Hereupon Complaint being made to the House that some persons returned for Members, were not admitted into the House; upon the question it was Resolved, That those persons should make their Application
[Page 13] to the Council for Approbation.
Hereupon several of the Members that were chosen to serve in Parliament, and not Returned, published a Remonstrance, wherein they claimed the priviledge of the Antient Fundamental Laws, and their BirthRight as Freemen of
England. But the Remonstrance being much too large to be here inserted, I shall only present you with one or two Paragraphs, as a Specimen of those brave
Hero's Resolution against a
Protectorian Invasion: And the greatness of their Courage, and brave English Gallantry, will be the more conspicuous, if we consider this was done when the then Protector was in his Zenith; when almost all
Europe trembled before him; and he gave Law to the Neighbour-Princes; when he had in his hand that Thunder that had shook the Nation off her very Foundations; And the House too filled with those who either were,
[Page 14] or seemed to be his Creatures: Yet in a general Defiance of this so potent Conquerour, did those Noble Patriots (amongst other things) Remonstrate.
When our Worthy Ancestors have been met in Parliaments, and have found Oppression and Tyranny supported by such strong hands, that they could not prevail to secure their Countries, Lives and Liberties by wholsom Laws, they have often made their Protestations against the Injustice and Oppression; and forewarned the people of their danger. In like manner, we who have been duly chosen by the people to be Members of the Parliament, that should now have met, and have an undoubted Right to Meet, Sir, and Vote in Parliament, although we are Oppressed by Force of Arms, and shut out of the usual place of Parliament Sitting; yet having Hearts sensible of that highest Trust reposed in us, and being filled with
[Page 15] Cares for the
Church and Commonwealth, which with grief of heart we behold bleeding; we do hold our selves bound in duty to God, and our Country, to declare unto the People of
England, their and our woful condition, and the most evident danger of the utter Subversion of Religion, Liberty, Right, and Property.
We believe the Rumour is now gone through the Nation, that Armed men employed by the L. P. have prevented the free Meeting and Sitting of the intended Parliament, and have forcibly shut out of doors such Members as he & his Council supposed would not be frighted or flattered to betray their Country, and give up their Religion, Lives, and Estates to be at his Will, to serve his Lawless Ambition. But we fear that the Slavery, Rapines, Oppressions, Cruelties, Murthers, and Confusions that are comprehended in this horrid Fact, are not so sensibly
[Page 16] discerned, or so much laid to heart as the case requires; and we doubt not, but as the common practice of the Man hath been, the Name of God, and Religion, and formal Fasts and Prayers will be made use of to colour over the Blackness of the Fact: We do therefore in faithfulness to God, and our Country hereby Remonstrate;
First, That whereas by the Fundamental Laws of this Nation the People ought not to be bound by any Laws, but such as are freely consented u
[...]to by their chosen Deputies in Parliament, and it is a most wicked Usurpation, even against the very Laws of Nature, for any man to impose his
Will or
Discretion upon another as a Rule, unless there be some Pact or Agreement between the Parties for that intent. And whereas by the Mercy of God only, in preserving this Fundamental Law and Liberty, the good People of
England have beyond memory of
[Page 17] any Record, preserved their Estates, Families, and Lives, which had otherwise been destroyed at the will of every wicked Tyrant; and by keeping this only as their undoubted Right, they have been kept from being brutish Slaves to the lusts of their Kings, who would otherwise have despoiled them of their Persons, Lives, and Estates by their Proclamations, and the Orders of themselves and their Council. Now the
L. P. hath by force of Arms invaded this Fundamental Right and Liberty, and violently prevented the meeting of the peoples chosen Deputies in Parliament; and he and his Council▪ boldly declare;
They know it to be the undoubted Right of the People to trust whom they think fit, and as much
[Page 19] the Right of every man duly chosen and trusted, to meet and Vote in Parliament, without asking their Leave, or begging their Tickets. And although there have been frequent Secret Designs for many years to subvert Religion, Liberty, and Property in this Nation; and to that end the Designs of Tyranny have attempted to destroy sometimes the Being, sometimes the Power, Priviledges, and Freedom of Parliaments; yet the Mercy of God hath almost miraculously preserved the Being, Priviledges and Authority of Parliaments, and therein Religion, Liberty, and Property, until the time of the Lord Protector.
But now he hath assumed an Absolute Arbitrary Soveraignty (as if he came down from the Throne of God) to create in himself, and his Confederates, such Powers and Authorities, as must not be under the cognizance of the peoples Parliaments. His Proclamations he declares
[Page 20] shall be binding Laws to Parliaments themselves; he takes upon him to be above the whole Body of the people of
England, and to judge and censure the whole Body, and every Member of it, by no other Rule or Law than his pleasure, as if he were their Absolute Lord, and had Bought all the people of
England for his Slaves. Doubtless he would pretend only to have conquered
England at his own Expence; and, were there as much Truth as there is Falshood in that pretence, yet he could not but know that the Right of the peoples Deputies to their Antient Powers and Priviledges would remain good against him, as against their publick capital Enemy▪ Whom every man ought to destroy, until by some agreement with the the Body of the people in Parliament, some sort of governing Power in him were submitted unto, that hereby he might cease to be a publick Enemy and Destroyer, and become
[Page 21] a King, or Governour, according to the conditions accepted by the people; and if he would so pretend, he could not be so discharged from his publick Enmity by any Conditions or Agreement made with a part of the Peoples chosen Deputies, whilst he shut out the other part; for no part of the Representatives Body are trusted to consent to any thing in the Nations behalf, if the whole have not their free Liberty of Debating and Voting in the Matters propounded.
If he would pretend no higher than to be our Conqueror, who for Peace and his own safety's sake, was content to cease from being a publick Enemy, and to be admitted a Governor, he would not compass those ends by forcibly excluding (as now he does) whom he pleases of the Representative Body of the People, who were to submit to him on the Peoples behalf; therefore he either takes upon him to be such a Conqueror as scorns
[Page 22] the Peoples acceptance of him by their Representative as their Governour, and fears not to remain a publick Enemy, or else he takes himself to be such an unheard of Soveraign, that against him the people have no claim of Property or Right in themselves, or any thing else; for he hath now declared, that the peoples choice cannot give any man a Right to sit in Parliament, but the Right must be derived from his gracious Will and Pleasure, with that of his Councellors, and his Clerks Ticket only must be their evidence for it.
Thus hath he exalted himself to a Throne like unto God's, as if he were of himself, and his power from himself, and we were all made for him, to be commanded and disposed of by him, to work for him, and serve his Pleasure and Ambition.
By this may be easily discerned the Opinion he had of the Illegal and Arbitrary proceedings of
O. C. and how much of the sufferings of the
[Page 24] Loyal Party would have been prevented, had that point of a free Parliament been then gained: His Majesties Restauration must have been the natural consequence of it. The constant correspondence he always kept with the Royal Party, and that almost to the hazard of his Life and Family, are sufficient Testimonies of his sincerity to his Masters Interest and Service.
His House was a Sanctuary for distressed Royalists, and his correspondence with the Kings Friends (though closely managed, as the necessities of those times required) are not unknown to those that were the principal managers of His Majesties Affairs at that time.
The Eyes of the great States-men were so much upon him, that he was one of those Loyal Persons mentioned by
Baker in his Chronicle, whereof the Council of State was composed; in which List we find General
Monk to be the foremost; and that Council the Chronologer calls men of Integrity, and well affected to Kingly Government: And he that will but consider how soon His Majesties Restauration ensued upon the
[Page 27] Election of this Council, will have good reason to be of the same Opinion. And in the 673 page we find him to be one of the Nine of the Old Council of State, who sent that encouraging Letter to the said General, to promote his undertaking for the Advantage of the Three Nations. Again, we find him in the List of that Council of State consisting of Thirty Nine, upon whom an Oath was endeavoured to be Imposed for the Abjuration of the Royal Line, but by the Influence of Sir
Anthony Ashly Cooper, and General
Monk, upon Coll.
Morly, that Oath was opposed in Council, as being a snare, and against their Consciences. This was strongly pleaded by the Soberer part of the Council, whereof this great Patriot was one, and so an end was put both to that Oath, and to the Council. Nor is it in the least unknown to persons then in being, how much his Advice influenced the Councils of those times.
At the time of His Majesties Restauration, as a most signal Testimony of His Majesties good Sentiments of his former Actions, he was Advanced to be one of the first Rank in His Majesties most Honourable Privy Council, and was placed above His Majesties Royal Brother, the Duke of
Gloucester, and even Gen.
Monk himself, whom His Majesty used to call his Political Father. And about three daies before His Majesties Coronation, he was in the Banquetting-house created Baron
Ashly of
Wimbourn St.
Giles's; and another addition of Honour was conferred on him (
viz.) Lord
Cooper of
Paulett; And at last in the
[Page 30] year 1672. he was made Earl of
Shaftesbury, at the same time when Duke
Lauderdale, the Earl of
Arlington, and the Lord
Clifford were promoted. To his happy Councils do both King and Kingdom owe for the happy Conduct of things for divers years; so that now he seemed to be incorporate into the heart of his Prince; the Events of his Advices were commonly agreeable to what he at first proposed; so that it may be said of him as was spoken of
Polibius, that (as
Scipio) so the King seldom miscarried in any thing that was carried on by his Advice; so that at length he seemed to be the Royal Oracle. In fine, such was the Opinion which his wise Administration had gained, that as he sate in one of the highest places in his Masters favour, so he was preferred to the highest Trust of Honour in the Kingdom; he was made Chancellor of the
Exchequer, and afterwards Lord High Chancellor of
[Page 31]
England, about the beginning of the Year 1672. Now was the Kings Conscience (as it were) entrusted to his care and management; this was the highest Orb a Subject was capable to move in; but with what Sagacity, Honour and Integrity he acquitted himself in that great Employment, the Transactions of the Court of
Chancery at that time can best witness. Justice ran in an equal channel, the cause of the Rich did not swallow up the Rights of the Poor, he that was oppressed found Relief, and the Oppressor a Rebuke suitable to his crime; the usual delays of that Court were much abated, and all the Transactions thereof were managed with the greatest Judgment and Equity.
