, & propitio Bo­lanus Zenobii filius, Airanis nepos, Mo­cimi pronepos. Matthae abnepos, cura­tor octavus electus fontis Aphacitidis sub Jaribolo Deo, aram suis sumptibus posuit, anno 474. mensis Octobris 20. h.e. Christi 162. M. Aurelii Antonini 2 o.

I have made the Emendation in the Inscription (which Mr. Hallifax con­fesseshe is not overconfident, thatit was rightly taken) upon the Authority of the ancient Writers, from whom we have unquestionable Evidence that the oracular Fountain, which the Men of Palmyra frequently consulted, was cal­led Aphaca, while of the name Ephca there are no footsteps, that I have met with, in Antiquity. P. 267, 268, &c. I have already in brief, given the History of the Foun­tain; to which I think fit to add, that the Worship of Venus in that place was very antient, Soz. Eccl. Hist. l. 2. c. 5 that the Temple was ve­ry famous, that it stood upon the Banks of the River Adonis, on the side of Mount Libanus, and was of old very il­lustrious, and much honoured; that up­on certain days, after the usual forms of [Page 354]Invocation, a Fire descended from the top of Mount Libanus, like a Star, and after it had hover'd a while up and down in the Air, plung'd it self at last into the River: The Inhabitants were of Opini­on, that the Star was Ʋrania, by which name they call Venus. To which the Historian adds, that the Temple was ut­terly destroy'd by the order of the Great Constantine, Hist. Eccl. l. 2. c. 18. as Eusebius avers, and with them agrees Socrates; but it is certain, the Worship, and the Apparitions were continued (if we may credit Zosimus and Damascius, two bigotted Zealots for Paganism;) for Zosimus in his time, (he lived in the fifth Century) mentions the Descent of the Star at a certain time of the year, agreeable to what Sozomen records, and Damascius (who lived a­bout a hundred years after Zosimus) vouches for the Truth and Frequency of those Apparitions in his time: It is therefore very probable, that the Peo­ple of Heliopolis (as of Emesa, and o­ther parts of Libanesia) being warm Favourers of the Heathen Rites, would not easily suffer themselves to be wean­ed from their Idolatry; but repaired their Temple, and adorn'd it, though [Page 355]not with so great Pomp and Splendor; for though Sozomen says expresly, that the Temple of Venus at Heliopolis was ruin'd by Constantine's order, yet in the latter end of Constantius's Reign, it was very famous again, saith the [...]. §. 17. p. 14. old Geo­grapher set out by Gothofred, and wor­shipt with great Ceremony, ( [...]) it being the common O­pinion of the Country, that Venus dwelt there; and through her Favour so or­der'd it, that the Woman of Mount Li­banus were the fairest of all the Asia­ticks, as they were to a Proverb, ( So­crates says, that they held their Wo­men in common, and prostituted their Daughters to their Guests;) and I doubt not but under Julian, by whose Influ­ences and Assistance dying Paganism be­gan to recover some Strength and Vi­gour, the Temple also recovered its lost Reputation; for it is past all dispute, that the Temple at Nacle, was not ut­terly destroy'd till the days of Maho­met: So says Abulfarajus; Pococ. Spe­cim. Hist. Ar. p. 5. v. not. p. 90. for when he reckons up the several Idols of the old Gentile Arabs, which they worshipt be­fore that Imposter appear'd in the World, he says, the Inhabitants of Tha­kif [Page 356]worshipt a little Temple in the up­per part of Nachla, which was called Allat, (or Alilat, i. e. the Moon, or Venus, as the Arabs calls her;) and A­bulfeda avers, that the Idol was de­stroy'd and ruined, by the command of Mahomet, in the ninth year of the He­gira, i. e. in the year of Christ 631.

