The Best name on Earth.
1. WE meet with four names in Scripture whereby the servants of God converted to embrace the Gospel, were called, before the time that my text was written. These took their denominations from the four Cardinall graces so necessary to mans salvation.
- 1. From their Holinesse Called Saints.
- 2. From their Faith Called Believers.
- 3. From their Love Called The Brethren.
- 4. From their Knowledge Called The Disciples.
From their Holinesse called Saints, [Page 2] Acts 9.13. I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy Saints at Ierusalem. Acts 9.32. He came down also to the Saints which dwelt at Lydda.
From their Faith called Believers, Acts 5.14. And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.
From their Love called the Brethren, Acts 9.30. Which when the brethren knew, they brought him down to Cesarea, and sent him forth to Tarsus. Acts 11.1. And the Apostles and brethren that were in Iudea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God.
From their Knowledge called the disciples. The number of the disciples was multiplied. Acts 6.2. Called the multitude of the disciples unto them. [Page 3] And in my text, And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
2. Observe in the words,
- 1. Who were called; The Disciples: all they, and onely they.
- 2. What they were called, Christians.
- 3. Where they were called, at Antioch.
- 4. And lastly, when they were called; First, neither sooner nor later, but just now when the Church so increased with the preaching of Saul and Barnabas.
We will chiefly insist on the second and third parts; and therein for the more conveniency, invert the Order, and begin first with the place called Antioch.
[Page 4]3. First then Negatively, not at Ierusalem, and that for two reasons.
First, because Ierusalem had lately lost its credit with the great God of Heaven, it was become Bankrupt in its reputation for her ingratitude to God, and cruelty to his servants, Matthew 23.37. O Ierusalem, Ierusalem, Thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not? Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. Yea it was utterly unfit that the name of Christians should begin, or be born in that place where Christ was so cruelly put to death.
[Page 5]4. Secondly, because Ierusalem was of a covetous, envious, and ingrossing nature, ready to monopolize and inclose all honour to it self. So that had the name of Christians first begun within the walls of Ierusalem, the Jews would have been ready alone to lay claim thereunto, excluding the Gentiles to have any participation therein. As Christ therefore suffered without the walls of Ierusalem, thereby proclaiming himself a publick good, not appropriated to that private nation, and for the same causes the name of Christians began not at Ierusalem but at Antioch.
5. Secondly, Negatively, The name began not at Rome. O how would the tide of Tybur have [Page 6] swollen beyond bounds and banks, had the name of Christ first begun from that Citie? How would the papists boast (though not without some cause) yet beyond all measure, that Rome in a manner was the godmother of true Religion, & gave her the name of Christianity? If a father cannot in his writings vail his bonnet in a civil respect to the citie of Rome, and give it a regardfull salutation, because it was the imperiall citie of the world; if an ancient Ecclesiasticall Historian cannot give it a Rhetoricall complement, in respect it was so famous a Church, and most ancient Patriarchall Seat, having precedency before, though not superiority above, all other Churches; [Page 7] I say, if in such cases their expressions are hailed and tugged by popish parasites, to signifie (contrary to the mind of the speakers) the primacy and infallibility of the Romish Church: how would they ere now have hollowed it into the eares of deaf men, & imperiously upbraided the Church of England, if the name of Christians had its rise from Rome, and originall in the walls thereof? But God hath marred their mark, and payred their pride, and blasted their boasting: Christians were first so called, not at Rome but at Antioch.
6. Here let us enquire orderly into two things,
- 1. What was Antioch.
- 2. What is Antioch.
[Page 8]What was it? I confesse there be many cities in Asia of that name, no fewer then seven and twenty, which I could easily demonstrate, were it not my work to preach heaven unto you, and not to read a Geography Lecture.
7. The reason why there were so many Antioches is this, because there were two Antiochusses successively, both puissant princes and eminent Emperours of Asia, who founding, repairing, and enlargeing severall cities, called them all after their own name. Besides, they had many friends and favourites who to ingratiate themselves with these princes, called the cities of their own erection after the names of Antiochus.