As an Instance of his constant adhering to the Interest of his Master, and the
commune Bonum, or Weal of the publick, you may take a copy of his Thoughts from that excellent Speech made by him in favour of
[Page 32] the Subject in the
Exchequer, Jan. 24. 1673. at Baron
Thurland's taking the Oath, a copy whereof follows.
His particular Application to prevent any misunderstanding between the King and his Parliament, is very obvious to any that shall but look into his Speeches to the Parliament during his Chancellorship, and with how great concern he still vindicated his Masters Actions: He acquitted himself in all the great Emergencies of this High Employment with that universal Applause and satisfaction, as seldom happens to men in such an envied station: The vilest of his Detractors not being able to fasten any Imputation upon his conduct in those great and weighty Trusts he was advanced to.
Thus having gradually traced the Advancement of this great Minister to the highest pitch of Honor, where he appeared
sicut Luna inter Stellas minores. I shall now take notice of his Relinquishment of that High Employment, and what other contingencies have happened to him since.
Mr. Justice
Jones, Mr. Justice
Wild, Lord Chief Justice
Reimsford; Mr. Justice
Twisden was absent, but he desired Justice
Jones to declare that his Opinion was, that the Party ought to be remanded, which being the sense of the Court, his Lordship was Remanded by the Court.
[...] Address was offered in the
[Page 79] Names, and by the Order of the Peers under named, (
viz.)
- Kent,
- Huntingdon,
- Bedford,
- Clare,
- Stamford,
- Shaftesbury,
- Say
and Seal,
- Eure,
- North & Grey,
- Chandos,
- Grey,
- Howard,
- Herbert,
- Rockingham,
- Townshend,
- Holles,
- Delamer,
And was personally presented to His Majesty by four Earls, and five Barons, (
viz.)
- Huntingdon,
- Clare,
- Stamford,
- Shaftesbury,
- North & Grey,
- Chandos,
- Grey,
- Howard,
- Herbert.
With whom the Earl of
Bedford had personally joyn'd, but that by a sudden indisposition he was prevented.
[Page 80]It was delivered by the Earl of
Huntingdon, in the name of the rest of the subscribed Lords. And they were introduced to His Majesty by his Highness Prince
Rupert.
His Majesty was graciously pleased to return this answer:
‘That he would consider of what they had offered, and could heartily wish that all other People were as sollicitous for the Peace and Good of the Nation, as he would ever be.’
But on the Twelfth His Majesty, of his Princely Wisdom, thought fit to prorogue the Parliament, from the 26 of
January, until the 11th of
November next ensuing.
Near this time this Noble Peer recovered out of a violent and dangerous fit of sickness.
So endless were the designs and Conspiracies of the Papists against this Noble Peer, that notwithstanding they met with many disappointments
[Page 81] in their Attempts, the Almighty Providence protecting his Innocence from their
[...]ellish Machinations, that now another Female Agent is discovered for Tampering with Mr.
Dugdale to retract what he had sworn before King and Parliament, towards the detection of the damnable popish Plot, the sum of Two Thousand pounds was offered him, by one Mrs.
Price, and divers great persons named by her to be security for the payment of it, in case he would sign such a Recantation, and affix the
Odium of a Protestant or Presbyterian Plot on some of the Protestant Peers, and others of known Loyalty and Integrity to their Prince and Country; particularly on the Right Honourable the Earl of
Shaftesbury. Of which
[...] rous design Mr.
Dugdale (being at that time touched with some remorse at such a horrid Villany) gave his Lordship an account, which occasioned the miscarrying of that foul
[Page 82] and traitorous Enterprise. Nor were they wanting in their famous Method and Artifice, in calumniating and throwing dirt on the Reputation of this Noble Peer, which is a faculty they are very famous for; and on the account of which they may particularly value themselves;
[...] For now a Pacquet of base Libels, and Treasonable Reflections, were by the
Penny-Post transmitted to a Printer, and Copies of the same dispersed about the parts of
Westminster, full of venemous and malicious slanders, and Imputations, tending to the taking away the life of this Protestant Earl, and divers other Peers of Right Honourable Account: But the Printer detesting so black a design, published an Invitation to any person that would detect the Author, or publisher of that infamous Libel.
And now we are got into such a Bog of Plots, Sham-plots, Subornations and Perjuries, as the History
[Page 83] of no Age can parallel. 'Twas the mode for discarded Varlets, Irish Skip-kennels, and indigent extravagants to be treated, and treating one another with no less than the Assurances of vast and mighty Fortunes, and Employments in places of Trust and Honour, on condition they would lustily swear the Plot upon the Presbyterians; but none of these cursed projects were ever proposed, but the Earl of
Shaftesbury was principally (though with many other Noble Heroes) to be charged as the chiefest Agent in it.
To this purpose
David Fitz-Girald, one of their notorious Evidences, endeavours both by Bribes and Threats, to draw divers others of his Countrey-men and Complices to join with him in the Catholick Design. They had been disappointed at the Ponyard and Pistol, nor could have opportunity to dispatch him that way: the remembrance of
Sir Edmund-Bury Godfreys Cravat,
[Page 84] and the Assassination of Justice
Arnold, were caution sufficient to any discerning Protestant; and now that method had been so shamefully and notoriously detected, and cast such a just
Odium upon their party, other means must be attempted: nothing so suitable to their Genius as an Oath; and it is no marvel if those who can't ordinarily discourse without discharging loud
[...] of Blasphemies and Execrations, the embellishment of whose comm
[...]ik is the Rhetorick of their
[...] and Dam
[...]e's: If such (I say) should at some
[...] or other make their loose Breath serve them to better purpose, and swear themselves into Estates and Offices.
Fitz-Girald had store of Guinnys, he ch
[...]nks them lustily, and shews them to Mr.
Hetherington, besides divers Five-pound-pieces of Gold, telling him this should be done to the man that was loved; with divers other Invitations to come over and
[Page 85] transfer the popish Plot in
Ireland on the Protestants. This was deposed by Mr.
Hetherington before the Lord Mayor of
London.
In
January before the meeting of the Parliament at
Oxford, we find the Earl of
Shaftesburys hand amongst other Noble Peers, affixed to a Petition and Advice to His Majesty, requesting His Majesty that the Parliament might
[...]it at
W
[...]minster. And because the
[...] Petition and Advice
[...] all through it such unque
[...]able marks of a most tender Duty and
[...]ction to His Majesties person. It may not be improper here to insert it, to obviate the evil surmises of some, who would stain the most loyal performances with imputations of a contrary nature.
At the delivery of the Petition and Advice, the Right Honourable the Earl of
Essex is said to have made the following Speech.
May it please Your Majesty,
THe Lords here present, together with divers other Peers of the Realm, taking notice, that by your late Proclamation your Majesty hath declared an Intention of calling a Parliament at
Oxford; and observing from Histories and Records, how unfortunate many such Assemblies have been, when called at a place remote from the capital City; as particularly the Congress in
Henry the Seconds time at
Clarendon: Three several Parliaments at
Oxford, in
Henry the Thirds time; and at
Coventry, in
Henry the Sixths time, with divers others, which have proved very fatal to those Kings, and have been followed with great mischief to the whole Kingdom: And considering the present posture of Affairs, the many Jealousies and Discontents which are among the People, we
[Page 87] have great cause to apprehend that the consequences of sitting of a Parliament now at
Oxford, may be as fatal to your Majesty and the Nation, as those others mentioned have been to the then Reigning Kings; and therefore we do conceive that we cannot answer it to God, to your Majesty, or to the People, if we, being Peers of the Realm, should not on so important an occasion, humbly offer our Advice to your Majesty; that if possible, your Majesty may be prevailed with, to alter this (as we apprehend) unseasonable Resolution, The Grounds and Reasons of our Opinion, are contained in this our Petition, which we humbly present to your Majesty.
To the Kings most excellent Majesty. The humble Petition and Advice of the Lords undernamed, Peers of the Realm.
Humbly sheweth,
THat whereas your Majesty hath been pleased, by divers Speeches and Messages to your Houses of Parliament, rightly to represent to them the dangers that threaten your Majesties Person, and the whole Kingdom, from the mischievous and wicked Plots of the Papists, and the sudden growth of a foreign Power; unto which no stop or remedy could be provided, unless it were by Parliament, and an Union of your Majesties Protestant Subjects, in one mind, and one Interest.
And the Lord Chancellour, in pursuance of your Majesties commands, having more at large demonstrated
[Page 89] the said dangers to be as great as we, in the midst of our fears, could imagine them; and so pressing, that our Liberties, Religion, Lives, and the whole Kingdom would certainly be lost, if a speedy provision was not made against them.
And your Majesty on the
21st of
April, 1679. having called unto your Council many Honourable and Worthy Persons, and declared to them, and to the whole Kingdom, That being sensible of the evil effects of a single Ministry, or private Advice, or foreign Committee, for the general Direction of your Affairs, your Majesty would for the future refer all things unto that Council, and by the constant Advice of them, together with the frequent use of your great Council the Parliament, your Majesty was hereafter resolved to govern the Kingdom: We began to hope we should see an end of our Miseries.
