Annotations upon his Animadversions on the Title, Dedication, &c.

AT first bolt in his Animadversions on the Title, the Dedication, and the Epistle to the Reader, he denounces sentence before inquiry but against the Book it self, forgetting already his subject, so early his brain circulates; and saith, that, Having perused the Book thorowly he is abundantly satisfied not only from his Stile, which is something Enthusiastick (his speech bewrays him) but from his matter and Principles if he stick to any, that the Author is a borderer upon Fanaticis [...]e and does not know it. Even as the Animadverter is upon Wit and Reason; for I have heard that Borderers for the most part, are at the greatest distance, and the most irreconcilable. What the Stile is of a Title, and what the Prin­ciples of a Dedication and Epistle to the Reader (for these, if any, the Animadverter ought here to have stuck to) it's indeed a weighty dis­quisition fit for a man of his Talent. But I have read them over, and so have others of better judgement, and find every sentence there­in poised with so much reverence, humility, and judicious Piety, that from an humane pen (allowing the Reader any tolerable share too of Humanity) I know not what more could have been expected. And as to the Matter, it seems to be but a Paraphrase upon the Principles of the Song of the Angels; Glory to God on high, on Earth Peace, Good Will toward men. If to speak at that rate, and upon such a subject, with so good an intention, be to have an Enthusiastick Stile or Fa­natical Principles, it is the first crime of which I should be glad to be guilty. What in the mean time shall we say to these men, who out of a perverse jealousy they have of the Non-conformists, ru [...], which few wise men do into the contrary extreme, affixing such odious names to every word or thing that is sober and serious, that with their good will they would render it impracticable for men even to discourse perti­nently concerning Religion or Christianity? Put it upon this short issue: If the stile of the Epistle before the Naked Truth be Enthusiastick and Fanatical, the stile of the Animadverter is presumed, and so allow­ed of, as Spiritual, Divine, and Canonical.

[Page 6] The first Evidence that he produces after so hasty a sentence against the Author, is out of the Book too, not out of the Title, Dedicati­on, or Epistle; that he has said p. 17. In the Primitive times when the whole world of Jews and Gentiles were enemies to the Church and not one of your Ceremonies to preserve it, the simple Naked Truth without any Surplice to cover it, without any Ecclesiastical Policy to maintaine it, overcame all, and so it would do now did we trust to it, and the Defender of it. And upon this he runs division. The Defender in Heaven, God; the Defender of the Faith His Majesty; and the many Defenders (among whom I suppose he reckons himself of the Principal) who may be trusted, This is all fooling, whereas the Author does manifestly intend it of God Almighty, and could not otherwise. For though His Majesty may well be trusted for his Reign with the Defence of the Naked Truth, yet most of us know that in the Primitive Times, His Ma­jesty was too young for that imployment, and that it was God alone who could then protect it, when the Defenders of the Faith were all Heathens, and most of them Persecutors of Christianity. He then descants no less upon Naked Truth; The Naked Truth of our Cause, or the Naked Truth of the Pamphlet, or, he knows not what Naked Truth. But he saith it should have been Truth Fle'd (so he had the Butchery of it) Which is like Pilate and no worse man, who when our Saviour told him, he came into the world John 18. 37. That he might bear witness to the Truth, asked him, What is Truth? and then though he confessed he found no evil in this man, delivered him over, against his Conscience, to be Stripped, Scourged, Fley'd, and afterwards Cruci­fied. Such like also is his talking, that this is Stripping the Church to skinne, nay skinne and all, and skinne for skinne: so wretchedly does he hunt over hedge and ditch for an University Quibble. The casual pro­gress and leaping consequences of any mans memory are more rational then this method of his understanding, and the Non-Conformists Concordance is a Discourse of more coherence then such Ammadver­sions: I have heard a mad man having got a word by the end ramble after the same manner: in this only he is true to himself, and can­did to the Author, having avowed that he had s [...]nn'd the Book thorow, this hacking and vain repetition being just like it, when we were at our

For as I remember this Scanning was a liberal Art that we learn'd at Grammar-School; and to Scann Verses as he does the Authors Prose, before we did, or were obliged to understand them. But his tugging all this while at skin, and skin for skin, and all that he has [Page 7] he will give for his life, meerly to hale in an ill favor'd Jeer at the Au­thor, and truly with some profaneness, for proposing the Naked Truth as necessary for the self preservation of our Church, and an expe­dient against Popery; is, (whatsoever the Animadverters judgement be) a retchlesness and mockery ill becoming his Character. And it savors of the Liquorishness of a Trencher-Chaplain, little concerned in the Curâ Animarum, so he may but Curare Cuticulam.

But as to his fastidious reproach of the Authors seeking of God, his Fasts and his Prayers, the Animadverter is more excusable, having doubtless writ his Pamphlet without practising any of these Fanati­cal Superstitions, as neither was it requisite; But if he had, 'twas such an answer to his Prayers as never before came from Heaven. The Animadverter is proof against all such Exorcismes and although our Saviour prescribed these remedies against the most obstinate Devils, this man it seems is possessed with a superiour spirit which is not to be cast out, no not by Prayer and Fasting, but sets them at defiance.

Nor had the Animadverter, when he considered himself, less reason to blame the Author for deliberating so long before he published his Book, and for doing it, then with so much Modesty. These are Crimes of which the Animadverter will never be suspected or accused by any man at least they will do him very much wrong, but however it will be impossible ever to convict him of them. But to word it too so superciliously! This has been the Travel of his mind, since he had these thoughts, which he has been humbly conceiving these two years; time en­ough for an Elephant to bring forth in. Why there is, 'tis true, a winged sort of Elephant, hath a peculiar Trunk too like the other, is not so docile and good-natured; but impudent flying in every mans face, and sanguinary thirsting alwayes after blood, and as if it were some con­siderable Wild-Beast, makes a terrible Buzze; but in conclusion 'tis a pitiful, giddy, blind, troublesome Insect, ingendered in a nights time in every Marish, can but run a Pore thorow and give a skinne-wound, and the least touch of a mans finger will crush it. In the Naked Truth it is but a Gnat: and such is the Animadverter compared with the Author.

But in this next Paragraph the Animadverter seems to have out­shot himself, that not content with having passed his own Ecclesi­astical Censure upon the Author, he forges too in his mind a sentence of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament: who, he believes and 'tis probable, would have doom'd the Book to be burnt by the Hang-man. In this he hath meddled beyond his last: but it is some mens property: yet neither is it so likely they would have done it, at the same time when they were about passing an Act for the easing all Protestant dissenters from Penalties, had he vouch'd for the Convo­cation, [Page 8] his Belief, or his probability might have been of more value.

But what has he to do, (yet they have a singular itch to it) with Par­liament business: or how can so thin a scull comprehend or divine the results of the Wisdom of the Nation? Unless he can, as in the Epilogue.

And, instead of Sir Fopling Flutter, he Mr. Smirke.

Who knows indeed but he may, by some new and extraordinary Writ, have been summon'd upon the Emergency of this Book, to Re­present in his peculiar person the whole Representative? Yet by his leave, though he be so, he ought not to Undertake before he be Assem­bled. I know indeed he may have had some late Precedents for it, and for some years continuance, from men too of his own Profession. And if therefore he should Undertake, and to give a good Tax for it, Yet what security can he have himself, but that there may rise such a Contest between the Lords and Commons within him, that, before they can agree about this Judicial Proceeding against the Book, it may be thought fit to Prorogue him.

The Crimes indeed are hainous, and if the Man and Book be guilty, may when time comes, furnish special matter for an Impeachment. That he has made a breach upon their Glorious Act of Unniformity, Vio­lated their Act, their most necessary Act (the Animadverter hath reason by this time to say so) against Printing without a License: and I suppose he reserves anotherfor aggravation in due time; the Act against seditious Conventicles. For these three are all of a piece, and yet are the seve­ral Pieces of the Animadverters Armour: and are indeed no less, nor no more then necessary: For considering how empty of late the Church Magazines have been of that Spiritual Armour, which the Apostle found sufficient against the assaults of whatsoever enemy, even of Satan; what could men in all humane reason do less, then to fur­nish such of the Clergy as wanted, with these Weapons of another Warfare? But, although these Acts were the true effects of the Pru­dence and Piety of that season, yet it is possible (but who can provide for all cases?) that, if there have not already, there may arise thereby in a short time some notable inconvenience. For suppose that Truth should one day or other come to be Truth and every man a Lyer, (I mean of the humor of this Parliamentum Indoctum, this single Represen­tativer, this Animadverter) you see there is no more to be said, as the Case stands at present, but Executioner do your Office. Nor therefore can it ever enter into my mind, as to that Act particularly of Printing, that the Law-givers could thereby intend to allow any man a promis­cuous Licenciousness, and Monopoly of Printing Pernicious Discourses, [Page 9] tending to sow and increase dissension thorow the Land (of which there is but too large a crop already;) as neither of Prohibiting Books dictated by Christian meekness and charity for the promoting of Truth and Peace among us, and reconciling our Differences; no nor even of such as are writ to take out the Blots of Printing-Inke, and wipe off the Aspersions which divers of the Licensed Clergy cast upon mens private Reputations: and yet this is the use to which the Law is som­times applyed. And this Animadverter, who could never have any ra­tional confidence or pretence to the Press or Print, but by an unlucky English saying men have, or by the Text-Letters of his Imprimatur, arraignes this worthy Author for Printing without Allowance, as if it were a sin against the Eleventh Commandment. Though a Samaritan perhaps may not practise Physick without a Licence, yet must a Priest and a Levite alwayes pass by on the other side and if one of them, in an Age, pour Oyle and Wine into the Wounds of our Church (instead of Tearing them Wider,) must he be Cited for it into the Spiritual Court and incurre all Penalties? This high Charge made me the more curious to inquire particularly how that Book The Naked Truth was published, which the Animadverter himself pretends to have got a sight of with some difficulty. And I am credibly informed that the Au­thor caused four hundred of them and no more to be Printed against the last Session but one of Parliament. For nothing is more usual then to Print and present to them Proposals of Revenue, Matters of Trade, or any thing of Publick Convenience; and sometimes Cases and Petitions, and this, which the Animadverter calls the Authors Dedication, is his humble Petition to the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament: And understanding the Parliament inclined to a Temper in Reli­gion, he prepar'd these for the Speakers of both Houses and as many of the Members as those could furnish. But that, the Parlia­ment rising just as the Book was delivering out and before it could be presented, the Author gave speedy order to suppress it till ano­ther Session. Some covetous Printer in the mean time getting a Copy, surreptitioufly Reprinted it, and so it flew abroad without the Authors knowledge, and against his direction. So that it was not his, but the Printers fault to have put so great an obligation upon the publick. Yet because the Author has in his own Copyes, out of his unspeakable Tenderness and Modesty begg'd pardon of the Lords and Commons, in his Petition, for transgressing their Act against Printing without a Licence, this Indoctum Parliamentum mistaking the Petition as addressed to himself, will not grant it, but insults over the Author and upbraids him the rather as a desperate offender, that sins on he saith, goes on still in his wickedness, and hath done it against his own Consci­ence. Now truly if this were a sin, it was a sin of the first Impression. [Page 10] And the Author appears so constant to the Church of England, and to its Liturgy in particular, that, having confessed four hundred times with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart, I doubt not but in assisting at Divine Service he hath frequently since that received Abso­lution. It is something strange that to publish a good Book is a sin, and an ill one a vertue; and that while one comes out with Authority; the other may not have a Dispensation. So that we seem to have got an Expurgatory Press, though not an Index, and the most Religious Truth must be expung'd and suppressed in order to the false and secular interest of some of the Clergy. So much wiser are they grown by pro­cess of time then the Obsolete Apostle that said, We can do nothing against the Truth. But this hath been of late years the practice of these single Representers of the Church of England, to render those Pecca­dillioes against God as few and inconsiderable as may be, but to make the sins against themselves as many as possible, and these to be all hain­ous and unpardonable. In so much that if we of the Laity would but study our Self-Preservation, and learn of them to be as true to our separate interest as these men are to theirs, we ought not to wish them any new Power for the future, but after very mature deliberation. Forasmuch as every such Act does but serve, as some of them use it, to make the good people of England walk in peril of their Souls, to multiply sin and abomination thorow the Land, and by ingaging mens minds under spiritual Bondage, to lead them Canonically on into Tem­poral slavery. Whereas the Laity are commonly more temperate and merciful (I might say more discreet) in the exercising of any Authority they are intrusted with, and what Power they have, they will not wear it thred bare: so that if I were to commit a fault for my life, (as suppose by Printing this without a License) I would chuse to sin against good Mr. Oldenburg.

But this Animadverter is the genuine example of Ecclesiastical Cle­mency, who proceeding on cannot bear that the Author should use the Title of an Humble Moderator (he thinks him sure guilty herein Lasae Majestatis Ecclesiasticae, and that both these Qualities are incompatible with one of their Coat, and below the Dignity of any man of the Facul­ty) much less will he indure him when he comes, in the following discourse, to justify his Claime to that Title, by letting his Moderation according to the Apostles precept, be known to all men, for the Lord is at hand. But he saith that the Author Assumes, Imposes, and Turnes all upside down, and witnesses an Immoderate Zeal for one (that is the Non-Conformists) Party: then which the Animadverter could never have invented a more notorious, studied, and deliberate Falshood, to pre­possesse and mislead the gentle Reader: Wherein does he Assume? He speaks like a Man, a Creature to which Modesty and Reason are pecu­liar; [Page 11] not like an Animadverter, that is an Animal which hath nothing Humane in it but a Malicious Grinne, that may Provoke indeed, but cannot Imitate so much as Laughter. Wherein does he Impose? In no­thing but by declaring his Opinion against all unreasonable Impositi­on? And though it appears natural to him to speak with Gravity, yet he usurps not any Authority further, then as any man who speaks of a Truth which he thorowly understands, cannot with all his Modesty and Humility hinder others from paying a due Reverence to his Person and acquiescing in his Doctrine. But wherein does he Turn all upside down? This hath been a common Topick of Ecclesiastical Accusation. Our Saviour was accused that he would Destroy the Temple. The first Martyr Ste­ven was stoned as a Complice. And Saint Paul (as ill luck would have it) was made odious upon the same Crimination of the Animadverters, Acts 17. v. 5, 6. For, certain Lewd-fellows of the baser sort, set all the City in an uproar, crying those that have turned the world Up-side-down are come hither also. And yet notwithstanding all these Calumnies, The Naked Truth, Christianity, hath made a shift, God bethanked, to con­tinue till this day: and there will never want those that bear testimony to it, even to the Primitive Christianity, maugre all the arts that the men of Religion can contrive to misrepresent and discountenance it. But as for the Turning all up-side-down, the Animadverter is somewhat in­nocent, if by the defect of his Organt, as it fares with those whose Brain turnes round, ('So we vulgarly expresse it) he have imagined that the world is tumbling headlong with him. But as to the Preju­dice, which he therefore reserved as the most effectual and taking to undoe the Author by, that he is Immoderately Zealous for the Non-Con­formists; it is the effect of as strong a Phancy, or as Malicious an Inten­tion as the Former; it being scarce possible to open the Book in any place without chancing upon some passage where he makes a firm Pro­fession, or gives a clear proof of his real submission and Addiction to the Church of England: all his fault for ought I see being, that he is more Truly and Cordially concerned for our Church then some mens Igno­rance is capable of, or their corrupt interest can comply with. But therefore whoever were the adviser it is not well done to use him in this dirty manner. There is no prudence in it, nor whereas the Author, in excuse that he sets not his name, saith it is, because he is a man of great Passions, and not able to bear a Reproach (The Animadverter had done fairer to cite the whole, or Commendations: my small Ability puts me out of danger of the last, but in great fear of the former.) Therefore to resolve thus (whereas they might have undone him you see by Com­mendation) the rather to Reproach him, now they have learn't his Feeble Holy Church, I can tell you hath suffered upon that account so of ten that it were time for her to be wiser. For by exasperating [Page 12] men of Parts, who out of an ingenious love of Truth have temperatly Writ against some abuses, She hath added Provocation to mens Wit to look still further; insomuch that at last it hath sometimes produced (then which nothing can be more dangerous to the Church) a Refor­mation. Therefore, though Christ hath commanded his Followers (so it be not I suppose out of his Way) that if any man press them to go one mile, they should go two; yet it is not wisdom in the Church to pretend to, or however to exercise, that Power of Angariating men fur­ther then their occasions or understandings will permit. If a man can­not go their Length 'tis better to have his company in quiet as far as his Road lyes. For my part I take the Church of England to be very happy in having a Person of his Learning and Piety so far to comply with Her; and, if my advice might be taken, She should not lose one inch more of him by handling him irreverently. For if once She should totally lose him, God knows what an Instrument he might prove, and how much good he might do in the Nation, more then he ever yet thought of. What a shame it is to hear the Animadverter abuse him (who by the very Character of his Stile appears no Vulgar Person, and by how much he hath more of Truth, hath more of Gods Image, and should therefore have imprinted that Awe upon him that Man hath over most Brutes:) he to trifle with so worthy a person at that rate, that one would not use the meanest Varlet, the dullest School-boy, the rankest Idiot, no nor the veryest Animadverter! However he saith, the Au­thor hath done himself and him the Animadverter a great favour, by con­cealing his Name, in making it impossible for him to reflect upon his Person (otherwise it seems he should have had it home) which he knows no more then the Man in the Moon. But therefore I am the rather jealous he did know him: for the Animadverter having a Team of Gnaz'as alwayes a his devotion, and being able if any one tired by the way to relieve it and draw in person, never think that he would want intelligence in that Region. Come 'twas all but an affected ignorance in the Animad­verter, and he had both inquired and heard as much as any of us who was the probable Author: and all the Guard that he Lyes upon is, be­cause the Author had not given him legal notice that he Writ it. And this was even as the Animadverter would have wished it. For if a Reve­rend Person had openly avowed it, he could not have been sawcy with so gooda Grace: But under the pretence of not knowing, Sir, that it was you, but only, Sir, as you were the Patron of so vile a Cause, many a dry bob, close gird, and privy nip has he given him. Yet he saith, the Author would have done well, and a piece of Justice to have named himself, so to have cleared others: for it hath been confidently layed to the charge of more then one Reverend Person (how slily!) who (I have great reason to be­lieve, and am several ways assured) had no hand in it. Truly the Animad­verter [Page 13] too would have done a piece of Justice to have named himself; for there has been more then one Witty person traduced for his Pamphlet, and I believe by this time he would take it for a great favour if any man would be such a Fool as own it for him. For he very securely reproaches the Author, and yet I have been seeking all over for the Animadverters name, and cannot find it. Not withstanding that he writes forsooth in desence of the Church of England; and against so vile a Cause, as he stiles it, and under the Publick Patronage. Which is most disingenuously done, as on other accounts, so in respect of my Lord Bishop of London, whom he has left in the lurch to justify ano­ther mans Follyes with his Authority. But however that venerable Per­son, who has for Learning, Candor, and Piety, as he does for Dignity also, outstripp'd his Age and his Fellows, have been drawn in to License what certainly he cannot approve of, it was but his First Fruits, and a piece of early liberality, as is usual, upon his new Promotion, and I am given to understand that, for the Animadverters sake, it is like to be the last that he will allow of that nature. But this is not only a Trick of the Animadverters, but ordinary with many others of them, who while we write at our own peril, and perhaps set our names to it, (for I am not yet resolved whether I can bear Reproach or Commendation) they that raile for the Church of England, and under the Publick License and Protection, yet leave men, as if it were at Hot-Cockles to guesse blind-fold who it is that hit them. But it is possible that some of these too may lie down in their turnes. What should be the reason of it? sure theirs is not so Vile a Cause too that they dare not abide by it. Or are they the Writers conscious to themselves that they are such Things as ought not once to be Named among Christians? Or is it their own sorry performance that makes them ashamed to avow their own Books? Or is there some secret force upon them that obliges them to say things against their Conscience? Or would they reserve a Latitude to themselves to turn Non-Conformists again upon occasion? Or do they in pure honesty abstaine from putting a single Name to a Book, which hath been the workmanship of the whole Diocess?

But though he know not his Name, seeing he has vented his own Amusements to the Churches great and real prejudice he saith, (and that is this Case) he must not think to scape for the Godliness of his Stile: Impious and most unmerciful! Poor David was often in this Case. Psal. 22. They gaped upon him with their Mouth. He trusted, said they, in the Lord that he would deliver him, let him deliver him seeing he delighted in him. And Psal. 71. 11. Persecute and take him, there is none to deliver him. And yet there are many places too in Scripture, where God spared men even for their outward Formalities, and their Hypocrisie served to delay his Judgements; and should he not still do so, the Church might re­receive [Page 14] greater prejudice. But the Church, and God are two things, and are not it seems oblidged to the same Measures: insomuch that even the sincerity of one Person, which might perhaps attone for a whole Order and render them acceptable both to God and Man, yet cannot hope for his own pardon.

Neither must be think to scope for a Man of good Intentions: yet sure he is, else would not give the Devil so much more then his due, saying he would never condemne any good action though done by the Devil, As if saith the Animadverter, be supposed the Devil might do some such. Here he thinhs he has a shrewd hit at him, and this if a man had leisure might beget a Metaphysical Controversy: but I desire him rather to comment on that Text: Doest thou Believe? thou doest well, the Devils also Believe and Tremble. Whereas he goeth on to mock at the Authors Good Intentions, and tells him pleasantly that, Hell it self is full of such as were once full of Good Intenti­ons: 'tis a Concluding piece of Wit, and therefore, as well as for the Rarity, should be civilly treated and incouraged; so that I shall use no further [...] there, that if this be the qualification of such as go to Hell, the Animadverter hath secured himself from coming there and so many more as were his Partners. And thus much I have said upon his Ani­madversions on the Title, &c. Wherein, he having misrepresented the Author and prejudicated the Reader against him by all disingenuous methods, and open'd the whole Pedlers-pack of his malice, which he half-p—worths out in the following discourse to his petty Chapmen, I could not properly say less, though it exceeds perhaps the number of his Pages. For it is scarce credible how vuluminous and pithy he is in extravagance: and one of his sides in Quarto, for Falshood, Insolence, and Absurdity contains a Book in Folio. Besides, the Reader may please to consider how much labour it costs to Bray even a Little Thing in a Mortar: and that Calumny is like London-dirt, with which though a man may be spatter'd in an instant, yet it requires much time, pains, and Fullers-earth to scoure it out again.

Annotations upon the Animadversions on the first Chapter, concerning Articles of Faith.

THe Play begins. I Confess (Do so then and make no more words) when first I saw this Jewel of a Pamphlet, and had run over two or three pages of this Chapter, I suspected the Author for some Youngster that had been Dabbling amongst the Socinian Writers, and was ambitious of [Page 15] showing us his Talent in their way. I was quickly delivered from this Jealousy, by his Orthodox Contradictory expressions in other places. That word Jewel is commonly used in a good sense, and I know no reason why this Book of the Authors might not be properly enough called so, though the Animadverter hath debased the meaning of the word to deprave and undervalue the worth of the Treatise. For I perceive that, during his Chaplainship, he hath learnt it in conversation with the Ladies, who translate it frequently to call Whore in a more civil and refined signification. But to say thus, that he suspected him at first for a Socinian, yet was quickly cured of his Jealousy, because he found the Author was Honest and Orthodox. Why should he vent his own Amuse­ments thus to the great and real prejudice of any worthy person? It is indeed a piece of second Ingenuity for a man, that invents and suggests a Calumny of which he is sure to be convict in the instant, therefore with the same breath to disclaim it: but it manifests in the mean time how well he was inclined if he thought it would have pass'd upon the Author; and that could the Animadverter have secured his Reputation, he would have adventured the Falshood. What would he not have given to have made the world believe that he was a Socinian! In this beginning you have a right Pattern of the Animadverters whole Stuffe, and may see what Measure the Author is to expect all thorow.

But he finds, he faith, that he is one of the Men of the second Rate, (as he takes leave to stile them) that scarce ever see to the second Conseqnence. At first I suspected from this expression that the Animadverter had been some Ship-Chaplain, that had been Dabbling in the Sea-Contro­versies, a Tarpawlin of the Faculty: but I was quickly delivered from this Jealousy by his Magisterial Contradictions, that shew him to be a man of more Consequence, one of them whose Eccleastical Dignities yet can­not wean them from a certain hankering after the Wit of the Laity, and applying it as their own upon (or 'tis no great matter though it be without) occasion. Yet therefore once for all he Protests, too, that he does not charge him with any of his own most obvious Consequences as his Opinions (for who would believe the one or other that reads the Author?) for 'tis plaine that he does not (nor any man that hath Eyes) discerne them. This is a Candor pregnant with Contempt. But in the mean time he thinks it ingenuous to load this second Rate Frigat, (that was fitted out for the Kings and the Nations service) so deep that she can scarce swim, with a whole Cargo of Consequences which are none of the Authors, but will, upon search, be all found the Animadverters proper goods and Trade, his own Inconsequences and Inanimadver­sions. So men with vicious Eyes see Spiders weave from the Brim of their own Beavers.