8. But the Antiochia mentioned [Page 9] in the text, is certainly known to be Antiochia in Coelosyria, so called, because lying in a hollow vale interposed between the mountains of Libanus and Antilibanus.
It was commonly called Antioch the great, and was a Metropolis for trade in those Eastern parts.
9. Come we now to consider what is Antioch.
It is a pittifull inconsiderable village, famous onely for what it hath been; the Churches therein are buried in their own Churchyards. It falleth so much under the notice of a Geographer, that it falleth not under it generally; omitted in most Mapps, except some charitable ones, which are pleased in pitie to take cognizance thereof.
[Page 10]Yea, which is worst of all, a sound Christian and orthodox in his judgement, is hardly to be found in that citie where Christianity first began. It is at this day infected with Mahumetisme, and such few sorry Christians as remain therein, are infected in the Fundamentalls of Religion: for they follow the Greek Church, and deny the procession of the holy spirit from the sonne, the second person in the Trinity.
Use 10. To teach humility to all places of greatnesse, not to confide in their own populousnesse, but to walk in humility before God, seeing Antioch the great, that voluminous citie, is now epitomized to nothing: yea, we may generally observe, that all [Page 11] cities that wear the sirname of Great, are beheld by God with a jealous eye: partly because greatnesse is a flower of the Crown of heaven; partly because great cities presume on their populousnesse to be great sinners; hoping in vain that their greatnesse will procure them an Act of Indemnity, and God be moved to let them alone, rather then to punish so many, enough to make the sword of his Justice turn edge, before, it can cut through them.
11. The premises I say have moved the great God of heaven to hold a strict eye, and heavy hand over all cities sirnamed Great; whilest lesser places, Zoars, escape best in general judgements: [Page 12] Nineveh the great, Jonah 3.3. Hamath the great, Rabbah the great, Babylon the great, Revel. 18.2. No the infinite, Nahum 3.9. And Antioch, by humane writers called Antiochia magna, are all reduced to ruines.
12. Give me leave to say to this citie of London, as Darius did to Daniel in a holy complement, O Darius, live for ever, that is, (understand it a finite ever) might he, in life, health, and prosperity, continue to the utmost possibility of nature. So say I, O London, last for ever, may it flourish as long as any place hath a subsistence in this sublunary world; however, let it not be high minded, but fear, seeing Antioch a place as plentifull, as puissant, as [Page 13] populous, is now dwingled away to an inconsiderable village.
13. Come we now to the name of Christians:
This will bear a double debate, first, whether it was imposed by the enemies of the Church in scorn and derision, or whether the Church it self did assume it as an act of their own election and approbation.
14. I conceive the first utterly improbable: for had the persecutours of the Church, the depravers of goodnesse and good men, given a name unto them, they would have invented and imposed one more defamatory, of greater shame and disgrace, as to call them Hereticks, Nazarites, Crucifictians, and the like; and not so [Page 14] noble a name as Christians.
By the way we may observe, that the word Christian is used twice in the Bible, or if you will, but once and an half. Once, 1 Pet. 4.16. Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorifie God on this behalf. The half time, Acts 26.28. when Agrippa said, Thou hast perswaded me almost to be a Christian. In both which places we find the word taken in an honourable acception, nothing of shame being imported therein; which perswades us to believe, the name was never fastened on Gods servants by their professed enemies.
A second enquiry succeeds, viz.
15. Whether this name was by [Page 15] divine injunction immediately bestowed upon them, or whether the Church meeting together, by a prudentiall Act, with a joint consent assumed it upon themselves.
I confesse at the first reading, I conceived the text in the Original favoured the former, where I read [...]: now [...] sometimes containeth divine inspiration therein, and is so used Matth. 2.12. [...]: And being warned of God in a dream. This, I say, inclined me to believe the name of Christians to be revealed from God, and by him immediately imposed on the disciples.