But, to our unspeakable grief and
[Page 90] sorrow, we soon found our expectations frustrated; the Parliament then subsisting was prorogued, and dissolved, before it could perfect what was intended for our relief and security: And tho another was thereupon called, yet by many prorogations it was put off till the
21st of
Octob. past; and notwithstanding your Majesty was then again pleased to acknowledge, that neither your Person, nor your Kingdom could be safe, till the matter of the Plot was gone through: It was unexpectedly prorogued on the
10th of this Month, before any sufficient Order could be taken therein: All their just and pious Endeavours to save the Nation were overthrown, the good Bills they had been industriously preparing to Unite your Majesties Protestant Subjects brought to nought: The discovery of the Irish Plots stifled: The Witnesses that came in frequently more fully to declare that, both of
England and
Ireland discouraged,
[Page 91] Those foreign Kingdoms and States, who by a happy conjunction with us, might give a check to the French Powers, disheartned, even to such a despair of their own security against the growing greatness of that Monarch; as we fear may enduce them to take new Resolutions, and perhaps such as may be fatal to Us: the Strength and Courage of our Enemies, both at home and abroad, encreased, and our selves left in the
[...]tmost danger of seeing our Country brought into utter desolation.
In these extremities we had nothing under God to comfort us, but the hopes that your Majesty (being touched with the groans of your perishing People) would have suffered your Parliament to meet at the day unto which it was prorogued, and that no further interruption should have been given to their proceedings, in order to their saving of the Nation: But that failed us too; so then we heard that your Majesty
[Page 92] had been prevailed with to dissolve it, and to call another to meet at
Oxford, where neither Lords nor Commons can be in safety, but will be daily exposed to the Swords of the Papists, and their Adherents, of whom too many are crept into your Majesties Guards. The Liberty of speaking according to their Consciences will be thereby destroyed, and the validity of all their Acts and Proceedings (consisting in it) left disputable. The straitness of the place no way admits of such a concourse of persons as now follows every Parliament: The Witnesses which are necessary to give Evidence against the popish Lords; such Judges, or others, whom the Commons have impeached, or had resolved to impeach, can neither bear the charge of going thither, nor trust themselves under the protection of a Parliament, that is itself evidently under the power of Guards and Souldiers.
[Page 93]The Premises considered, We your Majesties Petitioners, out of a just abhorrence of such a dangerous and pernicious Council, (which the Authors have not dared to avow) and the direful apprehensions of the calamities, and miseries that may ensue thereupon; do make it our most humble Prayer and Advice, that the Parliament may not sit at a place where it will not be able to act with that freedom which is necessary; and especially to give unto their Acts and Proceedings that Authority which they ought to have amongst the people, and have ever had, unless impaired by some Awe upon them (of which there vvants not precedents;) and that your Majesty would be Graciously pleased to order it to
[Page 94] sit at
Westminster, (it being the usual place, and where they may consult vvith Safety and Freedom.
And your Petitioners, &c.
- Monmouth,
- Kent,
- Huntingdon,
- Bedford,
- Salisbury,
- Clare,
- Stamford,
- Essex,
- Shaftesbury,
- Mordant,
- Ewers,
- Paget,
- Grey,
- Herbert,
- Howard,
- Delamer.
In
October, during the Session of the last Parliament, it is very remarkable, that
Francisco de Faria, Interpreter to the
Portugal Ambassadour, amongst other high matters relating to the popish Plot, gave it in his Information at the Bar of the House; He declared that the said Ambassador had tempted him to kill the Earl of
Shaftesbury, by throwing
[Page 95] a Hand-Granado into his Coach, as he was passing the Rode into the Country.
And about the 20th of
Novemb. one
Zeal being called to the Bar of the House delivered his Information at the Bar, the purport whereof was this: That being a Prisoner in the
Marshalsea, Mrs.
Cellier came divers times to him, and treated with him, not only to be Instrumental himself, but to procure others to Assist him to fire His Majesties Ships as they lay in the Harbour; as also to swear against the E of
Shaftesbury, such Art
[...]es of High Treason as she should get ready prepared for him, or to that purpose.
To sum up the many various Methods and Waies that were devised, and put in execution to cut off the Life of this Noble Peer, would be Task enough to fill many Volumes. The Jesuites (next to the Attempting His Majesties Life) set all their Inventions and Engines on work, to
[Page 96] make away the Earl of
Shaftesbury; he was the Beam in their Eye, the Clog that hindered the motion of their Curst Designs. What have they not attempted that might render him distastful to the King? throwing the foulness of their own Treasons upon him, as appears by the Deposition of
Brian Haines before the Council in
Octob. 1681. That
David Fitz Girald told the said
Brian Haines, that he the said
Fitz Girald possessed His Majesty, and had given it under his hand and Seal, that the late Plot was a Presbyterian Plot, and Invented by the Right Honourable
Anthony Earl of
Shaftesbury, on purpose to Extirpate the Family of the
Stuarts, and dethrone his present Majesty, and turn
England into a Common-wealth, or else set the Crown upon the Earls own Head; with more to this purpose, of which we shall have occasion to make farther mention, when we come to the Tryal of the said Earl; and shall
[Page 97] therefore now hasten to the Meeting of the Parliament at
Oxford, where Business of as high nature was agitated, as ever came before the consideration of a Parliament, no less than the preservation of the King's Majesty, the Protestant Religion, and the good people of
England; all which were now, as much as ever Invaded by the Bloody Designs of the Papists.
This Parliament met the 21th of
March 1681. in the ConvocationHouse at
Oxford. The House of Lords Sare in the Geometry School, where was a Throne and State Erected for His Majesty, in which His Majesty being Seated in His Royal Robes, declared himself to both Houses to the Effect following.
That the unwarrantable Proceedings of the last House of Commons were the reason of his parting with them; for that he who would never use Arbitrary Government himself, would not suffer it in Others. That
[Page 98] whoever calmly considered the Assurances he had renewed to that last Parliament, and what he had Recommended to them; His Forein Alliances, the Examination of the Plot, and the Preservation of
Tangier, and reflect upon their unsuitable Returns, might rather wonder at his Patience, than that he grew weary of their Proceedings; that it was his Interest, and should be his Cause as much as Theirs, to Preserve the Liberty of the Subject, the Crown not being safe when that is in danger. That by Calling this Parliament so soon, he let them see, that no Irregularities of Parliament should make him out of love with them; by which means he gave them another opportunity to provide for the Publick Security, and had given one Evidence more that he had not neglected his part.
That he hoped the ill Success of former Heats, would dispose them to a better Temper. That as for the further prosecution of the Plot, Trial of
[Page 99] the Lords, &c. he omitted to press them, as being obvious to consideration, and so necessary for the Publick Safety: But desired them not to lay so much weight upon any One Expedient against Popery, as to determine that all other were ineffectual.
That what he had so often declared touching the Succession, he should not recede from. But that to remove all reasonable fears that might arise touching the possibility of a `Popish Successor, if means could be found out that in such a case the Administration should remain in Protestant hands, he should be ready to hearken to any such Expedient by which Religion might be secured, and Monarchy not destroyed.
Lastly, He advised them to make the known and Establisht Laws of the Land, the Rule and Measure of their Votes.
The 22th. the Commons having chosen their Speaker, presented him to His Majesty in the Lords House.
[Page 100] Little beside was done until the 25. when the House considered an Act for Repeal of the Act 35
Eliz. which had passed both Houses in the last Parliament, but had not been tendered to His Majesty for his Royal Assent. A conference was desired with the Lords, as to matters relating to the constitution of Parliaments in passing of Bills.
Another Message was ordered to be sent to the Lords, to put them in mind, that the Commons had form
[...]ly by their Speaker demanded Judgment of High Treason at their Bar, against the Earl of
Danby; and therefore to desire their Lordships to appoint a day to give Judgment against him the said Earl, upon the said Impeachment.
The same day the Examination of
Edward Fitz-Harris, relating to the popish Plot was read in the House, upon which the said Examination was ordered to be Printed, the said
Fitz-Harris to be impeached
[Page 101] at the Lords Bar, and a Committee appointed to draw up Articles against him.
But the House of Lords rejected the Impeachment of Mr.
Fitz-Harris, whereby a stop was put to their proceedings. And on the 28th in the morning, the Commons were sent for to the House of Lords, where His Majesty told them, That their Beginnings had been such, that he could expect no good success of this Parliament, and therefore His Majesty thought fit to dissolve them. And my Lord Chancellor having declared them dissolved; His Majesty came the same night to
WhiteHall.
I must beg the Readers pardon, if he think I have in this Relation deviated from my Theam, which was the Earl of
Shafton; but nothing of a popish Plot hath been yet brought upon the stage, wherein he hath not been level'd at; he certainly knowing how destructive the Interest of
[Page 102] the Papists is to the Government and People of
England, hath set himself, to the hazard of his Life and Family to oppose them. The next thing that appeared on the Booksellers stalls was a paper with this Title.
The Protestation of the Lords
Upon rejecting the Impeachment of Mr.
Fitz-Harris, giving for Reasons, why it was the undoubted Right of the Commons so to do; because great Offences that influence the Parliament, were most effectually determined in Parliament, nor could the complaint be determined any where else: For that if the party should be indicted in the
KingsBench, or any other inferiour Court, for the same offence, yet it were not the same suit; an Impeachment being at the suit of the People, but an Indictment at the suit of the King. Besides that, they conceived it to be a denial of Justice, in regard that the
[Page 103] House of Peers as to Impeachments, proceeding by vertue of their Judicial, not their Legislative, Power, could not deny any suitor, but more especially the Commons of
England, no more than the Courts of
Westminster, or any other inferiour Courts, could legally deny any suit or criminal cause, regularly brought before them. Signed according to the Printed Copy by the following Peers.
