SOME QUERIES Concerning the Election of Members For the Ensuing PARLIAMENT. TOGETHER With a REPLY by way of QUERY to the same.

LONDON, Printed in the Year 1690.

Some Queries concerning the Election of Members for the Ensuing Parliament.

1. WHether the King hath not lately by Actions, as well as Promises, declar'd himself for the Interest of the Church of England; and whether those Republicans, who have always made it their business to libel Kings, can more effectually abuse his present Majesty, than in traducing him as their Friend, and in using, as heretofore, a King's Name against his Design and Interest?

2. Whether those are true to the Interest of that Church, who endeavour'd in the last Session to incapa­citate some of the best Members of it; and who were so far from granting that Amnesty which the King de­sir'd and propos'd, that they carryed their Fury back to more than one preceding Reign, and set aside all Acts of Indemnity, but that, which most of them need, in the Year 1660?

3. Whether since the Dissenters do not now desire a Toleration for themselves, which we have already grant­ed, but openly threaten and pursue their Revenge on us, it is not necessary that these apparent dangers, at least, should awaken us out of our Lethargy; and whether the Negligence of the Church of England, which on like occasions heretofore, was thought the result of Pity and good Nature, would not now be esteem'd the Effect of Cowardice and Stupidity?

4. Whether those Gentlemen of the Sword, who have Offices in Ireland, would not be better imploy'd in a Council of War than a Senate-House? Whether, if they think it convenient, it would not be proper for them to make one Visit to the Remains of their Regiments there, and to contribute by some other means to the Reducing that Kingdom, than by giving Taxes?

5. Whether those restless Phanaticks, who have been bred up in Rebellion, and have always since been active Promoters of Sedition, ought not in conscience to desist now, and to be contented with the single glory of having once ruin'd this Kingdom?

6. Whether those Worthy Gentlemen have been just­ly expos'd, in a late impudent Pamphlet, that were more hasty for sending a speedy Relief into Ireland, See a List of those that were for the Re­gency 1690. Lond. than for changing the Right of Succession in an Hereditary Kingdom; and whether they may not possibly deserve a place again in the House, though they thought it more expedient for this Nation to beat K. James out of that One Kingdom, than to Vote his Daughter out of Three?

7. Whether the King be not now sensible, that most of those hasty Abdicators did not change the Succession out of kindness to him, but out of a farther Design of bringing in a Common-wealth, or, in other words, of making this an Elective and precarious Monarchy?

8. Whether the Temper of those Excellent Members deserves Censure, who have promoted a General Pardon, and in that an Universal Quiet and Satisfaction; and who were not very active in suspending the Bishops, unwhip­ping Oats, and in excepting every body out of the no-Act of Indemnity?

9. Whether any Man can justly stand Recommended to your Choice by no other Advantages than those of an old Treason, and a long Exile for it? and whether one may reasonably be thought to have improv'd his Crime into Vertue, and to become a Patriot of his Coun­try, by being outlaw'd into Holland?

10. Whether such men as these may not possibly be Factors for Geneva and Amsterdam, and more mindful of their late Fellow-Burgers than their old Countrymen; and whether their frequent protestation, That they are true Englishmen, would not convince the greatest Sceptick, [Page 5](if he understands their veracity) that they are not so.

11. Whether our good Brethren the Dutch, according to their usual kindness, would not, in all probability, have forborn to arrest us for their Debt, 'till the Conquest of Ireland had put us in a capacity of repaying them; and whether those Men, who in the absence of most of the Members, gave 600000 l. to the Dutch, did not more consider their own good will to the Creditors, than our ability?

I do not mean Sir R. Nudigate, nor Sir R. Cotton of Cheshire.12. Whether it was not a strange instance of Justice, in a Knight of the Shire, to move for a new Assessment of his own County; and whether if the County do not choose him again, they will not demonstratively shew, that they have more kindness for their Money than their Representative?

13. Whether there ever was a better Parliament in General, than that of K. James the Second, and whether any body would approve the Re-election of those worthy Members, who do not wish for a new Monmouth, and another Argyle?

14. Whether many honest Gentlemen, of Nice Prin­ciples, did not desist from standing at the last Election, as having raised more Scruples to themselves than they could easily answer; and therefore not hoping to untie the Gordian Knot, put it for once into the hands of those men who could effectually cut it? And whether now these Gentlemen will not be concern'd to redeem their neglect, and the more diligently to avert the blow, by how much the less careful they were to prevent the stroke?