Near to the Temple of Venus at Na­cle, was the Well Aphaca situate; so the Castalian Fountain at Delphi, stood near the Temple of Apollo, V. Marm. Ox. p. 100. and another ora­cular Spring of that name in Daphne the Suburb of Antioch, rose near the Temple of the same God; which from the times of Seleucus, who built both the City and the Temple, was very fa­mous, till the Emperor Adrian fill'd the Well with stones, and stopt its Current: Julian open'd it again; but in a little time both Fountain and Temple were consum'd by Lightning from Heaven. How those Fountains gave their pro­phetick Answers, the ancient Writers are not agreed; some say the Enquirer wrote his Question on a Lawrel-leaf, and threw it into the Fountain; in which, when he took it out, he found his Fate written; others, that by the [Page 357]different noise of the Waters, either he, who consulted the Oracle, or the Priest, deputed to that Office, interpreted the Doom; while a third sort affirm, that the Priest drank the Water, and having by that means imbibed the Daemon, found himself fill'd with the Spirit of Prophecy, and inabled thereby to an­swer all Questions. How the Well A­phaca gave its Responses, Zosimus parti­cularly relates; according to which Method the famous Stygian-water at Bostra in Arabia unriddled Mens Desti­nies, Damase, a­pud. Phot. cod. 242. which Damascius describes as very terrible; for if the Daemon were pleas­ed, the lightest things thrown into it, would immediately sink to the bottom; but if the Daemon were angry, the big­gest and most ponderous things swam on the top for a while, and at last were thrown out to the Admiration of the By-standers. By this Well the Inhabi­tants used to swear; but if any one had been so hardy as to perjure himself, the Water that he drank caused a Dropsy in him within the year: Thus the Water of the Fountain Philostr. vit. Apoll. l. 1. c. 4. Am. Mar­cell. l. 23. c. 26. Arist. [...]. Asbamiaeus, near the Temple of Jupiter at Tyana was in taste smooth, and sweet to those who were [Page 358]honest and just; but if any Man hap­pen'd to run the hazard. when he in­tended to perjure himself, it affected his Eyes, his Hands and his Feet, and broke out upon him in Sores and Pu­stules, and great Swellings; nor could he move from the Well, till he had con­fest'd himself forsworn: So that the Water was ordeal, like the Water of Jealousy among the Jews, which to the Chaste gave a Conception, but to the Unjust, and the Violators of the Mar­riage-Vow, caused the Belly to swell, and the Thigh to rot. Of the like kind were the Fountains in Sicily, called Pa­lici, Arislot. ubi sup. c. 55. Sotion. de flumin ex Isigono. by which the People of the Island in cases of the greatest moment used to swear: He who took the Oath, wrote his Deposition on a Table, which he threw into the Water; if he attested the truth, the Table swom on the top of the Waters; if he were perjur'd, it sunk and disappear'd, and the Evidence was in a burning heat.

