COTTA CONTRA ANTONIVM OR AN ANT-ANTONY: OR AN ANT-APOLOGY, manifesting Doctor Antony his Apo­logie for Aurum potabile, in true and e­quall ballance of right Reason, to be false and counterfait.

By IOHN COTTA Doctor in Physicke.

AT OXFORD, Printed by IOHN LICHFIELD & IAMES SHORT for HENRY CRIPPS. Anno Dom. 1623.

THe Author doth advertise the Reader, that except he first read, and diligently consider both the prefixed Epistles, before he enter vpon the Worke, he cannot escape mistaking, both in many particulars, and in his maine scope.

TO THE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL Eminent, Learned, and Reuerend Do­ctors in Physicke resident in the Renow­ned Vniuersitie of Oxford.

Most Honoured Gentlemen,

IT is a faithfull and true saying of that peerelesse Physition, and Philosopher Galen. lib. 8. de compos. Med. secund. Loc. sect. 4. Impossibile est invenire pharma­cum ad plures affectiones optimum. Invenitur enim in vnaqua (que) ip­sarum id quod propriè ipsis destinatum est praestantius esse. It is impossible to finde one, and the selfesame medicine equally the most excelling for many or di­verse deseases. For it is by experience discovered, that that medicine which is properly and peculiarly desti­ned vnto every disease, is the most fit, proper, and ab­solute for it. The same Author in another place aver­reth, Medicina sexties aut septies probata non facit vni­versalem propositionem. One medicine or kind of me­dication though oft approued, doth not notwith­standing make good or assured any vniversall or ge­nerall [Page] proposition or promise of his effect to be at all times the same. D r Anthony his ignorance hereof in his Apologie is palpable, who because hee may hap­ly haue imagined his golden medicine effectuall or succesfull in some kinds of maladies; he doth thence inferr an vniversall rash pronunciate thereof, that it is an vniversall medicine and most excelling in all ca­ses. Th s is the vsuall deceaved rauoci [...]ation of an Empiricke, trusting his owne partiall obseruation not calling vnto counsell therewith the auncient tried rul [...]s of reason, knowledge, and iudgement, Non possibile est [...]t ali [...]s rei facult [...]tes ex [...]erientia c [...]m­modè explores, si non p i [...]s exa [...]te compertum habu [...]ris affectum cui adb betur id quod exploratur, siue id potus si [...]e cib [...]s, siue p [...]ar­macum si [...]. Ga [...]end. 1. de A­l [...]n facultat [...]. from all preceding learned times vnto men industrious, studious, and ingenuous, derived. This knowledge bringeth assurance from evidence of reason: observa­tion or particular experience alone without knowe­ledge bringeth vncertaine collection only or wave­ring guessing; since to make pronunciates certaine or assured by one mans observations alone, requireth not only many dayes, M gnum de­cus e [...]t & orna­mentum ex eri­e [...] ia o [...]nal [...]s, se [...] experientia doctrine at (que) rationi co [...]iuncta. E [...] verò quae si­ne arte & d [...] ­ctrina est, cum Hippocrate [...] & p [...]r [...]ici­osu [...] statuo. Crat [...] epist. med [...]d Henric. Herwart. patricium Augustanum. but yeares and ages. Vnto this effect sayth Galen in pro [...]rhet. 1. sect. 15. Qui speculatio­nem medicinalem empir [...]cè congerit, is non centum sed mille annis opus habet. Hee that propoundeth vnto himselfe to compile an art of Physike, from his owne observation or experience alone, hath need of the allowance not of an hundred, but of a thousand yeares. And herein is evidently seene the plaine dif­ference betweene the learned Physitian and the Em­piricke. The learned Physitian by studious contempla­tion and assiduous and select reading maketh prompt and diligent vse of all learned writers and authors, who as glorious lamps or lights thorow all ages [Page] haue brightly shone in t [...]ere guidance and direction vnto all succeeding times, and thereby enioyeth not only their time honoured knowledge, but the rich experience of all foregoing learned generations. The Empir [...]ck contrariwise trusteth cheifely his owne witt and private observation, and therewith serveth other mens necessities, with care of his owne gayne, but without conscience or sense of their inevitable deadly For this cause, [...]a [...]h Hi­pocra [...]s, Api [...]. [...]. l. 1. [...]. Emp [...] ­rica peric [...]tatio perniciosa. wounds, by his as vnavoydable defects in want of knowledge. The reason why men generally are so insensible hereof, and of their owne secrett and hidden insnaring of their health and life thereby, is for that ever among all sorts and kinds of men, the fewest possesse the truest iudging. For this cause saith Galen de praenot. Si contingat vt apud pueros & impru­dentes Medicus & Coquus ferat iudicium, Coquus non paulò plus suffragiorumferet. If among children or common iudging men, any meane affected Cooke should contend for prioritie by most voyces with the learned Physitian, their Childish sillie iudging would in suffrages haply preferre by many degrees the iollie Cooke. By this vsuall errour (to the perdi­tion Perd [...]re quo [...] vul Iup [...]ter hos dementat. Se [...]ec. of those whome God hath blinded) oftimes do diverse sorts of men defectiuely or deprauedly learned, our ordinary Omnipotent Promisers, Vni­versall vndertakers, wittie Proiectours, loude and endles Historians of their owne praise, and other learned bubles, halfe lettered Huiu [...]mo [...]iho­munc [...]o [...]es semi­dogma [...]ieo [...]e­micto [...]os appel­lat Galen. lib. de Meth. Med. and lowly learned Practisers, prodigiously clime vnto a wondred and vndeserued height of popular fame and common e­steeme. Divers kinds also of improvident idiotes, not [Page] secured by any safe conduct of likelihood or reason in their actions, nor provided by any forethought so much as in sense or reason to prevent the vsually daungerous sequele of their rash attempts, and blind­ly only led by witlesse confidence in a causelesse hope of vndeserued good hap (as being merely ignorants senslesly welmeaning) do notwithstanding oft times grow largly noysed and (vnto the wonderment and amazement of reason) fame spread. Oftimes also e­ven luglers, Fortune tellers, Figure casters, and Witches doe exceed all these kinds in spaciousnes of vulgar worship and largenesse of renowne. Thus blind, partial, & false, Contemne fa­mam, fama vix vero fauet. Sen. Trag. 4. Tam fi­cti praui (que) te­nax quàm nun­tia veri. Virg. Aeneid. 4. is fame, a factor for cousnage, a baud to deceit, the misgouerned brute, the impure aire & breath of the vnlearned, rash, & inconsiderate multitude, and therefore by generous worthy minds disdainfully valewed as vncertaine, giddie, vagabond. The iudicious report and true testimony of good men, solidly learned, vprightly iudging, and truely vn­derstanding, is that true fame and glorie which the wiseman Viri boni ha­bere possunt glo­riam, id est bono­rum testimoni­um suorum ope­rum comitem, & bic in terris eo velut melle tem­perare id quoq in virtute est ama­rum. At vulgi famam & au­ram quis sapiens [...]aptat? Lips. Ep. [...] Ital. & Hisp. doth alone esteeme, which only gene­rously and vertuously can be affected, and whereof solely vertue can be ambitious, wherevnto wisdome solely doth listen and iudgment giue eare; Whether then D r Antony do by partiall and false fame vsurpe only, or among learned men by true worth in right possesse, that exalted high name which in his Apo­logy he doth vaunt & chalenge; I do by this my Anta­pologie present and offer vnto your truely iudicious, equall, and impartiall doome. I do in this cause ra­ther appeale vnto your censure, then vnto my deare [Page] & honoured mothers sonnes, my reuerend brothers of that coexcelling, famous, and beauteous sister vni­versitie of Cambridge: first for that the wrong im­posed by D r Antony is common vnto some of your selues together with me: secondly for that some of you are witnestes of the vniustnesse of the imputa­tion cast vpon me by D r Antony in his Apologie. As you are in your selues, so in a publique cause ex­presse your selues, the noble true heires of the thrice excellent, auncient, and incomparable Prince and fa­ther of learning Hippocrates, in generositie and li­bertie of spirit, in loue of truth, and of your owne free ingenuous and honourable profession. The rea­son why in this common prouocation I alone doe deigne to vndertake D r Antony his iust castigation, by other learned men despised and held in deserued scorne, is for that the ridiculous, insulting, and vn­checked insolence of some of his abettors more neer vnto me, hath more frequently presented it selfe vnto my view, and thereby hath galled me out of the same resolued contempt of opposing his senselesse and tri­fling pamphlet. Since then I am thus compelled in­to these lists, vouchsafe your iust eyes to behold me with prosperous vows, wherein as I can not feare, so shall I not be proud of the victory.

An vnfained louer and true homage [...] bearer vnto the auncient and most infallible Hippocratical learning IOHN COTTA.

Errata sic corrigenda.

Page 1. line 2. at D r An dele the? p. 3. in the marg. note * Forma in the 3 line read sunt unum. p. 4. l. 17. for Synodius read Synochus, and in the same line for Augnia read Augina. p. 9. l. 15. dele the Latin sentence which should stand in the margent, and read, diuell, man, and imposture. p. 21. l. 21. for I hang in so equall ballance, read I hang you in so equall ballance. p. 31. l. 16. for Areanum read Arcanum. p. 33. l. 31. for thee read the. p. 35. l. 27. for is the read in the. p. 46 l. 27. in the mar. for fervore read fervorē. p. 48. l. 26. for Sayton read Gayton. p. 55 l. 15. for Attaliu [...] read Attalus. p. 32. l. 19 for Dissimulas qui sis, dum nolis quem scis haberi, reade Dissimulas qui sis, dum quem scis prodere nolis.

TO THE READER.

THis Antapologie (worthy Reader) was addressed vnto the Presse Anno 1616 as may be testified by letters then da­ted from some worthie and eminent Doctors of London, concerning the same, vpon a view thereof to them pre­sented. It was committed or offred vn­to the presse, and a while pawsed in the hands of the Printer of the Ʋniversitie of Oxford, as will ap­peare by letters likewise from some illustrious and learned Do­ctors of the same famous Vniuersitie. It was thence againe re­called home, and hath now by my selfe beene diuers yeares silen­ced vpon solicitation of some worthie Gentlemen my frends, who in the behalfe of D. Anthony, promised a faire and equall satis­faction from him. My indulgence vnto them hath hetherto been deluded. I doe therefore now iudge it full time no longer to tole­rate, that so scandalous an imputation, as the Apologie doth impose vpon me falsely, should still in publike braue so impudent­ly without as open and publike rebuke. And for this cause I haue now at last set at large this Antapologie, thus long iniuriously restrained. Vnderstand then that by the three first domesticall Testimonies, or emissarie letters of the Apologie, D r Co. (so cur­tally stiled by the Apologist) is charged with an vnexpected A­larum. The challenge is that Aurum potabile solely and wholy recouered the Gentleman in them mentioned, not onely without any worth or vse in D r Co. his endeauour, but rather with error and wrong thereby. The contrary hereto shall in due time and place be maintained by a discharge of D r Co. his iust defense as [Page] well appointed as the enemies brauing charge, and onset in their rash and vnaduisedly giuen offense. It may be obi [...]cted, how can the privat quarrell against the three first Testimonies, inferre offence taken against the Apologist? The answere is, be [...]ause his Apologie can admit no Apologie for his vndiscreet publishing other mens private spleenes vnto D r C. his p [...]eiudice, and for bringing his name vpon the stage, and there acting that part which befitteth no honest or sober man, in a cause and person vn­knowne. D r C. neuer infringed his Aurum, nor wronged him­selfe, notwithstanding in vaine and phantasticall dreame of a triumph, and for the idolizing of his Aurum potabile, Doctor Antony, or rather Doctor An (if I may without solecisme ab­breviate him, as he in the same kinde hath first p [...]esumed with me) D r An (I say) iniuriously maketh himselfe the false trump of Doctor Co. his reproach, insinuated in the three first dome­sticall Testimonies. They are subscribed by two Gentlemen, and a Minister (so rightly rather tearmed for ministring the occasion of such scandall, then for any eminence or noted worth in his owne function.) The Gentlemen D r Co. will not so mainly op­pose, perswading himselfe, that they are only transported by o­thers malitious instigation. His maine scope shall be at those two materially opposing markes. Marke-Antony, & Antony-Marke, in this their simple conversion, not doubting to retribute a dou­ble attenuation of their boasting follies. Antony, since in the golden flagge of the vaine-glorious praise of his Aurum pota­bile, he doth beare in triumph D r C. his iniured name before the victory, hee therefore will first arme himselfe to strike at the plume of his pride, his counterfait colours, his armour of best proofe, by the generall demolition of his whole Apologie. As for Marke, since hee doth only ioyne his subsidiarie helpe by an in­cendiarie Epistle, he will only by the way buckle with him, as they shall meete in the batterie of the proofes of the fore-mentioned Testimonies. The challengers haue disgorged themselues in two Languages, for their greater boast. The Defendant will begin with the mother tongue, most fit for the satisfaction of his [Page] Countrey-men. He will heereafter giue demonstration, that hee hath learned to speake as like an ancient The Latine Antapologie hath diverse yeares since beene seene & vewed by some learned Docto [...]s of Oxford, London, and o­ther parts. Romane; as either Antony in his Apologie or Marke in his Epistolicall busie med­ling out of his Apostolicall charge. In the interim (friendly Rea­der) that thou mistake not, knowe that this Antapologie hath singled out D. Antony his Latine Apologie, as supposing it the more authenticke. The matter or substance being the same with the English, obscureth nothing thy vnderstanding thereof, though in some few things they are differing. To ease & refresh thy paines in the perusing of the more serious matters, I haue here and there cast and scattered in thy way, some witty and ele­gant sayings of some Latine Poets, and that I might exclude no mans reading, haue englished them vnto a vulgar capacitie. Con­cerning the matter it selfe, deliberately view and read, embrace the truth for it selfe and for none other end. Be not preiudicate, but free and true vnto thy owne heart, and iudge sincerely be­tweene truth and the lying visor, and impudent face of seeming truth.

Maxima pars vatum pater & iuuenes patre digni,
Decipimur specie recti, saith Horace.
Or old or young more or lesse wise,
Shadowes for truths, oft gull our eyes.

If any man deeme me ouerbold or overbitter with the Apologist let him read and ponder duly the vnciuill and rude prouocations of all honest and learned mindes, in his vilifying of all true lear­ning, comparatiuely, or compared with his owne, as also of all wholsome medicines of all other Artists, not yeelding vnto his the sole supremacy. The summe or epitome thereof let any man view in his Preface in the beginning, and in his Appendix in the end of his Engl [...]sh Apologie. If that prowd flesh require not a corrosiue, let equall and iust men iudge; If the app [...]ication be ne­cessary, pardon the medicinall hand; Distinguish (gentle Reader) I hate railing or scurrilitie, which with the Apologist in his A­pologie hath beene frequent and common. The importune prouo­cations of his ridiculous absurdities, I sometimes make merry & smile at, and sometime check with free, yet ingenious In [...]oco qui­modum adh [...]bet, is fest [...]vus seu vrbanus haben­dus. Qui mo­d [...]m excedit, scurra. Quià iocis omnino ab­horret, is rustici [...] & a [...]estis. Arist Eth. lib. 2 cap. 7. iest, the [Page] matter and occasion so requiring. His prowd insultings onely, stupiditie, senselesse securitie, and lethargie with needfull Castigare licet at (que) etiam expe­dit, immo neces­sarium est. Scal. gall, I also rowse and awake, not touching the person but the vice. Vnto prowd folly within moderate latitude exceeding, sufficeth a modest curb or quip discreetly falling. Obstinate and wilfull ex­cesse therein vrgeth and iustifieth a greater bitternesse, with cau­tion it be not sordid nor impious. Thus far vpon iust incitement to proceed is not Scurra is est qui risum magis qu m opo [...]tet mouet, & risum magis mouet quam vt hone­stè loquatur. Cicero. scurrilitie or Maledictum nihil habet pro­positi preter contumeliam. Contumelia pe­tusantiùs iacta­ta convitium, facetiùs vrbanitas nominatur. Cic. railing (as men not discerning, or the Apologist may mistraine) scurrilitie properly including ribaldrie, vndecent iest, fowle, or vnseemely scoffing, exceeding that comely mediocritie wherein consisteth the allowed vertue of vrbanity, elegant, wittie, sportiue, close taxing, or reproofe of pal­pably exposed foolery, whose insufferable ranknesse in due & well husbanded time, or place, not to nip or top, is idly and dully to suf­fer, and needlesly to continue or incourage. Knowe againe, and lastly (good Reader) That in this Antapologie I intend not to meddle with the materials, or fabricke of Aurum potabile, nor with the manuarie exploration thereof by others more profes­sedly therein exercised, exquisitly satisfied, but with the true touch and triall in right reason of D. Antony his promised de­monstration, and of his Philosophicall and Logicall proofes, con­tinually professed, and endlesly boasted in his Apologie: which how childishly, rudely, and rawly he hath performed shall now ap­peare in the Treatise following, Farewell.

Thy true frend warning both the pub­lique and thy priuate good from sly Imposture, IOHN COTTA.

CAP. I.

WHETHER your Aurum (D r An?) bee as truely potable as pottable, that is, as truely converted into potable liquor the content, as it may into pott the Continent, I meane not to dispute. Whether like­wise your aurum be aurum, I doe therein permit you vnto those lear­ned Censors who haue vndertaken you, who haue alreadie taken the even scales into their hands & haue proved your light weight therein. I wil not rob them of their due praise. I will only levill at your Apologie, being thence iniuriously awaked from my sleepie thoughts there­of. You haue divided it into two parts, the first is reason, the second is testimonies. I will therefore first declare all your reasons ioyntly and in generall, to be voyd and of noe vse, to proue the worth of your Aurum potabile to be allowed, or authorised. I will after descend into every single reason and position apart: some of your testimonies I will last call vnto their strict accompt. Concerning the invaliditie of your reasons in generall, knowe that [...]ose things which are pro­perly directed and immediately to be iudged and witnessed by the Necesse est in his à vi extrinse­ca & viso assen­tionem commo­veri. Cicero de Fato. sense, it is indirect and vaine to build their proofe vpon reasons. It were madnes at noone day when the sunne shineth in his brightnes to offer the proofes thereof by rea­son vnto an open and wellseeing eye. The right preparations [Page 2] of medicines and their compositions are to be iudged pro­perly and approved by the eye, by the tast, and by the cou­lor, and other outward testimonies from a iuditious view thereof, and by the outward senses. Reasons therefore herein are insufficient and deceivable satisfactions of the goodnes, truth, number of ingredients and right workmanship, in which the outward sense was ever chiefe Iustice and sole proper Iudge. Since then no man but your selfe hath as yet in every single concealed part, nor in your menstruall water (as you confesse) viewed or seene the right preparation and composition of your medicine, doe not vainely hope by the miste of needlesse and sophisticall reasons to moue the iudi­tious to giue credit thereto. Iust Cauendum est ne incognita pro cognitis habea­mus, ijs (que) temerè assentiamus, sed adhibeamus ad considerandas res & tempus & diligentiam. Cic. Offic. 1. men cannot be blamed in making doubt, howsoever men vnlearned, or not practised, or not exercised in iudging herein, may and are commonly perswaded and easily drawne. Thus much in generall con­cerning the want of reason in your reasons to satisfie reaso­nable men, for that excellency of your Aurum potabile. Now let vs singly drawe forth your severall weaknesses in your reasons & lame positions a part, halting through every scat­tered part of your whole worke. First for the vaine professi­on of that vnlimited vniversality in your Aurum potabile: vnderstand that all things vniversall are of three kinds. The first is vniversall in substance, in which sense no creature, but one only Deus est prin­cipium vniuer­sale non de essen­tia vniuersi, sed supra vniuersum Scaliger, Creatour of all things can be called vniversall. The second is vniversall in predication, and thus only Genus and Species the generall and speciall kinds of all things crea­ted are called vniversall. In this sense Aurum potabile can be no more vniversall then in the first, since it is a particular and individuall substance. The third is vniversall in power and in the generalitie and multiplicitie of divers ends and vses therein. In this sense only Aurum potabile can be vniversall. Now let vs see how farr this vniversalitie in this vnderstan­ding may extend. All things that are created haue their se­verall ends and vses for which they were created, and in [Page 3] those ends some are more proper vnto one Creature, some vnto another. Many ends and vses are common vnto many of them. But every one hath his owne proper Natura nihil fecit▪ frustra Aristot. inseparable end and vse vnto it selfe aboue and beyond all the rest. For this cause Philosophers say and truth doth iustifie, that every particular hath his owne distinct forme in it selfe by which it hath a peculiar Hinc illa [...]. being in it selfe, by which it is that it is solely vnto it selfe, and different from all other. As every thing hath his distinct and seperate forme vnto it selfe, so necessarily must it haue his speciall and proper qualities, ends and Forma & fi­nis in naturae o­peribus sunt v­solâ differunt ra­tione. vses, from thence derived vnto it selfe, by which it is different from all other vses, since God hath created no forme Nec frustra ac sine causa quid facere dig­num Deo est quod abhorret ab hominis constan­tia. Cicero 2. de without his owne proper and speciall indowment. This is the reason of Aristotle his [...] vnum ad vnum, that is, every thing was made vnto one mayne end or Vnius causae vna est actio per se, plures per ac­cidens. Vnius rei vnica forma, vnias ar­tis vnus finis. vse, although therof might be made many common vses besides: as is instanced concerning the Gladius Delphicus. If this be a truth that never was nor can be denyed, then is it manifest and certaine that Aurum potabile cannot yeeld or afford any of those speciall properties or vertues which God and na­ture haue only made and tyed appropriate vnto other speci­all formes alone, be they of medicinall vse or whatsoever els. For formes are infinite and extend as farr as Ens it selfe, since there is, nor can be no being without a forme. A necessary conclusion from hence doth vnavoidably and vnanswerably issue that Aurum potabile granted his owne peculiar vertue proper vnto his owne forme, whatsoever vertues it hath be­side it, it hath in common with many other medicines, and therefore cannot challenge the properties of all other vnto it selfe alone, nor exclude other from the participation in com­mon with it. And hence it is also evident that Aurum potobile can haue no other vniversality then is equally contingent vnto other things, creatures or medicines aswell as vnto it selfe. Vnto this infallible proofe of reason, it is easie by infi­nite instances to giue illustration. It is cleare that in many [Page 4] common cases Aurum potabile is drosse and counterfeite with many vulgar things compared. In a vehement burning thirst a cupp of small beere, nay a cup of water is both more vsefull and more necessary. In a consumption there are many better restauratiues, yea a messe of porrage well ordered without comparison is more proper, and in hunger and ne­cessity of nourishment farre more pretious. In a dangerous surfeit all the gold in the world reduced into whatsoever potability, spirit or essence is nothing so ready, so prosperous, so present a remedy, as any common vulgar matter, that may procure in the beginning the disgorging of the cause. The like may be said concerning any mortall poyson, swal­lowed into the stomacke. Will any man be so madd as to trust vnto the glorious vniversality of Aurum potabile, who can procure the present revomition of the substance of the poyson, by any small trifle procuring vomitt? In an exquisite Synodius, Phrensie, Peripueumonia, Augnia Pluresie, and in many innumerable other peracute diseases, rising from the offensiue quantity and corrupt quality of the blood, that little Iron and small instrument wherewith the Surgion doth phlebotomize, is a much more speedy, sovereigne and saving remedy: Thus what nature, what reason, what instances doe manifest we manifestly see. Now let vs returne to view what the Myntmaster and Coyner of Aurum potabile doth pre­sumptuously pronounce. Speaking of his Aurum potabile page 4 he vttereth these prodigious words Id nimirum omnes iam dictorum, nec non aliorum simplicum facultatis aequat, nec hoc salum, sed multis modis superat, that is, It doth not only equall, but exceed many degrees the vertues and faculties of al those things before mentioned and of other simples. Those things which were before mentioned were Vineger, Rhu­barbe, Nitre, Lead, Quicksiluer, Vitriol, Champhre, inclu­ding with these innumerable more. Here we see his open and expressed profession that▪ Aurum potabile doth not only con­taine in it selfe the vses and vertues of all medicines in gene­rall, [Page 5] but of every speciall throughout the generall, and of every particular comprehended vnder the specialls, for these particulars before mentioned are all of severall kinds and species. This is a wonder, a miracle, a mystery. Many vses in­deed God hath given vnto many particular things vnder the same kind, but all the severall specificall vses of all other things of the same kind given vnto any one particular alone, nature did never knowe, nor the Sunne it selfe in this sublu­nary world did euer behold, Looke through all the Coasts and Corners of the world, pervse the Catalogue of all the in­finite bounties and guifts of God and nature in all kinds, a­mong them all, is not to be found, such an vniversality in an vnity, or an vnity of such vniversality. No man, no age, no art, no science hath at any time knowne it. Of the impossibi­litie also thereof as in reason, so in religion the demonstration is evident. God hath created nothing in vaine nor needlesly. All things are good which he hath made, and certainly if good, then good for some good end and for some good vse. If every particular thing created, hath his particular good particular vse and end, Aurum potabile his vse is likewise but particular and can exclude no one thing created whatso­ever from a particular goodnes and vse, contayned in it selfe and not in another. This all ages, all times, all nations and people long before Aurum potabile was borne, haue euer witnessed, and are able to giue the contrary affirmation, the lie vnto the face of the divell and the Apologist, creating so foule a monster, out of the order and rule of all things crea­ted by God. Many excellent things hath God created for man, which haue many excellent vses; He hath created the medicines of the earth Ecclesiasticus 36.4. and among them many haue their many excellent vses, but any one creature or medicine whatsoeuer contayning in it selfe alone all the vses of all other things of the same kind or frustrating or making needlesse any one vse or good quality giuen by God to any one particular whatsoeuer, as to affirme it, is in reason im­possible, [Page 6] in nature monstrous, so in religion most impious. Now let vs heare what the Apologist saith. It is not sufficient (saith the Apologist page 5 [...]ine 8) to call Aurum potabile Polycreston, but it must be Pancreston that is, restrictiuely to be a thing having variety and multiplicitie of vses, is not at­tribute competent or equall, but it must be absolute of infi­nite vses, excluded out of no vse. In his preface vnto the Rea­der he tearmeth it Materia vniuersalis perse, that is a thing materially or in the materiall substance by it selfe alone vni­versall. Behold the face of Idolatry page 61 of the English coppie, he likewise aboue the capacitie or reach of reason avowcheth that his Medicine neuer hurt any but euer profi­ted all. The same he iterateth page 107 and page 122. Hee further avowcheth, page 97 of the Latin coppie that if it happen into the hands of an vnskilfull dispensor, it cannot notwithstanding by the most envious, be once instanced in any particular to haue giuen somuch as occasion of hurt, which is incident to other excellent remedies. From abuse by man there was neuer as yet any sublunary thing created by God for man absolute or free, how then can this Creature alone of his creation be excepted without impiety and intol­lerable arrogancie. page 55: he appropriateth this divine and miraculous medicine vnto himselfe, saying that after God it bringeth most present remedie. Thus he maketh himselfe and his medicine, or himselfe in his medicine solely God his se­cond; In the same place he doth proclayme it to haue place where no Physitian or Physick humane can giue remedie or helpe, but onely the Celestiall and divine or heauenly, page 121. of the English coppie he saith it is of generall and extra­ordinary effects in all diseases, sexes, ages, circumstances. The impossibility of these assertions in reason in nature, in Gods decree, all honest and wise men consider. Now let vs duely examine whether his owne conscience also doe not check it selfe herein; certainly in many places his own falfe tongue, be­trayeth his double and guilefull thoughts. Read page 15. [Page 7] line 2. 3. 4. 5. of the latin coppy. Nihilominus hic considerari velim, & caetera. There he confesseth that there is no such ne­cessity of Aurum potabile but that by other meanes as well as by it, men may aspire vnto the top and perfection of phy­sicall curation, as also that there are other wayes vnto the same wood for health aswell as by that. These words are left out in the english Coppie, see page 18 thereof. Reade his pre­face also vnto the Reader, there he confesseth that he vseth and mixeth other Vegetables in the administration and dis­pensation of his Aurum potabile, and he commendeth the same vse and custome vnto the rationall and learned physiti­an. Behold how truth here vnawares stealeth out of his owne mouth. How farr in divers other places his tong hath over­runne his wit, in the reasonles and boundles adoration of his golden incomparable vniuersality, is not before obscure. Here now see how by his owne mouth that Pancreston, that vnlimited vniuersality that adaequation of temper in it selfe, reducing all other things into temper page. 4. 5. is here con­tented in it selfe not to be so absolute, but to borrow assi­stance, and many vses of other discrepant and different things or natures. Yea he doth in the same place acknowledge it to be requisite prudence to adioyne them vnto his vniuersall medicine: and commendeth it vnto the rationall and iuditious physitians discretion therein. Thus vsuall and easie is it for men who either desire to dissemble those things they knowe, or intend to iustifie those things which they knowe vniust, to be betrayed by their owne memory and to contradict them­selues. And thus by nature, by reason, by his owne positions and confession, is the vniuersality of the Apologist his Au­rum potabile from the vnlimited stiles, the intollerable titular transcendence and sole supremacy reduced vnto more mo­dest and moderate termes, yea euen by pronunciates out of his owne mouth. Mistake not (worthy Reader) I doe not denie that golde it selfe in medicine hath many excellent v­ses. I denie not divers wayes of the profitable and vsefull [Page 8] preparation. I doe ingeniously graunt that gold in his owne kinde (although questioned in D r Anth. his preparation) may be, and is an excellent medicine, as divers other excellent me­dicines in other kinds are, but his excessiue and vnreasonable extolling thereof beyond measure and meane, and the slaun­derous derogation thereby from all other blessed remedies, vnto which God their Creator hath giuen their seuerall di­stinct specifical vertues aswell as vnto Aurum potabile, is that which modest eares do abhorr, and I cannot but iustly taxe. I will therefore conclude with that necessary castigation of Libauius no obscure Alchymist, and who hath described and taught divers wayes of the fabrick of Aurum potabile in di­vers kinds and manners. Aurum dicitur (saith he Alchem. part 2. lib. 1.) adversus omnes morbos Alexiterium catholicum. Sed cum non peccetur vno modo, nec morbi fint vnius naturae ne­queant (que) omnes ad commune principium sanativum reduci, ap­paret Paracelsicos transgressos esse veterum sensa, & hiperboli­câ laude, aurum infame reddidisse. That is gold is said a gene­rall Cordiall against all diseases, but since errors happen not all after one way or manner, neither are all diseases of one kind or nature, nor can be brought all into one kind, principle or way of cure, it is apparent that the Paracelsians haue trans­gressed the rules, sense and meaning of the Ancients, and with their vnmeasurable and hyperbolicall praises haue now pro­cured the very name of gold to be in disgrace and infamous. Looke vpon this glasse (D r Anth.) and view therein the face of your owne follie. Assuredly if all your pronunciats before mentioned concerning your Aurum potabile, might bee in proofe and triall found true, it must necessarily be convinced to be magicall. Omnis materia subijcitur vicissitudini mutatio­num (saith Aristotle) that is, whatsoeuer is compounded of an elementary matter is subiect vnto variation, mutations and alterations of all kinds. Nothing can be so generally or vniuersally vnto all vses in any kind the same, but it must vary, differ, and be mutable in his vse and vertue according [Page 9] to euery circumstance which vsually doth happen vnto all things mortall. Casus & tempus, omnibus rebus accidit saith Ecclesiastes 9.11. Chaunce & time happeneth vnto all things. If you will therefore proue that your potabile aurum is the same euer in all diseases not variable therein, not failing or immutable, alwayes by it selfe fit, in all sexes, ages and di­stempers, then is it exempt from the course, order and nature of all sublunarie things. Vpon this ground and proposition, will invincibly follow a conclusion: that it is a diabolicall and inchaunted medicine. Your owne lipps haue beene your accusers, and out of your owne mouth men will iudge you. Now bring forth your medicine to proue your selfe an ho­nest man. Conceale it not, make it knowne in euery part and particle, in your Aqua menstrualis aswell as in all other parts, since the diuell Si Medicus paret remedia domi suae poterit, im­pune pro melle, aconitum praebere aegro, ignis enim poterit fraudē detegere? Riolanus in liban. Man and imposture may hide themselues therein, aswell as in any other parcell belonging thereto. Let your rich marchandize, therein your vnlimited commoditie perswade you no longer to conceale it. Bring it forth (I say) put it vpō the triall, let it vndergo no secret nor priuy, but the open verdict of all good men. You haue (no doubt) greater worth in your selfe, then that, to vphold and maintaine you; your trust is not soly therein: For your owne iustification, for your credit, for the common good publish and comunicate it vnto all. Let it proue it selfe by it selfe, and no longer hide the face for any priuate respect. There is no good man will or can conceale any secret, vpon so iust and requisite challenge. Thus much concerning your straggling proiects in praise of Aurum potabile. Now let vs descend into your particular reasons in order as they are proposed to de­fend his vniuersality and the arrogation of supreame worth and dignitie.