15. Whether the Clergy of the C. of E. are not con­cern'd to be as diligent against Phanatacism now, as of late against Popery; at least, such of them as have a greater Respect for Pulpits and Chappels, than for Tubs and Barns?

16. Whether if those men who were incapacitated for procuring or consenting to Surrenders, shall again Vote for their Judges, they will not give a signal Instance of their forgiving humour, and shew to the World, that they have a great share of good Nature, though perhaps not an equal portion of Sense?

Qu. Whe­ther Mr. Sacheve­rell.17. Whether it would not be Heroick for all those Publick-spirited Gentlemen, to take up Mr. S—'s Reso­lution of never standing again 'till they can be chosen by honest Regulators only?

18. Whether the incapacitating Clause was not brought into the House by Mr. Sach — and whether the following List be not a true account of those that seconded him in it?

Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That every Mayor, Recorder, Alderman, Steward, Sheriff, Common-Council-man, Town-Clerk, Magistrate or Officer; who did take upon him to consent to, or joyn in, any such Surrender, or Instrument purporting such Surrender as aforesaid. Or did solicit, procure, prosecute, or did pay or contribute to the charge of prosecuting any Scire Facias, Quo Warranto, or Information in the nature of Quo Warranto, by this Act de­clared void, shall be, and is declared, adjudged, and Enacted to be for the space of seven years uncapable, and disabled to all Intents and Purposes, to bear, or execute any Office, Imployment, or Plate of Trust, as a Member of such respective Body Corporate, or in or for such respective City, Town, Burgh or Cinque-port, whereof, or wherein he was a Member, at, or before the time of making such Surrender, or Instrument pur­porting such Surrender, or the suing out, or prosecuting such Scire Facias, Quo Warranto, or Information in nature of Quo Warranto, any thing in this Act contained, or any other Case, Statute, or any Ordinance, Charter, Custom, or any thing to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding.