Of the Fountain Aphaca, was Bolanus one of the Curators, or Overseers, un­der the Inspection of Jaribolus the God; who, I suppose, had here his Oracle, and gave Directions in the choice of the Of­ficers [Page 359]belonging to it, as well as Testi­monials to those, who had discharg'd their Province with Honour. Jaribo­lus was doubless one of the [...], or [...], of that part of Syria, probably of the Moon, i. e. Venus, as Alagbelus and Malachbelus were Asses­sors of the Sun, (the Signification of the name implies it [...];) so the E­gyptians deputed Sigaleon to be the Par­hedrus to Sarapis, the Greeks Attis to the Mother of the Gods, Erichthonius to Minerva, Virbius to Diana, Hygeia and Telesphorus to Esculapius, Tychon to the Moon, and to Venus Adonis; and 'tis not the most improbable of Con­jectures, that he, whom the Greeks cal­led Adonis, the Syrians might stile Ja­ribolus, (as well as the Egyptians Tam­muz) Baal and Adonai being both equi­valent names of Power and Sovereign­ty. And in after Ages, when Emperors and others were allowed a solemn Con­secration, they also were honour'd with the Title of Collateral Judges to Jupiter, whose [...] were in the esteem of the Heathen World, V. Salm. in H.A. Scrip, p. 38. the twelve greater Gods; for when Alexander the Great was to be deify'd, he was call'd [Page 360]by Demades, the 13th of that Society; and when Alexander, while alive, was resolv'd to give his Darling Hephaestion a Deification, Lucian. non. temer. cred. calumn. the Greeks in Vain-flat­tery and Compliance sacrificed to him as an Assessor of the Gods, ( [...]) and they in­titled him to Apparitions, to Prophe­cies and Dreams, says Lucian, (and for this reason I suppose H. E. [...]. 4. c. 7. Eusebius joins [...] toge­ther, when he speaks of the Gnosticks:) This Pageantry of Canonization was acted over again by the Emperor Adri­an, to omit other Instances, when he Deify'd his Pathic Antinous, the Greeks of that Age attributing to him such O­racles as Hadrian himself had compo­sed, says P. 7. Capitolinus: To the Memory of that Catamite the Emperor built a City in Aegypt called by his name, An­tinoopolis; there he buried him, and there especially (though the Worship prevail'd elsewhere) he appointed him a Temple, Priests and Prophets, ( [...], says Apud Eu­seb. l. 4. c. 8. Hegesippus) of which num­ber was M. Ʋlpius Apollonius it 86. 1. Gru­ter, and perhaps 326. 1. Onias, who stiles [Page 361]himself the High-Priest, and Prophet in another Inscription, for that he was of Aegypt, his name convinces me: It must be confest, that in Egypt the most emi­nent Priest was called the Prophet, says Clemens of Alexandria; but probably for this reason, because they all pre­tended to the Spirit of Prophecy, espe­cially where there was an Oracle, as there was at Antinoopolis; and the Facul­ty of Prediction descended often from Fa­ther to Son, as well as the Priesthood, (which among the Greeks as well as the Jews, was often fixt to a Family;) for which reason T. Porcius is stiled the Son of Proclus Aelianus, a most illustri­ous Person, and a Prophet in an old Grut. 458. 1. Inscription; for among the Priests of Isis, (and probably among those devo­ted to any other Deity,) [...], says He­rodotus Lib. 2. V. Heliodor. l. 1.; if the Father happen'd to die, the Son succeeded him. The Ha­bit of these Prophets, says Lib. 5. Herodian, was a Vest, or Cassock, reaching down to the Feet, with long Sleeves; and in the middle of the Vest a stripe of Pur­ple, their Shoes being made of Linen: This, says the Historian, was the Ha­bit [Page 362]of the Priests of Phaenicia and Syria. Such an Oracle as this I am inclined to attribute to Jaribolus, (either at Nacle, or at Palmyra) from whence the Peo­ple derived their Predictions of what was to come, and their Testimonials of what was past; and perhaps the Ora­cle gave its Answers at the solemn Meetings, when great numbers of the People of the Country came to the Fountain; for that there were such ( [...]) Conventions at stated times, Zosimus affirms expresly; at which their Games were celebrated, (as the Agon Gymnicus call'd Heges. ub. sub. [...], was perform'd in honour of the Darling of Adrian) there being particular Officers deputed to that Service; the chief of which was the High-Priest, 318. 3. 330. 3. (the Ar­chiereus, or Primus Sacerdos synhodi, [...], as he is stiled in the Inscriptions) and under him the Cura­tors, or [...], of which number Bolanus was one at Aphaca, (for that I suppose to be the name of the Well, as Eros and Anteros were the names of two Fountains at Gadara, Asbamiaeus, Castalius, 179. 6. v. & 180. 1. &c. elsewhere.) In a famous Inscription in Gruter, the Masters or [Page 363]Governours of the Fons Palatinus, are reckon'd up, of whom some were first admitted to the Honour in that year when Octavius Lenas, and M. Antonius Rufinus were Consuls; others had born the Office a second time, some a third or fourth; and they are distinguisht from the inferior Officers, (their Mini­stri) of whom also some had done the Service a second, others a third year. In that Marble the number of Gover­nors is eleven, but in the next Inscrip­tion the Governours of the Fons Lollia­nus are but ten.

In this Inscription Jupiter is not only stiled Optimus Maximus, but Propitius [...], as an Acknowledgment of his Favours; so Isis and Diana are called [...] in other 40. 10. 73. 1. Inscriptions.

18.