As for example. p. 1. He saith that this Chapter does admirably serve [Page 16] the turn of the rankest Sectarian. That in his two or three first pages he appear­ed a Socinian. p. 12. That his Pique at the new word Homoousios carryes such an ugly reflection upon the Nicene Creed, that be, the Animadverter, scarse dares understand him. p. 6. The Author speaking against introdu­cing new Articles of Faith, the Adversary tells him; he hopes he does not mean all our Thirty Nine Articles; and defends them as if they were at­taqued. That he does implicitly condemne the whole Catholick Church both East and West for being so presumptuous in her Definitions. p. 9. That upon his Principles the Prime and most necessary Articles of Faith will be in danger. The old dormant Heresies, Monothelites, Nestorians, &c. May safely revive again. p. 13. That his are the very Dreggs of Mr. Hobbs his Divinity, and worse, p. 14. That he would have some men live like Pagans and go to no Church at all, p. 16. So for ought we know this Au­thor is a Jesuite, and writes this Pamphlet only to embroile us Protestants. p. 25, That he is guilty of unthought, of Popery. p. 33. That our Author like her (the foolish woman) in the Proverbs, plucks down our Church with his own hands and that she had need therefore be upheld against such as he is. Of these Inferences which, not being natural, must have re­quired some labour, he is all along very liberal to the Author; but the vile and insolent language costs him nothing, so that he lays that on prodigally and without all reason. Now whether a man that holds a true Opinion, or he that thus deduces ill Consequences from it, be the more blame-worthy, will prove to be the Case between the Animad­verter and the Author. And (to shew him now from whence he bor­rowed his Wit of the second Rate, and at the second Hand)

But he saith, because of these things, the Mischief being done, to un­doe the Charme again it is become a Duty to Expose him. Alas what are they going to do with the poor man? What kind of death is this Ex­posing? But sure, considering the Executioner, it must be some Learned sort of Cruelty. Is it the Taeda, in which they candled a Man over in Wax, and he instead of the wick, burnt out to his lives end like a Taper, to give light to the Company? Or is it the Scapha, wherein a man, being stripp'd Naked and Smear'd with Honey, was in the scorching Sun abandon'd to be stung and Nibbled by Wasps; Hornets, and all troublesome Insects till he expired? Or is it rather ad Bestias, turning him out unarmed to be bated, worryed, and devour'd, by the wild Beasts in the Theatre? For in the Primitive Times there were these and an hundred laudable ways more to Expose Christians; and the Ani­madverter seems to have studied them. But the Crime being of Sorce­ry, and that there is a Charm which hath wrought great Mischief and [Page 17] it not to be undone but by Exposing the Malefactor (Charme he never so wisely) 'tis more probable that it may be the Punishment usual in such Cases. And indeed the Animadverter hath many times in the day such Fits tale him, wherein he is lifted up in the Aire that six men cannot hold him down, teares, raves, and foams at the mouth, casts up all kind of trash, somtimes speakes Greek and Latine, that no man but would swear he is bewitched: and this never happens but when the Author appeares to him. And though in his Animadversions on the Title &c. He hath so often scratched and got blood of him (the infallible Country Cure) yet he still finds no ease by it, but is rather more tormented. So that in earnest I begin to suspect him for a Witch, or however, having writ the Naked Truth, 'tis manifest he is a Sooth-sayer, that's as bad. Many persons besides have for tryal run needless up to the Eye in several remarkable places of his Naked Truth, that look like moles or warts upon his body, and yet he, though they prick never so much, feels no­thing. Nay some others of the Clergy, whereof one was a Bishop, have tyed him hand and foot and thrown him into the Thames betwixt White-hall and Lambeth, for experiment; laying so much weight too on him as would sink any ordinary man, and nevertheless he swims still and keeps above Water. So dangerous is it to have got an Ill Name once, either for speaking Truth or for Incantation, that it comes to the same thing almost to be Innocent or Guilty: for if a man swim he is Guilty, and to be Burnt; if he sinke, he is Drowned, and Innocent. But there­fore this Exposing must surely be to condemne the Author, as he has done his Book already, to the Fire, (for no man stands fairer for't as being first Heretick, and now Witch by Consequence) and then the Devil sure can have no more power over the Animadverter. Yet when I consider'd better that he does not accuse him of any harme that he has suffered by him in person, but that it is the Church which may justly Complain of him, and having done her so much mischiefe, therefore it is become a Duty to Ex­pose him, I could not but imagine that it must be a severer Torment. For if our Church be bewitched, and he has done it,

Though I never heard before of a Church that was Bewitched except that of the Galatians, Gal. 3. 1. Whom Saint Paul asks O foolish Galatians who hath Bewitched you? taking it for evident that they were so, because (they are his very next words) they did not obey the Truth. (And that was a Naked Truth with a Witness, the Apostle teaching, that Christ is become of none effect to them, that from their Christian Liberty returned to the Jewish Ceremonies. Gal. 5. 4.) But therefore I looked over the Canons, the Rational, the Ceremonial, the Rubrick, imagining the Exposing mention'd, [Page 18] must be some new part of our Ecclesiastical Discipline, that I had not taken notice of before, and I should find it in one or other of the Offices. But I lost my labour, and 'twas but just I should, for being so simple, as not to understand at first that to Expose a man, is to write Animadversions upon him. For that is a crueller Torment then all the Ten Persecutors (and which none but this Clergy-man, could have) invented. To be set in the Pillary first, and bedawb'd with so many Ad­dle Eggs of the Animadverters own Cakle as he pa [...]ts him with! How miserable then is the man that must suffer afterwards, sub [...] le [...]to Ingenio! To be raked and harrowed thorow with so [...]usty a Saw! So dull a Torture that it contains all other in it, and which even the Christian Reader is scarce able to indure with all his Patience! Had he been a man of some accuteness, the pain would have been over in an instant: but this was the utmost inhumanity in whoever it was that advised (where­as several witty men, were proposed that would have been glad of the the imployment) to chuse out on purpose the veryest (Animadverter) in all the Faculty. This it is to which the Author is condemned. And now that I know it, and that it is an Office a Duty to which our Church it seems has advanc'd the Animadvertur; I wish him Joy of his new Preferment, and shall henceforward take notice of him as the Church of Englands's Exposer, for I can never admit him by any Analogy to be an Exposito [...].

It is no less disingenuously, then constantly done of the Exposer in this same; p. 1. To concern the Author in the Non-Conformists, that may have reflected any where, as if there were Socinian, or Pelagian Doctrines; Allowed to be preached and maintained in the City Pulpits. For the Author hath not in his whole Book the least syllable that can be wrested to any such purpose. Only it serves the Adversaries turn, as he thinks, to preingage the whole Clergy and Church of England against him, if they were so simple, and by giving him an odious Badge and jumbling them altogether, to involve him in all the prejudices which are studioufly advanced against that party. But neither have I any thing to urge of that nature further then, because he will out of season mention these matters, to observe that our Church seems too remiss in the Case of Socinus and Volkelius, who had many things to great value stolen from them by a late Plagiary, but as yet have not obtained any Justice or Restitution.

But seeing the Exposer is thus given to transforme not only the Au­thor, but his words and his meaning; it is requisite to state this Chap­ter in his own Terms: as men set their Arms on their Plate, to prevent the nimbleness of such as would alter the property. The sum of what he humbly proposes is: That nothing hath caused more mischief in the Church, then the establishing New and Many Articles of Faith, and requiring men to [Page 19] assent [...] them with Divine Faith. For the imposing such on Dissenters, hath caused furious Wars and lamentable Blood-shed among Christians. That it is irrational to promote the Truth of the Gospel by Imposition, which is con­trary to the Laws of the Gospel, and break an evident Commandment to establish a doubtful Truth. For if such Articles be not fully expressed in Scrip­ture w [...]ds, it is Doubtful to him upon whom it is Forced, though not to the the Imposer. If it be fully expressed in Scripture Words, there needs no new Articles: but if not so, and that it be only Deduced from Scripture Expres­sions, then men that are as able and knowing as the Imposer, may think it is not clearly Deduced from Scripture. But there is nothing more Fully Exprest, or that can be more clearly Deduced from Scripture, nor more suitable to Na­tural Reason, then that no man should be Forced to Believe. Because no man can Force himself to believe, no not even to believe the Scriptures. But Faith is a work of peculiar Grace and the Gift of God. And if a man Believe what is Clearly Contain'd in Scripture, he needs not believe any thing else with Di­vine Faith. To add to, or deminish from the Scripture, is by it unlawful, and lyable to the Curse in the Revelation. If the Imposer answer, he requires not to Believe it as Scripture, he doth, if he urge it to be believed with Divine Faith. If he say he requires it not to be Believed with Divine Faith, he does, if he make it necessary to Salvation. There is no Command nor Countenance given in the Gospel to use Force to cause men Believe. We have no Compre­hensive Knowledge of the Matters declared in Scripture, that are the Prime and Necessary Articles of Faith, therefore it is not for any man to Declare one Tittle more to be Believed with Divine Faith, then God hath there Declar­ed. He cannot find the least hint in the Word of God to use any Force to Com­pel men to the Churches established Doctrine or Discipline: and from Reason there can be no motive to be Forced beyond their Reason. To attempt any such Force, though to the True Beliefe, is to do Evil that Good may come of it. But the Pastor ought first by plaine and sound Doctrine to stop the Mouths of Gainsayers. When the Ministers have Preached and Prayed, they have done all they can in order to mens Believing, the rest must be left to the Justice or Mercy of God. But if turbulent spirits broach New Doctrines, Contrary to Scripture, or not Clearly Contained in the Gospel, and neither by Admoniti­ons nor Intreaties will be stopt, the Pastors may proceed to the Exeroise of the Keys. Which if it were duely performed as in the Primitive Times, and not by Lay Chancellors and their surrogates, would be of great effect. The Magi­strate ought to sili [...]ce and oppose such at preach what is Contrary to or not Clearly Contained in the Gospel, and if they persevere in their perversuess, he may use his power with Christian Moderation. For his power reaches to Punish Evil Doers, who Publi [...] or Practise somthing to subvert the Fundamentals of Religion, or to Disturbe the Peace of the State, or to Injure their Neighbours: but not to Punish Evil Believers. But if the Magistrate shall conceive he hath [Page 20] power also to punish Evil Believers, and on that pretence shall punish. True Believers, the Subject is bound to submit and b [...]ar it, to the loss of Goods, Li­berty or Life. The Reader will excuse this one long Quotation, for it will much shorten all that followes.

But now for which of these is it that 'tis become a Duty to Expose him? What is there here that seems not, at first sight, very Christian, very Rational? But however, it is all delivered in so Grave and In­offensive manner, that there was no temptation to alter the stile into Ridicule, and Satyre. But like some Carle, the Animadverter, may browze upon the Leaves, or Peel the Barke, but he has not teeth for the Solid, nor can hurt the Tree but by accident. Yet a man that sees not into the second, but the Thirteenth Consequence that is one of the Disputers of this World, and ought to be admitted to these Doubtfull Disputa­tions (from which he ironically by St. Pauls rule forsooth excludes the Author) what is there that such an one, so subtile so piercing, cannot distingish upon and Controvert? Truth it self ought to sacrifice to him that he would be propitious. For if he appear on the other side, it will go against her unavoidably.

In his 27. P. he is ravisht in Contemplation how Rarachose it is, to see or hear a material Question in Theology defended in the University-Schools, where one stands a Respondent, enclos'd within the Compass of his Pen, as Popilius the Roman Embassador, made a Circle with his Wand about Antiochus, and bid him give him a determinate answer before he went out of it; a most apt and learned resemblance, and which shews the Gentle­mans good reading! But it is, I confess a noble spectacle, and worthy of that Theater which the munificence of the present Arch-Bishop of Canterbury hath dedicated in one (may it be too in the other) of our Universities; where no Apish Scaramuccio, no Scenical Farces, no Combat of Wild-Beasts among themselves, or with men condemn'd, is presented to the People; but the modest Skirmish of Reason, and which is usually perform'd so well that it turns to their great honour, and of our whole Nation. Provided the Chaire be well filled, with an Orthodox Professor, and who does not by Solaecismes in Latine, or mistake of the Argument, or Question, render the thing ridiculous to the By-standers. That the Pew be no less fitted with a Respondent, able to sustaine and answer in all points the expectation of so Learned an Auditory: That the Opponent likewise exceed not the terms of Civili­ty, nor Cavil where he should Argue; and that the Questions debated be so discreetly chosen; as there may be no danger, by Controverting the Truth, to unsettle the minds of the Youth ever after, and innure them to a Disputable Notion about the most weighty points of our Re-Religon; by which sort of subtilizing the Church hath in former Ages much suffered, nor hath Ours in the Latter wholly escaped. [Page 21] Now, seeing the Exposer seem [...] to delight so much (as men use in what they excell) in this Exercise, he and I, because we cannot have the con­veniency of the Schools and Pew, will play as well as we can in Paper, at this new Game of Antiochus and (Popilius. I must for this time be the Roman Senator, and he the Monarch of Asia [...] for by the Rules of the Play, he always that hath writ the last Book is to be Antiochus, until the other has done replying. And I hope to gird him up to close with [...] in his Circle, that he shall appear very slender. For I am sensible, yet could not avoid it, how much of the Readers and mine own time I have run out in examining his Levity; but now I am glad to see my labour shorten: for, having thus plumed him of that puffe of Feathers, with which he buoy'd himself up in the Aire, and flew over our heads, it will, almost by the first Consequence, be manifest in his Argument, how little a Soul it is, and Body, that henceforward I am to deal with.

The Author having said that, That which we commonly call the Apostles Creed, is, and was so received by the Primitive Church, as the sum Total of Christian Faith, necessary to Salvation. Why not now? Is the state of Salva­tion alter'd? If it be Compleat, what need other Articles? The Exposer p. 2. answers. There may have been needful heretofore, not only other Articles, but other Creeds for the further Explication of these Articles in the Apostles Creed: and yet in those New Creeds not one New Article. 'Tis safely and cauti­ously said, there May, and not there Were other Articles and other Creeds needful. But the whole Clause besides is so drawn up, as if he affected the Academical glory of justifying a Paradox: nor is it for the reputation of such Creeds, whatever they be, to be maintained by the like Methods. But seeing he disdains to explicare further, how there can be a New Creed, and yet not one New Article; I will pres [...] to understand him, and then say, that in such Creeds, whatsoever Ar­ticle does either explaine the Apostles Creed Contrary to, or Beside the Scripture, or does not containe the same Express Scriptural Authority (which only makes this that is called the Apostles Creed to be Authen­tick) that is a New Article to every man that cannot conceive the ne­cessary Deduction. But then he galls the Author. The Apostles Creed is the sum of the Christian Faith True. Yet I hope he will not think the Nicene, the Constantinopolitan, and the Athanasian) Creed Superfluous and and unnecessary. First, it is not necessary to take all those Three in the Lump, as the Exposer puts it: for perhaps a man may think but one, or but two of them to have been superfluous, and unnecessary. Next it is an hard thing for the Exposer, who ought rather to have proved that they were necessary to shift it back thus upon the Author. I have not spoke with him, nor know whether I shall as long as I live, (though I should be glad of the opportunity,) to know his mind. But suppose he should think them, One, Two, or Three Unnecessary, who can help [Page 22] it? But so much I think, upon the State or sum of this Controversie in his own [...], I may adventure for him; that [...] Confessions of Faith he does not disapprove them, (taking it granted there is nothing in any of them flatly against the Word of God) but that if any thing be there­in drawn up in such or such an exact Forme of Words, not Expressed in Scripture, and required to be Believed with Divine Faith, as necessary to a Mans own Salvation, and without Believing which he must De­clare too that no Man else can be saved that this is Dangerous, and the imposing of it is Unwarrantable by Reason or Scripture, He adds in this same Paragraph, that the Authors Censure upon Constantine is so bold and upon some Godly Bishops, (whom he conceives more Zealous then Discreet, and so do some Godly Bishops conceive of this Author) and his Pique at the New Word Homoousios carryes such as ugly reflection upon the Creed, that he scarce [...] understand him, And I on the other side take his Fears and his Hopes to be alike inconsiderable. His words are p. 6. I am confi­dent had the most prudent and pius Constantine, the First and Best of Christian Emperours pursued his own intention, to suppress all Disputes, and all new Questions about God the Son, both Homoousian, and Homoiousian, and commanded all to acquiesce in the very Scripture Expressions, without any ad­dition, that the Arrian Heresie had soon expired. I note that the Exposer very disingenuously, and to make it look more ugly, take not the least notice of his Pique against [...] too and the Arrian Heresie. But what is there here to fright the understanding Animadverter out of his Wits, or what to make some Godly Bishops (who it seems must be numberless or nameless) to conceive the Author [...] Zealous then Discreet? But for this Censure of the Author, as well as for the Godliness of the Bishops, we must acquiesce it seems upon the Credit, or Gratitude of one Nameless Exposer.

He then blames the Author p. 3. for saying p. 1. that he would have men improve in Faith rather Intensive, then Extensive, to confirm it, ra­ther then enlarge it. Still and alwayes, to make things a little more ug­ly and of less value, he clips the Authors good English. You would have men improve in Faith, so would I, but rather Intensive then Extensive. 'Tis good to know all Gospel Truths, no doubt of that, the more the better still; but the Question is not what is Good, but what is Necessary. This is a pious and undonbred Truth and confirm'd by the Author out of several Places of Scripture: May I add one Marke the 9. 17. Where one brought his Son, being troubled with a Dumb Spirit to our Saviour. v. 23. Jesus saith to the Father, if thou canst Believe, all things are possible to him that Believeth. The Father coyes out with tears, Lord I Believe, strengthen thou my Unbeliefe. And this Confession of the Intensive Truth of his Faith, with his rely­ance upon Christ for the strengthening of it, was sufficient to coope­rate with our Saviour toward a Miracle, and throwing that Dumb and [Page 23] Deaf Spirit out of a third Person. Whoever indeed will deny this Truth, must go against the whole current of the New Testament. But the Ex­poser is Deaf to that, 'tis all one to him. Yet he is not Dumb, though as good he had, for all he has to say to it is: And yet it is certaine that all formal and mortal Hereticks, that are not Atheists, are justly condemn'd for want of due extension in their Faith. What pertinence! But there goes more Faith I see to the ejecting of a Talkative then of a Dumb Spirit. There is no need of further answer to so succinct a Bob, then that it had been well those terms of Formal, and Mortal, and Hereticks, and no less that of Condemned had in this place been thorowly explained. For we know that there was a time when the Protestants themselves were the Format, and, to be sure, the Mortal Hereticks, even here in England, and for that very crime too, For want of due extention in their Faith, they were Con­demned, whether justly or no it is in the Exposers power to determine. For some of our Ruling Clergy, who yet would be content to be ac­counted good Protestants, are so loath to part with any hank they have got, at what time soever, over the poor Laity, or what other reason, that the Writ de Haeretico Comburendo, though desired to be abolish'd, is still kept in force to this day. So that it is of more concernment then one would at first think, how far mens Faith (least afterwards for Be­lieving short their Persons and Estates) be Extended, or taken in Execu­tion.

He proceeds page the 3. and several that follow, to quarel the Author for quoting to this purpose Acts 8. and then saying: I pray remember the Treasurer (the Exposer will do it I warrant you, and the Chancellor too, without more intreaty) to Candace Queen of Ethiopia, whom Phi­lip instructed with in the Faith. His time of Catechising was very short and soon proceeded to Baptisme. But Philip first required a Confession of his Faith, and the Eunuch made it, and I beseech you observe it. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and straight way he was Baptized: How, no more then this? No more. This little Grain of Faith, being sound, believed with­all his heart, purchased the Kingdom of Heaven. 'Tis not the Quantity but the Quality of our Faith God requireth. Here the Exposer, pretending now to be a learned Expositor, hopes to win his Spurrs, and layes out all his ability to prove that Philip (in a very short time for so much work as he finds him) had instructed the Treasurer thorow the whole Athanasian Creed; concerning the Equality, Inseparability, Coeternity of the Three Persons in the Trinity. For, saith the Ezposer, the very Forme of Baptisme, if thorowly explained, is a perfect Creed by it self: In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: For it seems the name of the Son, was by a Divine Criticisme interposed between the other two Per­sons, whose Godhead was confest and acknowledged by the Jewish Church, rather then that of the Word, to de [...]te the second Person, &c. I should [Page 24] be glad to know where the Exposer learnt that the Jewish Church ac­knowledged the Godhead of the Holy Ghost, as of a Distinct Person; which if he cannot show, he is very far out in the Matter, as he is in that Expression of Divine Criticisme. Therefore he may do well to Con­sider. But it is simply, to say no worse, done of him, to call that Forme of words as it is ordered by our Saviour himself, a Divine Criticisme, as if Christ had therein affected that Critical glory, which the Exposer himself in so subtile a Remarke doubtless pretends to. But the Exposer will not only have Philip to have instructed the Treasurer in this Criticisme, but to have read him so long a Lecture upon Baptisme, as must for cer­taine have been out of the Assemblies, and not Noel's Catechisme: ac­quainting him and instructing him abundantly, in those great Points of Faith, the Dying, Burying, and Rising again of Christ for our Justification from our sins, together with the Thing signified, Death unto sin, Mortification, the New Birth unto Righteousness, then the Mistery of the First and Second Covenant, Original sin, how thereby he was a Son of Wrath, had hereby For­giveness; of sins, Adoption, being made a Child of Grace, Co-Heire with Christ, to live with him in the Communion of Saints, after the Resurrection, in Life Everlasting; I am glad to see that, at least when it serves to his purpose, this Exposer will own all the Doctrines, which another Expo­ser would have call'd so many Stages of Regeneration, and have thought them too many to have drove over in one dayes journey, but would ra­ther have turn'd out of the Road, and lay'd short all night somewhere by the way. Here is a whole Calvinistical Systeme of Divinity, that, if the Treasurer had been to be Baptized in the Lake of Geneva, more could not have been expected. And he has in a trice made him so perfect in it, that, as soon as the Christ'ning was over, he must have been fit to be received not only ad Communionem Laecam, but the Clericam also, if it were then come into fashion. These Exposers are notable men, they are as good as Witches, they know all things, and what was done, and what was not done equally. In earnest, he has made us as formal a sto [...]y of all Ppilip said, and the Treasurer believ'd; as if he had sate all the while in the Coock-boot, and knows how long the discourse lasted, as well, as if he had set his Watch when they began, and look'd upon it just as the Spirit caught up Philip to Azotus. But (suppose, for the Ex­posers sake, that the Treasurer) were in a Coach, discourse, and for all the rumbling, so distinctly and thorowly, in so short a time too, if it had been, which is the uttermost, a dayes passage Catechu­meniz'ed) it came to this short Print between them: The Treasurer de­sires to be Baptized, Philip replys; If thou believest with all thine heart thou mayest, which can never signifie otherwise then with all the Inten­tion of our Spirit, as when we are said to love God wi [...]h all our Heart: The Treasurer replyes, and that's all, I believe that Jesus Christ is the [Page 25] Son of God. Now it is worth the Readers observation, that out of a de­sire of C [...]villing and the luxury the Exposer takes in it, he has quite for­got the matter he brought in Controversie. For the Dispute is concern­ing New Creeds, Imposed beyond clear Scripture: the Authors argu­ments and proofs tended wholly thither, and to that purpose he urged this passage of Philip, to prove that God considers both, but rather the Quality, then Quantity of our Faith. The Exposer amuses himself and us, to tell what Philip preach'd to the Treasurer, but never minds that, let that have been as it will, and the Eunuch have believ'd all that this man can imagine, yet all the Creed demanded, and all that he pro­fesses is no more then those formal words, believed with all his heart. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Wherein the Author has clear­ly carryed, and the Exposer thus far lost the Question. And indeed An­tiochus, you are much too blame to have put the Romans to all this trouble, to no purpose. But any thing to stuffe out the Dimensions of a Book, that no man may imagine he could have said so little, in so much (which is the new way of Compendiousness found out by the Exposer) whereas he might have known, that, not God only, but even men alwayes do respect the Quality of any Thing, of a Book, rather then the Quantity. One Remarke I must make more, before I take leave of this page, how, having thus liberally instructed both Philip and the Treasurer, he immediately chops in p. 5.

That puts in one Baptisme for the Remission of Sins. I read it over and over, for there was somthing in it very surprising, beside the elegancy of the Verses. For the Now in that place is a word of immediate Inference, as if it appeared necessarily, from what last preceded, that he had notably foil'd the Author in some Arguments or other, and therefore exulted over him. To any man of common sense it can signifie nei [...]her more nor less then that, (whereas I upon prospect of this spoke merrily of the Athanasian Creed, Noel's and the Assemblies Catechisme, &c. wherein Philip instructed the Treasurer) the Exposer means in good earnest (if men mean what they say) that Philip, having studied the Constantinopolitan Creed himself very ex [...]ctly, explain'd every Ar­ticle of it thorowly to the Eunuch, and in especial manner that of Bap­tisme for the Remission of Sins: Which happening to have been so many hundred years before that Council was in being, must needs be an extraordinary civility in Philip, and which he would scarce have done, but for the particular sa [...]isfaction of so great a personage, that had the whole manage of the Revenue of the Queen of Ethiopia. I am sure it is more then our Church will vouchsafe in Baptisme, [...] of Infan [...]s or those of Riper Years, with their God-Fathers, but fobbs [Page 26] them of with the plain Apostles Creed: And truly the easier the better, if afttr that, and by powering water upon them, these persons be with­out any more adoe (as the Priest according to our Rubrick, shall then say) Regenerate.

To as little purpose doth he trouble in this same 5. p. Another Scrip­ture the first of John 4. 2. Every Spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in the Flesh, is of God: Which the Author urges in confirmation of what he said before concerning the Intention of Faith. But, saith the Exposer, Will a Mahumetan, or a Socinian Confession of Faith suffice? This is I trow what they call reducing a man ad Absurdum, and I doubt he has hamper'd the Author mischievously. No it will not suffice in the Mahumetam or Socinian interpretation: but a Confession according to the true sense of this, and the clear express words of Scripture in other places will do it, especially if St. John, as most men are of opinion, writ his own Gospel. Nay, though the Exposer contends against this place, he admits another concerning Peter, that is not much more pregnant. All the few primary Fundamentals of Christianity, saith he, were virtually con­tained in St. Peters short Confession of Faith. Thou art Christ the Son of the living God: For which Confession he was blest, and upon which Faith Christ declared that he would build his Church as upon a Rock. In conclusion I see Antiochus has ex mero motu & certâ Scientiâ, and Prince—like Generosi­ty, given us the Question: For I would not suspect that he hath hunted it so long till he lost it, or let it go of Necessity, because he could hold it no longer. For the Extention as well as Intention of Peters Faith, was terminated in these few words. For it is no irreverence to take notice how plain the Apostles were under that dispensation. The same John the Apostle and Evangelist C. 14. V. 26. and in the following Chapters, showes how little it was, and in how narrow a compass, that they knew and believed, and yet that sufficed. Insomuch that where C. 16. V. 17. Our Saviour promises the Holy Ghost, to instruct them further, he saith only, It is Expedient for you that I go away, for if I go not away, the Comforter will not Come to you. He saith not it is Necessary. For that Measure of true Belief would have sufficed for their own Salva­tion, but there was a larger Knowledge requisite for the future work of their Apostleship, In how many of them, and St. Peter himself as much as any, were there such Ignorances, I humbly use the word, in matters of Faith, that our Saviour could not but take notice of it and reprove them! As for Peter, when our Saviour was so near his Death as to be already be [...]ray'd, yet he, Upon whose Faith he built his Church as on a Rock, knew not the effect of his Passion, but was ready with his sword, against Christs Command and example, to have interrupted the Redemp­tion of Mankind. And this short confession, in which all the Funda­mentalls were virtually contained (as the Exposer here teacheth us, and so [Page 27] hath reduced himself to that little Grain of Faith, against which he con­tends with the Author) was upon occasion of our Saviours question; when Peter doubtless did his best, to answer his Lord and Master, and told him all he knew. For that similitude, taken from so small a G [...]aine by our Saviour, did equal the proportion of Faith then attain­able and requisite. And as in a Seed, the very Plain and Upright of the Plant is indiscernably express'd, though it be not branch'd out to the Eye, as when it ge [...]minates, spreds, blossomes, and bears fruit; so was the Christian Faith seminally straitned in that virtual sincerity, Vital Point, and Central vigour of Believing with all the heart that Jesus Christ was come in the Flesh, and was the Son of the Living God. And, would men even now Believe that one thing thorowly, they would be better Christians, then under all their Creeds, they generally are both in Doctrine and Practice. But that gradual Revelation, which after his death and Resurrection shined sorth in the Holy Ghost, must now determine us again within the Bounds of that saving Ignorance by Belief according to the Scriptures, untill the last and fu [...]l Manifestation. And the Intention of this Faith now also, as it hath been explain'd by the Inspiration of the Holy Spirit in the Sacred Writers, is suffici­ent for Salvation, without the Chcianrey and Conveyancing of humane Extentions. And the Controverter himself hath, if not by his own con­fession, yet, by his own Argument all along hitherto proved it.