16. But on second thoughts, I find the word sometimes to import [Page 16] no more then a plain denomination. And so it is used, Rom. 7.3. [...], she shall be called an adulteresse; which moveth me to believe, that without any such immediate revelation from heaven, in an extraordinary manner, in the manifestation of Gods will, the Apostles there present, by the assistance of Gods spirit within them, and the generall consent of the Church about them, assumed that name upon themselves.
17. Possibly because many believed, some of the Circumcision and some of the Uncircumcision; and because Gentiles was a name odious to the Iews, and Iews offensive to the Gentiles: therefore the word Christians was pitcht upon [Page 17] as common to both, to bury the former names under it: for though Iew and Gentile did ever remain as words of civil distinction, they were henceforward abolished, as terms of hatefull disparity.
Quest. 18. But why were they not called Fatherians from God the Father, or holy Ghostians from the holy Ghost? why onely Christians from Christ the second person in the Trinity? here, if any return that they are too harsh and ill sounding, too troublesome and tedious to be pronounced, the answer is in no degree satisfactory to the question.
For, first, were our tongues as long accustomed to the pronunciation of these words, as they [Page 18] have been used to the word Christian, a very lisping utterance would easily be able to expresse them.
Secondly, we in England within these last fifteen yeares, have acquainted our tongues with as hard terms, with as numerous syllables, & some of Latine, others of Greek extraction, ( Presbyterians, Antinomians, Independents, Representatives, &c.) and yet these go down glib with us in our common discourse.
Answ. 19. The true answer is this, we are called Christians from that person in the Trinity, that hath merited most in the redemption of mankind.
20. And here farre be it from me to make odious comparisons [Page 19] betwixt the persons in the Trinity, and their deserts towards us, which have most indeared us unto them. That person who hath done least for us, hath done more for us then we can requite, then we can deserve, then we can expresse, then we can conceive; however, may dust and ashes in all humility confesse this most necessary and comfortable truth, that Christ the second person in the Trinity, is the best friend we have in the Court of Heaven, and hath both done and suffered most in the effecting our salvation.
21. Thence is that expression of David, Psalme 110.1. The Lord said unto my Lord, sit thou at my right hand, untill I make thy enemies thy footstool. The Lord, that is, [Page 20] God the Father, said to my Lord, that is to God the Sonne, to Iesus Christ; indeed one can take but little comfort in the Lord, if not for my Lords intercession. The Lord considered in his greatnesse and justice, is our enraged enemy, affording us cause of fear and sadnesse, till beheld as reconciled in our Lord unto us.
22. Now it will plainly appear, that Christ hath performed most for mankind in order to our Salvation.
For, first, in operibus ad extra, in all outward actions, Christ the second person in Trinity hath an equall share with the other two. Thus Christ, as well as the other two persons in Trinity, created the World, and all therein, John 1.1, 2, 3. In [Page 21] the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
23. Secondly, we are justified by Christ, as well as by God the Father, Gal. 2.17. But if while we seek to be justified by Christ, we our selves are also found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sinne? God forbid.
24. Thirdly, we are sanctified by Christ as well as by the holy Ghost: for as it is said, Rom. 15.16. Being sanctified by the holy Ghost; so it is said, 1 Cor. 1.2. To them that are sanctified through Christ Iesus.
25. Hitherto we have proved, That Christs goodnesse came paralell [Page 22] with the other two persons in Trinity, in their relation to mankind, creating, justifying, and sanctifying us: now it remains that we shew what Christ hath peculiarly done and suffered for us. And this will plainly appear, if we consider, how three parts of four in the Creed, are made up of our Saviours performances for our salvation, wherein he alone had a personall interest.
26. Christ it was, who was conceived of the holy Ghost, Christ it was who was born of the Virgin Mary; Christ it was who suffered under Pontius Pilat; Christ it was who was crucified, dead, and buried; Christ it was who descended into hell; Christ it was who the third day rose again from the dead; Christ it is who sitteth on the [Page 23] right hand of God almighty; Christ it shall be, who shall come to judge both the quick and dead: And thus we see, that the greater part of the Creed is but a Chronicle of Christs achievements for mankind, from whom we are justly called Christians.