[...].
Jovi maximo fulminanti pro salute Trajani Hadriani Domini sui Agathan­gelus Abilenus Decapolites camaram aedi­ficavit, & lectisternium propriis sumpti­bus posuit. Anno 445. mense Augusto; h. e. Christi 133. Hadrian 17.

This Marble was found at Tieve near three days Journey from Palmyra, in the Wall of a Mosque, which probably was the old Temple of Jupiter the Thun­derer, (who in other Inscriptions is sometimes stiled bronton, fulgurans, to­nans, fulgerator, &c.) in which Aga­thangelus erected a Cupola, and a Bed of State to the Honour of the God, and for the Safety or Recovery of his Prince. The name Agathangelus occurs else­where, ( Cn. Cossutius Agathangelus in 644. 1. Gruter;) ours is said to have been an Inhabitant of Abila, but at the same time a Decapolitan, which will no lon­ger seem a Difficulty, if we remember that not only Pliny avers, L. 5. c. 18. that the Geo­graphers were not agreed, what parti­cular Cities constituted the Decapolitan Region of Syria, though all confest the [Page 365]name to have been impos'd from the number of the Cities, and that the Te­trarches of Trachonitis, and Paneas, that Abila and Arca, &c. do intermix with, and encircle that Region; but that Pto­lome in express words (if we may cre­dit the Palatine MSS.) treating of the Cities of Syriae Caele, among which he principally names Heliopolis, Abila Ly­saniae, &c. calls them Cities of Decapo­lis; so that Agathangelus as to his Ci­ty was an Inhabitant of Abila, but of the Province or Region of Decapolis.

Agathangelus was a very Loyal Sub­ject, though he lived at a great distance from the Court; and for the Safety of his Prince built a Cupola, and set up a Bed of State under it to Jupiter, [...], formix testudo, in the old Glossaries: [...] in He­sychius. The antient Baths were so a­dorn'd, says Pliny, Lib. 2. Ep. 2. (fenestras è regione conditor binas confinio camerae pendentis admovit, ut suscipientium usui fabre­factum lacunar aperiret;) and the Sta­dia, or Palaestrae, (for in one of them P. Licinius Priscus built a Piazza, with several Cupolàs, [...];) [Page 366]sometimes the Tombs: Oxon. Marm. n. 79. So the Tomb of Nilus the Oeconomus of Asia was adorn'd; but particularly Temples and Churches: So when Justinian the Emperor new built the Trullus of the Church of San­cta Sophia, and enlarg'd it thirty feet in Circumference, he added two Cupo­la's to it, one toward the North, the other to the South, ( [...]) which continue to this day. Thus Au­gustus says of himself in the Ancyran Marble, Philip. 2. Pulvinar ad circum maximum, aedes in Capitolio fici; and Tully of M. Antony, who was one of the Priests of Julius, Nec majorem honorem Caesar conse­cutus est ab Antonio, quam ut haberet pulvinar, simulachrum, fastigium. Some Authors say, that the Tholus, Cupola, was a place in the middle of the Came­ra of the Temple, V. Guther. jur. Pontif. l. 3. c. 9. in which those who made Vows hung up their Offerings; others that the Camera was above the Cupola, like our Lanterns, (so says Phi­lander;) others, that the Camera was no other than the Cupola it self, which be­ing lessen'd by degrees, ended in a point. The Lectisternia are describ'd by L. 7. Ar­nobius; [Page 367]habent enim Dij Lectos, at (que) ut stratis possint mollioribus incubare pul­vinorum tollitur at (que) excitatur impressio. The Pagan Devotion inclining them to think, that their Gods ought not to want any thing conducive to their Ease and Satisfaction. Hesyc. [...], Glossar. vet. pulvinar [...].