In the 6. p, he saith that, where the Author charges some with in­troducing Many and New Articles of Faith, He [...] hopes he does not mean all our Thirty nine Articles. If he hopes so, why doth he raise the suspi­tion, for which indeed there is no cause imaginable, but the E [...]posers own disingenuity; the Author appearing thorow his whole Book a True Subscriber to Then [...]e, without that Latitude of Equivocation which some others use, or else they would not Publish those Doctrines they do, and be capable nevertheless of Ecclesiastical Places? But here, as though any man had meddled with those Articles, he explica [...]es his Learning out of Bishop L [...]y and of the Communio Laica, which is but his harping upon one string and his usual Scanning on his fingers. For the Author having named many and neew Articles of Faith, the Exposer revolves over in his mind Articles, Articles of—and, the word not being very pregnant, he hits at last upon the Thirty nine Articles of the Church of England: which yet the Exposer saith himself, are Articles of Peace and Consent not of Faith and Communion. Why then does he bring them by head and shoulders, when the Author he knows was only upon Articles, of Faith? He might as well have sa [...] the Lords of the Articles. But this, he saith is one, as he takes it, of our Churches greatest Eccle­siastical Policyes, that she admits the many in thousands and hundred thou­sands, without any subscription, ad Communionem Laicam. Truly she [Page 28] is ve [...]y civil, and we are an hundred thousand times oblidged to Her. But I know not whether she will take it well of him, that he, not being content with so good an Office as that of her Exposer, should pretend to be her Ecclesiastical Polititian, over an other mans head that is fitter for both, and not expect the Reversion. And she cannot but be offended, that he should thus call her Fool by craft, assigning that for her greatest Ecclesiastical Policy, when to have done otherwise would have been the greatest Impertence and Folly. But who are these the many, whom she so graciously receives Communionem Laicam without subscription? Truly all of us whom she trusts not with Teaching others or with University Degrees. The whole body of the Laity. (There again is another name or us, for we can scarse speak without affronting our selves with some contemptuous name or other that they (forsooth the Clergy) have affixed to us.

Even his Majesty too, God bless him, is one of the many, and she asks no su [...]scription of him neither, although I believe he has taken his Degree in the University. Well we must be content to do as we may: we are the many, and you are the few, and make your best of it. But now, though I am none of you, yet, I can tell you a greater Ecclesiastical Policy, then all this you have been talking of. It is a hard Word, and though it be but one Syllable, I cannot well remember it, but by good luck it was burnt by the hand of the Hangman, about that time that the Naked Truth was Printed. And had that Policy succeeded, the many must have taken not only all the Thirty Nine Articles, but all the Ecclesiastical Errours and Incroachments that escaped notice, all in the mass at once, as if they had been Articles of Faith, infallible, unalterable; but the State of the Kingdom had been apparently changed in the very Funda­mentals. For a Few of the Few, for above these forty years, have been carrying on a constant Conspiracy to turn all Upside-down in the Govern­ment of the Nation: But God in his mercy hath alwayes hitherto, and will; I hope, for ever frustrate all such Counsels.

In his 7. p. it is that he saith, the Author in his 4. p. implicitly condemns the whole Catholick Church, both East and West for being so Presumptuous in her Definitions. However if he does it but Implicitly, the Exposer might have been so Ingenuous or Prudent as not to have Explicated it further, but conceal'd it least it might do more harme, but at least not to have heigh [...]en'd it so; the whole Catholick Church, and not only so, but, the whole Catholick Church both in the East and West too (why did he not add in the North and South too?) for being so Presumptuous, a term far beyond and contrary to the Modesty and Deference of the Authors expressions. But this is the Art and Duty of Exposing, Here it is that he brandishes the whole dint of his Disputative Faculty, and if it be not the [Page 29] most rational, I dare say (and yet I should have some difficulty to per­swade men so) that it is the most foolish passage in the whole Pamphlet. It is impossible to clear the Dispute but by transcribing their own words. In the mean time therefore I heartily recommend my self to the Readers patience. The Author, pursuing his point how unsafe and unreasonable it is to Impose New Articles of Faith drawn by humane Inferences beyond the Clear Scripture Expressions; instanceth in several of the Prime and most Necessary Principles of the Trinity, especially that of the Holy Ghost. Are they not things, saith he, far above the Highest Reason and sharpest understanding that ever man had? Yet we Believe them because God, who cannot lye, hath Declared them. Is it not then a strange thing for any man to take upon him to Declare one title more of them then God hath Declared? seeing we understand not what is Declared, I mean we have no Comprehensive Know­ledge of the Matter Declared, but only a Believing Knowledge? To which the Exposer will have it that, if the Author be here bound up to his own words, (and 'tis good reason he should) he hath said that we understand not that the matter is Declared, and moreover he saith that he is sure he has done him no wrong in fixing this meaning to the Authors words. No, it is no wrong, it seems then, to say that to understand That, and to comprehend What is the same thing, As for example, (if our Igno­rance may be allowed in things so infinitely above us, to allude to things as far below us) because I understand That the Exposer here speaks Nonsense; I must therefore be able to Comprehend What is the mean­ing of his Nonsense, and be capable to raise a Rational Deduction from it. I am sure I do the Exposer right in this Inference, and should be glad he only would therefore wear it for my sake, for it will fit none but him 'twas made for. But let us come down to the particular, The Scripture, saith the Author, plainly tells, that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father, and That he is sent also by the Father, That he is sent also by the Son: but whether he Proceeds From the Son, or By the Son, the Scripture is silent. I grant that by Rational Deduction, and Humane way of Argument 'tis probable that the Holy Ghost Proceeds from the Son, as from the Father. But we understand not What the Procession or Mission of the Holy Ghost is, and therefore we cannot prove they are Both one. And therefore to determine it or any such Divine and high Mysteries by Humane Deductions, in Humane Words, to be Imposed and Believed with Divine Faith is Dangerous: And much more the Author adds demonstratively to the same purpose,, but the Exposer culls out, by the Duty of his Place, what may best serve for his, neither will that do the turn unless he also pervert it. Here again is the That and the What the same thing [...], Is it the same thing to say or understand That the Holy Ghost is sent by the Son (which is Declared in Scripture) and to understand and comprehend What the Nature of that Mission is, or What the Nature of Procession that a man may [Page 30] safely say that he Proceeds From or By the Son, as from the Father (which is not Declared in Scripture but by Humane Deduction) and exact the Divine Belief thereof under Eternal and Temporal Penalties? Yet this is the Exposers Logick. And away he goes with it, as if the world (as this inference is) were all his own, and knocks all on the head with a killing Instance which that I may still open more visibly to the Readers, I must beg pardon that I am necessitated to repeat over again their own Words sometimes upon occasion. The Exposer saith, But he means we have no Comprehensive knowledge. His meaning is good and true but his inference is stark naught, if he means therefore we understand not at all that this or that is Declared. But the Author neither says nor means any such thing, and the Exposer does him notwit [...]hstanding his ave [...]ment to the Contrary, the most manifest wrong imaginable: for as much as he would not only fix a false meaning upon the Authors words which I first mentioned in the beginning, but upon these other words also which, contrary to their plaine signification, he produces for proof against him. They are by the Exposers own relation, If then our Reason understand not what is Declared (which is the very Equipollent of what the Author had said, that we have no Comprehensive knowledge of the matter Declared) how can we by reason make any Deduction by way of Ar­gument from that which we understand [...]? No more. From whence it is evident from that virtual repetition and natural reflection that every Conclusion hath of and upon its Premisses, that the full sense of the words must be— from that which we understand not, Comprehensive, And yet he saith that he does him no wrong, he is sure he does not in affix­ing this meaning unto those words. And proceeds, Is it even so? Then let us put the Case with reverence that Almighty God, who assuming I suppose, the shape of an Angel, treated with Abraham face to face, as a man doth with his Friend. Should for once have spoken in the same manner, to Ar­rius or Socinus, and made this one Declaration, that the Catholick Churches Doctrine of the Trinity was true, and his false: then I demand, would not this have been demonstration enough of the Faith which we call Ca­tholick either to Socinus or Arrius? And yet all these contradictory Argu­ments which either of them had once fancied so insolable, supposing them not answered in particular, would remain against it, and stand as they did before, any such declaration, and yet all this without giving him any compre­hensive knowledge. This instance is made in Confutation of his own false supposition that the Authors words, if then our reason understand not with comprehensive knowledge what is declared, how can we then make any deduction by way of Arguments from that which we under­stand not, did in their true meaning signifie how can we by reason make any deduction by way of Argument, from that which we understand not to have been declared, or, that I may p [...]t it the furthest I can imaginable, [Page 31] to the Exposers purpose or service, how can [...]e by reason understand that it is declared, which is to impose a most ridiculous and impossible sense up­on the Authors plain words; for if we neither understand That nor What, there is an end of all understanding. Yet admitting, here, sayes the Ex­poser, I have stated you a Case which proves the contrary, for here Arrius or Socinus have no comprehensive knowledge of what is declared, and yet they understand that it is declared; and doubtless the Author would say so too, without ever meaning the Contrary: yea and that this revelation would have been demonstration enough of that Faith, which we call Catho­lick. But what would become of their former Contradictory Arguments which the Exposer saith, would stand as they did before, and remain against it. I cannot vouch for the Author, that he would be of the same opinion. For I cannot comprehend though God had not answered those Argu­ments of theirs, in particular as the Exposer puts it, that those Arguments would or could remaine against it, and stand as they did before any such declaration, to Arrius and Sacinus after they had received a sufficient demonstration from Gods own mouth by New Revelation. They would indeed remain against it, and stand as they did before to Mr. Sherlocke. But when I have thus given the humorous Exposer his own will and swing in every thing, yet this superlunary instance does not serve in the least to confirme his Argument that he makes against the Authors words, after his transforming them: For here Arrius and Socinus only bring their sense of hearing, and having heard this from God, do not by Reason make any Deduction by way of Argument, but by a believing knowledge do only assent to this, second further Revelation: Nor can they then from this second Revelation make any third step of Argument to extend it beyond its own tenour, without incurring the Authors just & wise Argument again, that seeing our reason understands not what is declared, I mean we have no comprehensive knowledge of this Doctrine of Trinity. (which the Exposer supposes to be declared) how can we by reason make any deduction by way of Argument from that which we un­derstand not, to wit, not comprehensively? As I have abundantly clear­ed. But this instance was at first extinguished, when I shewed in the beginning that he did impertinently tradnce the Authors words, and forge his meaning.

In the mean time, though he saith put the Case with Reverence, when the Case so put cannot admit it, I cannot but at last reflect, upon the Exposers unpardunable indiscretion, in this more then absurd and mon­struous representation of God almighty, assuming the shape of an Angel as he saith he treated with Abraham face to face as a man do [...]h with his friend, to Discourse with Arrius and Socinus. These are small escapes wi [...]h which he aptly introduces such an interview and conference, that he treated our 4th. Abraham face to face, as a man doth with his friend: [Page 32] for it is true Abraham is Stiled the friend of God, and that God spoke to him; but it is never said in Scripture that God did Treat, that is a word of Court, not of Scripture: No nor that God spoke to him face to face. But it is said in Sripture only of Moses, Exod. 33. 11. The Lord spoke to him face to face as a man speaketh unto his friend. But that was a priviledge peculiar to Moses. Numbers 12. 5. And the Lord came down in a Pillar of Cloud, and stood in the door of the Tabernaele of the Congrega­tion, and called Aaron and Miriam, and they both came forth, and he said, hear now my words if there be a Prophet among you, I the Lord will make my self known to him in a Vision, and will speak unto him in a Dream: my servant Moses is not so who is faithful in all my house, with him will I speak mouth to mouth even apparently and not in darke Speeches, and the simili­tude of the Lord shall he behold, wherefore then were not you afraid to speak against my Servant Moses? (the Exposer is not afraid to do him manifest injury.) for Deut. 34. 10. And there arose not in Israel a Prophet like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, &c. And much more might be said of this matter, were the man capable of it: But I perceive he nei­ther reads nor understands Scripture, and one Divine Criticism is stock enough it seems to set up an Exposer. Neither is it so notorious an errour that he saith God assumed the shape of an Angel to treat with him. I would be glad to know of the Exposer, seeing he is so Cheru­bick▪ what is the shape of an Angel? Some humane Criticks have told me that it was the similitude of a Calfe. But Gods appearing in a sha e to Abraham, when he treated with him face to face was in the shape of a man. Gen. 18 1. The Lord appeared to him in the Plane of Mamre as he sate in the Tent door, and so three men stood by him, &c. These are easie slips and he that stumbles and falls not, gains a step. Yet for one as he mocks the Author p. 2. That appears as one drop'd down from Heaven, vouching himself a Son of the Church of England, teaching as one having authority like a Father, to trip in this manner, is something indecent. But to bring God in to so little a purpose, contrary to all rules, that I have seen one with a better grace brought down by a Machine to treat with Arrius and Socinus, no other Company, those who have contended against the Son of God and his Holy Spirit, whose Opinions have been the Pest of the Clergy for so many Ages, to have them now at last brought in as Pri­vado's to the Mysteries of Heaven, and the Trinity; what Divine in his Witts but would rather have lost an Argument! What will the Gentle­man I last named say, to see such a reconciliation, to behold Arrius and Socinus in so close Communion with God, as to be admitted even to single Revelation: He cannot then avoid thinking, what he lately printed, and now with more reason: That God is all Love and Patience when he has taken his fill of Revenge, as others use to say the Devil is good when he is pleased. What a shame is it to have men like the Exposer, who are [Page 33] dedicated to the service of the Church, and who ought as in the place quoted by the Author in the present Argument, they of all other to hold fast the form of sound Words, thus by their rash levity administer so much occasion upon the most revered subject, that one can scarce answer them in their own dialect without seeming though never so averse to border upon their Profaneness. But those are the Divines in Mode, who being by their Dignities and Preferments plump'd up beyond humane proportion, do whether for their Pride or Ignorance, neither under­stand to speak of God, which ought to be their study, with any tolerable Decorum; These are the great Animadverters of the times, the Church-respondents in the Pew, Men that seem to be members on­ly of Chelsey Colledge, nothing but broken Windows, bare Walls, and rotten Timber. They with a few Villanous words, and a s [...]ared Reason, are the only Answerers of good and serious Books: But then they think a Book to be sure fully answered, when as the Exposer has by an humane Criticisme, they write or scribble the same number of pages. For the Authors Book of the Naked Truth, chancing to be of sixty six pages, the Exposer has not bated him an Ace, but payed him exactly, though not in as good Billet, yet in as many Notches. This be­ing done, then the Exposer ubiquits himself, peeping at the Key-holes, or picking the Locks of the Bed-chambers of all the great Ministres, and though they be reading Papers of State▪ or at the Stool, more season­ably obtrudes his Pamphlet. Next he sends it by an express to his friends at the Universities, but especially to his own Colledge, and can scarce refrain from recommending it to the Tutors to instruct their Pupills, reading it to them in lieu of their Lectures. But they are lay'd in for provision by the Manciple and Butler, and that Quarter few escape without being sconc'd for an Animadversion. The Country Cathedralls learn it latest, and arrive by flower degrees to their understanding, by the Carrier. It grows a business of Chapter, and they admire it in body as a profound Book of Theology. Those of 'em that can confide in one another, discourse it over in private, and then 'tis odds, but, before the Laity get notice of it, they first hear it preach'd over by him whose turn it is next Sunday in the Minster, the rest conceal the Fraud for the reputation of the Diocess. After the Book is grown common the plagi­ary wonders how, but that proportionable Wits jump together, the Ex­poser could hit so right upon his Motions. But if the Dean foresee that 'tis a very vendible Book, he you may imagine forestalls the Market, and sends up for a whole Dicker of 'em to retaile at his last advantage. All this while the little Emissaryes here in town are not idle, but hawk about from London to Westminster with their Britches stuft with the Copyes, and will sell them to any one for Commendation. Nor do the grudge [Page 34] this drudgery out of the hope and vision that they themselves also may, at some happy hour or other, be received into the band of Answerers, and merit the same Applause and advancement. But if they found it so hard a task as I do this, sure they would be better advised. 'Tis a great paine to answer, even an Animadverter; they are much happyer of the rwo 'tis better by far Preaching, and a Sermon is soon curryed over. Yet sometimes it happens the Printing of a Sermon is toilsome afterwards and hazardous: for even one that was preached before His Ma [...]esty, and by his special command to be Printed, is it seems making over again, there having been sure some error in the Fonte, and has lay'd several months in disobdience. But when it shall come out new vamp'd and refitted, it will be a question worthy the Schooles, whe­ther it be the same Sermon, and whether he has not prevaricated against his Majesties special Command, and Sinn'd on, by Printing without a Licence. Yet I rather expect that after all, it will incurre the same fate with that memorable Sermon preached before the House of Commons, at their receiving the Sacrament upon the first opening of the Parlia­ment: Which for some dangerous opinions there vented, was so far from ever coming forth, that one might sooner have obtain'd His Majesties special Command against over Printing it. But to return to the Exposer, who by this impertinence has forced an occasion upon me to effect on some Few who are guilty of the same, and may thank him for the favour. May not, with more reason p. 1. then he saith it of the Author, the Church justly complaine of him for thrusting out such crude indigested matter, without communicating these conceptions of his to some that would have shewed him the weak and blind sides of them? I profess after those passages of his that I have already taken notice of, and this egregious one the last, wherein by so few lines he hath so amply molested the Judicious Reader, I do not think I ow him the patience to consider what remains with the same exactness, every thing that he adds henceforward growing metho­dically slighter and worse as it hastens to, the Center of Levity, the Conclusion of his Pamphlet. Yet somthing I will reply all along, with more justice then he practises toward the Author, for whereas he picks out here and there what he thinks; tenderest in him to tire upon, and render it by his affected misrepresentation obnoxious, but shuts his eyes as not being able to indure the resplendence of those evident Truths which he delivers with great demonstration; I shall in the Ex­poser only observe and deal with what seems the least impertinent. Only I may not perhaps think him worth the transcribing so punctually as I have done hiterto, but for brevity more often refer to his own pages.

Therefore be pleased to look on his p. 7. where, relating to what the Author had said p. 4. of the Procession of the Holy Ghost, wherein the [Page 35] Greek Creed and ours differ, he muffles it all up with saying that yet this breaks [...] Communion between us, the difference arising only from the In­adequation of Languages. Which is a Mathematical and more Civil way, either of owning his Ignorance in so weighty a point, or confessing that he cannot answer what the Author hath said upon it. If by reason of the Inadequation of Languages a mystery so inexplicable could not be expressed why did either our Church or theirs meddle in it beyond the Scripture? There is no Inadequation between the Languages, in speaking of it, Dia and Apo a Patre Filioque, and a Patre per Filium: From the Father and Son, or From the Father By the Son: Proceeding or Sending: But no lan­guage can reach the nature of Profession or Mission, nor to repre­sent to humane understanding how they can both be the same, or wherein they may differ. He does in this as the Arrian Bishops in their subscription of the Nicene Creed to Jovianus Socr. l. 3. c. 21. which now they said they could do with a good Conscience, understanding neque vo­cabulum substantiae apud sanctos Patres ad consuetudinem Graeci Sermonis capi. 'Tis an happy thing I see to find our Church in good humour, else she might have made more adoe about an Article of Faith, as she does about much lesser matters. 'Tis not strange that the Exposer finds no greater difference or distinction between terms so distant, seeing in the last Pa­ragraph above, he was so dull that he understood not What is What. But he most aptly concludes how Demosthenes once answered the Orator Aeschines, who kept much adoe about an improper word. The Fortunes of Greece do not depend upon it. So trivial a thing it seems does the Ex­poser reckon it, to have improper words obtruded upon Christians in a Creed, without believing of which no man can be saved, and whereup­on the Eastern and Western Churches divided with so much concern­ment. But how proper and ingenious a contrivance was it of the Au­thor (who is the very Cannon of Concinnity) to bring in Demosthenes and Aeschines, as being doubtless both of the Greek Church, to decide the matter in Controversy of the Procession or Mission of the Holy Ghost between them and the West. Antiochus, whensoever you take the Pew again, be sure you forget not Demosthenes and Aeschines: For it will be to you as good as current Money, which answers all things. The Ex­poser, though here so gentle, yet, in the very page before this was as dog­ged, to as good men as the Greeks some of them, the Papists, Lutherans, and Calvinists. The Author, he sayes, may make as bold with them as he pleases, for we are none of these, I am not bound to make War in their vindi­cation. But if he should once Kyrie Elieson, what would become of us? Good Mother Church of England maintaine this humor thorow, carrey it on, but above all things make much of this thy Exposer; give him any thing, think nothing too good for him, Happy the Church that hath, and miserable that wants such a Champion!

[Page 36] But I must find some more expeditious way of dealing with him, and walk faster, for really I get cold. The force of all that he [...]aith in the 8, and 9, pages, is to represent the Author [...]idiculously and odi­ously, as if upon his wishing that Constantine had commanded both parties Homoousian, and Homoiosian to acquiece in the very Scripture Expressions, without any addition, whereby he is contident the Arrian He esie had soon expired, he did by consequence cut, Poe-dike to let in a Flood of Heresies, upon the Fenns of Christianity. But the words with which he cuts the Author down, are Why this was the designe of the Arrians themselves, that which they drove at Court, that silence might be imposed on both Parties. Well, and 'twas very honestly done of them, and modestly, and like Christians, if the Controversie arose, as men think, about the Imposing of a Creed, or Article co [...]ncerning a Question so fine, in Words so Gross, which yet a man must Believe that without Believing it, no man can be Saved; though no humane understanding can comprehend the subject of the Question, nor the Scripture Expres­sions, as they conceived, did reach it. There is field enough for Faith in the Scriptures, without laying out more to it; and to resigne their Reason to be silenced in a Question, stirred up by others, that Peace might be established in the Church, was Ingenuity in them: and the contrary proceeding of the Church, was the occasion of many other Heresies that else had never been heard of. But the Exposer had said somthing, if he could have divined that they would have used this silencing the disputes by Constantine as the Arminians (so they were at that time called) did the same in the Reigne of his late Majesty, who pro­curing a command from him to prohibite all writing or preaching about those points, having thereby gagged their Adversaries, did let the Press and the Pulpit loose more then ever to propagate their own Doctrines. That which the Exposer drops in the ardour of this Argu­ment. p. 9. How many terms in the Athanasian Creed, which to seek for in the Apostles Creed, or in the whole Bible, were to as much purpose as it was for the old affected Ciceronian in Erasmus, to labour and toile his Brains to turn that Creed into Ciceronian Latine. Yet these are the terms in which the Catholick Church thought she spoke safely in these Divine matters; is totidem verbis, either to beg the Question, or make a formal resignation of it. And our Church (howsoever else he may have oblidged her) has reason to resent this indiscretion. Why was she her self so indiscreet to admit such a Blab into her secrecies? How if no man else ought to have known it? It is an ill matter to put such things in mens minds, who other­wise perhaps would never have thought of it. 'Tis enough to turn a mans stomach that is not in strong health, not only against the Atha­nasian Creed, but against all others for its sake. He saith p. 8. Scoffing­ly that the Author is one of those whom St. Paul forbids to be admitted to [Page 37] any doubtful disputations: But let the Exposer see whether it be not himself rather that is there spoken of. And withall that he may make some more proper use of the place, which he warily cites not, I recom­mend it to him in order to his dispute about future Ceremonies: 'Tis the 14. Rom. v. 7. Where St. Paul calls them that contend for him the Weak Brother, Weak in the Faith; and such therefore the Apostle ex­cludes from doubtful Disputations, so that one gone so far in Cere­mony as the Exposer, had no License from him to Print Animadversi­ons.