  • The Honourable Edward Russet, Esq
  • William Duncombe, Esq
  • Sir Henry Winchcombe, Bar.
  • Henry Powle, Esq
  • Sir Algernoon May, Knight.
  • Sir William Rich, Bar.
  • Sir Henry Fane, Knight of the Bath.
  • Thomas Tipping, Esq
  • The Hon. Thomas Wharton, Esq
  • Sir Thomas Lee, Bar.
  • Thomas Lewes, Esq
  • William Jephson, Esq
  • Sir William Drake, Kt.
  • Richard Hampden, Esq
  • John Hambden, Esq
  • Isaac Newton, Magist. Art.
  • Sir Robert Cotton. Kt. and Bar.
  • John Maynwaring, Esq
  • Roger Whitley, Esq
  • Hugh Boscawen, Esq
  • William Harbord, Esq
  • Edward Russet, Esq
  • Sir Henry Ashhurst, Kt.
  • Anthony Rowe, Esq
  • Hugh Fortescue, Esq
  • Robert Harly, Esq
  • Sir Peter Colleton, Bar.
  • Jonathan Prideaux, Esq
  • Sir John Lowther of Whitehaven, Bar.
  • Sir Henry Capell, Kt.
  • Sir Philip Gell, Bar.
  • The Honoura. Anchitell Gray, Esq
  • Sir George Treby, Kt.
  • The Honoura. Robert Russel, Esq
  • Sir Francis Drake, Bar.
  • Sir Walter Younge, Bar.
  • Thomas Reynell, Esq
  • John Elwell, Esq
  • Samuel Foote, Esq
  • Henry Trenchard, Esq
  • Thomas Trenchard, Esq
  • John Burridge, Esq
  • Sir John Morton, Bar.
  • John Manly, senior, Esq
  • Sir Matthew Andrews, Kt.
  • Henry Mildmay, Esq
  • Isaac Rebow, Esq
  • Sir Thomas Middleton, Kt.
  • Sir John Guise, Bar.
  • Sir Ralph Dutton, Bar.
  • Sir Duncombe Colechester, Kt.
  • Thomas Master, Esq
  • John How, Esq
  • Richard Dowdeswell, Esq
  • Sir Edward Harly, Kt. of the Bath.
  • Paul Foley, Esq
  • John Dutton Colt, Esq
  • John Birch, Esq
  • Sir Thomas Pope Blount, Bar.
  • Sir Charles Caesar, Kt.
  • Sir William Cowper, Bar.
  • Sir Thomas Byde, Kt.
  • The Honourable Sydney Wortley, alias. Mountague, Esq
  • The Hon. Sir Vere Fane, Kt. of the B.
  • Sir John Knatchbull, Bar.
  • Sir William Honywood, Bar.
  • Henry Lee, Esq
  • Sir Tho Taylor, Bar.
  • Charles Lord Brandon Gerrard,
  • The Hon. Richard Lord Colchester.
  • Bennet Lord Sharard.
  • Thomas Babington, Esq
  • Sir Edward Hussey, Kt.
  • Sir William Yorke, Kt.
  • Sir John Brownlowe, Bar.
  • Sir William Ellis, Bar.
  • The Hon. Philip Howard, Esq
  • Sir Patience Ward, Kt.
  • Sir Robert Clayton, Kt.
  • [Page 8]Sir Thomas Pilkington, Kt.
  • Sir William Ashurst, Kt.
  • Sir Henry Hobart, Kt.
  • George England, Esq
  • John Trenchard, Esq Serj. at Law.
  • The Hon. Sir Robert Howard, Kt.
  • Sir Thomas Samuel, Kt.
  • Sir William Langham, Kt.
  • Sir Francis Blake, Kt.
  • Sir Scroop How, Kt.
  • Sir John Cope, Bar.
  • Sir Thomas Lytleton, Bar.
  • Edward Gorges, Esq
  • The R. Hon. Charles Marq. of Winton.
  • The Hon. William Lord Pawlett.
  • Francis Morley, Esq
  • Fitton Gerrard, Esq
  • Henry Wallap, Esq
  • The Honour. James Russel, Esq
  • Sir Michael Biddulph, Bar.
  • Philip Foley, Esq
  • Henry Boyle, Esq
  • Sir Philip Skippon, Kt.
  • Sir Robert Rich, Kt. and Bar.
  • Sir John Duke, Bar.
  • Sir Richard Ounslow, Bar.
  • George Evelyn, Esq
  • John Arnold, Esq
  • Thomas Howard, Esq
  • Foot Onslow, Merchant.
  • Sir John Thompson, Bar.
  • Denzill Onslow, Esq
  • Sir John Pelham, Bar.
  • John Machell, Esq
  • John Lewkener, Esq
  • Sir John Fagge, Bar.
  • William Garway, Esq
  • Sir Richard Newdigate, Bar.
  • Sir Thomas Mompesson, Kt.
  • Thomas Pits, Esq
  • Sir Charles Rawleigh, Kt.
  • Morice Bocland, Esq
  • Sir William Pinsent, Bar.
  • Charles Godfry, Esq
  • Thomas Freke, Esq
  • John Wildman, senior, Esq
  • — Hawles, Esq
  • John Wildman, junior, Esq
  • Sir James Rushout, Bar.
  • Thomas Foley, Esq
  • William Bremley, Esq
  • John Somers, Esq
  • Richard Lord Coote.
  • Henry H [...]rbert, Esq
  • Edward Tompson, Alderman.
  • William Stockdale, Esq
  • Sir William Strickland, Bar.
  • William Palmes, Esq
  • Sir Michael Wharton, Kt.
Barons of the Cinque-Ports.
  • Richhard Austen, Esq
  • James Chadwick, Esq
  • Julius Deeds, Esq
  • Tho. Pappillon; Esq
  • Sir James Oxinden, Kt. and Bar.
WALES.
  • Sir William Williams, Kt. and Bar.
  • Bussy Mansell, Esq
  • Sir Rowland Gwynn, Kt.

Roger L'estrange's QUERIES CONSIDERED; AND Some Queries put, for the Consideration of those Per­sons, whose Judgments are in danger of being again Poysoned by the Snare of smooth Words; calcula­ted to the humour of a Biggot, for the helping the Indigent Case of King James, and Vindicating the Non-Abdicators.

1. WHether the Church of England ought not to be con­tent, and very grateful, that the King has so often declared himself for the Church of England, without obliging his Majesty on pain of their Displeasure (and no less a Scandal than Presbyterian in his Heart) to subjoyn a profess'd Abhorrence and inveterate Enmity against all his Dissenting Subjects?