CAP. II.

The first Reason.

IN a golden subiect behold a leaden argument, thus the Apologist doth reason. The rationall Physitians denie not Polycreston, therefore why may there not be Pancre­ston? that is the rationall Physitians haue their divers medi­cines to serue generally for many vses and causes, and there­fore why may there not be one single medicine so noble, a­boue and beyond all other, as to serue for all vses, An excel­lent sequele; his proposing his argument in forme of a que­stion intimateth his owne mistrust thereof. It was not safe to trust it with a Syllogisme, and therefore (there being no o­ther possible way to leaue it vnanswerable) he runneth away without an answere, and omitting his assumption, swiftly concludeth his Aurum potabile to be that Pancreston, not e­qualling, but farr exceeding the vertues and qualities of all other medicines, and in all kinds and vses, particularizing in Rhubarb, Vineger, Quicksiluer, and including in these innu­merable more. For the better apprehension of the dangerous­ly pointed sharpnes and keene edge of this fierce argument, let vs according to the lawes of regular combate in all dis­putes require him to enter within the Syllogisticall lists. Therein thus doth the argument advance it selfe.

The Argument.

Maior.If there are in nature, and allowed among the dogmaticall Physitians many single medicines that are of manifold vses, then there may be one medicine more noble then all the rest, that may not only equall, but excell all the rest in all vses.

Minor.But there are in nature, and allowed among Physitians many single medicines that are of manifold vses, Ergo There [Page 11] may be one single medicine more noble then the rest, that may not only equall but exceed all the rest in all vses,

The Answere.

Ad veritatem conditionalis affirmatiuae requiritur vt con­sequens ex antecedete recte inferatur, as saith Aristotle [...], that is in an hypotheticall or conditionall affirma­tiue proposition, it is required that the consequent be right­ly inferred vpon, or from the Antecedent. How different the former maior is herein, euery meane witt doth wott. His scope is to evict such a noble medicine, as might exceed all other medicines in all properties and vses. This evicted or proved, the next intention is to proue Aurum potabile to bee that noble medicine. The first, how slenderly he hath proved is not obscure. The second he doth not so much as touch or nominate. And thus concluding nothing, he notwithstanding presumeth all, that euery vulgar may discerne the slendernes of this reason though his first, and planted in the forefront. This is the wholl substance thereof in the plainest tearmes. There are in some or divers particulars many excellent qua­lities or properties. Ergo there may be one particular where­in alone may be all those excellent qualities conioyned. That there are some or divers particulers which haue excellent qualities need not any proofe, nor is serviceable vnto his pur­pose at all, since though it be true, it doth not necessarily in­ferr, that there is any one particular that hath all these qua­lities or properties vnto it selfe. If it were likewise graunted that there may be such a particular in which may be all those properties, yet doth not that proue the particular by him na­med to be that particular. For example, let the Apologist thus reason concerning himselfe. There haue beene or are ma­ny Antonyes in whom are many excellent qualities, therefore there may be one Antony in whom alone all these qualities may be conioyned. It may be graunted true that there haue beene many Antonyes of excellent qualities, yet doth not [Page 12] that proue that there is any one Antony in whom are all those qualities. And if it were proved that there is one such Anto­ny, yet doth it not proue D r Antony, to be that one Antony. The like may be said concerning his Aurum potabile. It is not denied that there are some medicines in which are many ex­cellent qualities and vses. This notwithstanding doth not proue that there is any one medicine in which are all those qualities or vses. And if it were confessed that there might be one such medicine, yet doth it not necessarily inferr that Au­rum potabile is that medici [...]e. And thus doth the follie and falla [...]y of this first reason appeare, disputing from a knowne reall being in one thing, vnto an imagined posse or possibilitie in another. A great cry and a little woll. This argument see­meth like vnto that monster in Martial.

Si solum spectes hominis caput, Hectora credes
Sistantem videas Astianacta putes.
Behold the head (the heady daring pride)
Mounts like a gyant frightfully espide.
But vew the leggs (which are the reasons small)
Alas poore Titt, it cannot stand withall.

The Second Reason.

Most diseases consist (saith the Apologist) in distemper, Ergo the most temperate medicines are the best remidies to reduce them into temper. A man by this your argumentati­on, may guesse that you either never read, or now forgett to distinguish that part of Physicke which is called [...] from that which is called [...]. The first doth serue properly to direct to keepe or conserue the body in health. The second doth guide vnto the reductiō of the body into health againe, being therein decayed. As while the body is in health it is a­gainst reason and rule to assume thereinto things that are in­temperate, for feare of begetting distemper thereby, so when the body is sicke and distempered, it is not only art, but com­mon [Page 13] sense and reason to endeavour to bring it into health and temper, by such differing and contrary things as many­festly alter and change the distemperature. It is true, in the conservation of health, those things which are most tempe­rate are most fitt. First because they breed no excesse. Second­ly because they being more neere and like with lesse offence & alteration they are at any time added or conioyned where vse and need is. For this cause it is as truly, as anciently said Similima, Similimis conservantur. In diseases and distempers the case is otherwise. There the maine respect and indication is the reduction of distemper into temper. This is not done by things alike or temperate, but by things contrary, So saith Hypocrates Aph. 19. lib. 5. Contrariorum contraria est ratio? I pray tell me (good S r) in a cold stomacke is a draught of tem­perate ale, better, or a ginger spiced cup? If your braine haue lost his common sense, aske your stomacke when it is op­pressed with cold. Is there not a manyfest difference of beni­fitt vnto a cold digestion betweene a draught of temperate beare or other like liquor and a cup of wine that doth many­festly heate? Doth not experience avouch that Diatrion-pipe­rion, Diaga langa, Diacumini, things of a sensible excesse in heate do farr more happily and presently warme a cold, raw, and windie belly then Aromaticum Rosatum or any other compounds of the like more temperate simples. Who will denie that methridat is hott and in the same vse, diascordium more temperate. In a case wherein they are both in the gene­rall, profiittable, if there be in some one particular respect a more speciall necessity of heating. Who will not preferr the first before the second, and the second also before the first, where is more danger or feare of heate? It is not therefore the even temper of qualities, but the manifest odds of qualities that vsually in contrary distempers of the body doth both indeed and really and also to the sense and feeling of every man, profitt himselfe and correct his distemper. Thus farr hath better reason then (it seemeth is knowne vnto your [Page 14] selfe) offered vnto you spectacles through which it is easie to see and consider the slender weight and worth of this your worthlesse reason. Let vs now review it with better eyes, thus must your reason necessarily reason syllogised.

If most diseases consist in distemper, then that which is most temperate is the best remedie. But most diseases con­sist in distemper Ergo That which is most temperate is best remedie.

The vacillation and falsehood both of Maior and Minor is euident; for if all or most diseases did alone consist in di­stemper (as they doe not) yet would not that rightly in­ferre, that therefore those things which are most temperate, are the best remedies, since it is apparent (as is before pro­ued) that by contraries those things which are intemperate, are onelie reduced or brought to be temperate. The weaknes and vntruth of the Minor also, is vndoubtedly mantfest vnto all well exercised Physitians, who most seldome meete with such diseases as solely and simply grow from distemper a­lone, no disease almost, or generallie, or for the most part pre­senting it selfe, which beside the distemper, hath not an of­fensiue quantitie or burden of euill and vitious humors, as true cause thereof. Thus the Maior and Minor, failing the hope of any good conclusion, is verie slender. And thus also is the second reason of the Apologist like vnto the first, and both like himselfe, all in showes and boasting shadowes, no­thing in truth and substance. Notwithstanding because wee will not altogether dispoile him, and leaue him naked, hauing alreadie disarmed him, we will out of our tender hearts, yeeld and allow vnto the temperate remedies, in distempers some place or respect, although he neither doth or can winne it, or deserue it at our hands. We must necessarily here distinguish, concerning distempers. There is a distemper farre exceeding temper, and there is a distemper within the latitude of tem­per, that is not much wanting or differing from temper, though perfectly or strictly no temper. In that distemper [Page 15] Iutemperies quae non longe à mediecritate re­cessit, similibus conservatur, quae absit longiùs contrariis corri­gitur, & ad tem­periem reduci­tur. Galen. lib. de constit. Artis. which is within some latitude of temper, that is, within some reasonable tearmes of temper, or not too much excee­ding temper, temperate remedies, or not exceeding in any ma­nifest qualitie, may happily helpe to reduce vnto temper. But in that distemper, wherein is manifest excessiue oddes, it is be­yond all latitude extreamelie false, that remedies within the latitude of temper, or that are temperate, should reduce the temper. For example, if a man be distempered with an ex­cessiue, violent, or furious heate, there temperate remedies betweene heate and colde are soone mastered and made fru­strate, or profit little, or for a short time. But where a man is distempered with heate, in a small excesse, or very slender degree, there temperate things, though they cannot mani­festly coole, yet may they somewhat refresh by their propin­quitie and nearenesse vnto requisite and desired cooling. If these like temperate things in such a case, carrie with their temperature a Cordiall qualitie, then may they much more in that respect be prosperous. Thus it is clearelie distinguished how farre foorth that which is temperate, may reduce into temper that which is intemperate, as also where it shalbe so farre from giuing temper, that it shalbe ouercome of the di­stemper. This may now bee applied vnto Aurum potabile. His excellent temper (if it bee so temperate in Antonie's preparation, as it is in his predication) may in some degrees of distemper profite; but in [...] a manifest excesse of any grand distemper in true reason and nature, the temperature must ne­cessarilie bee so farre from reducing into temper, that it may rather therein loose his vse and temper, and neuer finde it selfe like it selfe. Thus you haue good reason for your money, for your gold, for your liquor, which out of reason, and beyond reason, you would extoll. As your reasons in their proofe come lame, halting and limping home, so your flourishing shewes of some scholasticall termes, are meere termes without their true sense, and rightly apprehended fubstance. This is seene in your palpable ignorance, endeavouring to salue that [Page 16] oracle of Hyppocrates, Contraria contrarijs curantur. That you may not disparage your Aurum potaebile from the opini­on of curing contrary distempers (which you auouch there­of) & yet may withal hold it to be temperate, you pronounce (extreame contrary to all learning) that the meane or tem­per is contrary vnto the extreames. As if vnderstanding men could be so blinded or enchanted by your mists of seeming learning, as not to distinguish how a meane and temper, vnto an extreame or distemper, may in a large or loose sense bee tearmed contrary; and yet in the true and exquisite nature of contraries, be indeed no contrary. I will in few words, make this your grosse errour more plaine. The question is, whether Aurum potabile by it selfe doe cure contrary distempers, do actually resist in cold diseases, cold; in hot diseases, heat. You affirme it, and thus you would proue your affirmation. Con­traries (say you) doe cu e contraries. Aurū potabile is a con­trary, & therefore it doth cure contraries. Your Minor, viz. that Aurum potabile is a contrary you thus proue. It is a thing temperate, therefore it is contrary to that which is intempe­rate. See now the fallacy. You hold the word contrary, but you are already runne beyond the sense of your proposed contrary. Our proiect & mention was concerning such con­traries, as directly, immediatly, and actually oppose & resist each other, (as heat, cold; drinesse, moisture; in the question first propounded doe oppose really one the other) and now you slip from that contrary vnto another kinde of contrary, and in another respect so called, namely vnto such a contrary as is no reall actiue contrary, but a meere Non contrari­um sed contra­dictorium. vide Scalig. exercit. 5. sect. 1. negatiue contra­ry, as you may learne out of Aristotle in his tract de contra­rie oppositis. Either you are herein a cunning Iuglar, or else you simply and ignorantly offer this confusion of vnderstan­ding. If it be simplicity, then it were needfull you went a­gaine vnto schoole to learne Logicke. If it be in you inten­ded deceit and cosonage, then ought it be sent to the house of Correction. Reuiew now your reasoning. If it should bee compelled into the forme of a Syllogisme, according vnto [Page 17] the lawes of disputation, it would be seene euidently to hault or rather to be a monster standing vpon foure legs. It must needs haue foure termes. Notwithstanding you are so blindly prowd and confident herein, that for a farther proofe or illustration of your assertion, of a meane to be a contrary, you insist in the morall meane betweene the two contrary ex­treames, vice and vertue. Liberality, say you, is contrary vn­to both his extreames, both vnto niggardly tenacity, & pro­digall profusion. They are contraries indeed, but as negatiues meerely, not in reall excesse of operatiue qualities, since the meane hath no excesse at all and is of another kinde from the extreames, and truly properly and immediatly comprehen­ded vnder mediocrity, as his true and immediate kinde. As is said concerning the morall contraries, so may bee said of the mediocrity of temper in Aurum potabile. As it is temperate, it is in a sort cōtrary vnto those things that are intemperate, that is, it is in contradiction vnto h [...]s extreames contrary, but that doth not proue it in reall actiue force, or resistance of manifest qualities contrary. Thus where you should haue proued Aurum potabile chaulke, you goe about to prooue it cheese, yea and cheese because chaulke. This is cheese to choake a Daw, as saith the country prouerb. The case is alike: Aurum potabile is temperate, Aurum potabile is contrary, and therefore (say you) contrary because temperate. That you may hereafter in this matter reason more pertinently with­out such confusion, and may more distinctly therein appre­hend your selfe, I will giue you some few obseruations. First, knowe what Aristotle saith concerning things temperate, Qua ad mediocritatem redacta sunt, non amplius agunt, quippe adepta sunt finem, that is, things temperate in any manifest qualitie haue no reall action or resistance, because they haue already gained the end of their strife or opposition, which is perfection in temper. Touch the temper of your gold with this touch-stone. Secondly, remember that true and reall contraries doe extreamely, or in an extreame degree or di­stance, [Page 18] actually in manifest qualities, oppose each other with vehement resistance, Mutuo se expellunt, maximè à se invicem distant. Weigh your gold in this ballance. Thirdly, rub your memory, and call to minde, that contraries properly so cal­led, are both contained vnder the same kinde or genus contra­ria sunt sub eodem genere posita, vt Aristotles [...]. Here againe examine your gold doth it now proue it selfe vn­to reason, truely and really such a contrary, as according to nature, and ordinary course of nature, doth actually and im­mediately resist and oppose contrary distempers? Reason doth deny, and iust proofe hath forsaken it. Ponder then and con­sider your trifling argumentation. Be ashamed of such shame­full juggling with God, with truth, with men. God doth see you, truth shall iudge you, and wise men shall laugh you to scorne. If knowingly you haue proposed it, you are an Im­postor and deceiuer, if simply and vnadvisedly, the fault is lesse, but the follie and ignorance is more remarkeable and notorious. I might here marke (in way of corollary to con­clude) your overplus of attributes, vnto the good temper of Aurum potabile. The vse and force of the manifest elemen­tary qualities therein, haue beene proued (like it selfe) in the meane, and limited within a mediocrity. The occult proper­ties doe immediatly issue from the specificall forme, vnto the better exertion Temperamen­tum est quasi in­strumentum for­mae ad conserva­tionem, sed non est per se causa. Scal. ex. 204. se. 2 and conservation whereof the good temper doth onely giue the better vigoration. For this cause (saith Aristotle) the bone is bone; the flesh, flesh; the muscles, mus­cles; the contemper of the Elements, or their temperate mix­ture, is not the cause, but some more divine and excellent gift, or indowment of Nature, which notwithstanding requireth a due proportion of temper in elementary qualities to con­curre therewith. Who is so madde as to imagine, that those seuerall distinct properties in Pearle, Amber, Corall, Bezar, and innumerable moe, are to bee attributed vnto their tem­per. There is a a certaine fit proportion of temperature, neces­sary vnto euery one of them, but it is their seuerall formes, [Page 19] and not the temper, which giueth vnto them their distinct beings and vses apart. Your praise therefore was ouer-flow­ingly vnadvised, that attributeth altogether vnto the adequa­tion of temper in Aurum potabile, & so sparingly mentioneth, and silently omitteth the specificall forme, wherein more tru­ly and properly consisteth the true worth thereof. Let vs now come to your third Reason.

The third Reason.

The 3. Reason entereth with the praises of Aurum pota­bile. It tempereth (saith D r An) the distempers of the heart, which bring sicknesses and death it selfe. It communicateth temper and comfort vnto the heart, by which the heart doth defend it selfe, both from the distempers derived thereto from all other ill-disposed parts of the bodie, and also communi­cateth vnto all other parts howsoeuer affected, the commu­nion and participation with it of his refreshing and strength. Aurum potabile possesseth many occult properties in nature. For further collaudations and powers therein, he transmitteth vs vnto his former Tractate, vnto classicall Authors, vnto Ar­noldus de villa nova more particularly, and lastly turneth him­selfe about againe, and returneth to relate his owne opinion, and there addeth, that it excelleth all other things in the most exquisite temper; that it is a thing incorruptible, either by wa­ter, or fire, or earth, and it is the image of terrene eternitie. That there is in it a double temper, an Arithmeticall, and a Geometricall. Hee displayeth the difference betweene gold potable, and gold in the solid substance: as concerning the formall and agent qualities in the one, much more energeticall then in the other. He testifieth the familiarity, friendship, loue and sympathie betweene it and the heart, the incompa­rable power thereof in repairing the decaied humidum radicale vsually induced by the consuming secret fire of the lifes natu­rall heate, and the staving of, and retardation of the irresista­ble and fatall ingruence of old age. Thus swallowed with ob­livion, [Page 20] he neuer draweth out or vnsheatheth his third argu­ment at all, but presumeth it sufficient solely to haue obtru­ded the Crambe, of the so oft and weariesomely inculcated praises of Aurum potabile. Good Sir, though you extoll your Aurum with the tower of Babel to reach to the hea­uens, it will in the end notwithstanding, of the owne naturall accord, descend vnto the proper place. We will spend no time in making reply thereto, you cannot be ignorant, that euery vulgar Antidotarie or dispensatorie, doth afford lauda­torie lectures, as liberally concerning multitudes of other me­dicines, as you doe of this. Euery Mountbanke in this kinde, will stare you out of countenance. Praises are windie bables. It is easie vpon a Mould-hill, to founde a Mountaine of vaine­glorious tearmes. View Ʋirgill his Culex or Gnat. Your course Genius can neuer aspire vnto that terse, elegant, wittie, prettie contriuement, poeticall sweet straine, wherewith he hath tuned, and most delightfully sung the exuberant praise of that small-creeping flye, or flying worme. How ingeni­ously doth he make the praises exceed the matter, and yet the matter no more then it selfe, the jest seeming serious, and the serious no jest. Read Cornelius Agrippae de laude stultitiae, you shall see with how sportiue a wit, or wittie sport, he jesteth with good earnest, in extolling that quality, wherein thorow your whole Apologie you doe exceed and riot. Let praises therefore passe, you promised a third argument, we expect that, since praises are not proofes. Perhaps you will say, that you had come vnto your argument at last, if your memory had not met with a rubbe, which carried your byas out of the way. An abiect obiection forsooth, did take you aside, and whispered in your eare, that Aurum potabile being a thing in manifest qualities, manifestly temperate, could not possibly, or in any true or sound reason or judgment, produce or exercise any manifest ope­ration. In ouer-zealous desire of answere of the objection, you cast away the matter in hand vtterly, and forgetting both [Page 21] your selfe and it, runne headlong into an old song, oft before chatteringly chaunted, videlicet, that Aurum potabile is tem­perate in qualities, and yet so excelling therein, that it is able to master, or quell any opposing or resisting contrary what­soeuer. This is an vgly monster in reason or nature. If you had once sollidly proued this assertion, the hated repetition might be better digested, but in your proofes hetherto so slightly trifling and performing shadowes, the grosnesse of your contradictions must needs beget a loathing of the rank­nesse of such rawe learning. You doe not vnderstand what it is, petere principium, or to dispute ex non concessis, otherwise you might conceaue, how vnsauory it is vnto men learned, to heare you so oft and rudely harping vpon one and the same iarring string, and yet suppose that it is sufficient pleasing musicke. I will therefore in this your inculcation of the same former error, confute you likewise by referring you vnto my former confutation thereof in your second reason. Marke it well, and if you meane to make it your marke whereat to shoot your bolt, looke you misse it not, nor take it amisse, least as you haue in this your Apologie iniuriously quartred me, so in the next replication, I hang in so equall ballance, that your least want of waight shall not escape the seuerest censure. Your concluding here without premisses, meerely vpon praises, your reasoning without reason, your iterated iugling of Simile vnto Contrarium, and Contrarium into Si­mile: of Aurum potabile sometimes into both, sometimes in­to neither, sometimes into either, I doe with equall recipro­cation answere and not answere. In your second reason I an­swere the third, and therefore the third because the second. It is true, and not true: and therefore true because not true. And this is according vnto your excellent temper, and yet con­trary, and therefore contrary because temper. Thus haue I answerably, or as fitteth in answere, toied with your toies, and put a tricke vpon your trickes, hoping as it is in me, only of your image and example, the representatiue, so it may bee [Page 22] in your vse, as in my end instructiue, and that your owne fol­ly in a third person, may better, & more vnpartially appeare vnto your selfe. If notwithstanding all this my care & paines you will not be reformed, I end with that of Quintilius in Horace.