- Monmouth,
- Kent,
- Huntingdon,
- Bedford,
- Salisbury,
- Clare,
- Stamford,
- Sunderland,
- Essex,
- Shaftesbury,
- Maclefield,
- Mordant,
- Wharton,
- Paget,
- Grey
of Wark,
- Herbert
of Cherbury,
- Cornwallis,
- Lovelace,
- Crew.
Finding the Earl of
Shaftesburys Name, amongst the other Noble
[Page 104] Peers and Patriots; I thought it not improper to insert the copy in this place, it being the last Act of that great Man upon the publick stage; For since that time he hath rather been passive, as will further appear by the remaining Discourse: We shall only remember, that at his return from
Oxford the Earl left a massy piece of Plate as a Gift to
Baliol Colledg, as also did that Heroick Prince
James Duke of
Monmouth, which will be to posterity a Testimony of their Magnificence and Bounty.
And now to return to what remains, for the finishing this Tragical story, I shall mention only what is already printed, either in Captain
Wilkinson's Information,
Colledg's Trial, or else is matter of Fact, or set forth in the Trial of this great Peer himself. Only I cannot omit that on the
15th of
Aug. 1681. Mrs.
Fitz-Harris gave a deposition upon Oath, that her Husband a little before his Execution, not only told
[Page 105] her what great offers he had made him if he would at first have charged that Infamous and Treasonable Libel, for which he was after executed, on this worthy Peer, and the Lord
Howard; but that he also advised her to do it as the only means to save his Life, though he protested at the same time that they were wholly innocent. She likewise deposeth that a certain Gentleman, whose Name shall be for born assured her that she should have what summs of Money she pleased, if she would accuse the Earl of
Shaftesbury, and Lord
Howard, as the Authors of the said Libel: But they have tampered with so many on the account of this baffled Design, that it's impossible but their consults should take wind, especially when we consider they were a people, that either to supply their necessities, or feed their ambition, or more probably through an irresistible Fatality, had blab'd and discovered the very
Arcana of Holy
[Page 106] Mother, and had spoke so unseasonably just in her
[...]ip, that they had spoiled her Game. What security could the Romish Sophisters have, but that these crackt Vessels would prove as leaky again, when under the force of a Temptation? But they had such a Modly of Evidences, as is almost comical to consider. There were the
Mac's and the
Mounsieur's, the Midwife, and the Priest, the skipkennel, and the Newgate-Birds, the Justice, and the Bog-trotter, the Counte▪s and the Kitchin Wench. No discourse was heard among them, But Captains places, Deanries, Rewards, Gratuities, Preferments, and as much Money as you will. They were advanced from Bonny-Clapper to Clarett, and Frontineack; from Torneps and Oat cakes, to Oysters & Pheasants; from Brogues and Bandle, to Velvet, and Cloath of Silver. They discoursed of his Majesty as if they had been of his Council, and of his great Ministers, as if
[Page 107] had been their Confederates. But there hath been so much said of these, upon Depositions taken before divers of the Magistrates of the Nation; that I shall take no farther notice of them before I proceed to Captain
Wilkinson's Information; only insert one passage of
David Fitz-Girald, and it was given in upon Oath, by Mr.
E. E. who hath approved his Loyalty to the King, upon many occasions, and in divers difficult and tempting Instances, his Deposition was, That
David FitzGirald told him▪ he would swear Treason against the Earl of
Shaftesbury, and procure others to do the like, and that if he would second him in the said Accusation, he should be highly considered. Such was the Impudence of this wretched man▪ not only to seek the Lives of the Innocent, and to reflect upon his superiours, but to procure and subo
[...] mercenary Souls to involve themselves in the same cursed and Diabo lical Designs.
[Page 108]Captain
Wilkinson was a Gentleman that had always espoused the Royal Interest, and hazarded his Life and Fortune in the service of his Prince; but having not had that success that a brave and industrious man might expect, he applied himself to the Proprietors of
Carolina, to obtain an Employment in that Country, and upon that score had a promise of the Lord
Shaftesbury, (in consideration of his great sufferings for His Majesty) of a considerable and honourable Employment there; but was unfortunately made a Prisoner in the
Kings-Bench for Debt, before he could enter upon that Employment; of which he gives a satisfactory account in his Information, a breviate of which take as follows from the Printed Narrative:
This person (being known to be under very ill Circumstances, and in some measure acquainted with the Earl of
Shaftesbury) they thought very proper to work over to their
[Page 109] design, for (could they have obtained it) his Evidence (having been a person of a standing credit) would have struck deeper than all the
Mac's about the Town: Therefore on the 8th of
Octob. 1681. one
Walter Bains came to him at the
KingsBench Prison, and after some infinuating discourse, told him, that he could not but know much of the Lord
Shaftesbury's Designs against the King; and that he might do well to discover it to him; that he had an Interest with the Lord
Hyde, and had lately been with Mr.
Graham, by which it seems the Captain apprehended what was the meaning of his kindness, but constantly asserted that he knew nothing of my Lord
Shaftesbury's Designs against His Majesty, but had cause to believe the said Earl loves his Majesty, for that he was always pleased to shew the Captain Respect upon account of his services to the King.
Mr.
Bains continued his importunities
[Page 110] on the same Subject to the Captain, until near night, and then left him full of great assurance, and promises to see him in few daies; not much questioning the Captains knowledge of the Earls Design.
W. Narrat. On the 11th of the same month one
Booth came to him upon the same design, and after much discourse told the Captain, he had now an opportunity to do himself a greater kindness than ever, for he might have either 10000
l. or 500
l. per Annum settled on himself or his Heirs, if he would but discover what he knew of the Lord
Shaftesbury, and his Design, in changing the Government to a Common-wealth, and witness against him: He further told him, now was the time to do something that would advance him, for it must now be a King or a Common-wealth; much more was then urged to induce the Captain to it, to which he gave such Answers as might encourage
Booth
[Page 111] to go on with his Proposals. In the mean time the Captain imparts this Affair to another person in the
King's-Bench, and desired him to put it in writing, (lest he should be tempted with what offers were made) that in such case if he should ever declare that he knew any thing of a Design against the King by the Lord
Shaftesbury, that then this person should witness the Truth against him, the said Captain; and further, that the Captain would still give the said person a full account of all Negotiations about that Affair. Mr.
Booth told him, he must appear at Court, and he should have an assurance of a Reward from some persons of Honour; the Captain told him, he would not trust any Courtier he knew for a Groat.
W. Narrat. On the 12th of
Octob. they were at the Captain again, and plied him with Wine and good words, to work upon him to come in a Witness against the L.
Shaftesbury
[Page 112] telling him, he might be assured of what he desired from the E. of
H. and the L.
H. He told them, if they would give him 20000 Guinys towards his own, and his friends losses, by Injuries sustained, he would▪ discover what he knew; but still said he knew nothing of any Design by my Lord
Shaftesbury.
Much more was transacted in this matter, as is more at large set forth in the Captain's Information. But at length they came on the 15th day with a Warrant, which the Marshal shewed him, whereby he was compelled to go to
Whitehall. In a short time after his coming thither, he was conducted to Mr. Secretary
Jenkins's Office, where was also my Lord
Conway, who very fairly and honestly interrogated him concerning what he knew about my Lord
Shaftesbury, and of any Design against His Majesty; he gave the same Answer to them as he had done to the former Attackers, that he knew nothing;
[Page 113] great Arguments were used, but he could give no satisfactory Answer, as (he conceived) was expected. In a little time His Majesty came into the Office, and was pleased to say to the Captain, that His Majesty knew him well, that the Captain had served his Father, and His Majesty faithfully, and he hoped the Captain would not decline his Obedience. To which the Captain answered, that he never deserved to be suspected: His Majesty was pleased further to tell him, he had not had the opportunity to serve his Friends, but hoped he might: His Majesty was pleased to promise to consider him for his sufferings. Then after an excellent Exhortation, in which His Majesty told him that the kindness was intended, was not with design to speak a word but Truth it self, and if he knew the Captain, or any other person did, he would never endure them: His Majesty demanded what he knew of a Design against his Person
[Page 114] and Government? he answered, he knew nothing of any Design against His Majesties Person or Government; that he admired why one that had so faithfully served His Majesty, and Royal Father, both in
England, and beyond Sea, and was so Instrumental to His Majesties Restauration, should be suspected. But some persons had possessed His Majesty, that the Captain was deep in some Design against the Government, and knew much of my Lord
Shaftesbury: At length after much pressing, His Majesty told him, if he would say, As he hoped to be saved, he knew nothing of any Design against his Person, that then His Majesty would believe him; which the Captain having said in the very words, His Majesty seemed to be much surprized at it, and left him to the management of the Secrery, who used such Arguments as he thought fit: At last the Captain declared that he knew his Duty to his Soveraign, and would never draw
[Page 115] his Sword against him, but could freely do it against some of the Court, who were Enemies both to His Majesty and his Friends. So he was taken into another Room, where were His Majesty, Lord Chancellor, Lord
Hallifax, Lord
Hide, two Secretaries of State, and Lord Chief Justice
Pemberton; Mr.