As to what he patches in p. 10. upon the matter of School-Divinity, as if the Author poured contempt upon the Fathers, I referre it to the Animadversions on the Chapter about preaching, and should I forget, I desire him to put me in mind of it. And p. 11. and 12. where the Au­thor having in his 2. and 3. p. said that, None can force another to believe, no more then to read where the Candle does not give good light, and more very significantly to that purpose; the Exposer flying giddily about it, burns his wings with the very similitude of a Candle. Sure if a man went out by night on Trauelling, or Bat-fowling, or Proctoring, he might catch these Exposers by Dozens. But the force of his Argument is p. 13. Whereas the Author says, you can force no mans sight, nor his Faith. [...]he replyes, If it be not in any mans truth to Discerne Fundamental Truths, (of which this Chapter treats) when they are laid before his Eyes when there is a sufficient proposal, then it is none of his fault. Yet this is as weak as water: For, supposing a Fundamental Truth clearly demon­strated from Scripture, though a man cannot force himself to believe it, yet there is enough to render a man inexcusable to God. God hath not been wanting (one of the Exposers scraps) in necess [...]iries: but I hope he will not compel God too, but that he may dispense his saving and effi­catious influence (without which all that sufficient Proposal he speaks of will have been insufficient,) only to the minds of whom he pleases. The Animadverter in defending that a man can force himself to believe, argues against Experimental Demonstration (try it in any man, in every man) but raises only a maligne ignorant and Caviling dispute, herein to reduce the Author to the Dreggs, forsooth, of Mr. Hobb's his Divinity, I. e. It is not in the man's fault saith he, if he cannot believe after a sufficient Proposal, He saith, he is sure, too it is not then the man's fault (so in the Dispute lately about That and What, he said, he was sure he did the Author no wrong) But I desire him first to read Romans 3. the 4, 5, 6. verses, with the Context: But especially Romans 9 from the 13. to the 22. verse, where the Apostle introduces a man objecting in the same words to the same purpose, Thou wilt say unto me why doth God yet find fault, &c. And if the Exposer will not take the Apostles Answer, but be sure of the contrary, then he too cannot, it seems force himself to be­lieve [Page 38] after what he ought to have allowed for a sufficient Proposal. But where the Author supposes that any man does clearly or sufficiently de­monstrate a Fundamental Truth from Scripture: yet unless a mans Brains be clear it is to him no demonstration. You suppose that all of you do clearly demonstrate, so that if they don't Believe you may justly open their Eyes with a paire of Pincers. Whereas there are some Few among the Few, such Spermologers, that unless a grain of Faith fall down, by the by, from Heaven your seed is Barren. I do not reckon much upon a Church Historical devilish beliefe. Unless a thing be in the Express words of Scripture, there are some of the Laity to whom a Counsel cannot de­monstrate clearly, a Preacher cannot demonstrate, sneezing Powder cannot demonstrate, no Earthly can do it. Christ used Clay indeed, but it was his Spittle that gave the healing quality, and cured the Blind man. Alas you are so wise in your own conceit, that you cannot conceive how simple some poor men are. He saith, the Reason which helps every man to see these Fundamental Truths, at least when they are shew'd and pointed out to him (such Truths you must conceive as the Creed Doctrines of the Trinity) is a vulgar and popular thing (what need then so many Disputes in the Councills? and sure the Author, that he may not admit any mans hypocrisie and wilfulness to be gross and palpable, imagins there are a world of Idiots. So the exposer would now cokes the Lay-multitude, whom before he call'd the hundred thousands, and the many, and for their simplicity excusable from subscribing the 39. Articles, to be grown on the suddain so very wise men, that he may with justice therefore compel them by corporal punishments or penalties to believe in spight of their Teeth or their understandings. Alas if any men consider those Funda­mental Truths, so subject he saith to vulgar and popular reason, it is one of the difficultest things in the world, and yet more to those who are most removed from being Idiots to believe them; and some men by their clear Demonstrations, by their sufficient Proposals, by their Creeds have rendered it still more difficult. Why have I wasted all this on the Exposer who, (whether it be his fault or no) yet cannot force himself to Believe even the Naked Truth, though so clearly demonstrated from Scripture (and the Exposer I suppose believes the Scripture▪) though so Consonant and obvious to the most vulgar and popular reason, but Be­lieves his own Animadversions, against the most vulgar and popular Reason, to be a sufficient Proposal to the Contrary? In the 13. and 14. p. speaking of that place Gal. 5. 12. which the Author understands of the Magistrates Power, but the Exposer will have to be Excommunication; I crave leave to dissent from both of them, humbly conceiving that the Word there of Cutting off is rather meant in the usual sense▪ of Scripture in a multitude of places, for Gods taking them of by his hand. But whatsoever it be, I desire the Exposer for his own sake to take good [Page 39] heed that, whether it be Executing, or Punishing, or Banishing, or Ex­communicating, or taking them away Gods hand of Justice, the Apostle speaks of such as taught for Circumcision, and alluding to the word wishes that they were rather cut aff, who trouble the Galatians a­bout the retaining of that, and who would oblidge them contrary to their Christian Liberty to such Jewish Ceremonies.

For what he ha [...]es in of the great and notable effect p. 14. of confe­rences, wishing that there were such held publickly or privately to sa­tisfie the Non-conformists; truly though they be no great men; yet perhaps it were fit they were first satisfied what kind of Reception they should meet with. But I doubt such Conferences in Publick are but the Resemblance and Epitome of General Councils. For that of the Savoy in which he instances it might almost as well have heen in Piemont. A man disintessed either way, might make a pleasant story of the Anecdota of that Meeting, and manifest how well his Majesties Gracious Declaration, be­fore his return, and his Broad-Seal▪ afterwards were pursued. But it is not my present business. But for shortness sake, as to his desire That he that does not believe the notable effect of them would but read what my Lord Bishop of Winchester printed of that Conference, where the Adverse Party was driven immediatly to assert that whatsoever may be the occasion of sin to any must be taken away: I shall as civilly as I can, though I deferre much to his extraordinary veracity, tell the Exposer I do not believe him.

I come now to what he p. 14, 15, 16, 17. and in other places declares to be his Judgement, as to Compulsion in matter of Faith and Religi­on. The Authors opinion appears in the beginning, where I stated his own words thorow this Chapter. The expose does beat the aire. p. 14. concerning the Donatists, a must seditious and turbulent sect. who saith the Author (as it is objected by those that would have Force used) some of them came to St. Augustine and gave thanks, that the Civil Power was made use of to testraine them, confessing that was the means that brought them to consider more calmly their own former extravaga [...] opinions, and so brought them home to the true Church. But he quarrels the Author for his four answers, against the Magistrates using that as a Precedent. The first, our Case is not in repressing seditious Practises, but inforcing a Confes­sion of Faith. I will return straight to the Exposers Answer to this. The Authors second is; unless it can be evidenced that their hearts were chang­ed as well as their Profession (a thing impossible to prove) all this proves no­thing. Neither does it. For the dispute now betwixt the Author and his Adversary is, whether it be possible to compel a man to believe. This instance proves only that those Donatists were forced to come to Church. Therefore there cannot be a more uncharitable and disingenuous thing invented, then for the Exposer to upbraid him with such a retort, for ought he knows they were Hypoorites: (the Author does say so) so for [Page 40] ought we to know this Author is all this while a Jesuite, and writes this Pamphlet only to imbroile us Protestants. But he must make some sputter, rather then be held to the terms of the Question: and truly I perceive. Antiochus is very weary and shifts like a Crane (not to instance in a worse Bird) first one foot and then another to rest on, being tired to stand so long within so close a Circle. For thirdly the Author answers, Put the case their hearts were really changed, as to matter of Belief, 'tis evident their hearts were very worldly still, grovelling on earth not one step nearer Heaven: He will not be candid without Compulsion, but leaves out what follows; and sure their heart was evil, which was far m [...]re moved for the quiet enjoyment of this worlds good, then for the blessed enjoy­ment of Christ. In earnest I begin to think an Exposer is a Rational Creature. For had he not on pu [...]pose left these last words out, he could not have cryed, A horrible [...] saying! We may forgive the Author any thing after this; which is all the Answer he gives: so charit­able is the Exposer grown to the Donatists, for every man that will come to Church is ipso facto with him, a true Believer. But it did in truth ap­pear to have been so, and there is not the least uncharitableness in this that the Author has said. For by those Donatists own confession, it was not any love to that which they now owned for the Truth to St. Austin, not any Convicton of Conscience, not so much as even [...] inclination to obey the Magistrate; but meer fine force and fear of Punishment that brought them to Church, and whatsoever good came on't was by accident. Whether might not a man adde that their giving thanks for that force, and so owning that Principle of Compulsion, was a further evidence that their heart was naught still, even while they were with St. Augustine? I think a man might, untill I be better informed. But the Author having given a fourth answer, that, suppose they were now really brought over to the Truth of the Church of Belief, and Religion by the Magistrates severity, (I express it thus that I may with the Exposer trifle about the Jews care) yet St. Paul hath said, God forbid we should do evil that good may come of it? This is answer enough for a man of un­derstanding. For it is not lawful, suppose for St. Austin himself, to be­guile any man even into Christianity: unless as St. Paul perhaps, 2 Cor. 12. 16. Being crafty, caught the Corinthians with guile, by preaching the Gospel without being Burthensome to the People. No man ought to cheat another though to the true beliefe: Not by Interlining the Scripture. Not by false Quotation of Scripture, or of a Father. Not by forging a Heathen Prophecy, or altering an Author. Not by false Syllogisme: Not by telling a lye for God. And if no Pety Fraud much less can a Pia Vis be allowed, to compell them to Faith, to compell them to a Creed, seeing it were to do evil that grod may come of it: much less to a Creed not perfectly Scriptural, and, instead of being inforced, indeed weakned [Page] by compulsion, seeing it is impossible to compel a man to believe, and some Divines teach us to believe (though I suspend,) that even God himself cannot, or doth not Compel men to Believing. But now it falls in naturally to me to be as good as my word, to consider what the Exposer replyes to the Author's first answer concerinig the Donatists, that our Case is of inforcing a Confession of Faith, not concerning seditious Practises, of which the Donatists were notoriously guilty, in which Case he had shown before, that the Civil Magistrate may proceed to Punishment. Wherein the Author reasons with his usual justness, and I though a very slender accession, cannot but come into him. For St. Paul, in the 13. Chapter of the Romans, laying out the Boundaries of the Duty of Christian subjects and the Magistrates Power; saith, Rulers are not (ought not to be) a terrour to good works, but to evil, and so forward: but to the Christian people he saith, they must be subject not only for wrath as those Donatists were afterwards, but for Conscience sake. And the subjection he defines is in doing good, walking up [...]ightly, keeping the Moral Law, Fearing, Honouring, and Paying Tribute to the Magistrate. But not one word saith the Apostle of forbearing to Preach out of that Obedience; saying in another place Necessity is laid upon one and woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel: (and that supposes too meeting) and as little of Compelling to hear. For in those times and a great while after, there was no inforcing to Christianity. It was very long before that came in fashion: And, writing on the suddain, I do not well remember whether it did ever before the dayes of Picarro and Almagro, the Apostles of the Indians. yet upon recollection it was sooner. But what saith the Exposer to this of the Donatists, whom the Author allows only to have been punishable only for seditious Practises, having before declared that for such as only refuse to conforme to the Churches established Doctrine and Discipline (pardon him if he say really he cannot find any war­rant or so much as any hint from the Gospel to use any Force to compel them: and from Reason sure there is no motive to use force, because as he shewed be­fore, Force can't make a man believe your Doctrine, but only as an Hypocrite, Profess what be believes not. I expect that the Exposer, in this place above all other, which I guess was his greatest motive to this Imployment, should ply and overlay him now with Reason, but especially with Scrip­ture, let us hear how he answers. I say only this p: 5. (for he speaks now of our Non-Conformists) the very Act against them calls them Se­ditious Conventicles, and openly to break so many known Laws of the Land, after so many reinforcements, is not this to be turbulent? This now you must understand to be Reason, and not Scripture: That I suppose as the strongest is reserved for the Rear. Truly, (as far as a man can compre­hend by comparing that with other Acts of this Parliament,) they did only appoint that the Penalty of Sedition should ly against those that frequent such Meetings: as in the Act against Irish Catel, if it be not in it self a Nuisance no Law-givers can make it so. Nor can any Legislators [Page] make that to be Sedition which is not Sedition in its own nature. So Prohibitions of that kind operate no more as to the intrinseque Quality, then a publick. Allowance of taking away any honest mens Goods by vio­lence and giving it another name, would extinguish the Robbery. It was the King and Parliaments prudence to make such Laws, and as long as they shall continue of that mind, it is reason the Non-Conformists should lye under the Penalty, which I humbly conceive is all that could be intended, But the Exposer rivets this with Reason again, not Gospel. And was it not ever understood so in all Religions; even in Heathen Rome? The most learned P. Aerodius tells us (Does he so? What is it I beseech you) that the Roman Senate (the Exposer quotes it at large as a story of great use and not to be hudled over; I must be glad to contract it) made an Act against the Conventicles of certaine Innovators in their Religion; if any particular person judged such a sacrifice to be necessary, he must repair first to the Praetor, he to the Senate, where the Quorum must be an hundred, and they must not neither give him leave if at all to have above five persons pre­sent at the Meeting. The self same number, beside the Dissenters own Family, is so far forth indur'd by an Act of this present Parliament, that there must be more then Five to make it a Conventicle. This is a very subtile Re­marke that he has made, as if it were one of those Witty accidents of Fortune, or an extraordinary hand of Providence, that the Senate of Rome and the Parliament of England should hit so put, upon an Act of the same nature: And upon that number of Five. However they are oblidg'd to him, and he deserves the publick Thanks for furnishing them, so long after, with a Precedent. I confess I alwayes wonder'd they would al­low them so many as Five, for fear when, not two or three, but Five of'em were gathered together God should bear their request: and it seem'd therefore to me a Formidable Number. But where has the Example been hid so long? I believe the Exposers study has laid much this way. But this was so deep an Arcanum that was fit for none but an Arch-Bishops Clo­ser. I wish he have come honestly by it. But Murder I see and Theft will out, and so this comes to light by a blabbing Animadverter, that cannot keep counsel, but will violate the Ecclesiastical secret rather then lose the Leachery of his Tattle and the vain-glory of his Pedantry. I could be glad to know what complexion this Exposer is of. I am perswaded, whatsoever he may be now, he was once extreme faire: for I remember since I was at School: that the learned P. Ovidius told me, that the Crow was once a white Bird, and much in Apollo's favour till for telling of Tales,

And of another, the fairest thing that ever eyes were laid on, but for car­rying of Storyes, was turn'd into a Jackdaw, and grew as black as a Crow, Filching, and Kaw me and Ile Kaw thee, ever after.

And that which sure must make him more black, more a Jack-daw, and like it, worthy to be expelled from the guard, and from the protection of Minerva, and who henceforward

is, that he does with open mouth proclaim the Naked design of all the Few that are of his Party. p. 12. The Jews in Rome are constrained once a week to hear a Christian Sermon. The same p. 12. We that would oblidge him to open his Eyes whether he will or no. p. 14. Iean only wish for the present, that by forcing them into our Churches, they may hear our defences, p. 17. I speak nothing more against them then that they may he brought to our Churches, &c. All this as the last result and greatest condescension of his Ecclesiastical Clemency. In conclusion he declares he would have them forced: and for what manner of force, violence, punishent or penalty he leaves it all open, go as high as men will. These things still are not Scripture neither, but Reason. His first was an Heathenish Reason in one sense, and this a Jewish in another. For I confess it is a very pregnant and adequate example, and of great authority for us to imitate; that the Jews in Rome are con­strained once a week to hear a Christian Sermon. What could there be more proportionable, then to resemble the proceeding with Christians among themselves here in England, not differing in any point of Faith, with the proceeding at Rome against the Jews? But that the Exposer should impli­citly liken and compare our Bishops to the Pope, may perhaps not be taken well by either Party. So that I dare say, had he consulted with his usual Prudence, he would not have disoblidged both sides at once. But for the Precedent, I have nothing to oppose to this more then the first, it being doubtless of notable effect, as notable as that of the Piemont conference. On­ly out of the affection I have for him, I would wish him to correct here one slip, if I be rightly informed; for some that have been abroad say his Intelligence from Rome has failed him, for that it is not once a week, but once a year that the Jews at Rome are, oblidged, forced, to hear a Chri­stian Sermon. And therefore, when the Parliamentum Indoctum sits again, I would advise him not to make his Act too severe here upon this mistake, then it is against those Judaick Non-Conformists at Rome.

But the next Reason would be so extraordinary troublesome to the Few, that are of the Exposers party and to himself, that, if he had thorowly consi­der'd it, I question whether he would have been so charitable to the Fana­ticks, that he would oblige them to open their Eyes whether they will or no. For it would require two of the Church of England to every Non-confor­mist, unless 'twere here and there one that had lost an Eye in the Service. Less would not do the business decently, and those two also must be well in order, to open the Non-conformists Eyes both at once, lest one Eye should be of one and the other Eye of a contrary opinion. And then they should in humanity, give them some interval for winking. Else they had as good cut off their Eye-lids, as the Episcopal Carthaginians used the Presbyterian Regulus, for keeping in the true sense to his Covenant. But on the other side, it would look too big for a Company of beggarly Fanaticks, to be waited upon in as much Majesty as Obeshankanogh the King of Virginia, that had two Squires of the Body in constant attendance, to lift up his Eye-lids [Page] as oft as he conceiv'd any man worthy to be look'd upon. But let the Ex­poser order it as he pleases, I am not bound to be any of his Sight-suppor­ters. Onely this, it would be very improper for him to chuse any one that is blind to that employment. For his several times repeated wish, that they might be forced to come to Church to give them a fair hearing, and to bear their discourses: truly I believe they know the Lion by the Claw, there is a great part of Oratory consists in the choice of the Person that is to per­swade men. And a great Skill of whatsoever Orator is, to perswade the Auditory first that he himself is an honest and a fair man. And then he is like to make the more impression on them too, if he be so prudent as to chuse an acceptable subject to speak on, and manage it decently, with fit ar­guments and good language. None but the very rabble love to hear any thing scurrilous or railing; especially if they should hear themselves rail'd on by him, they would be ready to give him the due applause of Petroni­us his Orator, with fl [...]ging the stones about his ears, and then leaving him to be his own Auditory. Now, they have had so ample experiment of the Exposer as to all these points, in his Defence against the Naked Truth, that I doubt his perswasion to this comming to hear him or others, will be of little force with them, and nothing would oblige these Donatists to it, but the utmost extremity; nor then would they find themselves one step nearer hea­ven. His Book is as good to them as a Sermon, and no doubt he has preach'd as well as printed it, and took more pains in it than ordinary; did his best. Must they, will they think, be compelled to make up the pomp of his Auditory? Must they, while the good Popish Fathers suffer'd those of Chiapa to come to Church with their [...] pots, to comfort their hearts, be inforced to come to Church by him, to have Snush thrust up their Noses, to clear their Brains for them 'Tis the onely way to continue and increase the Sch [...]sme. But in good sober earnest, 'tis happy that some or other of this Few chances ever and a non to speak their minds out, to shew us plainly what they would be at. Being conscious of their own unworthi­ness, and hating to be reformed, it appears that they would establish the Christian Religion by a [...] way, and gather so much Force that it might be in their power, and we lie at their mercy, to change that Religion into Heathenisme Judaisme, Turcisme, any thing. I speak with some emoti­on, but not without good reason, that I question whether, which way soever the Church Revenues were applied, such of them would not betake them­selves to that side as nimbly as the Needle to the Load stone. Have they not already, ipso facto renounc'd their Christianity, by avowing this Prin­ciple, so contrary to the Gospel? Why do not they Peter Hermite it, and stir up our Prince to an Holy War abroad, to propagate the Protestant Re­ligion, or at least our Discipline and Ceremonies, and they take the Front of the Battel? No 'tis much better lurking in a fat Benefice here, and to do­mineer in their own Parishes above their Spiritual Vassals, and raise a kind of Civil War at home, but that none will oppose them. Why may they not, [Page] as well as force men to Church, eram the Holy Supper too down their Throsts (have they not done something not much unlike it) and drive them into the Rivers by thousands to be baptized or drowned? And yet this, af­ter the King and Parliament by his, their, Gracious Indulgence have enacted a Liberty for Five beside their own Family to meet together in their Religious Worship: and could not therefore in end at the same time to force them to go to Church with the utmost or any severity. What can be the end of these things, but to multiply Force with Force, as one absurdity is the conse­quence of another, till they may again have debased the Reason and Spirit of the Nation, to make them fit for Ignorance and Bondage? Is it not rea­son, if they had care or respect to mens souls (which they onely exercise it seems the cure of, perhaps not that neither, but evacuate one Residence by another) to allow that men should address themselves to such Minister as they think best for their souls health? Men are all infirm and indisposed in their spiritual condition. What sick man, but, if a Physician were inforced upon him, might in good prudence suspect it were to kill him, or that, if the next Heir and the Doctor could agree, he would certainly do it? I shall con­clude this reasonable transport with remarking that although the Author did modestly challenge any man to shew him a warrant or colour or hint from Scripture, to use Force to constrain men to the Established Doctrine and Worship, and offer'd to maintain that nothing is more clear to be dedu­ced or is more fully exprest in Scripture, nor is more suitable to Natural Reason, than that no man be forced in such Cases; the Exposer took no­tice of it, yet hath not produced one place of Scripture, but onely made use of Force at an Invincible Reason; so that upon supposal, which none grant­ed [...]m, that all his Few do clearly demonstrate from Scripture, what is at best therefore but deducible from Scripture, she thinks it reasonable to ob­lige all men by force to come to all their Parishes. And yet he himself who does (I suppose it onely for the Cases sake) believe the Scripture, although he cannot produce one place of Scripture for using this force, and though the Author has produced so many, and urges the whole Scripture that such force is not to be used, hath his brains nevertheless so confused, or so ob­durate, that he cannot force himself to believe the Author: but persists in his unchristian and unreasonable desire that men may be compelled, and hereby deserves to be made an Example of his own Principle. For herein he exceeds Phara [...]h, who had ten sufficient Proposals, and yet his heart was so hardned, that he would not let Israel go out of Egypt, but was proof a­gainst Miracles. But He onely would imagine that the Israelites were idle, and would therefore force them to make Brick without Straw: but the Ex­posers heart and brains are so hardned, that he will conceive all the Non­conformists to be obstinate fools or hypocrits, and therefore will compel them all to go to all their Parish Churches, and to make therefore Faith without Reason. And hence it is not onely probable but demonstrable, if they were compelled to go and hear him and the Few of his Party, how well he or [Page] they would acquit themselves too, in clearly demonstrating from Sciprture the Prime Articles of Faith, as it is extended in all the Creeds, of which it was treated in this Chapter that I have now done with, and truly almost with those remaining.

For I had intended to have gone Chapter by Chapter, affixing a distinct Title, as he does to every one of them (that men may believe he has ani­madverted thorowly without reading) except that concerning the difference between Bishops and Presbyters, which, as being the most easie to be an­swered, he therefore referred to a Bishop. But in good earnest, after ha­ving confider'd this last Chapter, so Brutal whether as to Force or Reason, I have changed my resolution. For he argues so despicably in the rest; that even I, who am none of the best Disputers of this World, have conceiv'd an utter contempt for him. He is a meer Kitchin-plunderer, and attacks but the Baggage, where even the Suttlers would be too hard for him. P. 18. Does the Exposer allow that under Constantinus Pogonatus to have been a free General Council? In the same page, If the Exposer would have done any thing in his, Dic Ecclesiae, he should have proved that a General Council is the Church, that there can be such a General Council, or hath been; that the Church can impose new Articles of Faith beyond the Express Words of Scripture; that a General Council cannot erre in matters of Faith; That the Church of his making cannot erre in matters of Faith; Whereas our Church, Article 19. saith thus far, The Church of Je­rusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred, so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not onely in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith. This is an Induction from Particulars, and remark the Title of the Article, being of the Church, Ours defines it, The Visible Church of Christ is a Congregation of faithful men, in which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly ministred, according to Christs Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same. And then, if the Reader please to look on the 20. and 21. Articles following, one of the Authority of the Church, the other of the Authority of General Councils, unless a man will industriously mis-apply and mis-construe them, those three are a Compendious and irrefragable Answer, not onely to wh [...] he saith here upon the Appendix, but to his whole Book, from one end to the other, p. 19. I ask him when the Greek Church is excommunicate by the Roman, when the Protestants left the Roman Church, when we in Eng­land are neither Papists, Lutherans, nor Calvinists, and when in Queen Maries time we returned to the Roman Church, what and where then was the Catholick Church, that was indefectible and against which the Gates of Hell did not prevail? Was it not in the Savoy? Moreover I ask him what hinders but a General Council may erre in matters of Faith, when we in England, that are another World, that are under an Imperial Crown, that are none of them, as the Exposer words it, but have a distinct Catho­lick Faith within our Four Seas, did in the Reign before mentioned (and [Page 41] reckon how many in that Convocation those were that dissented) again make our selves one of them? unless he has a mind to do so too, which would alter the Case exceedingly. P. 20. He quotes the Act I Eliz. cap. I. let him mind that clause in it, by the express and plain words of Canonical Scripture▪ and then tell me what service it hath done him: whether he had not better have let it alone, but that it is his fate all along to be con­demn'd out of his own mouth, which must alwayes succeed so, when man urges a Real Truth against a Real Truth. P. 23. I have reason to affirm and he will meet with it (and has already in the Author) that those Gene­ral Councils howsoever called, were no Repraesentatio totius nominis Christia­ni, but nominally: yea that such a Representation could not be. P 22. He expounds Scriptures here, and thinks he does wonders in it, by assuming the Faculties of the whole Body to the Mouth, which Mouth, he saith (and in some sense 'tis very true, if a man would run over the Concor­dance) is the Clergy. But I know not why the Mouth of the Church should pretend to be the Brain of the Church, and understand and will for the whole Laity. Let every man have his word about, and 'tis reason. We are all at the same Ordinary, and pay our souls equally for the Reckoning. The Exposer's Mouth, which is unconscionable, would not onely have all the Meat but all the Talk too, not onely at Church, but at Council Table. Let him read Bishop Taylor of Liberty of Prophecy. P. 25 The Exposer, that alwayes falsly Represents his Adversary, as an Enemy to Creeds, to Fa­thers, (as afterwards he does to Ceremonies, to Logick, to Mathema­ticks, to every thing that he judiciously speaks and allows of) here. P. 25. saith the Author (who delivers but the Church of Englands Doctrine here­in, and would not have Divine Faith impos'd upon, nor things prest be­yond Scripture) in this matter of General Councils is guilty of unthought of Popery, for the Papists (really I think he partly slanders them herein) can­not endure Councils, General and Free. They allow many a General Coun­cil more than we do. If the Pope do not, for some reason or other, de­light in some that are past, or in having new ones; it does not follow that the Papists do not. I think those were Papists that ruffled the Pope too here in the West, and that at the Council of Constance burnt John Hus and Hierome of Prague, and resolv'd that Faith was not to be kept with Hereticks. But pray Mr. Exposer, if we must give divine Faith to Ge­neral Councils, let the Author ask you in his turn which are those Gene­ral Councils? How shall we know them? Why, onely such as accord with Scripture. Why, then we, I mean you Mr. Exposer, make our selves, you still, Judges of the General Councils, the fault you so much condemn the Author for. But what Popery, thought or unthought of, are you, in the very next line, guilty of, that call the Popes Supremacy the Quintessence of Popery? So that it seems the Quintessence of the Contro­versie betwixt ou [...] Church and theirs, is onely which shall be Pope: for the Articles of [...] [Page 42] compulsion, though the Non-conformists may. I thank you, Mr. Expo­ser, for your News: I had often heard it before, I confess, but till now I did never, and scarce yet can, believe it; it is rather to be wish'd then hoped for, a thing so surprizingly seasonable. But for the good news, Mr. Exposer, I will give you four Bottles (which is all I had by me, not for mine own use, but for a friend upon occasion) of the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Essence. But the Quintessence I doubt would be too strong for your Brain, especially in the morning when you are writing Ani­madversions. P. 28. of Ceremonies he sports unworthily, as if the Au­thor spoke Pro and Con, Contradictions: while, as a Moderator, he advi­ses our Church to Condescension on the right, and the Dissenters to sub­mission on the left (how are men else to be brought together?) He had as good call every man, because he has two hands, an Ambidexter. He would turn every mans Stomach, worse than the Singing-mens dirty Surpli­ces, to hear him defend it so foolishly. P. 29, 30, 35, 36. The best of his reasons for it are the Apparitions in white, in the Evangelists. The Trans­figuration. The Saints in white Linnen. The Purity of a Minister, Why then does he not wear it all the Week? The Bishop Sisynnius did so, and a Churchman asking him, why not in Black? as 'twas then the mode, he gave the same reasons; and I believe Gurnay the Non-conformist, if, as they say, he went to Market in it, learn'd them of him. Why does not the Exposer (there is more reason in Scripture. Col. 4 6. Let your speech be alwayes seasoned with Salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man) carry a Salt-box alwayes in his Pocket, to be tasting of? for I doubt he is of the Salt that has lost his savour: however I am sure he is very insi­p [...]d, and this might correct it: beside it must have been of great vertue, when he was to animadvert on the Naked Truth, that he might have known how to answer him. See Fox Vol. 3. p. 500. col. 2. what the Martyr, the Conformable Bishop Ridley saith, would not be forced to wear it, he was no Singer. See as to all these thing, his beloved Tertullian, de Cor. Mil. Si ideo dicatur Coronari licere, quia non prohibeat Scriptura, aequè retorquebitur, ideo Coronari non licere, quia Scriptura non jubeat. Bishop Chrysostome Or. 1. adversus Judaeos, Ostendite cos ex Dei sententi [...] jejunare Quod ni id fiat q [...]vis eb [...]ietate sceleratius est jejunium. Etenim contra-quod fit praeter Dei voluntatem est omnium p [...]ssimum. Non enim ipsa corum quae fiunt natura, sed Dei voluntas ac Decretum essicit ut eadem vel bona sint vel mala. P. 33. [...] jeering at the Authors Oh my Fathers, is inhumane and impious: but Ch the pity of it that twenty such Oh's will not amount to one Reason They will, Heb. 4. 12, 13. that day, which the Devils believe and tremble, when all things shall be naked and bare before the Word of Truth. P. 37. he is scarce pro­per to come in a Pulpit, after what he saith, that the Apostles received not the Sacrament sitting; much less after p. 41. he has said, We read that our Saviour kneeled in several places, much less after p. 59. where of preach­ing he saith, He knows not what the Author means by the Demonstration of [Page 43] the Spirit, unless to speak as he does, magisterially. He never read 1 Cor. 2. 4. of preaching in demonstration of the spirit, nor Mat. 7. 29. how Christ taught as one having authority; there is such an Art if he knew it. P. 42. he can never answer the Author upon Rom. 14. where the zeal us Observer of Ceremonies is the weak Brother. He whiffles, those were the Jewish Ceremo­nies. The Jews had a fairer pretence than we: for theirs were instituted by God himself, and they know not they were abrogate.