Quin sine rivali te (que) & tua solus amato.
Your selfe-loue be it nere so much
There's no competitour need grutch.

The fourth Reason.

Aurum potabile (saith our disputant) is an vniuersall me­dicine, in consideration of the nature of the sicke, or of the dis­ease or sicknesse. For if the disease doth lie vpon the patient as a burthen, and the strength is not sufficient to beare or en­dure it vnto the end, what is here to be done? Whether is the strength to be maintained and cherished, that it may endure and beare the burthen, or to bee ouerthrowne, or perish by attempting to remoue the burthen? This is his wise propose to no purpose. What if it should bee granted vnto him that euery disease is a burthen which nature is not sufficient to endure, and that in such a case the strength of nature is to be altogether cherished and fostered, and not by any endeauour of remouall of her burthen to be iniured or oppressed? What will he inferre herevpon? It doth not follow from hence, Ergo, Aurum potabile is an vniuersall medicine, which he pro­poundeth as his intended conclusion. It only from hence can follow, or inferre, ergo Aurum potabile, in the proposed par­ticular case may doe good. But hee frameth from his former discourse this consequence, or collection, forsooth that euery disease may bee mastered, or cured, through the strength of nature, by the helpe of Cordialls. And from hence haply hee hopeth it may be with some likelihood conceaued and gran­ted that Aurum potabile being a Cordiall, may bee hereby concluded an vniversall medicine. This is farre fetched and about the bush. If we should bountifully, or rather prodi­gally [Page 23] yeeld vnto him both the former propositions, yet doe they neither iointly nor apart inferre his conclusion, which notwithstanding, in them both he promised and propounded in the very first words of his reason. Thus therefore failing and wandring out of the way, at length hee borroweth the helpe of Mules to drawe him out of the mire of his fowly confused, and inexplicate reason. As it falleth out (saith hee) with Mules that carry burthens, so doth it with the sicke. It is not fit alwaies to take of the burthen that they may feed. It is more trouble and hinderance indeed vnto the idle driuer (as in his owne experience the Apologist hath haply some­times found) it is more trouble, I say, to the driuer, in feeding or refreshing his Mules, to take downe their packes or bur­thens, but if the poore Mules could speake, they would tell you from their owne manifest sense, that it were more ease and pleasure vnto them, to feed without the incumbrance of their loads vpon their backes in the interim. And common experience doth tell vs that burthens are vsually remooued from the trauelling or laboring beast, not onely when they goe daily vnto their rest, but vpon many other occasions. The Apologist compareth his sicke patients vnto Mules, but he vseth them worse, if hee tie them perpetually vnto their burthens, and tell them for their comforts, that Aurum pota­bile shall refresh them, and inable them to beare them still. No doubt but they had rather be rid of their burthens, then comforted to beare them. Every disease is not such a bur­then as is impossible to be remoued, and in those kindes, they are nor only made Mules, but Asses, that for Aurum po­tabile his sake will beare them still. Many diseases there are exceeding tolerance, and greater then can long be borne, if not either in part lightned, or lessned, or wholly remoued; and Aurum potabile cannot make them lesse. In both these cases, or kindes of diseases, Aurum potabile is of small vse. In the one, the burthen being wholly remoued, is of no vse at all. In the other, vntill the burthen be otherwise remoued, it [Page 24] can be onely a comfort or reliefe in the misery, but no release from the misery. This, all Physitians know to be vndoubted in their patients, howsoeuer Groomes doe practise in their mules. There is a plethora ad vasa, and a plethora ad vires. The first is a weight or burthen so farre aboue measure, that the vessell cannot oft hold it without danger of breaking. The other exceedeth not the capacitie of the continent vessels, but is more then the strength can tolerate, except in some part vn­loaded. The like may be said of Cacochymia, or excesse of vi­tious humors out of the vessels. All these sorts of burthens are common in most diseases. In all these it is better to be de­liuered from their incumbrance and oppression, then to bee comforted and refreshed to beare their loade. It is true, where it is not possible to remoue them securely with any safety, there it remaineth onely vnto confirmation and comfortation of the strength with more ease to endure them. But this is not an vsuall or ordinarie condition in all, or most diseases. In ma­ny diseases the cause remoueable being remoued, health doth follow spontaneously, and vntill it be remoued, there can be otherwise no possibilitie thereof. In many diseases it is im­possible to remoue the cause, and that remaining, there is no possibilitie in Cordials, or any other meanes to cure them. Where they may be remoued, shall Aurum potabile perswade to keepe them? Where they are not to be remoued, can Au­rum potabile be esteemed any more then a Palliatiue, a Flatte­rer, a Iuggler, a Cosner of opinion or paine for a time? It is a wonder to see how these drivers of Mules suppose the world a generation of fooles, and studie to beget and multiplie (as they suppose) among asses soles, for the propagation of their vaine-glorious heresie, and grand imposture. Wee haue not hetherto found the least weight or worth in any one reason. This last reason offered in forme of a question (as is his mysti­call guilefull maner in them all) is for want of good deliuery, so deformed and disfigured, that it can hardly be reduced into any forme or figure of right dispute, or the vnmeasurable in­definities [Page 25] thereof be fashioned into any moode or measure, that may containe his promised purpose in any sort. It is far more easie to driue one of his Mules into a pinfold, then to drawe him into a Syllogisme that may hold him within his lists. Let vs notwithstanding, with best fauour and aduan­tage vnto himselfe that is possible, thus fashion for him his confused Chaos of dispute, into some shape of likely reason. Thus happily he may most fairely argue. If some Cordialls are necessary in all diseases, and Aurum potabile containe in it selfe the vse and vertue of all Cordialls, then is it an vniuersall medicine in all diseases. But some Cordialls are necessary in all diseases, Ergo, Aurum potabile is an vniuersall medicine.

We will grant that some Cordialls are necessary in all dis­eases in respect of the due care of natures preseruation, but we will deny that all Cordialls are necessary in all diseases, or for all different vses, or for all seasons in any disease. We deny also that Aurum potabile is any such Cordiall wherein is comprehended the vertue and power of all Cordialls. These points remaine still to bee proued as at the first beginning. Vntill therefore the Apologist haue first manifestly proued them, we doe aske the good behauiour against this trifling and brabling intrusion vpon a common and vniuersall right, for which he hetherto hath not, or euer can shew any good e­vidence. It fitteth not a man reputed learned, so oft to affirme that he doth not demonstrate, nor so oft to iterate and incul­cate that thing, which irresistibly and inuincibly he hath not cleerely founded vpon scientificall grounds. He that is here­in defectiue, is no better then a babler, a pratler, a tatler, Ho­mo in verba proiectus locutuleius blattero, saith Gellius, Noct. Attic lib. 1. It is not the sound of words (saith the same Au­thor in the same place) it is not the sound of words, but the profundirie of the sententious, and pithie thought, that is true science and learning, Non sonns habitus (que) vocis, sed sen­tentiarum penitiùs conceptarum altitudo. And this vndoub­tedly of your whole Apologie, aswell as of this your fourth [Page 26] Argumentation is most true: It is full of great words & bub­ling seeming reasons, but it is seasoned with little true and sound reason. As therefore Catullus saith of Quintia,

Nulla in tam magno est corpore mica salis.
No eye can spie in that bulks space
One iot of sweet or comely grace.

So may I iustly conclude of your grand Apology. If you doe haply like my owne poetrie rather then that is borrowed, I may thus truely say of your whole worke,

Verborum ingentem cumulum miramur, & vs (que)
Verbosum verbis nil nisi verba dare.
We view a wordy world of chatter,
All words, no word vnto the matter.

The fift Reason.

Aurum potabile, saith our disputant, doth open obstructi­ons, which are the causes of infinite diseases. From this pro­position he imagineth the conclusion must issue irresistibly, Ergo, Aurum potabile is an vniuersall medicine. If our boun­tie should extend to grant all, it proueth no more vniuersali­tie in Aurum potabile then is vsuall vnto other deoppilatiues or openers of obstructions. But hereto hee doth promptly reply, that there are no other deoppilatiues, either so effectu­all as this, or so permanent or certaine in their effects, or so little disquieting nature in their operations, or after their vse leauing behind them so small euill relique, or remaining in­conuenience, nor that are so easie or pleasant to take. Our ex­perience of your perpetuall want and insufficiencie in euery proofe or reason of your assertions, confidently by you not­withstanding promised in the former part of the Treatise, and as yet in nothing performed, doth warrant vs to deny vnto you common credit, vntill you haue, or can by some merit exceeding all exception, vanquish & extort our discreet be­leefe. Your partiall proiects or reports of your owne expe­rience, we knowe not to be inuiolate decrees. I haue oft seene [Page 27] long continuations, and knotty obstructions with as much pleasure and expedition (as any patient can hope or thinke) enodate and dissolued. They haue neuer againe returned, nor the remedies in that worke imploied, beene stained with the least suspition of either mixing with the cure, or leauing after the cure the least doubt or questioned imputation. Concer­ning the pleasure and facilitie in their taking, there was neuer quarrell heard, & the sound of praise hath oft awaked envy, and after driuen her with furie into an Apoplecticke amazed silence. For this therefore your felonie and robbing of al men and medicines of their vndoubted rights, your deserued su­spension in euery sound iudgement, cannot bee auoided, ex­cept you can read like a Clarke, farre better then hetherto it seemeth you haue done. Read then the histories of all times and ages past, wherein Aurum potabile being vnknowne, ex­cellent counsells haue produced admirable cures in al kindes of diseases. Read any practiser of note or celebritie in any age, or time, and you shall therein read (if you can read with iudgement) your owne iniurious insolence and vnrighteous presumption. But (say you) there is an inexplicable divinitie in the temper that giueth vnto Autum potabile, the incompa­rable preheminence. If this be true, then first soundly refute the former confutation thereof, and next salue the present contradiction of your selfe, in your professed practise. As you doe affirme in this place concerning Lullius his custome, so doe you in your testimonies, and elsewhere acknowledge concerning your owne, that you mixe your Aurum potabile sometimes with Cichory water, sometime with wine. If your Aurum potabile be in it selfe sufficient both to coole & heat, (as elsewhere you affirme) what vse then is there of Cichory water to coole, or of wine for warmth, or comfort? Either your owne action doth stab your assertion with the lye, or your assertion pronounceth your action needlesse or vaine. This is your true temper through euery veine and pulse of your former worke, namely to pronounce contraries, and yet [Page 28] affirme them to be all truths. And thus is your last reason detected, as your first, to be the liuely and perfect image, and picture of your most imperfect selfe, of whom I may truely say as Martiall of Thais,

Cum bene se tutam per fraudes mille putavit,
Omnia cum fecit, Thaida Thais olet.
Thais by wiles doth plot that she
(Though Thais) yet no Thais seeme to be.
When musk-like most perfumed she is,
All fumes orefumeth still Thais.

Through your secure triumph in so many your cunning couers, adulterate colours painted, adequate complexion & counterfeit guilt of golden temper, notwithstanding is per­fectly sented your fained worth by the proper ill sauour in it selfe. It remaineth now only and alone to consider your in­considerate proposing of an obiection against your selfe, and therein blindly leauing your selfe intangled. Aurum potabile (say you) page 11. latine Copie, being a Cordiall (for so now you confesse it in your lethargie of the former vniuersalitie) being properly a Cordiall (say you) how can it alone bee sufficient vnto the necessary euacuation of the superfluous or oppressing load of humors in the body. The immediat cō ­tinent & antecedent causes of diseases remaining within (say you again) health is scarcely, or not at all to be hoped mere­ly to follow vpō Cordials. Vpon the precedent grounds you conclude, that if the nature of the sick & of the vniuersal me­dicine be furthered & helped by some gentle purge, so much the rather & the sooner shall the naturall strength & the pro­pulsation of the disease succeed. Now let the Reader behold Anth. against Anth. In the very next words immediatly fol­lowing the former in the Latine copy thus he addeth. Not­withstanding (saith he) if this come not to passe .i. that the na­ture of the sick, & of the vniversall medicine, be not helped or furthered by purging in due consideration of reason, Nature wil finde a meanes, & way for her selfe better thē the Physiti­an, [Page 29] who is not Natures master, but Minister & helper. For the Physitian (saith he) in all diseases ought thither to direct all his evacuations, where nature doth regularly and critically in­tend them. How now will Anthony satisfie and answere An­thony? Anthony first said, that without purging or evacuati­on of the immediate continent and antecedent causes of disea­ses, (which is the proper, ordinarie, and vsuall office, skill, & direction of the Physitian) health could hardly, scarcely, or hopefully follow. Now lastly, Anthony againe saith, that Nature without the Physitian, will better finde helpe and meanes for her selfe. The cause of this difference betweene Anthony and himselfe, is the want of right distinction. That therefore I may mediate betweene his meaning and himselfe, I will thus helpe him to distinguish. Nature is to be consi­dered two wayes: The first way is as she worketh regularly, perfectly, or sufficiently, and there the Physitian is solely to imitate Nature, and to be directed by her, and her minister, & and no master. The second way is, as Nature irregularly, in­conveniently, or inperfectly worketh, and then and there must the Physitian be her directer, master, commander, and orde­rer. This may be manifestl [...] proued out of Hippocrates Aph. 20. 21. 22. lib. 1. If beside rule and reason, example & instance be demanded in way of illustration, we might be infinite here­in, but one or two are no lesse sufficient then a multitude. In the scorching flame, and furious fire of an exquisite peracute, or perperacute pleuresie, phrensie, Angina Peripuenmonia, Sy­nochus, and divers other like, if Nature demonstrate her selfe compleatly, and effectually able to vent sufficiently, or com­petently by any prompt or convenient naturall passage, the fierie smoake and fume of the boiling veines, menacing her suffocation, then is there no vse but an abuse in any vse of Physicke or Physitian. But if Nature in her strength funda­damentally quaile, by the oppression of her enemy, the dis­ease in the quantitie of the humor, and be beyond the ex­tent of her durance or toleration grieued, though the cordiall [Page 30] may flatter or ease for a miserable time, the Physitian must then either enable or helpe Nature, in her selfe helplesse, or she must perish remedilesse. This is vsually obserued, when ordinarily and ofr, the Physitian is manifestly seene to recall the yeelding ghost, against the before irresistible impedi­ments, and incumbrances of Nature in her selfe. Doth not the Physitian oft and vsually by giuing a vent solely vnto the blood & veines, as is before said, immediately thereby re­viue and reduce Nature, before this happie succour and sup­ply, eternally and vnrecouerably sinking? In these like cases, Nature hauing no power in her selfe, while the oppression & invincible burthen remaineth vpon her, the life or benefit of a­ny the most excellent Cordials, necessarily do perish with her. But let the Physitian lend his hand to remoue the oppressor, & the oppressed is often seene able either to raise & comfort it selfe, or at least to receiue comfort & refreshing from with­out, which before was offered in vaine vnto her, in her insus­ceptibilitie thereof. For this cause saith Galen, Mirum est quo­modo se abijcit Natura, cùm quod tentat, excludere nequeat. It is a wonder (saith he) how Nature is deiected, and how shee as it were despairing, casteth away all hope or care of her selfe, when being ouer-loaded beyond her strength, she at­tempteth by any kinde of evacuation, or excretion, to cast her burthen off, and cannot. Therc is no man so stupid, as to thinke that in these cases there is any hope in Cordials, since they cannot giue vnto Nature strength aboue her strength, and Nature to beare burthens importable, intollerable, and impossible vnto her. That vsually such burthens doe fall v­pon Nature, euery mans eye and daylie experience doth be­hold. And thus it is made manifest, how in many diseases, Nature absolutely must perish, and cannot subsist without the Physitians hand or helpe, by due evacuations to remoue her oppressions, which exceed the extent of her vtmost power and strength to endure, beare, or resist. Although therefore sometimes Nature is alone, and by her selfe, able [Page 31] perfectly to enodate her owne health and recouery. And al­though the Physitian, when Nature is not able of her selfe, doth and ought to helpe and assist her, by the imitation and direction of her owne course and custome in her owne regu­lar and perfect workes, yet simply, generally, absolutely, and without distinction to pronounce, that Nature is better able to helpe her selfe without the Physitian, is a palpable testi­monie of inconsideratnesse, confusion, and ignorance of vnder­standing. And this hath beene the common custome of the A­pologist, thorow the whole Apologie, in all parts and places thereof without difference or distinction, from a raw and vn­digested knowledge and learning, perpetually belching ex­treamely contraries. Now last of all, that he may make vp all his creeping, shifting, and starting holes and evasions, he d [...]w­beth vp with the vntempered morter of Raymundus Lullius, his learning and authoritie concerning Areanum Philoso­phicum, which he interpreteth to be an vniuersall medicine, & either the very same, or very like vnto his Aurum patabile, be­cause they are both (saith he) propagating gold, or propaga­ted from gold. We doubt not but as gold hath propagated your Aurum potabile, so in your owne good feeling & sense, your Aurum potabile doth propagate gold. Nay, we will grant it possible, that as into Aqua menstralis, it gently and slowly glideth, so it may happily runne backe againe amaine in solid substance, into the devouring Ocean of your purse. If we should freely grant thus much, yet will it propagate no direct eviction, that Areanum Philosophicum is your Aurum potabile, or vniuersall medicine, since you doe but guesse and coniecture at it, although you pronounce, as if your guesse were authority, or sufficient reason. The due praises which you inferre of Raymundus Lullius, beget in me no indignati­on. I will onely recite what a learned man with wittie gravi­tie in Poesie hath taxed, concerning his vnprofitable studies and labour in curiosities, and especially about the Philoso­phers stone;

[Page 32]
Dum lapidem quaris (Lulli) quem quaerere nulli
Profuit, haud Lullus, sed mihi nullus eris,
If Lully dully seeke that stone,
Which neuer could nor can be knowne;
Then no man needes must Lully be,
Since no man nothing seekes to see▪

How oft Anthony hath lost Anthony in his former Apo­logizing worke, perpetually tautologizing, sometimes con­tradicting and denying himselfe, sometimes in the cloudes & mistes of his owne inex plicate meaning, hiding himselfe euen from himselfe, and sometimes appearing contrarie and oppo­site vnto himselfe, and euer vnchangeablie changeable from himselfe, vnto the diligent and iudicious Reader, hath not beene obscure to obserue. I will now leaue him with his friend Lullius, for his better institution and instruction, and now taking my leaue, thus part with the first part of his A­pologie. I will onely in one Dislicke of my owne suddaine Muse, friendly warne him, that he is espied:

Dissimulas qui sis, dum nolis quem scis haberi.
Scimus at hoc, nec enim quem simules, simules.
Skil'd are you to
A man is properly saide to resemble that is not, & to dissemble that which is, as if it were not Simulamus esse que non sunt, inqu [...]t Ci­cero. Dissimula­mu [...] non esse quae sunt. Sic Virg. Dissimulare eti­am sperasti per­fide tantum Posse nefas?
resemble faire,
And to distemble that you are.
But you can not be, well we know,
Your selfe, and that you would seeme too.

CAP. III.

THus carried with a prosperous gale, and willing sail, we are at length arrived vpon the margin or skirts of your second part of the Apologie. In your very first entrance you complaine of the indocilitie and incredulitie of men, concerning your doctrine of the vniversall medicine. Al­though you haue (as you say) perswaded, yet can you not perswade. Certainely you perswade your sel [...]e of your selfe too well, and therefore of others so ill. See whether you can [Page 33] see no fault in your seife, and your owne perswasions in the first passed part of your Apologie. You shall there finde mee your friend to helpe you therein. As there, so in the second part you boast of reason and experience. Your reasons are short, as you confesse, as I will declare, and as all men may see. In your experiences (which really and indeed are rather other mens testimonies) you abound. So it befitteth him who wanteth true reason and iudgment, and buildeth vpon such inartificiall arguments, meerely arising from the fancies and sense of distressed patients, transported vsually by their affection, most seldome by reason and true judgment gui­ded. You tell vs, let the envious barke, and say that your gold is no gold: but this you say is more certaine, then that is most certaine, that a medicine an hundreth times more preci­ous then gold, is by you out of gold deduced. If your proofe heereof bee onely equall vnto that which formerly with the same titles and tearmes you haue exalted, and falsely dignified, it is lesse then nothing, since out of nothing cannot issue any thing. We will now attend how according to your promise, you doe proue your selfe master and maker of the genuine, true and no counterfeit Aurum potabile. Vnto this purpose you produce three reasons. The first is this, That me­dicine which is made of gold, dissolued without corrosiues in­to a substance or cōsistence, like hony potable, easily dissolued in any liquor, is the most excellent medicine liquor, & true vndoubted Aurum potabile. This is the Maior, the Minor fol­loweth. But (say you) my medicine is such, namely gold dissolued without Corrosiues, into a substance or consistence, like hony potable, easily dissolued in any liqor: Erg. my medicine is the true Aurum potabile. We deny your Minor, & expect it by you proved. In stead of thee expected proofe: you tell vs that you haue formerly demonstrated it in a former treatise, and referre vs thereto. In that treatise, according to my pro­mise in the beginning, I must remit you vnto those learned men, who haue there, and for that alreadie taken you into [Page 34] their handling. I will therefore onely make a serutinie and tru­tinie of those your reasons and proofes, which I doe find here. In your Minor you say, that your medicine is gold, dissolued without Corrosiues. This I do denie, and you cannot prooue it, except you make your concealed Aqua Menstrualis knowne, I will not credit you, but that there are Corrosiue vertues and powers therein. Except therefore you do make knowne that your grand secret, your totum scire, & secretum, your argument and proofe is for all hope of progresse, lost and drowned in your Aqua Menstrualis. And there we leaue your first proofe, cowardly hiding it selfe. I need not tell you, that Aurum potabile, per aquam fortem, per fraudem com­positum, solutum aquis regijs, is reproued & damned of Chy­micks themselues. That that Aurum potabile, which is debite modo & comprobato sapientibus, is knowne vnto you, you doe not make knowne vnto vs, but leaue it obscured and sunke in the puddle of your menstruall water. We come vnto your se­cond proofe, by which you would convince, that your vni­versall medicine is the true Aurum potabile. The medicine, say you, which haue the genuine, proper, and inseparable effects of Aurum potabile, is to be taken and esteemed the same. But your vniversall medicine hath those vniversal and solely pro­per effects of Aurum potabile, Ergo it is the same. We denie not your Maior from the immediate and proper effects, vnto the true immediate cause, the sequele is most certaine and ne­cessary. Your Minor we doubt and thinke false, and therfore we vrge and require your proofe and manifestation thereof. But you homely and plainely tell vs, that your medicine hath giuen and yeelded sufficient evidences, testimonies, and ef­fects, only worthie Aurum potabile. And thus except we will take your bare word and credit therein, or stay for further proofe out of your succeeding testimonies, the promised pre­sent proofe is not performed. Your third proofe is taken out of the admirable and wonderfull manner, falling out in the workmanship of your Aurum potabile, that is, the permanent [Page 35] and perfect dissolution thereof, the ascent in an exceeding red shape or forme by the Alembike. When wee haue seene the Gold in solid substance first put into the Alembike, and after without fraud closed therein; lastly, ascending in the mentio­ned forme, and withall doe know your Aqua menstrualis, we are then Chrysopaeidare possunt alijs me­tallis qualitates accidentarias auri veri, colo­rem, duritiem, pondus &c. Es­sentiales non pos­sunt, nempe cra­sim, formam, pro­prietates Riolan. and not before, in any reason or equitie, tyed to take your report in your owne cause. Thus you see how you per­swade your selfe too well of your selfe. You thinke better of your credit then it is, and trusting thereto ouermuch, your last proofe is as the first and second, voide and annihilate. But you reply, that you haue many learned Physitians, eye-witnesses of this your experience. We answere and oppose your owne confession, viz. that your Aqua menstrualis is knowne vnto no man. If no man know it but your selfe, then no man but your selfe can satisfie vs, whether there be therein any corro­siue power or vertue, and (as we said before) we are resolued not to credit you. Therefore your last proofe or argument is dissolued, and with the former voide. Thus haue you by force and argument gained nothing. Let vs now familiarly, yet se­riously, conferre together. Suppose we should yeeld vnto you the honour of possessing, and the prerogatiue of the first in­venting and finding out of Aurum potabile. You cannot ther­by proue your selfe more generally learned, or more truely honest, both which, are more chiefly and mainely required in euery man, in euery facultie. Generall learning or knowledge consisteth not in any one particular alone. As for honestie, your presumption is the vnlimited, and so vniversall mono­polie of your medicine, not vsually tolerated or allowed in a common-weale, and your reserued & concealed privat gaine therein, doe minister iust occasion and matter to Si medicus pa­ret remedia do­misuae, exigat si placet [...] centum aut mille aureos [...] quis precio sta­tuet modū? Ri [...]. suspect you. In your third proofe, you seeme to praise your selfe by the way of answere to an obiection, for your communicating vnto many, so excellent a medicine, that should not be made (say you) so common. And you say, that like the sunne it is nothing lesse precious, because the shining glorie & brightnes [Page 36] is communicated vnto all. It is true indeed, your Aurum pota­bile is nothing lesse precious for the communication, but it may be happily lesse communicabie for the price. I would thinke your comparison not to hold in the sunne so fitly, as in the moone, since your communication is nothing so cleare, nothing so free or bright, but dimme and clouded in much darknes. You shine not but in part, nor fully; the beames of aqua menstrualis altogether eclipsed. Neither doe you shine gratis. Deale plainely and vprightly. If your communication thereof be honest, without extortion therein, without rob­bing and spoyle, without deceit, ingeniously, apertly, freely communicate the whole preparation, that other men Magistratus in publicum consu­lit, ut sciatur quae medicamenta praescribunt Me­dici, ut publice fiant & exami­nentur. Libavius in Giammanū. may know aswell as your selfe, what errors and abuses there are hidden secret in that reserued watrish and menstruall orbe or aspect. It is not sufficient for you to say, that you haue by the grace and gift of God obtained the secret of secrets, the soie Iewell of Art and Nature, but other men must know that you came truely and honestly vnto it; as also, that ho­nestly and truely you vse it. Otherwise there ought no more thereof remaine with you, but the punishment of your fault and sinne therein. Learne of Esops cock, he found a Gemme, you know where, and you know how. Dum vertit stercorae­rium offendit gemmam, saith the fable. He stirred vp the muck­hill, and found a gemme. It added nothing vnto his worth, yet he shewed a more honest affection then you, he made no pro­fit of his good hap, he wished it freely vnto the Gold-smith. You crow lowder, and make more cackle, but you are no­thing so ingenuous. You sell the grace and gifts, which you say, God hath giuen vnto you, & after such a rate & propor­tion, as no man knoweth but your selfe. And thus indeed you communicate it vnto euery man, but the truly golden sup or sap therein, no man tasteth but your selfe. Thus farre we haue launched into the depth, & haue sounded & fadomed the pro­fundity of your proofes, both in the 1 and 2 part of your A­pologie. We will now cast anchore a while, & prepare and re­paire [Page 37] our tackle, that with prosprous winds, & fresh gales, we may also giue a new charge vpon your testimonies. As you formerly in your reasons & arguments, professed your selfe a Champion of truth; and it hath solely proued a guilefull sha­dow of truth, seruing only vnto your commodity & benefit. So in the preface vnto your testimonies also you now pro­mise that you will publish no letter or testimonies vnto any mans disgrace; but how false and dissembling your prom [...]se and purpose is herein, let all men iudge, who may manifestly behold how iniuriously and scandalously many of your testi­monies make a footstoole and ladder of other mens names & depraued worth, that thereby your golden medicine may clime vnto the vsurped top and height of supremacy. It is a wonder how so sodainely you are start vp so learned, so fa­mous, so brauingly audacious, since (as it is well vnderstood) not not many yeares since dispairing of thriuing by your learning, you became a Traffiquer, or trader in woolls, or cloath, a long time together. Is it possible that you can so swiftly lay aside your Mechanicke thoughts, and so prowd­ly and daringly, not only encounter, but triumph vpon lear­ned men, your selfe so late so obscure and despicate in your owne eyes? I will not say with the Poet, Quid Domini faci­ent? But good S r tell me;