Graham, Booth, and
Baines were present. My Lord Chancellor would not believe but that he must be guilty of knowing great things against the Lord
Shaftesbury; he told them, if he could not be believed on his word there, if they pleased to bring my Lord
Shaftesbury to his Tryal, he should declare in open Court upon his Oath, what his knowledge was, without any hopes of gain or Advancement; the Lord Chancellor wittily replied, there were two sorts of Advancements, and he was like to come to his own Tryal first, before the Lord
Shaftesbury. My Lord Chancellor demanded, if he had no
[Page 116] Commission for this New Service against His Majesty, to which the Captain answered, No. Then the Chancellor told him, he was to have a Troop to consist of Fifty Men; the Capt. said that was a small Troop; he hoped, if ever he had Command of a Troop, it should be a better than that: But the Captain desired to know, who gave that Information. The Lord Chancellor told him, Mr.
Booth, who was (by, and) Listed under him. Captain
Wilkinson desired
Booth to tell him, whether he had given this Information upon Oath,
Booth answered, Yes, and it was true. At all this the Captain was not concerned: so much doth glorious Innocence triumph over the Forgeries, and Impious Designs of Evil men, and out-braves them even in Death it self.
That which is very observable in Captain
Wilkinsons Information, is, That at that very time when
Booth had sworn he was to have commanded
[Page 117] a party of Horse at
Oxford, his whole Family, Wife, Children, and Servants, making about the number of 37 persons, were all on Board his Ship, bound for
Carolina, and all lying at his proper charge; but when he thought himself most in readiness for his intended Voyage, he found himself strangely entangled, that he could not stir, some Debts he was bound for for others, and more of his own fell upon him, and he was committed to the
Kings-Bench, which put a stop to the designed Voyage; and he hath often since concluded there was a Divine hand in it.
I have thought it proper to insert in this place the Testimony of Major
Jervas James, whose Loyalty and Integrity to his Majesty hath been sufficiently known, having most faithfully, and as a true Subject, served His Majesty both beyond the Sea and at home, and declares is still ready with all chearfulness (when his
[Page 118] Majesty shall please to command him) to serve him to the last drop of his Blood. He acknowledgeth himself a Son of the Church of
England, as is it by Law established, and hath without scruple taken the Oaths of Allegiance, and Supremacy. He stiles the acquaintance he hath with so deserving a person as Captain
Wilkinson, a great Happiness, and acknowledgeth himself obliged to him for so timely entrusting him with so notable a secret, being a stranger to the said Captain, which trust Major
James lookt upon as a great Adventure, and the Discovery to endanger the Lives both of the Earl of
Shaftesbury, and Captain
Wilkinson. He likewise declares, before God and Man, that he believes all the Captains Information to contain nothing but the truth of what he had from
Booth, Bains, and Mr.
Graham: For he lent him the convenience of his Chamber to write the whole business, and saw him write it with his
[Page 119] own Hand; as may also be witnessed by Mr.
Robert Bennet, who is an Officer in
Leaden-Hall-Market, and transcribed it for the Captain. He hopes his Majesty is, and will be, well satisfied, that those who faithfully and truly serve His Majesty, and his Subjects, are the persons both to be believed, and relied upon, and desires that this may have credit, according to its Truth and Reality, both in the heart of his Majesty, and all his loyal Subjects.
The Information of
Jervas James, Gentleman.
I Jervais James, Gentleman, do declare, that the above named Captain
Henry Wilkinson came to me upon
Tuesday, the
11th of
Octob. 1681. in the Evening, and did then, and likewise every day from time to time afterwards, make me acquainted with the several Treaties and
[Page 120] Transactions between him the said Captain
Henry Wilkinson, and Mr.
Booth, Mr.
Bains, and Mr.
Graham▪ and the several other Persons in this his Information mentioned; and that they were the very same in substance with what he hath herein set forth & declared; for at his Request, & for my own satisfaction, I kept a daily Journal during the time of their Treating. All which shall be attested upon Oath when required.
This forementioned Information was published by Captain
Henry Wilkinson, during the time of my Lord
Shaftesbury's confinement in the Tower, and was of very great use to satisfie all loyal and honest minded men, of the base and detestable practices of those evil minded persons, against his Life; and in how dreadful a condition would the Nation have been, if through the means of these, or such like Witnesses, the guilt of shedding Innocent Blood
[Page 121] should have been drawn upon us; & where would the rage of the Papists have ended, had they succeeded in this their horrid attempt?
Abo
[...]t the 29th of
July, 1681. the Right Honourable
Anthony Earl of
Shaftesbury was apprehended at his own House by a Serjeant at Arms, and carried before the King and Council, and after some Examination he was committed to the
Tower, upon a charge of High Treason; the Right Honourable the Lord
Howard having been committed before, upon an Information that he had assisted in contriving Mr.
FitzHarris's Libel, and
Stephen Colledg, and Mr.
Rouse having likewise been committed about the 25th of the same Month. It is said, that some days after his Lordships commitment, that as he was taking the Air in the Tower, meeting accidentally with one of the popish Lords, he was asked by him, what his Lordship did there, and that they little
[Page 122] thought to have had his good compan
[...]; to which the E. of
Shaftesbury replied, that he had lately been very ill of an Agu
[...], and was come there to take some
Jesuits Powder. It was said, tha
[...] during the whole time of his Lordships consinement in the Tower, he appeared to be very chearful, and that many times he assumed a Courage and Vivacity, beyond what could have been expected, from a person labouring under such violent pains and diseases, as is well known his Lordship is frequently troubled withal.
And now that we may not omit to you with what other Methods and Designs they endeavoured to fasten the black & Hellish figure of a Traitor on this loyal Peer, it will not be improper to take notice of a passage in the Trial of Mr.
Fitz▪ Harris, where Mr.
Everard upon Oath affirms, that Mr.
Fitz-Harris had told him; that horrid Libel was to have been fathered upon the Protestant
[Page 123] Nonconformists, and when Collonel
Mansel had deposed, that Sir
William Waller had said the design of
Fitz▪ Harris's Libel, was against the Protestant Party, Mr. Attorney▪ General replied, we believe it,
The Protestant Party. And how far this Peer was to have been concerned in that, will further appear, if we take in what Sir
William Waller affirmed at the said Trial, that Mr.
FitzHarris had told him, there were two Parliament Men which frequented my Lord
Shaftesbury's, whom his Lordship did not suspect, that came and sounded him, and then returned to the French Ambassadour, and acquainted him with all they could discover.
On
Thursday the 24th of
Novem. 1681. the great Affair for which the Lord
Shaftesbury was committed to the Tower, was tried at the Sessions House at the
Old Bayly: It may be excusable if we be the more particular and large in this matter, and insert
[Page 124] so much of the said Trial as may be needful to satisfie the World of the fairness and equity of the Proceedings of the Kings Court in that Affair; and we shall be somwhat the larger, because all persons, into whose hands this Book may come, may not have seen what was printed of that Trial. The Grand Jury that were to make enquiry both in behalf of the King and the Earl, were persons of unstained Loyalty and Integrity, and persons so considerable for their Estates and
[...]ortunes, that such a Jury hath seldom been empanelled upon the like occasion: The Names of the Grand Jury were as followeth:
-
Sir Samuel Barnardiston,
- John Morden,
- Thomas Papillion,
- John Dubois,
- Charles Hearle,
- Edward Rudge,
- Humphrey Edwin.
-
[Page 125]John Morrice,
- Edmund Harrison,
- Joseph Wright,
- John Cox,
- Thomas Parker,
- Leonard Robinson,
- Thomas Shepheard,
- John Flav
[...]l.
- Michael Godfrey,
- Joseph Richardson,
- William Empson,
- Andrew Kendrick,
- John Lane,
- John Hall.
The Oath.
You shall diligently enquire, and true presentment make, of all such Matters, Articles, and Things, as shall be given you in charge, as of all other Matters, and Things as shall come to your own Knowledge, touching this present service; The Kings Council, your Fellows Council, and your own, you shall keep secret; you shall present no person for Hatred or
[Page 126]
Malice, neither shall you leave any one unpresented, for Fear, Favour, or Affection, for Lucre, or Gain, or any hopes thereof, but in all things You shall present the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, to the best of your knowledg. So help you God.
My Lord Chief-Justice gave a large and learned charge to the Jury, wherein he first opened to them the Nature of their Commission, and the extent of it, which reached to all Offences whatsoever against the Law of the Land, as Treasons, Misprisions of Treasons,
&c. He told them, he would at present acquaint them with the nature of those Bills they were then like to be troubled with, and their Duty concerning that Enquiry; He told them they were matters of High-Treason, a crime of the greatest and highest nature that could be committed against man; other crimes, as Fellonies,
[Page 127] Riots,
[...], and
[...] of that nature,
[...]
[...]
[...] ders and troubles, in a State o
[...]
[...] dom; but he told them
[...] struck at the Root and Life of
[...] It tended to destroy the very Government, King, and Subjects, and the Lives▪ Interest, and Liberties of all; and therefore ha
[...]
[...]een always looked upon as a crime of the m
[...]st notorious nature that ca
[...] be whatsoever, and accordingly Pu
[...]shments have been appointed
[...]or it, of the highest and severest extremity. He told them our Ancestors thought it Wisdom to enact and declare what should be accounted Treason▪ and enumerated several Acts of that nature; at length he came to an Act made the 13. of this present King:
‘That if any one should c
[...]pass, imagine, or intend the Death of the King, or his Destruction, or any bodily harm that should tend to his Death or Destruction, or any maiming or wounding his Person,
[Page 128] any Restraint of his Liberty, or any Imprisonment of him; or if any should design, or intend to Levy any War against him, either within the Kingdom, or without; or should design, intend, endeavour, or procure any Forein Prince to Invade these h
[...]s Dominions, or any other of the King's Dominions, and should s
[...]gnifie, or declare this by any Writing, or by any Preaching, or Printing, or by any advised, malicious speaking, or words; this shall be High Treason.’