2. Whether the Church of England or Dissenters have most made it their Business to Libel the present King, or whether indeed they ever did Libel him to the Degree of our Query-maker in his sixth Query; and whether it be the sin against the Holy Ghost, for the Dissenters to glory in the Friend­ship of their King, who has given them his Royal Word for his Favour and Protection in the Liberty of their Con­science, [Page 10]which is so much repined at, and the King so much hated for?

3. Whether it be really the Church of England (or our Query-maker only that makes her so) that makes her self a Sanctuary for all the Offenders of the last Reign? and if so, What she can answer to her excluding the late King James, while none of his Instruments are thought guilty enough to suffer, no, nor to be excluded doing the same things a­gain, if they have Opportunity?

4. Whether also it had not been as mannerly in our In­quirer to have set down a List of all those Members that stood in need of Indemnity 1660. to make out that it was a majority? or whether his Credit be good enough to pass without Proof, who stands in so much need of an Indem­nity himself, and of a Pillory now for traducing 146 Gen­tlemen of the House of Commons as Republicans or old Rebels, because against his Will they Voted his present Ma­jesty King, and took the Sword of Persecution out of the hand of the Church of England?

5. Whether his third Query be not insinuation enough to make the Church of England loath him, who foster up­on them his own Spirit of Blood and War, so contradicto­ry to the known and practised Doctrine of the Church, Charitiy and Passive Obedience? and what but Rebellion can this Libeller insinuate, when he says the Church of England will be esteem'd Cowards and Stupid, if they do not awake against those his Majesty has taken into his Protection?

6. Whether this Fellow is not a fit Person to be hugg'd by the Church of England, that shall boast in Print that our Army in Ireland are but Remains of Regiments, and proposing other means to reduce Ireland than giving Tax­es, ( viz. recalling K. James) if he does not mean that, we desire him to name those other means, not doubting his [Page 11]Majesty, as well as the Nation, will take it very kindly of him, to put us in a way to reduce the Kingdom without Money, or a way for Money without Taxes?

7. Whether any Dissenter ever denyed his fifth Query; or what his reason is for putting it; or how he will prove all those qualifications upon any Member of the House.

8. Whether it be fit for this Query-maker to call in que­stion the Actions of Parliament; and if it be, how he will make it out that the House changed the Right of Successi­on; and how will the Church of England answer to a Charge against their boasted Loyalty, for suffering an Impudent Scrib­ler to call the making his Majesty King, a Voting Queen Mary out of three Kingdoms; or whether this be not such an Affront to his Majesty and the present Government, as any Subject that has respect for either cannot but regret?

9. Whether it is not as likely they should be his Maje­sties Friends that Voted for making him King, as those that were against it; and whether ever the King told this Query-maker, he was sensible they had Republican De­signs in doing it?

10. Whether the Temper of those Members does not de­serve Censure, who were so hasty for a General Pardon, that they could not stay to think of making Inquisition for Blood, that so the guilt of all the Blood spilt in the late Tyranny might devolve on the Nation, but preferr'd their own security against the lash of the Law, to the just retribution that God Almighty expected from their hands, in whom he had placed the dispensing of Justice, and to the King's being just to his Declaration.

11. Whether it was not a sign of an excelling Loyalty in those Members who so carefully provided that the King should swear at his Coronation to protect the Bishops in all their Episcopal Rights, who at the same time refused to swear Allegiance to him, or to own him as their Head, [Page 12]and how much it went against the grain to have them suspended for it, is discernable in every Query he makes?

12. Whether Whipping Oats was not an Instance of Ty­ranny and Cruelty, in a Nation that of all the World pre­tends to Humanity, and to have no Tortmes practised; and whether the opposing that reversing Vote, was not more to shew their good Will than any Spleen to the Man him­self?

13. Whether if all these things do not unqualifie a Mem­ber for a place in the House, Qu. 6. Why being banished by the Cruelty of an Abdicated Tyrant, should unfit a Man for the Service of his Countrey, remains to be proved?

14. Whether the boasting of Loyalty and the Church of England may not evince a Factor for Popery, as well as saying, I am a true Engilsh Man, proves one to be none; and whether the Loyalty so lately in Vogue, and the Zeal for the Church, was not more in the Mouths of those very Men, who since in France and Ireland went openly to Mass, than in any other; and whether the Church of England are not now too much awake to be so ridden again?