27. But some will say, grant it fit that Gods servants should be denominated from the second person in Trinity, yet, why are they not called Iesuites from Iesus, rather then Christians from the name of Christ?
28. I answer, The name of Iesus which signifies a Saviour, is not of so transitive a nature as the word Christ is, nor can it be so properly applyed to men, without some suspition of blasphemy, and confining thereupon; Iesus importeth [Page 24] a Saviour, Christ importeth anointed; now every servant of God cannot be termed a Saviour, but may properly be called a Christ, and an anointed.
29. This may be proved from the expression of David, Psal. 45.7. Thou lovest righteousnesse, and hatest wickednesse, therefore God, thy God hath anointed thee with the oyl of gladness above thy fellows. See we here, That Christ being anointed above his fellows, implieth that his fellows were also anointed, though in an inferiour proportion; though the grand shower of graces fell onely on the head of our Saviour, yet some stragling drops did light on all them who truly believe in him, so that every Saint of God is a little Christ or anointed,
[Page 25]30. They may also be called Christians, that is the professours of the faith, maintainers of the doctrine which Christ delivered to his Apostles, and endeavourers to imitate the examples which he set before them.
31. Here we must not forget how the heathen made another deduction, and etymologie of the word Christians; for such pagans, in the Primitive times, beholding the love and charity betwixt Christians, how they mutually relieved each others wants; but especially, how they conversed together in the time of plagues and epidemicall diseases, comforting one another, when heathen people started from the embraces of their nearest relations: I say, seeing this, [Page 26] they conceived they were called Christiani quasi Chrestani, from [...] the Greek word for mild and meek, as more mercifull men, more pittifull and compassionate persons then any others.
32. But alasse, should heathens now look on the carriage and conversations of Christians one towards another, how spitefull and cruell we are, how Bearish, how Borish, how Brutish we are in our mutuall dissentions, they would conclude us not called from meeknesse; so ill we broke our names.
33. Come we now to the uses of what hath been delivered, which may serve to confute two sorts of people.
- First, Those that are ashamed of the name Christians.
- [Page 27]Secondly, Those that are ashame to the name Christian.
For the first, We charge this on the account of the Church of Rome, let them get it off as they can. For the word Christian in the citie of Rome, is taken to be a term of disgrace, a note or brand of infamy; so that when they will disparage a person, they call him a See the Rhemish Testament, and Dr. Fulk in his Annotat. on this verse, Acts 11.26. citing one Christophorus Francius for the justifying of this observation. Christian, which amounteth to as much as a silly fellow, a mean man, a man of no parts or endowments.
34. And will you know the true cause thereof? It is this; All pregnant wits of able and active parts, or of high and honourable parentage, [Page 28] enter themselves into some Order: if men, of Benedictines, Dominicans, Franciscans, Carmelites, Iesuites, &c. if women, Bridgittians, Clarians, &c. so that besides the name of Christians, they have an addition from their Order to distinguish them from the common sort of people. And if they be Seculars of any considerable Eminency, then are they known by their dignities of Arch-deacons Bishops, Cardinalls, &c. So that such plain poore people which are without welt or guard of any such Religious Accessions, are called Christians, as uselesse in the Church, save as ordinary persons without any degree or dignity therein. Thus Christian passeth there for the civillest expression of a fool, and doth [Page 29] not Rome shew her self to be Antichristian to purpose, where the name of Christian passeth for a term of dishonour, or at the best of diminution?
35. In the second place we charge it on our Romish adversaries, that they are ashamed of the name Christian, because they write themselves Dominicans, Franciscans, Carmelites, &c. pleasing and priding themselves in those titles, whilest the name of Christian (though not actually disowned) is disused by them, and left in silence and obscurity.