What shall your grand Theophrasts doe,
If wooll packs coniure thus in you?

The insolence is vnmeasurable in so meane a Philosopher, as you haue proued your selfe, and therefore iust indignation doth afford you no better nor other answere but this con­tempt.

CAP. IIII.

WE are now come to buckle with your testimo­nies. First, I will make manifest that they are all in generall of no validitie, to proue the worthi­nesse [Page 38] of authorization in your Aurum potabile. Secondly, I will proue and manifest that some of your testimonies are knowne vnto my sel [...]e to be false, and other some in all possi­ble reason apertly impossible. Thirdly, I will produce testi­monies concerning other medicines in their worth and suc­cesse, nothing inferiour to your testimonies of Aurum pota­bile, and for the most part in the same kindes. Lastly, I will oppose vnto your testimonies blazed in honour of Aurum potabile, such counter-testimonies, as shall sound as much in dishonour. First, for the invaliditie in generall of your testi­monies, and iointly they are all defectiue in one of these two kindes. Some are directly false. All the rest witnesse no more but the felicitie, good successe, and happy issues and euents of your medicine, which is no sufficient or compleat satisfacti­on for the authoritie, lawfulnesse, or allowance of your medi­cine. Many diseases haue beene by sleight meanes prudently guided, admirably cured. Many diseases likewise haue beene cured by chance, when all humane helpe hath vtterly beene dispaired. I did my selfe knowe a Gentleman cured of a long and Cronicall head-ake and giddinesse, by a rude blowe with a staffe vpon his head, plentifully causing him to bleed, with great danger of his life. I knewe another by taking ratsbane vnwillingly from a poysner, dispatched of an inueterate and incurable french poxe, many yeares before setled in his bones all vsefull helpe in that kinde wearied, and a long time made frustrate. I haue read an history of a woman, who being wea­ried with her husbands▪ long and chargeable sicknesse (think­ing therby to dispatch him of his misery) gaue him the pow­der of a Toad, whereby he was presently recouered. I doe read of another woman in whom the dropsie had ouergrown the reuocation thereof by any ordinary course, at length she chanced from an high place to fall, and hitting her belly vpon a sharpe stone, it made way and passage for the hidropicall water, and the woman was thereby deliuered. These good issues or euents, doe not commend these medicines, or their [Page 39] vse, nor for that cause can giue them a supremacy or princi­palitie aboue all others. Neither can the multitude of testi­monies, or reports of their admirable successe iustifie their prescriptions. If the testimonies of good euents, or issues were sufficient, the hardie Empericke, the Magitian, and Im­postor would proue the most excellent Phisitians, who in all ages haue abounded, the one with wonderous, the other with supernaturall and miraculous successes. Concerning the one I haue knowne my selfe (and it is not difficult at this day to produce innumerable knowne witnesses of the best worth & estimation, both in Northampton shire, and in other Coun­tries) I haue knowne diuers practisers in this kinde, who with certaine secret words, crossed Napl [...]ns, & the like, haue oft and vsually found good successe in desperate diseases, when Art hath giuen place, or could not preuaile. Concer­ning the multitude of testimonies, touching good issues in im­postures, and deceitfull curations, in regard both of the ho­nour and eminence of personages, it would bee tedious and scandalous to write. Reginald Scot doth fulfill more then measure in this kinde in his discouery. How easie it is also to gaine fame and a high name among vulgars, let Tobacco vaunt and boast it selfe. In his first arriuall into this king­dome, there was scarce one mouth which did not open in his praise, & all diseases did quake at his feareful rumour, whiles it menaced their generall ruine and exile from men. The dis­eases which it was then said to haue cured, were infinite, and administred admirable matter of laughter in this kinde. Our late Welling borroughe well had in a short time gained for every drop thereof almost a flood of praises. No man depar­ted from thence vncured. Aurum potabile doth now play the same descant at an higher rate, but cannot straine vnto an higher note, then the harmonious applause and noise of that wells praise as long as the musicke lasted. I might abound in many more, and in more then too many examples in these kindes. These sodaine glorious puffes of praises howsoeuer [Page 40] in men full of wonder & easily blasted with admiration they obtaine a violent obsession of their vulgar opinions, wise men are more slowly surprised with such rash incursions of vaine credulitie and selfe conceit. These considerations well weighed how can you expect to [...]aue your vniuersall medi­cine esteemed worthy authorization or to bee pure and vn­counterfeit merely in respect of his fame, spreading renowne, and common voice, or in regard of the glorious ostentation of happy add succesfull issues alone amongst men, who know not, nor can acknowledge, or take notice of the reason, work­manship, and composition thereof, and thence assure them­selues of the due and right accommodation. No truly adui­sed Phisitian can thinke either the credit of testimonies in the succesfull events, or another mans experience and informati­on equall or equiualent vnto his owne knowledge, since eue­ry iudicious Physitian for his owne iustification in all his vp­right actions, ought in himselfe, and not in another, to knowe the temper and constitution of all things, which he shall law­fully apply or vse; and to examine seriously and duly, how it consenteth first generally with allowance of reason, and also is proportioned to his particular. Thus euery honest and vp­right Artist is bound, and will be ready to giue account of all his actions in euery circumstance, and in each particular. It is not the good issue or euent of a medicine, that doth or can alone commend a Phisitian, but his owne precise know­ledge of the anatomie thereof, guided and gouerned by rule and likely reason vnto the likely issue. He is an Idiot or foole that meerely iudgeth by euents. That Phisitian therefore doth not answere his dutie and required worth, who led like a blinde ignorant by the opinion of another man, and not knowing himselfe the nature and qualitie of a medicine, doth traditionally at a second hand, and vpon anothers commen­dation prescribe it. He that applaudeth himselfe herein, how­soeuer in his owne golden opinion, prowd of a gay new knowledge, he supposeth that he out-strippeth other meaner [Page 41] wits, and howsoeuer with glittering shadowes he may for a time amaze vniudging men, yet vnto him, who is substanti­ally and truly wise, and can discerne the miraculous illusions, which rash lightnesse is able to worke in common braines, he shall cleerely appeare through a faire superficiall shew with­out, a substantiall foole within. How can you then alone, a­boue, or beyound reason, challenge a prerogatiue of impo­sing your Aurum vpon other Phisitians, or how can you iustl [...] blame them if they be wary in trusting it, while vn­knowne vnto them? If you haue obtained such a secret, you that knowe it, may knowingly vse it, they that knowe it not, may be iustly doubtfull; since where is not knowledge must and ought be doubt If therefore you will ingeniously make your secret knowne, then they that knowe it with you, may iudiciously vse it, and iustifie it with you. If you will keepe it niggardly vnto your selfe, or dare not shew it, as therein only holding your priu [...]te or monoplized gaine for your owne base commoditie, then enioy it your selfe, and vnder­standing it your selfe, commend it your selfe, but arrogate there in not too much to your selfe, nor derogate in the pride of one instrument from the whole excellency of all good workmanship, as if all art were now lately coniured w [...]thin the circuit of Aurum potabile. Knowe God your selfe and othe [...]s as wel as your selfe, yea to be not only in many things equall, but better then your selfe; though in this one thing haply you had or could euidently proue your deseruing be­yond the ordinary measure of all desert. Looke not to build your owne true worth vpon others testimonies of your me­dicine. There are other more true testimonies and vndoub­ted euidences of true worth, then are to be seene in the excel­lencies of a dead instrument; the true liuelyhood and perfe­ction whereof, consisteth in the prudence, guidance, and go­vernment of the learned Phisitian. Your vniuersall and gene­rall medicine, can be but a materiall and sublunary body: but the discreet and artificiall accommodation thereof, is a spiri­tuall [Page 42] vertue, and power of the soule. In the better part there­of all other Phisitians participate with you, yea you cannot deny that many exceed you. How dare you then so much a­dore and worship a senselesse and earthly instrument, as in the ouerflowing praise thereof, to drowne the true praises, which God aboue and beyond it hath g uen to his owne gifts graces and heauenly endowments of true science, pru­dence, sagacity, and iudgement, which hee hath ordained to rule, guid, order, and dispose the right dispensation of all such outward meanes, and instruments of what excellency soeuer. Contract then your swelling pride in so small a merit. Let it not so ranckly ouerflowe the banks of modesty and reason. I see among your testimonies the names of some honorable, and worthy personages, and I may, and doe iustly suspect, that many of their priuate letters are published without their consent and priuitie. I there meet also the names of diuers mē of eminent learning and wisdome; and therefore it doth in­duce me to perswade my selfe that you haue beene ouerbold to subscribe them, when I compare with their worth & gra­vitie, your intolerable ridiculous arrogancie in an vnknowne fabrication, which when knowne (for ought is as is yet knowne) may hereafter proue a trifle, if not worse. I doe not say so, but if it be so, trust not too much vnto praises, which consist in others gift and prodigalitie, but in true vertue, standing by it selfe. I doubt it not, nor thinke it impossible, that some of your inserted letters are permitted by the Au­thors in dirision of your boundlesse insolency, if with their allowance printed.

Vt qui conducti plorant in funere dicunt
Et faciunt prope plura dolentibus ex animo, sic Horac.
Derisor vero plus laudatore moretur.
As he that hired is to mourne
To counterfeit a true forlorne,
Doth showre more teares and sigh more deepe,
Then he whose breast doth inly weepe.
[Page 43]
So a close scorne swells most of all
In praises Hyperbolicall.

Let me then conclude, if your vniuersall medicine had trauel­led through as many guts, as M r Coriats shooes haue tram­pled Countries, it could not returne laded with more See the Od­combian ban­quet. wor­thie praises, nor more praises of worthies. Your merits are equall, and therefore your praises may well be equalled. He and only he with one paire of shooes, or santals (a peerelesse paire and neuer pared) hath troden out the vnpaced spaces of this worlds vniuerse. You, and you alone, with one alone me­dicine, yea, with one alone, and one your owne, doe cure all the wide worlds maladies. As therefore the Poet doth deter­mine betweene the two Sheepheards, contending for the waged heiffer; so may we iustly say, or rather sing, concer­ning your freind Odcombe, and your selfe,

Ʋitulâ tu dignus & hic.
You both deserue nor part, nor halfe,
But each apart to haue the calfe.

Is it possible so many Worthies (if not in iest) should with such amazed wonderment spend so many immoderate pray­ses in a matter out of the element of their owne skill, onely vpon good successes, or issues by your selfe conceaued, with­out true knowledge of the cause or reason, which onely dis­cerneth and putteth iust difference betweene an apparant good, and an appearing only? We can not thinke so vnwor­thily of men so worthy. We may rather with good manners impute it vnto your owne well knowne vaine glorious cor­rupting, or straining of their facility.

CAP. V.

THus much in generall, concerning the defection of all your testimonies for the proofe of worthinesse in your Aurum potabile, to be authorized, allowed, and [Page 44] approued. Now I descend from the insufficiency of all vnto the falshood of some. I will beginne with that trinity of let­ters first marching in the Apologie the three first domesticall testimonies. The maine end and scope in them is the praise of Aurum potabile, vnto whose worship is sacrificed D r C. his vniust slaunder and reproach. The partiall arrogating vnto the one, and iniurious derogating from the other. I will now make euident for the honour and vendication of truth. I will not, according vnto the Apologist his example, [...]e ouer busie to entermeddle with men, and matters out of my own know­ledge, nor rashly and inconsiderat [...]ly to p ecipitate my selfe into particular quarrels, the subiect, the circumstance, the oc­casion, and persons vnknowne, as in the three first domestick testimonies he hath done. I doe therefore omit all other testi­monies, and will only vndertake those, whose authors and matter is knowne vnto my selfe, by the errours and mistaking therein detected, displaying the likelyhood, contingence, and possibility of the same defects, and insufficiency in many, if not in most, or all the rest.

The first domesticall testimony is this.

Worthy and learned friend, I write vnto you later then I intended, because I thought it not fit to deliuer my opinion before manifold experience made in a matter of such worth and consequence. Experimentum fallax, as our Master Hipo­crates teacheth. But now I will briefly shew you the vertue and excellency of your medicine.

The second triall that I made thereof, was vpon a very worshipfull Gentleman S r William Samwell knight. He had a burning feaver with great violence of continuall heat, so that he vtterly lost all sleep. He had withall a weaknesse in his kidneyes, and could not make water. Sundry Glisters were administred vnto him, Purgations, vomits, and hee was also let bloud, all which, in my obseruation, were so farre from gi­ving [Page 45] him any ease, that the disease did still growe stronger, and all the Symptomes, or accidents euery day worse and worse and more grieuous. I perswaded the giuing of your medicine. But at the first I could not obtaine that he should take a new and vnknowne thing. At last by the importunity of his friends, and the necessity of his disease still increasing, he yeelded and tooke it. In an instant almost hee felt a gentle remission of his heat and a milde cooling, his spirit comfor­ted, his kidneyes strengthned, so that he made water in a rea­sonable good quantity. Since which time he neuer ceased to extoll this medicine, though introth, hauing beene long affli­cted with a most violent disease, hee hath not as yet fully re­covered his strength.

Your louing friend Iohn Markes.

The refutation of the first domesti­call testimonie.

THe disease of the Gent. concerning whom, the contro­versie in these testimonies doth arise, is here described to be a burning seaver. The remedies likewise vsed by D r Co. are set downe to haue beene purging, bleeding, vomiting; vn­to both these both parts apart, agree and acknowledge the report true. The difference is, whether the chiefe desert and worth in that vnperfect cure which followed, is truely and properly to bee giuen and granted vnto the fore-mentioned remedies, or vnto Aurum p [...]tabile comming after; or rather vnseasonably interrupting them. The author of this testimony telleth vs, that the first remedies, namely purging, bleeding, vomiting, were so farre from giuing ease, that the disease and accidents grew worse. After the taking of Aurum potabile, there was a remission of paine, the spirits were comforted, [Page 46] parts oppressed relieued. From hence we may easily collect his opinion, viz. that Aurum potabile deserued before the o­ther remedies, the praise and preheminence. D r Co. hath, and doth oppose it. The maine argument in the behalfe of Aurum potabile (as you may here see) is the patients ease and refre­shing, without any perfect recouery or cure, as witnesseth the Author himselfe of this testimony. The argument in the be­halfe of the other named remedies of purging, bleeding, Vomitio prae­cordiorum im­puritatem, super­vacuos humores in ventriculi ca­paci [...]ate, & tu­nicis haerentis, à cava iecoris & lienis, & ex pan­cria synceros eli­cit, quo splerunq. nec a hiera, nec aliud vehemen­tissimum medi­camentum ex­turbare potest. Fernei de Meth. Med. lib. 3 ca. 3. Hyppocrai. Aph. 17. lib 4. Aph. 18. lib. 4. Gal. in lib. 1. Hypp. de Morb. vul [...]ar▪ sect. 55. 56. vo­miting, is reason, and the euer-knowne propertie, ordinary custome, nature, and infallible proofe and experience of their vsuall necessity and manifest benefit in all burning Febrium ar­dentium incen­dia servore ve­hementem ex tinguit, accelerat vene sectio. In­teriores instam­mat [...]ones idem auxilii genus i­nitio radicitùs eruit. Fern [...]l de Meth. Med l. 2. c. 13. Gal de cu­ratione per ve­nae sectionem, 18. 20. 7. sect. 11 19, De Meth. Med. l. 11. se. 15. feavers, in all inward inflammations of back, kidneyes here mentio­ned, as also all other parts. Now marke M r Markes his Lo­gick. After bleeding and purging, the disease and accidents grow worse. After Aurum potabile, they were presently miti­gated. Ergo the first remedies did no good, and the last reme­die did the good. Stay your gallop (swift-witted Sir) pause and know that ease and goodnes are seldome necessary com­panions. Paine is sometimes more truely profitable, though more seldome welcome, It falleth out in diuers cases and re­spects, the better the worse, & the worse the better. As in true parsimonie, cost is sometimes better spent then spared; so in many diseases paine & anxietie is better borne then forborne. Obserue your own argument once againe. After Aurū pota­bile, the disease and accidents were mitigated; after purga­tion and phlebotomie, they grew worse. Ergo, Aurum po­tabile did good, phlebotomie and purgation did no good. In like manner you may thus reason. My Stomacke is sicke after meat, and good nourishment, and best when fasting, therefore fasting doth good, and good nourishment doth no good. In the same kinde is this reasoning. A good conscience is oft sick and troubled, an ill conscience is oft, or for the most part, merry, and without trouble. Ergo a good c [...]nscience doth no good, and an ill conscience doth good. As in the first you shall proue an euill Physitian thus reasoning, so in the o­ther [Page 47] an impious and vngodly diuine. Are these things won­ders vnto you? Doe you not know that there is a growing better vnto sense, which is growing worse in reason? Doth not a good in one kinde, prognosticat an euill in another? Are you ignorant of a false-seeming, momentanie, vncertaine, and vaine good? Is a languishing, and a long continued disease & danger, flattered with palliation, momentanie refreshings, & ease, good? Is the paine, patience, labor and anxietie that pur­chafeth perfect health and deliuerance there-from, euill? In the weaknes of your argument, you may see a manifest argu­ment of weaknes in your selfe; The weaknes both of your ar­gument and yourselfe, learne then by this argument follow­ing, against which, in the iudgment of the learned, you shall not be able to answere one word, one syllable, [...].

Whosoeuer doth draw a reason or proofe of goodnes in remedies from their prospering successe alone, or doth draw a reason or proofe of their illnes and vnfitnes, from their want of fortunate events or operation, he is in himselfe and in his reason, weake and ignorant. But M r Markes doth draw a reason or proofe of goodnes in Aurum potabile, from the pro­spering successe alone: and doth also draw a reason of the ill­nes and vnfitnes of Phlebotomie and purgation, from their want of fortunate events or operation. Ergo M r Markes in this testimony, is both in his reason and in himselfe, weake and ignorant.

The Maior is Hyppocrates Aph. 27. lib. 2. His quae sine cer­ta ratione, deprehensaque causa levant, acquiescendum non est, neque vereri admodum deijs, qua abs reprava apparent. Horum enim plurae sunt instabilia.

The Minor is manifest in the testimony it selfe vnto any that readeth it. The conclusion cannot be denyed in any rule or reason. Conclusiones negari non oportet. In this Syllogisti­call, and Scholasticall complete armor doth M r Markes com­pell vs to oppose, while he will needs make proofe of his wits vpon vs poore Physitians, and so brauely challenge vs at our [Page 48] owne weapons. Behold notwithstanding the profound rea­son, whereupon he beareth himselfe so loftie and confidently, in the end jadeth, and here leaueth his Masters lame learning in the mire. As I haue here manifested M r Markes his reason vaine and weake, by which he would extoll Aurum potabile, and depresse the praise and worth of the other remedies, so will I next proue manifestly and briefly, that he himselfe and his Aurum potabile, were ignorant and iniurious vnto the pa­tient, in intetrupting, and causing to be discontinued so ab­ruptly, purgation and Phlebotomie, howsoeuer after their vse, the disease and accidents grew worse.

I dare not encounter so learned a Clarke without a Syllo­gisme, thus then I reason. In euery disease where the same reason and cause doth remaine the same, of the continuance of the same remedies, there those remedies ought not to bee discontinued, howsoeuer after their vse, the disease and acci­dents grow worse.

But in the fore-mentioned disease of the named Gent. in in this testimony, the same reason and cause did still remaine the same of phlebotomie and purgation: Ergo phlebotomie and purgation ought not to haue been discontinued, although the disease and accidents grew worse. The Maior is Hyppo­crates 52. Aph lib. 2. Omnia facienti secundùm rationem, licet non succedat secundùm rationem, non ideo desistendum est, dum­modo manet quod à principio visum est.