Agathangelus built his Camera, and furnisht it with a Bed, to fulfil a Vow he had made for the Welfare of his Prince; V. Gruter. such Vows commonly occur in the old Inscriptions, [...]; pro salute & gloriâ, pro salute itûs ac redi­tûs Imperatoris, pro salute Imp. totiús (que) domûs divinae, pro salute, & incolumi­tate domûs divinae, pro salute, & glo­riâ, pro aeternitare Imperii, & salute Imperatoris. Sometimes they vow'd the Building a new Temple, or the Repair­ing an old one, sometimes the Adorn­ing a Temple with Pillars and Chapi­ters, with Porches, or Cupola's; at o­ther times the Offering of solemn and pompous Sacrifices, (so C. Betonius the first Priest of the Emperors, offer'd the [Page 368] Tauropolium of the whole Province of Narbonne, XXIX. 12. for the Safety of Septimius Severus, and M. Aurelius Antoninus Ca­racallus his Son, for so the Inscription must be read, M. Aurel. Ant. not M. Aureliani, for what hath the Emperor Aurelian to do with Septimius Severus?) and some Romans were so over offici­ous, that, when their Prince was sick, in expectancy of a great Reward, Dio. l. 59. p. 645. they devoted themselves to Death, ( [...]) so the Emperor might recover. So when Caius Caligula fell into a dange­rous Distemper, P. Afranius Potitus, a Plebeian, bound himself by an Oath, that himself would die, if Caligula might be cured; and Atanius Secundus, a Man of the Equestrian Dignity, promis'd to fight among the Gladiators for the same reason: And the Emperor was so sensi­ble of the Flattery, that he compell'd them both to be as good as their Pro­mises. We may adjust the Time of this Inscription by the Date; since the Coins inform us, that ann. 132. the 16th of Hadrian, the Senate and People of Rome made Vows for his Health, (Senatus populús (que) vota sus­cepta. [Page 369]Vota publica. Vota publica, S. c.) the same Persons in the year follow­ing paying their Thanks to Jupiter for his Recovery, (Jupiter custos. Jo­vi custodi, S. c.) to this Jupiter on the same occasion, Agathangelus in Syria, made his Vows, some months after the Romans had made theirs; the distance from Italy to that part of Asia upon the Euphrates, being to be allowed for.

19.

The next Inscription is singular as to its Language, and I shall endeavour to fill up the void spaces thus.

Conservatores orbis, & Propagatores generis humani D. D. N. N. Dioclesianus, & Maximianus Invictissimi Imperatores; & Constantius & Maximianus. Nobiles Caesares Castra faeliciter condiderunt

.. ntes Cassiano Hieroclete Viro probo Praeside provinciae Devoti Numini Majestati (que) eorum.

I have inserted the name of Maximi­nus, ( Herculius) because he was at that time the sole Co-partner of the Empire with Dioclesian: I call them Conserva­tores orbis, and invictissimi, from their Coins; and I have chang'd the Prae­nomen of Hierocles into Cassianus, which is well known to be Roman, while Ossianus no where occurs; the time when the Marble was erected has been already adjusted; P. 148, 149 for then Dio­clesian built several Castles upon the Euphrates, or rather then he built the Castr Caircesia; for tho' it was a Fron­tier Castle before that time, ( Gordian, when slain by Philip, having been buried there, L. 23. c. 5. as Capitolinus avers, though Am. Marcellinus, who had been at the place, says his Tomb was not at Circesium, but at Zaitha seven miles from it: Zosi­mus says it was at Dura, Eutropius and Rufus twenty miles from Circesium;) yet it was so poor and weak a place, says Ammianus, till Dioclesian fortified it with strong Walls and Towers, that for that reason he may be with justice said to have built the Castle, as those who [Page 371]have beautified decay'd Cities, are com­monly stiled by the Greeks ( [...]) the Founders of those Places.

20.

In the ruines of Briadeen, the follow­ing Inscription was found.

[...].

It seems to have been inscrib'd on an Altar, or some Pillar of a Temple dedi­cated to Minerva Lindia, for so I would correct and read it;

[...].
Consecratum fuit Minervae Lindiae à Materno, & Pappo, & Marco in hono­rem, (Deae.) Anno 541. h. e. 229. Christi. Alexandri Severi 8.