36. But here the Romanists turn our own Ordinance against us, and assault us with our own weapons. They heavily accuse us for being ashamed of the name Christian, because [Page 30] calling our selves Lutherans, Calvinists, Hugenotes, Protestants, Remonstrants, Antiremonstrants, &c. Thus as Mary complained, John 20.13. They have taken away the Lord, and I know not where they have layd him. They charge us that we have left out and lost Christ, under those many strange names we have assumed to our selves.
37. I must enlarge my self in answer to this Objection. And first I lay down this Foundation, that we never took these names unto our selves, but they were fixed and fastned on us by the spleen & envy of our Romish adversaries; and here we appeal to any unbiassed person to be judge betwixt us, whether this be fair and ingenuous dealing of the Papists? who first [Page 31] asperse us with such nicknames, first call us so, and then accuse us for being called so. And this will plainly appear, upon a particular examination of the aforesaid names.
38. To begin with Lutherans and Calvinists. This we say. We acknowledge Luther and Calvin two eminent instruments of Gods glory in their generations; whereof the first was more then a common man, armed cap a pe, with a couragious spirit, to break through, and rout the ranks of the Romish superstitions. However, we utterly disclaime to be called by their names: call us Lutherans, call us Calvinists, call us Protestants, or what they please, we stand silent, and return no vous aves, as [Page 32] utterly unconcerned in that call, onely we sind our tongues, when termed Christians: For the disciples were called Christians first at Antioch.
39. We reade a passage Isaiah 4.1. much appliable to this purpose. And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, we will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel, onely let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. Here we may plainly perceive, that it is the prerogative Royall of the Husband alone, and part of his Maritall priviledge to have his wife denominated from him. God therefore who is a jealous God, may justly be suspitious of our Church her loyalty, if offering to be named from any other, but from Christ her Husband.
[Page 33]40. What saith John the Baptist? John 3.29. He that hath the Bride is the Bridegroom: but the friend of the Bridegroom which standeth and heareth him, rejoyceth greatly, because of the Bridegroomes voice, this my joy therefore is fulfilled. We allow Luther and Calvin friends of the Bridegroom, shining and burning lights, starres of the first magnitude, but Christ alone is the Husband, the Bridegroom to whom our Church humbly and heartily applieth it self, triumphing to be called after his name alone.
41. Come we now to the third term of Protestants, wherein we take no delight, as cast upon us by our adversaries. Here first, we confesse that in a generall sence all the Saints of God may be termed [Page 34] Protestants. S. Paul himself was one, 1 Cor. 15.31. I protest by your rejoycing which I have in Christ Iesus our Lord, I die daily. Protestation is no more then a solemn and serious profession of the truth.
42. But the name of Protestants, as imposed on those of our Church, had this originall. The German princes being in war with Charles the fitfh Emperour, drew up an Instrument which they called a Protestation, containing a Breviate of the Articles of their Religion, in opposition to the superstitions of the Church of Rome; and this they protested jointly to defend, with their lives and estates: hereupon their Adversaries termed them Protestants; a term now extended to all of their perswasion: [Page 35] but it can never be proved that we took that name to our selves, or took any delight or contentment therein, as too narrow a name of party, whilst Rechoboth, God hath made us room in the word Christians, seeing that we rejoice in the latitude and comprehensivenesse thereof.
43. As for the name Hugenots, it was imposed by the Papists on the servants of God, who declining the common superstition repaired privately to S. Hughs gate at Toures in France, there secretly to here Sermons, and receive the Sacrament. But it cannot be evidenced, that ever they of the Reformation in that countrey, appropriated the name to themselves, or did ever style or write themselves [Page 36] by that Appellation; the same may be said of the remaining names, which without our consent, yea against our wills, have been fastned upon us.
44. Here I will not descend to those petty names of private Sects, which these last ten yeares have produced, nor will I honour them with any mention. Chiefly, because as the youngest of discretion in this congregation, may remember the beginning of such names, I hope the oldest may live to see the end of them, when such ridiculous and absurd names shall utterly be abolished.