The Minor is M r Parsons of Sayton, who in his Epistle to the Apo [...]ogie, saith, Neque per Purgationes, Clysteres, Vomi­tum, sanguinis missionem, incendium mitigare potuit. Morbus indies ingravescebat▪ that is, the burning heate, the flame or inward inflammation was nothing cooled, but the disease, (which he himselfe confesseth a burning feaver) and his acci­dents, grew worse and worse, which are manifest causes and reasons, indicating both Purgation and Phlebotomie. Thus the Minor appeareth to be the Parson his owne, and the Ma­ior his great Masters, for so forsooth he professeth Hyppocra­tes [Page 49] in the English Copie of this testimonie. As he cannot for shame denie himselfe in the one, so can he not be so perfidious in the other, as to deny his Master. The conclusion therefore doth stand inviolat and infallible. The Syllogisme is legall & regular in the second figure, and couched in Camestres. I doe now therefore boldly proclaime and divulge with authority, reason, rule, and manifest proofe, that M r Markes in this te­stimonie is an ignorant vndertaker, that his insinuation into the Patient by Aurum potabile (howsoeuer pleasing his ease) was iniurious and vnseasonable, that the generall remedies before-mentioned and administred by D. Co. (howsoeuer by the Parson sleighted and vilified) were in art and reason more proper, pertinent and materiall vnto the Patients health and recoverie, if vntimely they had not by Aurum potabile, and by M r Markes his vnlearned intrusion, beene discontinued. Here haply the Parson will obiect: If there were so manifest a reason of iterated phlebotomie and purgation, why did D r C. omit when he did phlebotomize and purge, to doe it vnto a more sufficient module and measure? Why did not he thereby prevent the vse of such iteration in his administration thereof? Vnderstand (worthy Reader) that M r Markes had purged and let blood the Patient before D. Co. came vn­to him, and was also gone from him. The quantities which he had evacuated in either kinde, being vnto D r Co. vnknowne, discretion imposed a caution vpon him, to per­forme that which remained, rather vnder then ouer compe­tence. The reformation of this safe & needful error, afterward the immediat abrupt succeeding of Aurū potabile did furious­ly kick at, & reiect. How necessary it was at that time to haue bene done againe, is before proued, & the truth therof is con­firmed by the following imperfect Crisis, through the defect thereof, & by the plentifull decumbence of humors, & painful swellings of the nether parts (wherof is neither want nor ob­scurity of witnesses) as also by the patients long continuance languishingly sicke the space of halfe an yeare together, not­withstanding, [Page 50] the faire ease and pleasure done by Aurum po­tabile. His languishing so long is euident, reckning from D r C. his departure from the patient in March going before, vn­to the date of this testimony September 10. after which time he was not as yet fully recouered saith this testimonie. The Parson may haply as yet obiect farther. The strength of na­ture was not able to beare or indure the iteration of the for­mer remedies when Aurum potabile came with his succor and refreshing. The contrary hereto did offer it selfe vnto euery vulgar and common eye. For it is vndoubted in common sense and reason, that the same ability which was sufficient to endure that expressed tedious & painefull length of a lan­guishing sicknesse, by the vnperfect Crisis arising from the imperfect euacuations, and of the dangerous decumbence of humours, perpetually vexing and launcing the neather parts with perpetuall feare and doubt, It is vndoubted (I say) that this strength might haue better indured a moderate evacua­tion in short time done with facility, and without difficultie, or danger. The likely good reason and vse of such evacuati­ons, the words of this testimony doe offer apparent, that is a burning feauer, continuall estuation, burning, boyling, all want of rest and sleepe in the Gentleman; inward flame, or inflammation by these words in the Latine copie expressed, Ardens febris, Aestus continuus, flagratio, incendium. Vnto these we might adde (though not here mentioned) a pletho­ricall body, vrine red intense, thicke, troubled. As these were manifest reasons & causes, mouing, and vrging phlebotomie and purgation, so that these still remained the same after their second vse, besides their first knowne moderation, and small quantitie, it is euident by these words in the first testimonie before mentioned, Ne (que) per Clisteres, Vomitum, Purgationem, sanguinis missionem, quae omnia tentata sunt, incendium mitiga­ri potuit, that is, Notwithstanding purging, vomiting, blee­ding (saith M. Markes) the heat, the flame or burning, could not be quenched. It may here haply be obiected and imagi­ned [Page 51] that without Aurum potabile giuing strength and refre­shing, the patient could not haue endured either the langui­shing long sicknesse (as he did) nor the iteration of any the former generall remedies, if they had beene continued. If this be granted, yet doth it not excuse his fowle errour and igno­rance, who because Aurum potabile did giue this comfort & abilitie, therefore he perversly and ignorantly reiected other remedies, no lesse necessary in other kinds, as was this in that. Neither is it to be doubted that if Aurum potabile were able to inable nature, to indure the terrour and torment of the fore mentioned languishing sicknesse, but that in reason o­ther remedies of the same kinde, and of the same created vse, might haue done the same, howsoeuer at this time, and in this particular Aurum potabile alone hapned to be acceptable, & therefore had the oportunity solely vnto it self. It may haply yet be further enquired what manifest indication there was of vomit before mentioned. I need not giue thereof any o­ther reason, then that inseparable accident or symptome of a burning feauer; namely the excessiue ebullition of putrified choler abounding in the stomacke and liuer, which was in this patient manifest, accompanied with that stoppage of the backe and kidneyes, by the Parson witnessed, which did indi­cate that revulsion and deriuation, which vsually and mani­festly vomit doth performe. The Parson will haply as yet reply. If phlebotomie and purgation were so needfull to bee againe iterated, why did not the other learned, and worthie succeeding Doctors insist in that course? The answer is two­fold. First I doe by my owne proofe and experience knowe, that the hope of their preualence therein against Aurum po­tabile, and his preiudicate anticipation, was impossible. Se­condly, I knowe it manifest, and out of doubt, that the deci­dence from the sharpnesse of the disease, and the setling of humours, and their decumbence into the neather parts, or at least their irreuocable entrance into the way of decumbence, before the other two Doctors comming, did deny vnto them [Page 52] the opportunity of the vse of those remedies, their season be­ing by delaying now passed, and a new indication offering a­nother and different counsell through Aurum potabile his preoccupation, and tyrannous vsurpation of their due time and season. The parson may as yet moue a doubt, whether Aurum potabile be not in it selfe able to supply the vse of purgation and phlebotomy? The contrar hereto is manifest, first by the proofe and triall thereof made, wherein by his owne testimony it is euident, that after the forsaking of the former remedies of phlebotomy and purgat on, and the ad­herence vnto Aurum potabile, there immediatly followed a plentifull decumbence of humours, swelling and possessing diuers parts, a long & languishing time. Secondly, that Au­rum potabile cannot be able to performe or supply the vse of the former remedies, is euident, for that no particular medi­cine of what vniuersality soeuer, hath euer as yet been found by experience, or knowne by reason, to drawe the bloud ele­ctiuely, or immediatly, in the proper masse & substance from the seuerall fit veines. For this cause therefore, where the masse and substance of the blood is either corrupted, or is growne an importable burden vnto nature, Aurum potabile can neither certainely, nor speedily (as is oft requisite) re­moue it, or euacuate it. Concerning purgation also, since it is manifest that the purgatiue vertue, or quality, is a proper, certaine, immediate, and ordinary operation of such things as are in their true nature purgatiues; Aurum potabile except, proued among the kinde and nature of purgatiues (which cannot agree with the nature of so perfect and absolute cor­diall) cannot, nor doth not in it selfe purge or euacuate. It may be obiected, how came it then to passe, that in this Gen­tleman it is said to purge so easily, pleasantly and plentifully? Hereto we answer, that this purging issued not from any cer­taine, or ordinary property in Aurum potabile, though then, or at some other times it may so happen thereto. For while Aurum potabile, haply as a Cordiall, dispelled from the heart [Page 53] offensiue humours, some of them it is likely, through their a­bundance, might fall into the common sinke or passage, and so by accident be purged away; but this kinde of purging is vncertaine, doubtfull, and not equally, according to vse and necessity, sufficient against the fulnesse and turgescence of hu­mours, which vnto a certaine module and measure require their certaine remoueall and euacuation. That Aurum pota­bile hath properly his place among Cordialls, both all gene­rall descriptions, and also the Apologist his owne particular confession in many places doth proue. And thus obiections satisfied, the fixed manifestation remaineth of M. Parsons ig­norance in this testimony, as also his insolence in vnderta­king aboue his reach, prowdly daring beyond his station, without any likelyhood or liuelyhood of performance. How void he is of true iudgement herein, as also of any liuely sap of true learning, the demonstration hath not beene obscure. Now as his presumption in his supposed learning, overda­ring beyond the slender muscles, is fowly fallen vnto the ground: so let vs view his vnnecessary, vnhonest, vnciuill, and crafty dealing, which hath solely ministred the matter, & oc­casion of all the scandall. Let mee put you in minde M. Par­son, that the Gentleman mentioned was first your patient. You had purged him and once let him blood before D r C. came vnto him, and were gone from him. After D r C. was come, had againe purged him, vomited, and once more let him blood (the supposed doubt and feare of those remedies being past) you then secretly came vnto him againe, secretly communed, and gaue vnto him Aurum potabile, were you not herein a Fox? Non redoles sed oles: It is no borrowed smell, it is your owne rancke sauour. Let me yet farther tell you, that after Aurum potabile was thus secretly giuen by Master Markes vnto the patient, immediatly the patient, together with his wife (contrary vnto their former courteous and friendly vsage of D r C. before, in his many fortunate imploy­ments amongst them many yeares together) now accuse him [Page 54] vnto his face of erroneous iudging and practising in this one particular, with constant asseueration, that this assertion was auouched by some, both honest and learned, whom they would not name. No other reputed learned, or any Physiti­an, but M. Markes his marked selfe, had as yet beene with them. Thus remarkable was M. Markes his second secret vndertaking and returne vnto the patient. Let me yet once more rub your galled memory. When vpon the former iust reason of suspition D r C. did write vnto M. Markes, requi­ring him to iustifie, or denie with the patient the former im­putation, his answere was by letter (the coppy whereof is to be seene at the end of the confutation of this testimony) his answere (I say) was that in his vnderstanding D r C. had pro­ceeded according vnto art and reason, as are his own expresse words. If M. Markes bee an honest and plaine dealing man, let him reconcile that letter with this testimony. The letter professeth D. C. his counsell and indeauours with the fore­mentioned Gent. to haue beene according to art and reason. This testimony attributeth altogether vnto Aurum potabile, & extenuateth, casteth behinde, or rather accuseth the meanes and remedies by D. C. administred, as after which the disease grew worse. Your meaning herein (M. Markes) is plaine, but plainenesse was not your meaning. If you did dissemble in your writing vnto D. C. it was very vnhonest and pusillani­mous. If you therein did not dissemble, why doe you here oppose that which you then did write? Your opposition is manifest; first, in making your selfe in the Apologie, the Cap­taine and leader vnto the contradictory Epistles of the Gen­tlemen: Secondly, by the same song or Paean, which perpetu­ally in all places you sing vnto the ptaise of your Aurum po­tabile: Thirdly, by your divulging the Apologie in my knowledge, wherein against your former letter, and your professi­on therein, you haue consented and concurred with the Gen­tlemen in the publishing of their deceaued testimonies, vnto the preiudice of D. C. his good deserts, and better meriting [Page 55] at their hands, acknowledged by your owne writing. Lastly, your contrary affection and opposition vnto your former letter and profession, is manifest by your euer since continu­ed custome & practise of the same abuse in all places of your accesse, for the venting and glory of Aurum potabile, peruer­ting thereby the cures of all other men by what other meanes soeuer, while by the insinuation of supreame felicity therein, you swallowe vp time and opportunity, discreet respect or care of all other mature or due counsell in any other kinde. Plato and Aristotle haue taught you better diuinity. As for humanity, this your practise doth proue you neuer educate thereto, nor touched therewith. Touching your three-fold learning, your treble profession, of a Physitian, a Chymist, a Diuine. Giue me leaue to acquaint you what Martial wri­teth of one Attalius a busie fellow much like your selfe.

Componis belle mimos Epigrammata bellè.
Bellus Grammaticus, bellus es Astrologus.
Et bellè cantas, & saltas Attale bellè.
Bellus es arte lyrae, bellus es arte pilae.
Nil benè cùm facias (facis attamen omnia bellè)
Vic dicam quid sis? Magnus es Ardelio.
Attall can compose and rehearse
Both Epigrammes, Mimikes, and Verse,
Somewhat in Grammer he is seene,
And in Astrologie doth weene;
Somewhat at song, harp, daunce, and bal [...]
In briefe by somewhats he is all.
But shall I tell you and not spare,
In all these somes summed you are:
In no some good, in some fewe pretty,
In busie medling only witty.

You would one while seeme a Physitian, now a Chymist, then a Divine, but like Attall at all you giue vnto the world no true evidence of the price and estimation of your worth in eyther, except in the sale and praise of Aurum potabile at a se­cond [Page 56] hand. Since then you will needlesly play the Physitian, giue me leaue a little also to play the necessary divine. Let me convert my speech (M r Markes) for your conversion, from your formerly proued ignorant practise (though by the Pa­tients opinion and good event salued) from your grand dis­sembling, from your open denying, and secret affirming the same contrary thing, from your vaine trust in such close and covert wrong, from your guilefull hoping to hide your vn­honest drifts, from your busie deviation out of your owne calling. Like vnto that creature which Aristotle calleth [...], and Cicero tearmeth ancipitem bestiam (that is, a mixt, vnperfect, or a mongrell beast) you shiftingly liue a miscellaneous life, and being by sacred vowes vnto God and his seruice consecrate, you intrude your busie ignorance into the office and propertie of other men, and obtrude your mer­cenarie counsell into euery cure almost of euery Physitian. Were it equall, thinke you, that Physitians should at plea­sure, in Churches and pulpits, preach and pray, yea though haply they might sometimes performe vnto God no lesse de­vout worship and adoration, and vnto men no lesse accepta­ble duetie? Diuines would tell you it were prophane, and iustly. If this intrusion in them were prophane, certainely yours is no lesse inhumane. It fitteth you not to intermit your bounden duetie of assiduous and entire studie, and en­deavour, in your owne vocation, nor to be so ignorant of the weight and worth of your owne profession, as to ouer-value your whole worthles selfe, as more then sufficient for that calling, vnto which no mans sufficiency was euer sufficient. It were in you a more proper praise and studie, diligently to compare your owne apparent meanesse and defects, with the eminence and excellence of other more learned and reverent Diuines, and to borrow your vnnecessary vacation from your owne vocation, to perfect your imperfections therein. Then should you not in your owne calling so oft rob God of his magnificate, nor sing out of your calling vnto man Magni­fico [Page 57] in scarce good Latin, or at least true herauldie, as you doe line 8, of your testimony in the Latin Copie. Then should you not be at leisure to serue two Masters, nor to call Hippo­crates your great Master, as you are not ashamed to doe in the same testimonic in the English Copie. God requireth his seruants totally and wholly to be his. Hippocrates also can very well spare you. Consider then, it is not malice or envy that thus reproueth and admonisheth you, but your owne vniust wrong and provocation, equall complaint, and the Lawes of God and men: vnto which therefore, I will now commit and leaue you, for your correction, reformation, and amendment. Worthy Reader, how much the sinewes and strength of this first domesticall testimonie are shrunke and weakened, I appeale vnto thy iust censure, as also how farre therein M r Markes hath taken his markes amisse. I will now only present vnto thee a true Copie of his dissembling letter vnto D r C. fore-mentioned, before, according to promise, I come to vnfolde and view the other two succeeding Testi­monies.

The true Copie of M r Markes his letter vnto D r C. according vnto the originall in D r C. his hand.

Good Master D r, I hope you will not impute or lay any blame vpon me for visiting S r W. S. being requested thereto; or for commending that medicine, which many of good worth haue allowed and commended. As for wronging you by such imputations as you speake of, assure your selfe that I am farre from it. For I must yeeld to you your right, as to a man learned in your facultie. And I know how vnfit it is for me to contradict your course, and doe in my vnderstanding thinke that you haue proceeded according vnto Art and rea­son. And therefore let me request you to conceaue better of me, then so to haue me in suspition vpon that challenge, [Page 58] which you complaine of, for I protest that I haue alwayes thought worthily of you, and so rest alwayes

Your louing friend Iohn Markes.

It may seeme not easily vnderstood, why before I taxed M r Markes his Latin and Herauldrie. It was for that in his Latin Copie he ignorantly and simply giueth the Epithete of Magnificus, Magnifici est in quocunque ge­nere, quod faciat magnificé id splendidèque fa­cere. Arist. Eth. lib. 4. cap. 2. Inter liberaiem & magnificum, hoc interest, quod hic in magnis, ille in parvis cernitur. Arist. Eth. l. 2. c. 2. as an ordinarie style to euery Knight, whereas Magnificence is properly attributed vnto Princes, & Prince­ly sumptuousnesse. Because it seemeth not iust to reproue Latin without Latin, nor his but by my own, I will giue him a taste of my Latin, vntill I can better feast him therewith.

Magnificus non est quem magni tu facis, ipse
Nam sic magnifico milite maior eris.
Magnificat qui non intelligis & legis, us (que)
Qui fici faciet Magnificè faciet.

I haue bestowed vpon you the Latin (M r Markes) now giue me leaue to giue my countrey-men the sense in their owne language also.

Were it within your owne extents
(Sir) to create Magnificents,
Your selfe would be the first create,
Old Adam sure would come too late
Your martialling Magnifico
Is Herauldrie, whereby we know,
You daily sing Magnificat
And know not the significat.
So dull a braine, so base a sense,
To scorne is true
Magnif [...] ­cence hath only high and heroick thoughts, not looking down vpon meane obiects. Animo amplo res mag­nas & excelsas administrat, & honorificè cogi­tat. Cicero.
Magnificence.

Since I haue begun, it will be now fit before I depart, that I bid farewell likewise vnto M r Markes his triple learning, in the learned Language. Thus then saluteth him the same Author,

[Page 59]
Quòd Chymicam, quòd Divinam, Medicam (que) facis rem,
Rem facis omninò praeterea (que) nihil.
Sed tua res non est. Nam debes rapta Sacerdos,
Quae rapis Ardelio, si benè vota facis.
A gainefull trade you make Physicke,
Thriue by the Divine and Chymicke,
In two meerely you are carnall,
And in but one spirituall.
'Tis two to one (we may feare it)
The world and gaine choake the splrit.
The gaine thus got, you backe doe owe
From whence you stole it, and then know
A true Divine doth not well pray,
Till that is stolne he first repay.

The second Testimony.

M r Doctor Anthony, though I haue no acquaintance with you at all, yet being an eye-witnesse of your generall charity extended to the whole world, in bringing to the vse of men the most excellent quintessence for the recti­fying of Nature, that the world (as I thinke) yet euer had: I am thereby emboldened to presume of your favour for some few graines of the same, which for the seuerall operations that I haue seene thereof in two speciall friends of mine, both at the point of death, shall in my esteeme for euer be held in most precious accompt. For you shall vnderstand that about a twelue moneths since, I came to a brother-in-lawes house of mine, one S r W. S. Knight in Northamptonshire, whom I found in great extremitie of sicknes, and thereby so weakned with the continuall torments he was in, that all which were about him feared him greatly. He had three Doctors in Phy­sicke, yet could none of them minister any thing to him, to giue him any ease of his torments, but rather tormented him more; vntill at last himselfe remembred that one M r Markes [Page 60] had commended this memorable medicine of yours, which being brought, he tooke it, and it wrought so miraculous an effect within the compasse of two houres, as neither he or I euer saw before. For it instantly deliuered him of his paine, which seemed before intolerable. It gaue him rest, which for many dayes and nights before he had bene barred of. It drew on an appetite by little and little, all meate before being loth­some vnto him. And which is most marvailous, whereas for­merly by his medicines excoriating those passages, he seemed to endure great torture vpon euery provocation to the stools he had now in the day and night fiue stooles, and euery pro­vocation was now as delightfull vnto him, as the other were tormenting. Then did one of his Physitians advise, that now he should take some Cordiall, to assist the faculties of nature, being very weake. But when this was propounded vnto my brother by his wife, he vtterly refused it, the Physitian bea­ring him in hand, that it was nothing els but Vnicornes horne, Bezoar stone, and such like. But after taking thereof, my bro­ther fell againe into his former tortures, and more vehement then before, whereby he was inforced the selfe-same night to send againe vnto M r Markes, who relieued him, as formerly he had done. Since which time (by Gods blessing) he hath continued well. After this manner an obstructed bodie was cured. It hath wrought a great effect in S. Iohn Hunt Knight of Leicester-shire, who late was very low brought into a fluxe, together with a burning feaver, and being neare vnto death, and voide of all other helpe, hee was relieued by the selfe-same medicine onely, and perfectly restored. M. Doctor Ashworth, who partly had seene, and partly heard these mira­culous effects of this your medicine, lying dangerously sicke at Oxford this last Sommer, sent his sonne in very greatest haste to M r Markes for some portion of this your medi­cine: his said sonne feared that at his returne he should not finde him liuing. But thankes be to God he liueth, and is wel, which is to bee attributed vnto your medicine, although [Page 61] peradventure he will not acknowledge the same, &c.

The refutation of the second Testimony.

IT may be wondred (gentle Reader) that gentlemen of re­puted worth and vnderstanding, should so much dispa­rage their owne esteeme, as in a profession or facultie, where­in they themselues are neither inabled, or in reason or deco­rum allowed, should be so confident as to oppose publiquely their private opinion against any man in his own Art, where­in he professeth, & is able to proue by infallible knowledge & demonstration, and hath daylie proofe and excercise thereof. The reason hereof (as I friendly in the behalfe of the Gentle­man, with good reason interprete) was their kinde trust vnto the broken reed of Markes his shivered learning, and his iuggling transportation thereby, of their imaginations, tho­row the flattering momentanie ease and pleasing, found in Aurum potabile. As therfore I haue in the refutation of Marks his testimonie, giuen demonstration of his ignorance therein, so will I in these testimonies, declare their errors and mista­king; from him, not intending the men, but the matter, nor purposing their offence, but my owne iust defence. In this se­cond testimony, first view (good Reader) how confidently it avoucheth an excoriation of the passages by other medi­cines, before Aurum potabile came. The qualitie of the medi­cines were vnknowne vnto them, whether carrying any pos­sibilitie of any such effect in their nature and custome. As for the supposed effect and excoriation it selfe, reason did giue no demonstration thereof, and therefore they cannot affirme it from any knowledge or certaintie. The outward sense could thereof giue no testimony, because it cannot pierce into the inward and hidden passages within. Likelyhood or probabi­litie [Page 62] thereof, artificial coniecture could not afford vnto them, because Art is not subiect vnto them, nor within their reach. And therefore without probabilitie they publish bare confi­dence and their owne conceipt. Now (worthy Reader) see a­gaine, how affection transporting without iudgement, doth offer manifest contradictions vnto it selfe. Here it is said, that after the giuing of Aurum potabile, the Patient was immedi­atly refreshed, and his obstructed bodie from that time cu­red. This appeareth manifestly contradicted by M r Markes his testimonie, who saith, that after Aurum potabile (which was giuen in March) the Gentleman continued grievously sicke vntill the 10. of September following, and after that time. Another contradiction like this, obserue here also. Three Doctors of Physick could not minister any thing to giue vn­to the patient ease (saith this testimonie.) Obserue (worthy Reader) the incongruity hereof. The one of these three Do­ctors was D r C. (so by them stiled.) The other two succee­ded after him, that is, the second vpon D r C. his point of de­parture; the third after it. Aurum potabile was giuen vnto the Patient while as yet D r C. was present, as appeareth by the third testimonie, where it was said, that after D r C. was gone vnto his rest, the Patient in the night did send vnto M. Markes for Aurum potabile. After the receiuing of this Au­rum potabile, saith this testimonie, the Patient was relieued as formerly, since which time, by Gods blessing, he hath con­tinued well. The third testimonie confirmeth the same, saying that immediatly after Aurum potabile, the Patient found alle­viation, corroboration, and operation, as his soule would de­sire. If this be true, why are the two last Doctors accused for giuing no ease vnto the Patient. It appeareth that the Patient by their owne testimonies, had taken Aurum potabile before they came, and that Aurum potabile had relieued him, corro­borated and operated, as the Patients soule could desire. If Aurum potabile had relieued him before, what neede or vse was there to be expected of that office from the Physitians, [Page 63] and how iniuriously and vniustly are they taxed. Againe, if it were true, that after Aurum potabile, the Patient was relieued, and continued after well, as saith this testimony, and had such corroboration and operation thereby, as he could desire (as faith the third testimonie) why did they then send after this professed satisfaction, giuen first for the second Doctor, and after for the third, after▪ D r C. was gone? Any man may here see, how inconsiderate passion doth confute it selfe. Now once more (good Reader) obserue the maine complaint and mone of these testimonies, namely forsooth, that the Gentleman had no ease so speedily and promptly as he desired. It is no wonder nor vnusuall in sick men, to find vncertaintie of be­nefit and reliefe in remedies applied. Time, and their own pa­tience, aswell as medicines, doe worke therein. The sick in the variation and interchange of many excellent medicines, fin­deth oft little ease, and sometimes by hap in vnhoped, vnaffe­cted, and vnexpected meanes, obtaineth present & vnthought deliuery. It is not in the Physitians power alwayes to fore­see, where God in his secret decree hath set and appointed the time, manner, or particular instrument of ease and deliue­rance. That is vnto humane reason and vnderstanding casuall. His vpright and reasonable indeavour, and not the felicity, or infelicity of the medicine, is the proper, true, and thank-wor­thy merit. Neither is it the Physitians so proper office, so much to attend the Patients pleasing ease, as to intend the cure of the disease. Many paines are necessarie, though grie­vous, and seeming vntollerable. If the patient shall be alwaies presently pleased with ease, there shall neuer be Vomits giuen vnto sicke men, nor purging administred, that shall grieue & make weake the sicke, nor shall any man be let blood vntill he faint, which in many and divers cases is so necessary, that without it can be no life. In these cases the Patient is no com­petent iudge, nor ought floting fancie, wanting Art and true reason for Pylot, make sense his card. That thou mayest more perfectly and infallibly know the partiall affection of [Page 64] these testimonies (ingenious Reader) see here lastly in this testimony, a needlesse diligence and officiousnesse toward Aurum potabile, in the oblique nomination of a learned, graue, and reverend Doctor vnto no vse or purpose. In a great exigent of sicknes forsooth, he did send from Oxford for Aurum potabile. What is this unto the matter? In extremity of sicknes, who knoweth not, that the most wise and learned that euer liued, doe oft-times want their free election and ap­prehension, being distracted by sicknes, not only from their owne true worth, but from themselues. It is not therefore materiall, whether the Doctor vpon his own suddaine moti­on, or others mention, did send or invite this golden guest. The sending doth not necessarily inferre the vse; nor the vse, the commendations: and whether the Doctor himselfe doe attribute ought thereto, the blazers themselues doe there doubt, as appeareth by their own words. That we may giue vnto them herein, compleate and vndoubted satisfaction; I will here insert that worthy Doctor his owne answere vnto me therein, solicited by my letter therewith, crauing his iudi­cious view of my reply vnto Doctor Anthony his false, iniu­rious, and scandalous Apologie. This is the true Copie of his Answere.

Salutem in Christo.