He told them the Intention of Levying War, was not Treason, before this Act, unless it had taken Effect, and War had been actually Levyed; and then as to the Designing and Compassing the King's Death, that was not Treason, unless it was declared by an Overt Act: As to the Imprisoning, or Restraining the Liberty of the King, they of themselves were not High Treason; but now by this Law they were made so, during
[Page 129] His Majesties Life; and the very designing of them, whether it take Effect, or no, though it be prevented (before any Overt Act) by the timely Prudence of the King, and his Officers, though it should be timely prevented, that there is no hurt done; yet the very Design, if it be but uttered, and spoken, and any waies signified by any Discourse, that this was made Treason by this Act. Formerly it was said, and said truly, That words alone were not Treason, but that since this Act words that import any Malicious Design against the King's Life, or Government, any Traiterous Intention in the Party, such words are Treason now within this Act.
Then as to the Indictments that were to be brought before them, he advised them to consider, 1. Whether the matter contained in them, and which were to be given in Evidence, were matter of Treason within the former, or the latter Act of
[Page 130] Parliament: and if they doubted, they were to enquire of the Court, and they should be directed as to matter of Law. And they were to examine whether the matters Evidenced to them were Testified by two Witnesses, for without two Witnesses, no man could be Impeached within those Laws: If one man should swear to words that import
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...] D
[...]sign or Intention,
[...]
[...]
[...] time, and in one place, and another Testifie to Traiterous words spoken at another time, and another place; that these were two good Witnesses, which had been solemnly resolved by all the Judges of
England upon a solemn occasion.
2. That they were to enquire, whether upon what Evidence should be given them, there should be any reason or ground for the King to call the persons to account; if there were probable ground, it was as much as they were to enquire into.
[Page 131] He urged pretty much to this purpose, and then told them Compassion or Pity was neither their Province, nor his; that there was no room for that in Enquiries of such a nature, that it was reserved to a Higher and Superiour Power, from whence theirs was derived: Therefore he required them to consider such Evidence
[...] should be given them; and prayed God to direct them in their Enquiry, that Justice might take place.
Then a Bill of High
[...]son reason was offer'd against the E. of
[...]esbury, and Sir
Francis Withc
[...] moved, that the Evidence might be heard in Court.
Then the Lord Chief Justice told the Jury that the King's Council desired (and they could not deny it) that the Evidence might be publickly given, and prayed them to take their places, and hear the Evidence that should be given.
The Jury desired a Copy of their
[Page 132] Oath, which the Court granted, and then withdrew, after some time they returned, and then the Clerk called them by their Names. Then the Foreman gave the L. C. J. an account, that it was the Opinion of the Jury, that they ought to Examine the Witnesses in private; and it hath been the constant practice of our Predecessors to do it; and they insisted upon it as their Right to Examine in private, because they were bound to keep the K's Secrets, which could not be done, if the Examination were in Court. Whereupon the L. C. J. told 'em, that perhaps some late usage had brought them into that Errour, that it was their Right, that the Witnesses were alwaies sworn in Court, and surely (he said) Evidence was alwaies given in Court formerly: That it was for their advantage, as well as the King's, that nothing might be done clandestinly; that by their keeping Counsel, was meant keeping secret their own private Debates.
[Page 133]To which the Foreman replied, That he begg'd his Lordships pardon, if he were in a mistake: The Jury apprehend they were bound by the very words of their Oath, to Examine in private; for it says, They shall keep the King's Secrets, and their own Counsels; That there could be no Secret in publick. Then Mr.
Papillion spoke to this purpose, That they had heard, that what had been the Custom of
England, had been the Law of
England; and if it had been the Antient Usage and Custom of
England, that had never been altered from time to time. Divers other Arguments were used on both sides; but at last the Court denied a private Examination; then the Foreman told the Court, that the Jury desired it might be Recorded, that they had insisted upon it as their Right, but if the Court overruled it, they must submit. This was likewise refused by the Court. Then Sheriff
Pilkington desired that
[Page 134] the Witnesses might be put out of Court, and called in one by one, but he was refused it, and told it was not his Duty. And Mr. Attorney General said, he appeared against the King. However, it was afterward granted to the Jury. Then was Read the Indictment against
Anthony Earl of
Shaftesbury, for High Treason against His Majesty, which being too long here to insert, we are forced to omit.
The Jury desired a
[...]ist of the Witnesses Names, but they were told, they would have them Endorsed on the back of the Indictment, when that was delivered to them. Then the Foreman acquainted the Court, that the Jury desired a Copy of the Warrant, by which the Earl of
Shaftesbury was Committed, because there might several Questions depend upon it: But my Lord Chief Justice answered, That was not in the power of the Court to grant, for that it was in the hands of the Lieutenant
[Page 135] of the
Tower, which he kept for his Indemnity, and they could not demand it of him upon any terms. Then Mr.
Papillion moved that they might hear what the Witnesses had to give in Evidence, one by one, and that after the Jury might withdraw, to consider what proper Questions to ask them, and after might come down again, which the Court granted. Then all the Witnesses were ordered to go out of the Court, and to be called in one by one.
This done
Will. Blith
[...]
Esq was produced, and a Paper delivered in. Mr.
Blithwayt gave account, that that Paper was put into his hands by Mr.
Gwin, Clerk of the Council, who had seized it amongst others in my Lord
Shaftesbury's house; and that he had took that, and others out of a Velvet Bagg, which Mr.
Gwin had lockt up in the great Trunk. Then Mr.
Gwin testified that he had the great Hair
[Page 136] Trunk in my Lord
Shaftesbury's house, when he was sent there to search for Papers, by Order of the Council the second of
July; my Lord, as soon as he came there, delivered him the Keys, and said, He would seal them up with his own Seal; but afterwards sent Mr.
Gwin word, if he pleased, he might put his own Seal; that he had taken a note how he had parted several parcels of Papers, that there were several sorts of them in the great Hair Trunk; and there was a Velvet Bag▪ into which he had put some Papers that were loose in my Lord's Closet above Stairs; that he had put his Seal upon the Trunk, and being sent another way, had put it into the Custody of Mr.
Blithwait. The Lord Chief Justice asked Mr.
Gwin whether all the Papers in the Velvet Bag were in my L.
Shaftesbury's Closet, and whether there was nothing in that Bag, but what he had taken in my Lord
Shaftesbury's
[Page 137] Closet? to which Mr.
Gwin replied, that there was nothing.
Mr. Secretary
Jenkins witnessed that that was the Paper he had of Mr.
Blithwayt. Some things I am forced for brevity to omit. My Lord Chief Justice said, Now it appears this was the Paper taken in my Lord
Shaftesbury's Closet. And the Paper was Read, which contained the words of that commonly called
The Form of an Association. When it had been Read, Sir
F
[...]n. Withins said, This Paper was very plausibly penn'd in the
[...], and runs a great way so; but in the last clause but one, there they come to perfect Levying of War; for they do positively say, They will obey such Officers, as either the Parliament, or the major part of them; or after the Parliament is Dissolved, the major part of them that shall subscribe this Paper shall appoint.
The Foreman of the Jury enquired, what Date that Paper was of
[Page 138] and whether there were any hand to it; to which Sir
Francis answered, that it was after the Bill for Exclusion of the Duke of
York; for it says, that way failing, they would do it by force; as to the having a name to it, Sir
Francis said, there was none at all. The rest of the Evidence were,
- John Booth,
- John Macknamara,
- Edward Turbervill,
- Dennis Macknamara,
- John Smith,
- Edward Joye,
- Bryan Haynes,
- Bernard Dennis.
Booth deposeth, That in
January last he was introduced into my Lord
Shaftesbury's acquaintance by Captain
Henry Wilkinson, in order to get a Commission, and Plantation in
Carolina; That the first time he went to my Lord, there was my
L. Craven, and Sir
Peter Colliton, who are of the Proprietors of that Collony; that after this acquaintance, he had been there between
Christmas and
March, four or five
[Page 139] times, and that he found great difficulty in his Accession to his Lordship, who was cautious of what company were admitted to him; that the said Earl used to inveigh sharply against the Times, and look upon himself as not so valued, nor respected, nor in those Places and Dignities as he expected, & seemed discontented. Particularly, that the Earl of
Shaftesbury should say, that the Parliament would never grant the King Money, nor satisfie him in those things that he desired, unless he first gave the People satisfaction in those things that they insisted on before; and particularly the Bill of Excluding the Duke of
York from the Crown. Another was the Abolishing the Statute of the 35th of
Elizabeth. The third was giving his Royal Assent for the passing a New Bill, whereby all the Dissenting Protestants should be freed from those Penalties and Ecclesiastical Punishments, that they are subject
[Page 140] to, by the present Establish'd Law. That he had Established fifty Gentlemen, persons of Quality, that he believed would have men along with them, that they were to come to
Oxford at such a time; that if there were any Violence offered to any of the Members by the King's Guards, or the Retinue of the Court, that then these men, with others that other Lords had appointed, should repel his force, by greater force, and should purge the Guards of all the Papists and Tories; that Captain
Wilkinson was Intrusted with the Command of these men; and that these men should be ready to Assist himself, and those of his Confederacy, to purge from the King those Evil Councillors that were about him: That particularly there were named, the Earl of
Worcester, Lord
Clarendon, Lord
Hallifax, Lord
Feversham, Lord
Hide, which persons were lookt upon to be dangerous, and gave the King
[Page 141] Evil Advice: That those Lords should by Violence be taken from the King, and the King brought to
London, where those things should be Establisht which they designed for their Safety in those two Respects, for the preserving the Protestant Religion, and likewise for the defending and keeping us safe from Arbitrary Power and Government: And likewise, that the said
Booth had provided Arms, and a good Stone-Horse for himself, and Arms for his Man, before the Parliament Sate at
Oxford. That the
Thursday before the Parliament was Dissolved, Captain
Wilkinson told him, he expected that very week to be called up to
Oxford, with those men that were Listed with him; but
Saturday bringing News of the Dissolution of the Parliament, it had no further Effects. This was the most material of what
Booth said; for being straitned in Room, I am forced to render it as short as I can.