That Alexander Severus was the Darling of the East, no Man will doubt, who considers that he was not only born in Syria, but had made a victori­ous Expedition into Persia to secure the Quiet of his Native Country; and that for his illustrious Qualities he was dei­fy'd in Libanesia and Palmyrene, as well as at Rome. In his Reign was the In­scription set up at Briadeen (possibly to fulfil a Vow for his Preservation) in honour of Minerva Lindia. Lindus is Rhodes, says Suidas V. [...]., the name both of the Island and City, where Minerva was worshipt with an extraordinary Devotion, the Inhabitants sacrificing to her every day, and every day making a Feast in her Temple. Narrat. 47. Conon tells us, that the Phaenicians having possest themselves of Rhodes, were driven out by the Carians; and that the Dorians, under the Conduct of Althaemenes, dis­posest the Carians, and built three Ci­ties in the Island, Lindus, Jalysus, and Camirus, which at last became one great City, called Rhodes after the name [Page 373]of the Island: And L. 2. c. 1. Apollodorus affirms, that Danaus having by the help of his Daughters, murther'd the Sons of his Brother Aegyptus, being his own Sons in Law, built a Ship by the advice of Minerva, in which himself and Daugh­ters fled out of Aegypt to Rhodes, where he dedicated the Image of Minerva Lindia. Minerva, says Fab. 277. Hyginus, built the Ship for Danaus, the first of the kind that ever was seen in Greece, says 7.46. Pliny: This Voyage of Danaus, com­menc't when Erichthon was King at A­thens, says the noble Collection of E­pocha's in the n. 9. Oxford-Marble, that his Daughters Amymone, Helice, and Archedice, being chosen by lot by the other Sisters, built the Temple upon the Shoar in the Maritime City of Rhodes, call'd Lindus; which, says L. 14. p. 655. Strabo, was situate toward the South, especially toward Alexandria: For in that City, as L. 5. p. 227. Diodorus Siculus affirms, he was hospitably received, and there­fore built the Temple, and consecrated the Statue; there he lost three of his Daughters, who died of the Pestilence, [Page 374]which then raged at Lindus, the rest sailed with their Father to Argos. The same Historian adds, that Cadmus not long after offer'd several Gifts in that Temple, among which was a Brass Ves­sel made à l'antique, with an Inscrip­tion in Phaenician Characters. But if we may believe the noble Marble, Cad­mus sailed to Thebes eight years before Danaus left Aegypt; so that that part of the Story is a Parachronism in Diodo­rus. A long time after Danaus's Death, Amasis the King of Aegypt presented the same Minerva of Lindus with two Sta­tues of Stone, Herod. l. 2. c. 102. and with a Linen Breast­plate of admirable Work, ( Thoraces li­nei being very usual among the ancient Captains, as Part. 2. l. 4. c. 11. Ferrarius unquestionably proves, and Minerva was a warlike Goddess, it was somewhat like our Silkarmors) because his Country-wo­men built that Temple: Which, Strabo says, was in his time very illustrious, and much frequented. Nor was she honour'd only in that Country, but in Syria, if we may credit the Inscription. In which I have put [...] for [...], [Page 375]though perhaps it should be Mal­chus. Hesyc. [...], 98.7. in Gruter.

21.

At Andreen, which lies between Bri­adeen and Aleppo, among the Ruines of an ancient Church, were found some broken Inscriptions, the Remains of the Devotions of the Christians of former Ages.

[...] [...] [...]....
Ego Johannes precatus Deum assecutus sum, (quod petii) & gratias agens Deo (votum solvi ut peccatis meis (sit pro­pitius.)

Over the Southern Door was written,

[...].
Porta haec Domini justificat intrantes per illam.

Over the Western Door, which I would read,

[...]
Christo Deo optimo Maximo.

These Inscriptions do not need a Commentary, since nothing difficult occurs in them; but they cannot but raise a deep Commiseration in all Christians to see so many venerable Remains of the ancient Piety either converted into Mosques, or buried in their own Ruines: No Churches ha­ving in past times been more illustri­ous for Religion, and good Letters, than the Oriental, in which at this time there are but some few footsteps of ei­ther, the rest being over-run with Bar­barism and Infidelity.