S r, I haue seene and perused your answere to a late Apo­logie written by D. Anthony, I thinke it worthy to be pub­lished, and conuenient to bee printed, both for the mainte­nance and defence of your estimation & credit, which in that Apologie seemeth to be aymed at, and for the better informa­tion of them, who by the superficiall arguments and incredi­ble vaunts made in that booke for the vniuersality and effi­cacy of his Aurum potabile, may bee deluded and drawne to an vndeserued admiration of it. The vniu [...]rsality of this me­dicine is well and sufficiently refuted by you. The efficacy thereof is set forth with such words and commemoration of [Page 65] miraculous effects, as to a naturall Philosopher and sensible Phisitian, and to any iudicious person may seeme to surpasse humane reason. I thinke not that miracles are in these times so frequent and many of the proposed examples are not so miraculous, as they seeme. For belike D. Anthony would haue vs beleeue, that who so hath taken of his Aurum potabi­le and escaped death, escaped by the vertue & efficacy there­of. This is a fallacy, non causa pro causa. I purpose not now to examine other particular examples wherein his fallacies may be displayed, but because I my selfe am brought in to be a spectacle in this stage, I would make it knowne both by word and writintg, hat I was sicke 1612. as M. Hen. Skipwith writeth. I fell sicke in the latter end of August. A semitertian ague possessed me, and grieuously afflicted me (as the condi­tion of it is) with faintnesse and weaknesse, besides other acci­dents vsuall to agues as lothsomnesse and distast of all kind of meats and drinks, vomiting, vnequall & greiuous distem­pers, losse of sleepe, suppression of vrine, lightnesse of head in the heat of the fit. In time of some extasie, or otherwise, vpon the famous mention and commendation which not long be­fore I had heard S r William Samwell knight, giue to Aurum potabile for present releiuing him in extreame faintnesse, and qualifying his outragious distempers; I sent my sonne, or hee went to S r William Samwell for some of that medicine, and by his meanes to M. Markes: he got some for his money, and at that time also some of my friends procured some of it from D. Anthony. So I did take some of it twise, but (as God knoweth) with so little fruit, either of ease of my maladies, or cure of my ague, that their grieuousnesse increased many daies after, and continued from that time viz. 14 h September vntill the end of October, notwithstanding all the ayd that many my good frends, as learned (in my iudgement) as Do­ctor Anthony, & more learned in Phisicke (I dare say) then M. Markes, could afford vnto me. I thanke God I recoue­red yet hardly and slowly. I maruell that M. Skipwith doth [Page 66] so confidently write, that my life and health is to be attribu­ted to D. Anthonies medicine, seeing nether presently I found any ease by it, nor in fortie dayes after any beginning of re­couery or declination of my disease. And although the 20 of Ianuary following I was aliue, as M. Skipwith writeth, yet I was not well, as he auoucheth, for many impressions and in­firmities of that ague did then sticke grieuously in my body, and long time afterward, so that for the most part of the spring following, and of the next Autumne, I continually vsed Phisicall rules. He notwithstanding argueth thus. I did take Aurum potabile, & therefore thereby I recouered. This is an Elench and fallacious argument, such as are many of those which by testimonies are recited in D. Anthonies Apo­logie. Whereas M. Henry Skipwith saith, that I had partly seene, and partly heard the miraculous effects of this medi­cine. I haue often said, and doe now protest, that I neuer yet did see any miraculous effect of it, except he will thus argue. I did see S. William Samwell, on whom it was thought to worke miraculously, therefore I did see the miraculous work and effect of this medicine. Elenchus est compositionis.

Whereas the same Gentleman saith, that peraduenture I will not acknowledge that my recouery is to be imputed to this medicine: He calleth my good minde and thankfullnesse towards God and man into question, beyond any commissi­on knowne to me to be granted vnto him. And I confesse that in this duty of thankfulnesse for Gods mercifull and bountifull blessings and benefits, as in other duties I haue beene and am defectiue. But I see no cause, why in writing & in print I should be noted and published faultie or suspected, especially in a matter which is rather put vpon me, then true in it selfe, and by them who can challenge no more sinceritie and holinesse to themselues (for ought I knowe) then other men that liue vnder the burden and infection of humane cō ­dition. I did neuer giue to my remembrance, by word, wri­ting, or vsage, occasion of offence to M. Henry Skipwith, yet [Page 67] it seemeth that he had a minde to set vpon me particularly & by name in the end of that his letter, when as couertly, and without name he had taxed, or rather wounded mee with o­thers without name in the fore part of it. S. William Samwell fel sick about the end of March, or beginning of April, 1611. M. Markes was his first Phisitian, and vsed remedies of pur­ging and phlebotomie, as appeareth by the answere to his letter the first domesticall testimonie. D. C. being afterward sent for, vsed his endeauour and conuenient remedies. M. Markes exhibited Aurum potabile once, and afterwards a­gaine. Since that time, as M. Skipwiths words in his letter sound, he continued well. It is then maruell that he sent for D r Lapworth and for me. At D r Lapworths comming to him he was very ill before Whitsontide. At my comming to him after Whitsontide, he was somewhat relieued, but yet groa­ning vnder the burthen of many infirmities, as also long time afterward. So that I see not how it might be iustly said that he continued well after the twise taking of the Aurum pota­bile vnto the date of M. Skipwith his letter 1612, Ianuary 20. A saying more vniust is auouched in that letter, viz: that at M. Skipwiths comming to Vpton to visit his brother in his extremity, hee had three Doctors with him. D r. Lapworth came thither many daies after; and my comming was many daies after D r Lapworth. And before our commings wee did not heare that any D r of Phisicke was there beside D. Cotta. If any, or so many Doctors were there, it behoueth them to quit themselues of this imputation, viz: that they tormen­ted the patient. D. C. hath answered sufficiently for himselfe. Oftentimes profitable medicines exasperate the disease & in­crease paine for a while. Nulla remedia tam faciunt dolorem quam quae sunt salutaria. If M. Markes was one of those Do­ctors, he tormented first and healed afterwards. Ʋna eadem (que) manus vulnus opem (que) [...]alit. It were fitter for M. Markes, and men of the ministery, & of that excellent profession, especially such as haue cures and charge of soules, for which they re­ceaue [Page 68] Tythes, and other annuall profits, to harken to S. Paul, who counselleth them to attend their reading, to attend their flocke, to attend their office & function, rather then to watch at the furnace as Laborants, or to keepe a shop of medicines as Apothecaries, or to practise Phisicke as intruders, or to wander abroad vnlawfully as vagrant persons, seeing they may be & are Parsons at home, or to giue doubtfull answers as Wizards, or to erect false figures as Impostors; or to pro­fesse soothsaying as Magitians, or to peruert sicke men from religion as dissemblers; or to leaue their function as Apo­states; or to doe the worke of the Lord negligently, as they which in holy Scriptures are accursed. Ʋale egregie Doctor, Et spartam quam nactus es tueri ne dubites.

Your assured friend Henry Asbworth.

By this letter & counter-testimony, it is not obscure how nimble and prone [...]in the Authors of the three first domesti­call testimonies is their needlesse arrogation vnto Aurum potabile; supposing their vnderstanding awake, when indeed it is only in a dreame. This is the vsuall disease or coma of these daies. Thus men that are in loue with their owne parti­al thoughts, vsually itch at euery light occasion to offer these like loue-trickes vnto the Lady and Mistris of their fond af­fection, their selfe conceit. I doubt not but by that which I haue here manifested, and apertly produced and proued, eue­ry vulgar eye may discouer the euident partiality, and errour of this second testimonie. I will omit further to take occasi­on to call it vnto so strict account, or sifting, as is warranted by the vniust prouocation therein offered. It is sufficient that the maine matter and question is sufficiently cleared to bee out of question, by the confutation of the first testimony, as also that in this second is nothing worthy confuting, but that which hath confuted it selfe.

The third testimony.

MActe vir probitate & scientia singulari. My wiues bro­ther, M r▪ H.S. lately told me how friendly mention of me you made to him. He might very well haue reciprocated, and said, how oft mention hee hath heard me make of you [...] yet howsoeuer I must euer acknowledge my selfe obliged vnto you in double bonds. For in my last greeuous & long languishing sicknesse, when my then Phisitian D r C. stagge­red in his iudgement of my disease, and in the hope of my re­couery, he seemed to quaile, yea when my selfe, and al my be­holders did dispaire of my life, then by Gods prouidence, a friend telling the rare vertues of your Aurum potabile, cau­sed two graines of the same to be dissolued into fiue spoone­fulls of Endine water, and so to be ministred vnto me. After receauing thereof, within one houres space, it is incredible to be spoken, what alleuiation I found of my languishing, and what corroboration of all my vitall, parts. In the morning I tooke it, and vntill night I felt a most happy operation there­of. It procured stooles all that day so pleasingly as my soule could desire, vntill such time as my Phisitian, after he had ta­ken his leaue of me for that night, and that I had now com­posed my selfe to rest, came againe vnto me, hauing vpon the point of a knife somewhat, which hee did put in my mouth, being then almost asleepe. But about mid-night when I did awake, I found my selfe relapsed as before. Then vtterly dif­pairing of my life, I called (as I thought my last call) vnto my wife, intreating her to send againe to my foresaid freind, to intreat him to consider, whether in his iudgement two graines were not too small a proportion to ouercome the malignity of so dangerous a disease. Hee therefore gaue mee this second time three graines, which speedily, as before, and wonderfully did refresh my spirits, & thereby my body was very soluble for the space of Seauen dayes after. And not­withstanding [Page 70] sundry evocations, euery day my strength daily encreased. Then was that Doctor exceedingly angry that I did entertaine his counsel no longer, since which time he hath wrote an English booke, vncharitably defaming me, and ca­villing against that famous medicine, which by the proui­dence of God, restored me both life and health. Now concer­ning the cheife intention of these my letters, I pray you send me 12 graines of your potable gold, in such forme as my brother lately receaued from you. This bearer my freind shall giue you satisfaction for the same, &c. The author of health is God, who perpetually preserue you, vnto whom hee hath vouchsafed such fauour as to attaine vnto so great a restorer of health, and prolonger of life as this Aurum potabile appea­reth to be. Farewell Rev: D r.

Your most louing friend VV. S.

The Refutation of the third Testimony.

THe maine in tent of this testimony is the praise and ho­nour of Aurum potabile, and the vilification of D r C. his indeauour. Aurum potabile was prosperous, other medi­cines were offensiue and vnfortunate vnto the patients case. How then? Is this sufficient simply to contemne the one, or exalt the other? Is this in true reason iustly to be exprobra­ted against the Author or dispenser of the one, or truely ad­ding worth vnto the Author of the other? Who is ignorant that the variation, election, or preferring by the Phisitian of one medicine, rather then another of the same kinde, is euer as touching the euent vncertaine, and in euery small circum­stance still changeable and variable. The proofe also of true Sympathie betweene this or that medicine, and this or that particular person, consisteth in no certainty of infallible dire­ction founded vpon any vndeceauing or assured ground of [Page 71] art or rrason, but vpon speciall trialls thereof alone, and such as are altered vpon euery change or differing circumstance. For this cause in iust ballance weighed vnto art it selfe, or the Phisitians merit or worth, there is nether praise due, when a medicine so giuen succeedeth weil, nor disparagement deser­ved when it falleth out ill. Vnauoidable casualtie of good or ill indifferently in these cases is vsuall, and all men the most excellent, exquisite, and scientificall that euer were are subiect thereto. No man whatsoeuer can foresee the secret and hid­den sympathie, which that or this particular nature rather hath with this then that particular medicine. It is onely the long and oft obserued proofe and triall that must giue de­monstration thereof. Aurum potabile, in this patients sense, in his Phisitians profession was a Cordiall. So was that which D. C. did administer, and in many other bodies hath beene nothing inferiour vnto Aurum potabile, euen to the vt­most extent of the praise and worth which the patient doth att [...]ibute thereto. At this time, and in this Gentleman, it hap­pened not to be fortunate, as was Aurum potabile. Is this sufficient reason contemptibly to mention D. C. his meanes carefully and artificially applyed with good intention in himselfe, and good indication in the disease and cause? Nay is this sufficient matter to reuile, to hate D. C. to charge him him with loathed insufficiency, openly and secretly to prose­cute him with all interiour malice. This is a secret I vnder­stand not. It is here said that D. C. was angrie sorsooth, be­cause his counsell was refused. Hee did neuer obtrude his coūsell, nor would haue daigned it, if he could haue fore-seen such inordinate and intemperate manner. If hee were angry, his anger was only for that the counsell, by which the patient had in reason receaued the first and maine good (as I haue proued in the confutation of the first testimony) was against reason so indignely forgot and vilified. For this cause hee did iustly disdaine the vniust wrong, and did openly and profes­sedly no lesse readily refuse, that he was refused in the view & [Page 72] hearing of many witnesses. Whereas it is said that D. C. stag­gered in his iudgement, and quailed in the hope of recouery. It was no more then occasion did require, as may appeare first in the patients aduersnesse vnto himselfe: Secondly, in Markes his description of the patients estate, as also by the deliberation and pause which Aurum potabile did take for his imperfect recouery which was from D. C. his desertion of the cure in March vnto the date of the first domesticall te­stimony September 10 th. Whereas it is obiected that D. C. did write a booke inhumanely handling the patient with ca­lumnies. It is meere misprision. The patient was neuer in a­ny treatise by him nominated nor so much as described in any such sort, as he can iustly any way appropriat vnto himselfe. There was neuer any wrong really done vnto him, but onely in his owne opinion. What in any priuate speech hath passed that might seeme to touch him, it was extorted and vnauoi­dable for the wronged his necessary and iust defense, being prouoked by all extremity of dispite. As for the book which is tearmed vaine, it is able to answere for it selfe, and was ne­uer as yet put to silence. Now vnto the matter it selfe. It is doubted whether the patient be beholding vnto D. C. in any part for his care and precedent paines, or soly and totally vn­to Aurum potabile succeeding after. It doth not follow that because Aurum potabile pleased the patient his ease, sense and desire; therefore it doth performe the reall true benefit in right vnderstanding vnto the health. It were ridiculous if a­ny man should thus reason. This way is a faire way, a plea­sant greene way, pleaseth and refresheth me, Ergo, it is my way home. This is a thorny, ragged, crooked way, and much troubleth and discontenteth me, Ergo, it is not the way vnto my intended iourney. The way vnto health is oft times as the way vnto heauen, smally pleasing. It is not the pleasures or refreshing in the way, but the true end and expected issue thereof, which indueeth the iudicious with content, perseue­rance, and patience, to walke therein. In the right method of [Page 73] regular cure, and according vnto art and reason D. C. did proceed, by the confession of M. Markes his letter going be­fore at the end of the confutation of the second testimonie. The truth thereof likewise doth proue it selfe by demonstra­tion, in the same fore-mentioned confutation. Common rea­son, and the generall course and custome of all Phisitians in the like case or occasion, doe vncontrouersly confirme the same. How can it then be iust or reasonable that D. C. gui­ding his honest intention, and care of the patients good, by true art, by likely reason, and in all artificiall order & course confessed, should notwithstanding, bee blamed and blasted with an euill breath, because the present or speedy euent was not according vnto expectation equally prosperous & hap­py; or because the patient thereby found not ease. What the disease was is apparent by Markes his description, namely a burning feauer. The remedies in that disease euer requisite & necessary in ordinary regular cure, were by D. C. administred according vnto art and reason, as saith the same Markes. The Patient complaineth in this course, hee as yet found no ease, Plethore v­nicum ac pro [...] ­um remedium venae sectio. Fer­nel. de Meth. M [...]d. b. 2. c. 4. but rather increase of paines. Vpon this ground and reason Aurum potabile vndertaketh and the former proceeding con­fessed according vnto art and reason is repelled and interrup­ted. What reason can be herein, or wi [...]h what reason can any cunning fixe any iust blame vpon D. C. or derogate from his desert, being by true reason & rule iustified, whatsoeuer was the present issue or successe thereof, which more truely con­sisteth in God his holy designement, then in mans indeauours though neuer so faire or likely. And thus is the iniury and wrong done vnto D. C. made palpable vnto any common, and vulgar indifferent view. It is obiected that Aurum pota­bile gaue ease, which the other remedies did not. First, herein it is requisite to consider, that those likely and reasonab [...]e re­medies before mentioned, although their present benefit did not attend or accompany their vse (as is not alwaies or euer expected) yet their Humores à na­tura i [...] constituti­one eous (que) rece­dentes, vt neque victu ne (que) a [...]te­rati ne sol [...] e­mendari, neque c [...]loris naturalis beneficio in bo­nitatem p [...]istinā reduci possunt, purgat one sunt auferendi Fe [...]n. de Meth. Med. 3 cap. 1. certaine and vsuall knowne profitting in [Page 74] ordinary course, in certaine triall & common experience doth yeeld infallible ground of likely reason, that they did not on­ly their vsuall comodious benefit in that ease and happines, which did befall the sicke, but prospered & inabled the possi­bility of that reputed good in Aurum potabile. Secondly, let vs herewith compare & examine what that good was which vnto Aurum potabile is so gloriously ascribed, namely ease, corroboration, and refreshing vnto the patient. Notwith­standing these reputed grand benefits, the Patient continu­ed the space of halfe an yeare (as appeareth by Markes his testimonie) languishing, sick, & greeuously vexe [...] with paines & swellings in many parts. Au [...]ū potabile therefore gaue ease & refreshing, but cured not the disease being stil attēded with the decumbence & superfluity of humours. This is euer a ma­nifest argumēt of an imperfect Crisis, or cure, the perfect Crisis and cure neuer leauing behind any part of the old disease nor matter, or occasion of new, (which Physitians call Empyrheu­ma) but by manifest, perfect, & compleat evacuatiōs, suffici­ently remouing the superfluitie & excesse of vitious humors, which are the causes of disease. Since then after the vse of Au­rum potabile, plenty of humors still remaine, afflicting and op­pressing divers parts, therefore manifestly Aurum potabile was, as insufficient and defectiue in true and perfect cure, so also in due evacuation of humors, necessarily conductiue vn­to cure. And thus doth manifest reason informe, that Aurum potabile did vnseasonably intrude it selfe, and abruptly dis­continued more reasonable and necessary remedies. This hurt and iniurie, in reason Aurum potabile apertly committed, the only good it did, was reputed ease and refreshing vnto the Patient. This is indeed a pleasure and benefit in the interim, in cure, but no effecting, or effectuall perfecting of cure. Here may a question be moued, whether we may not safely trust Cordials (among which Aurum potabile is one) without phlebotomie or purgation, for the relieuing of nature, and cure of diseases, considering many diseases are seene to be so [Page 75] cured sometimes. When diseases thus happen to be cured, (which is very rare and seldome, and euer vncertaine) that it commeth by accident, and is casuall, no man is ignorant. It is true, that after Cordials, Nature is found sometimes inabled or stirred vnto many spontaneous expulsions, sometimes by bleeding, sometimes by vomiting, sometimes by sweat, some­times by purging, as in the aboue-named Gentleman, by his testimony of such like effects, in his Aurum potabile, may be haply granted. But we must obserue and distinguish, when, and how, Nature is hereto accustomed, and inabled; as also when she hath power, and when she hath no power thereto. For where the cause of the disease is absolute Lord or Ma­ster ouer Nature; as touching her owne daring to encounter, or as touching her possibility to resist, as also where she doth vnto her vttermost, resist and striue in vaine, (for that the causes of diseases, haue before gotten so strong holdes with­in her, that she can neuer raise or remoue them,) there the power of Nature is of no force by Cordials, nor can the most assiduous application of the most excellent Cordials prevaile, but are in all reason vainely obtruded, or at least vsed for a short time of slender releiuing only, except the Ideo in valdè acutis purgan­dum, ait Hippo­crates, eadem die si materia turgeat: d [...]fferre enim inquit in talibus malum. Aph. 10. sect. 4. generall re­medies giue more promptly the more proper supply, by the conquest, remouall, qualifying, or at least competent diminu­tion and lessening of the causes, by which solely diseases, col­lect, hold, and maintaine their vnmastered and irresistible greatnes against Nature. But where the cause of the disease is not absolute Lord or Master, but Nature is able in some de­gree or sort, to struggle and contend therewith, there she may be, and is, oft inabled by Cordials, sometimes to put by the present fury and malignity of a disease, sometimes to make an exchange of a more tollerable disease, for a more intollera­ble; a more dull, for a more sharpe; a chronick, for a more a­cute: yet still in these cases, or for the most part, or vsually, she remaineth a prisoner vnto diseases, though haply seeming sometimes, somewhat refreshed, or enlarged, by exchange of [Page 76] the diseases. There onely solely and truely, Cordials do effe­ctually prevaile to good or benefit, where the disease is not in it selfe vnto Nature importable, nor in the cause, doth totally depresse and sway her downe. For Cordials, although they doe manifestly repaire the decayed strength of Nature, yet can they not giue vnto Nature strength aboue that, which radically fundamentally, and originally shee before had, and possessed in her selfe. Nor can they inable her to beare any weight or loade of affection, aboue that Ideo pleniorem habitum bonam statim solvere monet Hippo­crates, tanquam periculosum vai­dè. Aph. 3. sect. 1 her strength. Nor can they by repairing, or reducing her vnto her most perfect and able strength in her selfe thereby, giue alwayes suffic ent provocation, or needfull stimulation (when she is oft-times forgetfull, dull, or idle) to resist and expell from her, those n­ward and secret hidden enemies of her life, which remaining within her, doe commonly by secret vnder-myning, without their expulsion, swiftly, and suddainly, oft strangle and kill her. We see for this cause, that vpon manifest comfortation and assistance by Cordials, Nature is oft encouraged, and lightened for a short time, to make offer of resistance of ex­pelling her disease, of enlarging her selfe; but in the end, the Humores co­pia suavires pre­munt, suffocant temperamenti mediocritatem, alterant, cor­rumpuat, his (que) nominibus sunt exitiales. Gal. de Meth. Med. 12. sect. 5. cause of her oppression, & therewith the oppression it selfe, remaining still vnremoued, after some struggling and striuing in vaine, she is conquered, and yeeldeth vp the ghost. He is no Physitian, nor so much as a man injoyning common sense, that is hereof ignorant, or will deny it. And thus it is appa­rent, that vnto Cordials (as touching the certaine profligati­on of diseases) it is no prudence or wisdome, ordinarily, or v­sually to trust, although sometimes the strength of Nature, when she is manifestly superiour vnto the vehemence of the disease, being assisted and revived by Cordials, doth casually wynde her selfe out of some imminent and present dangers. If any man shall obiect, that Aurum potabile hath a larger property or vertue, then is comprehended in a Cordiall a­lone, let him peruse the description, which any learned Wri­ter or Author hath giuen thereof. Let him read Raymundus [Page 77] Lullius, and Arnoldus de villa nova their descriptions, alled­ged and produced by the Apologist. Read the first in the 5. reason, of the first part of the Apologie; the second in the third reason of the same part. Read his owne ample descrip­tion also, of the natures, qualities, and vse thereof, succeeding immediatly Arnoldus his praises thereof, before-mentioned. Read the beginning of his 5. reason. There most manifestly, as also in other places of this worke, and in the former Authors, it [...]ppeareth without all doubt or question, simply, and in it selfe, to be solely a Cordiall. Now (worthy Reader) vouch­safe to call to minde from the former discourse, vpon what an ayrie foundation, the praises of Aurum potabile in the three first testimonies, hath built her nest, namely, the Patients flat­tering ease, Markes his ignorant susurration, and a strong o­pinion, bewitched with Aurum potabile. And thus is appa­rent, how the Authors of the three first domesticall testimo­nies, that they might wrest out somewhat, which might sound or tune vnto the disgrace of D r C. for his thank-wor­thie paines, and vndeserued good-will towards the Patient, haue studiously in their testimonies, set nothing vpon the racke, and out of nothing, haue extorted nothing. Their par­tialitie, errour, and wrong, is not therein obscure, nor can a­ny obseruer be ignorant, vpon how false things therein, doth hang the supposed worth of Aurum potabile. According vnto my former promise, and the common rule of discretion, I will intermeddle with no other testimonies of the Apolo­gie, that concerne me not. These which doe concerne me, & whose reason and affection, Authors, and other circumstan­ces, are well knowne vnto me, I haue here iufficiently sifted, winnowed, and found meere chaffe. By the ignorance, vn­truth, error in iudgment, want of right distinction, intempe­rance of passion, misprision, contempt and abuse of right rea­son manifested in them, the possibility and likelyhood of the worthlesnesse, trifling, or insufficiency of many other, is not obscure. As for the maine scope, whereat they all doe aime, [Page 78] which is the boast of happie issues in Aurum potabile; if all the testimonies were granted true, and none were false or mi­staken in that kind, (as I haue euidently proued some) yet were not that sufficient to iustifie the common, rash, and pre­cipitate trust, and vse of Aurum potabile, since good successes and events, are alone no sound arguments, or evidences of any perpetuity of excellency in any kind. Neither do good successes necessarily inferre true Art, or evict the merit or praise of the workeman, but where therewith his worth is clearely likewise proued, either directiue thereto, or opera­tiue therein. For this cause saith the Poet,

—Careat successibus opto
Quisquis ab eventu facta notanda putat. Ovid.
Ill him betide in his intents,
Who iudgeth workes by their events.

Nor can D r An: be ignorant, that ill attempts do oft-times well prosper:

Prosperum ac faelix scelus
Virtus vocatur. saith Seneca.
While some men doe thriue well in ill,
Most men a vertue deeme the skill.

It is not therefore the good successe that doth proue any thing or action good, either in the nature, end, or vse. This argument therefore for Aurum potabile his goodnes, is so far from good, that it is vnlearned, temerarious, rotten, and vn­sound.

CAP. VI.