45. Come we now to the second sort to be confuted; namely, such as are a shame to the name of Christian, and these may be reduced to three ranks.
- [Page 37]1. The Profane.
- 2. The Ignorant.
- 3. The Factious.
To begin with the first. Such may justly forfeit the title of Christian, whose works confute the word, and conversations contradict their denominations; let such either live as they are called, Christians, or be called as they live, Pagans.
46. Scipio the worthy Conquerour of Africa, had a son that had nothing of his father but the name, being cowardly dissolute, and given to all debauchery. It happened that he came into the Senate-house with a ring on his finger, wherein the picture of his father was most lively made; where the Councel, by an Act of State, commanded [Page 38] him to forbear the wearing of it, adjudging it unfit that he should wear his fathers picture, who would imitate none of his fathers virtues.
47. I am sorry the story is too naturall to be applied, and your meditations have prevented me herein. Let them no longer abuse the name of Christ, but desist from making any further use thereof, except they will make a Reformation of their lives, with all possible speed, to an acceptable proportion.
48. Secondly, it confutes the ignorant, which wear the name of Christ, yet can give no account of Christ, from whom they were so named; demand of them a reason of their denomination, [Page 39] and they are utterly unable to return any satisfaction.
49. Laban being questioned for his cozonage by his nephew Jacob, for substituting Leah in stead of Rachel, had nothing to plead for himself, Gen. 29.26. Save onely that it was the custome of the countrey not to marry the younger first. So were some countrey people taken to task, and seriously catechized about the cause of their names, they would render no other reason, but the custome of the place they lived in; it hath been fashionable say they for many hundred of years, our fathers, grand-fathers, Great grand-fathers, time out of minde, have been called Christians, and we succeed, as to their lands, so to their appellations.
[Page 40]50. It is sad there should be so much darknesse in our land of Goshen, where the Gospel hath been so plentifully preached, and publickly professed: these things I could as heartily wish they were false, as I do plainly know they are true.
51. Lastly, it confutes those who are factious, and willingly and wilfully make rents in the Church; how can these without apparent usurpation be intitled Christians?
52. Well, to conclude, let us leave off all by-names of parties, interest and factions, and return to our best, largest, and ancientest name of Christians: best, because no doubt imposed, if not by the command, by [Page 41] the consent of God himself, and therefore good reason it should alwaies continue as an honourable denomination. We reade, Gen. 2.19. That whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. It seemeth he gave them expressive and significant names, such as were breif definitions of their natures, or else God would have reversed and revoked them, and not have suffered them to stand and remain; seeing therefore the name of Christians was given by a greater then Adam, being, if not jure divino, at the least jure apostolico, by the joint concurrence of the apostles thereunto, let it last to all posterity.
53. Yea, as this is the best name, [Page 42] because the best men were the authours thereof, so is it also, because of the best matter contained therein, the name Christian well understood, it preacheth a double Sermon unto us.
- 1. It putteth us in mind of what Christ hath done for us, and the many benefits we obtained by his life, death, resurrection, and intercession.
- 2. It is a remembrancer unto us of what we should do for Christ, in gratitude to the many favours he hath done for us.
54. Secondly, Christians, it is the largest name, it takes in all Christs little flock within the compasse thereof, agreeing in the same fundamentall doctrine, [Page 43] though there may be difference betwixt them in unimportant controversies, where the errour doth not intrench on salvation; though their opposites may unmercifully censure and condemn them for the same. O! if God were not more mercifull to us then we are charitable one to another, his flock would be so little, it would not deserve the name of a flock.
55. 3. It is the ancientest proper name; Believers, Saints, Brethren, Disciples, they were but epithites and appellatives; and though they still be in being and lustre, yet they are all out-shined with the word Christian, the best, largest and ancientest name for all of our profession; And the Disciples were first called Christians at Antioch.