The next broken Inscription is also undoubtedly Christian, (as those where­in [Page 377]Θ [...] [...], and [...] appear;) and, I suppose, contain'd the names of the eminent Angels Ʋriel, Raphael, Ga­briel, Michael, (and perhaps the former Inscription may be thus rendred, [...], according to the form of a similar Epi­graphe in Gruter;) 1048.2. for it was not unu­sual to affix the names of those holy Angels upon the Christian Tombs, out of opinion to engage them to be Guar­dians of the Sepulchre (as the modern Pretenders to converse with Spirits, in­scribe their names usually on their U­tensils;) so in the Tomb of Mary the Wife of the Emperor Honorius, on a Plate, were written these names; Mi­chael, Gabriel, Raphael, Ʋriel. Id. 287.4.

I have now done with the Monu­ments of this once famous Country; and, because there is in every Man an innate Desire of living after he hath left this World, though all Men do not be­lieve there is another; and that they de­sire, when they are dead, to be remem­bred, and well spoken of, that their Acti­ons may not be confin'd to the same Grave with their Carcasses; I shall con­clude [Page 378]with the wise Saying of the Ro­man Orator, That whenever we see such Remains of venerable Antiquity, such lasting Records of the names, and Atchievements of great Persons, we are admonisht to take care so to regulate our Actions, that we may convince the World we have settled our prospect up­on the Rewards of Future Ages, and not on the Flatteries of the Present; and to remember, that Monuments being e­rected to the Memory of those, who have lived well in this World before they left it, put us in mind, that there is nothing here permanent, and immu­table, and that 'tis the Duty of conside­ring Men to aspire towards Immorta­lity.

A short Chronicle of Palmyra.

  • PAlmyra,
    Anno Per. Jul. 3720 Mund. 3010.
    built by Solomon after he had finisht the Temple, and his own House, which were 20 years in building.
  • Palmyra destroyed by Nebuchadnez­zar,
    P. J. 4125. M. 3415.
    before he laid Siege to Jeru­salem.
  • Marc. Antony,
    P. J. 4673. M. 3963. V. C. Varr. 713. ante Christ. 41.
    after the Battel of Philippi, went into Asia, and sent his Troops to pillage Pal­myra.
  • Hadrian, An. Christi 122. an. Imp. 6. went into the East, rebuilt (probably) Palmyra, and call'd it Hadrianople, when Malech Agrippa was the second time Secretary of that City.
  • [Page 380] circ. 216 Palmyra made a Roman Colony by the Emperor Caracallus, in his Ex­pedition into Parthia.
  • 227 The Republick of Palmyra assisted Alexander Severus against Ar­taxerxes King of Persia, Zenobius being their General.
  • 24⅔. The Republick assisted Gordian a­gainst the Persians, Zenobius being their General.
  • 260 Valerian was taken Prisoner by Sa­pores King of Persia.
  • Odenathus routed the Persians, 264 and was declared Emperor by Galli­enus.
  • Odenathus, 267 with his Son Herodian, slain by Maeonius. Maeonius, the Ephemerous Emperor of Palmyra, slain a few days after; then Ze­nobia assumes the Empire in her own name, and her Sons.
  • [Page 381] Zenobia routed Heraclianus, 26⅞. Gallie­nus's General. Vaballathus took the Empire.— Gallienus slain.
  • 268 Claudius chosen Emperor.
  • 270 Zenobia conquer'd Aegypt by her General Zabdas.
  • Claudius died. Quintillus reigned 16 days. Aurelian in the later end of the year was chosen Emperor.
  • Palmyra taken, 272 and ruin'd by Aure­lian, and Longinus slain; an. ⅚ of Vaballathus.
  • 213 Zenobia carried in triumph at Rome.
  • Hierocles, 298 Governor of Palmyrene under Dioclesian.
  • 52⅞. Justinian in the first year of his Reign, repaired and fortified Pal­myra.
  • [Page 382] 63 8/9. Palmyra was subjected by the Ma­hometans, Jabala the Son of Al Iham being then Lord of Tadhmur, and King of Gassan.
  • 659 The Battel of Tadhmur between Da­hacus and Adis.
  • Saleiman the Pseudo-Caliph, 746 beaten by Merwan, fled to Tadhmur.
  • 1172 Benjamin in Tudelensis was at Tadhmur.
  • Melhom, 1678 the Emîr, or Prince of Tadh­mur, when the English Merchants made their first Journey thither.
  • Hassine the Emîr, 1691 when the English Merchants went thither the se­cond time.
  • 1693 Dôr the Emîr of Tadhmur.