His intolerably ridiculous Story out of Scholtus p. 15. of contriving a pair of Organs of Cats, which he had done well to have made the Piggs at Hogs Norton play on, puts me in mind of another Story to quit it, relating as his does to screwing the Non-conformists into Church; and I could not possibly miss of the rencounter, because the Gentleman's name of whom it is told, is the Monosyllable voice with which Cats do usually address them­selves to us. 'Twas (you have it as I had it) the Vice-Chancellour of one of our Universities, but now a Bishop, Octob. 22. 1671. and 12. Febr. 1669, He came to a Fanaticks house, they not being then at Wor­ship, yet one of 'm said, They were come to pray to the God of Heaven and Earth; he said, Then they were within the Act. He wou'd force them to Church to Saint Maries, himself laid hands on'm. He commanded them to follow him in the Kings name. His Beadle told them, He would drive them thither in the Devils name. The Vice-Chancellour said he had converted hundreds so at Reading. They spoke of Queen Maries dayes, he said, he could burn them too now, if the Law required it. There was old tugging, he had the victory. They were placed in Saint Maries, with Beadles to attend them. As he carried them in he quoted Luke 14 23 Compel them to come in. What pity 'tis the Exposer knew not of this Text, that he might have had one Scripture for his Doctrine of Compulsion! But it chanced the Minister there preached one time Acts 5. 41. the other time Mat. 10. 16. Afterwards he took the penalty nevertheless for not having been at Church that same Sunday that he had hurried them thither. P. 62. He speaks of Bishop Morton, whose industrious Brain made up the fatal breach between the two Houses of York and Lancaster. Much good do the Clergy with their Lay Offices He coggs p. 7. with the Bishop of Ely for his short Syllo­gisme: he made a longer of the Holiness of Lent. He complements (I said he would not forget him) my Lord Chancellor the Christian Cicero. 'Tis true of him, but contradictorily exprest. Ps. 35. 16. With the flatterers were busy mockers, that gnashed with their teeth. The Exposer has com­menc'd in both Faculties. But the Printer calls: the Press is in danger. I am weary of such stuffe, both mine own and his. I will rather give him this following Essay of mine own to busie him, and let him take his turn of be­ing the Popilius.

A short Historical Essay, touching General Councils, Creeds, and Imposition in Religion.

THE Christian Religion, as first Instituted by our Blessed Saviour was the greatest security to Magistrates by the Obedience which it taught, and was fitted to enjoy no less security under them by a Practice conformable to that Doctrine. For our Saviour himself, not pretending to an Earthly Kingdom, took such care therefore to instruct his follow­ers in the due Subjection to Governours; that, while they observed his Precepts, they could neither fall under any Jealousy of State as an ambiti­ous and dangerous Party, nor as Malefactors upon any other account de­serve to suffer under the Publick Severity: So that in this only it could seem pernicious to Government that Christianity, if rightly exercised upon its own Principles, would render all Magistracy useless. But although he, who was Lord of all, and to whom all Power was given both in Heaven and in Earth, was nevertheless contented to come in the form of a Ser­vant, and to let the Emperours and Princes of the World alone with the use of their Dominions; he thought it good reason to retain his Religi­on under his own cognizance and exempt its Authority from their juris­diction. In this alone he was imperious, and did not only practise it him­self against the Laws and Customs then received, and in the face of the Ma­gistrate; but continually seasoned and hardened his Disciples in the same confidence and obstinacy. He tells them, They shall be brought before Kings and Governours for his name but fear them not, he will be with them, bear them out and justifie it against all Opposition. Not that he allowed them hereby to violate their duty to the Publick by any resistance in defi­ance of the Magistracy; but he instructed and animated them in their du­ty to God, in despight of Suffering.

In this manner Christianity did at first set out and accordingly found reception. For although our Blessed Saviour, having fulfilled all Righte­ousness and the time of his Ministery being compleated, did by his Death set the Seal to his Doctrine, and shew the way toward Life and Immor­tality to such as Believing imitate his Example: yet did not the Heatken Magistrate take the Government to be concerned in the point of Religion or upon that account consent to his Execution. Pontius Pilate, then Go­vernour of Judaea, though he were a man unjust and cruel by Nature, and served Tiberius, the most tender, jealous, and severe in point of State or Prerogative, of all the Romane Emperours; though he understood that great Multitudes followed him, and that he was grown the Head of a new Sect that was never before heard of in the Nation, yet did not be in­termeddle. But they were the men of Religion, the Chief-Priests, Scribes and Elders and the High-Priest Caiapkas. And yet, although they ac­cused him falsly, That he taught that Tribute was not to be given to Caesar [Page 45] that he was a Fifth Monarch and made himself a King, and (as it is usu­al for some of the Clergy to terrifie the inferiour Magistrates out of their duty to Justice under pretence of Loyalty to the Prince) threatned Pilate that if he let that man go he was not Caesars friend; he understanding that they did it out of Envy, and that the Justice and Innocence of our Saviour was what they could not bear with, would have adventured all their Informing at Court, and first have freed him and then have exchanged him for Barrabas; saying, that he found no fault in him: but he was overborne at last by humane weakness and poorly imagined that by washing his own hands he had expiated himself and wiped off the guilt upon those alone who were the occasion. But, as for Tiberius himself, the growth of Chri­stianity did never increase his cares of Empire at Rome, nor trouble his sleep at Capreae: but he both approved of the Doctrine, and threatned the Informers with Death; nor would have staid there, but attempted, according to the way of their Superstition, upon the intelligence he had from Pilate, to have received Christ into the number of their Deities. The Persecution of the Apostles after his Death, and the Martyrdome of Ste­phen happened not by the interposing of the Civil Magistrate in the mat­ter of Religion, or any disturbance occasioned by their Doctrines: but arose from the High-Priest and his emissaries, by suborned Witnesses, stirring up the rabble in a brutish and riotous manner to execute their cru­elty. How would the modern Clergy have taken and represented it, had they lived in the time of St. John Baptist and seen Jerusalem, Judaea and all the Region round about Jordan go out to be baptized by him! Yet that Herod, for any thing we read in Scripture, though he wanted not his in­stillers, apprehended no Commotion: and had not Calig [...]la banished him and his Herodias together, might in all appearance have lived without any change of Government. 'Twas she that caused John's Imprisonment for the convenience of her Incest, Herod indeed seared him, but rather reve­renced him, as a just man, and an holy, observed him and when he heard him he did many things and heard him gladly. Nor could all her subtilty have ta­ken off his Head, but that Herod thought himself under the obligations of a Dance and an Oath, and knew not in that Case they ought both to be dispensed with. But he was exceeding sorry at his death, which few Prin­ces are if men have lived to their jealousie or danger. The Killing of James and Imprisonment of Peter by that other Herod was because he saw he pleased the people; when the Priests had once set them on madding: a Complai­sance to which the most innocent may be exposed, but which partakes more of guile than Civility or Wisdome.

But, to find out what the disinteressed and prudentmen of those dayes took to be the wisest and only justisiable way for the Magistrate to pro­ceed in upon matters of Religion, I cannot see any thing more pregnant than the concurrent Judgment of three Persons, of so different Characters, and that lived so far a sunder, that there can be no danger of their having [Page 46] corrupted one anothers Understanding in favour to Christianity. Ga­maliel, the Deputy of Achaia, and the Town clerk of Ephesus; The first a Jewish Doctor, by Sect a Pharisee, one of the Council, and of great Authority with the People, who (when the Chief-Priest had cast the Apo­stles in Prison, and charged them for Preaching against the Command he had before laid upon them) yet gave this advice, confirming it with se­veral fresh precedents, Acts 5. That they should take keed to themselves what they intended to do with those men and let them alone, for if this coun­sel, saith he, or this work be of men, it will come to nought, but if it be of God you cannot overthrow it, lest ye be found fighting with God. So that his Opi­nion grounded upon his best experience, was that the otherwise unblame­able Sect of Christianity might safely and ought to be left to stand or fall by Gods Providence under a free Toleration of the Magistrate. The Second was Gallio, Acts 18. A Roman, and Deputy of Achaia. The Jews at Corinth hurried Paul before his Tribunal, laying the usual charge against him. That he perswaded men to Worship God contrary to the Law: which Gallio looked upon as so slight and without his Cognizance, that, although most Judges are willing to increase the jurisdiction of their Courts, He drave them away, saving Paul the labour of a defence, and told them, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewdness▪ reason would that he should bear with them, but if it be a question of words and names and of your law, look ye to it I will be no judge of such matters: and when he had so said, Paul was released, but the Greeks that were present took Barrabas, and be­fore the Judgment Seat beat So [...]henes the Chief Ruler of the Synagogue, and Ring leader of the Accusers. His Judgment therefore was that, to punish Christians meerly for their Doctrine and Practise, unless they were Malefactors otherwise, was a thing out of the Magistrates Province and al­together unreasonable. The Third case was no less remarkable. For one Demetrius, that was a Silver-smith by trade and made shrines for Diana, stirred up all the Free men of his Company against Paul, and indeed he stated the matter very fairly and honestly, assigning the true Reason of most of these Persecutions: Ye know that by this craft we have our wealth, but that by Pauls Preaching that they be no Gods which are made with hands, not only our Craft is in danger to be set at naught, but also the Temple of the great Goddess and her Magnificence, whom all Asia and the World Wor­ship, should be despised and destroyed. And it is considerable that even the Jews, though of a contrary Religion yet, fomented, as it usually chances, this difference and egg'd the Ephesians on against the Apostle and his fol­lowers. But when they had brought Alexander, one of Paul's Compani­ons into the Theatre, the Recorder of Ephesus (more temperate and wise than some would have been in that Office) would not make any Inquisi­tion upon the matter, nor put Alexander upon his tryal and defence, but, (although he himself could not have born that Office without being a great Dianist, as he declared too in his discourse) he tells the People, They [Page 47] had brought those men which were neither robbers of Churches nor Blasphemers of their Goddess, (for that Judge would not Condemn men by any infe­rences or expositions of old Statutes which long after was Julian's practice and since imitated) and therefore if Demetrius and his Crafts-men had any matter against them the Law was open, and it should be determined in a Lawful Assembly, but that the whole City was in danger to be called in questi­on for that uproar, there being no cause whereby they might give account of that concourse. And by this he plainly enough signified, that if Paul and his Companions had stoln the Church-Plate they might well be i [...]ed, but that Demetrius had no more reason in Law against them, then a Chan­dler might have had, if by Paul's Preaching Wax tapers, as well as Silver-Candlesticks had grown out of fashion. That it is matter of right and wrong betwixt man and man that the Justice of Government lookes too: but that, while Christianity was according to its own Principle carried on quietly, it might so fall that the disturbers of it were guilty of a Riot and their great City of Ephesus deserve to be fin'd for't. And taking this to have been so, he dismist the Assembly, Acts 19.

After these Testimonies which I have collected out of the History of the Acts, as of greatest Authority, I shall only add one or two more out of the same Book, wherein Paul likewise was concern'd before Heathen Ma­gistrates of greater eminence, Acts 23. Ananias the High Priest (these al­wayes were the men) having countenanc'd and instigated the Jews to a Con­spiracy, in which Paul's Life was indanger'd and aim'd at Lysias the chief Captain of Jerusalem interposes and sends him away to Foelix then Gover­nour of Judaea; signifying by Letter That he had been accused only of questi­ons of their Law, but he found nothing to be said to his Charge wor­thy of Death or of Bonds. Whereof Foelix also, though the High-Priest was so zealous in the Prosecution that he took the journey on purpose, and had instructed an exquisite Orator Tertullus to harangue Paul out of his Life, as a Pestilent-fellow, a mover of Sedition and Ring-leader of the Sect of the Nazarenes, not omitting even to charge Lysias for rescuing him by great violence from being Murdered by them, was so well satisfied of the contra­ry upon full hearing, that he gave him his Libery and a Centurion for his guard, with command that none of his acquaintance should be debarr'd from comming and Ministring to him. But being indeed to leave his Government afterwards; left him in Prison, partly to shew the Jews and their High-Priest another piece of complaisant Policy, which; 'tis possible they paid well for, seeing the other reason was, because though he had sent for Paul the oftner and communed with him, in hopes that he would have given him money to be discharged, there came nothing of it. Which was so base a thing in so great a Minister, that the meanest Justice of the Peace in England would scarce have the face to do so upon the like occasion. But his Successor F [...]stus, having called Agrippa and Berenice to hear the Cause, they and three were of Opinion that 'twas all on the Jews side calumny and impertinence, but [Page 48] that Paul had done nothing worthy of death or of Bonds, and might have been set free but that having appeal'd to Caesar he must be transmitted to him in safe Custody. Such was the sense of those upon whom the Emperors then relyed for the Government and security of their Provinces: and so gross were their Heathen understandings, that they could not yet comprehend how quietness was Sedition, or the innocence of the Christian Worship could be subject to forfeiture or penalty. Nay, when Paul appear'd even before Nero himself and had none to stand by him but all forsock him: he was by that Emperor acquitted, and permitted a long time to follow the work of his Ministry. 'Tis true that afterwards this Nero had the honour to be the First of the Roman Emperors that Persecuted Christianity; whence it is that Tertullian in his Apologetick saith; We glory in having such an one the first beginner and Author of our punishment, for there is none that hath read of him, but must understand some great good to have been in that Doctrine, otherwise Nero would not have Condemned it.

And thence forward Christianity for about Three hundred Years lay sub­ject to Persecution. For the Gentile Priests could not but observe a great decay in their Parishes, a neglect of their Sacrifices and diminution of their Profits by the daily and visible increase of that Religion. And God in his wise Providence had so ordered that, as the Jews already so, the Heathens now having fill'd up their measure with iniquity, Sprinkling the Blood of his Saints among their Sacrifices, and the Christians having in a severe Apprentiship of so many Ages Learned the Trade of Suffering, they should at last be their own Masters and admitted to their Freedom. Nei­ther yet, even in those times when they lay exposed to Persecution, were they without some Intervalls and catching seasons of Tranquility, where­in the Churches had leisure to reap considerable advantage, and the Clergy too might have been inured, as they had been Exemplary under Affliction so, to bear themselves like Christians when they should arrive at a full prospe­rity. For as oft as there came a just Heathen Emperour and a lover of Mankind, that either himself observed, or understood by the Go­vernours of his Provinces, the innocence of their Religion and Pra­ctices, their readiness to pay Tribute, their Prayers for his Government and Person, their faithful Service in his Wars, but their Christian va­lour and contumacy to Death, under the most exquisite Torments, for their holy profession; he forthwith relented, he rebated the Sword of the Executioner, and could not find in his heart or in his power to excercise it a­gainst the exercise of that Religion. It being demonstrable that a Religion in­stituted upon Justice betwixt man and man. Love to one another, yea even their Enemies, Obedience to the Magistrate in all Humane and Moral Mat­ters, and in Divine Worship upon a constant exercise thereof and as constant Suffering in that Cause, without any pretence or latitude for Resistance, can­not, so long as it is true o it self in these things, fall within the Magistrates Jurisdiction.

[Page 49] But as it first was planted without the Magistrates hand, and the more they pluck'd at it, so much the more still it flouricted, so it would be to the end of the world, and whensoever Governors have a mind to try for it, it will by the same means and method sooner or later foil them, but, if they have a mind to pull up that Mandrake it were adviseable for them not to do it themselves, but to chuse out a Dog for the Imployment. I confess whensoever a Christian transgresseth these bounds once, he is impoundable or like a wafe and stray whom Christ knows not, he falls to the Lord of the Mannor. But otherwise he cannot suffer, he is invulnerable by the sword of Justice: only a man may swear and damn himself to kill the first honest man he meets, which hath been, and is the case of all true Christians worshiping God under the power and violence of their Persecutors.

But the Truth is that, even in thosetimes which some men now, as oft as it is for their advantage, do consecrate under the name of Primitive, the Christi­ans were become guilty of their own punishment, and had it not been, as is most usual, that the more Sincere Professors suffered promiscuously for the Sins and Crimes of those that were Carnal and Hypocrites, their Persecutors may be look'd upon as having been the due Administrators of God's Justice. For (not to go deeper) if we consider that which is reckoned the Tenth Perse­cution under Dioclesian, so incorrigable were they after nine preceding, what other could be expected when Eusebius l. 3. c. 1. sadly laments having relat­ed how before that the Christians lived in great trust and reputation in Court, the Bishops of each Church were beloved, esteem'd and reverenced by all mankind and by the Presidents of the Provinces, the Meetings in all the Cities were so many and numerous, that it was necessary and allow'd them to erect in every one spacious and goodly Churches, all things went on prosperously with them, and to such an height that no envious man could disturb them, no Divel could hurt them, as long as walk­ing yet worthy of those mercies they were under the Almighty's cure and pro­tection: after that our affair by that too much Liberty, degenerated into Luxury and Laziness, and some prosecuted others with Hatred, Contumely, and almost all of us wounded our selves with the weapons of the Tongue in ill language when Bishops set upon Bishops, and the people that belonged to one of them stirred Sedi­tion against the people of another; then horrible Hypocrisy and Dissimulation sprung up to the utmost extremity of Malice, and the Judgement of God, while yet there was liberty to meet in the Congregations, did sensibly and by steps begin to visit us, the Persecution at first discharging it self upon our Brethren that were in the Army. But having no feeling of the hand of God, not indeavouring to make our peace with him, and living as if we believed that God did neither take notice of our Trans­gressions nor would visit us for them, we heaped up Iniquity upon Iniquity. And those which seemed to be our Pastors, kicking under foot the rules of Piety, were in­flamed among themselves with mutual Contentions, and while they minded no­thing else but to exaggetate their Quarrells, Threats, Emulation. Hatred and Enemies, and earnestly each of them pursued his particular Ambition in a Tyran­nical manner, then indeed the Lord, then I say, according to the voice of the Pro­phet [Page 50] J [...]emy, he covered the Daughter of Zion with a cloud of his anger, and [...] down from Heaven unto earth the beauty of Israel; and remembred not his foot­stool in the day of his anger. And so the Pious Historian Pathetically goes on, and deplores the Calamities that [...], to the loss of all that stock of Re­putation, Advantage, Liberty and Safely, which Cristian people had by true Piety and adhering strictly to the Rules of their Profession formerly ac­quired and injoyned, but had now forfeited and smarted deservedly under Dioclesian's persecution. And it was a severe one, the longest too that ever happened, ten years from his beginning of it and continued by others: by which [...] one might have thought the Church would have been sufficiently winnowed, and nothing left but the pure Wheat, whereas it proved quite contrary, and the holiest and most constant of the Christians bing blown away by Martyrdom, it seem'd by the succeeding times as if nothing but the Chaff and the Ta [...]es remained. But there was yet such a Seed le [...], and not­withstanding the defection of many, so internal a virtue in the Religion it self, that Dioclesian could no longer stand against it, and tired out in two years time, was glad to betake himself from rooting out Christianity, to gardening and to sow Pot-herbs at Salona. And he with his partner Maximi [...]s, resigned the Empire [...] Galer [...]s and Constan [...], the excellent Father of a more glorious and Christian Son, Constantine the G [...]a, who in due season succeeded him, and by a chain of Gods extraordinary providences seemed to have been [...] down from Heaven to be Emperor of the whole World, and as I may say, the Universal Apostle of Christianity.

It is [...] pressible the virtue of that Prince, his Care, his Indulgence, his Litera [...]y his own Example, every thing that could possibly tend to the pro­motion and incouragement of true Religion and Piety. And in order to that he though [...] not do better▪ neither indeed could he, then to shew a, [...] respect o [...] the Clergy and Bishops, providing largely for their sub­sistence and they too on their part behaved themselves worthy of their High [...] are known to make right use of the advantages of his Bounty to the same ends that they were by him intended. For if the Apostle [...] Tim. 5. 17. re [...]uires that an Elder, provided he rule well, be accounted worthy of Double Honor, especially those who lab [...]ing in the Word and Doctrine, it excludes not a [...] any further proportion, and indeed these cannot be too high a value [...] upon such a Pe [...]son: and God forbid too that any measure of wealth should render a Clergy man Uncanonical. But alas, Bishops were al­ready grown another Name and Thing, then at the Apostles Institution; and had so [...] their [...], that Paul would have had much difficulty by all the marks in the [...] Tim. [...]. to have known them. They were ill enough under persecution many of them, but that long and sharp Winter under Dio­clesian, being seconded by so warm a Summer under Constantine, produced a Pestilence, which as an Infection that seizes sometimes only one sort of [...] ▪ Diffused it self [...] remarkably thorow the whole body of the Clergy. From his reign the most sober Historians date that New Disease which was so [Page 51] generally propagated then, and ever since transmitted to some of their Suc­cessors, that it hath given reason to inquire whether it only happened to those men as it might to others, or where not inherent to the very Function. It show'd it self first in ambition, then in Contention, next in Imposition, and after these Symptoms broke out at last like a Plague-Sore in open Perse­cution. They the Bishops who began to vouch themselves the Successors of Christ, or at least of his Apostles, yet pretended to be H [...]irs and Executors of the Jewish Hiah-Priests and the Heathen Tyrants, and were ready to move the Will. The Ignorant Jews and Infidels understood not how to Per­secute, had no Commission to meddle with Religion, but the Bishops had studied the Scriptures, knew better things, and the same, which was Cruelty and Tyranny in the Heathens, if done by a Christian and Ecclesiastical hand, was hallowe [...] to be Church-Government and the care of a Diocess. But that I may not seem to speak without book or out-run the History, I shall return to proceed by those degrees I newly mention'd whereby the Christian Reli­gion was usurped upon, and those things became their crime which were their duties.