[Page 142]
Turbervil declared, That about the beginning of
February, waiting on my Lord
Shaftesbury, to have his advice how he might come by some Monies and to gain his Lordships Letter in his behalf to the President of the Council; the Earl should say, there was little good to be expected from the King as long as his Guards were about him; that his Lordship should say the Rabble about
Wapping, and
Aldersgate were of that side; that the rich men of the City would vote for Elections, but it could hardly be expected they should stand by them in case of a disturbance; for they valued their Riches more than their Cause; and that at
Oxford he had heard the Earl say, he wondred the People of
England should stickle so about Religion, if he were to chuse a Religion, he would have one should comply with what was apt to carry on their Cause.
Smith said, that one time being
[Page 143] sent for by my Lord
Shaftesbury, by one Captain
Manly, his Lordship should tell him, that Mr.
Hetherington had told him, he was afraid the Irish Witnesses would go over to the Court Party, and retract what they had said formerly, that he advised him to persuade them not to go near that Rogue
Fitz-Girald, that great Villain, that is pampered up and maintain'd by the King and the Court party, to stifle the Plot in
Ireland, and that the Earl had further said, That if the King were not as well satisfied with the coming in of Popery, as ever the Duke of
York was, do you think the Duke of
York would be so much concerned for the bringing in of Popery as he is? That a little before my Lord went to
Oxford, he should tell the said
Smith, there were great preparations made, and a great many gathered together upon the Rode be tween
London and
Oxford, and
Smith asking his Lordship what it might
[Page 144] mean, my Lord should answer, that it was only to terrifie the Parliament to comply with the Kings desire, which he was sure the Parliament would never do: That they were now more resolute than ever: That they clearly saw the Kings aim was to bring in Popery: That they had the Nation for them, and might lawfully oppose him, and he would meet with very strong opposition; for that all that came out of the Country should be well Hors'd, and armed, and so they should all be: That the City had resolved to bear the charge of their Members, and send so many men to wait on them; and that he would be hang'd before he would ever bring in Popery, or any thing of that nature.
Bryan Hains deposed, that among other Discourse with the L.
Shaftesbury, the said Earl told him, that the Duke of
Bucks's Mother was descended of the Family of the
Plant aginets, naming some of the
Edwards,
[Page 145] and that in her Right he should have the Barony of
Ross, and in her Right had as good a Title to the Crown of
England as ever any
Stewart had.
John Macknamara deposed, That a little after the Parliament had been dissolved at
Oxford, the Earl of
Shaftesbury said to him, That the King was Popishly affected, that he took the same methods that his Father before him took, which brought his Head to the block, and said,
We will also bring his thither; and that the Earl had said the King deserved to be deposed as much as ever King
Richard the second did.
Denis M
[...]cnamara declared, that my Lord
Shaftesbury had said, The King was a man that ought not to be believed, and that
[...]e ought to be deposed as well as
Richard the second, that the Dutchess o
[...]
Mazarine was one of his Cabinet Council, that he did nothing but by her, Advice.
Edward Ivey said, that the Earl
[Page 146] of
Shafton soon after the Parliament was dissolved at
Oxford, speaking against the King, said he was an unjust man, and unfit to reign, that he was a Papist in his heart, and would introduce Popery: That another time he heard him exclaim against the King, and that they designed to depose him, and set another in his stead.
Bernard Dennis deposed, that amongst divers other things the Lord
Shaftesbury had told him, that they intended to have
England under a Common-Wealth, and no Crown, to have no supream head, particular Man, or King, nor owe Obedience to a Crown.
Lord Chief Justice told the Jury, they intended to call no more Witnesses against the Earl of
Shaftesbury, the Jury being charged only with that.
Mr.
Papillion desired to know what S
[...]atute the Indictment was grounded upon; my Lord Chief Justice said it
[Page 147] was
contra formam Statut', which might be understood
Statutorum, or
Statuti, so they might go upon all Statutes that might be the form o that Indictment. The Jury desired to know whether any of the Witnesses stood indicted or no. To which the Lord Chief Justice answered, they were not properly here to examine the credibility of the Witnesses; for that would be a matter upon a Tryal before a Petty Jury, where the King would be heard to defend the credibility of his Witnesses, if any thing were objected against them: That they were to see whether the Statute were satisfied, in having matter that was Treasonable, and witnessed by Two Men, who are intended
Prima facie credible, unless of their own Knowledg they knew any thing to the contrary.
Mr.
Papillion prayed his Lordships Opinion, whether his Lordship thought they were within the
[Page 148] compass of their own Understandings and Consciences, to give Judgment; for if they were not left to consider the credibility of the Witnesses, they could not satisfie their Consciences. To which the Lord Chief Justice replied, that they ought to go according to the Evidence, unless there were any thing to their own knowledg, and that i
[...] they expected to enter into proofs concerning the credit of the Witnesses, it were impossible to do Justice at that rate. The Jury withdrew, and the Court adjourned till Three a Clock. When met the Jury put many questions to the Witnesses, of which (for brevity) I can but take notice of some.
Mr.
Gwin was asked by the Foreman, whose writing the Paper was, to which he answered he could not tell: whether it was in the Closet before he came there; he said it was certainly in the closet, for there he found it, he knew not the particular
[Page 149] Paper, but all the Papers in the bag were there.
They asked whether he knew not of a Discourse of an Association in Parliament. He said he was not of the last Parliament, but had heard an Association talked of. Then the Foreman asked Mr. Secretary
Jenkins whether he knew not of a Debate in Parliament concerning an Association, whether he remembred not that it was read upon occasion of the Bill: The Secretary answered, that he was not present at the Debate; that there was an answer to a Message from the House of Commons, had somthing in it which did strongly imply somthing of an Association; that he heard such a thing spoke of, but was not present at the Reading. Being asked the date of the Warrant for my Lord
Shaftesbury's commitment, he must (he said) refer himself to the Warrant; that he thought it was about the beginning of
July. Being asked whether
[Page 150] all the Witnesses had been examined before the Committee, he answered, they were, and he was present at the Examination. Being asked again whether all, he said he knew not whether all; but he was sure he was at the Examination of several, but could not tell how many.
Then the Jury examined the rest of the Witnesses, one by one,
Booth being asked whether he had easie admittance into my Lords company, said, he ever went with Capt.
Wilkinson, and had easie admittance; whether Captain
Wilkinson were with him every time, he said, no, not every time, not this time; to divers other questions he answered; That he had been in Orders; that he had not been indicted for Fellony; that he did not directly know any one man of the Fifty beside himself; that he never was with my Lord but at his own House; that he was never desired to be a Witness against my Lord, until
[Page 151] he had intimated something of it, till he was told of
Brownrigg the
Yorkshire Attorney, concerning somwhat my Lord had said to
Irish men, he then said he was sure there was somthing as to that purpose to
English men; that he thought he had no Commission to offer him a Reward; that he was not acquainted with
Callaghan, nor
Downing; never heard their names, nor was in their company, that he knew of; that he knew not one Mr.
Shelden, nor Mr.
Marriot, only had heard of one
Marriot that belong'd to the D. of
Norfolk, but never was in his company, nor discoursed with from him, but had heard from
Baines, about
Brownrigg, about
Irish Witnesses. Mr.
Godfrey asked whether he had never heard of
Irish Witnesses sent down by Mr.
Marriot to the Isle of
Ely: Then the L. Ch. Just. said, We have given you all the Liberty in the World, hoping you would ask pertinent questions, but these are
[Page 152] trifles; he did not expect that any wise men would have asked such questions: Then he asked of Mr.
Godfrey what it was to the purpose, whether Mr.
Marriot sent any
Irish Witnesses to his Tennant, or no. To which the Foreman told his Lordship, that he had it under the hand of the Clerk of the Council. Mr.
Turbervil answered to several questions, that he had the Discourse with my Ld.
Shaftesbury about the beginning of
February, and about
July 4. communicated it to Mr. Secretary
Jenkins. The Foreman then asking whether he had met with no body about the beginning of
July, after my Lords Commitment, and when he was challenged, and told he was to be a Witness against him, whether he did not then say, as he was alive he knew no such thing?
Mr. Attor. Gen. told my Lord, this was not to be allowed, this was private Instruction, which the Ju
[...] was not to take. The Foreman replied,
[Page 153] no, it was no private Instruction, but asked
Turbervill, whether he had not spoke such words to Mr.
Herbert. Then the L. C. J. asked whether they had any Information touching that to Mr.
Herbert; the Foreman said, he had, a long time ago, that the person told him so, set down the day, and was very angry with
Turbervill for it. The L. C. J. told them, that discourses taken up at random, at Coffee-houses, were not fit to be brought in, when Treason was in question against the King's Life; that it was not ground to cavil at persons, because they heard such discourse at a Coffee-house.
The Foreman said, he never was in a Coffeehouse with Mr.