Additions and Emendations.

Page 193. add after Sociam. Nasorus is the same name with Nasir, Abunasir, Abdolnasir, Nasireddin, which frequently occur in the Saraccnick History. As does Am­rus in the same History, and in the Catalogue of the Kings of Gessan, in our Learned Pocock, Sochaeis the same with Sychaeus the Husband of Dido. Sampsus, &c. p. 240. l. 6. after Harpocration, add, tho' the [...] was proba­bly the chief Magistrate, or Decurio at Ancyra.

P. 301. l. 3. after Grammar add, perhaps for [...] we should read [...], (tho' Mr. H. positively avers, that it was written [...] in the Monument,) and then Elabelus, Mannaeus, Sochaeis, and Malchus, being all the Sons of Va­ballathus, Grand Sons of Mannaeus, Great-grand Sons of Elabelus, set up that Monument for themselves, and their Children; or rather (to assert the true reading) e­rected that Tomb ( [...]) to their Father Vaballathus, ( [...]) and to themselves, (and others, if there were any) his Children. This is one of the oldest Inscriptions at Pal­myra, erected anno Christi 102. the 5th of the Reign of the Emperor Trajan, Palma his Governor of Syria having some few years before reduc'd that part of Arabia under the Roman Power, says Dio. l. 68 [...]hich Age no other Monu­ment exceeds.

Besides Misaccentings, wrong Pointings, misplacing of Letters, and other little Faults, the Reader is desired, be­fore he enters upon the Book, to correct the following

ERRATA.

PAge 8. l. 17. preserve. P. 17. dele [...]. P. 20. l. 14. del. M. l. 26. r. Nice. p. 22. l. 21. when. p. 28. l. 6. a State. p. 35. l. 12. r. happen'd to fall sick. l. 21. 22. r. for in the seventeenth year of his Reign. p. 36. l. 3. r. who, living some years after, languisht. p. 48. Marg. Petri. p. 55. l. 15. f. for r. but. p. 58. l. 3. del. he. p. 59. r. an. 264. p. 62. l. 9. enraged. p. 72. l. 2. r. after which an. 268. p. 73. for probably r. doubtless. p. 86. del. the Marg. Note, and insert it p. 87. p. 118 l. 6. r. Marcellinus. l. 8. in the first year. p. 121. ch. XXVII. p. 131. l. 11. r. de­clar'd his Partner in the Empire. p. 139. Caenophrurium. [Page]p. 140. del. in all probability. p. 149. l. 5. r. washt. p. 166. l. 17. del. A. p. 193. [...]. p. 196. Heraclas. 201. Julius. 219. [...]. ib. [...]. 221. l. 26. [...]. 238. [...]. l. 12. brought. p. 239. l. 14. r. five. 248. l. 16. del. Jaribolus, and. p. 249. l. 26. [...]. 251. l. 12. r. Xiphiline, and del. the Marg. Note. p. 254. l. 2. the Emp. married Urania to his Country God Elaga­balus, the Moon being the fittest Wise for the Sun. 263. l. 29. Grandmother. p. 270. Marg. de Deá Syr. ed. ult. 293. l. 6. transcribe. 299. l. 4. [...]. 302. l. 13. fifth. ib. [...]. and Pani. l. 17. Chr. 138. p. 304. Marg. l. 2. chil. 310. l. 9. [...]. 311. calls him. 312. r. the same year, viz. the 4th of Alex. 313. l. 22. r. 226. p. 317. l. 3. commanding, and assisting. 325. Emesa. 332. l. 2. Person. 345. [...]. 348. Sonat. ib lotus. 350. l. 27. and then. 353. l. 7. An­ton. tertio. 360. l. pen. in Gr. 364. l. 15. del. and. 365. Tetrarchies. ib. Syria. ib. fornix. p. 366. feci.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.