The first was the Ambition of the Bishops, which had even before this taken its rise when in the intervals of the former Persecutions the Piety of the Christians had laid out ample provisions for the Chuch, but when Constantine not only restored those which had been all [...] under Dioclesian, but was every day adding some new Possession, Priviledge, or Honor, a Bishop­rick became very [...], and was not only a Good Work but a Good Thing, especially when there was now no danger of paying as it was usual, formerly their First-fruits to the Emperor by Martyrdom. The Arts by which Ambi­tion c [...]mes, are Calumny, Dissimulation, Cruelty, Bribery, Adulation, all ap­plyed in their proper places and seasons; and when the man hath attained his end he ordinarily shows himself then in his colours, in Pride, Opiniastry, Contention, and all other requisite or incident il Qualities. And if the Clergy of those times had some more dextrous and innocent way then this of mana­ing their Ambition, it is to be lamented inter Artes [...], or lyes envious­ly hid by some musty Book-worm in his private Liberary. But so much I find that both before and then and after, they cast such Crimes at one another, that a Man would scarce think he were reading an History of Bishops, but a Legend of Divels: and each took such are to blacken his adversary, and he regarded not how he smutted himself thereby and his own Order, to the Laughter or Horror of the by-standers. And one thing I remark particularly, that as Son of a Whore is the modern Word of Reproach among the Laity, of the same use then among the Clergy was Heretick. There were indeed Hereticks as well as there are Bastards, and perhaps it was not their fault, (neither of [...] could help it) but the Mothers o [...] the Fathers, but they made so many Here­ticks in [...] days, that [...] hard to think they really believ'd them so; but ad­ventur'd the Name only to pick a Quarrel And one thing that makes it very sus­picious, is, that in the Ecclesiastical History the Ring-leaders of any Heresy [Page 52] for the most part accused of having a mind to be a Bishop, though it was not the way to come to it. As here was the damnable Heresy of the Novatians, against which Constantine, not withstanding his Declaration of general Indul­gence at his coming in, was shortly after so incensed, that he published a most severe Proclamation against them; Cognoscite jam per legem hanc que in me sancita [...] O Nova iam &c. prohibiting all their meetings, not only in Publick but in their own Private Houses, and that all such places where they assembled for their worship, should be rased to the ground without delay or controversie, &c. Eus. l. 3. c. 62. de vita Constantini. Now the story the Bishops tell of Novatus the Author of that Sect. Euseb. l. 6. c. 24. is in the words of Cornelius the Bishop of Rome, the very first line. But that you may know that this brave Novatus did even before that affect to be a Bishop (a great crime in him) that he might conceal that petulant Ambition, he for a better cover to his arrogance, had got some Confessors into his Society, &c. and goes on cal­ling him all to naught, but then, saith he, be came with two Reprobates of his own Heresy into a [...]uite, the very least, Shire of Italy and by their means seduc­ed three most simple high shoon Bishops, wheedling them that they must with all speed go to Rome and there meeting with other Bishops all Matters should be recon­ciled. And when he had got thither these three Silly Fellows, as I said, that were not aware of his cunning, he had prepared a company of Rogues like Himself, that treated them in a private room very freely, and having thwack'd their bellies and heads full with meat and drink, compell'd the poor drunken Bishops by an ima­ginary and vain Imposition of Hands, to make Novatus also a Bishop. Might not one of the same Order now better have conceal'd these things had they been true, but such was the discretion. Then he tells that one of the three returned soon after, repenting it seems next morning, and so he received him again in­to the Church unto the Laick Communion. But for the other two he had sent Successors into their places. And yet after all this ado, and the whetting of Constantine, contrary to his own Nature and his own Declarations against the Navatians, I cannot find their Heresy to have been other then that they were the Puritans of those times, and a sort of Non-conformists that could have subscribed to the Six and thirty Articles, but differed only in those of Discipline: and upon some inormities therein separated, and (which will always be sufficient to quality an Heretick) they instituted, Bishops of their own in most places. And yet afterwards in the times of the best Homotusian Emperors, a sober and strictly Religious People did so constantly adhere to them, that the Bishops of the Church too found meet to give them fair quarter; for as much as they differ'd not in Fundamentals, and therefore were of use to them against Hereticks that were more dangerous and diametrically op­posite to the Religion. Nay in so much, that even the Bishop of Constantinople, yea of Rome, not withstanding that most tender point and interest of Epis­copacy, suffered the Novatian Bishops to walk cheek by joul with them in their own Diocess; until that, as Secr. l. 7. c. 11. the Roman Episcopacy having as it were passed the bounds of Priesthood, slipp'd into a Secular Princi­pality, [Page 53] and thenceforward the Roman Bishops would not suffer their Meetings with Security, but, though they commended them for their Consent in the some Faith with them, yet took away all their Estates. But at Constantinople they con­tinued to fare better, the Bishops of that Church embracing Novatians and free liberty to keep their Conventicles in their Churches. What, and to have their Bishops too, Altar against Altar? A Condescention which as our Non-conformists seem not to desire or think of, so the Wisdom of these times would, I suppose, judge to be very unreasonable, but rather that it were fit to take the other course, and that whatsoever advantage the Religion might probably receive from their Doctrine and party, 'tis better to sup­press them, and make havock both of their Estates and Persons. But how­ever the Hereticks in Constantine's time had the less reason to complain of ill Measure, seeing it was that the Bishops meated by among themselves. I pass over that controversy betwixt Cecilianns, the Bishop of Carthage and his adherents, with another set of Bishops there in Africk, upon which Constantine ordered ten of each party to appear before Mil [...]iades the Bishop of Rome and others to have it deceived. Yet after they had given sentence, Constantine found it necessary to have a Council for a review of the business, as in his Letter to Chrestus the Bishop of Syracusa, Euseb. l. 10. c. 6. Wrens­as several have formerly separated from the Catholick Heresy, (for that word was not yet so ill natured but that it might sometimes be used in its proper and good Sense:) and then relates his Commission to the Bishop of Rome and others; But for as much as some having been careless of their own salvation, and forgetting the reverence due to that most holy Heresy (again) will not yet lay down their enmity, nor admit the sentence that hath been given, obstinately af­firming that they were but a few that pronounced the Sentence, and that they did it very precipitately, before they bad duly inquired of the matter: and from hence it hath happened that both they who ought to have kept a brotherly and nuanimous agreement together, do abominably any flagitiously dissent from one another, and such whose minds are alienated from the most holy Religion, do make a mockery both of it and them. Therefore 1, &c. have commanded very many Bishops out of innumerable places to meet at Arles, that what ought to have been quiet­ed upon the former Sentence pronounced, may now at least be determined, &c. and you to be one of them, and therefore I have ordered the Prefect of Sici­ly to furnish you with one of the publick Stage-Coachers and so many Ser­vants &c.

Such was the use then of Stage Coaches, Post Horses, and Councills, to the great disappointment and grievance of the many: both Men and Horses and Leather being hackneyd-jaded and worn out upon the errand of some contentious and obstinate Bishop, So went the Affairs hitherto, and thus well disposed and prepared were the Bishops to receive the Holy Ghost a se­cond time at the great and first general Council of Nice, which is so much Celebrated.

[Page 54] The occasions of calling it were two. The first a most important question in which the Wit and Piety of their Predecessors and now their successively had been much exercised and taken up: that was upon what day they ought to keep Easter, which though it were no point of Faith that it should be kept at all, yet the very calendiny of it was controverted with the same zeal, and made as heavy a do in the Church as if both parties had been Hereticks. And it is reckoned by the Church Historians as one of the chie [...] felicities of Con­stantines Empire to have quieted in that Councel this main controvesie. The second cause of the assembling them here was in seed grown, as the Bishop had ordered it, a matter of the greatest weight and consequence to the Christian Religion, one Arrius having as is related, to the disturbance of the Church, started a most pernicious opinion in the point of the Trinity. Therefore from all parts of the Empire they met together at the City of Nice, two hundred and fifty Bishops, and better, saith Eusebius, a goodly company, three hundred and eighteen say others, and the Animadverter too, with that pithy remark, pa. 23. Equal almost to the number of servants bred up in the b [...]se of Abraham. The Emperour had accommodated them every where with the posts, or layd Horses all along for the convenience of their journey thither, and all the time they were [...]heir supplyed them abundantly with all sorts of pro­vision at his own charges. And when they were all first assembled in Council, in the great Hall of the Imperial Palace, he came in having put on his best clothes to make his guests welcome; and saluted with that profound humility as if they all had been Emperour, nor would sit down in his Throne, no it was a very little and low stool, till they had all beckoned and made signes to him to sit down. No wonder if the first Council of Nice run in their heads ever after, and the ambitious Clergy, like those who have been long a thirst, took so much of Constantinus kindness, that they are scarce come to them­selves again after so many Ages. The first thing was that he acquainted them with the causes of his summoning them thither, and in a grave and most Chri­stian discourse exhorted them (to keep the peace or) to a good agreement as there was reason. For (saith Ruffin L. 1. c. 2. the Bishops being meet here almost of all parts, and as they use to do, bringing their quarrels about several matters along with them, every of them was at the Emperour, offering him Petitions, laying out one anothers faults, (for all the good advice he had given them) and were more [...]tent upon these things then upon the business they were sent for. But he, considering that by these scoldings and Bickerings the main affair was frustrated, appointed a set­day by which all the Bishops should bring him in whatsoever complaint they had a­gainst one another. And they being all brought, he made them that high Asiatick complement ▪ God hath made you Priests, and hath given you power to judge me, and therefore it is in you to judge me righteously, But you cannot be judged by any men. It is God only can judge you, and therefore reserve all your quarrels to his Tri­bunal. For you are as Gods to me, and it is not convenient a man should judge of Gods, but he only of whom it is written, God sta [...]deth in the Congregation of the Gods, and discerneth in the midst of them. And therefore setting these things [Page 55] aside, apply your minds without any contention to the concernments of God's Religi­on. And so without opening or reading one Petition commanded t [...]m all together to be burnt there in his presence. An action of great Charity and excellent Wis­dom, had but some of the words been spared. For doubtless, though they that would have complained of their brethren, grumbled a little; yet those that were accusable were all very well satisfied: and those expressions, you can judge me righteously, and you cannot be judged by any man, and God only can judge you. You are Gods to me, &c. were so extreamly sweet to some of the Bishops palats, that they believ'd it, and could never think of them afterwards▪ but their teeth wa [...]ered▪ and they ruminated so long on them that Constanti­ne's Successors came too late to repent it. But now the Bishops, having mist of their great end of quarrelling one with another, betake themselves though somwhat aukwardly to business. And it is necessary to mind, that as shortly as possible for the understanding of it, I give a curiory account of Alexander and Arrius, with some few others that were the most interessed in that gene­ral and first great revolution of Ecclesiastical affairs, since the dayes of the A­postles. This Alexander was the Bishop of Alexandria, and appears to have been a pious old Man, but not equally prudent, nor in Divine things of the most capable, nor in conducting the affairs of the Church, very dextrous; but he was the Bishop. This Character that I have given of him, I am the more confirmed in from some passages that follow, and all of them pertinent to the matter before me. They were used Sozom l. 2. c. 16. at Alexandria to keep yearly a solemn Festival to the memory of Peter one of their former Bishops, upon the same day he suffered. Martyrdom, which Alexander having Cele­brated at the Church with publick Devotion, was sitting after at home ex­pecting some guests to dine with him, Sozom. l. 2. c. 16. As he was alone and looking towards the Sea side he saw a pri [...]y way of the Boys upon the beach, at an old Recreation, imitating it seems the Rites of the Church and office of the Bishops, and was much delighted with the sigh [...] [...]s long as it appear'd an innocent and harmless representation: but when [...] them at last how they acted, the very administration of the Sacre [...] Mysteries, he was much troubled, and sending for some of the chief of his Clergy, caused the Boys to be taken and brought before him. He asked them particularly what kind of sport they had been at, and what the words, and what the actions were that they had used in it. After their fear had hindred them a while from answer­ing, and now they were afraid of being silent, they con [...]essed that a Lad of of their play-fellows, one Athanasius, had baptized some of them that were not yet initiated in those Sacred Mysteries: Whereupon Alexander inquired the more accurately what the Bishop of the game had said, and what he did to the boyes he had baptized, what they also had answered or learned from him▪ At last, when Alexander perceiv'd by them that his Pawn Bishop had made all his removes right; and that the whole Ecclesiastical Order and Rites had been duely observed in their interlude, he by the advice of his Priests a­bout him approved of that Mo [...]k Baptism and determined that the boys, be­ing [Page 56] once in the simplicity of their minds dipped in the Divine Grace, ought not to be Re-baptized, but he perfected it with the remaining Mysteries, which it is on­ly lawful for the Priests to administer. And then he delivered Athanasius and the rest of the boyes that had acted the parts of Presbyters and Deacons to their Parents calling God to witness that they should be educated in the Mini­stery of the Church, that they might pass their lives in that calling which they had chosen by imitation. But as for Athanasius, in a short while after Alex­ander took him to live with him and be his Secretary, having caused him to be carefully educated in the Schools of the best Grammarians and [...]hetoricians: and he grew in the opinion of all that spoke with him a discreet and eloquent person, and will give occasion to be more then once mentioned again in this Discourse, I have translated this in a manner word for word from the Au­thor. This good natured old Bishop Alexander that was so far from Ana­themising, that he did not so much as whip the boyes for profanation of the Sacrament against the Discipline of the Church, but without more doing, le [...] them, for ought I see, at liberty to regenerate as many more Lads upon the next Holyday as they thought convenient: He Socr. l c. 3. being a man that lived an easy and gentle life, had one day called his Friests and the rest of his Clergy together, and fell on Philosophying divinely among them, but somthing more subtly and curiously (though I dare say he meant no harm) then was usual, concerning the Holy Trin [...]ty. Among the rest, one Arrius a Priest too of Alexandria was there present, a Man who is described to be a good Disputant, and others add, (the Capital accusation of those times) that he had a mind to have been a Bishop and bore a great pique at Alexander, for he having been preferr'd before him to the See of Alexandria: but more are silent of any such matter, and Soz m l. 1. c. 14. saith he was in a great esteem with his Bishop. But Arrius Socr. l. 1. c. 3. hearing her discourse about the Holy Trinity and the Unity in the Trinity conceiv'd that, as the Bishop stated it, he had reason to suspect he was introducing afresh into the Church the Heresy of Sabellius the African who Fate­ [...]atur unum esse Deum & eta in unam essentiam Trinitatem adducebat, ut assere­ret in nullam esse vere subjectam proprietatem personis, sed nomina maturi pro eo at­que usus poscant, ut nunc de illo ut patre, nunc ut filio, nunc ut spiritu sancto dis­seratur: and thereupon it seems Arrius argued warmly for that opinion which was directly contrary to the Africane, driving the Bishop from one to a second, from a second to a third, seeming absurdity; which I studiously avoid the relation of, that in all these things I may not give occasion for Mens un­derstandings to work by their memories, and propogate the same errors by the same means they were first occasion'd. But hereby Arrius was himself blamed as the maintainer of those absurdities which he affixed to the Bishops opinion, as is usual in the heat and wrangle of Disputation. Whereas Truth for the most part lyes in the middle, but men ordinarily seek for it in the ex­tremities. Nor can I wonder that those ages were so fertile in what they called Heresies, when being given to meddling with the Mysteries of Religion fur­ther then humane apprehension or divine revelation did or could lead them, [Page 57] some of the Bishops were so ignorant and gross, but others so speculative, acute and refining in their conceptions, that, there being moreover a good fa [...]t Bishoprick to boot in the case, it is rather admirable to me how all the Clergy from one end to tother, could escape from being or being accounted Hereticks. Alexander hereupon Soz. l. 1. c. 140. instead of stilling by more prudent Me­thods this new Controversy, took, doubtless with a very good intention, a course that hath seldom been successful: makes himself judg of that wherein he had first been the Party, and calling to him some others of his Clergy, would needs sit in publick to have a solemn set Disputation about the whole Matter. And while Arrius was at it Tooth and Nail against his opposers, and the Ar­guments flew so thick that they darkned the Air, and no Man could yet judg which side should have the victory; the good Bishop for his part sate hay now hay, neither could tell in his Conscience of a long time which had the better of it; but sometimes he lean'd on one side and then on the other, and now in­couraged and commended those of one party, and presently the contrary, but at last by his own weight he cast the Scales against Arrius. And from thence forward he excommunicating Arrius for obstinacy, and Arrius writing in be­half and his followers to the Bishops, each one stating his own and his adver­saries case with the usual candor of such men in such Matters; the Bishops too all over began to divide upon it, and after them their people. Insomuch that Constantine out of a true paternal Sense and care, found necessary to send a ve­ry prudent and eminent Person to Alexandria, to try if he could accommodate the matter, giving him a Letter to Alexander and Arrius; how discreet, how Christian-like, I never read any thing of that nature equal to it! It is too long for me here to insert, but I gladly recommend my Reader to it in the 20 Eus. de vitâ Const. c. 67. where he begins I understand the foundation of the contro­versy to have been this, that thou Alexander didst inquire of thy Priests con­cerning a passage in the Scripture, nay didst ask them concerning a frivolous quil­let of a question what was each of their opinions: and thou Arrius didst inconsi­derately babble what thou neither at the beginning couldst conceive, and if thou hadst conceived so, oughtst not to have vented, &c.

But the Clergy having got this once in the wind, there was no beating them off the scent. Which induced Constantine to think the convening of this Coun­cil the only remedy to these Disorders. And a woful ado he had with them when they were met to manage and keep them in any tolerable decorum. It seemed like an Ecclesiastical Cock-pit, and a man might have laid wagers either way: the two parties contending in good earnest either for the truth or the vi­ctory, but the more unconcerned, like cunning Betters, sate judiciously hedg­ing, and so ordered their matters that which side soever prevail'd, they would be sure to be the Winners. They were indeed a most venerable Assembly, com­posed of some holy, some grave, some wise, and some of them learned Per­sons: and Constantine had so charitably burnt the accusations they intended a­gainst one another, which might otherwise have depopulated and dispirited the Council, that all of them may be presumed in one or other respect to have made [Page 58] a great Character. But I observe Soz. l. 1. c. 16. that these great Bishops, al­though they only had the decisive voices, yet thought fit to bring along with them certain men that were cunning at an Argument, to be auxiliary to them when it came to hard and tough Disputation; beside that they had their Priests and Deacons ready at a dead lift always to assist them: So that their understand­ings seem'd to be sequester'd, and for their dayly Faith, they depended upon what their Chaplains would allow them. And in that quality Athanasius there waited upon Alexander, being his Deacon, (for as yet it seems Arch-bishops nor Arch-deacons were invented.) And it is not improbable that Athanasius having so early personated the Bishop, and seeing the declining age of Alex­ander, would be careful that Arrius should not step betwixt him and home up­on vacancy, but did his best against him to barr up his way, as it shortly after happened; Athanasius succeeding after the Council in the See of Alexandria. In the mean time you may imagine that Hypostasis, Persona, Substantia, Sub­sistentia, Essentia, Coessentialis, Consubstantialis, Ante saecula Coaeter­nus, &c. were by so many disputants pick'd to the very bones, and those too broken afterwards to come to the marrow of Divinity. And never had Con­stantine in his life so hard a task as to bring them to any rational results: meck­ly and patiently, Euseb. L. 3. c. 13. de vitâ Const. list'ning to every one, taking each Man's opinion and without the acrimony with which it was delivered, help­ing each party where they disagreed, reconciling them by degrees when they were in the fiercest Contention, conferring with them a part courteously and mildly, tel­ling them what was his own opinion of the matter: Which though some excep­tious persons may alleadge to have been against the nature of a Free Council, yet truly unless he had taken that course, I cannot imagine how possibly he could ever have brought them to any conclusion. And thus this first, great, Gene­ral Council of Nice, with which the world had gone big so long, and which look'd so big upon all Christendom, at last was brought in bed, and after a very hard labor deliver'd of Homoousios.

They all subscribed to the New Creed, except some seventeen, who it seems had rather to be Hereticks then Bishops. For now the Anathema's were pub­lished, and whoever held the contrary was to be punish'd by Deprivation and Banishment, all Arrian books to be burned, and whoever should be discover'd to conceal any of Arrius his writings, to dye for it. But it fared very weil with those who were not such fools as to own his opinion. All they were enter­tain'd by the Emperor at a magnificent Feast, receiv'd from his hand rich Pre­sents, and were honorably dismist, with Letters recommending their great Abilities and performance to the Provinces, and injoyning the Nicene Creed to be henceforth observed. With that stroke of the Pen: Socr. l. 1. c. 6. For what threo hundred Bishops have agreed on, (a thing indeed extraordinary) ought not to be otherwise conceiv'd of then as the decree of God Almighty, es­pecially seeing the Holy Ghost did sit upon the minds of such and so excellent men, and open'd his divine will to them. So that they went I trow with ample satisfaction; and, as they could not but take the Emperor for a very civil, ge­nerous, [Page 59] and obliging Gentleman, so they thought the better of themselves from that day forward. And how budge must they look when they returned back to their Diocesses, having every one of 'm been a principal limn of the Aecumenical, Apostolical, Catholick, Orthodox Council! When the Ca [...]a­chrestical titles of the Church and the Clergy were so appropriate to them by custom, that the Christian people had relinquished or forgotten their claim; when every Hare that crossed their way homeward was a Schismatick or an He­retick, and if their Horse stumbled with one of them, he incurr'd an Ana­thema. Well it was that their journeys laid so many several ways, for they were grown so cumbersom and great, that the Emperor's highway was too narrow for any two of them, and there could have been no passage without the removal of a Bishop. But soon after the Council was over, Eusebius the Bi­shop of Nicomedia, and Theognis the Bishop of Nice, who were already re­moved both by banishment and two others put in their places, were quickly re­stor'd upon their petition: wherein they suggested the cause of their not Sign­ing to have been only, because they thought they could not with a safe consci­ence subscribe the Anathema against Arrius, appearing to them both by his writings, his discourses, and Sermons that they had been auditors of, not to be guilty of those errors. As for Arrius himself, the Emperor quickly wrote to him. It is now a considerable time since I writ to your Gravity to come to my Tents, that you might injoy my countenance; so that I can scarce wonder suf­ficiently why you have so long delaid it: therefore now take one of the publick Coaches and make all speed to my Tents, that, having had experience of my kindness and affection to you, you may return into your own Country. God pre­serve you most dear Sir. Arrius hereupon (with his comarade Euzoius) comes to Constantine's Army, and offers him a petition, with a confession of Faith that would have pass'd very well before the Nicene Council, and now satisfied the Emperor Socr. l. 1. c. 19. & 20. insomuch that he writ to Anathasius, now Bishop of Alexandria, to receive him into the Church: but Anathanasius was of better mettle then so and absolutely refus'd it. Upon this Constantine writ him another threat'ning Letter: When you have understood hereby my plea­sure, see that you afford free entrance into the Church to all that desire it: for if I shall understand that any who desires to be admitted into the Church should be either hindred or forbidden by you, I will send some one of my Servants to remove you from your Degree, and place another in your stead. Yet Atha­nasius stood it out still, though other Churches received him into Communion: and the Heretick Novatus could not have been more unrelenting to lapsed Chri­stians then he was to Arrius. But this, joyned with other crimes which were laid to Athanasius his charge, at the Council of Tyre, (though I suppose in­deed they were forged) made Athanasius glad to fly for it, and remain the first time in exile. Upon this whole matter it is my impartial opinion that Ar­rius or whosoever else were guilty of teaching and publishing those errors whereof he was accused, deserved the utmost Severity which consists with the Christian Religion. And so willing I have been to think well of Athanasius and [Page 60] ill of the other, that I have on purpose avoided the reading, as I do the name­ing, of a book that I have hear'd tells the story quite otherwise, and have only made use of the current Historians of those times; who all of them tell it a­gainst the Arrians. Only I will confess, that as in reading a particular Histo­ry at adventure a Man finds himself inclinable to favor the weaker party, es­pecially if the Conqueror appear insolent; so have I been affected in reading these Authors: which does but resemble the reasonable pity that men ordina­rily have too for those who though for an erroneous conscience suffer under a Christian Magistrate. And as soon as I come to Constantius, I shall for that reason change my compassion and be doubly ingaged on the Orthodox party. But as to the whole matter of the Council of Nice, I must crave liberty to say, that from one end to the other, though the best of the kind, it seems to me to have been a pityful humane business, attended with all the ill circumstances of other worldly affairs, conducted by a spirit of ambition and contention, the first and so the greatest Aecumenical blow that by Christians was given to Chri­stianity. And it is not from any sharpness of humor that I discourse thus freely of Things and Persons, much less of Orders of men otherwise venerable, but that where ought is extolled beyond reason and to the prejudice of Religion, it is necessary to depreciate it by true proportion. It is not their censure of Arianism, or the declaring of their opinion in a controverted point to the best of their understanding, (wherein to the smalness of mine they appear to have light upon the truth, had they likewise upon the measure,) that could have moved me to tell so long a story, or bring my self within the danger and aim of any captious Reader, speaking thus with great liberty of mind but little concern for any prejudice I may receive, of things that are by some men I do­lized. But it is their Imposition of a new Article or Creed upon the Christi­an world, not being contained in express words of Scripture, to be believed with Divine Faith, under Spritual and Civil Penalties, contrary to the Privi­ledges of Religion and their making a Precedent follow'd and improv'd by all succeeding ages for most cruel Persecutions, that only could animate me. In digging thus for a new Deduction they undermined the fabrick of Christianity; to frame a particular Doctrine they departed from the general Rule of their Re­ligion; and for their curiosity about an Article concerning Christ, they vio­lated our Saviour's first Institution of a Church not subject to any Addition in matters of Faith, nor liable to Compulsion either in Belief or in Practice. Farr be it from me in the event as it is from my Intention, to derogate from the just authority of any of those Creeds or Confessions of Faith that are receiv'd by our Church upon clear agreement with the Scriptures: nor shall I therefore, unless some mens impertinence and indiscretion hereafter oblige me, pretend to any further knowledg of what in those particulars appears in the ancient Histo­ries. But certainly if any Creed had been Necessary, or at least Necessary to have been Imposed, our Saviour himself would not have left his Church desti­tute in a thing of that moment. Or however, after the Holy Ghost, upon his departure, was descended upon the Apostles, and They the Elders and Bre­thren [Page 61] (for so it was then) were assembled in a legitime Council at Jerusa­lem, it would have seemed good to the Holy Ghost and them to have saved the Council of Nice that labor, Or at least the Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 12. 2. and 4. who was caught up into Paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for any man to utter, having thereby a much better opportunity then Athanasius to know the Doctrine of the Trinity, would not have been want­ing, through the abundance of that revelation, to form a Creed for the Church, sufficient to have put that business beyond controversy. Especially seeing He­resies were sprung up so early, and he foresaw others, and therefore does prescribe the method how they are to be dealt with, but no Creed that I read of.