15. Whether England is reduced to so much Exigence, as to make Composition for time with the States of Hol­land, for what they expended on our Account; and whe­ther this Gentleman is not for lessening our Figure in the World, and our Value abroad, which is indeed much for our Interest, by having a Message sent to the States, viz. May it please your High and Mightinesses, your poor and needy Brethren of England are not able yet to repay you, but if you will have Patience with them, they will be very honest, and pay you all. And further, Whether this Gentleman ever look'd over the Act for repaying the Dutch, to see how many Years it will be before they will have their Money?

16. Whether the Gentleman did not design to leave some unanswerable Query in his Paper, by not telling who did [Page 13]so, that so we might not examine the particular Case, and whether if any Member saw an Act of Parliament evaded, and the King cheated, as he was most loyally in that Bill, it was not a Noble and Generous Honesty to move for a just Review even among his best Friends?

17. Whether his 13th. Query has not a little Nonsense in it; and whether he can shew any particular quality in the Parliament of K. James the second, to distinguish them from all Parliaments that ever was, save that there was a full Brigade of Sword-men in it, for which he in particu­lar quarrels at this Parliament, in which are very few?

18. Whether any Man may not start Questions that no Man can Answer? or what Scruples any Man made at the Actions of K. James, which he so much repented of as to make him desist in Point of Conscience from standing at the last Election?

And for a Query by the way; Whether it is not like­ly they have some other end than a bare serving their Countrey in the House, who bid so high for Votes, that an honest Man that has no self-end cannot afford to give; and that for the pure and single benefit of Religion, and propagation of the Church of England, Debauch the Nati­on with drunken Treats, to engage them to choose them to sit in Parliament, that they may plead Priviledge in Barr of their just I do not mean Sir Peter Rich Debts; and whether this was not a grand Reason why a Bill for Regulating Elections has so often been offered, but could never Pass in the last House?

19. Whether the 15th Query be not the bottom of all the rest, and the onely Card they have to play, who watch for our Division to overturn the Government once again, in hopes of reaping the sweet Harvest of a com­mon Calamity, to make amends for their present Poverty, who formerly made great gain of the Pretence of Reli­gion. [Page 14] Hen! Quantum profuit haec fabula Christi?

20. Whether it is likely this Libeller shall be Judge of the good Nature or sence of the People of England, or that his Opinion must be the Standard of Elections to come?

21. Whether his Reflection on Mr. Sachaveril, and pub­lishing a List of Members, is not more their Honour and Vindication than Reflection, especially from his sordid Scandal on them in his second Query?

22. Whether, To give one Instance of the Ingenuity and Generosity of the Party this Fellow pleads for, it be not very remarkable, how our Four new Candidates for Lon­don stood by, and see a profligate drunken Fellow, that calls himself of the Church of England, bid the Sheriff of London, executing his Office with unquestionable and in­disputable Integrity, Kiss his Posteriors on the Hustings in Guild-hall, and not so much as Reprove him for it, much less Commit him, as they ought in Honour to have done? and whether in doing it they had not gained more Ho­nour, and more vindicable Credit, than by clandestine Calls on the Livery, forestalling of Votes, and Sunday Cabals, engaging an Interest for their Election?

23. Whether the Kings late Letter for the Reforming the Clergy and the whole Nation, has in it any such hor­rible thing, as to have it publickly called A damn'd Phana­tical Cant? And whether the Church it self ever pretended to be so Infallible as to need no such Admonition, or that no Reformation can be made in it, either in its Hierarchy or in its Members, that can fall short of Presbytery and Phanatioism?

24. Whether Dr. Sherlock's appearing in the Pulpit after a Deprivation by Act of Parliament, be not the Effect of the same Spirit; who being advised by the Learned in the Law, and permitted by his Superiours in the same Cir­cumstances [Page 15]dare openly affront the Government, and bid Defiance to an Act of Parliament, as a further Testimony of the Practice as well as Profession of the Doctrine of Passive Obedience?

Lastly, Why the Church of England, should after all the Publick Acknowledgments of their calling in the P. of O. and after their Solemn Joyning with him in his Enter­prize, and thanks to him for performing it, and to God for the Success, now strive to have it agreed, that he came in by Conquest, which is past my Learning to unriddle, and very little for the Honour of the Nation for them to ac­knowledge.

LONDON, Printed for John Palmer, 1690.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.