Herbert in his life, but had the discourse of him some months ago. The L. C. J. asked whether they thought that groundenough against the Witness; Mr.
Papillion replied, they only asked the question, whether he had not contradicted, or said the contrary to any body.
Turbervill said, he did not remember he had said any thing to Mr.
Herbert in his life, and that at that time he was discarded by all persons of my Lord's Interest; and if he would then have given under his hand, that he knew nothing against him, he believed he might have been in their favour as before. He was asked, whether he was not one of them that petitioned the Common Council, and declared that he was tempted to witness against his Conscience;
Turbervill said he did, but that he believed he
[Page 154] never read the Petition, but was drawn to it by the order of Mr.
Colledge, by a Scriviner about
Guild-Hall. That his design in it was, that the City should take care of him; that he was not very poor, nor over full of money; some Members of the House of Commons had told them, that the City should advance money for the support of the Witnesses, and that they were to Petition that they would answer the design of the Parliament; being asked what Members they were, he said, it was a Member of the House of Commons that told him so; he would assure them, he said what he spoke, was voluntarily, & that he knew nothing more than what he had here declared; he supposed his Deposition was given in after the Commitment of my L.
Shaftesbu.
Smith being asked, whether he had not used to go by the name of
Barry, said, he had gone by several names, as all Popish Priests do; he said, he had given in his Information to Secretary
Jenkins; he thought a little after my L. was committed; but had given notice long before of what he intended to do to other persons. But the Questions put to him being not very material, and his Answers of little moment, for want of room, must be waved; and we come to
Bryan Haines, who in answer to divers Questions put to him by the Jury, said, That he gave in his Information against my L.
Shaftesbury, the day that he the said
Bryan was taken by a Messenger; that he had before given in
[Page 155] another account to Sir
G. Treby, of a design against the L.
Shaftesbury, about
March last, which was, That
Fitz-Girald had told him, that he had given it under his Hand to the King, that the E. of
Shaftesbury did resolve to set the Crown on his own Head, or turn the Kingdom to a Common-wealth; that he had discourse with my Ld. at several times, sometimes at his own House, somtimes in
Ironmonger-Lane; that there
Hains had proposed a Rebellion in
Ireland; that the Earl said that was not the best way, they had other means to take, and so the Discourse was waved; being asked whether ever he had bin a Witness for, or against the Lady
Windham, he said she arested him, because he had said he lay with her.
John Macknamara answered to several questions put to him, that he had discourse with the Lord
Shaftesbury in
March and
April; that he could not tell exactly when he gave in his Information, but that it was to Secretary
Jenkins; that
Ivey was by when they had the discourse; That he signed the Petition to the Common Council, but did not see it till 'twas brought him to sign; that he did not read it, nor knew the Contents of it. Then Mr.
Papillion told the Court, that in that Petition they say, they were tempted to swear against their Consciences, and that some of the Witnesses had made Shipwrack of their Consciences; but if we should ask them who tempted them, and
[Page 156] who those Witnesses were that made shipwrack of their Consciences, it would signifie nothing; for since they do not know what was in the Petition, it is in vain to ask them any more.
J. Macknamara said, he heard Mr.
Colledg that was executed at
Oxford, was concerned in promoting the Petition by my L.
Shaftsburys Advice.
The Answer of
Dennis Macknamara to divers questions put by the Jury, was to this purpose, That he was introduced to my Lord by his Brother, in
March or
April last, he knows not which; that none but
Ivey was by; that he gave in his Information to the Secretary of State, long before the Earl was committed. Then Mr.
Papillion proposed to the Court, whether they might not ask, if he had a Pardon, for it would be satisfaction to them. Ld. Ch. Just.
North answered, it might be proper when the Prisoner made Exceptions to the Witnesses, but that there were no Exceptions to the Witnesses. Mr.
Papillion said they made no exceptions, but they must satisfie their Consciences, and that was very much as they found the credibility of the Witnesses.
My L. Ch. J.
North asked what he should have a Pardon for: Mr.
Papillion answered for Crimes: My L. C. J.
North said, They must not ask him to accuse himself. Mr.
Papillion said, if he had a pardon he was in
Statu quo; suppose my Ld. some of them have been guilty of Poisoning, some of Felony, some of Robbing
[Page 157] on the High way; they did but ask them if they were pardoned. L. C. J.
North answered, a Man must not be impeached, but where he may answer for it. Mr.
Papillion said, My Lord, if you do not give leave we must for bear then. L. C. J.
N. said he did not think it proper.
Edward Ivey gave in answer to several questions demanded of him, That the discourse he had with my Lord, was some time after the sitting of the Parliament at
Oxford, about the latter end of
March, or beginning of
April, that he could not be positive when he made his Information, but it was given to the Secretary of State; that he thinks the two
Macknamara's were by & no body else; he is sure one of them was: That he gave his Information as soon as he could; that he knew nothing more than he had deposed.
To Questions asked of
Bernard Dennis, he answered to this purpose; That he had this discourse in
April, 4 or 5 days after the Parliament was dissolved at
Oxford, In
March after the Parliament was dissolved at
Oxford, that it was at his own House, that Mr.
Shepheard, a Gentleman of my Lords, was there, and some of his Pages; but he could not tell whether they heard any thing; that my Lord did not whisper, that he made this Information in
June, before my Lord was committed; that he gave it to Secretary
Jenkins; that he concealed it so long, because he continued so long in the
[Page 158] City; That he had been a Protestant since
February: that he had the Discourse with my Ld. in his own Chamber, the great Chamber, he knew not whether it was called the Hall, or the Parlor; that he knew nothing more but what he had declared; that he could not tell whether all his kindred were Papists, but most were.
Then the Jury took up the Statute Book; and in short time came down, and returned the Bill
Ignoramus. At which the People gave a great shout; the Attorney General desired it might be recorded, this hollowing and hooping in a Court of Justice.
The Witnesses had several times declared they were in danger to be stoned by the People, upon which the Sheriffs guarded them with a strong guard as far as
Temple-Bar.
Nov. 28. 1681. His Lordship the E. of
Shaftesbury was brought up from the
Tower, to the Bar of the
King's-Bench, upon
Habeas Corpus, and several persons of Honour offering themselves for Bail, his Lordship prayed the Court, that some friends and relations of his own might be accepted; which was accordingly granted. The same time Mr.
Wilson, a Gentleman belonging to the E. of
Shaftesbury, (who had been committed to the
Gate-house for Treason, during his Lordships Confinement in the
Tower) was discharged upon Bail. And a Proclamation was Issued out for preventing of Bonfires, it not being thought fit that people should be encouraged in their triumphs on that occasion; tho many considerable Towns and Cities in the Country, upon the news of the discharge of his Lordship, and the Lord
Howard, proclaimed their Congratulations
[Page 159] by Bells and Bonfires. During the time of the Earl of
Shaftesburies Confinement, many made it their buisiness to detract, and vilipend him, 'twas the mode among some to drink his Health, with a
Pendulum, at a Hempen string, to call him
Ton
[...], Tapskin, and King of
Poland, &c. a man could hardly be admitted to drink a glass of Wine, without casting some of it in his face. After this great Tryal, the Right Honourable the Earl of
Shaftsbury (as it's said) arrested one
Baines, one of the Witnesses against him, on a Writ of Conspiracy, and had likewise
Booth, (a Prisoner in the
Kings-Bench) with a Writ of the same nature, intending to do the like with other the Aspersours of his Honour, and Loyalty. One Mr.
Graham of
Staples Inn, and Mr.
Craddock, of
PaterNoster-Row, were Arrested, about
Decemb. on an Action of
Scandalum Magnatum, at the Suit of the said Earl.
Monday, Feb. 14. 1681. My L.
Shaftesbury, my L.
Howard appearing in
Westm. Hall, it being the last day of the Term, and there being nothing to be charged against them, they were discharged, together with Mr.
Wilmore, and Mr.
Whitaker.
May 4. 1682. being the first of the Term, a motion was made by the Council for Mr.
Craddock, who (we said) had been Arrested by the Right Honourable the E. of
Shaftesbury, and a Declaration was delivered, that the E. intended to come to Tryal that Term. Mr.
Craddock's Council moved, that the great Intimacy betwixt his Lordship, and the Sheriffs, and Inhabitants of
London, might influence the Jury; and therefore prayed the Court that the Trial thereof might be orderdered in another County. The Court ordered
Friday following for his Lordship to shew cause why it might not be Tryed by an Indifferent Jury of another County. On the
Friday his Lordship himself appeared in Court, and declared he would
[Page 160] not oppose the making the Rule absolute; for he desir'd it should be Tryed by an Indifferent Jury, only desired to have it Tryed that Term: The Defendant's Council still pressed the changing of the
Venire, that it might arise out of some other County, and that they could have such Affidavits as would induce the Court thereunto. The Court ordered the
Monday following to file the Affidavits, that my Lord's Council might have notice.
May 12. The Council for Mr.
Graham made a motion in Court to the same purport, as Mr.
Craddock's Council had done. After which his Lordship declared, That if he could not have the Liberty of a Subject, to lay his Action in what County he pleased, he would remit it until such time as he had further considered it. Thus have we faithfully given you an Account of the most Remarkable Occurrences relating to this great Peer unto this time: Afterwards he lived at his own house in
[...]ldersgate-street, and continued there until the beginning of this present
Novemb. when it is said, he Embarqued for the
Brill, and hath since his Arrival received great Testimonies of an Honour and Respect suitable to the Character of so great and known a States-man, whose Fame is not only celebrated in the Court of
Holland, but amongst all the States-men in
Europe.
FINIS.