Shall any sort of men presume to interpret those words, which to him were unspeakable, by a Gibbrish of their Imposing, and force every man to Cant after them what it is not lawful for any man to utter? Christ and his Apostles speak articulately enough in the Scriptures, without any Creed, as much as we are or ought to be capable of. And the Ministry of the Gospel is useful and most necessary, if it were but to press us to the reading of them, to illustrate one place by the authority of another, to inculcate those duties which are there­in required, quickning us both to Faith and Practice, and showing within what bounds they are both circumscribed by our Saviour's Doctrine. And it becomes every man to be able to give a reason and account of his Fa [...]th, and to be ready to do it, without officiously gratifying those who demand it only to take advantage: and the more Christians can agree in one confession of Faith the better. But that we should believe ever the more for a Creed, it cannot be ex­pected. In those days when Creeds were most plenty and in fashion, and eve­ry one had them at their fingers-ends, 'twas the Bible that brought in the Re­formation. 'Tis true, a man would not stick to take two or three Creeds for a need, rather then want a Living, and if a man have not a good swallow, 'tis but wrapping them up in a Liturgy, like a wafer, and the whole dose will go down currently; especially if he wink at the same time and give his Assent and Consent without ever looking on them. But without jesting, for the matter is too serious. Every man is bound to work out his own Salvation with fear and trembling, and therefore to use all helps possible for his best satisfaction: hear­ing, conferring, reading, praying for the assistance of God's Spirit; but when he hath done this, he is his own Expositor, his own both Minister and People, Bishop and Diocess, his own Council; and his Conscience excusing or condemning him, accordingly he escapes or incurs his own internal Anathe­ma. So that when it comes once to a Creed, made and I [...] posed by other men as a matter of Divine Faith, the Case grows very delicate; while he cannot ap­prehend, though the Imposer may, that all therein is clearly contained in Scrip­ture, and may fear being caught in the expressions to oblige himself to a la­titude or restriction, further then comports with his own sense and judgment. A Christian of honor, when it comes to this once, will weigh every word, every syllable, nay further, if he consider that the great business of this Coun­cil [Page 62] of Nice was but one single Letter of the Alphabet, about the inserting or omitting of an Iota. There must be either that exactness in the Form of such a Creed, as I dare say, no men in the world ever were or ever will be able to modulate: or else this scrupulous private judgment must be admitted, or other­wise all Creeds become meer instruments of Equivocation or Persecution. And I must conf [...]ss, when I have sometimes considered with my self the dulness of the Non-conformists, and the acuteness on the contrary of the Episcoparians, and the conscienciousness of both; I have thought that our Church might safely wave the difference with them about Ceremonies, and try it out upon the Creeds, which were both the more honorable way, and more suitable to the method of the ancient Councils, and yet perhaps might do their business as effectually. For one that is a Christian in good earnest, when a Creed is Im­posed, will sooner eat fire then take it against his judgment. There have been Martyrs for Reason, and it was manly in [...]hem: but how much more would men be so for reason Religionated and Christianized! But it is an inhumane and unchristian thing of those Faith-stretchers, whosoever they be, that ei­ther put mens Persons or their Consciences upon the torture, to rack them to the length of their Notions: whereas the Bereans are made Gentlemen and In­nobled by Patent in the Acts, because they would not credit Paul himself, whose writings now make so great a part of the New Testament, untill they had search­ed the Scripture dayly whether those things were so, and therefore many of them believed. And therefore, although where there are such Creeds, Christians may for peace and conscience-sake acquiesce while there appears nothing in them flatly contrary to the words of the Scripture: yet when they are obtruded up­on a man in particular, he will look very well about him and not take them up­on any Humane Authority. The greatest Pretense to Authority is in a Council. But what then? shall all Christians therefore take their Formularies of Divine Worship or Belief, upon trust, as writ in Tables of Stone, like the Com­mandments, deliver'd from Heaven and to be obeyed in the instant not consi­dered: because three hundred and eighteen Bishops are met in Abraham's great Hall, of which most must be servants and some children, and they have resolv'd upon't in such a manner? No, a good Christian will not, cannot at­turn and indenture his conscience over; to be Represented by others. It is not as in Secular matters, where the States of a Kingdom are deputed by their fel­low Subjects to transact for them, so in spiritual: or suppose it were, yet 'twere necessary, as in the Polish constitution, that nothing should be obligatory as long as there is one Dissenter, where no Temporal Interests, but every man's Eternity and Salvation are concerned. The Soul is too precious to be let out at interest upon any humane security, that does or may fail, but it is only safe when under God's custody, in its own Cabinet. But it was a General Coun­cil. A special general indeed if you consider the proportion of three hundred and eighteen, to the body of the Christian Clergy, but much more to all Christian Mankind. But it was a general Free Council of Bishops. I do not think it possible for any Council to be free that is composed only of Bishops, [Page 63] and where they only have the Decisive Voces. Nor that a Free Council that takes away Christian Liberty. But that, as it was founded upon Usurpation, so it terminated in Imposition. But 'tis meant that it was Free from all external Impulsion. I confess that good meat and drink, and lodging, and money in a Man's purse, and coaches and Servants, and horses to attend them, did no vio­lence to 'm, nor was there any false Article in it. And discoursing now with one and then another of 'm in particular, and the Emperor telling them this is my opinion, I understand it thus, and afterwards declaring his mind fre­quently to them in publick; no force neither. Ay! but there was a shrewd way of persuasion in it. And I would be glad to know when ever and which free general Council it was that could properly be called so: but was indeed a­meer Imperial or Ecclesiastical Machine, no free agent, but wound up, set on going, and let dow by the direction and hand of the Workman. A General Free Council is but a word of Art, and can never happen but under a Fifth Mo­narch, and that Monarch too, to return from Heaven. The Animadverter will not allow the second General Council of Nice to have been Free, because it was over awd by an Empress, and was guilty of a great fault (which no Coun­cil at liberty he saith could have committed) the Decree for worshipping of Images. At this rate a Christian may scuffle however for one point among them, and chuse which council he likes best. But in good earnest I do not see but that Constantine might as well at this first council of Nice, have negotiated the Image worship, as to pay that superstitious adoration to the Bishops, and that Prostration to their Creeds was an Idolatry more pernicious in the conse­quence to the Christian Faith, then that under which they so lately had suffer'd Persecution. Nor can a council be said to have been at liberty which laid under so great and many obligations. But the Holy Ghost was present where there were three hundred and eighteen Bishops, and directed them or three hun­dred. Then, if I had been of their counsel, they should have sate at it all their lives, least they should never see him again after they were once risen. But it concerned them to settle their Quorum at first by his Dictates; otherwise no Bishop could have been absent or gone forth upon any occasion, but he let him out again: and it behoov'd to be very punctual in the Adjournments. 'Tis a ridiculous conception, and as gross as to make [...]m of the same Sub­stance with the Council. Nor needs there any strong argument of his absence, then their pretense to be actuated by him, and in doing such Work. The Ho­ly Spirit! If so many of them when they got together, acted like rational Men, 'twas enough in all reason and as much as could be expected.

But this was one affectation, among many others, which the Bishops took up so early, of the stile, priviledges, powers, and some actions a [...]d gestures peculiar and inherent to the Apostles, which they misplaced to their own be­hoof and usage: nay, and chalenged other things as Apostolical, that were di­rectly contrary to the Doctrine and Practice of the Apostles. For so because the Holy Spirit did in an extraordinary manner preside among the Holy Apo­stles at that Legitime Council of Jerusalem, Acts. 15. they, although under [Page 64] an ordinary Administration, would not go less whatever came on't: nay, whereas the Apostles, in the drawing up of their Decree dictated to them by the Holy Spirit, said therefore no more but thus: The Apostles, Elders, and Brethren, send greeting unto the Brethren of, &c. Forasmuch as, &c. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us to lay upon you no greater burthen then these necessary things: that ye abstain from, &c. from which if ye keep your selves, you shall do well. Fare ye well.

This Council denounces every invention of its own; (far from the Apostoli­cal modesty, and the stile of the Holy Spirit) under no less then an Anathe­ma. Such was their arrogating to their inferior degrees the style of Clergy, till custom hath so much prevailed, that we are at a loss how to speak properly either of the name or nature of their function. Whereas the Clergy, in the true and Apostolical sense, were only those whom they superciliously always call the Laity: The word Clerus being never but once used in the New Testa­ment, and in that signification, and in a very unlucky place too, Peter 1. 5. 3. where he admonishes the Priesthood, that they should not Lord it or domineer over, the Christian People, Clerum Domini or the Lord's Inheritance. But having usurp'd the Title, I confess they did right to assume the Power. But to speak of the Priesthood in that style which they most affect, if we consider the nature too of their Function, what were the Clergy then but Lay-men disguis'd, drest up perhaps in another habit? Did not St. Paul himself, being a Tent-ma­ker, rather then be idle or burthensom to his People, work of his trade, even during his Apostleship, to get his living? But did not these, that they might neglect their holy vocation, seek to compass secular imployments, and Lay Offices? Were not very many of them, whether one respect their Vices or Ignorance, as well qualified as any other to be Laymen? Was it not usual as oft as they me­rited it to restore them, as in the case even of the three Bishops, to the Lay­communion? And whether, if they were so peculiar from others, did the Imposition of the Bishops hands, or the lifting up the hands of the Laity con­ferr more to that distinction? And Constantine, notwithstanding his comple­ment at the burning of the Bishops papers, thought he might make them and unmake them with the same power as he did his other Lay-Officers. But if the inferior degrees were the Clergy, the Bishops would be the Church: although that word in the Scripture-sense is proper only to a congregation of the Faithful. And being by that title the only men in Ecclesiastical councils, then when they were once assembled they were the Catholick Church, and, having the Holy Spirit at their devotion, whatsoever Creed they light upon, that was the Ca­tholick Eaith, without believing of which no man be saved. By which means there rose thenceforward so constant persecutions till this day, that, had not the little invisible Catholick Church and a People that always search'd and be­liev'd the Scriptures, made a stand by their Testimonies and sufferings, the Creeds had destroyd the Faith: and the Church had ruined the Religion. For this General council of Nice and all others of the same constitution, did, and can serve to no other end or effect, then particular order of menby their usur­ping [Page 62] a trust upon Christianity, to make their own Price and Market of it, and deliver it up as oft as they see their own Advantage.

For scarce was Constantine's Head cold, but his Son Constantius, succeed­ing his Brothers, being Influenced by the Bishops of the Arrian Party, turn'd the wrong side of Christianity outward, inverted the Poles of Heaven, and Faith (if I may say so) with its Heels in the Air, was forced to stand upon its Head, and play Gambols, for the Divertisment and Pleasure of the Ho­moiousians. Arrianism was the Divinity then in Mode, and he was an igno­rant and ill Courtier, or Church man, that could not dress, and would not make a new Sute for his Conscience in the Fashion. And now the Orthodox Bishops (it being given to those Men to be obstinate for Power, but flexible in Faith;) began to wind about insensibly, as the Heliotrope Flower that keeps its ground, but wrests its Neck in turning after the warm Sun, from Day-break to Evening. They could look now upon the Synod of Nice with more indifference, and all that pudder that had been màde there betwixt Homo­ousios and Homoiousios, &c. began to appear to them as a Difference only arising from the Inadequation of Languages: Till by degrees they were drawn over, and, rather than lose their Bishopricks, would joyn, and at last be the Head­most in the Persecution of their own former Party. But the Deacons, to be sure, that steer'd the Elephants, were thorow-paced; Men to be reckon'd and relied upon in this or any other occasion, and would prick on to render them­selves Capable and Episcopable, upon the first Vacancy. For now the Ar­rians in grain, scorning to come behind the Clownish Homoousians, in any Ec­clesiastical Civility, were resolved to give them their full of Persecution. And it seem'd a piece of Wit rather than Malice, to pay them in their own Coyn, and to Burlesque them in earnest, by the repetition and heightning of the same Severities upon them, that they had practised upon others. Had you the Ho­moousians a Creed at Nice? We will have another Creed for you at Ariminum, and at Seleucia. Would you not be content with so many several Projects of Faith consonant to Scripture, unless you might thrust the new word Homoou­sios down our throats, and then tear it up again, to make us confess it? Tell us the word, ('twas Homoiousios) we are now upon the Guard, or else we shall run you thorow. Would you Anathemize, Banish, Imprison, Execute us, and burn our Books? You shall taste of this Christian Fare, and as you relish it, you shall have more on't provided. And thus it went, Arrianism being Triumphant, but the few sincere or stomachful Bishops, adhering con­stantly, and with a true Christian Magnanimity, especially Athanasius, tho­row all Sufferings unto their former Confessions; expiated so in some mea­sure, what they had committed in the Nicene Council.

Sozom [...]ne, l. 4. c. 25. First tells us a story of Eudoxius, who succeeded Ma­cedonius, in the Bishoprick of Constantinople; that in the Cathedral of Sancta Sophia, being mounted in his Episcopal Throne, the first time that they Assem­bled for its Dedication, in the very beginning of his Sermon to the People (those things were already come in Fashion) told them: Patrem i [...] esse, [Page 61] Filium [...] pium; at which when they began to bustle, Pray be quiet, saith he; I say, Patrem impium esse, quia Colit neminem, Filiem vero Pium quia colit Patrem; at which they then Laughed as heartily, as before they were An­gry. But this I only note to this purpose, that there were some of the great­est Bishops among the Homoiousians, as well as the Homoousians, that could not reproach one anothers Simplicity, and that it was not impossible for the Many, to be Wiser and more Orthodox than the Few, in Divine Matters. That which I cite him for as most Material, is, his Remark upon the Impositi­on then of contrary Creeds: Which verily, faith he, was plainly the beginning of most great Calamities, for as much as hereupon there followed a Disturbance, not unlike those which we before recited over the whole Empire; and likewise a Persecution equal almost to that of the Heathen Emperors, seized upon all of all Churches. For, although it seemed to some more gentle for what concerns the Torture of the Body, yet to prudent Persons it appeared more bitter and severe, by reason of the Dishonor and Ignominy. For both they who stirred up, and those that were afflicted with this Persecution, were of the Christian Church. And the Grievance therefore was the greater and more ugly, in that the same­things which are done among Enemies, were Executed between those of the same Tribe and Profession: But the Holy Law forbids us to carry our selves in that manner, even to those that are Without, and Alien's. And all this Mis­chief sprung from making of Creeds, with which the Bishops, as it were at Tilting, aim'd to hit one another in the Eye, and throw the opposite Party out of the Saddle. But if it chanced that the weaker side were ready to yield, (for what sort of Men was there that could better Manage, or had their Con­sciences more at command at that time than the Clergy?) Then the Arrians would use a yet longer, thicker, and sharper Lance for the purpose, (for there were never Vacancies sufficient) that they might be sure to run them down, over, and thorow, and do their Business. The Creed of Arimi­num was now too short for the Design, but, saith the Historian, they affix'd further Articles like Labels to it, pretending to have made it better, and so sent it thorow the Empire with Constantius his Proclamation, that whoever would not Subscribe it, should be banished. Nay, they would not admit their own beloved Similis Substantia, but, to do the Work throughly, the Arri­ans renoune'd their own Creed for Malice, and made it an Article; Filium Pa­tri tam substantia, quam Voluntate, Dissimilem esse. But that is a small mat­ter with any of them, provided thereby they may do Service to the Church, that is their Party. So that one (seriously speaking) that were really Ortho­dox, could not then defend the Truth or himself, but by turning old Arrian, if he would impugn the new ones; such was the Subtilty. What shall I say more? As the Arts of Glass Coaches and Perriwags illustrate this Age, so by their Trade of Creed-making, then first Invented, we may esteem the Wis­dom of Constantine's, and Constantius his Empire. And in a short space, as is usual among Tradesmen, where it appears Gainful, they were so many that set up of the same Profession, that they could scarce live by one another. [Page 63] Socr. l. 2. c. 32. Therefore uses these words: But now that I have tandem ali­quando, run through this Labyrinth of so many Creeds, I will gather up their number: And so reckons Nine Creeds more, besides that of Nice, before the death of Constantius, (a blessed Number.) And I believe, I could for a need, make them up a Dozen, if Men have a mind to buy them so. And hence it was that Hilary, then Bishop of Poictiers, represents that state of the Church pleasantly, yet sadly, Since the Nicene Synod, saith he, we do nothing but write Creeds. That while we fight about words, whilst we raise Questions about Novelties, while we Quarrel about things doubtful, and about Authors, while we contend in Parties, while there is difficulty in Consent, while we Anathematize one another, there is none now almost that is Christ's. What a Change there is in the last years Creed? The first Decree commands, that Homoousios should not be mentioned. The next does again Decree and Pu­blish Homoousios. The third does by Indulgence excuse the Word Ousia, as used by the Fathers in their simplicity. The fourth does not Excuse, but Condemn it. It is come to that at last, that nothing among us, or those before us, can re­main Sacred or inviolable. We Decree every Year of the Lord, a new Creed concerning God: Nay, every Change of the Moon our Faith is alter'd. We re­pent of our Decrees, we defend those that repent of them; we Anathemize those that we defended, and while we either condemn other Mens Opinions in our own, or our own Opinions in those of other Men, and bite at one another, we are now all of us torn in pieces. This Bishop sure was the Author of the Na­ked Truth, and 'twas he that implicitly condemn'd the whole Catholick Church, both East and West, for being too presumptuous in her Definitions.

It is not strange to me, that Julian, being but a Reader in the Christian Church, should turn Pagan: Especially when I consider that he succeeded Emperor after Constantius. For it seems rather unavoidable that a Man of great Wit, as he was, and not having the Grace of God to direct it, and show him the Beauty of Religion, through the Deformity of its Governours and Teachers; but that he must conceive a Loathing and Aversion for it, Nor could he think that he did them any Injustice, when he observed that, beside all their Unchristian Immorality too, they Practised thus, against the Institu­tive Law of their Galilean, the Persecution among themselves for Religion. And well might he add to his other Severities, that sharpness of his Wit, both Exposing and Animadverting upon them, at another rate than any of the Mo­dern Practitioners with all their Study and Inclination, can ever arrive at. For nothing is more punishable, Contemptible, and truly Ridiculous, than a Chri­stian that walks contrary to his Profession: And by how much any Man stands with more advantage in the Church for Eminency, but disobeys the Laws of Christ by that Priviledg, he is thereby, and deserves to be the more Exposed. But Julian, the last Heathen Emperor, by whose Cruelty it seemed that God would sensibly Admonish once again the Christian Clergy, and show them by their own Smart, and an Heathen Hand, the nature and odiousness of Perse­cution, soon died, as is usual for Men of that Imployment, not without a re­markable stroke of God's Judgment.

[Page 64] Yet they, as if they were only sorry that they had lost so much time, upon his death strove as eagerly to redeem it, and forthwith fell in very naturally in­to their former Animolities. For Jovianus being chosen Emperor in Persia, and returning Homeward, Socr. l. 3. c. 20. the Bishops of each Party, in hopes that theirs should be the Imperial Creed, strait to Horse, and Rode away with Switch and Spur, as if it had been for the Plate, to meet him; and he that had best Heels, made himself cock-sure of winning the Religion. The Macedonians, who dividing from the Arrians, had set up for a new Heresie concerning the Holy Ghost, (and they were a Squadron of Bishops) Petiti­on'd him that those who held, Filium Patri dissimilem, might be turn'd out, and themselves put in their places: Which was very honestly done, and above­board. The Acacians, that were the refined Arrians, but, as the Author saith, Had a notable faculty of addressing themselves to the Inclination of what­soever Emperor, and having good Intelligence that he balanced rather to the Consubstantials, presented him with a very fair Insinuating Subscription, of a considerable number of Bishops to the Council of Nice. But in the next Em­peror's time they will be found to yield little Reverence to their own Subscrip­tion. For in matter of a Creed, a Note of their Hand, without expresting the Penalty, could not it seems Bind one of their Order. But all that Jovia­nus said to the Macedonians, was; I hate Contention, but I lovingly imbrace and reverence those who are inclined to Peace and Concord. To the Acacians, who had wisely given these the precedence of Application, to try the truth of their Intelligence, he said no more (having resolv'd by sweetness and persuasions to quiet all their Controversies) but, That he would not molest any Man what­soever Creed be follow'd, but those above others he would Cherish and Honor, who should show themselves most forward in bringing the Church to a good Agreement. He likewise call'd back all those Bishops who had been Banished by Constantius and Julian, restoring them to their Sees. And he writ a Letter in particular to Athanasius, who upon Julian's death, had enter'd again upon that of Alex­andria, to bid him be of good Courage. And these things coming to the Ears of all others, did wonderfully assuage the Fierceness of those who were Inflamed with Faction and Contention: So that, the Court having declared it self of this Mind, the Church was in a short time in all outward appearance peaceably dis­posed; the Emperor by this Means having wholly repressed all their Violence. Verily, concludes the Historian, the Roman Empire had been prosperous and hap­py, and both the State and the Church (he puts them too in that Order) under so good a Prince, must have exceedingly flourished, had not an Immature death taken him away from managing the Government. For after seven Months, being seized with a mortal Obstruction, he dparted this Life. Did not this Hi­storian, trow you, deserve to be handled, and is it not, now the Mischief i [...] done, to undo the Charm, become a Duty, to Expose both him and Jovianus? By their ill chosen Principles what would have become of the Prime, and most necessary Articles of Faith? Might not the old Dormant Heresies, all of them safely have Revived?

[Page 65] But that Mortal Obstruction of the Bishops, was not by his death (nor is it by their own to be) removed. They were glad he was so soon got out of their way, and God would yet further manifest their intractable Spirit, which not the Persecution of the Heathen Emperor Julian, nor the Gentleness of Jo­vianus the Christian, could allay or mitigate by their Afflictions or Prosperi­ty. The Divine Nemesis executed Justice upon them, by one anothers Hand: And so hainous a Crime as for a Christian, a Bishop, to Persecute, stood yet need, as the only equal and exemplary Punishment, of being Revenged with a Persecution by Christians, by Bishops▪ And whoever shall seriously consider all along the Succession of the Emperors, can never have taken that Satisfacti­on in the most judicious Representations of the Scene, which he may in this worthy Speculation of the great Order and admirable conduct of Wise Pro­vidence, through the whole contexture of these Exterior, seeming Accidents, relating to the Ecclesiasticals of Christianity.

For to Jovianus succeeded Valentinian, who in a short time took his Bro­ther Valens to be his Companion in the Empire. These two Brothers, did as the Historian observes, Socr. l. 4. c. 1. (alike, and equally take care at the beginning, for the Advantage and Government of the State) but very much disagreed, though both Christians, in matter of Religion: Valetinianus the Elder being an Orthodox, but Valens an Arrian, and they used a different Me­thod toward the Christians. For Valentinian (who chose the Western part of the Empire, and left the East to his Brother) as he imbraced those of his own Creed, so yet he did not in the least molest the Arrians: But Valens not only Labor'd to increase the number of the Arrians, but Afflicted those of the contrary Opinion with grievous Punishments. And both of 'm, especial­ly Valens had Bishops for their purpose. The particulars of that heavy Perse­cution under Valens, any one may further satisfy himself of in the Writers of those Times: And yet it is observable, that within a little space while he pur­sued the Orthodox Bishops, he gave Liberty to the [...] (who were of the same Creed, but separated from them, as I have said, upon Discipline, &c.) and caused their Churches, which for a while were shut up, to be opened again at Constantinople. To be short, Valens (who out-lived his Brother, that died of a natural Death,) himself in a battel against the Goths, could not escape neither the fate of a Christian Persecutor. For the Goths having made Appli­cation to him, he, saith Socrates, not well fore-seeing the Consequence, admitted them to Inhabit in certain places of Thracia, pleasing himself that he should by that means, always have an Army ready at hand against whatsoever Enemie; and that those Foraign Guards would strike them with a greater Terror, more by far than the Militia of his Subjects. And so, slighting the ancient Veterane Militia, which used to consist of Bodies of Men raised proportionably in every Province, and were stout Fellows that would Fight Manfully; instead of them he levied Money, rating the Country at so much for every Souldier. But these new Inmates of the Emperors soon grew Troublesom, as is customary, and not only infested the Natives in Thracia, but Plunder'd even the Suburbs of Constantinople, there being no armed Force to repress them: Hereupon the [Page 66] whole People of the City cried out at a publick Spectacle, where Valens was present neglecting this matter, Give us Arms and we will manage this War our selves. This extreamly provok'd him, so that he forthwith made an Expedi­tion against the Goths: But Threatned the Citizens if he turn'd in safety, to be Reveng'd on them both for those Contumelies, and for what under the Ty­rant Procopius, they had committed against the Empire, and that he would Raze to the Ground, and Plow up the City. Yet before his departure, out of fear of the Foraign Enemy, he totally ceas'd from persecuting the Orthodox in Constantinople. But he was kill'd in the Fight, or Flying into a Village that the Goths had set on fire, he was there burnt to ashes: to the great grief of his Bishops, who, had he been Victorious, might have revived the Persecu­tion. Such was the end of his Impetuous Reign and rash Counsels both as to his Government of State, in matters of Peace and War, and his Manage of the Church by Persecution.

