MEMORIALS OF WORTHY PERSONS. The Third Decad. By C L. BARKSDALE.

Quos Corpore non valemus, recordatione teneamus. Hieron.

OXFORD, Printed by A. & L. Liechfield, Printers to the Vniversity, for the Editor. 1662.

Nobilissimo Adolescenti, D. EDVARDO HYDE, Ex Aede Ch. Illustrissimi Viri EDVARDI Comitis de CLARENDON, Regni ANGLIAE & Acad. OXONIENSIS CANCELLARII Honoratissimi, Filio non degeneri: C. B. Ejusdem Cancellarii benignitate Rector de Naunton in Agro Gloc. Libellum suum, Animi non immemoris indicem, Humillime D. D.

Magni propago Seminis, Collegii
Henriciani, Matris ac almae decus,
A Matre posse; sumere exemplum Tibi,
Nisi esset instar omnium Clarus Pater.
Haec nostra non erunt inutilia tamen:
Sunt ista fortiora quae plures docent.

To the Ingenuous Readers.

GENTLEMEN,

THe Persons here presented, are worthy, certainly, of an honourable Re­membrance: the particulars col­lected are such as, to me, seemed most re­markable. More you may find, if you desire, in the Authours to whom I refer you: For I would be taken only for a faithful Colle­ctor. The benefit to be received hence (which I do principally aim at) is, that you may worthily esteem of our Church, adorned with such excellent examples; and that, by your imitation of these, your selves may deserve to be, hereafter, added to the Cata­logue.

Your affectionate Servant, C. B.

The Persons.

  • 1. K. Edward 6.
  • 2. La. Jane Grey.
  • 3. Sir John Cheek.
  • 4. Arch B. Whitgift.
  • 5. Mr. Rich. Hooker.
  • 6. Bishop Andrews.
  • 7. Bishop Brounrig.
  • 8. Mr. Tho. Gataker.
  • 9. Dr. H. Hammond.
  • 10. Bishop Smith.

Ad Librum.

Ʋade, Liber, pede felici: Lectoribus esto
Delicium, tantis auree Nominibus.

MEMORIALS.

FINIS.

A Letter.
To fill up this void leaf, or rather to promote con­formity, which is partly the designe of these Me­morials, I take leave to translate hither out of the Oxford-book, very worthy to be Reprinted, A Letter of the Vice-Chancellour and others the Heads of the Ʋniversity of Cambridge, to the Vice-Chancellour and others of the Ʋniuersity of Oxford, Octob. 7. 1603.
E Latino.

WHen newly, and indeed very late, there came unto us a report of the Petition for Reformation (forsooth) of the Church of England, offered to his Majestie (as is pretended) by a thou­sand Ministers: though we found in it nothing new, and what hath been answered heretofore a thousand times; Yet, because they boast of their number, that these Millenaries may know, if Saul hath his thousand, David in this cause will never want his ten thousand, we were desirous (not­withstanding the work was altogether unworthy of it) to provide an answer. Whilst we were me­ditating thereof; there is brought unto our hands, that most Elegant answer of the Ʋniuersi­ty of Oxford, being a most rational and brief con­futation of all that had by those men so labori­ously been framed and feigned: upon sight where­of, nothing seemed to remain for us (whom in this best of causes, the zeal and industry of our Brethren [Page 103] easily able to refute such Adversaries, had prevented) but this, to add unto the weight of their Arguments (because those men glory most in their multitudes) the number of our Suffrages. This we did formerly (as it were divining) both foresee and provide for. For when, after the death of our Excellent Queen Elizabeth, alwaies the same and most constant (a singular and incomparable example in a woman) in this best of causes, those men did not so much deplore the loss of a most Religious Princess, and the case of Religion it self (if not dying with her, yet at least in very great hazard) as meditate, and every day attempt Innovations against the new Kings approach: Our Ʋniversity very opportunely judged her aid to be needful, and a decree to be made in a full and so­lemn Convocation: That, whosoever shall in the Ʋniversity of Cambridge publickly oppose, in word or writing or any other way, the Doctrine or Discipline of the Church of England, or any part thereof, by Law established; He shall be excluded from taking any degree, and be suspended ipso facto from the de­gree he hath taken. Which decree, even by Una­nimous consent of the whole House, voted and re­corded publickly, Jun. 9. 1603. we do now de­sire to publish to the whole World, that all may be assured, what is the judgment, not of some Opi­niasters in their corners and Conventicles, but of allmost all the Cantabrigians in open senate, [Page 104] concerning that Discipline which we have not forced on us, but freely received and entertained. Whose consent so fraternally and sweetly concur­ring with the Oxford-answer, with Scripture, Fa­thers and Councils, with the decrees of our Princes, our Laws and Parliaments; Away with those thousand Ministers, let them go and answer at thousand Books of ours, already written and set forth for their satisfaction, before they do so im­pudently obtrude their Crambe so often boiled, up­on so wise a King, and so excellently learned. Or if they would have Suffrages rather to be numbred then weighed, let the poor Fellows, forsaken of the Universities and Muses, bethink themselves, of how little account, what nothings they are.

Thus we take our leave of our most dear Bre­thren in Christ; and, as we and our Vniversity, be­ing united to you, both by similitude of studies and manners, are most firmly Yours; So we in­treat you, alwaies to continue your love to Us.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.