NOw hauing declared the falsitie, and depraued end and vse of some of your testimonies, best knowne vnto my selfe, I will next according vnto promise, recite other some, which in true reason, in Art, in the generall counsels, decrees, and experience of all Physitians, are infalli­bly, and altogether void of credit, or possibility in themselues. [Page 79] This is evident by your proposing your curation of such dis­eases as are incurable. See page 86. where you report your cu­ration of a Marasme, as saith your Latin Copie. Your English Copie page 94. ignorantly translateth your word Marasmus an extreame debility. We must needs take the Latin for the text, and the originall. The impossibility of curation of Ma­rasme, is evident vnto him who knoweth what Marasmus is Galen in his booke de Marcore, doth teli you that it is cor­ruptio corporis viventis propter siccitatem, that is, the currup­tion, wasting, or destruction of a liuing body, thorough dry­nes, or privation of the radicall and life-giuing moisture. Ma­rasme is the highest degree of a consummate consumption. For this cause he saith in the same place, that it is incurable. Marasmus omnes corporis partes similiter absumit. Attenua­tos verò sanârunt, qui Marasmum se sanâsse putârunt, circa affectionum genera errantes: that is, a Marasme consumeth all parts of the bodie alike. They haue only cured leane and exte­nuate bodies, who ignorantly erring and mistaking the diffe­rent kinds of diseases, haue thought that they haue cured bo­dies consumed with the Marasmus. Thus your grosse ig­norance, in not putting true difference betweene the kinds of consumptions, doth necessarily convince the falshood of your reports and testimonies of their curation, since no man can affirme truth, concerning things by him not truely distingui­shed. Thus your affirmation of your curation of Marasmus, doth appeare vnto all learned men, vnlearned, and not true. Concerning your reports of the curation of other kindes of consumptions likewise, obserue the weaknes, page 86 of the Latin Copie, you avouch a man cured in few dayes, page 87 of the Latin Copie, you report another cured brevissime, that is, most speedily. The English Copie, 95 page, translateth it ti­morously, as doubting the Latin was too bold, and ill advi­sed. Who knoweth not, that knoweth least in Physick, that all consumptions are Chronick, and bringing diseases, and neces­sarily, and vnavoidably requiring length of time vnto their [Page 80] restauration, repairing or reducing vnto former health, can­not be in any reason or possibility, truly said brevissimè, that is, very speedily, or in few dayes cured. Obserue yet further, that Aurum potabile must needs be ignorantly and fal [...]ely reported, to be the proper remedie vnto consumptions, ex­cept it be a restauratiue, since in restauration consisteth the true cure of consumptions. How farre Aurum potabile is dis­crepant herefrom, let these words of the most subtill Scaliger determine, Exercit. 272. Is verò qui auro vescitur Aurum fiet. Cuius natura cùm longissimè diste [...] à natura nostra, neuti­quam nostrae licebit per illam restaurari: that is, he that feedeth vpon gold, must needs be a golden substance, or gold it selfe: the nature thereof since it is so farre remote from humane na­ture, it is impossible for our nature to be restored thereby. Obserue yet once more, that some doubt may be iustly made whether Aurum potabile alo [...]e, may not do hurt in consum­ptions, since it seemeth a thing inclining vnto drynesse and heat, by his Maste [...]s mixture thereof with cooling things in hot diseases. Things inclining, though moderatly, vnto dry­nes or heat, are adverse vnto consumed and wasted bodies. Ill would it fare with Antony, if his flesh vnto the bone consu­med, were only to be restored by Aurum potabile, which yeel­deth in quantity, so vnlikely a pittance vnto restauration (since in so few and small graines only administred) and in the qua­lity rather hard mettall, then tender fl sh, or ought thereinto [...] &c. Au­rum & argen­tum, aut metal­la, à calore no­stro concoqui aut dissolvi non pof­sunt. Aristot. [...]. Probl. 42. Aurum est in­coctile Scaliger Exercit. 272. convertible. Let him try and trust it, if he thinke good Let him dine, suppe, breakfast, frolick, feast therewith alone some few weekes. I doubt he sooner shall turne into Midas, then gold into him, to nourish him, and in the end with Midas may say, as the Poet of him doth sing.

Cop [...]a nulla famem relevat, sitis arida guttur
Vrit, & inviso semper torquetur ab auro.
Gold store, nor's thirst, nor throates heat quell,
But gnawes his heart with hunger sell.

Beware then (Doctor An) lest if you make tryall, that [Page 81] which of the same Poet is said of the same Mulas, be verified of both:

Induiturque aures lentè gradientis aselli.
For want of fore-advised feares
There steale vpon him Asses eares.

Thus much concerning the falsehood, in reason of your cu­ration of consumptions by Aurum potabile. As loosly like­wise elsewhere, you either ignorantly miscall, or mistake con­tinuall feavers, or els speake not truth of their curation. Read this foule lapse page 50 of the Latin Copie, which as the most Authentike I haue wholly followed. There the Latin Copie in the margi [...] note saith, continua febris, that is, a continuall feaver, which notwithstanding afterward in your relation of the manner thereof, proueth a manifest intermitting ague, en­ding with a plaine infebricitation, or [...]. The cold, say you, did not hold long, the burning 3 or 4 houres. The En­glish Copie page 56, translateth as ignorantly continua febrie, in the margine afore-said of the Latine Copie, a continuing Quotidian. To leaue your barbarous improprietie of tearmes and speech, let vs come vnto your assertions themselues, con­cerning your curations by Aurum potabile, of continuall fea­vers, and burning feavers specified page 58, 59, of the English Copie. Galen in his 9 booke de Meth. Medendi, doth demon­strate the Prime and maine necessity of Phlebotomie in all continuall or continent feavers, which the Greeks distinguish by these termes of [...] and [...]. Maximum & prae­cipuum remedium, saith he, est missio sanguinis, sine qua plerun (que) sequitur aut Suffocatio, aut Syncope lethalis. He indeed in the same place granteth, that Nature being strong, and the in­flammation within mediocrity, sometimes by some large spontaneous profusion of blood, at nose, or at some other part, sometimes by some large or copious breaking forth of sweat, or the like, Nature may haply free and deliuer her selfe in some continuall feavers. But where Nature is ouer­come by many degrees of the feaver, or of the aboundance of [Page 82] putrified humor s in the blood or veines, or of their excelling boyling inflammation, without Phlebotomie, Nature can ne­uer be relieued, and the feaver must needs be killing, deadly, and mortall. For this cause and reason, saith the same Author, lib. 3. de Crisib. cap. 9. Plurimi in accessionum principijs propter materiae multitudinem, aut inflammationis magnitudinem, inte­reunt. Many sicke men doe die euen in the beginning of the exacerbations of their sicknes, through the mighty oppression of the abundance of humors, or the excelling greatnes of their inflammation. Who then doth not see the inevitable necessity and ingruence of certain death in these exigent if the discreet administration of Phlebotomie be not suffic [...]t in time to prevent it? Can Aurum potabile here play the Chirurgion, or let blood? or can it so comfort Nature, that aboue Na­tures fundamentall and radicall power, she shall performe in the power thereof, that which is impossible? Is he wor­thy to be a licensed Physitian, who maintaineth, and closely soweth these serpentine errours and absurdities, so mor­tall and pernicious vnto the life of man? Did euer any learned Physitian, with such enormious ouer-plus of at­tributes, fixed vpon any one particular medicine, seeke and indeauour to robbe and spoile the sicke so totally, and wholly, of all mature care, respect, or consideration of the generall necessity and vse of the generall remedies, neuer safely nor prudently of any age, time, learned writers, or Phi­sitians omitted? Who beside your selfe hath euer in any age, or time perswaded simply, or without carefull addition to trust alone in burning or continuall feauers, vnto any one sin­gle helpe or medicine? Look and view Rulandus in his Cen­tuaries, who although in the Chymicke preparation of many excellent remedies (as Quercitanus reporteth and iudgeth of him) he far excelled your excellence, that is faine to praise it selfe in one medicine alone. Although I say in multiplicity of excellent Chymicke preparations, hee vniuersally and in many hath excelled your owne single vniuersalitie, yet shall [Page 83] you not finde in any one curation among so many hundreths at any time, any of those his Famespread particular medicines vsed without the precedence of the general remedies, Phlebo­tomie and Purgation. View any other Chymicke-Phisitians, Libauius, Gunitherius, Andernacus, Quercitanus, or whoso­euer else hath obtained any note or name among the learned, and you shall finde no man but your selfe in continuall fea­vers to attribute absolute, certainty, perfection, or safetie of cure in any one meane or medicine whatsoeuer, omitting the carefull and circumspect regard of the mature administration of Phlebotomie. You will answere that toward the conclu­sion of your Apologie, and in that your last farwel, or Chap­ter of the vse of Aurum potabile, you doe admit Phlebotomy in conuenient time, as also purging. This is your ordinary practise to abuse the simple and vulgar reader, to intice by confused proiects at large scattered, his trust and beleefe, and afterward in some obscure sort or manner, and in some lesse obserued place sparingly to insert a cunning limitation, or contradiction thereof, thinking thereby to salue the doubt & question of your falsehood and deceit, which you doe fore­see that the better aduised may in reason iustly make. To what other ende doe you without difference or distinction, professe simply, pronounce, & iterate in so many places your curations of continuall Feauers by Aurum potabile, mentio­ning it meerely, solely, and by it selfe, but that when the cre­dit of that professiō so oft inculcated, hath fully setled it selfe in the vulgar braine without addition or consideration of o­ther respect, You may then speakingly, and more vnobser­vedly thrust in that, which may serue you for caution against iust challenging: that thus not easily espied of those whome you purpose to make a monopolie, by their inchaunted and deceaued trust in your Aurum potabile, you may still conti­nue thē inthralled vnto fraud, vnder pretense of extraordina­ry loue and care of the general good & humane health which you seeme to professe.

[Page 84]
Tuta frequens (que) via est per amici fallere nomen. Ovid.
The fairest way to fowlest deed,
Most frequent, safe, and sure to speed,
Is in bright shape of friendly hue,
To cloath deceit, but still seeme true.

Thus haue I breifly detected the fraud, ignorance, & im­possibility of some of your testimonies in true & sound rea­son, in the common reception of art and exercise of true lear­ning. I now come to shew vnto you, that there are other m [...] ­dicines and remedies, nothing inferiour, but equal in their ef­fects, vnto your testified praises, and praised testimonies of Aurum potabile.

CAP, VII.

AS in your exaltations of the effects and successes of Aurum potabile, you drawe forth solely, or for the most part, such testimonies as testifie within your owne experience of your owne triall, so will you haply ex­pect that I should hold the same euen proportion and equall such issues vnto Aurum potabile, as may match it with medi­cines in my owne practise and proofe. This I will therefore accordingly doe, that thereby you may the better conceaue that it is not so difficult, or so praise-worthie (as you deeme it) for any practiser in his owne priuate course, to take iust occasion to magnifie his medicines, and their manifold won­dred issues, if wise men did not consider that too much won­der doth argue ignorance, and ignorance more vsually then true science doth dote vpon such vaine glory. Your ordinary and common curations performed by Aurum potabile, I will omit as not worthy a second mention. Those onely wherein consisteth extraordinary note, I will match with the like. The cures most remarkable which you haue recorded are the deliuery of the difficultie and danger of Child-birth, the deli­very of dead children in the English Copie, page 72. 73. 74. [Page 85] the Dropsie page 78. of the English copie. Small poxe 87-88. of the same copie. Diuers kindes of Convulsions, Epilep­sies, Palsies, 85. 92. 93. of the same copie. Deplorate estates reputed dead and vnrecouerable, page 85. 81. 82. of the same copie. Vnto the first I equall first these two cures following. In the yeare 1604, there happened to bee my patient a wor­thy Lady then lying in Hartwell Parke in Northampton­shire She was left by a former beneficed Phisitian, as also by her Midwiues in a deplorate abortion, without hope in their combined resolutions, and with prediction of impossibilitie of deliuery with life. There augmented the former doubt and feare the presence of a continuall feauer, the double Iaundes, the yellow, and the blacke. By one only medicine, contrary vnto all expectation, and against much opposition, I imme­diatly recouered her decayed power and strength, The Lady Coke of Hart­well Parke. & within an houre or two after the assumption thereof, shee was with gladsome facilitie deliuered, her child liuing vntill the next day, with very good likelyhood of continuance in life, being notwithstanding borne twelue weekes before the time. The history is not obscure, nor the witnesses of the meanest worth and eminencie. The Iaundes of both kindes was shortly▪ with wonder vnto the beholders cured, at which time also shee a­voided from her guts a stone the bignesse of an hasle nutte, round, smooth, white, as hard as a flint, full of holes as if bo­red through.

Many yeares before the former successe, I had made proof of the same medicine, but especially in a vertuous Lad e dwelling two miles distant from Northampton westward. Shee had then beene distressed very neere the space of a sort­night, in doubt of strength and hopefull deliuery in child-bed. Within an houre, or thereabout, after the taking of the same medicine at my hand, earnestly by her desired against the op­position of other women present, she sensibly recouered her lost strength, and obtained speedily her wished deliuerance of her liuing burden: I knowe not whether the Agents for [Page 86] Aurum potabile may now haue preuailed to beget an obli­vion, and extenuation of this and diuers other my willing & fortunate endeauours in that familie.

Vnto the third Curation by Aurum potabile, and your boast therein, I doe oppose the wife of one Edward Owen, dwelling in the citty of Couentree; she was vexed the space of a weeke with the head of a dead childe, remaining in her wombe after the body was gone diuers dayes before. All o­ther meanes in vaine varied, this one medicine (when she was almost spent and ready to yeeld the Ghost) gaue vnto her comfort and strength, and within few howres after the recea­ving thereof a speedy deliuery of that dead part. She liued af­ter it two daies with some hope of recouery: but her former labour, paines, and toile, first with the first diuided part, and after with the second, and the treble vexation and weaknesse in the time of interim betweene the one and the other did de­priue her of that hope; the woman her selfe, notwithstanding, being very thankfull and ioyfull of her receaued ease, and comfort without expectation of life.

In Northampton this last passed yeare, the wise of one Maude, vexed by multitudes of other medicines, in vaine af­ter the receauing of this selfesame medicine beyond all hope or opinion, within few houres was disburdened of her dead and before mangled burden, and suruiueth the misery, and is now since that time againe with childe.

Your wonders acted by Aurum potabile in the small pox, I will paralell with as wonderfull issues by other medicines. It is now about tenne yeares past, since a poore man of Nor­thampton required my aduise concerning his child, being a­bout 4 or 5 yeares of age. She had beene partly by much for­mer Phisicke, and partly by the long continuance of her dis­ease about halfe a yeare extreamely weake and macerate. I prescribed only vnto her the assiduous vse of Carduus bene­dictus boiled in posset drinke. After this drinke vsed two or three daies, the child did cast forth an incredible number of [Page 87] wormes, and after the wormes issued the small pox plentiful­ly. Thus was the childe perfectly, and instantly recouered, & grew in strength, bignesse, and feeding. For the praise and worth of this meane medicine sensibly vnto the childe it selfe, it is worthy the recording, that the child after the recouery, did take such liking and loue vnto Carduus benedictus, that spontaneously and of the owne accord she could cry and call for it, and greedily eat it sometimes alone by it selfe in the ve­ry bitter substance.

I will followe this cure of the small poxe with another only, Anno 1601. A young Gentleman, my very worthie freind H. T. was dangerously surprised by the last mentio­ned disease, vpon which after they were fully broken out, did freshly againe start out and creepe another kinde of poxe of a lesse high colour. After the poxe were thus plentifully and doubly broken forth, and had spread and setled themselues in euery part, beyond all possibility of returne backe againe in­ward (the Gentleman notwithstanding still continuing sicke) I gaue vnto him an ordinary lenitiue. Before the receauing thereof, hee continued still very sicke and weake, vnable to moue, or to be moued out of his bed. After the first operati­on thereof, in the same instant, he was discharged of his sick­nesse, continuall heat, the noisome fume and smoak of his dis­ease, and wearisomnesse of his bed, and so perfectly and pre­sently reduced vnto his former healthfull temper, that imme­diatly without my knowledge, hee aduentured downe into the house and aire, with the fresh heat and glowing of the poxe in his face. Notwithstanding he did neuer after find any sicknesse, weaknesse, or inconuenience at all therein, the fresh remembrance, or markes only of the poxe in his face, outfa­cing the wonder. Here you may see what rare successes may oftentimes happen vnto meane trifles and toyes in their vul­gar esteeme, giuing occasion of wonder vnto men, whose de­fectiue knowledge is vnable to check and limit the too much wandring of wondring. Concerning the cures by Aurum po­tabile [Page 88] of Convulsions, Palsies, Epilepsie, or falling sicknesse, I knowe you cannot equall those wonderfull kindes, which in a former Treatise I haue published. In that See the dis­couery of er­roneous pra­ctisers in Phi­sicke likewise Chap 9. & 10. of the Triall of witchcraft, as by a second edition it is to bee enlarged, partly for more perspi­cuitie, partly for some points formerly omitted, or vnsatisfied. discouery you may discouer page 37. 38. pag. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. many won­ders of nature in the former kinds, & by ouer wondring vul­gars esteemed aboue nature, yet by natural meanes somtimes cured, sometimes qualified and mittigated, in all which I was my selfe alone imploied with no lesse happy successe then can happen to Aurum potabile.

Concerning Dropsies by Aurum potabile related in the A­pologie to haue beene vanquished, I will bound my selfe (as in all the former) vnto the equalling them within two instan­ces. A Gentlewoman of my name and family, hapned to bee suddenly and extreamly swollen in her belly, and extenuate in all other parts of her body except her legges. After three quarters of a yeare cōtinuance in this estate, with some hope of child-birth, in the end finding her selfe deceaued, and like­wise her midwiues, & some also learned (able in as great diffi­culties to iudge and discerne) she resolued her selfe to be Hy­dropicall. She did heare the counsell, & had the conference of diuers worthy and learned Doctors, and Phisitians, yet re­solued to be a patient to my selfe alone, & yet so my patient, as to haue no further patience then with one onely medicine, and but once indured, or at most twise. After the receauing hereof without any molestation vnto her, the first day with­in few houres all her humours and hydropicall swellings im­mediatly did fall, and she hath euer since that day and time beene perfectly recouered, and so hath remained now 4 or 5 yeares. If Aurum potabile had effected this, it had beene chro­nicled as a wonder, but let Aurum potabile learne not to bee 100 swift vnto wonder. Every ordinary Phisitian that hath the opportunity by any competence of practise to view the workes of nature, cannot choose but oft meet with many rare and wonderfull contingents. It behoueth a Phisitian to make rather his vse then his boast thereof. I affect not with [Page 89] the Apologist the indiscreet publication of euery particular man and name. This report hath the testimony of learned Phisitians, as concerning the disease, and of many neighbours in Northampton touching the forementioned effect.

There was Patient vnto mee this last yeare, a very aged Gentleman, one M r Wiseman, in his owne account more, in the common esteeme of other men nothing lesse, then foure­skore yeares. I found him extreamely swelled in legs, thighs, back, belly, [...]tomack, as largely as the skin was able to stretch and distend it selfe. His senses were so benummed, that hee oftentimes did not (though being awake) take notice of vsu­all or ordinary obiects. His sleepes were vnquiet with groanes and starting, his respiration very short, thicke, and full of difficultie, his reason and memory very oft by fittes, and times forraking him. Hee very earnestly desired my presence, and counsell. After my first view of him I de­parted, leauing him in my opinion (which was grounded vp­on the occasion, which his estate before described did yeeld) out of any likelyhood of helpe. I returned againe the second time notwithstanding, being againe solicited, and then I ad­ministred vnto him a tentatiue purge, hidden from his taste or sight in a little caudle. The effect thereof was admirable. All his swellings wholly descended from his vpper parts in­to his legges and thighes, the extreame sicknes of his stomack, shortnes of winde, and difficultie of breathing and suffocati­on, departed; his outward and inward senses returned perfect, and after the first operation of his purge by the vsual passage, he did also cast vp by vomit at least one pint of meere blood, without the mixture of the least moytie of any other matter or humor, being an accident, which in al his life ne [...]er former­ly had happened. So perfect an alleviation, did so presently follow the same also, that he found himselfe in strength and ability the same that he was in his former health, & forsaking his Chamber, walked into his house after his wonted manner, the space of a fortnight or three weekes, or thereabouts, [Page 90] complaining solely of his swelling in his legs. The mentioned time passed, he relapsed into the former dangerous estate: first described, and had the same deliuery with the same accidents, by the same medicine The third time he relapsed, and then discouraged with the short stay of the two former alleviati­ons, he demanded not helpe, and thus extreamely swelling in all parts, was soone suffocated. With his death, the rare and extraordinary operation of the medicine doth not die, nor is thereby obscured, or iustly to be extenuated. I [...] this rare e­vent or issue had fallen vnto the Apologist, he would haue de­dicated the memory thereof vnto the worship of Aurum po­tabile, and his owne praise. I knowe this medicine excellent for the expulsion of hydropicall waters, or swellings: but vn­to any necessary sequele therefrom, of that evomition of blood, with such swift and admirable alleviation and recove­ry thereby, from all the former euill accidents at once, instant and movent, I vaine-gloriously ascribe nothing, being a thing that happened by accident, and without fore-knowledge or hope of such event in the first intent thereof. I come now to offer vnto view the last paire of euidences, for the matching of other medicines, to be comparable with Aurum potabile, and that is, in derelict and deplorate estates, as the Apologist hath termed it, Anno 1609. a noble and worthy Lady hap­pened to be my Patient, The Lady Clifton, wife vnto the Lord Clifton. noble in true worth and vertue, wife vnto a Barron. Her disease was vnknowne, as vnto my selfe, so vnto many other her Physitians▪ but her danger was mani­fest vnto vs al. She was continually afflicted with a vehement palpitation of the heart, fainting, perpetuall want of rest and sleepe, and implacable paine and excruciation and anxietie in her stomack, as accidents and concomitants. When now in mine opinion, and in the decree of all the other learned and re­verent Physitians (some being then present with her from Oxford, some from London) as also when in all likely reason, it was impossible with that fury & vehemencie of her paines, she should surviue beyond one day at the most, not by any [Page 91] merit in my selfe, in my skill or better iudgment, but by Gods only goodnes, I did casually happen to administer vnto her, in way of variation and proofe, only a medicine procuring sleep, which beyond my expectance in reason, happened to be so fortunate in the oft iterated vse, as exceedeth credit. Vpon the first assumption thereof, she did fall into a more then ordi­nary sound sleep, from that euening, vntill the next morning. In the morning she awaked free from all paine and ill acci­dents, so continuing the space of a weeke together, being all that interim able to ride & walke abroad to visit her friends, somtimes in a calme euening to take the aire in her Coach, without any noted sense or complaint of the former accidents or paine. After a few dayes of this Halcyonian tranquillity and ease, the violence and fury of her paines vsually againe re­turned, vntill the same medicine required and receiued, pro­duced the selfe-same effect, which in this manner at the same times it failed not to do constantly almost a quarter of a yeere by continued courses or vicissitudes. In this manner was shee admirably preserued aliue so long space. After that time pas­sed, it then failed, and lost his former vertue and wont, and then within few dayes, the intollerable crueltie and fiercenes of paine, made an end of her dayes. There are divers Ladies and Gentlewomen in Northampton-shire witnesses hereof. This example of the manifest, excellent power and efficacy of a medicine, in such an estate, by so many iterations appro­ved, is not easily paralleled. I do not notwithstanding with the Apologist, exalt it aboue measure, nor arrogate vnto my selfe thereby beyond others, nor depraue other men or medi­cines in the pride thereof, nor impute vnto it aboue reason, re­membring the sage counsell of Hippocrates, lib. 2. Aphoris. 27. not to trust, or relie, or giue too much credit or honour vnto medicines or diseases, that for a time, or without reason do giue refreshing.

The yeare 1615. by a very worthy noble Knight in Bed­fordshire, I was required to visit his sicke daughter, Sir Richard Chetwood. who ha­uing [Page 92] bene divers dayes vexed with a feauer, in the end was suddainly deprived of all her inward and outward senses, and in that shape of death, continued 42 houres, both speechlesse and senselesse. Her recovery, before my comming, by her Pa­rents and friends as a thing impossible, was not so much as i­magined, but her graue intended. That remedie which hath bene formerly mentioned, to relieue in danger and difficultie of childbirth, and in expulsion of the dead infant, first revived her, and after restored her by the grace of God vnto her per­fect health, other meanes only concurring, to remoue the re­crudescence of her feaver.

Thus in that number which cannot be lesse, nor for this pur­pose, needeth to be more, that is, in a duality of instances in e­uery particular (which is sufficient for demonstration, though haply not for ostentation) I haue manifested that other medi­cines are equall vnto Aurum potabile his best perfections and performances, as also that although in pride and presumpti­ons predication, it may seeme superiour, yet in true proofe & practice, other remedies in the bl [...]ssing of God, and their own specificall vertues, are nothing inferiour. This advantage only Aurum potabile may haply haue, that when the cause of dis­eases hath bene first by other remedies remoued, or at least qualified, it remaining alwayes, or for the most part behind, as the Vltimum refugium, the last hope or refuge (as I obserue by the current of the whole Apologie) where Nature beyond all hope of sense, is now left, derelict, and without hope (as it oft falleth out) and yet insensibly doth recollect her selfe by little and little, as is oft seene, and is vsuall, when at such times she is also easily raised and helped by any meane Cordiall or corroboratiue) there Aurum potabile may alone (being left alone) participate with nature in the praise of her own work. And thus gold, the common obiect of a theefe, is herein a theefe it selfe, and robbeth Nature of hir own right. As for Natures reliefe therein, or thereby, in the same manner other meane medicines in like sort vsed, haue likewise oft times as [Page 93] well performed. In both, the true praise in the happy successe is only due to God, and not to either instrument.

Non haec humanis opibus, non arte Magistra
Proveniunt, &c.
Maior agit Deus.
That our indeavours fall out fit,
Vaine is the boast of Art or Wit,
If Gods free goodnes guide not it.

Thus farre the necessary vse and requisite convenience of confronting your arrogant and insolent boast in your owne workes and worth through Aurum potabile, hath transported me necessarily to forget that modest silence, which in euery mans owne fortunate successes, doth more truly proue him worthy praise, then all his praises can proue him truly wor­thy. Excellent is that saying of Scaliger in his poetry, lib. 3. concerning a good Physitian. Medicum effinges (saith he) do­ctum, probum, lenem, diligentem, maturum, fortunatum, Deo fretum, non suâ vel operâ, vel successu tumidum: that is, Thou shalt describe a good Physitian to be a man learned, of pro­b [...]ty in life and conversation, of faire and myld demeanure, di­ligent in the execution of his power and office, of ripe iudg­ment and vnderstanding, fortunate in his actions, relying and trusting in God aboue all, not proud, nor puffed vp with his own knowledge, his works or happy successes. Least therfore in farther opposing or answering your boasting folly, I may haply be reputed like vnto your selfe, I haue, and do omit farther by instance, to shew how easie it were to exceed you therein, I will only conclude concerning your boasting of your excellent knowledge of so rare a medicin (if it so proue) with that wittie reproofe of Persius:

Scire tuum nihil est, nisi te scire, hoc sciat alter.
Deeme you your knowledge not your owne,
Except your pride do make it knowne.