His death brings me to the Succession of Theodosius the Great, then whom no Christian Emperor did more make it his business to Nurse up the Church, and to Lull the Bishops, to keep the House in quiet. But neither was it in his power to still their Bawling, and Scratching one another, as far as their Nails (which were yet more tender, but afterwards grew like Tallons) would give them leave. I shall not further vex the History, or the Reader, in recount­ing the Particulars; taking no delight neither my self in so uncomfortable Re­lations, or to reflect beyond what is necessary upon the Wolfishness of those which then seemed, and ought to have been, the Christian Pastors, but went on scattering their Flocks, if not devouring; and the Shepherds smiting one another. In his Reign, the second General Council was called, that of Con­stantinople, and the Creed was there made which took its name from the place: The rest of their business, any one that is further curious, may observe in the Writers. But I shall close this with a short touch concerning Gregory Nazian­zen, then living, than whom also the Christian Church had not in those times (and I question whether in any succeeding) a Bishop that was more a Chri­stian, more a Gentleman, better appointed in all sorts of Learning requisite, seasoned under Julian's Persecution, and exemplary to the highest pitch of true Religion, and Practical Piety. The eminence of these Vertues, and in special of his Humility (the lowliest but the highest of all Christian Qualifica­tions) raised him under Theodosius, from the Parish-like Bishoprick of Nazi­anzum, to that of Constantinople, where he fill'd his place in that Council. But having taken notice in what manner things were carried in that, as they had been in former Councils, and that some of the Bishops muttered at his promo­tion; he of his own mind resigned that great Bishoprick, which was never of his desire or seeking, and, though so highly seated in the Emperors Reverence and Favor, so acceptable to the People, and generally to the Clergy, whose unequal Abilities could not pretend or justifie an envy against him; retired back far more content to a Solitary Life to his little Nazianzum. And from thence he writes that Letter to his Friend Procopius, wherein, p. 814. upon his most recollected and serious reflexion on what had faln within his observa­tion, [Page 67] he useth these remarkable words: I have resolved with my self (if I may tell you the Naked Truth,) never more to come into any assembly of Bishops: for I never saw a good and haypy end of any Council, but which rather increased then remedied the mischieves. For their obstinate Contentions and Ambition are unexpressible.

It would require too great a Volume to deduce, from the death of Theodo­sius, the particulars that happened in the succeeding Reigns about this matter. But the Reader may reckon, that it was as stated a Quarrel betwixt the Homo­ousians, and the Homoiousians, as that between the Houses of York and Lanca­ster: And there arose now an Emperor of one Line, and then again of the o­ther. But among all the Bishops, there was not one Morton, whose indu­strious Brain could or would (for some Men always reap by Division) make up the fatal Breach betwixt the two Creeds. By this means every Creed was grown up to a Test, and, under that pretence, the dextrous Bishops step by step hooked within their Verge, all the business and Power that could be catched in those Turbulences, where they mudled the Water and Fished after. By this means they stalked on first to a Spiritual kind of Dominion, and from that incroached upon and into the Civil Jurisdiction. A Bishop now grew terrible, and, (whereas a simple Layman might have frighted the Devil with the first words of the Apostles Creed, and I defie thee Satan) one Creed could not protect him from a Bishop, and it required a much longer, and a double and treble Confession, unless himself would be delivered over to Satan by an Ana­thema. But this was only an Ecclesiastical sentence at first, with which they marked out such as sinned against them, and then whoop'd and hollow'd on the Civil Magistrate, to hunt them down for their Spiritual Pleasure. They crept at first by Court Insinuations and Flattery into the Princes favor, till those ge­nerous Creatures suffered themselves to be backed and ridden by them, who would take as much of a free Horse as possible: but in Persecution the Clergy as yet, wisely interposed the Magistrate betwixt themselves and the People, not caring so their end were attained, how odious they rendred him: And you may observe that for the most part hitherto, they stood crouching and shot ei­ther over the Emperors back, or under his belly. But in process of Time they became bolder and open-fac'd, and Persecuted before the Sun at Mid-day. Bi­shops grew worse, but Bishopricks every day better and better. There was now no Eusebius left to refuse the Bishoprick of Antiochia, whom there­fore Constantine told, That he deserv'd the Bishoprick of the whole World for that Modesty. They were not such Fools as Ammonius Parotes, I warrant you, in the time of Theodosius. He, Socr. l. 6. c. 30. being seised upon by some that would needs make him a Bishop, when he could not perswade them to the contra­ry, cut off one of his Ears, telling them that now, should he himself desire to be a Bishop, he was by the Law of Priesthood incapable: but when they observed that those things only obliged the Jewish Priensthood, and that the Church of Christ did not consider whether-a Priest were sound or perfect in limb of Body, but only that he were intire in his manners; they return'd to seize on him again: But when he saw them coming, he swore with a solemn Oath, that, if to Conse­crate [Page 68] him a Bishop they laid violent hands upon him, he would out out his tongue also; whereupon they, fearing he would do it, desisted. What should have been the matter, that a man so Learned and Holy, should have such an aversi­on to be promoted in his own Order; that, rather than yield to be a Compel­led or Compelling Bishop, he would inflict upon himself as severe a Martyr­dom, as any Persecutor could have done for him? Sure he saw somthing more in the very Constitution, than some do at present. But this indeed was an Exam­ple too Rigid, and neither fit to have been done, nor to be imitated, as there was no danger. For far from this they followed the precedent rather of Dama­sus, and Ursinus, which last, Socr. l. 4. c. 24. In Valentinian 's time, persuad­ed certain obscure and abject Bishops (for there were it seems of all sorts and sizes) to create him Bishop in a Corner, and then (so early) he and Damasus, who was much the better Man: waged War for the Bishoprick of Rome, to the great scandal of the Pagan Writers, who made Remarks for this and o­ther things upon their Christianity, and to the Bloodshed and Death of a mul­titude of the Christian People. But this last I mention'd, only as a weak and imperfect Essay in that time, of what it came to in the several Ages after, which I am now speaking of, when the Bishops were given, gave themselves, over to all manner of Vice, Luxury, Pride, Ignorance, Superstition, Cove­tousness, and Monopolizing of all secular Imployments and Authority. No­thing could escape them: They meddled, troubled themselves and others, with many things, every thing forgetting that one, only needful. Insomuch that I could not avoid wondring often that, among so many Churches that with Paganick Rites, they dedicated to Saint Mary, I have met with none to Saint Martha. But above all, Imposition and Cruelty became inherent to them, and the power of Persecution was grown so good and desirable a thing, that they thought the Magistrate scarce worthy to be trusted with it longer, and a meer Novice at it, and either wrested it out of his hands, or gently eased him of that and his other burdens of Government. The Sufferings of the Laity were become the Royalties of the Clergy; and, being very careful Christians, the Bishops, that not a word of our Saviours might fall to the Ground, be­cause he had foretold how Men should be Persecuted for his Names sake, they undertook to see it done effectually in their own Provinces, and out of pure zeal of doing him the more Service of this kind, inlarged studiously their Diocesses beyond all proportion. Like Nostradamus his Son, that to fulfil his Father's prediction of a City in France, that should be Burned; with his own hands set it on fire. All the calamities of the Christian World in those Ages, may be derived from them, while they warm'd themselves at the Flame; and, like Lords of Misrule, kept a perpetual Christmas. What in the Bishop's name is the matter? How came it about that Christianity, which approved it self under all Persecutions to the Heathen Emperors, and merited their Favor so far, till at last it regularly succeeded to the Monarchy, should under those of their own Profession be more distressed? Were there some Christians then too, that feared still lest Men should be Christians, and for whom it was [Page 69] necessary, not for the Gospel reason that there should be Heresies. Let us col­lect a little now also in the conclusion what at first was not particulariz'd, how the reason of State and Measure of Government stood under the Roman Em­perours, in aspect to them. I omit Tiberius, mention'd in the beginning of this Essay. Trajane, after having persecuted them, and having used Pliny the se­cond in his Province to that purpose, upon his relation that they lived in con­formity to all Lawes, but that which for bad their Worship, and in all other things were blameless, and good men, straitly by his Edict commanded that none of them should be farther enquired after. Hadrian, in his Edict to Mi­nutius Fundanus, Pro-consul of Asia, commands him that, If any accuse the Christians, and can prove it, that they commit anything against the State, that then he punish them according to the crime: but if any man accuse them, meerly for calumny and vexation, as Christians, then t'saith let him suffer sor't, and take you care that he [...]eel the smart of it. Antoninus Pius writ his Edict, very remarkable if there were place here to recite it, to the States of Asia assembled at Ephesus; wherein he takes notice of his fathers command that, unless the Christians were found to act any thing against the Roman Empire, they should not be molested and then commands that, if any man thereafter shall continue to trouble them, tanquam tales, as Christians, for their Worship, in that case he that is the Informer should be exposed to punishment, but the accused should be free and discharged. I could not but observe that among other things in this E­dict, where he is speaking, It is desirable to them that they may appear, being accused, more willing [...]dy for their God then to live, he adds. It would not be amiss to admonish you concerning the Earthquakes which have, and do now hap­pen, that when you are afflicted at them, you would compare our affairs with theirs. They are thereby so much the more incouraged to a confidence and reli­ance upon God, but you all the while go on in your ignorance, and neglect both other gods, and the Religion towards the immortal, and banish and persecute them unto death. Which words of that Emperours, fall in so naturally with what, it seems, was a common observation about Earthquakes, that I cannot but to that purpose take further notice, how also Gregory Nazianzen, in Or. 2 ^d. contra Gentiles, tells, besides the breakings in of the Sea in several places, and many fires that happened, of the Earthquakes in particular, which he reckons as Symptomes of Julian's Persecution. And to this I may add. Socr. l. 3. c. 10. who in the Reign of Valens, that notorious Christian Persecutor, saith, at the same time there was an Earthquake in Bithynia, which ruined the City of Nice, (that same in which that general Counsel was held under Constan­tine) and a little after there was another. But although these so happened, the minds of Valens and of Eudoxius, the Bishop of the Arrians were not at all stir­red up unto Piety, and a right opinion of Religion: For neverthless they never ceased, made no end of persecuting those who in their Creed dissented from them. Those Earthquakes seemed to be certain indications of tumult in the Church. All which put together, could not but make me reflect upon the late Earth­quakes, [Page 70] great by how much more unusual, here in England, thorow so many Counties since Christmas, at the same time when the Clergy, some of them, were so busy in their Cabals, to promote this (I would give it a modester name then) Persecution, which is now on foot against the Disfenters; at so unseaso­nable a time, and upon no occasion administred by them, that those who com­prehend the reasons, yet cannot but wonder at the wisdome of it. Yet I am not neither one of the most credulous nickers or applyers of natural events to hu­main transactions: but neither am I so secure as the Learned Dr. Spencer, nor can walk along the world without having some eye to the conjunctures of God's admirable Providence. Neither was Marcus Aurelius (that I may re­turn to my matter) negligent as to this particular. But he, observing, as An­toninus had the Earthquakes, that in an expedition against the Germans, and Sarmatians: his Army being in despair almost for want of water, the Meli­tine (afterwards from the event called the Thundring) Legion, which consi­sted of Christians, kneel'd down in the very heat of their thirst and fight, pray­ing for rain, which posture the enemyes wondring at, immediately there brake out such a thundring and lightning as together with the Christian valour, routed the adverse Army, but so much rain fell therewith, as refreshed Aure­lius his Forces that were at the last gasp for thirst, he thence forward comman­ded by his Letters; that upon pain of death none should inform against the Chri­stians, as Tertulian in his Apology for the Christians witnesses. But who would have believed that even Commodus, so great a Tyrant otherwise, should have been so favourable as to make a Law, that the informers against Christi­ans should be punished with Death? Yet he did, and the Informer against A­pollanius was by it executed. Much less could a man have thought that, that prodigy of cruelty Maximine, and who exercised it so severely upon the Christians, should, as he did, being struck with God's hand, publish when it was too late Edict after Edict, in great favour of the Christians. But above all, nothing could have been less expected then that, after those Heathen Empe­rours, the first Christian Constantine should have been seduced by the Bi­shops, to be, after them, the first occasion of Persecution, so contrary to his own excellent inclination: 'Twas then that he spake his own mind, when he said, Eus. de vitâ Consti. 60. You ought to retain within the bounds of your private thoughts those things, which you cunningly and subtly seek out concer­ning most frivolous questions. And then much plainer, c. 67. where he saith so wisely. You are not ignorant that the Philosophers all of them do agree in the profession of the same Discipline, but do oftentimes differ in some part of the opi­nions which they dogmatize in: but yet, although they do dissent about the Dis­cipline that each several Sect observeth, they nevertheless reconcile themselves again for the sake of that common Prosession to which they have concurred. But against compulsion in Religious matters so much every where, that it is need­less to insert one passage. And he being of this disposition, and universally Fa­mous for his care and countenance of the Christian Religion. Eusebius saith [Page 71] these words: While the people of God did glory and heighten it self in the doing of good things, and all fear from without was taken away, and the Church was fortifi'd as I may say, on all sides by a peaceable and illustrious tranquility, then Envy lying in wait against our prosperity, craftily crept in, and began first to dance in the midst of the company of Bishops: so goes on, telling the History of Alexander and Arrius. I have been before large enough in that relation, wherein it appeared that, contrary to that great Emperours pious intention, whereas Envy began to dance among the Bishops first, the good Constantine brought them the Fiddles. But it appear'd likewise how soon he was weary of the Bal, and toward his latter end, as Princes often do upon too late experi­ence, would have redressed all and returned to his natural temper. Of the other Christian Emperours I likewise discoursed, omitting, that I might in­sert it in this place, how the great Heathen Philosopher Themistius, in his Con­sular Oration, celebrated Jovianus for having given that toleration in Chri­stian Religion, and thereby defeated the flattering Bishops, which fort of men, saith he wittily, do not worship God, but the Imperial Purple.

It was the same Themistius that, only out of an upright natural apprehensi­on of things, made that excellent Oration afterward to Valens, which is in Print, exhorting him to cease Persecution: wherein he chances upon, and im­proves the same notion with Constantine's, and tells him: That he should not wonder at the Dissents in Christian Religion, which were very small, if compared with the multitude and crowd of Opinions among the Gentile Philosophers; for there were at least three hundred differences, and a very great dissention among them there was about their resolutions, unto which each several Sect was as it were necessarily bound up and obliged: and that God seemed to intend more to illustrate his own glory by that diverse and unequal variety of Opinions, to the end every each one might therefore so much the more reverence his Divine Maje­sty, because it is not possible for any one accurately to know him. And this had a good effect upon Valens, for the mitigating in some measure his severities a­gainst his fellow Christians. So that after having cast about, in this Summary again, (whereby it plainly appears that according to natural right and the ap­prehension of all sober Heathen Governours, Christianity as a Religion, was wholly exempt from the Magistrates jurisdiction or Lawes, farther than any particular person among them immorally transgressed, as others, the com­mon rules of humain society) I cannot but return to the Question with which I begun. What was the matter? How came it about that Christianity, which approved it self under all Persecutions to the Heathen Emperours, and meri­ted their favour so far, till at last it regularly succeeded to the Monarchy, should, under those of their own profession, be more distressed? But the An­swer is now much shorter and certainer, and I will adventure boldly to say, the true and single cause then was the Bishops. And they were the cause a­gainst reason. For what power had the Emperours by growing Christians, more then those had before them? None. What obligation were Christ an [Page 72] Subjects under to the Magistrate more then before? None. But the Magistrates Christian authority was, what the Apostle describ'd it while Heathen, not to be a terror to good works, but to evil. What new Power had the Bishops ac­quired, whereby they turned every Ponti [...] into a Gaiaphat? None neither? 2 Cor. 10. 8. Had they been Apostles, The Lord had but gi­ven them Authority for edification, not for destruction. They, of all other, ought to have Preached to the Magistrate, the terrible denunciations in Scri­pture against usurping upon and persecuting of Christians. They, of all others, ought to have laid before them the horrible Examples of God's ordinary Ju­stice against those that exercised Persecution. But, provided they could be the Swearers of the Prince to do all due Allegiance to the Church, and to preserve the Rights and liberties of the Church, however they came by them, they would give him as much scope as he pleased in matter of Christianity, and would be the first to solicite him to break the Laws of Christ, and ply him with hot places of Scripture in order to all manner of Oppression and Persecution in Civils and Spirituals. So that the whose business how this unchristian Tyran­ny came and could entitle it self among Christians, against the Christian pri­viledges, was only the case in Zech. 13. 6. 7 And one shall say unto him, what are these wounds in thy hands? then he shall answer, those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends. Because they were all Christians, they thought forsooth they might make the bolder with them, make bolder with Christ, and wound him again in the hands and feet, of his members. Because they were friends they might use them more coursly, and abuse them, against all common civility, in their own house, which is a Protection to Strangers. And all this to the end that a Bishop might sit with the Prince in a Junto, to consult wisely how to preserve him from those people that never meant him any harm, and to secure him from the Sedition and Rebellion of men that seek, nor think, any thing more but to follow their own Religious, Christian Worship. It was indeed as ridiculous a thing to the Pagans to see that work, as it was afterwards in England to strangers, where Papists and Protestants went both to wrack at the same instant, in the same market, and when Erasmus said wittily, Quid a­gitur in Augliâ? Consulitur he might have added though not so elegantly Comburitur) de Religione. Because they knew that Christian Worship was free by Christ's institution, they procured the Magistrate to make Laws in it concerning things unnecessary; As the Heathen Persecutor Julian introduced some bordering Ragan Ceremonyes, and arguing with themselves in the same manner as he did, Soz. l. 5. c. 16. That if Christians should obey those Lawes they should be able to bring them about to something further which they had desig­ned. But if they would not, then they might proceed against them without any hope of pardon, as breakers of the Laws of the Empire, and represent them as turbulent and dangerous to the Government. Indeed, whatsoever the Animad­verter saith of the Act of Seditious Conventicles hero in England, as if it were Anvill'd after another of the Romane Senate, the Christians of those Ages, [Page 73] had all the finest tooles of Persecution out of Julian's Shop, and studied him then as curiously as some do now Machiavel. These Bishops it was who, be­cause the Rule of Christ was incompatible with the Power that they assumed, and the Vices they practised, had no way to render themselves necessary or tolerable to Princes, but by making true piety difficult, by Innovating Laws to revenge themselves upon it, and by turning Makebates between Prince and People, instilling dangers of which themselves were the Authors. Hence it is that having awakened this jealousy once in the Magistrate against Religi­on, they made both the Secular and the Ecclesiastical Government so uneasy to him, that most Princes began to look upon their Subjects as their Enemies, and to imagine a reason of State different from the Interest of their People: and therefore to weaken themselves by seeking unnecessary & grievous supports to their authority. Whereas if men could have refrain'd this cunning, and from thence forcible, governing of Christianity, leaving it to its own simplicity, and due Liberty, but causing them in all other things to keep the King's and Christ's peace among themselves and towards others, all the ill that could have come of it would have been that such kind of Bishops should have prov'd less imple­mental, but the good that must have thence risen to the Christian Magistrate and the Church, then and ever after, would have been inexpressible.

But this discourse having run in a manner wholly upon the Imposition of Creeds, may seem not to concern (and I desire that it may not reflect upon) our Clergy, nor the Controversies which have so unhappyly vex'd our Church, ever since the reign of Edward the Sixth unto this day. Only, if there might somthing be pick'd out of it towards the Compromising of those differences (which I have not from any performance of mine the vanity to imagine) it may have use as an Argument a Majori ad Minus, their disputes having risen only from that of Creeds, ours from the Imposition only of Ceremonies, which are of much inferior consideration. Faith being necessary, but Cere­monies Despensable. Unless our Church should lay the same weight upon them as the Animadverter has done thorow his whole Studious Chapter on that Sub­ject, and because p. 34. this is the time of her settlement, that there is a Church at the end of every Mile, that the Sovereign Powers spread their wings to cover and protect her, that Kings and Queens are her Nursing Fa­thers and Nursing Mothers, that she hath stately Cathedrals, there he so many arguments now to make Ceremonies Necessary: which may all be an­swered with one Question that they use to ask Children. Where are you proud? But I should rather hope from the wisdom and Christianity of the present guids of our Chruch, that they will (after an age and more, after so long a time almost as those Primitive Bishops I have spoke of, yet suffered the Novatian Bishops in every Diocess) have mercy on the Nation, that hath been upon so slender a matter as the Ceremonies and Liturgy so long, so miserably ha­rass'd. That they will have mercy upon the King, whom they know against his natural inclination, His Royal Intention, his many Declarations, they have induced to more Severities, then all the Reigns since the Conquest will [Page 74] contain if summ'd up together: who may, as Constantine among his Private Devotions put up one Collect to the Bishops. Euseb. de vitâ Const. c. 70. Date igitur mihi Dies tranquillos & Noctes curarum expertes. And it runs, thus almost altogether verbatim in that Historian. Grant, most merciful Bi­shop and Priest that I may have calm days, and nights free from care and mo­testation, that I may live a peaceable life in all Godlyness and honesty for the future by your good agreement; which unless you vouchsafe me, I shall wast a­way my Reign in perpetual sadness and vexation. For as long as the people of God stands divided by so unjust and pernicious a Contention, how can it be that I can have any ease in my own Spirit. Open therefore by your good agreement the way to me, that I may continue my Expedition towards the East; and grant that I may see both you and all the rest of my people, having laid aside your ani­mosities, rejoycing together, that we may all with one voice give laud and glo­ry, for the Common good agreement and liberty, to God Almighty for ever. Amen. But if neither the People, nor his Majesty enter into their consider­ation. I hope it is no unreasonable request that they will be merciful unto themselves, and have some reverence at least for the Naked Truth of History, which either in their own times will meet with them, or in the next age over­take them: That they, who are some of them so old that, as Confessors, they were the Scarrs of the former troubles, others of them so young, that they are free from all the Motives of Revenge and Hatred, should yet joyn in reviving the former persecutions upon the pretences, yea even themselves in a turbulent, military, and uncanonical manner execute Laws of their own pro­curing, and depute their inferior Clergy to be the Informers. I should rather hope to see not only that Controversy so scandalous abolished, but that also up­on so good an occasion as the Author of the Naked Truth hath administred them, they will inspect their Clergy, and cause many things to be corrected, which are far more ruinous in the Consequence then the dispensing with a Sur­plice. I shall mention some too confusedly, as they occur to my Pen, at pre­sent, reserving much more for better leasure. Methinks it might be of great edification, that those of them who have ample possessions should be in a good sense. Mult as inter opes inopes. That they would inspect the Canons of the ancient Councils, where are many excellent ones for the regulation of the Clergy. I saw one, looking but among those of the same Council of Nice, against any Bishops removing from a less Bishoprick to a greater, nor that any of the Inferior Clergy should leave a less living for a fatter. That is methinks the most Natural use of General or any Councils to make Canons, as it were By-Laws for the ordering of their own Society, but they ought not to take out, much less forge any Patent to invade and prejudice the Community. It were good that the greater Churchmen relyed more upon themselves, and their own direction, not building too much upon stripling Chaplains: that men may not suppose the Master (as one that has a good Horse or a Fleet­hound) attributes to himself the vertues of his Creature. That they inspect the Morals of the Clergy: the Moral Hereticks, do the Church more harm [Page 75] then all the Non-conformists can do, or can wish it. That before they admit men to subscribe the Thirty nine Articles for a Benefice, they try whether they know the meaning. That they would much recommend to them the rea­ding of the Bible. Tis a very good book, and if a man read it carefully, will make him much wiser. That they would advise them to keep the Sab­bath: if there were no morality in the day, yet there is a great deal of pru­dence in the observing it. That they would instruct those that came for Holy Orders and Livings, that it is a terrible vocation they enter upon, but that has indeed the greatest reward. That to gain a Soul is beyond all the acquists of Traffick, and to convert an Atheist more glorious then all the Conquests of the Souldier. That, betaking themselves to this Spiritual Warfare, they ought to disintangle from the World. That they do not ride for a Benefice as if it were for a Fortune or a Mistress, but there is more in it. That they take the Ministry up not as a Trade, and, because they have heard of Whit­tington, in expectation that the Bells may so chime that they come in their turns to be Lord Mayors of Lambeth. That they make them understand, as well as they can, what is the Grace of God. That they do not come into the Pulpit too full of Fustian or Logick, a good life is a Clergy man's best Syllo­gism, and the quaintest Oratory: and till they out-live 'm they will never get the better of the Fanaticks, nor be able to preach with Demonstration of Spi­rit or with any effect or Authority. That they be Lowly minded, and no Railers.

And particularly, that the Archdeacon of Canterbury being in ill humor upon account of his Ecclesiastical Policy, may not continue to revenge himself upon the innocent Walloons there, by ruining their Church which subsists up­on the Ecclesiastical Power of His Majesty and so many of His Royal Prede­cessors.

But these things require greater Time, and to enumerate all that is amiss, might perhaps be as endless as to number the People: nor are they within the ordinary sphaere of my Capacity, and our Exposer will think I have forgot him, I shall take my leave of him for the present, being only troubled to find out a Complement for so civil a Person. It must be thus.

I will not say as Popilius said to Antiochus, nor as Demosthenes said to Es­chines, nor as the most Learned P. Aerodius, or the Jesuite Gaspar Schot­tus said to the Animadverter, nor as Dolubella said to Cicero, nor as the Chri­stian Cicero said to the English Parliament, nor as the Roman Centurion said to the Roman Ensign: but I will say somthing like what Leonas (that presided from Constantius at the Council at Seleucia, when they made an endless Dis­puting to no purpose) said to them: not, Abi [...]e igitur & in Ecclesiâ nugas agite, but, good Mr. Exposer, what do you Loytering like an idle Schollar, and Animadverting here in Town? get you home again, or it were better for you, and Expose and Animadvert, as long as you will, at your own Col­ledg.

But as to a new Book fresh come out, Intitled, the Author of the Naked [Page 76] Truth stripp'd Naked (to the Fe [...], or to the skin) that Hieroglyphical Quib­ble of the Great Gunn, on the Title Page, will not excuse Bishop Gunning. For his Sermon is still expected.

But to the Judicious and Serious Reader, to whom I wish any thing I have said, may have given no unwelcom entertainment, I shall only so far justify my self, that I thought it no less concerned me to vindicate the Laity from the Impositions that the Few would force upon them, then him to defend those Im­positions on behalf of the Clergy. And moreover I judged my self most pro­per for the work, it not being fit that so slight a Pamphlet as his should be an­swered by any Man of great abilities. For the rest I take the Naked Truth to have been part of that effect which Reverend Mr. Hooker foretold Praef. to E [...]l. Policy. p. 10. The time will come when Three words, uttered with Cha­rity and Meekness, shall receive a far more blessed reward, then Three thou­sand Volumes writen with disdainful sharpness of Wit. And I shall conclude with him in his close. I trust in the Almighty that with us Contentions are now at the highest float, and that the day will come (for what cause is there of Dispair) when the Passions of former enmity being allaid, men shall with ten times redoubled tokens of unfainedly reconciled Love, shew themselves each to other the same which Joseph and the Brethren of Joseph were at the time of their Enterview in Egypt. And upon this condition, let my Book also (yea my self if it were needful) be burnt by the hand of the, Animadverter.