CHAP. VIII.

I Will now briefly conclude according vnto promise with such counter-testimonies against your Aurum, as for the most part my own knowledge and experience can avouch and testifie. It is now 8 or 9 yeares since a worthy Gentle­m [...]n M r Iohn Hales Esquire, my honored friend in true piety, generosity, integrity of life, in loue of Vertue and Learning, leauing behind him a happy memory with all that did know him. It is, I say, now 8 or 9 yeares since he was prisoner or captiue vnto an immedicable dropsie. He was by some frends perswaded vnto Aurum potabile, as vnto the sole sacred an­chor of remaining hope. After he had committed himselfe thereto, in the very first assumption thereof, he instantly chan­ged his former lookes, his spirit quailed, and death immediat­ly succeeded. It may be haply replyed, that this was a de­plorate disease, and therefore death was no more then was expected, as the Apologist doth in some places giue vs to consider thereof. But we could giue him also to consider a little further, viz. that in deplorate diseases, it is against Art to defame any noble remedy, as De Meth. Med. lib. 10. c. 9. Hip. lib. 2. aph. 36. 37. Galen admonisheth, by gi­uing it, and administring it in vaine, and without hope, vse, or profit. Secondly, no Physitian ought to assume vnto himselfe a priviledge, to shorten one houre or moment of the shortest date of any mans life, howsoeuer Aurum potabile doth plead custome therein.

It hapned thir last yeare, that my very worthy friend, and louing neighbour D r Hickman, Chancelour of the Diocesse of Peterborough, hauing by my indeavour the yeare before, cast off a dangerous dropsie, now this last yeare was sudden­ly surprized with a Consumption, which in him could neuer admit hope of curation, in regard of many fatall and vnre­moueable contradictions thereof. He was perswaded not­withstanding by some M. Markes. factors for Aurum potabile vnto the [Page 95] vse thereof by their directions. He expended therein 3 or 4 pounds. After he had a while applyed himselfe thereto, be­sides the sense of greater paines then before: there succeeded, (which before were vnseene) swellings in the bellie, legges, backe, secret parts, a generall decay in the former vigor of his spirits, and death it selfe, not so speedily before expected. If good hap could here haue wrought impossibility of life vnto possible, or could haue cast death out of possession, then had the attempt thereof bene vsefull and commendable, but not to distinguish where and when, vselesly, and vsefully within or without the latitude of hope, or the posse of contingence, to administer the most excellent remedies whatsoeuer, is certain and infallible testimony and evidence of want of true iudg­ment, Art and prudence.

It was reported, in my hearing, to the reuerend Doctor mentioned in the second domesticall testimony, by one M r Bernard Esquire, my louing neighbour & freind, that an ho­norable Gentlewomā in the family of the Markhams (where this gentleman was then present) being surprised by a deplo­rate disease, but without paine, or at least with tolerable sense of paine, after the receauing of Aurum potabile, inter­changed thereby for her former easie passage vnto death, a miserable durance of intolerable torture, not onely grieuous vnto all beholders and freinds, but vnto the Master of Au­rum potabile himselfe, who professed his owne sorrow and re­pentance for the dispensation thereof. The truth of this histo­ry, the mentioned worthie Doctor, according vnto the Gen­tleman his former relation by his letter vnto mee doth thus confirme. Whereas, saith he, you make report from M r Ber­nard what vnhappily happened to the young Lady Mark­ham, I will here relate vnto you what S r Iames Harrington said concerning that matter, vnto my selfe in presence of ma­ny others, viz. that the said young Lady being (as I remem­ber) his owne daughter, and languishing so long vnder sick­nesse, that no hope of recouery was left, D. Antony sent vnto [Page 96] her some part of his Aurum potabile, which preuailing no­thing at all for her amendment or ease, hee came himselfe to her in person, and did giue her some (belike) of the purest and strongest of that medicine, or a greater quantity. Within short time it wrought such an alteration in her, that the Knight, as he himselfe said, wished he had giuen 500 l rather then shee should haue indured the torment and continuall vexation, which from that time afflicted her vnto her death. It seemeth that her disease was a consumption, whereof (said her father) as she long languished pati [...]ntly, shee might haue died quietly to her selfe, and comfortably to her freinds. It was not hoped that she could haue liued 2 weekes, but shee departed within two daies, and that short time was also te­dious and greiuous vnto the beholders.

Henry Ashworth.

There came lately vnto my hands a letter subscribed by one M r Edward Reed, and directed vnto D r Warner, an anci­ent, graue, and venerable Doctor, and sometime a publique Reader in the Vniuersitie of Oxford. The letter concerneth a Gentlewoman, mother vnto the Author of the letter, who for an ague had receaued Aurum potabile from M. Markes, with this aduertisement, that she should take no other either medicine or Cordiall, but that alone. After the vse and pre­scription thereof, thus saith the letter. My mother doth finde great offense in her mouth and throat, swelling and sorenesse in her face, lipps, and mouth. Vpon sunday last came 4 Oun­ces more from M. Marks, which was so strong that the heat of it did almost fetch the skinne of my lipps, and others that tasted it. My iudgement is that some venomous drinke hath beene the cause of it, and if vpon this imperfect description of her estate, you please to iudge so, I pray you bee pleased to doe her the fauour, as to counsell what may be good for her. [Page 97] Shee cannot now swallowe any thing but a spoonefull of drinke.

Your respectfull freind Ed. Reed.

It is now 3 or 4 yeares since an old Gentleman of great estate and wealth, dwelling at Billing in Northamptonshire, M. Freeman. being greeued with obstructions of his backe and kidneyes, and the stoppage of his vrine by grauill, desired my counsell and aduise. He had before vsed Aurum potabile, by the aduise and direction of a M. Markes. grand dispenser thereof, whom I found present with him. Hee did not onely finde no ease or benefit thereby, but (as he said himselfe oft in the frequent hearing of diuers witnesses) such distemper, heat, and offense, that conti­nually afterwards the space of two or three yeares together, vpon any light occasion, he would fall into such detestations, execrations, and impatience with the very mention thereof, that it was a very difficult matter sodenly to pacifie his cho­ler. The cause he found in himselfe and would relate vnto his frends. This I can witnesse with others, that by Aurum pota­bile he receaued no ease or benefit, which notwithstanding o­ther succeeding medicines did immediatly at that time vnto his compleat satisfaction yeeld.

It were an endlesse labour to produce innnumerable in­stances. In all places almost where I happen to come within the short circuit of my practise, I finde Aurum potabile with­out blushing in the absence of the dispenser, vsually outfa­cing the present Phisitian, contrary to all reason, art, good manners, or due respect of the ilfare, or welfare of the patient. Sometimes it preuenteth good counsell, sometimes circum­venteth, sometimes interrupteth, sometimes corrupteth, sometimes peruerteth, or inuerteth. This cannot seem strange vnto any man, who can consider how full of danger and in­conuenience in reason it necessarily must be to trust an vnrea­sonable [Page 98] creature, or senselesse instrument (of what excellency soeuer) by it selfe alone, without accommodation or d [...]ecti­on thereof, by knowledge, iudgement, and due disc [...]at on, vnto a proportioned aptnesse and fit proportion, with requi­site circumstances. This abuse notwithstanding, and custome is generally vsuall in all places through this kingdome, into which so vniuersally the maker and architect of this vniuer­sall medicine doth send, sell or make sale of it. The vnauoi­dable consequent of mischiefe and inconuenience in this li­cense and liberty, although euery man is not able to obserue, yet no man can be thereof ignorant, who hauing common vnderstanding, will lend and accommodate it vnto due con­sideration of reason. Thus farre haue I equalled the praises of diuers other medicines vnto Aurum potabile. I haue en­countred also those br [...]uing testimonies of the Apologist, with a counterbuffe of other testimonies. I will now descend from the top and pride of his testimonies, vnto his sodaine precipitation & rash descent in his conclusion vnto his vaine re [...]pitulation of all his former errours.

CAP. IX.

AFter the Apologist his testimonies at large gloriously displayed, he mustereth vp againe, and offereth a re­view of al his passed positiōs in the Apology, adding with a faire florish a proclamation of his defence of truth, of charity, of loue & care of humane kind, & the health of man. I will therefore now dismantle the face of his iugling & cir­cumuention, by the manifestation, first of his owne contradi­ctions of himselfe therein: secondly, of his apparant false­hood, in his counterfeit profession of truth. Concerning his contradictions, read page 111, of the english. Thus you say, Let Electuaries, Syrrupes, Pills, Powders, remaine, & retaine their account and worth by long time and experience appro­ved. Reconcile this with the page 106, where in skorne you [Page 99] call these kindes of remedies popular Recipies and Benedicta medicamenta that doe no good, and page 104, seplasiasticke preparations. Reconcile also those words page 103, of the Latine copie left out in the English, with the page 120 of the English. In the first named place you say Aurum potabile resisteth all diseases by what name soeuer called, and remo­ueth the antecedent causes by conuenient naturall passages. In the second place you say that in a repleat body euacuati­on is necessary by purging to be had, as also that blood-let­ting in conuenient time is not to be neglected. See your con­fusion and contradiction herein. If you speake truth in the first place that Aurum potabile remoueth the antecedent cau­ses of diseases, that which you say in the second place is false, friuolous, & needlesse; namely that there is necessity of pur­gation or phlebotomie for that purpose page 101 of the La­tine copie, againe read: In our countrey (say you) Aurum potabile mixt with wine is sufficient without any other mix­ture or addition in all diseases. A few lines after this you say in the same place of the Latin copie; Notwithstanding where the aire is intemperate, or the discretion of the Phisitian, or the necessity of the person shall perswade it may be tempered with fit and proper waters. See your folly & contradiction. If there be a fitnesse and property in the waters (as you here confesse) then is not the mixture of Aurum potabile with thē arbitrarie (as before you said) but necessary. If it be necessary then is not Aurum potabile sufficient by it selfe, or in wine a­lone. Thus much concerning your contradictions. Now let vs view your manifest falshoods. Read page 97 before mē ­tioned, namely Aurum potabile neuer did hurt. This false­hood hath appeared by the counter-testimonies: Read again page 103, there you doe auouch that Aurum potabile remo­veth the antecedent causes of diseases by conuenient naturall passages. If Aurum potabile be able to remoue the antecedent causes (vnto which end phlebotomy and purging doe chiefly and mainely serue) then may they be omitted, nor are they so [Page] absolutely necessary. This is the selfe same falshood and con­tradiction, which formerly hath beene by you auouched, and by me in some part confuted. Notwithstanding, for the bet­ter euidence of so necessary consideration for the life & health of man kinde, against this harmefull errour and illusion, I wil cleere and make euident the incomparable necessity and pre­rogatiue of the generall remedies in the manifest disburde­ning of antecedent causes, aboue all other meanes or reme­dies whatsoeuer. If haply you doe not knowe what the an­tecedent cause is in diseases; Read Galen de sanitate tuenda l. 6. cap. 7. Quic quid corpus afflig [...]it ex ijs qua in ipso sunt, duplici id occasione oritur, aut redundantia, aut succi vitio: that is, whatsoeuer afflicteth the body, or causeth it to bee diseased, of such things which are within it selfe, is two waies thereto occasioned; namely by the abundance, or by the vitiousnesse of humours. Vnto the same distinction in the antecedent cau­ses, the general voice of all Phisitians doth subscribe by those tearmes of Plethora and Cacochymia. Plethora, Galen in di­vers places doth againe distinguish to be ad vasa, and ad vi­res, and in his booke de plenitudine, cap. 15. hee declareth that there is Plethora ad vasa, maior and minor, that is, a greater, and a lesse. Maior quae tunicas venarum etiam distendit, minor quae cauitatem in venis tantum replet. That is, the greater is that which with the abundance stretcheth out the veines: The lesser without distention doth only fill the veines. Concer­ning Plethora ad vires, commenting vpon the seauenteenth Aph of Hyppocrates lib. 2. he saith, Non potest diu permanere, sed processu temporis corrumpitur. That is, a Plethora, or full­nesse, simply, in regard of the imparitie and inequality of the sickmans strength to indure & beare it, cannot continue long, but it turneth into corruption, or in time is corrupted. From the former grounds and principles by the assistance of vulgar reason, may any man collect the necessitie of Phlebotomy in a Plethora, which is one antecedent cause of all materiall, or [Page 101] humorall diseases. If you desire illustration of the former ne­cessity, and explication of the reason of the necessitie, read the same author in his 3 book de Meth. Med. cap. 15. in his com­ment vpon the 7 Aph. of Hipocrates the 2 book: in his book de venae sectione contra Erisistratum. As there the necessity and reason of necessity of Phlebotomie, in Plethora▪ (which is a maine and chiefe occasion of diseases, or the antece­dent mouer, fautor, fuell, matter or cause thereof) so in o­ther places likewise, doth he giue demonstration of the neces­sity of purgation in the Cacochymia and vitious aboundance of humours that are without the veines. Read for this pur­pose his tractate intituled Quos purgare, &c. whom, when, & by what meanes it is fit and conuenient to purge; his Com­ment also vpon the second Aph: of Hip: first booke, his book de purgantium medicamentorum facultate, de Meth. Med. 1. lib. de Morborum causis. In all these places and many more the necessity of purgation in a Cacochymia doth euidently appeare, as likewise did before the necessity of Phlebotomi [...] in Plethora, the reason of both is plaine. An immediate cause in act remaining, the immediate effect must necessarily at­tend Effectus im­mediatus est sig­num [...] suae causae. Scal. de Subtil. it. The immediate cause in diseases, is that which the Phisitians call causa coniuncta. This cause cannot be without some matter or humour whereof it breedeth, which humour therfore is called causa antecedens, in regard of the necessity of a precedence thereof, before that immediate cause can possi­bly be produced. The matter or humour in the body which necessarily goeth before the disease, is there congregated in more or lesse quantity, and either within the veines or with­out. From within the veines to the outward sense Phleboto­mie doth immediatly manifest it selfe to euacuate. From the other passages, purgation is by the eye witnessed directly to draw. For this cause Purgation and Phlebotomie are called generall remedies, because in all diseases generally they doe manifestly euocate the humours or superfluities, whereof all diseases doe euer breed. Now examine your Aurum potabile. [Page 102] Is it possibly sufficiently to remoue the antecedent causes of diseases, as you report thereof, without distinction? If it bee hereto sufficient, then it must so be either in it selfe simply, or by accident. Simply nothing can bee sufficient or effectuall thereto, except those things which haue a purgatiue nature or quality. If it include such a property or quality in the na­ture thereof, then it is not simply and truely a Cordiall: & if not simply and truely a Cordiall, then is it inferiour, and n [...]t to be compared with many other things, which are truely, meerely, solely Cordialls, corroboratiues, and comforters of nature, without any mixture with another nature different and aduerse thereto as all purges are. If you say that your Aurum potabile doth by accident remoue the antecedent cause of diseases, then is it no way equall, or to be compared with Phlebotomie or Purgation, which alwaies doe certain­ly, immediatly, manifestly, speedily, and promptly euacuate superfluities, which euer are, and euer were the antecedent causes of diseases, as is aboue said. That which is, or happe­neth only by accident is casuall and vncertaine, nor can there be therein any certainty, trust, assurance, or necessary expe­ctation. And thus your leuitie, your fallacy, your insidiation, and insinuation into credulous mindes, by confused and am­biguous pronunciatiues doth detect it selfe. How vainely, & falsely therefore you make Aurum potabile his insufficiency sufficient in the remoueall of antecedent causes, is most cleare and euident. The danger hereof also is as evident, while men in their necessitie [...] trusting vnto the vncertaintie, and casuall sufficiencie hereof, may for euer in the interim o­mit and lo [...]se the opportunity, and date of life and re­couery, by the certaine manifest and assured remoueall of antecedent causes in the generall remed [...]es neuer failing, al­though in their vndiscreet, ignorant, and vnartificiall admini­stration, errors and mischiefes may oft happen, as is vsuall in all other affaires likewise, aswell as in this. Another manifest falshood is page 106. where you say, that you doe impose or [Page 103] prescribe nothing against reason, whereas in all your former proposed proofes in your Apologie, you haue not produced any one solide or substantiall rea [...]on among them all. Equall vnto this is that page 94. of the Latin copie alone, where you proclaime Aurum potabile availeable in deplorate diseases; & where all humane helpe is denied. This must necessarily be an Hyperbole, or a lie. It is not materiall which it be. I will not heere tell you, that D. Anthony doth contradict you herein, page 97. Latine Copie, where he saith (if you do remember or marke the place) that Aurum potabile in derelict or mor­tall diseases can do no good. The last falshood, or rather that which I haue reserued vnto the last, is the great mother of all the rest, namely your counterfeit profession of trueth, of cha­rity, simplicity, simple truth, which you predicate, page 109. and 94. Latin copie, likewise your profession of contempt of fame or glory, page 61. English copie; Is it contempt of glo­ry to proclaime, that God would haue you alone honoured with this great secret, which you do expressely in your Latin Preface? Is it contempt of glory to publish, that the hand of God doth miraculously aboue all other created medicines, worke by your Aurum potabile, as you doe page 91. of the Latin copie? Is it contempt of glory to ranke your medicine next vnto God, as aboue all other, the most present succour from God, which in expresse words you do page 55. Latine copie? The excellencie of the workmanship, necessarily infer­reth the praise of the workeman, being maker and master thereof. Your open praising of the one, doth secretly praise the other. There is no doubt howsoeuer your mouth dissem­bleth it, that your vaine heart doth foolishly glorie with the sot Damaetas in the worthy Sidney,

And if my man such praises haue.
What then shall I that keepe the knaue?

Thus saith he, thus thinke you. Veritas (saith Iulius Scali­ger exercit. 307. sect. 9.) est adaequatio notionum quae sunt in iu­tellectu cum rebus; that is, Truth is, adequatiō of the right no­tions [Page 104] of the vnderstanding, vnto the things themselues as they are in themselues. Truth doth neither come short, nor exceed the matter it selfe. It is not then truth to speake con­traries, to call things temperate, positiue contraries, and ther­fore contraries, because temperate. Can truth speake con­tradictory things? Can truth maintaine such an vniversality in an individuall substance, as is not subiect vnto the common and ordinary variation and mutation of all other things, by circumstance and time? Do you call it truth, to confound ignorantly things different? Do you call it charity, to per­vert the ancient euer receaued truth of all ages and times, by all men allowed and approued as authenticall oracles, and the vnchanged decrees of God and Nature? Obtrude not in this manner the Name of God, of truth, of charity. While you publish such absurd incongruities, erronious passages, depra­ued principles, crackt and vnsound reasons, and crasie testi­monies, as wildly ouer-runne the face of your whole worke, we will and can esteeme you no better then a deceiuer, a Se­ducer of men. Thinke not that Aurum potabile can be any protection for you in your insidiation and insnaring of vul­gar opinion, with the vain-glorious baites and pretexts of a new learning or revelation, neuer gained before, and now forsooth, infused into you alone. It is not vnknowne, that these like allectations and intisements, are vsuall introducti­ons vnto common illusion. There was neuer as yet seene fa­mous Heretike, Impostor, or Magitian, who was not able with the pollicitations of some more then ordinary remark­able graces, qualities, or beauties, to vaile and hide his foule acts and intentions, by the excellence of some good parts, holding earnestly and intently mens mindes and fancies, while their eyes therewith dazled, might not espie their couert fraudes. If your heart be vpright, let your tongue speake the plaine truth. Truth doth not need her defence by vntruth, by false grounds, sophisticall reason, trifling argumentations, such as you hetherto haue solely offered vnto our view. If [Page 105] you could proue your Aurum potabile to be the true Aurum, not adulterate, spurious, nor sophisticate, but indeed the very true genuine selfe-same preparation, which your grand Lulli­us, and other Philosophers haue hunted after (as is impossi­ble) yet ought you not to make an Idoll thereof, nor lift it vp aboue the nature and confines of an earthly medicine, & sens­lesse creature. You affirme it heauenly and no humane thing, page 53 of the Latin copie, and page 91. you bid the envious behold the miracles of God therein, saying, that the divine hand of God doth worke miraculously therein. Thus you say in the Latin copie, but in the English are ashamed thereof, as doubting lest the vulgars should hisse and point at this your dangerous, subtile, cunning, and secret insinuation. Modestie rather becommeth truth, then these hyperbolicall ostentati­ons. You cannot excuse it with your distinction of emphati­call termes only, since you do not only here, but in all other places, apparently iustifie, as properries reall in the nature of Aurum potabile, these like wonders. And thus far is sufficient to haue pointed out vnto you your contradictions of your selfe, and manifest falsehoods in themselues, which although you may now labour for shame of men to hide,

At cum fateri furia iusserit verum
Prodente clames conscientia. Martial.
Your now wrong'd conscience when you die,
May galle your guiltie memorie.

CAP. X.

WEe haue now, according vnto promise, declared the invaliditie of the Apologist his testimonies in generall, by good successes, meerely aduancing the praises and worth of Aurum potabile. We haue proued some testimonies manifestly false, some in reason impossible. We haue discouered the hyperbolicall assertions, false positi­ons and praises of Aurum potabile aboue sense and reason. [Page 106] We haue opposed some counter-testimonies, to qualifie the pride and swelling of the ouer-flow of his testimonies. Wor­thy Reader, mistake me not, I do not deny vnto the honora­ble personages, nor vnto any other learned and reuerent men, their dues and rites of honour, esteeme and credit, who haue daigned their testimonies in the behalfe of Aurum potabile. My desire, scope, and performance hath solely bene to mode­rate the immoderate and vnlimited arrogation of Aurum po­tabile vnto it selfe, the iniurious extenuation of the true worth of all other remedies, which God hath not giuen idlely, nor in vaine, indowed with so many seuerall specificall vertues and powers. I haue therefore indeavored to draw aside the cur­taine and couer of illusion, hiding the true face and view of the false, deceitfull, and erronious reasons of the Apologie, the equivocations therein, and contradictions of it selfe. This hath bene no more then requisite and iust in me, being by vn­iust wrong, provoked to maintaine truth against error. I haue not denyed (although iustly I may) that Aurum potabile may be proued an excellent medicine. I doe with patience expect vntill D r An. do proue himselfe the right author of the right preparation. I will notwithstanding in the interim admonish him, that he may be absolute in the dissolution of Aurum potabile, and yet dissolute in the most absolute respects of a scientificall Physitian, yea of no worth in any other worth. Thus saith Martial of Charinus vnto his friend Severus,

Quo fieri possit modo Severe
Ʋt vir omnium pessimus Charinus,
Ʋnam rem benefecerit requiris?
Dicam, sed citò; quid Nerone peius,
Quid Thermis melius Neronianis.
Quest. How can Charine that eu'r was naught
(Quoth Severe) eu'r be good for ought?
Ans. Reason (Severe) doth not say no,
Example ample proues it so.
Nero (not nere) but mere the worst
[Page 107]
Of all that merely ere were curst,
Yet blest in him was one good deed,
Since his Bathes were a blessed meed.

Apply this, D r An. we are content to reserue you for that golden purpose (if you can proue your Aurum potabile so ir­refragable and incomparable (as you haue promised) we are cōtent, I say, you shall make our generall provisiō, yet know that you may be excellent herein, and good for nothing els. Know also that no man that hath true reason, will trust his life vpon the praise, yea, or vpon the proofe of any one medi­cine simply alone, since God, Nature, difference inavoydable of circumstances & common necessities do continually teach vs to varie in most parriculars, of what kinde soeuer, or su­preme excellence.

Lastly let me tell you, that frō the naturall predominance of a mechanicall humour, you publish your encomiastick tra­ctates & bookes, burdened only with the praises of your own workmanship. Yea you are so farre transported with the pride thereof, that you advance opprobrious tearmes, and op­pose the calumnious imputation of malice and envy, against those who present you with the iust reproof of your At illud ante oculos habendū esse censeo te, me (que) alios (que) om­nes nos homines esse meminisse. Qui si quid ho­mo sit scias, fa­citè te nihil esse inte [...]liges. Scal. Exerc. 148. bound­lesse boasting. The writings of your aduersaries in presump­tuous, vnciuill, base, and rustick phrase, you terme mere froth, the deceitfull insides of rotten egges, p. 107. of the Eng. copy: waste paper to stop mustard pots, or other base offices. Are you not ashamed of this rurall rude scurrility? In vulgar clownish termes also, you call your adversaries (vnto whom notwithstanding you do not, nor can deny the dignity and rites of learned men) A b c darie comicall Raylers: & p. 106 of the Eng. copy, calumniating bablers, & p. 95. liuid Vipers: & p. 107, learned Scolds. Hath your charity (predicated page 94. of the Lat. copy) no milder temper? Is your simple truth (professed p. 109. of the lat. copy) so cholerick, so vndiscreet­ly prouoked? [...], Know and consider your selfe. Thinke not to protect your selfe therein, by taking the Iudge [Page 108] and searcher of hearts in vaine into your mouth. Your hear [...] we see by the rude and vnlearned messenger thereof, your barbarous voyce, thorow your whole worke. We haue mani­fested all your principles therein, or false, or confused, & your practise built vpon so erronious foundation, must necessarily be dangerous. We haue displayed in the right and true colors, your bundle of absurdities in the Apologie, your assertions in Nature impossible and prodigious, your metaphysicall e­lation and extolling of your vniversall medicine aboue all na­turall or Physicall condition. We haue before plainely set be­fore your eyes, your rules out of rule, your reasons without reason, your truthes, in your owne mouth, vntruths. Now setting aside verball trifling, the ouer-loue, and ouer-valuing of your selfe, come vnto the matter, and materially answere, if your conscience do witnes vnto you, that truth is your buck­ler. In the meane season I will retire my selfe, vntill your se­cond Herauld (as did your first) doe againe as vnmannerly thrust vpon me, hoping haply, because his exorbitant ascent, had many moneths beene seene in our Climate (as I heare) be­fore the abortiue eleuation thereof had presented it selfe vnto the eye of my notice, that he might now safely attempt and dare my supposed feare or sideration, with the sudden blaze of so mis-shapen and vgly a meteor.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.